/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

>>288525

IA tweeted it not long ago

humbly turn shit over to me in a neat and tidy manner.

I am waiting. Please provide your e-mail address, so that I may contact you and receive the BO login.

Thank you,

anon

Holy shit, you guys are so fucking desperate for attention.

>>288523

>being so mad you take the time to draw and color this

aGG is so salty they thirsty as fuck for attention lol

>revolters not even realising how intolerant they became of anyone not sucking their cocks.

>>288537

>bumping your own thread

hahaha

>>288541

adding context.

>saging a page one thread

>>288528

Why would I follow the tweets of a faggot who drops everything for a crazy camwhore's rotten vagina?

>>288537

>Banning rampant shitposting is banning "wrongthink"

>ggrevolt literally thinks shitposting is "wrongthink"

lmfao

>>288555

>not specifically "ethics" discussion

>rampant shitposting

> "the solution"

> ggrevolt

I can't control my sides anymore!

> also purging at the demand of the vast majority of the boars described as "betrayal"

/ggrevolt/ you are only worse at projecting yourself on others than SJWs.

>>288561

Look at your own threads. They were pure useless derailings then, they still are now. Look at this thread, look at all other ggrevolt threads in the catalog. All clear derailment. And they only surface when GG is amidst happenings.

This time you came with the UN happenings. It's "almost" like you don't want GG doing productive stuff, anti-narrative efforts, etc. I'm sure it's pure coincidence though.

>>288537

He didn't purge for wrong think. He purged because we asked him to. Thank God he purged you, maybe he should do it again. Look at the growing cancer at the catalog.

It's like your version of free speech is "you can only have speech in /ggrevolt/, you can only talk about boycotts, you may never have peace otherwise"

>>288571

>they call me a bad name

>ban on sight!!!

You guys tried to take charge of KiA by launching attacks against Hat of KiA that failed they doubled down and banned your cancerous asses.

You recently tried that same shit with /hq/

because you somehow think people on here wouldn't notice the similarities between the Hat thing that also failed since no one outside of here and the /v/ general give two shits what /revolt/ or Acid does so run along bck to your containment board.

To the land of E-celeb wank & Cocks

>>288585

>Zan

>into the trash it goes

>>288583

>>>/ggrevolt/56760

You mean we tried to save KiA from their destructive mods?

Even Hatman admits the moderation is shit now.

>>288587

and by we I mean the few of us with reddit accounts who didn't want to see KiA become what it is today.

What is even the point of revolt? The only thing I've ever seen them do is bitch about various ecelebs and acidman. Why are they even here? If they have a problem with the moderation on hq or kia, why do they keep coming back and complaining about it instead of sticking to their own board and getting shit done? Infighting certainly isn't going to accomplish anything.

>>288589

I'm not complaining. I'm asking for Acid Man to hold true to his word, and hand over the keys to gghq

>>288589

What is the point of gghq? What is the point of GamerGate? What is the point of any of this?

#closethegate

>>288571

Revisionist lies. The truth is archived.

>>>/ggis/584

>>288590

> muh GG discussion must be held at GGHQ

> it is the "headquarters" afterall

> ggrevolt is no good

> no where else is good enough

> please give me the keys, I want to be the new Leader

>>288585

Nice. More evidence /ggrevolt/ was as much a DnC effort as any other.

>>288575

Exactly.

They only go after GG people, be them e-celebs, semi-celebs, anons that argue in specific ways by cataloguing them as boogeymen like "ethics cucks" or "scope shills" or whatever.

Their work only brought dwindling numbers. They've been fairly successful at it as a matter of fact. And they got the nerve of saying others are the ones driving people away from GG chan hubs. While their own board numbers are the epitome of their work's success.

>>288605

Citing Zan again. Like he has anything of worth left. We just asked him to be BO and stay anon, that's all anyone asked.

>>288609

What are you talking about? ggr has been steadily at ~100 except for the past week when the board was raided. The numbers aren't dwindling.

>>288608

I want Coleslaw to hold true to his word. He's gone against everything he promised, so now it's time to hand over the keys.

>>288603

Considering anyone could've posted there(including shills), it looks like that was a revisionist history of what happened.

>>288609

Look mod, I know you're defending Acid man here, but you should be thinking a bit harder on what you're doing.

>They only go after GG people, be them e-celebs, semi-celebs, anons that argue in specific ways by cataloguing them as boogeymen like "ethics cucks" or "scope shills" or whatever.

One, you're projecting, or did you forget about "IRCfag", "trianglefag", "revoltard", "ayyteam", and so on?

Two, Acid himself promised to hand off if he fucked up bad enough. if this isn't a bad enough fuck up for you, what is? Can you explain that one to me?

You know this is a straight up shill thread, don't y'all? The only reason why the mods are letting it stay up is because it generates activity on this dying board, keeps UIDs up, and will extend the life of the board for another 72 hours.

I fully expected this thread to be deleted or bumplocked by now, but in the hopes that it will outrage a lurker to comment, they leave it up.

I've been noticing this a lot lately. Really horrible shitposting and bait threads are left up.

>>288610

>Citing Zan again. Like he has anything of worth left. We just asked him to be BO and stay anon, that's all anyone asked

Sure. You accuse your own BO of lying and throw him under the bus for not dramawhoring now you want Acid to "turn over the keys" just like he did. Step your game up troll.

>>288619

>Implying

Look, just like in the other thread, they don't want GGHQ, merely for Acid to step down for one of the anonymous mods.

>>288619

>not dramawhoring

Zan spilled tons of spaghetti. I don't know what you're talking about. He was only in the mod position for under a month and he didn't even do any actual moderation.

Zan isn't the BO now. The current BO is anon, just like I would remain.

>>288615

The Mods might be asleep m8

What time is it in Burgerland anyway?

Its the usual revolttard shill thread they pop on KiA too so its not a /hq/ specific problem.

We could always ask for a Ban on sight order for threads like this and the op who started it

>>288622

And then /revolt/ will be abandoned since there won't be any need for it any more, right?

>>288623

>Zan spilled spaghetti

variloh, endomorphis, s4t, kelly, every single one of your remaining 'ecelebs' is a spaghetti machine, dummy, just Zan at least had enough self respect to see what was happening and walk away. If anything you said was true anons would have naturally migrated to your board but instead you pretend like killing this place will somehow help your little ravioli rebellion. You can't even be proper parasites, your just straight up cancer.

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=gamergatehq

This is why Coleslaw needs to hold true to his word and hand over the keys. I promise to either dismantle the current mod team entirely and pick a new team, or vet the current mods and only fire 6 of them.

