/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

This is a direct copy and paste

"*On 11/12/2015, Acid claimed he had a bomb to drop on GGR ****

On 12/2/2015, Acid claims that one week prior (11/25/2015), the information was forwarded to the FBI's cybercrimes division.

But on 11/28/2015, he claimed that the reason he waited "weeks" to give anyone this information was to give it a chance to be "forwarded" to the cybercrimes division. This means that, at the earliest, Acid could have posted this information on 11/25, but let's keep going.

Here's the real problem with his story.

In his email to Hotwheels on 11/27/2015, he claims the info was delivered on Monday the previous week, which would put it on either 11/16/2015, or 11/23/2015 depending on what he considers Monday.

Let's consider the longest-case scenario, because "time" is what he needs for his story to be true: weeks' worth of it.

So let's make a timeline now:

11/12/2015: Acid predicts the future, claiming he has a bomb to drop on GGR despite not actually having delivered the USB drive yet.

11/16/2015: Acid delivers the USB drive

11/25/2015: (9 days later) Acid somehow uses his magical speshal weapon salesman powers to find out that his information was forwarded to the cybercrimes division.

11/27/2015: Acid informs Hotwheels that the information is “going” (as in not there yet) to the FBI cyber crimes’ division.

11/28/2015: Acid drops his "bomb," claiming it took weeks for the information to be forwarded (9 days) and investigated (9 days)

12/2/2015: Acid claims that a week earlier (11/25/2015) the information first arrives at the cybercrimes, and two weeks earlier (11/18/2015) he delivered it (though it was longer ago than that)"

And

"11/16/2015 IS WHEN HE CLAIMS TO HAVE DELIVERED THE USB DRIVE

But he said the reason we waited "weeks" (referring to his post on 11/12/2015) is that he needed time to for the information to be forwarded to cyber crime, which is a problem BECAUSE HE DIDN'T FUCKING DELIVER IT UNTIL 11/16/2015 ACCORDING TO HIS OWN FUCKING STORY"

Acid? I'm sure there's an explanation for this.

oooo, more subtle this time!

xcept no one cared whether it was true or not,

If true awsome cuz fuck the cancer crew trying to get Acid swated, an d their general dickedness for months.

If not this was awsome trolling delivering karmic butthurt payback for said month of shitposting and D&C shillery.

>>306802 Subtle? I'm not here to troll. I like Acid and this board.

>>306802

>xcept no one cared whether it was true or not,

….

Excuse me anon but you don't speak for me. Maybe you don't care but as much as I detest revolt I at least care about the truth, i mean,it's the ethical thing to do. If it's not true we have a responsibility to accept that. But this doesn't prove anything it just makes Acid's story look bad.

cuz this drama serve no purpose for GG, and only people wanting DnC care. It's irrelevant to GG, at best it was amusing to see revolt be the ones being laughed at, it also has no actual impact whatsoever on ggrevolt as a board, since normal user aint got squat to worry about.

>>306805

fine, i'll rephrase, the majority of people in the 8 threads did not care, so while I dont speak for you personally, saying we didnt care when based on the majority is good enough, stop nitpicking

>>306806 You're welcome to feel that way. I'm not an authoritarian. I can't control what's important to you or not. But this board is an important part of gamergate, and this has become an important part of this board. I care about it. I'm giving Acid the benefit of the doubt, but I have been made discomforted by these claims, because they do check out.

>>306808

>The majority of people in the 8 threads did not care

>8 threads

Surely if there were 8 threads the majority of us cared.

>>306810

the majority of the threads were filled with a handful of people sperging and bitching, and exposed their affiliations, and the majority doing less post each, more numerous, all laughing at the spaghetti hitting the fan, and encouraging the spergers to shitpost more.

>>306810

the majority of the threads were filled with a handful of people sperging and bitching, and exposed their affiliations, and the majority doing less post each, more numerous, all laughing at the spaghetti hitting the fan, and encouraging the spergers to shitpost more.

>>306810

better yet, the threads are still there, so go look for yourself, count the number of ID laughing at this all, and the select few bitching. and come back at me with a detailed graph

Op the mods here and the community are all unethical people. They don't care if it's false. They only cared when they thought it was true. All your thread will do is convince them to pretend they were trolling all this time.

>>306815

trolling on an imageboard is unethical? that is assuming its all false that is.

newsflash we aint god damn reporters

>>306815

the word you are searching for is morality, as in the mods here and the community are all without morals and/or hypocrites. Not agreeing with this statement, just saying this one would have a better leg to stand on than "unethical"

>>306814

Dude don't fucking lie. After the Ralph stream people realized they looked like retards so in the later threads as opposed to the beginning threads they transitioned into "I was only pretending to be retarded" mode.

Ask yourself: if they really did believe Acid vs. if they didn't, would they react any differently?

