Why is Anita Sarkeesian silent about the rape, murder of women?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1451118834042.jpg (37.18 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, tmp_30265-maxresdefault-21….jpg)

Why is Anita Sarkeesian silent about the rape, murder of women? Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 08:33:54 d63025 No.310586

HUACfag here. I have a link I need to show you.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1238085/Chilling-screams-Yazidi-women-dragged-away-ISIS.html

In this link is a shocking video, reportedly smuggled from an ISIS stronghold, that shows jihadists dragging away young girls from their parents.

I ask all of you on /pol/, /ggrevolt/, and /gamergatehq/ a pertinent question.

If Anita Sarkeesian represents women’s rights, why is she silent while girls are being raped in the Middle East by Muslims?”

Yazidi women, Christian women, ripped out of their mother’s arms.

Go and look at the videotape. I have it up from the Daily Mail which was posted originally on MichaelSavage.com.

It is one of the most heartrending tapes I have ever seen in my life.

Yazidi girls screaming as they are being torn away from their mothers and fathers in a school yard by these untermenschen, these subhumans.

These subhumans who make Hitler’s minions look like Boy Scouts, and we’re doing nothing about it.

Virtually nothing about it.

Zoe Quiin and Chanty Binx are saying nothing about these rapes.

Sarkeesian, the liar, who represents women like my dog represents women.

How could she say she represents women when she is saying nothing about ongoing rape and kidnapping, Lindsey Ellis?

Lindsey, hey big mouth, hey Nostalgia Chick, who loves all things liberal.

That's all.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 11:53:36 a7c231 No.310598

File: 1451130816555.jpg (564.62 KB, 900x900, 1:1, anitasarkeesian_silent.jpg)

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 12:08:30 dc9e1b No.310599

>It doesn't affect her

>There's not enough shekels or attention to be gained in caring about the Middle East

Next question

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 12:29:04 7d5a99 No.310601

>>310586

>>310598

Well you know, rape in the Middle East is "cultural" for them SJWs so of course we can't touch it.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 12:38:38 05142d No.310602

How dare you criticise Islam you rasist biggot, even is they kidnap, rape, torture, enslave, cut of their clitoris, and force them to live in a musky dungeon to forever give birth to new jihadist who will be torn from their arms at birth, that their culture and you have no right to discriinate against them when their diversity comes to culturally enrrich our family.

Tjat pretty much sums up the feminist arguments regarding islam

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 12:45:45 05142d No.310603

That pretty much sums up the feminist responses to midle east inquirys

Phantasm!agoricWOck 12/26/15 (Sat) 17:42:31 5738b2 No.310618

Not to mention that they're always crying about a white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, when these Yazidi women are being enslaved, with literal enslavement contracts and emancipation contracts.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 19:02:34 af4808 No.310626

>>310586

Remember when Mercedes tried to get help for the woman in Las Vegas who was raped in front of her children, and not a single SJW spoke up?

These people are not for women's right. They are for THEIR OWN rights. They want THEIR rules enforced. This is why they spoke with straight faces at the UN to countries that rape and beat women about how being called a liar online is the ultimate form of harassment.

As for Muslims, this is where Intersectional progressivism fails. Intersectional means that these people all support each other. The problem is, should they speak against Muslim treatment of women, they would be speaking against Muslims, which are a protected class under their own rules. This is why no one has said anything about the transblack woman or that guy who is a 6 year old girl now. They will not speak out about bullshit and actually atrocities because one of their own will be put in the crossfire.

And finally, the BIGGEST REASON is: It is too difficult. It's easier to cry wolf and pretend to have tumblr PTSD than it is to actually sacrifice time and money to making the world a better place. Anita and Chelsea had the UN, a WORLD STAGE, to say ANYTHING THEY WANTED TO and they squandered it. She could have said something that would have rocked every nation, but they did not, instead choosing to speak about petty bullshit.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 20:12:02 d63025 No.310634

>>310602

Then counter that bullshit claim with this.

