/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

>not using the fact that they appointed Saudi Arabia as head of human rights

>trying to explain walls of text in tweets

If only Goobergate could make their point clearly and concisely.

>>284496

That could be a good red-pill to use for the Op. Any info about the UN exposing their fuckery is fair game.

You know what people care about?

The UN and walls of text! This will be a great op!

I'm so glad we're not dealing with sex scandals any more!

>>284505

Hm. Interesting response.

We know of a hashtag the UN is rolling out to push a false narrative. We can get the truth out there. This Op is soliciting help in the form of infographics and better red-pills, suggestions, and just your help tomorrow to take over the tag. Ways to improve are always welcome. Dont see the harm in spreading a little awareness when the UN lies to the public.

>>284517

Goobergate always had a problem with explaining its points without boring the shit out of everyone who isn't a part of Goobergate. You think people actually watch those 10 minute youtube videos you link? You think people actually read those walls of text and infographics?

Try creating a thread with the title "Polygon blames Goobergate for Oregon shooting" and link it to a rickroll, and then watch and see how many people didn't bother clicking on your link.

Suggestion for diluting the tag. Make it #TakeBackTheTech FROM identity politics and gender wars.

Use this approach if you want. Highlight REAL issues in tech and take over the UN's message.

Aside:

Complaining about the presentation is somewhat helpful, but if we all pitch in and make better info graphics and messages for normies, that would be most beneficial. Thanks anons

Thx for stickying mods. I think we can all work together on this one and seriously just steal the UN's hashtag for ourselves.

#TakeBackTheTech for REAL tech issues!

>>284530

Hashtag hijacking is something the twitter brigade is great at.

>>284530

I'm not sure the UN's tag is going to be a big deal. Most people don't pay any attention to UN stuff. If anything, shitting on a tag that UN types care about might just motivate more free speech limitations on the internet.

When's the last time a hashtag op demonstrably accomplished anything for GG, anyway?

I'm having a hard time seeing a favorable cost/risk/reward equation on this one.

>>284536

This is a long-term campaign they are rolling out to spread their narratives. They have had websites set up for this for years. The UN meeting this week was to relaunch it to push the next set of narratives. It's all in the sources.

We can just steal it from them. Then use their own campaign to red-pill normies about real tech issues and how their gender wars are manufactured.

All by tweeting out some shit.

So whats the risk again?

>>284537

You can't steal attention from something ordinary people aren't paying attention to. You're assuming this will be a big deal, but I doubt it will. When is the last time a fucking UN initiative floated through your social media stream?

If it blows up, sure go nuts.

The risk is throwing rocks at a hornets' nest of international policy wonks. If they get their feefees hurt, they might decide there's such a thing as "reasonable" limitations on online speech. These aren't gamer normies at a conference, they're politicos. You have to consider the bigger picture.

>>284540

This campaign will happen whether we take it over or not. The bottom of the OP image is from the UN.

Our options are to take it from them and use it to our advantage, or just leave it alone.

I guess that's your individual choice.

I had a strange idea about this. Seeing as it's another campaign to silence the internet, why don't we link net neutrality and the TPP into it as well? It was straight every single thing that every single government agency is doing to silence the Internet. That would not go over well on the UN, because then you see the international implications as well as the free exchange of money while stopping the free exchange of ideas. That would make them look really, really bad.

This might actually cause the TPP to be completely killed, and put it back on to net neutrality where it needs to go back to. When people see that all three of them are linked, as well as the UN trying to help enact the TPP, it spells all kinds of negative things about international government and their links to corporate greed.

>>284545

Yeah it's all related. Great ideas!

If we take the tag for ourselves we can use it to raise awareness on REAL issues. We can do whatever we want with it.

It just won't be theirs anymore. And the salt yields will be tremendous.

Anons in /v/ have already started helping out.

Two page 1 threads on KiA if you know any normies interested:

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3o0l2u/new_hashtag_alert_takebackthetech_and_a_cunning/

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3o0whk/happenings_optakebackthetruth_urgent_un_launching/

Reminder for effectiveness:

Use only 1 tag per tweet (i.e. don't tag GG)

Create an original tweet using the 1 tag #TakeBackTheTech

Retweet others using that 1 tag in their tweets

This smells like a trap. They'll point to us on the hashtag as an example of ==CYBERVAWG== and say that it proved them right all along.

Get the word out. We may be in the spotlight here. Tell the twitter peeps to be polite, cut the fucking memespeak, and most importantly, to be concise.

Normies won't bother reading a wall of text or watch a 10 minute eCeleb video.

