>>297883
Virtue signalling my ass! It's perfectly fine and normal to hate The Daily Mail because the quality of their news is utter shit; put out by no talent hacks who have nothing but sneering contempt for BOTH their audience and the subjects they cover.
Shit son, I'm a burgerlander and knew that the Daily Fail has been trash longer than the millennials have been alive.
What you're actually trying to argue against is using the ad hominem "to attack the man" logical fallacy, but outside a scored debate, you have to consider BOTH the source and the argument being presented; while a stopped clock, or a literally who like Brianna Wu John Flynt, can be right twice a day; I'm not gonna believe anything that liar says without some kind of 3rd-party verification, because "reputation" is a thing.