WHAT RACE IS FUCKING ISLAM?!

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 20:15:40 d63025 No.310635

>>310626

Indeed. That's why it's all the more important to keep putting the pressure on not only Sarkeesian, but members of the international government as well, including the UN. And, in my opinion, one of the steps to do that, is to bring back HUAC

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 20:34:46 3b3669 No.310636

File: 1451162087635.png (Spoiler Image, 249.6 KB, 550x739, 550:739, 1451083266404-0.png)

>>310586

I am pretty sure she is a self appointed speaker for over a billion women worldwide if she actually represented women rights shes doing a pisspoor job of it.

She isn't actually interested in women's rights as she is interested in popularity to feed her ego and fill her Patreon or whatever she uses you can check her twitter account has she ever shown even a slight concern for women unlucky enough to be born in utter shitholes?or actual rape victims?how about women who were abused?this includes verbal & forced labor as well as prostitutio has she ever mobilized her twitter followers or used her connections to accomplish any of the goals i have mentioned?

Heres the thing she is more of an e-celeb narcissist with an ideological push to infect others with ,nothing more nothing less if you expect her to show concern for any thing that does not benefit her directly you are on a long road buddy.

As for the video,i watched it about a month ago it is certainly disturbing but the thing is no one really wants to go all in to clean up the mess that is the middle east and i don't blame them Murica tried and failed spectacularly,the UN is next to useless and the gulf states are too busy building skyscrapers and debauchery to give to shits about them.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 21:00:00 d5d6b3 No.310639

File: 1451163600950.jpg (71.3 KB, 515x333, 515:333, Money-stacks.jpg)

This is what she's really after.

Hence why she's leaving Feminist Frequency to Jonathan McIntosh so she can take the money and run.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 21:22:16 2ce101 No.310641

>>310586

>If Anita Sarkeesian represents women’s rights, why is she silent while girls are being raped in the Middle East by Muslims?”

Welcome to feminism. Psychotic to the core, unbelievably selfish and cruel, and painfully hypocritical.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 21:46:54 9ea087 No.310645

File: 1451166415152.jpg (Spoiler Image, 108.74 KB, 600x848, 75:106, CXCAbH0WcAAYstj.jpg)

Did anita ever do porno or noodz at any point in her life?

Or am i getting her mixed up with her besties?

At this point her and her besties might as well just form a humongous single blob due to how similar they are to each other.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 21:51:59 ff0b28 No.310648

>If Anita Sarkeesian represents women’s rights, why is she silent while girls are being raped in the Middle East by Muslims?”

That's something we've all been wondering for a long while.

Why are SJWs, the very first people to cry "sexism" about every little thing, no matter how unrelated, all turn a blind eye to actual systemic sexism in the world?

It's not just that they focus on first world problems, but they outright defend and excuse radical Islamist behavior while calling for the heads of white men who looked at a woman funny once.

Leader 12/26/15 (Sat) 23:01:00 dc9e1b No.310670

>>310635

I'm pretty sure the problem is that middle eastern people while marginalized (by their definitions) in some countries aren't considered a 'real' race or ethinicity; ergo they are not any kind of minority, so they've resorted to calling Muslims a minority.

Unfortunately if you're a Syrian Christian or an Iranian Zorastrian or Arabic atheist you kind of get to eat shit as a cis white shitlord.

Leader 12/27/15 (Sun) 04:19:43 54913e No.310688

>>310586

Modern feminism and SJW culture focuses on things that are within the average westerners frame of reference. That's why it's more profitable to rag on video games and petty shit like 'fart rape' than to actually try and change a legitimate wrong in the world. A spoiled feminist can relate to having to deal with someone farting in an elevator but can't grasp the concept of having to live in a culture where they would legitimately have to worry about getting raped whenever they set foot outside of their house.

Leader 12/27/15 (Sun) 05:27:17 64f902 No.310699

See, by asking that question, Leader, you are assuming that Sarkeesian is genuinely, selflessly concerned for the well being of all women, and their representation in all media. And continuing the assumption, she'll gladly donate a good chunk of her money to charities who bring justice to such women in fear of rape/murder/discrimination.