No. Either way they'd claim trolling.

>>306820

it was there, in the very 1st threads, pointing out how even if it was all a gigantic false flag troll thingy, that it was still hilarious.

it was also called in the 1st threads how they was no proof either way and that this was at best entertainment and nothing was to come out or it, or should ocme out of it unless actual evidence surfaced.

by calling me a liar you are showing your colors btw, ya suck at playing devils advocate. the goal is to level the other with his own arguments. by going NO U you are essentially attempting to shut down discussion.

better luck next time

And if he lie, why is GGR shitting bricks as if there was something to hide? Why would people like Kevin flip out?

>>306802

"trying to get swated" what does that mean, does that mean they called in an active shooter scenario, or reported to the cops that he was distributing bomb making instructions.

"swatted" means that you report a violent crime in progress.

>>306826

>Why would people like Kevin flip out?

Because this isn't his first rodeo:

http://web.archive.org/web/20140520190143/http://www.stopthegrbullies.com/2014/05/16/kevin-weinberg-aka-parogar

http://web.archive.org/web/20140521202502/http://www.stopthegrbullies.com/2014/05/21/parogar-threatens-avery-duncans-victim/

>>306826 I don't believe anyone shit bricks. You just chose to see it that way.

>>306831

Those links don't mean anything. Are you slow or do you have a learning disability?

>>306831 You are Jynx.

>>306832

>>306835

Oh so that is you Kevin. Don't drop the soap. :^)

>>306832

someone has not been paying attention to the numerous threads across the boards created by butthurt people demanding ACTION be taken against Acid.

>>306836 Not Kevin no

>>306832

Bullshit. The butthurt from this was amazing

>>306837 Not Kevin no (wrong post tagged above)

>>306842

All eight threads are archived. Only about one or two posters out of all of GGHQ's regulars were smart enough to see through this. The rest all listened and believed. That's a fact.

>>306843

>>306844

How high is your post count going to get this thread? Or are you just going to go back to attempting to spam the board?

>>306845

Good question and easily answered.

Acid claimed he loaded up *EVERYTHING* onto a USB flash drive: all of it

>>306828

So are you implying copes WERE in fact called on Acid? cuz if your goal is to attack his credibility, and pretend he lied all along, this is not helping.

Or are you saying that Acid did the right thing to forward to the FBI all relevant info on the people who called the police on him, when the FBI came asking?

because the problem is ya have two side of a story, and no side can prove anything.

so ya either dismiss it ALL, or ya don't and get to chose the most credible story, or make a collage, but then its still without evidence and beyond believing it, ya aint supposed to do jack shit with it beyond

COOL STORY BRO

and this is what is is, a cool story, with butthurt sperging as the seasoning

>>306847

yes but as you said, no proof, also where did ID: d7c9a6 go? I don't want to imply but… ya showed up as soon he left, and I have not seen overlaps.

>>306848

Someone somewhere probably did report him to the cops. That's not a crime. It's lame but it's not illegal and it's not Swatting

>>306849 I don't know or care tbh

>>306851

You need to get better at hiding your writing style Kevin.

>>306847

What if he has more info? Email exists.

>>306849

He's going to get it to 50 then switch IP so he won't look too autistic.

>>306848

Acid lied about being swatted, he lied about the people involved, and he put people who had nothing to do with it on a public list, pinning their names to this board for 8 threads' worth of content

>>306852

Not Kevin

>>306854

How do you know that? Over some dates?

>>306854

And if he lied, sue him then faggot

>>306851

ah, so fba938 is still you?

>>306850

so, if someone indeed reported him to the cops… and he then indeed gave info to the FBI when they came snooping, what is the big deal? that he posted about it and scared some persons? was it even his idea to post about it or was it requested to smoke them out? nobody knows, but it sure got hilarious to watch the reactions.

>>306859

>ah, so fba938 is still you?

It's Kevin proxy hopping. d7c9a6, fba938, and a7d6ec are all Kevin.

>>306855

hey, protip Kevin, some people who are not kevin would ignore post calling them kevin, yet systematically when someone call kevin they always reply they not kevin, instead of ignoring it.

ya need to ignore those poste here and then, looks suspicious otherwise

>>306853

It wouldn't matter. He claimed on the 12th of November that he had a big reveal. On the 28th of November he "revealed" it and said the reason it took so long was to allow data to be sent from the FBI to the cyber crime division.

The problem is that he sent that data on the 16th, not the 12th. Furthermore it took 9 days, not "weeks" as he claimed for the feds to allegedly "forward" that data to their cyber crime division

>>306861

>>306860

Yeah but I'm not Kevin so…

>>306862

what is he had an appointment on the 16th that he knew beforehand on the 12th? and could hold in his spagethi and announced that, and on the 16th it ammounted to just giving them the harddrive?