Then, the rules will be wiped clean and rewritten by us. Free speech will be endorsed, and banning will be a very very last resort thing. Everyone should have the right to speak and defend themselves.

>>288613

>One, you're projecting, or did you forget about "IRCfag", "trianglefag", "revoltard", "ayyteam", and so on?

Only these aren't boogeymen. They are a reality, here you are to prove it, here are threads made by these "boogeymen" that are still alive in the catalog as we speak.

Revoltards are real, to the point that after we banned you you made a board for yourselves.

https://archive.is/YjKzh

https://archive.is/3w3CK

https://archive.is/FY3eM

Not to mention this one thread we're talking in. Oh, but please, you aren't allowed to discuss these things here. We are not having this discussion right now. You are being censored and we're talking through telepathy.

>>288642

I was just banned nigger. I'm the OP. I was silenced, except for I'm ban evading until I'm banned again.

>>288642

So, obviously dissent is, and always has been, a bannable offense.

>>288641

You're calling free speech a meme? Hi Ghazi.

>>288640

>no one is forced to do anything they don't want to

>make the threads you want to see

>so tyrannical

>much oppression

>ggretards this salty over not being paid attention to

>even when left unbanned they still can't post without getting mad and making ridiculous claims

>don't realize their entire existance revolves around acid man

>don't realize acid is enjoying all the free blowjobs from ggretards

You keep spouting about acid man, you'd probably get on your knees for him irl.

Meanwhile you can't say shit about gghq being obsessed because we don't have multiple threads tracking his evey move like you do. Acid man does nothing for me, the same way hotwheels does nothing for me. They just own the board/site

>>288655

>saging a bumplocked thread

>>288655

And check'd

>>288642

>Still thinking that I'm revolt

>Still engaging in IDpol constantly

Seriously, this is pathetic on your part, in all your walls of text, all you have proven is that shills exist, not even what you are blaming them on.

>>288657

Your opening "argument" is

>Why haven't you bowed out yet?

>Why?– you're a faggot ————

and that ridiculous ggre pic.

Meanwhile now that you got acid man's semen ration and are talking like a big boy you aren't banned. Do you see the difference now? Your opinions are retarded and being destroyed but you aren't banned for them.

>>288661

Did you miss the ban message? >>288657

>>288662

You were banned for the spam in your first post. It's even in that picture you posted. Are you so heated that you can't understand something so simple?

>>288665

It's not spam though. It's Coleslaw's own words

>>288666

And you were banned for your own words. Starting off with "Why haven't you bowed out yet?" over 10 times followed by "Why?– you're a faggot ————" is spam. You haven't been banned since right? Because you aren't spamming.

bump

>>288698

>Hand the board over

kek it just goes to show how desperate they are for attention and power.

>>288698

No /ggrevolt/ is Taiwan, it's free and prosperous, unlike China which is your board.

>>288734

>Free

Unless you disagree even slightly, then prepare to be shouted down.

>Prosperous

Lmfao how many UIDs do you have again?

>>288575

I would also post in /ggrevolt/ if it was about GamerGate.

But it seems more concentrated in fucking /gamergatehq/'s shit.

I also like how OP posted the source of the promise but not the source of the betrayal. Nice job!

>>288728

Wait, that twitter post was by an ayytist? Looks like something a SJW would say.

>>288752

Damn, please mods delete this duplicate post.

>>288736

>Lmfao how many UIDs do you have again?

They were at over 200 earlier this week.

Down to 136 now.

And soon back down to ~100.

>>288698

Dude no one is going to take you fucking seriously anymore after your dox got leaked. We all know of the shit that you do now. You HAVE to step down. If you care about GamerGate and its image you will do this. Its for the greater good

>>288756

I'm not usually one to repurpose memes, but here we go.

>>288698

I don't follow this board so closely, but I think you're doing alright. Definitely not worth stepping down. I'm glad you see that, and will hold the line without giving in.

/ggrevolt/ and /gamergatehq/ can exist together. Pick ur poison.

>>288747

Duplicates have always been removed from ggr. Spam has always been removed.

I'm not saying that this place would have the same exact rules as ggr. We'd work together, all of us, to write new rules. If you think meta threads should be bumplocked, and the consensus agrees, we'll write that into the rules.

You're completely using tyranny wrong.

Wulfgar is representative of me just as much as he is a representative of you, not at all. If you want Wulfgar banned, and most agree, we can do that…. or, take the approach ED forums did…

And again, forced freedom of speech isn't tyranny.

>>288755

Were at 236. To be fair, ggr was getting raided too.

>>288756

>muh degeneracy!!

No one gives a shit about what Coleslaw does in his real life, it's the fact that he doesn't know how to run shit, namefags everywhere, and has called the wrath of the hate machine upon himself.

>>288715

I freely admit that. You also have to take into account that the board was being raided and saw its UIDs increase by 138%. They were informed that dox weren't allowed on ggr, and they went elsewhere. You can remove all the dox in the world from this board or that board, but when there's a hate mob that wants to dox you, they'll go to /baph/ and make it happen, or they'll get the wrong guy, which I highly suspect they did.

>>288728

That's why I would remain anon as the BO. You can't get to the person that you don't know. I'll never even tag my posts as BO.

>>288766

I do care about this board, that's why it's so upsetting to see what you've done to the place, Coleslaw, and I'm asking you to hand over the keys, let fresh blood in.

I already said that this is a straight up shill thread, so what, am I lying about that? I'm shilling for free speech and prosperity.

If hold sand with loose fingers, the grains of sand will slip between your fingers. If you hold that sand with a fist, the grains of sand will be forced between your fingers. You rule with a fist, and don't care to find balance, that's why so many have left you, and why so many hate you.

Oh, your leadership is working, it's working at driving people away.

Ok, I'm saying gghq has value left in it. I must be lying.

The "under new management" sign will bring back the users who were lost due to your ego.

>>288698

This has nothing to do with your dox, Coleslaw. This has to do with the 1000+ users that you drove away, your promise to hand the board over. Blaming all your problems on ggrevolt doesn't make it true.

ggrevolt has open borders and free speech. I was banned for making this thread, remember? Go make this thread in ggr and see how quickly you're banned. Sounds a lot like north Korea….

Now, I'll ask again, will you please hand over the keys, so that gghq can move away from the drama cloud which surrounds you? Uphold your word to us. You betrayed our trust, and have broken your promises. Will you break this promise too?

>>288766

Checked.

And by all means do continue to ignore the douche canoe asking you to give up.

You're doing a fine job, and revolt has actually fallen below the horsefucker board.

Hell, it fell below the argie board.

>>288781

Seriously, your concern trolling is beyond obvious.