The answer is quite simple: She's not, she doesn't, and monies.

Especially monies.

Leader 12/27/15 (Sun) 08:55:18 842755 No.310710

>>310586

>If Anita Sarkeesian represents women’s rights, why is she silent while girls are being raped in the Middle East by Muslims?”

A few reasons:

1. Talking about it wouldn't net her any victimbux.

2. SJWs are forbidden by their dogma to say Muslims aren't perfect and right in everything they do. And if she got kicked out of the Temple of Social Justice the acolytes wouldn't be giving her their tithes.

3. Money. Seriously, it really all comes down to money with a parasites like FullMcIntosh and Sockpuppetian.

Leader 12/27/15 (Sun) 08:56:00 36b180 No.310711

>>310699

I've leveled these complaints against people who ate genuine in their beliefs, and basically it's

> we have no power there, so what can we do?

And

> just because it's worse somewhere else doesn't mean we shouldn't address problems here

which both miss the point certainly, but this is what true believers feel.

Leader 12/27/15 (Sun) 15:49:18 89aac4 No.310727

>>310586

Remember in the context of whatever wave of feminism this is:

>it's only wrong if straight white males do it.

Leader 12/28/15 (Mon) 16:53:34 a66534 No.310841

Same reason they don't want to stand up to mexican drug cartels plus

And they believe whatever muslims do is fair game after all the years we have "opressed" them.

Leader 12/28/15 (Mon) 19:45:04 98b8d9 No.310866

Because, silly OP, the pain, suffering and death of people of flesh and blood is hardly as significant as how much skin people who consist entirely and solely of pixels on screens are showing at any given time.

Priorities, man.

Leader 12/29/15 (Tue) 03:46:27 2a818f No.310904

When will people start telling Islam as a whole to fuck off? It's a barbaric religion from the seventh century that is incapable of changing with the times. Surely Obama isn't gonna be able to convince people that "I-it's just a minority you guys! Islam is ~peace~" much longer, right?

At this point I almost want ISIS to make a video thanking the useful idiots of political correctness for letting them do what they want.

Leader 12/29/15 (Tue) 20:25:40 d5d6b3 No.311029

File: 1451420740484.jpg (101.46 KB, 540x960, 9:16, 1440986155316-2.jpg)

When does her tax year end anyway?

Leader 12/30/15 (Wed) 05:29:50 2f086b No.311120

File: 1451453390623.jpg (1.6 MB, 2000x2768, 125:173, 1427057780951.jpg)

>>310586

Because she doesn't have a Patreon about it.

Phantasm!agoricWOck 12/30/15 (Wed) 13:09:06 5738b2 No.311143

>>310904

>At this point I almost want ISIS to make a video thanking the useful idiots of political correctness for letting them do what they want.

Like that will do anything. The PC people will likely find a way to blame whitey still.

Liberal Activist Is Brutally Raped in Haiti by a Black Man – Blames White Men

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/06/liberal-activist-is-brutally-raped-in-haiti-by-a-black-man-blames-white-men/

Leader 12/30/15 (Wed) 20:50:32 cd8d5d No.311169

File: 1451508633200.jpg (216.48 KB, 900x1291, 900:1291, 1438033890476.jpg)

>>311143

Isn't Haiti that shitty Caribean island country that was completely wrecked by an earthquake/tsunami or whatever natural disaster and is yet to recover and likely does not have a fully functional government nor capable of protecting its citizens from each other.

And yet she went there…someone give this woman a Darwin award she deserves it.

Leader 01/01/16 (Fri) 05:44:02 c1ae10 No.311367

>>311169

>fully functional govt

It's one of those governments that are completely corrupt and couldn't give less of a shit about the place if they tried.