They will not bother digging further than the biased Wiki page.

Spoonfeed them the truth, don't just dump autistic infographics on them with no contex

Aw, fuckit. Who cares. Nobody's going to listen to this.

I'm tired.

>>284540

>These aren't gamer normies at a conference, they're politicos. You have to consider the bigger picture.

THEY are the ones bringing up this "reasonable limitations" shit in the first place.

Meaning they are already willing to go along with this shit.

What can be done is pointing out how stupid and wrong such a thing is, and at least warn people that they are actually serious about this.

>>284496

>>284499

http://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/wikileaks-exposes-secret-deal-to-get-saudi-arabia-on-un-human-rights-council/

https://archive.is/rwVsS

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/29/uk-and-saudi-arabia-in-secret-deal-over-human-rights-council-place

https://archive.is/qZI0a

https://twitter.com/FT/status/649686105072271360

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0ce7880c-684b-11e5-a57f-21b88f7d973f.html

https://archive.is/qZI0a

This helps?

I wasn't able to find the direct wikileaks link, so that would be better for purposes of trust but verifying.

>>284669

sauce http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/Oral_History/Hopper_Grace/102702026.05.01.pdf

>>284496

This is fair. Concise redpills like this works best

>>284536

>When's the last time a hashtag op demonstrably accomplished anything for GG, anyway?

SPJ. Koretzky only decides to touch the GG topic because of the hijacked SPJ ethics week #

>>284526

>Goobergate

Could you stop talking like a childish cunt? Your baby names only make you sound like a fool.

#takebackthetech was the original hashtag, but the seem to have moved towards #ImagineAFeministInternet

[Suggestion: Post in BOTH tags]

So focus in Feminist topics:

Gender studies are very useful in the scientific field (Computer science, mathematics, chemistry, physics, engineering, biology) Gender studies do not spawn Stem grades

vouch for gendered accounts giving women special privileges/protection over male accounts

advocate for gendered laws applying to males, but not females

ask for help from the patriarchy if a women is in peril

remove agency from women by telling them what they have to do

reinstate gender roles by attaching certain roles, traits, … to gender

blame men, praise women

silence any opposition by using the SJW 3S

devalue offences by inflating statistics for shock value

scare women by telling them how bad the internet is and there is not help for them

ask for gendered funding - aka projects/research for women only

instantiate biased statistics to reinforce a biased representation.

ask for closed female spaces, oppose male closed spaces female vs male space

introduce gender to a general problem (online harassment -> Women & girls harassed)

reverse trolling (FemFreq(TM)) - troll a community with feminist accusation and call harassment after receiving a backlash.

female actions should not have consequences

critique is misogynistic

Feminists represent all women & men

Feminist Tech re-implementation

C+= A feminist programming language

Internet:

IPvFem: gendered packages, TCP requires consent (requires 40% no-rate)

DNS, Routing Backbones removed due patriarchal hierarchy

female ID chip for internet use

Source:

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3o35sn/happening_alternate_hashtag/

>>284769

>#ImagineAFeministInternet

I'd rather not…

>>284540

good idea leader! doing nothing and assuming everything will improve is clearly the better option

>>284867

I honestly don't agree with furry/futa/lewd bombardment. Fuck PR, but it also drowns out our own infographics.

>>284769

>ImagineAFeministInternet

I figure it would just be SJW/feminist portion of tumblr – except everywhere.

Show the #IGF and #IGF2015 tags some love

The IGF is the UN committee writing the "Countering the abuse of women online" report, after all. This entire thing was designed to solicit case studies for it.

http://igf.wgig.org/cms/aboutigf

http://igf.wgig.org/cms/best-practice-forums/4-practices-to-countering-abuse-against-women-online#review-draft-ii

Won't you help them and give them some case studies, anons?

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23IGF2015

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23IGF

>>284886

"They did flip the hashtag to #takebacktheteck

#takebacktheteck

NEW HASHTAG

HIT IT!!!"

>>284904

>the only reason the government wants them all to exist is because half the women in the western world would be unemployed if they didn't

I think you might be onto something. I talked to two groups just today while posting in the tag, and one of them didn't provide their own sources and just said look at the feed of the other.

>>284886

I monitored #IGF2015 and #IGF. Seems pretty dead to me.

>>284908

#IGF2015 is in the OP image. We can monitor until they start using it for their lies or just pre-emptively take it over. Either way. It's intended to solicit "case studies" for their bullshit report as well.

Flood it with red-pills now or just watch what they do.

