/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

I can second this. Don't force a change on an established term just to make it sound more fearmongering. That can only hurt us and it's as wise as aGGros going "goobergrape". SJW should be SJW

>>301281

SJWs cannot stand to be confronted in an argument. They feel threatened by other people's opinions and don't want a goobley-gerbler to interrupt their safe space. This is why they don't type "gamergate" on twitter or fb, because they are cowards.

We have no need to make up new words in order to hide our intentions. Our conversations take place out in the open for all to record and debate whenever they feel appropriate. We call the demon by their true name and watch them recoil in horror. Now that South Park has eliminated the credibility of these PC Pussy Crushers on national television they are acting like SJW is a thing that doesn't even exist.

I think out best option at this point is to channel their impotent rage and transmute it into profit for game companies that support creative freedom over social justice fascism.

The term SJW should continue being used, seeing how it caught on so much, is generally known even among normals and is used to negatively describe people.

While I'll agree that SJWs use fear (of blackmail, of slander, of harassment etc) to silence their opposition, literally putting the "terror" in "terrorism", the idea of changing the name is ridiculous. The reason why no-one should change it is twofold:

1. "SJW" became a "household name", it's something that even the casuals (if not even normies) know. Switching it around would cause nothing but confusion

2. The word "terrorist" is the equivalent of "Hitler". And just like someone can dismiss your whole argument with Goodwin's Law once you mention good ol' Adolf, so can using the word "terrorist" undermine ones arguments.

I'm not saying whoever suggested the change is a D&C shill (though it might be), it may just be a well-intentioned idiot. But fuck him either way.

>>301281

I very much agree. By defining a new term as SJT we give SJWs a chance to clean their name by defining a SJT as a false scotman. The SJW term should be as wide and inclusive of a set of destructive practices as possible, just as we can use "religious" to define the worst examples of stone worshippers.

It's simple, social justice warriors are keyboard warriors not afraid of terrorizing people to defend their social justice beliefs. Warriors can terrorize people, and considering the sort of things they've done to people like Mark Kern or Brad Wardell, they seem to fit an internet terrorist profile pretty well.

>>301281

First I've heard of the term. Probably some idiot's response to us being called terrorists for over a year. Might be an attempt to the muddy the waters by SJWs but I doubt it, nothing is ever too extreme as to be ridiculous in their minds.

Anyone comparing any of this to Paris or 9/11 is dumb. The term SJT is dumb. Even talking about it is dumb.

if it is to call them anything else SJW

i will go with "the problematic inquisition"

I use whatever term I feel like.

Usually SJW's, but Social Justice Zealot or SJ Fanatic also works.

The same reason why you said it's stupid to say SJT is the reason for which it's stupid to worry.

SJW is mainstream

Who cares about hipsters saying SJT they are a tiny insignificant minority.

And if instead of SJT they say Social Justice Terrorist normies will still get what it means.

This. Do NOT call them anything but SJWs. They are trying to reclaim that term by pushing SJT.

SJWS DON'T LET GAMERGATE DEFINE OURSELVES, DON'T LET SJWS CLAIM SJW AS A GOOD THING AND SJT AS A BAD THING. THEY ARE SJWS, PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

>>301281

I was on the thread where that was suggested; I thought it was stupid then and I think it's stupid now. I didn't say anything because I thought it was just people goofing around because the post that suggested it had satan trips or something. I saw one people use it on a thread but they were shot down hard.

>>301281

Well actually sjw is good for the irony but sjt is exactly what they are.

"Do what we say or else" and rule through fear.

>>301281

>>301281

OP is correct.

Things have momentum, and if you stop midway you fuck up the race for memes.

>change the hashtag, we need a new hashtag, etc…

Play Asia is a perfect example of SJW being the SJW's kryptonite.

They're virtually demons, and speaking their true name pisses them off to no end.

>>301281

OP is right, SJT is fucking stupid. It was quite hard to get SJW into normie vocabulary. SJT, will be even harder.

Don't worry, OP, it won't catch on. It sounds bitter and contentious, whereas Social Justice Warrior has caught on because it's funny. "SJW" makes fun of how seriously they take themselves, while SJT takes them too seriously.

>>303861

Normies and most SJWs don't realize that "social justice warriors" is what they called themselves for years because they are that stupid and that arrogant.

I even saw one moron on twitter claim that Gamergate invented the term in 2014. lel.

Ahem…

There are some videos being passed around calling SJW idiots. But saying that SJW shouldn't be the proper term because "warrior" implies something positive. So "terrorist" should replace it.

Only found 2 so far and I am hoping this doesn't pick up.

>>303936

Not necessary. SJWs already have a (very, very well-earned) bad reputation.

>>303936

They're fucking idiots. It's like keyboard warriors, the use of "warrior" is mocking. Mocking is the greatest weapon against because they fucking hate it.

>>301281

I've only ever used SJ myself, as social justice itself is the problem.

Social Justice is just the atheist version of this chunky bundle of fun.

But if a normie mentions SJW first, sure, go with that.

>>301353 Also acceptable. SJ for the people, SocJus for the philosophy. Just don't forget to include the flags, they barely play that movie anymore, the visual stimulus is required.

You know how feminists are all "I AIN PUT ON THIS PLANET TO EDUCATE YOU, PRIVILEGED SHITLORD"

yeeeh, need to not do that if we're to be rid of SocJus in its entirety.

If someone is receptive, give'em the rundown on what SJ really is

and if they're bluepill, link Meteoryan's twitlongers. SJs are part of the reason Prop 8 passed due to progressive-stacking their own side.

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1scvj6f https://archive.is/lHyv3

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1scgqdf https://archive.is/1B1HC

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sjmq5v https://archive.is/QhERL

This fag's one of the former organisers of the Prop 8 Cali protests. Got a front row seat to how SJ functions.

The one major difference between SJ and christfag is SJs fall to infighting shortly after becoming organised, while Christfags bond together until they form multi-church coalitions for teh jesus. SJs can only hold it together a few months before splintering.