>>306863

ya did it again homie.

ya can't help but reply not kevin when someone call ya kevin, ya just can't

>>306865

couldn't*

>>306859

yeah fba is me. I'm on a 4G connection right now. I am on a bus home. ID may change

>>306863

Do you even play video games Kevin? What's your favorite game? Or are you too busy writing shitty books that don't sell to play vidya?

>>306847

On Thanksgiving day, I ate everything on the table for Thanksgiving dinner. This does not mean I did not eat breakfast.

Now draw the line in the puzzle. What solution did you come up with?

>>306865

USB thumb drive, not hard drive. Try to keep up.

And no.

His big reveal was announced 4 days before he had anything to reveal. And his reason for having to wait so long, in his own words, was to allow the feds to forward the data he'd given them to the cyber division, something he couldn't have known would occur until the 16th

>>306870

>>306871

You two seem like you really want to derail this. It's pretty obvious why.

>>306872

Hey I'm interested in your answer to this

>>306856

>>306857

>>306869

ah, so your ID does change, but by thread flow it seems to me like you are also OP.

>>306873

You should really be spending your time working shit out with a lawyer right now m8.

>>306875

Easy question.

Acid lied about being swatted because reporting someone to the FBI isn't Swatting

>>306876

And given Acid's words, you believed his claims were true. So I'm not entirely sure your ability to interpret and assess information is worthy of being taken seriously.

>>306878

so he used the wrong term, does that render illegitimate his action to give the info he had to the FBI when they came asking?

cuz I fail to see how it change the situation, are you downplaying that cuz it was not swating it was not okay to give info to FBI when they came asking?

>>306880

nice deflect.

>>306881

It's a pretty serious mistake.

For one, if Acid wasn't swatted, there was no crime, there was no reveal, and there was no basis to his actions

Secondly, simply using the wrong word is not so simple when that term is "Swatting."

Such an "error" is equivalent to confusing "wound" with "murder".

>>306880

also last I checked I explicitly said that even if its just a giganting trolling, I was okay with it, be it solely on the Karmarrific aspect of it all.

I also was among those telling so in the previous threads, I acknowledged Acid might have lied in those, ya failed to acknowledge he might be telling the truth, to some degree at least.

>>306881

Also, the FBI doesn't come around to ask questions like that. He lied about that part as well. He claims the ATF came to him and told him of the "Swatting attempt."

The ATF does not deal with swatting in any capacity whatsoever. Furthermore, the ATF does not inform people when they are reported for something

>>306883

filling false report is also a crime. but then that might be what the FBI is looking for, trying to figure out if the one calling the cops was doing it under legitimate concern, or to waste police time, and icidently the FBI's cuz of security clearance. You are conflating what he did, and what he said on this board.

>>306884 Because I'm unconvinced he's told the truth about anything.

>>306886

There's no proof anyone called the cops. And of they had, Acid wouldn't know about it. The cops don't call people to inform them they've been falsely reported by 8chan – or anyone else.

That's simply not how law enforcement works.

>>306886

>You are conflating what he did, and what he said on this board.

Well of course I am, sir. My claim is that he lied. Which is precisely when someone's actions fail to meet their description of those actions.

>>306887

yeah well, go one listening and disbelieving everything he says, just like everyone on GGr, I prefer to just listen & ignore, in the sense that as long nothing concrete surface about all of this, we all better just laught at it, you included.

Yet here you are, creating a thread for the sole purpose of attacking the Board Owner, and I can`t help but ask myself why?

Because even if you were 100% correct, last I checked this was a GG board, and the focus is on game journo, ethics, SJW authoritarianism in gaming, etc etc. not board owned faggyness. The reason I stay here is also because of tighter moderation allowing to stay on target, that is when we not busy talking with Sliders and D&Cers who care more about the political drama of GG than what need to be done.

so until he actually fucks with board rules, and make the BOARD go in a direction I cannot follow, I care not if he made all this up.

I MIGHT have cared it he did that to anyone else who did not deserve that kind of spooks! (and you said yourself he must have lied, if so it mean he CANNOT then have done anything wrong to someone beside scaring ya on the internet). But the butt of this farce is Cancer Crew, not even GGr as he explicitely stated they were not the target. So either NO ONE was the target, or CANCER CREW was. and after the months of derail and shitposting and inboard drama induced by them, this is in my eye fair retribution.

>>306891

This is the stupidest post that anyone in the history of the internet has ever made.

Goodnight

/thread

>>306893

out of argument? so outright dismiss it?

alight, Goodnight

/thread

(btw, if I can make a suggestion, the best course of action, would be to stop inboard drama period. that would include a new rule on GGr explicitly stating on in-board drama, not only ya might recruit people to ggr this way, but it would make ya appear more legitimate)

>>306895

no in-board Drama*

LOL, Kevin and the rest of ggr think they're defense lawyers or judges and that Acid needs to provide evidence to THEM.