>>284536

Hashtag jacking is more for getting thw word out then anything.

As for hashtag shenanigans, the whole shitposting with Cyberviolence created such an outcry that the UN had to back down in the first place.

>>284875

>Implying it's gamergate

Probably the usual shitposters. Remember, this is slightly bigger then GG but a lot of others are watching this too. Most that I've seen are dropping redpills but the shitposting will always be right behind us.

>>284918

The most prominent one had GG in his profile and also retweeted stuff from GG. I've seen him before in other tags as well I think.

>>284536

>When's the last time a hashtag op demonstrably accomplished anything for GG, anyway?

Just now.

We hijacked the TakeBackTheTech hashtag and it accomplished lulz.

>>284932

>sperged out about conspiracy theories and shit no one will actually read

Well done Goobers.

>>284934

Don't forget "GatorGoobers are better at spamming than us because unlike them we have lives".

>>284982

You shouldn't Dox… Unless it's a man, then it's okay!

Self-awareness, what's that?

>>284964

Yes, they have so much more of a life than GamerGate people because they have the time to just keep coming here and telling us we have no lives. Frequently. Almost every hour on the hour.

Really, which what these peoples superiority complex? They come on to our board and then tell us were a bunch of assholes all the while thinking they've accomplished anything when really they're a bunch of hypocritical brain dead believers.

>>285028

Phase 2 addresses this. Will be released shortly.

Shills trying to divide and conquer on /pol/. Hope you all are aware of the immense level of this lately, trying to turn factions against each other to weaken us.

Just remember, some of us are normal gamers too, and we care about the internet just as much as you.

Thread related, saying you're trying to bury the issue.

>>>/pol/3572235

Holy shit there are to shill threads on /pol/ right now as we speak the fuck is going on today?

>>285111

Trips, we are close to something important it seems.

Also, https://twitter.com/hashtag/takebackthetech?src=hash is being taken by spanish speakers. Given the language barrier, now it's time to release just facts and inphographics without risking to engage in conversations that can be taken out of context.

>>285092

It's just baffling that people try to dredge up all these strawman reasons or that they purposely take everything out of context to justify being contrarian as fuck. We've all got the same end goal (preserving free speech), so why are they doing their best to attack us?

>>285108

D-dammit anon I just got up, I don't wanna fap yet

>>284768

Why shouldn't I call Goobergate Goobergate, Goobergate?

>>28520

pedo

>>285092

Nobody needs to "try" to turn us against pol. They've been an albatross around gg's neck from the start. The very definition of fair-weather friends.

Fuck pol today.

Fuck pol tomorrow.

Fuck pol forever.

>>285234

Lets see how /pol/'s been doing recently.

>Confederate flag got banned

>Gay marriage got legalized

>Mass migration into Europe

>About to lose 2016 US election to Hillary

Yep, we should totally take advice from them.

Op Take Back The Truth Phase II

ANOTHER UN REPORT IS COMING.

What are YOU going to do about it?

Action Items

Op Take Back The Truth has already been a success by any metric. For possibly the first time, those of us using #GamerGate to communicate, and our allies, PRE-EMPTIVELY stole MULTIPLE hashtag campaigns from the UN committee that's pushing its bullshit "cyberviolence" narrative, and pushing a path towards internet censorship.

Don't let anyone fool you: the results have dealt a blow to the UN and its Internet Governance Forum (IGF), who needed this campaign to collect "case studies" to cite as evidence in the next draft of its "Countering the abuse of women online" report. We:

- blocked their usage of the social media campaigns to solicit data they could cherry-pick and use to further push their narrative

- delayed the report and put it in under public scrutiny; including the UN's history of using a faulty reverse-scientific method to "validate" pre-determined conclusions, and citing false information as evidence

- (if we keep the pressure up and completely co-opt these campaigns) took over their own hashtags and can potentially use them against the UN by continually shining the spotlight on the their activities, and sending a message that the public doesn't appreciate being sold censorship under the guise of preventing "cyberviolence" against women (and by blaming video games and Pokemon in the process)

- have the chance to become a watchdog for narrative-pushing at the UN, exposing their plans as they roll them out

- learned that we can actually stop them and make a difference-if we keep it up

We've already proven our power by making the UN retract their report and by taking away their social media campaign; now, they're forced to think long and hard about the next report they release and how they convey it to the public.

It only takes ONE anon to make a difference

I know we're all lazy, but if you take the time to do even just one of the things below, you'll be helping in a very important fight that not only affects video games, but THE ENTIRE INTERNET. It's not just a fight against SJWs in tech, it's against the SJW mentality spread through DECADES of indoctrination on a GLOBAL SCALE. It's not hyperbole. Anons all over are discovering the truth for themselves.