And you're an extra special brand of retard if you think anyone here is buying what you're selling, you dumb cunt.

>>288782

Oh hello OppressedFart. Still salty over that tongue lashing Yutt gave you?

>>288782

>our banlist is shorter, that means we're better!

All that list proves is you fags enjoy wallowing in shitposts.

>inb4 lack of decent moderation somehow = free speech argument

>tyranny

>banlist is spammers

If ggretards spammed their own board instead, they wouldn't be on the gghq banlist. I wonder why ggrevolt has no spam

>>288786

ggrevolt ban list is nonexistent

>>288787

ggrevolt has no spam because spamming is against the rules.

1. No dox

2. No spam

3. Global rules

>>288792

>no spam

>no bans

Pick one.

..unless it's so slow and so shit spammers don't even bother.

>>288792

No its because you idiots don't spam your own board up.

What the fuck is wrong with revoltfags? Every time you post its like you are an idiot or willfully ignorant. You post shit that has no logic behind it

>>288794

Users aren't banned.

>>288795

No, people don't feed into trolls, and the trolls give up. Banning, locking, and sage bombing trolls only drives them to keep going.

>>288798

Now you're just making shit up.

Go away, you're not taking over hq no matter how thirsty you niggas get.

>>288799

What am I making up?

>>288735

Pretty she dumped his stupid ass already, try harder faggot.

>>288814

I'm calling for your leader to step down, let me take over the board since he has failed to keep his word, and reunite the users. ggrevolt will die, gghq will flourish.

>>288814

I'm saying that at least 100 will come back. Maybe more. Acid Man has pissed off a lot of people.

>>288819

Look, all Acid Man would even have to do is say he's handing the board over, not do it, fire half the mods, change the rules, never tripfag again, and no one would even know he's still in the BO position.

>>288822

Where were you when the GG board on 8chan banned freedom of speech?

I remember it greatly. I said, "Hey Acid, this purge is really fucked up. You're banning people for dissenting opinions."

(USER WAS BANNED FOR LYING ABOUT THE RULES)

>>288817

Stop calling him our leader.

It's disingenuous as fuck.

He's the goddamned BO.

And nobody wants some non accountable asshole like you, who's biggest achievement seems to be concern trolling and playing in their own shit.

Revolt is a fucking toilet and we don't want hq to be anything like it.

What part about that don't you get?

>>288819

If you mean your fellow revoltards, don't bother.

We don't want you.

>>288826

Rather telling how long it always takes them to respond to shit, isn't it? It's like these faggots assume we all have the attention span of goldfish or something so they won't get called on their revisionist bullshit. Pretty fucking pathetic.

Even if everything OP said was true, it's patently obvious that the only reason he gives a fuck about someone else's board is that this board has more views than his.

You're telling someone else how to run their board. You are not saving GG. This board is not GG. Your board is not GG. They are privately operated boards that each discuss GG and have their own rules. Why does every board that discusses GG have to do it your way? Is there not enough room on the internet for both?

And again, even if this false dichotomy was true, I'd rather deal with censorship than the people who post on GGR, so I post here. Why should I not be allowed to visit a board that does what I want it to do?

Even if everything OP said was true, it's patently obvious that the only reason he gives a fuck about someone else's board is that this board has more views than his.

You're telling someone else how to run their board. You are not saving GG. This board is not GG. Your board is not GG. They are privately operated boards that each discuss GG and have their own rules. Why does every board that discusses GG have to do it your way? Is there not enough room on the internet for both?

And again, even if this false dichotomy of HQ=censorship,GGR=freedom was true, I'd rather deal with censorship than the people who post on GGR, so I post here. Why should I not be allowed to visit a board that does what I want it to do?

>>288826

I call him your leader because he decides what is discussed, he decides what threads are removed or bumplocked, he decides who is banned.

The board should be community driven, not Acid Man driven.

Did I say that I would make this board a mirror image of revolt? I think there's a balance to be had.

>>288827

Sorry, I was on the road.

>>288829

I wasn't saying my way, I was saying community lead.

>>288830

>losing more than half your visitors because you purged them

>ever

You fucked up, own up to it. You claimed that you didn't have an ego, but you're the most egotistical user on 8chan.

>>288831

I care because this was the main reason I came to 8chan before the purge. When you ban dissenting opinions(reminder: I was banned for the OP), you create a hugbox with people who only share the same views as you. Different opinions help you rethink things, formulate better strategy, and it's good to just talk to someone who just agrees with you on everything.

>>288832

Because this was their board too. We were a part of /gg/ and /gamergate/ too. Namefag BOs let people get to them, and they burnt out.

Your leader here is an ego maniac. If his ego wasn't so inflated, he would be able to look at his mistakes and realize that maybe he should step down. Instead, he's going to remain at the helm of this board until it's dead.

>>288833

Please, ints or whoever raided ggrevolt too. Why do you think the UIDs shot up 138%?

They like raiding competing boards and blaming the other board.

>>288834

*someone who doesn't just agree with you on everything

>>288836

There will always be shitposting. I think it would probably pick up initially because trolls will want to test the waters.

I wouldn't guide shit, the community would. It's the community's job to spot the legit shills.

This board needs fresh air breathed into it.

This plan >>288821 is just as good as handing the keys to me.

>>288838

No really, I am trying to wrap my head around this. Of what difference would you make as a BO as opposed to acid man? What would you do differently? And what would those differences do to sway me into doing things I am currently unwilling to do?

>>288834

I like this board as it is. Why should I have to accept your terms or move?

>>288840

First off, I would remain anon.

Second, banning users is extremely petty, especially when evading bans is so easy. All it does is start my post history over, so bans would be a last resort, like if someone is actually spamming, and you need to stop them for a minute while you clean up.

Make the rules less open for interpretation.

>No shilling

What's shilling?

>Whatever we want it to be.

Less opportunity for mod abuse. Look at the ban list and the mod logs for this board. That's just absurd and a slap in the face to anyone who's used an image board. People left 4chan to get away from over moderation.

>>288839

I already know you're not going to hand over the board. You're in charge here, you're going to lead this place to victory, you didn't do anything wrong.

Fuck, even hatman can admit that he completely fucked up and that's why KiA is such shit today.

>>288841

To gain back the users who quit visiting here. A lot of people quit coming here and went to KiA before the purge because the moderation was too strict.

And to rejuvenate the board. Too much focus and not enough fun made this board really dry.

I'll admit, watching users dig into Coleslaw's online history was funny up until they wanted to dox him. Honestly, I don't even think they found the right guy, and there's some 44 year old man getting calls from gay prostitutes.

