On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:34 PM, benjamin barber <starworks5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm married to an educator, and I find the explanations you provided wholly insufficient. The grant ‘Deconstructing Gender Play in the Kindergarten Classroom', seems to indicate targeting of suspect class 'gender' using disparate treatment as follows:
>
> Quoting:
>
> "“I proposed allowing girls to have an unencumbered opportunity to become more comfortable working with Legos in an attempt to support girls with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math). "
>
>
> The Civil Rights Act as interpreted by the supreme court says provides only narrowly tailored exceptions to the actual causes of disparate impact insofar as it doesn't violate disparate treatment under the 14th amendment equal protection clause. Moreover gender expression and gender identity are protected statuses within the state of Washington, thus trying to 'deconstruct' them is a violation of the student civil rights.
>
> http://www.k12.wa.us/secondaryeducation/presentations/pubdocs/2015/GenderIdentity.pdf
>
> Being that you seem to disregard the legitimate complaints that many have, I would like to request to have the grant records in question produced, furthermore I would like to see the disciplinary actions records produced. Even if these grants and records were produced on a private mail box to the private Bainbridge foundation, they are still considered public records
>
> Per RCW 42.56.070(3)(f) Correspondence, and materials referred to therein, by and with the agency relating to any regulatory, supervisory, or enforcement responsibilities of the agency, whereby the agency determines, or opines upon, or is asked to determine or opine upon, the rights of the state, the public, a subdivision of state government, or of any private party.
>
> Per RCW 42.56.520 Responses to request for public records shall be made promptly by agencies. Finding – 2010 c 69: “The internet provides for instant access to public records at a significantly reduced cost to the agency and the public. Agencies are encouraged to make commonly requested records available on agency web sites. When an agency has made records available on its web site, members of the public with computer access should be encouraged to preserve taxpayer resources by accessing those records online.” [2010 c 69 § 1.]
>
> Pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act (RCW 42.56), OSPI has redacted exempt information in these documents. The most common redactions include the following: state employee personal information including: home address, phone numbers, ssn; student personal information including: home address, phone numbers, ssn, parent names.
>
> Failing to do so would serve as a official misconduct, a gross misdemeanor.
>
> Per RCW 9A.80.010
>
> (1) A public servant is guilty of official misconduct if, with intent to obtain a benefit or to deprive another person of a lawful right or privilege:
> (a) He or she intentionally commits an unauthorized act under color of law; or
> (b) He or she intentionally refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him or her by law.
> (2) Official misconduct is a gross misdemeanor.
>
> http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.80.010
> http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=42.56.070
> http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=42.56.210
> http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=42.56.520
> http://www.k12.wa.us/ProfPractices/investigations/DisciplinaryAction.aspx
>