But all of this started with a tiny group of anons. From the source information, one anon posted the Op everywhere. Yes, that's right. ONE PERSON. Could it have been done better? Of course, but considering anon thought of this an Op in 10 minutes, I'd say it turned out okay. If even just half of us took this initiative, think of how much shit we'd get done.

1/5

>>285251

2/5 (continued)

Educate yourself

Understand the key players behind this narrative, and the REAL key players behind THEM. Understand WHO they are and what they do. Understand WHY they are doing this. Establish their MOTIVE.

Strive to find the answers these questions: WHO exactly is pushing for more women in tech and global internet censorship and governance? WHAT are their end goals and HOW are they going to achieve them? WHEN did they start doing this and WHEN do they expect to complete it? WHERE exactly is this happening?

Consider this hypothesis: Equating cyberviolence with actual violence, and stating that cyberviolence against women is a real problem with no proof, is perpetuating a manufactured crisis which uses identity politics and gender wars to:

- generate demand for censorship and global internet regulation

- generate an increase in the supply of female tech workers by changing women's perception of tech-related fields

Obviously, there's much more to it than that. But that's where you come in.

View the source video, then DOWNLOAD the sources in the description for yourself. Read the links and the source article. You won't understand what's happening, and thus can't help others understand, if you don't take the time yourself. SPREAD the archived information.

>>52269

http://theralphretort.com/new-un-plot-to-make-the-internet-a-safe-space-exposed-and-it-was-hiding-in-plain-sight-1008015/

A good APC dig:

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3o2q3g/the_takebackthetechnet_foil_is_owned_by_a_high/

https://archive.is/6NHbw

Take a look directly at the UN IGF's site

http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/best-practice-forums/4-practices-to-countering-abuse-against-women-online#review-draft-ii

https://archive.is/dfq05

http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/aboutigf

https://archive.is/GbeJs

To the average person, this looks like a good cause. You need to be able to explain what the UN is truly advocating for, and what would need to happen for them to get their way. Know what's going on so you can explain to others and defend against lies.

NOTE: As you discover the UN's plans, there's an important distinction to make: The IGF / APC / Take Back The Tech's public message is about using "tech to end violence against women". Note that on its face, it does NOT say "online violence". Thus, never attack that main message without showing the entire context of how they define violence: "cyberviolence" should be considered actual violence. Without this context, it looks like you're criticizing a good thing.

2/5

>>285252

3/5 (continued)

Fill Draft II of the next UN report with (respectful) comments

Draft II is open for public comment. Get in here while it's still available!

http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/draft-ii-bpf-on-practices-to-counter-online-violence-against-women-and-girls/part-1-introduction/

(Part 1)

See left-hand side for links to parts 2 and 3

Understand what the UN is pushing first hand and its implications, then let the UN know how the public feels about this in a respectful manner. And do it as many times as possible. Poe's Law is especially effective. See how far you can push it. Perhaps they may even include your suggestions in the report.

IT'S WAR!

THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO ENGAGE US

https://archive.is/vp4zD

http://theralphretort.com/rad-fem-who-plotted-takebackthetech-accuses-gamergate-of-cyber-attack-1010015/

Take Back The Tech campaign

#TakeBackTheTech

#ImagineAFeministInternet

Known possible backup tags

#TackBackTheTeck

#TakeBackTeck

#EVAW

IGF (part of the campaign above but also used for UN IGF events)

#IGF

#IGF2015

Respectfully correct any misinformation that pops up. POE'S LAW. See if they bite. But try not to butt into people's discussions. There's no need to get banned by Twitter over something this stupid. We need you to keep your account.

Be vigilant - All eyes on the UN, IGF, APC & their corporate collaborators

- Look for upcoming social media campaigns and events

- Get on their mailing lists

- Attend their online conference calls

- Keep up with any new reports or narratives

- Watch for any new campaigns they create, whether it's new branding for the same narrative or new committees. Don't think they wont try another angle. The IGF / APC are well-funded, have endless resources, and get paid to do this. There isn't any other option for them but to keep trying unless they are totally dismantled. The moment we rest is when they pick up steam again.

- Look for evidence of twitter manipulating results to hide the red-pills the tags we just co-opted. Capture that evidence, and spread the word.

3/5

>>285253

4/5 (continued)

DIG

Many digs are going on across all GG communities. Share information between communities and work together to brainstorm leads.