>>288843

That dude is creepy as fuck. I don't trust him or s4t with anything.

s4t might've started the Op Take Back the Truth, but then he gets all spergy about it and wants to take credit for the whole thing. Red texting and caps lock about how it was all him.

>>288842

That's a decent start to a generalized overview. Now what are your plans for the rest of it? I would like a detailed description of how you would do anything differently. As it stands, the only thing you have said is

>anon

>I won't ban

This is basically ggrevolt, and that already exists.

>>288843

Oh, and s4t and endo got into a crazy feud on ggrevolt two weeks ago. Both of them flipping IPs to pretend to be other people across 3, no 4 different threads, drove the UIDs up by 50. Crazy fucking sperg fight.

>>288847

Let the community decide the rules as they come, and set a limit on the amount of rules. Leave no room for interpretation, so there's no lawyering around the rules to push an agenda.

>>288842

>I would run this board exactly how /ggrevolt/ is ran.

That is what you just said.

Big shocker: Nobody here wants that shit or they'd already be on revolt. Its also kinda funny that you call attention to the mod logs when everyone has access to them, and most of our regular users know what those mod actions are and were for.

Justify why everyone else has to follow your preferred rules instead of their own. And while you're at it, justify why the users on this board don't have the right to tell you to fuck off and have mods make it stick?

You faggots had a home here right up until you tried to burn it down from the inside out. So you went to build a paradise board of your own and made

EXACTLY

the kind of shit-stinking cesspool that everyone else was trying to save this board from becoming.

You in every way proved them, and to a lesser extent because I was fool enough to try rapproach with some of you me, right.

>>288850

Again, that's pretty much revolt. I don't go there because the complete lack of moderation makes it extremely easy for people to turn it into e-celeb and offtopic general.

>>288852

See what I mean? You have this Jesus complex. You're going to save this board, you're going to lead everyone to the promised land.

I said the rules would be decided upon by the community.

Justify my ban for making this OP then.

Pro-tip: you can't. I was banned for wrongthink against the leader.

>>288854

Revolt has no rules, except no dox and no spam. I'm saying let the community decide the rules, not some dictator.

>>288855

I'll draft up a plan to get this board rebooted if you're genuine about handing the board over.

Honestly, I started this thread to piss you off. You've gone back on your own words so many times, why would you ever hold true to this word?

And the rules wouldn't be exactly the same, because I would be trying to gain back the users who abandoned ship because of the rules and drama surrounding you.

>>288858

And once again I am saying it breeds e-celebs and offtopic. This is the third time I have asked you what you would do differently to sway me.

>>288860

samefag here, on PC, different IP.

The rules wouldn't be the same because i would want all sides to reunite, here, the longest running GG board.

>>288858

>I'll draft up a plan to get this board rebooted if you're genuine about handing the board over.

"You have to vote for it to see what's in it"

Anyone else having obamacare debates flashbacks?

>I'm saying let the community decide the rules

We voted on them.

Pretending otherwise does your argument no credit whatsoever.

>not some dictator

Like you're trying to do right now?

"Give up the board, Acid, or we'll shit it up incessantly, and do everything we can to make you quit!"

That's you.

That's literally what you and your fellow revoltards are doing.

Just fuck off already, you're not going to get your way.

>>288859

If you like the rules the way they are, then what is there that would sway you??

>I like my bed, why should I switch?

What would you like to see done differently?

>>288862

>"Give up the board, Acid, or we'll shit it up incessantly, and do everything we can to make you quit!"

nice strawman.

I haven't posted on this board since the year anniversary, "lax rules weekend" and was banned. kek.

>>288863

As I have said before I would like to see a clear and expressed ruleset for what you are purposing. As I have said, what has been stated beforehand is just revolt, which doesn't fly. Can you please provide a descript ruleset for what you want this or your board to be

>>288865

you think if the users who left for /v/ and /ggr/ came back, the community would decide upon the same rules?

>>288861

/ggrevolt/ will never post here because their rampant shitposting is not allowed.

Also

>Implying the board wouldn't be instantly flooded with ”HAHAHHA ETHICS CUCKS RULE CUCKS BTFO BTFO" if they were allowed free reign

>>288861

It's obvious you just want to be board owner.

Why does it fucking matter?

You're here, your "banned for opinions" shit has been disproven, and no one believes your bullshit. You have failed to convince a single person ITT. You are a troll who got outed and now you are trying to play "good cop."

You've been here for hours, I went to fucking work and came back and you are still spewing your shit. Go back to your containment board, and make sure to screencap this to show how much of a good faggot shill you've been.

>>288866

check'd

Shitposting threads, allow one to stay up at a time.

Multiple threads on the same person, bumplock the newer ones and allow one to stay up, even if it is "off-topic" drama fills the spaces between the happenings.

mods put on a leash. If a mod is continuously making bad decisions, they should be fired. I don't know if Mod2 is the same, but I'd definitely fire his ass.

>>288868

They won't post here currently because dissent is banned. i.e. I was banned for the OP because it would hurt Coleslaw's feelz.

>>288870

>If the rules aren't the way I like, then obviously the community didn't get a say in them!

nice stawman.

>>288871

see >>288821 this would work just as well. It doesn't have to be me.

>your "banned for opinions" shit has been disproven,

I was banned for the OP, disprove that.

>>288873

>Nobody here wants that shit or they'd already be on revolt.

I said it wouldn't be revolt, community drive, not Acid Man driven.

>>288872

The alternative is to just b& them outright oh noes, le censorship :^) or let them cover the board in their revisionist history bullshit and keep trying to push people out.

Come back tomorrow, its going into containment in the morning.

>>288781

>We'd work together, all of us, to write new rules. If you think meta threads should be bumplocked, and the consensus agrees, we'll write that into the rules.

So, hand you the keys so that everything remains the same? No thanks, at least I know how much I can trust that things will remain the same if we actually keep them the way they are.

> And again, forced freedom of speech isn't tyranny.

Like forced democracy isn't bad? Tell that to Iraq.

>>288855

I hope you're not really considering what these guys are saying. We all know it's a lie, they always only used lies, this thread is another evidence of that, fallacies, revisionism, and thirst for power. I have no reason to trust this would be any different from ggrevolt.

>>288877

>I was banned for the OP, disprove that.

Let's see the OP:

>Why haven't you bowed out yet? sixteen fucking times

>you're a faggot

WOW! What did you get banned for, spamming? I never would have guessed!

Eat a dick

>>288872

>(1)

Actually, I'd say this thread was more about the thirsty doofus who keeps demanding he be made the BO.

And I doubt many ITT would disagree with me.

>>288877

And what about funposting threads to death? That was allowed on /gamergate/. would that be allowed?

>>288884

See, leaderfagging still.