>>306902

>My only real remaining concern … is whether every name shown from Acid's dossiers was really involved in this incident.

Why would people think that? Every single ggr sperg has been triggered by the names in that folder, yet it doesn't follow that every one of those faggots was reported to the feds or considered as being involved even if Acid handed that info over.

Critical thinking skills were never the strong suit of these D&C e-celebrity coveting clowns.

QuQu sweating a little isn't a big deal since he's a D&C douchebag as seen during the incident with GameDiviner (since he wrote that shit).

>>306891

>yeah well, go one listening and disbelieving everything he says, just like everyone on GGr, I prefer to just listen & ignore, in the sense that as long nothing concrete surface about all of this, we all better just laught at it, you included.

I don't see why OP shouldn't make a thread about acid being full of shit given that acid made 8 threads about himself and his fbi snitching adventures expecting everybody to swallow them. And I don't see why people shouldn't doubt or not trust acid even further given that he has lied and has been pretty clumsy at doing so.

>Because even if you were 100% correct, last I checked this was a GG board, and the focus is on game journo, ethics, SJW authoritarianism in gaming, etc etc. not board owned faggyness. The reason I stay here is also because of tighter moderation allowing to stay on target, that is when we not busy talking with Sliders and D&Cers who care more about the political drama of GG than what need to be done.

Didn't acidnigger make threads and threads about his inboard drama happening shit to begin with and even made them sticky 8 fucking times? oh but I guess its ok when acid does indulge into inboard drama because he's the board owner, right?

If you claim this board is about ethics in games journalism, his sticky threads about he snitching to FBI for BEING REPORTED TO THE FBI, NOT FOR BEING SWATTED shouldn't have existed in the first place. did you shit on acid for making those threads tho? the hypocresy dude.

>>306921

That man is going to die alone.

>>306927

Why the FBI take so many time to raid GGR? This is get boring.

>>306902

Well said, sir.

The only thing I'd add is that Acid's story can also accomodate a period between Acid speaking to the agent, and the agent then relaying that information to the cybercrimes division, to see if cybercrimes is interested in doing anything or simply letting the matter drop. If cybercrimes decides they're interested in seeing if an investigation is worthwhile, they contact the agent, the agent contacts Acid, Acid drops the drive off on the sixteenth, and we all enjoy some sweet street theater.

These things move at the speed of bureaucracy and there are several working parts in play that are dependent on others to facilitate communications.

All that said, I appreciate your skepticism, and would similarly point out that all of the above is pure conjecture based on statements that have yet to be proven either way.

>>306967

>The reason I waited on the bombdrop was to give them time to look over the info and get started. When Zan yanked down the dox stream video and they tried to cover shit up while sperging out, the FBI was looking on.

This was my first guess, seeing the thread, I wanted to post that in the first thread. But hell I enjoyed the shitshow way more. Just awesome sperg.

Well played Acid, well played.

>bumplocked thread

Cole, you fucking coward.

>>306967

> "Let me put it this way: Do you think you just walk into an FBI building and talk to specific people without an appointment?"

Yes, you sissy faggot retard. You don't make an appointment. You walk in and fill out a form.

That's literally how it's done. It's a law enforcement agency not a fucking doctor's visit you sissy cuckold little bitch.

>>306927

And even if your backwoods shit infested FBI office doesn't allow "walk-ins" it still doesn't explain how you knew 4 days in advance of what you did what would happen and how. Face it. You lied and you're still lying. And you lack the testicular fortitude to own up to your bullshit.

Upload that stream faggot. Or your board is going to be even more fucked than your waifu.

From Cole: They didn't give me a timetable, but since it has to go up through the Attorney General he made it sound like it was going to take a while.

>they

>he

>>306992

Well, there is a certain jew who doesn't bumplock shit. Just saying.

>>306967

I love how you don't address how you fucked up the dates, is it because it fucks up your fucking charade?

Also, taking down a video doesn't make it unrefutable proof that its contents are pertinent to what you accuse them for. but seems like jumping into conclussions is what you live for.

If you're the great digger you claim to be, you should have stream somewhere in your USB drive right? why don't you mirror it so we can all see how much he and his "meme death squads" doxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxed you.

For someone going around trying to demostrate those people are bad guise trying to take you kill you, you show very few evidence of your claims (my bad, 0 fucking evidence). What we see instead? how your words in your mails and posts don't match at all and how despite even after 2 weeks you were saying "hurr FBI van incoming" nothing has happened. anyone with a fucking brain would see you're more full of shit than a fertilizer bag.

>>307568

I love how you just posted in a weeks old bumplock thread just so you could claim victory points in a thread on /b/.

I really don't know how you could possibly be a bigger faggot.

>>309748

>checks date

you're replying to a weeks old comment.