Let's get a new dig thread going

- Ignore drama and derailment in dig threads.

- Build off the information dug from the retracted Broadband Commission report

- Draw connections in the UN's narrative with related issues like TPP and net neutrality - but don't get too tinfoil. Find actual connections.

- Find any connections to previous digs: the Ed-Tech industry, Serious Games, DiGRA, Berkman Internet Society, Digital Media and Learning Hub (DML), MS Research, MacArthur Foundation (HINT: manufactured crises). Again, keep the Reynold's Wrap in the kitchen drawer.

- Friendly reminder: Perpetuating drama may jeopardize the release of good information. Don't touch the poop.

- Hint: Look into the "interesting" names who have helped with the IGF report (i.e. Disney and Google). Take this with a grain of salt, but in entertainment circles, Disney execs are panicking at being tied to this report (they directly contributed to the writing of the report). If you can find out what they are trying to hide, and get some proof, you can expose the conflict of interest and the ulterior motive of the report.

Collaborative digging, secrecy, circumstantial evidence & dumping info

- Teams can be helpful to share data, but you do not need others to dig. Anyone can dig solo using google and other tools. If you find good information, post it. You do not need anyone's approval; you do not need an alliance. There are no gatekeepers to dig information you've found independently; you decide how to release the information and when.

- The only reason to withhold information is if it would cause leads to dry up. It is up to you when you think you've exhausted the extent of a dig and can safely release the information, especially when releasing as anon. You do not need anyone's approval to release it. That said, err on the side of caution. Don't rush if it's not necessary. Take some time to sit on it before you make any rash decisions.

- Don't share your information with anyone you haven't personally established trust with. Reputation or recommendations in an online, anon operation mean jack shit. Go with your gut (unless your gut is made of spaghetti).

- Always verify leads before running with them. If claims are not verified, make sure it's clear in your info dump that you need help getting more evidence and specify for which claims. If you are reading an info dump, treat claims without direct evidence as NOT 100% verified.

- Avoid tinfoil. Circumstantial evidence is a start, but you need primary evidence to fully verify a claim. Circumstantial evidence is enough only in rare cases.

- Primary evidence = STRAIGHT FROM THE SOURCE (or archive on 3rd-party site with time/date stamp). Use common sense: screencaps can be shooped, anyone can make a pastebin, emails can be faked. THAT'S NOT PROOF. Doesn't mean it's not useful, but you cannot treat it as primary evidence.

- Don't trust anyone, especially if just handed information unsolicited. Could be a fake leak.

- Clearly present the evidence you have. If not fully verified, clearly state the claims that are not verified. clearly label circumstantial evidence. Let the information speak for itself - no need to add anything else. The more direct, primary evidence you have to back up your claims, and the more clearly you present it, the more likely it is to receive attention.

Archive Tips

- ARCHIVE.IS EVERYTHING, DOWNLOAD A LOCAL COPY & BACKUP TO EXTERNAL OFFLINE STORAGE

- If you find pdfs or other downloadable text documents, archive a google search showing the section of the text you queried for within the document you downloaded. This will evidence that google found that text within the downloaded doc and it was not altered.

4/5

>>285255

Great work anon! Everyone, read this carefully, read the stuff you're planning to contribute with or discuss, and get to it. Those dubs were really deserved leader.

>>285271

>posting 5 times in a row

>WOW HE GOT DUBS

I would like to thank the UN for using the instruction manual of a flamethrower to operate the killallmen submarine.

Special thanks to SJWs for permanently putting the sub on the radar. We never would have seen it without you.

>>285253

>IT'S WAR!

>

>THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO ENGAGE US

>

>https://archive.is/vp4zD

>

>http://theralphretort.com/rad-fem-who-plotted-takebackthetech-accuses-gamergate-of-cyber-attack-1010015/

>

>Take Back The Tech campaign

>

>#TakeBackTheTech

>

>#ImagineAFeministInternet

>

>Known possible backup tags

>

>#TackBackTheTeck

>

>#TakeBackTeck

>

>#EVAW

>

>IGF (part of the campaign above but also used for UN IGF events)

>

>#IGF

>

>#IGF2015

>

>Respectfully correct any misinformation that pops up. POE'S LAW. See if they bite. But try not to butt into people's discussions. There's no need to get banned by Twitter over something this stupid. We need you to keep your account.

Can someone verify if twatter is manipulating search results to hide red-pills and push their SJW buddies in TakeBackTheTech to the top? Evidence would be nice.

Need to think ahead… if this is happening we need to work around it.