>>288881

Would you rather me have wrote "140 characters" over and over?

>>288877

>dissent is banned!

If you say it enough times that makes it true!!!

>>288886

Having you write something that wasn't complete bullshit would have been nice.

>>288880

You think all the rules would end up the same if we wiped the slate?

Sadam was democratically elected, just saying. He also had US support.

>>288884

>Is this some kind of debate tactics where you try to demonstrate all of your extra chromosomes at once

You're fighting with a revolttard. These guys post ridiculous shit here then screencap it and say "HEY LOOK AT WHAT WAS POSTED IN GGHQ" then start sucking each others dicks pretending that totally wasn't one of them who posted it.

>>288885

You started this thread

>>288886

I'd rather you not post at all, and if you do actually start of with something that makes sense and isn't obvious trollshit. You got banned and you came back butthurt and pretending you had something to say all along that wasn't shit. This is the worst case of troll's remorse I've ever seen.

>>288867

>you think if the users who left for /v/ and /ggr/ came back, the community would decide upon the same rules?

Yes, because the rules were decided before they were enforced and GGR was created.

>>288858

>See what I mean? You have this Jesus complex. You're going to save this board, you're going to lead everyone to the promised land.

Debatable. However, that is exactly what you are proposing in this thread.

>>288845

>To gain back the users who quit visiting here. A lot of people quit coming here and went to KiA before the purge because the moderation was too strict.

But I don't believe that people will come back to this board. And I like this board as it is. Given this understanding, why must I accept your terms? Would I have your blessing to run a GG-related board with the rules from this board? If so, why doesn't Acid have that right as well? Is it possibly because you just want to annex HQ because it has more traffic? How should I proceed if I think you're misguided and think Acid is a fine BO?

I continue to not understand why you can't run GGR the way you want and let us run GGHQ the way we want. If people were going to return due to bad moderation, would they not have returned to GGR already? We've changed boards many times now, so clearly that isn't the barrier.

>>288893

I'm not going to waste my time laying out the groundwork to reanimate this board when Acid Man has no intentions of handing over the keys. His rule, his law. He'll be the BO of this board until he's the last person here.

>>288880

>I hope you're not really considering

Not in the slightest. What I've found with these assclowns is that they get into this sort of teenaged fuzzy logic where everything will just work out if I get my way. Or alternatively, they think they can worry about the details later.

So question them on specifics. Hard specifics that don't have an easy or immediate answer. And they fall apart and either can't respond or try to change the subject like our faggot friend here.

I threw the exact scenario this board once faced at him, only reversing the positions of the GGHQ and /gg/ crowd, and he didn't have an answer.

I know the whole thing is a waste of time, but our digging instructor isn't ready for the big thread yet and I have some time to kill.

>>288894

Then why are you still here?

Nobody here is interested in what you're proposing, so why don't you just piss off already?

Because you're a fucking troll, that's why.

>>288895

>everything will just work out if I get my way.

that seems to be working so well for you so far. This board is soon to drop below 300.

>>288897

you just said you aren't even considering it, so why would I entertain you with a way to get gghq back on track and reunite the anons that you, yourself, pissed off and either forced out or they left because of you?

Are you that dense?

>>288898

And revolt has already fallen past the Argie board.

What's your point?

>>288896

To see if Acid would hold true to his word, or leave another promise broken.

I even said it didn't have to be me. I even said it could just be Acid and "pretend" to hand the board over to anon.

He has to tripfag, he has to be in charge, he has to be in the spotlight.

>>288899

>why would I entertain you

You're still here aren't you? Are you not our entertainment to point and laugh at?

>>288901

Just come off it already, nobody here is buying that shit.

>>288900

ggr has been at ~100 for the past two months. The extra 138 UIDs came from back to back raids. First, Sargon sicked his followers on the board because Variloh pissed him off or something, or was it someone calling him out on that ghostbin? I forget. And then ints or whoever.

>>288903

Why would I offer you a solution that would just be ignored?

Here's a solution >>288821

But you couldn't even do that, because you're a fucking ego maniac that has to be the leader. you've gone against everything you stated when you took all the refugees from /gamergate/

>>288904

He's already stated that he has no intentions of listening to me or handing over the board.

The only reason this thread is still up is because there's probably lurkers throwing in their $0.02 and keeping the UIDs up for another 72 hours.

>>288902

At the very least he's helping to keep the pph count up, so there is that.

>>288903

>Still not seeing a solution, just more complaints.

>>288906

>Why would I offer you a solution that would just be ignored?

Wait a minute I've seen this before.

Vid related, 9:30 mark.

>>288907

>The only reason this thread is still up is because there's probably lurkers throwing in their $0.02 and keeping the UIDs up for another 72 hours.

>>288906

And we the board users have said repeatedly that you are full of shit and Acid's doing a fine job, but you aren't listening.

>>288908

I've already said, anon BO, rewrite the rules, allow our lost brothers back in that were driven away by acid man.

I even presented a way where acid man could do it without even handing over the keys

>>288909

You have nothing to offer but circular arguments and outright lies, go away.

>>288910

He's doing a fine job at bleeding away the userbase of this board.

>>288911

Revoltards aren't our brothers, they're shit we flushed out and we would prefer they stayed gone.

>>288914

They were with you in /gg/ and /gamergate/, why would you want them gone?

>>288913

There are multiple reasons for the slowdown, not just your dishonest and autistically harped upon ones.

We do not care what you say or want, most of us think Acidman is a good BO, and you are deliberately not addressing that.

>>288915

Because they stopped caring about GG.

I've browsed that toilet, it's all shitposting, e-celeb wankery, and bitching about how Acid hurt their feels.

Fuck them, and fuck you to.

>>288916

>We do not care what you say or want

and that's why this board lost 1300 users. coleslaw didn't listen and kicked out anyone who didn't like the way he was running things.

Coleslaw will run this board into the ground, he's gone back on every word he's given.

>>288920

Ok.

You're still a tard, and you and revolt can suck shit-water through a straw.

Fuck off already.

>>288919

>I'm not going to listen to anything you have to say.

>Now tell me what you have to say.

such logic.

>>288920

>>288923

>gghq is slowing down because of bans

I would post a crying child here but I beat myself to it 20 hours ago.

>>288536

>>288921

Ok. I laid out a plan to kill ggrevolt, but it's like you want it to keep going. In order to kill revolt, you'd have to make this place welcoming again for opinions that go against the groupthink, and get rid of the tripfag BO. I even laid out how this would be possible with Acid Man staying the BO.

>>288924

some users who weren't even caught up in the purge came to ggr because they were disgusted by the purge.

>>288923

Why continue with this charade?

