[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate Headquarters

All Sea Lions on Deck!

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Help spread of word of Games Media collusion and crooked actions by reading and sharing the Project DeepFreeze Database!
Stay up to date, hour by hour! #GamerGate Current Happenings List
/gamergatehq/ Rules: RULES
The Admin log can be viewed here: LOGS
For those who want to go more in-depth on the political aspects of #GamerGate, go see our allies on /pol/ and help with the 8chan-wide digging and research board over at 8diamonds


File: 1448319275421.gif (143.05 KB, 600x600, 1:1, 1447530944738-2.gif)

66bd24 No.300685

Found this on /n/ >>>/n/208543 thank's based /n/igger

Unfortunately, it links to the Daily Fail instead of an actual news site, but this was predicted: a feminist "kristallnacht" inflicted on white cis male scum.

>A student has been driven out of lectures and bars with shouts of ‘rapist’ after he dared to question the effectiveness of ‘consent workshops’. Second-year George Lawlor, 19, fears for his future at Warwick University after being ostracised and bullied for challenging a student union drive to hold rape awareness sessions.

>Writing in a blog, he argued that the overwhelming majority of people ‘don’t have to be taught to not be a rapist’ – and that men inclined to commit the crime would be unlikely to attend such a workshop. He added that he found his invitation to one of the sessions ‘incredibly hurtful’.

>But in the latest example of politically correct intolerance in universities, the student faced a fierce backlash from radical feminists. He was attacked on Twitter and Facebook by student activists branding him a ‘rapist’ and ‘misogynist’.

>The abuse was so bad that he stopped going to lectures. He told the Daily Mail: ‘I was expecting a reaction, but I was not prepared for just how horrible it was. I remember putting it online and told a few people, who were … saying there would be a backlash.’

>‘It’s all part of this no-platforming agenda, where they try and create “safe spaces” … but no-one ever thought to question whether I was in a “safe space”,’ he said. ‘People were calling for me to be expelled. You’re only allowed to talk about certain issues, it seems.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3329659/Campus-zealots-hound-student-lectures-bars-shouts-rapist-dared-question-effectiveness-rape-consent-workshops.html

https://archive.is/9Xe68

107eea No.300694

>>300685

Can't he sue them into oblivion?


ff03b2 No.300702

File: 1448325016265.jpg (12.13 KB, 173x300, 173:300, why.contain.it.jpg)

>>300694

>Can't he sue them into oblivion?

Since they are feminists it would literally be a lawsuit against the shadow government. The same people pushing feminism on mainstream and social media are trying to whitewash Hillary Clinton's entire life. Everything is backfiring on them now. Their remote army of feminazi drones have leaped into a new dimension of hate and intolerance.

They are all absolutely insane or incredibly naive about what really goes on in their little safe space. I give it about two or three years at most until we start regularly seeing feminists bombing and poisoning their opponents just like the 1st Wavers did a century ago. After Hillary suffers a humiliating loss to a strong and proud white man is when shit really hits the fan.

Feminists will finally see that they truly have zero power outside of their hugbox and will realize that the only thing left that they can destroy is the hugbox. They'll discredit every single great educational instituion in the USA, UK, and most of the EU as these vile, entitled witches point their cursing maws toward the hand that feeds them.


66bd24 No.300709

>>300694

Someone in the /n/ thread posted this:

>Section 89 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006:

>1.The head teacher of a relevant school must determine measures to be taken with a view to

>>(b) encouraging good behaviour and respect for others on the part of pupils and, in particular, preventing all forms of bullying among pupils,

>>(c) securing that the standard of behaviour of pupils is acceptable,

>(5)The measures which the head teacher determines under subsection (1) may, to such extent as is reasonable, include measures to be taken with a view to regulating the conduct of pupils at a time when they are not on the premises of the school and are not under the lawful control or charge of a member of the staff of the school.

It'll be interesting to see how different those school authorities act in the face of actual bulling and harassment inflicted on a cis white male.


119cde No.300711

I don't keep up, what "side" does the Mail lean on?


66bd24 No.300713

>>300711

The one that will make them the most money.

I would have posted a better link is there was an alternative.


119cde No.300727

>>300713

Well obviously, that's true for most news outlets nowadays.

Let me rephrase the question: did Daily Mail use to applaud SJW bullshit? Because if so, and they decided to turn against them, it would me we're at a turning point, even if it's only because people realize it's counter-productive to pander to Pussy Crushers.


34b93b No.300734

Dogpiling in real life. Remember when people said this idiocy would be contained to the internet?


abb74f No.300748

>>300734

Their entire premise is that being told they suck online is the same as real violence.

It wouldn't be proper projection if they weren't going to resort to real violence against people they think suck online.


785a49 No.300751

>>300748

>Their entire premise is that being told they suck online is the same as real violence.

We're seeing the opposite, where they think that real violence and dogpiling is the same as being told "you suck" online. So they may actually think they aren't doing anything bad.


119cde No.300758

>>300751

No, you see:

saying "you suck" online = real physical violence

therefore

real physical violence = saying "you suck" online

Also, keep MovieBlob's First Law of Warfare:

There are no bad tactics, only bad targets.

Ipso facto:

Real physical violence against someone THEY don't like is perfectly justifiable.


66bd24 No.300795

File: 1448346758183.webm (1.23 MB, 480x480, 1:1, 1447373965187.webm)

>>300727

Daily Fail are hit-piece mercenaries.

They're not about truth, good journalism, or even maintaining "the narrative". They just want to make money from cancer, immigrants, tits, or anything which will generate clicks, views, or sales; so I think you're right: they're reading how the wind is going to blow and lining up accordingly. I'm rubbing my hands like a jew thinking about shekels


abb74f No.300796

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>300795

I find this oddly soothing.


66bd24 No.300799

>>300796

I was just about to post that…

GET OUT OF MY HEAD CHARLES!


785a49 No.300802

>>300758

I'm saying we entered a logic loop and went backwards, where online saying "you suck" = violence, while actual real world violence is fine because it is equal to saying "you suck" which is nothing in real life.

Follow the logic? Of course not, it's fucking ass backwards.


de955e No.300854

File: 1448384413907-0.jpeg (56.38 KB, 349x324, 349:324, 1423622346140.jpeg)

File: 1448384413992-1.jpg (43.61 KB, 750x738, 125:123, rainbow-protection-umbrell….jpg)

>>300709

>It'll be interesting to see how different those school authorities act in the face of actual bulling and harassment inflicted on a cis white male.

These days anti-bullying is code word for anti-straight white (and often Christian) male. That's not even a joke. Think about it, whenever they show "anti-bullying" initiatives on TV the propaganda material usually has a rainbow flag on it and the reporter interviews some fag or dyke whining that not all their fellow students bow down to them and pander to their special snowflake status.


47565b No.300938

You are probably looking at lgbt ads specifically and not the old "tell an adult when kids are meanies!"

I also don't really watch TV nowadays so all I remember were the multicultural ones from the 90s.


366455 No.315864

>>300854

Dude. The picture to the right was made by stormfags.

And no, the bodycount stormfags - fags is still many - nil.

>>300938

>multicultural

Why are you using that code word when "niggers of different colors" is more elegant?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]