>>285253

>Fill Draft II of the next UN report with (respectful) comments

>

>Draft II is open for public comment. Get in here while it's still available!

>

>http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/draft-ii-bpf-on-practices-to-counter-online-violence-against-women-and-girls/part-1-introduction/

>

>(Part 1)

>

>See left-hand side for links to parts 2 and 3

>

>Understand what the UN is pushing first hand and its implications, then let the UN know how the public feels about this in a respectful manner. And do it as many times as possible. Poe's Law is especially effective. See how far you can push it. Perhaps they may even include your suggestions in the report.

>

The other sections of the next UN report need more comments. Here are all parts of the report:

Intro:

http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/draft-ii-bpf-on-practices-to-counter-online-violence-against-women-and-girls/

Part 1:

http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/draft-ii-bpf-on-practices-to-counter-online-violence-against-women-and-girls/part-1-introduction/

Part 2:

http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/draft-ii-bpf-on-practices-to-counter-online-violence-against-women-and-girls/part-2-2/

Part 3:

http://review.intgovforum.org/igf-2015/best-practice-forums/draft-ii-bpf-on-practices-to-counter-online-violence-against-women-and-girls/part-3/

As of now they are all open for public comment on the right-hand side of the screen.

Remember, actual, respectful criticism: OR try to get them to include a preposterous Poe's Law-style suggestion. Have fun.

>>285430

The PPH on this board is pretty low so I would have just gone with 50%.

>>285548

i love how quickly aGGros flip back and forth between their extreme caricatures of us

>oh, gamergate is over…. it was just 300 man babies throwing a tantrum last year

the next day:

>HELP, goobergate cyber attacked the UN's hashtags

>>285715

also, archive tweet searches so we can prove that the vast majority were simple disagreement and mockery. make infographics of those, proving the APC is lying

>Internet Governance Forum

> a multi-stakeholder forum for policy dialogue on issues of Internet governance.

>The establishment of the IGF was formally announced by the United Nations Secretary-General in July 2006.

Makes you glad the US didn't relinquish control of the Internet to the UN, doesn't it? Internet freedom would be a thing of the past by now if dictatorships got the majority vote over it's future.

>>285727

You really need to learn about the TPP more.

>>285751

The TPP scares me, but the UN in control of the internet is even more terrifying.

>>286172

We need our own thinktank.

It doesn't even have to be fancy, a $100,000 endowment could get it up and running.

>>286193

>Can't even fund 8chan to keep it running

>Blows money on a sea lion

>HEY GUISE LETS BLOW 100K ON A THINKTANK

>>286195

Exactly. With a few exceptions, people here waste money on temporary things instead of trying to produce anything that will last.

Sorry, but you simply don't have the connections, money, and experience needed to imitate rich people. Stick with poor people ideas.

>>286199

Thank you.

The defeatism is what challenges me to keep creating successful Ops for you faggots.

>>286201

Remember when you people thought you could create a successful alternate wikipedia despite the fact that you can't even maintain your own wikia?

That's about how well this thinktank crap is gonna work.

>>286203

God dammit. How about you at least wait until I tell you what it is before you criticize it.

>totally ruins the mystery and hype I was trying to build

You sir, are truly a bundle of sticks

Zoe Quinn at the UN (Animation) Damsel Criticism = Cyber Violence

[2/2] continued

>>287347

How: How are the UN / IGF, APC, Microsoft Research, DiGRA, Fem Freq, etc etc increasing the supply of female tech workers? Are they reaching out to young girls through tech-related outreach programs, designed to foster an interest in tech at an early age, and provide resources to truly cultivate an interest in a tech career as they grow older? They very well might do that, but I personally have not seen these programs highlighted. The predominant method seems to instead be:

- Cyberviolence narrative

- Fear-mongering

- Identity politics

- Gender wars

You know the drill by now. They're doing it in a way which makes me question their intentions, even without considering the theory above! It's in-your-face. It's effective, it's efficient, and it's one way of *ensuring* that the intended outcome they want is embraced by the oh-so-concerned public.

For years and years, while everyone just nodded their heads, they've slipped this narrative in where ever they could. And we did nothing.

>UN pdf document DATING BACK to March of 2001 that describes the development of "Social Justice" and "Social Justice Warriors"

https://archive.is/3Z0TZ

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3ojs4q/un_pdf_document_dating_back_to_march_of_2001_that/

But anyway, may the dankness of our memes sustain you in the coming battle.