You're not convincing anyone you're right, and your circular arguments, misrepresentation, and ignoring pertinent questions just says you're a lying prick here to troll and be ridiculed.

If you really cared about GG you'd be doing something actually useful or productive instead of this pointless trolling.

You revoltards are all the same.

>>288926

I'm not the BO, so it's not my board. It's not even the BO's board. The BO was locked out of his account for over a week and no one even noticed.

ggr hasn't been losing numbers like your board. Been at a steady ~100 for months. Your board has dropped what, 200 over the past few months?

>/ggrevolt/

HA!

Fuck you guys.

The one time I went to /ggrevolt/, the OP was lying about shit and ignoring people calling him out with proof he was lying about shit, everyone in that thread was just slurping up the bullshit calling for boycotts and claiming shills.

Yeah, /ggrevolt/ isn't a solution.

>>288925

No, you dribbled some bullshit about Acid giving up board ownership, and flatly refused to answer certain specifics.

You are in no position to make demands here.

And revolt could go away anytime you felt like pulling the plug on that shitpile.

We don't want to associate with them, and you are deliberately refusing to address that point.

>>288929

And those ~100 asswipes are not welcome here.

What part of that do you not understand?

We don't care about them.

We don't care about what you want or think either, especially since you've proven that you're a disingenuous, lying prick.

>>288927

>Autismos get triggered by a guy saying "No more shitposting so ridiculously!"

>>288930

no one has called for a boycott in months. The only thing that was wanted was certain topics to not be banned on sight.

>>288932

I was just asking Acid to hand over the keys and hold up to his word. Even with this shit post thread being the most active thing in your catalog all day, your number are still dropping.

>>288928

>I'm going to ignore every solution you offer

>now tell me your solutions so I can ignore them some more.

Why would I even bother?

>>288920

>He's been running this board for over a year

>"He's going to run it into the ground!!!!"

>>288935

And yet you're still here.

Thanks for the improved pph, ass.

We need to archive this thread to use it as a reason to never listen to what a revoltfag says.

>>288945

still applicable to why this board lost so man.

Drama fills the spaces between happenings. You banned drama.

Coleslaw lied, gghq died.

>>288947

*so many

>>288947

Plenty of drama on your own board, why don't you fuck off back to it already?

What exactly do you think you're accomplishing, beyond looking like an ass?

>>288949

Revoltards aren't GG at this point, they're drama seeking idiots determined to bore us to death with circular logic and easily disproven lies.

>>288951

>>288954

Why wouldn't you want to reunite all the anons involved?

Basically what I've been saying this entire thread is

>anon BO

>doesn't matter if it's me or Acid pretending he handed over the board

>rewrite the rules

>users come back to check out the place under new management

>kills ggrevolt

It's like you want ggrevolt to stay alive and bitter about the purge.

>>288955

That's exactly right.

Congratulations, you finally understand.

We want you and those fucksticks to stay in your own little cesspit, and leave us alone.

You can have al the rule free shitposting you want, and we don't have to deal with your incessant stupidity.

Glad you finally understand, now please fuck off.

>>288958

Coleslaw, let's say I did present a perfect plan to reunite disenfranchised anons back with this board and be a better BO, would you hand over the keys?

You already said no, so why entertain your questions?

>>288958

Heck, do the fake handover, rewrite the rules, and let it ride for a month. This board is sinking anyway, why not try something different?

>>288960

And we're saying we don't want them back, so fuck you and the horse you rode up on.

>>288963

Not just ggrevolt, dingus, any of the disenfranchised anons.

>>288965

I'm perfectly fine with them not coming back.

This board does not have to be the be all end all of GG, and quite frankly, if they haven't come back by now, they probably wouldn't under ANY circumstances, so changing out board owners (or pretending to) isn't gonna do anything but give some disgruntled assholes on revolt something to crow about.

The so called "proposals" won't magically restore the general publics waning interest in a 1 year old+ online movement.

At best, it'd attract the kind of shitheads we already agreed on getting rid of, necessitating their eventual removal again.

>>288967

>Then put up or shut up.

He already tried with /gamergateb/ and gave up after 5 minutes. :^)

>>288967

Well, I manage another board just fine. All you have to do is not be retarded, and you're a step up from your moderation.

>>288962

I didn't read it all, but

>We don't hate you, /ggrevolt/. If you want to stand with us, come home.

Yep, that's why I was banned and told to fuck off.

>>288973

What rules am I breaking, rulecuck?

Edit:

>besides meta outside the meta thread

>self-admittedly trolling

>drama outside the sticky

>and ban evasion

in just this one thread.

>>288972

This board is on a crash course with 0 PPW, why not try something new?

>>288975

>Decisively lose an argument

>Resort to insults

Next you're gonna say you were just trolling the entire time!

>>288978

I've offered a plan of action, Coleslaw said continuously he's ignoring anything I say, users here would rather this board sink to the bottom that reunite with those disenfranchised.

>>288976

Because you aren't proposing anything new.

You want this board to have basically the same rules and moderation that revolt already has.

And we're saying you're a dumbass if you think that will do anything beyond making it a shithole just like revolt.

It will not magically restore the greater public at large's interest in GG as a whole.

It will attract the fucksticks we already got rid of, and that does not interest anyone here.

>>288980

You offered a "plan" but never explained anything about it, never answered any questions, now you're getting mad at us for not believing in your oh so brilliant scheme.

Fuck off back to your containment thread.

>>288980

>users here would rather this board sink to the bottom that reunite with those disenfranchised

That is exactly correct.

Now go away already.

>>288981

the board is losing numbers daily. The only reason it jumped about 50 was because of the /ints/ raid that hit both boards.

>>288983

I didn't answer any questions because Coleslaw already said he'd disregard anything I had to say.

But if he's genuine about handing over BO position, then I'll draft up a plan. It wouldn't be written just by me of course. The board should be community driven, and the community should have a say.

>>288985

>I didn't answer any questions because Coleslaw already said he'd disregard anything I had to say.

So why are you still here, faggot?

>>288985

>the board is losing numbers daily

So what.

Turning this board into a carbon copy of revolt will not attract anyone we want here, just the asshats we already got rid of.

>>288987

and you're losing people who aren't just asshats.

>>288986

boosting your PPH and UIDs by 3. This board will live just a little bit longer, thanks to me.

>>288987

>carbon copy of revolt

No, ggr is too lax, while gghq is too strict. A middle ground can be found.

>>288989

>you have to vote for it to see what's in it

Seriously, this guy could be a congressman with that kind of thinking.

>>288991

I'm not saying hand over the keys, then I'll draft something up, I'm saying that if we can draft up something good enough, would he hand over the keys?

