Is Disney Trying to Censor the 'Net?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Is Disney Trying to Censor the 'Net? Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 15:28:35 a5cf72 No.288648

That was a rhetorical question

Citations:

https://archive.is/TMQN5

https://archive.is/qg9A9

https://archive.is/9Y5Un

https://archive.is/ggMyf

https://archive.is/7n6GF

https://archive.is/nF7XD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWQdVB3IAvI

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 16:22:12 be0a5f No.288678

All that I see from Blackler is one email talking about anti-bullying initiatives at Disney and the NCMEC blocking kiddie porn images. For cases like this we ought to make them a package of information showing that there are crazy people trying to take over their movement. We want them on our side, not against us.

We should take a deeper look at APC's influence on that list.

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 18:35:57 55b263 No.288717

File: 1445020557897.gif (1.14 MB, 480x561, 160:187, c99.gif)

>>288678

>blocking kiddie porn images

People's feelings about CP aside, as EVERYONE wants to protect children; "kiddie porn" is a wedge issue which is used to overturn both constitutionally-protected freedoms and common-sense; as there is always, always, always, "mission creep" from "protecting" kids, to "protecting" drawings of imaginary characters, to "protecting" grown women that kinda look like kids, ect… like banning loli and the NSW Australia's attempt to ban small-breasted porn. Fucking again and again.

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 22:10:25 fd2cc6 No.288768

>>288678

No, she gives the child abuse stuff as an example of a way they could implement a model for reporting and take-downs.

And she admits to specifically editing the draft of the document, which is co-signing the APC's bullshit.

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 22:25:21 008aec No.288770

>>288717

Want to pass a draconian law?

First step, "protects women"

Second step "prevents terrorism"

Third step "prevents child abuse oh won't someone think of the little children!"

Every fucking time man.

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 22:58:32 dcfcc2 No.288774

>Citations:

Please. Post short descriptions of each link not just a bunch of links.

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 23:02:07 be0a5f No.288775

>>288768

On re-reading it, you're right.

Leader 10/16/15 (Fri) 23:04:05 5de761 No.288776

>>288774

The citations are all explained in the video, dumb fuck. They are literally listed on the screen for you.

Leader 10/17/15 (Sat) 01:00:40 6f6081 No.288807

File: 1445043640905.gif (471.64 KB, 400x221, 400:221, nugxql1FFA1s8it7p_500.gif)

>>288648

>s4t

Leader 10/17/15 (Sat) 08:24:26 0d1bfe No.289068

File: 1445070266421.png (205.85 KB, 946x2542, 473:1271, APC-Will-Play-The-Victim.png)

>>288648

Your assistance is needed to stay ahead of the UN's narrative

>>288805

Leader 10/17/15 (Sat) 09:16:03 2cd8b5 No.289075

>>288648

>That was a rhetorical question

was it?