>>293937
It's not upset. It's shit talking because that post's point was lacking. Defend your point or let it drop. I've probably been in the military too long, because that's how we call each other on our bullshit.
I know I don't exactly know the culture here, but I'm not fluff n puff soft either. And I know that channers pride themselves at being able to be called names and being able to be called out on dumb shit. That's why people calling me out on being bad at being here isn't an issue. I'm bad at being here, so I take it, because them's the rules.
But here's the thing about the The Escapist, or any of our allies. We should ALWAYS be ready to be critical of them. We don't need to attack them, but we do need to keep an eye on them. When IA spilled his shit all over the place, he was right to be mocked. Him getting so butthurt he left was his own decision. But this is also why Ralph can our version of Gawker and no one calls him out on it.
How do you think SJWs got to be what they are? But not uncritically examining their allies. I like The Escapist, and I like Liz, I subscribe to a lot of her stuff. So when some people are talking about them being corrupt about something, it concerns me. I don't want it to be true, but I'm gonna look into it. We don't seem to have a lot of active diggers anymore, so I took some initiative, even if it isn't what I'm good at. Them's the rules.