If not

why bother

>>288990

>Shitposting in a single thread is saving the board!!!

Sounds like someone has a Jesus complex

>>288990

We'd be losing them anyway, because if the rules and moderation here were actually the problem, then revolt or the thread on /v/ would be taking up the slack, which they aren't.

Your argument is bullshit.

>>288995

look, if you're being genuine about handing over the keys, and reuniting the disenfranchised, then we'll have a roundtable discussion on how to fix gghq. If not, then why even bother?

>>288996

>give me what i want, and we'll talk about it

Seriously, nigger?

>>288992

So this isn't even about making the boards better, it's about you trying to get Acidman to leave

I get that you're obsessed with him as a revoltfag, but why?

>inb4 muh banned for opinions!!! (false)

>inb4 he avatarfags!!! (No one cares)

>inb4 he has faggy tendencies!!! (So does everyone)

>>288995

This isn't about them not being able to follow rules. Acid Man hurt their little autistic shitposter feelings by banning autistic shitposting from his board, so now their entire lives revolve around doing everything they can to make sure he leaves.

>>288996

Because you claim to have a plan but have shown us literally nothing.

Elaborate or get the fuck out.

>inb4 more "Oh I have an amazing super awesome plan that will totally fix everything but I won't tell anyone unless Acidman publicly promises that he'll make me BO once I post it!"

>>288999 (Dubs and Trips Check'd)

Dude

For real.

Either he Elaborates on his amazing genius plan, or he GTFOs

>>288998

>Because you claim to have a plan but have shown us literally nothing.

1. anon BO, either acid goes anon or new BO

2. rewrite the rules, with the community involved

3. the board will be community driven, not BO or moderator driven

It's that simple.

>>288999

What users of this board? the 300 who are left out of the 1800 who were here? What about the 100 from ggr? They were users of this board too.

>>289000

Checked and rechecked.

That tool's got nothing.

He's been arguing in circles for at least two hours, and has nothing to show for it but making our pph higher, and making himself look an utter tard.

wasn't this board at 900 around the time of the purge?

>>289001

>1. Get rid of Acid Man

Because he hurt your fee fees

2. Rewrite the rules, with the community involved

We already did that, those are called the current rules.

>3. This board will be community driven

How is it not already? Do you not understand how these boards work?

Are you legitimately autistic? I am asking with the utmost sincerity.

>>289001

1 is stupid and unnecessary

2 is ignoring the fact we already did that

3 is already in effect, unless you're a butthurt revoltard

You're that dense.

>>289004

When the BO decides what can and cannot be talked about, then that is not community driven.

I even laid out a way to keep your beloved Acid Man as the BO, just not as a leader.

I wasn't involved in writing the rules, I never agreed to them. I was here when /gg/ started to fall off the top 25. Then I left because of hotpockets. Came back just in time to see the purge.

>>289007

>When the BO decides what can and cannot be talked about, then that is not community driven.

Lmfao you're still fucking salty about no one wanting in on your boycott threads, and you spamming them and having such a violent shitfit about no one listening to you that they were outright banned entirely.

>I wasn't involved in writing the rules, I never agreed to them.

You were outvoted by everyone else. Deal with it.

>>289007

>I wasn't involved in writing the rules, I never agreed to them

Sounds like a personal problem to me, pal.

I was, and I did.

And Acid doesn't decide what we can and can't talk about, we did when we drew up the rules you weren't here for.

Stop pretending it went down differently, you're just making yourself look like either a complete dipshit, or a lying jackass.

>>289003

It was around 700-800 right before the purge, jumped up to 900 shortly after, and then continued to drop at the same rate.

>>289011

so, you voted for the rule "no lying about the rules?"

You voted for the rule "not talking shit about KiA?"

i was banned once for talking shit about KiA moderators because of "muh defeatism"

>>289009

And to clarify, people, the "community" asked Acid to ban boycott threads, for various reasons with explanations of why a lot of people were against boycotts.

Not even SJWs try to rewrite history this hard.

>>289012

Not quite true, but close.

We bled off at a rate of almost 700 UIDs a month at the time of the purge. The night we did it we had just over 900. We lost some from the threads we cleared from the catalog and we were at 840 when it was over. Later that week we climbed back to a peak of about 1000, before slowly decreasing, losing 700 more over the next five months.

The purge didn't bring out old users back like I had hoped, but it slowed the bleed to about a fifth of what it was before.

>>289013

>No lying about the rules

This rule was brought about specifically because of people like you that pretend things are different from what they are so you can play the victim.

>"not talking shit about KiA"

https://8ch.net/gamergatehq/rules.html

Hmm, don't see that rule in there.

And we're back to the reason we have the "No lying about the rules" rule.

Like seriously dude, how stupid are you to think that this is working?

>>289016

>See also: Defeatism

>>289018

>"gamergate totally lost u guise!!!"

>"omg gamergate is so over time to give up everything guise!!!"

omg muh censorship

>>289016

https://archive.is/aQu1K#selection-55.102-55.158

>shilling is explicitly bannable at mods' discretion.

>>289020

or just saying "The KiA mods are fucking faggots."

>Defeatism!!!!!

>>289024

Can we bumplock this thread yet

>>289024

That was pre-purge. I've wiped my HD since then.

>>289025

Its getting the axe in the morning anon.

>>289026

How convenient.

does anyone have a copy of /gg/ or /gamergate/'s rules?

>>289027

why not let it ride? It's the most activity your board has gotten all week.

>>289031

Because it would make you mad c:

>>289031

Because it would make you sperg out harder c:

>>289034

He thinks you're a tyrant that makes all the rules and bans everyone personally

Because he's a revoltfag, and is actually that retarded.

>>289037

>implying I haven't been banned by coleslaw personally because I hurt his feelz

>>289036

Want me to boost your board by about 50 UIDs? Is that what you're saying?

>>289039

>le listen and bleliebe

Show us, faggot

>inb4 "Lol this thread that totally isn't spam"

>>289043

Nigger, I'll put this board back at number 4 spot if you want.

>>289046

Oh, they were talking about sperging out. I've got until 7 am, and if they want a spergout, I'd give them a 4 hour spergout

>>288967

The purge was in response to censorship you fucking moron. Expressing misgivings about the purge means you validated those harassers. It destroys our narrative and gives the left-wing SJWs an exploit against our board.

>>289049

I've been clear with my intentions this entire thread.

Given the chance Coleslaw would honor his word(pro-tip: he never does), I offered up suggestions to get the board back on tract. He asked for a detailed plan after he said he wasn't going to take anything I had to say into consideration, so I did not offer a detailed plan.

What would be the point if he wouldn't even consider it?

