/gamergatehq/ - We still have our A.T. Field!

Terrible quiz. It has a tendency to lean left and libertarian because of the questions about gay shit, because if you don't give a damn who fucks who, you get massive leftist points

>>307227

What's a "leftist"?

Here you go: http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/841842-gamergate

This thread could probably be bumplocked now.

i wonder what anti-gg political leanings look like

>>307236

>What's a "leftist"? Someone that supports social equality over personal liberty. It was coined in reference to the seating arrangement in the Estates General during the french revolution. It includes but is not limited to many democratic parties, Socialists, Communists and ANCOM.

>>307222

It doesn't take a census to work out GG is libertarian leaning nor should it be startling we're mostly leftists.

>>307254

>i wonder what anti-gg political leanings look like

Depends if you think they'll answer honestly or not. I recon most of them would be in the Authoritarian Left area with a few Left-Lib if they were releasing the results publicly, but I'm convinced most of them are only using SJ to shield them the Liberal criticism of their Authoritarian Right behavior.

>>307259

>>307259

Yeah you lost me

Someone who isn't behind the gg blockbot could tweet the link at them

>>307222

We already did this last year.

And that test is allegedly biased to the left, which means most of Gamergate is smack dab in the middle, with a slight bias to left.

>>307331

Thing is, I sense that the group/type of people "in" gamergate has changed since last year.

>>307335

Then for population size using GGHQ won't cut it.

GGR is a Divide and Conquer aGGro board, and r/KIA leans more left than GGHQ.

>>307338

>r/KIA leans more left than GGHQ.

Not sure that's the case any more. They relaxed the rules. It's anything goes now and there's still a former triangle mod on the team. Posts that appeal to right wing people seem to get upvoted (although it could just be those ggr irc vote brigades we've heard about).

>>307222

Why not ask what Hogwarts house GG is in?

Have fun in 4th period social studies

That thing isn't accurate. The questions it asks are outdated for the current political climate.

Yeah, I'm not buying it. I'm way too far left.

Economic Left/Right: -5.25

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

>>307468

some cool idea would be to make a external poll and people here vote on it.

this poll is a duplicated one, and we get the most voted answer on this duplicated poll and vote on site poll

>(1)

Always, especially considering how OP gave no info whatsoever on why he want us to redo it for the eleventh time.

>Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified.

this question is bullshit as laws can be bullshit, on my country we had a law that you have to have some card to be able to play live as a musician and to get this card you need to show you play well, following this law as some example is a bullshit thing to do.

So is this international law bullshit or not in the first place?

>"from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is a fundamentally good idea.

>"to each according to his need"

who decide what I need? If I have one trillion, but some scifi spaceship is literally possible to be built within 10 years if you have 11 trillions and I want that spaceship? Do I have more than I need?

>Those with the ability to pay should have the right to higher standards of medical care .

How the hell this works. Making private doctors and drugstores illegal?

Who the hell would want that?

"Sorry but you (well everyone) must have the same medical care quality than the one a homeless guy can get"

>A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.

How the hell you will have a government without discussing what you will do, even one party stat has that.

Even if somehow tried to just follow the christian bible, people would discuss on what the bibble really means

>Although the electronic age makes official surveillance easier, only wrongdoers need to be worried.

>only wrongdoers

Only wrongdoers according to who? Wrong and right is subjective. On the far past we had a guy that was killed because he said earth was not flat, WTF

>Abstract art that doesn't represent anything shouldn't be considered art at all.

>Abstract art that

So its art or not, first you say it is and then ask us to say if it is or not

>Astrology accurately explains many things.

What this have to do with political compass

Full of loaded questions.

> If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.

Who'd put corporations before "humanity" in the first place? You don't need to be leftist or libertarian to decide on what's considered "leftist" there.

> I'd always support my country, whether it was right or wrong.

Who says right-wing people necessarily defends their country when it's wrong? Who defines this "right" or "wrong" stuff to begin with?

>>307222

I'm center-right.

Somewhat liberal on social issues, and rather conservative when it comes to the economy and foreign policy.

And that poll is chock full of loaded questions that skew results to the left.

>>309483

Honestly, I would. If the economy collapses humanity is fucked anyways

>>309975

>Oh, hello cancer that infested GG.

1. I've been in GG since august 2014 and done more IRL for GG than you can imagine

2. nice to see you're intolerant of opinions that don't conform with your beliefs.

Mildly left, very libertarian.

>>307468

I'd like to see a more recent once, since half the people in GG got bored and left since this was made.

>>310056

Bit far on the scale, aren't you m80?

If you score in the red or the blue please do the world a favour and jump off a fucking cliff. I don't care if you are a gamergate supporter, I want you dead. I want you deader than the dodo. I scored in the green and while I don't like my purple neighbours, at least I can discuss things with them without risking being thrown in some Gulag (red) or Privatised Prison (blue).

>>310261

Spotted the D&C shill

Couldn't we just try a different test this time? This one is tedious as fuck and not really that worth it because the questions a little biased.

Is there any particular reason why this goddamned quiz doesn't allow us to select a "neutral" choice for any of these questions? Not every one of us has an opinion on every issue, you know.

>>310364

And by "speech impediment" you mean "cocaine"?

>>310420

He seems to have extreme nasal congestion or something that amounts to mild Tourette syndrome.

>>310411

The poll is clearly setup to make you think you're a lefty.

>gives you huge lefty points for agreeing with libertarian things like abortion, gay, etc

>gives you RIGHT wing points for censoring things while the left is doing all of it

>passes off social authoritarianism as right wing despite PC being a left thing

>>312772

I sort of think this is a shill thread. This test is designed to make people appear more liberal. And that makes /pol/ and us not get along as well as we should. It's meant for all the burn outs in /pol/ to look at this and go

>lol GG is all a bunch of liberal SJWs

when in fact the test itself is loaded to make people appear more liberal.

>>312772

That isn't a loaded question. It's asking "If there is a situation where it must, should it prefer A or B"

>>312817

>lol GG is all a bunch of liberal SJWs

…what

>>307255

>social equality over personal liberty

We can't have both?

>>312820

>That isn't a loaded question. It's asking "If there is a situation where it must, should it prefer A or B"

> a situation where it must

That sounds like a loaded question to me. There is no "situation where it must", it's a false premise based on current economic realities and how capitalism works.

It's not a liberal/conservative question, it's a democracy/oligarchy question.

>>312851

A less biased method would be to present the rhetoric from both sides.

Like do you prefer [left wing rhetoric] or [right wing rhetoric].

By only including the left wing argument they are drawing the more suggestible people towards that conclusion. Even if its not one they would arrive at on their own.