[1] Source is the IGF's publicly available conference calls and meeting notes; link in the Sources of OP

Sauce:

https://archive.is/nusRo

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3oa04u/goal_op_take_back_the_truth_phase_ii_the_apc_has/cvxy3vn]

>>287350

disregard. was meant for x-post. sorry.

>>287348

That's not a UN document, it's just hosted on that website because of a calender entry for an ASPA conference:

http://www.unpan.org/Events/Conferences/tabid/94/mctl/EventDetails/ModuleID/1532/ItemID/220/Default.aspx

Also his definition of "social justice warrior" isn't the same as the modern one, he presumably independently invented the same term for a different concept. "Social justice" has been an obscure term in philosophy/law/government forever, it only became associated with SJWs in recent years because it catching on with the SJW community (and since the term was obscure most people didn't have preexisting associations with it).

>>287485

Attacks? What?

>>287361

>wars

>>287485

https://archive.is/ku2Qp

MORE NARRATIVE SHIFTING

>UN / IGF / APC dindu nuffin!

Are you gonna let them whitewash what they've been doing behind the scenes?

>>287363

You're entirely correct about the document not really having anything to do with the UN.

But if you had been active in liberal/progressive politics, you would have heard the term "social justice" a whole lot. It's never been obscure in political circles.

(I've actually had to suggest to older political activists not to use the term anymore, since SJWs have so horribly tarnished it.)

>>287546

>Online activists genuinely concerned with free speech might want to consider listening to the people and organizations that have spent decades fighting for a more free and open Internet, instead of cynically seeking to suppress them.

"No, WE'RE the good guys! We want you to have freedom of speech, so long as it is not offensive in a way we determine. Oh, pay no attention to that man being arrested, he just disagreed with a woman, and as you know, we say that's violence."

Someone needs to hit these fuckers with a dictionary. A library dictionary. The extra large ones they use as a reference.

>>287759

x-post of example debunking:

>We should be tearing that post apart and asking for sources for each of his claims.

I broke it down from a P.R. standpoint here and addressed almost every line.

My takeaway is the new narrative is we're some combination of clueless kids and crazy cranks and corporate shills, and they're trying to arouse liberals everywhere to our menace by raising the stakes: the new lie isn't that we're just "harassers," it's that we're actively trying to suppress human rights.

We have scared the shit out of them, and in typical fashion they're doubling down again. I'm not sure how much further they could even escalate the rhetoric: what's worse than a "campaign fighting against human rights"? We're supervillians trying to pull a Hank Scorpio on the web?

READ TO SEE THE #CYBER-RAVAGING OF THE UN'S OBVIOUS PR FAGGOTRY

https://archive.is/Vd1Vf

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3ol3x2/david_sullivan_of_global_network_initiative_for/cvytuhj?context=3

>>287792

So I clicked another and

>"A video depicting two women being abused by a group of men surfaced on Youtube. The YouTube clip also showed the man, believed to be in his 20s, repeatedly intimidating his victims using vulgarities in Tamil language at a public parking lot.

>The assault appeared to be primarily aimed at one of the women, but her friend also received several slaps as she shielded her from the man throughout the six-minute-long video.

>The man was believed to be accompanied by at least two accomplices. One of them apparently recorded the encounter while the other person was captured on the video, teasing the woman by putting his face near her neck. One of them was heard saying: “Get inside the car and I will check if she is a virgin.”

So uh… assuming this isn't made up. Instead of calling the police or doing something about it himself, a moron records and Youtubes as it occurs.

……….and somehow he is guilty of "PHYSICAL HARM" against a woman? HOW DOES THIS MAKE ANY FUCKING SENSE. Is the guy a piece of shit? Should he get punished for his actions, if he and his actions are real? Yes, definitely! But this has nothing to do with "e-bullying" leading to real harm.

THESE PEOPLE ARE INSANE.

>>287793

Quite inconvenient to their agenda that the first thing I came across that seems like a genuine threat that should probably be taken seriously involves loony muslims:

>"The United Nations human rights office today urged the Government of Mauritania to protect prominent human rights activist Aminetou Mint El-Moctar who has become the focus of a social media campaign encouraging anyone who “kills her or tears out her eyes will be rewarded by God.”

>The activist has been targeted after the leader of a movement known as “Friend of the Prophet” issued a fatwa against her because she publicly demanded a fair trial procedure, in compliance with Mauritania’s international human rights obligations, for Mohamed Ould M’Kaitir. He is a young Mauritanian man who has been awaiting trial on charges of apostasy since January. Due to the nature of the charges, no lawyer wants to defend him making a fair trial impossible."