>>289048

It wasn't censorship.

It was boycottfags getting BTFO by basically everyone telling them it was a stupid idea, and them deciding to shit the bed and spam threads, shitposting profusely, and general retardation.

I was one of the people who said to flush those assholes out of here.

And who the fuck cares what SJW's think.

We were never going to win the PR war, especially with 99% of the MSM against us from the start.

>>289051

To prove you had nothing, and you gracefully obliged.

>>289053

That's HW being diplomatic. Without global "rulecucks" this site would be 99% CP

>>289058

No, I slept for 6 hours. Was on the road for two hours, not posting. Cooked and ate dinner. And even called out that furfag here >>288781

the ironic thing is that all of this acid man bashing has changed my opinion of him from him being invisible to me to wanting to stand behind him, simply because his enemies are annoying me.

congrats ggr; was making me an acid fanboy part of your master plan?

I don't get /ggrevolt/

They don't really want /gghq/ to come to their board

Think about it

They're outnumbered 3:1 by people they've come to completely despise(rulecucks,ethics cucks,people who don't think offtopic things should be allowed)

What happens if people who have a different opinion than /ggrevolt/ goes to /ggrevolt/ and starts saging/dub spamming all threads they don't like?

What happens when your precious hugbox of anti e-celeb/anti ethics is breached by people who call you morons for these views and outnumber you?

If /gamergatehq/ dies today and goes to /ggrevolt/ it will be like a migrant crisis. We'd fuck over your precious country,and you wouldn't even have any means to defend yourselves because the police(Read:mods) have a policy of non intervention.

You're truly the /intl/ of Gamergate.You have the exact same fucking complains

>>289087

You fucking idiot, that is the whole point of ggrevolt, it is the users board, the logic of why people left is users here could post their opinions on revolt without intervention and criticise anything they like, but people who disagreed with moderation here had to fuck off.

The users make the board.

>>289096

And in the case of revolt, the users made it into a pile of dysfunctional shit.

>>288766

Pretty much what I learned with this debacle

>>289096

>You fucking idiot, that is the whole point of ggrevolt

And the whole point of Social Justice is the well being of people. But we know that's not what it's really about, don't we?

>>288885

> I can argue, but you can't answer

> Else you're leaderfagging

Get a load of these guys

>>288940

I have a bunch of them if you want:

https://archive.is/F5ZHe

https://archive.is/TEAQf

https://archive.is/75BJe

https://archive.is/htyPt

https://archive.is/Wr5kS

https://archive.is/5MQ2M

https://archive.is/LcVX1

https://archive.is/YjKzh

https://archive.is/3w3CK

https://archive.is/FY3eM

>>288943

That thread was priceless, full of what would eventually become ggrevoltfags getting BTFO. If I'm not mistaken it's one of the archived threads here: >>289108

>>289096

And I'm saying none of you really want us to come there and fuck you over.

You've all found a nice little niche of being batshit fucking insane and I've tried posting there on occasion.

Your board openly sneers at most shit that makes Gamergate Gamergate, especially matters of gaming journalism and ethics which you are all convinced that anti GG cucked us into caring about.

>>288962

>>288967

>>288999

purge them

The problem here is that, while it's ok to let them try to make a case, just like the other time we're way past that point, and the circular broken logic is already on it's 10th repeat. There is a moment in which enough is enough, and this is also already past.

Let's get back to discussing non-meta shit, and if needed, purge these sly lieing revoltards.

>>289080

>>Try not to get in my way, faggot.

Is that from an official translation?

>>289133

>The problem here is that, while it's ok to let them try to make a case, just like the other time we're way past that point, and the circular broken logic is already on it's 10th repeat. There is a moment in which enough is enough, and this is also already past.

Like this thread for instance. The same guy posted the same fallacies for hours and hours.

>>288698

>Do you seriously believe that anyone else buys, even for a second, that it wasn't revolt who promulgated all this?

Oh boy shifting the blame for your faults to something 50 autists who at most shitposted about e-celebs and have no power to do anything other then bicker. You seriously think that minute thing drove people away?

Jesus Christ if KiA and other morons here seriously defend all of your actions then GG might as well be fucking done with on 8chan with this infestation of weak willed, spineless, sneaky fucks controlling the moderation.

You are not the leader of GamerGate. Your policies go against everything GamerGate was made for, this coming from an anon who has been here since day fucking 1. The anons are the leaders of GamerGate and always have been, now stop with the retarded moderation and pretending that you solely lead anyone here you autistic fuck. You don't keep GG going, anons do and they will continue to do so.

Step down and let someone become owner who's not /v/ or HW cabal and/or actually wants to be open to all discussion and away from board operations. Enough of this retarded need for power, you and the volunteer team do next to nothing good for GG and you know it. Enough lies, if you care about GG do whats right.

>>289178

> been here since day fucking 1

wolffucker pls go

>>289196

>wolffucker

What?

>>289178

Look at the disruption that a handful of revoltards managed to make on this board these recent weeks with this non-happening and, yes, it's pretty self-evident that 50 can make a shitstorm, especially if mods allows it to go on for almost 2 months expecting some good faith from their part.

I'm laughing because this lame as fuck attack would have made SJWs run to their safe spaces.

Protip: We're not SJWs. Come up with a better one.

>>289178

>I am the leader of GamerGate. I say what goes on here step down and *whawhaaahwahhaAcidCuckhwahaaawhahh* ect…

You have nothing reasonable, interesting, or even relevant to bring to the table here at /GamerGateHQ/; shut up go shit up your own board you long-winded egotist.

>>289298

When did I ever say a leader was singular? I thought GG was supposed to be structured so that everyone is the leader of GG? Why is this different now? Also nice ad hominem pal. I'll ask you the same thing, what do you bring to the table? Cause I bet only 1% of posters here actually come up with campaigns and all that but like the other 99% I still email and discuss operations when I still can. No more single leader bullshit on HQ, its killing the board and the community on 8chan. Either have Acid step away from moderation if he wants to still continue helping out, or have him be impartial to board activities. You shouldn't be able to have both because bias kills and its evident now that 75% of GG followers from when HQ was created are now gone from 8chan entirely.

>>289243

What shitstorm? The threads from what I saw were contained to the off topic or meta thread and one thread on the catalog, two if you count the falseflag threads. Everything else was going as usual, revolt didn't do anything it was just the one autist on /baph/. If anything the overreaction was worse then the doxxing and now everyone is paranoid and mods are more banhappy then ever.

>>289242

I only ever heard about that furfag on /b/ two weeks ago, so yeah I'm not him.

>>289261

Protip: you're already in your safe space. Good job defending your champion, Acid Man.