>>287794

Another:

>VIOLENCES CONJUGUALES

>Abuser/Violator: Someone known

Closed tab already. Literally everything with this descriptor shouldn't count as far as the validity of LWs being physically threatened by being called names on the internet is concerned. And it's BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that's what they want to validate through that "11% experienced PHYSICAL HARM!!!!!!!" number.

God, this is so deeply fucking disingenuous. Holy shit.

>>287795

By the way I'm pretty sure

>VIOLENCES CONJUGUALES

means spousal violence.

SPOUSAL VIOLENCE THAT THE GUY THEN TWEETS ABOUT IS NOT "E-BULLYING". IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THESE PEOPLE ARE PUSHING.

Jesus fucking shit.

>>287759

>Peter Daou is the Publisher of UN Dispatch. Mark Leon Goldberg is the Managing Editor and oversees the work of a roster of freelancers. Unless otherwise attributed, the views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of any site sponsors, the United Nations, or any other entity.

Peter Daou:

"Former advisor to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Activist. Jazz pianist. War survivor. Dad. Details here: http://peterdaou.com"

Mark Leon Goldberg (lol Goldberg) seems like a nobody.

>>287915

x-post:

APC actually had someone who went through 20.000 tweets and pulled 240 (or 270?) of the "pro-#TakeBackTheTech" tweets out of them and made a storify about it.

I dunno if they actually went through all, but I've seen the storify.

twitter.com/EroTICs_India/status/653905063329538048

Well, that didn't take long. It's 241 tweets.

>Research & advocacy project on the intersection of gender, sexuality & Internet. Tweets by @smitav18

>EroTICs India

And here is the APC one I've seen when it was posted. Apparently a bunch of feminist advocacy groups reposted it in the tag.

twitter.com/APC_News/status/653869459980075009

>>287915

There was that guy who analyzed the GG tweets to disprove that it was a harassment campaign (No leader, no mass of tweets aimed at one person, etc). He was doxxed and doesn't want anything to do with us (IIRC) but if we could get a simillar analyst, it'd help.

Of course, we also need to analyze any analysis they do to "prove" GG is harassing the UN. If they show their working out, we can point out the flaws in it. If they don't show their working out, we demand to see it while presenting our own evidence proving it's BS.

Op Take Back The Truth - Emergency Goals - Oct 16

Reach friendly / neutral people with any influence, whether it be academia, media, government, activism, public policy, gaming… ANYONE WITH INFLUENCE.

Spread this infographic

http://i.imgur.com/GfZlaCB.png

Example for easy RT'ing:

https://twitter.com/SportzPunz/status/654197519170146304

Example tweet reaching out to WikiLeaks and InfoWars:

https://twitter.com/SportzPunz/status/654711272492003328

Break containment and get outside attention any way you can! Send them an email and ask them to cover the developing story!

DISNEY HAD A DIRECT HAND IN THE IGF VAWG ONLINE REPORT

https://youtu.be/zz7to-GZRUc

>>288648

THE UN'S PR HITPIECE: CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOUND

https://youtu.be/RraxWRNEM_M

>>288485

http://theralphretort.com/its-about-ethics-in-un-journalism-1016015/

https://archive.is/nvEb4

SALON JOINS THE UN DAMAGE CONTROL EFFORT

https://archive.is/Q2xpF

http://theralphretort.com/un-update-hack-calls-me-a-con-conspiracy-theorist-new-info-on-their-next-moves-1014015/

Note: Do not engage the authors of the PR hitpieces above. They're true believers and will play the victim.

STAND BY FOR MORE GOALS

Link for normies:

https://redd.it/3oa04u

I remember when GamerGate started, people were saying how we would end up saving the world. It was a nice thought, but I thought it was a silly exaggeration. But fuck, they might have been right.

>>289088

That's what happens when you get your coaching from /pol/.

yes

>>289313

So it's going to be like the SJW hypocrites who call for more "inclusiveness" and "diversity" of characters, and then get offended and scream bloody murder when the villains as well as the heroes are diverse?

Also, Sluggy Freelance, fuck yeah.

>>284579

This is good

Glad reddit and /v/ are doing their part

>>285251

>>285252

>>285253

>>285254

>>285255

Great post

>>289330

bet all them creepy white dudes gangraped that token black girl

Did we take back the truth?

>>296633

>Since tumblrinas are going all fucktard nutso over Undertale

What's this now? Why would they hate Undertale? I thought it was the one game both GG and aGG liked.

>>296842

Jack deserves some respect because it was the very first grimdark furry webcomic.