Leader 01/01/16 (Fri) 06:29:46 53a5a0 No.311370

File: 1451629786693.jpg (324.66 KB, 825x646, 825:646, 1441307749221-0.jpg)

>>310645

I'll just leave this here

Leader 01/02/16 (Sat) 14:16:53 e20563 No.311480

File: 1451744214708.jpg (407.5 KB, 600x806, 300:403, FUNdamental.jpg)

>>310586

>untermenschen

>subhumans

>make Hitler’s minions look like Boy Scouts

That's a lot of dehumanizing language, anon. You sound like a feminist; an early nineties hutu; a nazi talking about jews, gypsies, and homosexuals; or pretty much any other group that historically was agitating toward genocide.

Quick question, do you think we should violently invade these places?

Leader 01/02/16 (Sat) 18:26:28 9d7e2c No.311494

File: 1451759188989.jpg (25.51 KB, 500x165, 100:33, tmp_3810-41fUa-_QXeL151006….jpg)

>>311480

Found the libtard.

My response to your question is pic related.

Leader 01/02/16 (Sat) 22:56:24 e20563 No.311511

File: 1451775384800.jpg (142 KB, 800x800, 1:1, dubois.jpg)

>>311494

>against genocide

>this means I'm liberal

That's an awful neat jump in logic you've made.

Doe this mean you equate all non-liberals with violent psychopaths?

Leader 01/02/16 (Sat) 23:06:24 d3400f No.311513

>>311511

You're asking a question that has no meaning

Leader 01/02/16 (Sat) 23:52:37 e20563 No.311515

File: 1451778757744.png (306.75 KB, 635x358, 635:358, accreditedandtenured.png)

>>311513

Well, you see anon, if a stance against genocide is conclusive evidence of a liberal - implicitly asserted in >>311494 - this means that all other political positions would preclude the option of anti-genocide stance; meaning all non-liberals are pro-genocide. This is the level of logic you're displaying.

Sure, maybe you're only pretending to be retarded, but I still have urge to pat you on the head and offer you a hard candy.

Oh shit, I shouldn't give you one of those, they're probably a choking hazard for you.

Leader 01/03/16 (Sun) 00:17:41 e20563 No.311519

File: 1451780262600.jpg (66.51 KB, 500x785, 100:157, Tom Covenant the Unbelieve….jpg)

>>311513

Addendum to >>311515

>You're asking a question that has no meaning

You've chosen a very roundabout way to state that you don't understand the question; and then projected your own incomprehension onto me. Bit of a shitty thing to do, anon.

Leader 01/03/16 (Sun) 19:23:05 d742a1 No.311579

>>311494

>citing the title of a book by Michael Savage

Tang 01/04/16 (Mon) 07:08:35 6f1e72 No.311613

>>310586

You dumb OP?

Why you think only the daily mail covers this?

Why you think every leftard out there no longer says 'isis' or 'islamic state' but daesh?

Because they are cucks

Because they can't allow interference in the narrative

Because islam can't be shown as the shit it is so every mention of the evil fucking shit they do has to be scrubbed clean or outright ignored

This cunt here MAKES MONEY OFF SOCJUS

When you niggers are going to get that she wasn't into this shit at all until she figured out there was a payday in it?

And of course these socjus cucks don't want any conflicting arguments so if anita gives them any then the money dries up

And all anita wants is the money

Tang 01/04/16 (Mon) 11:02:25 95bb61 No.311624

>>311370

Swallow what?

Patreon buxx

>>311613

Do you think she has Jewish blood in her?

Tang 01/04/16 (Mon) 14:43:42 3e1ecf No.311637

>>311613

>Why you think every leftard out there no longer says 'isis' or 'islamic state' but daesh?

Here in the UK the leftists such as the BBC call them IS.

Far Lefties love crazy islamists so they want to make them happy by giving them the grand title of THE Islamic State in the world.

Center lefties call them ISIS or ISIL. Which calls them an islamic state but only in the geographic region of Iraq and Syria.

Most others call them Daesh which means old fashioned or throwback. Calling them daesh is calling them a bunch of hipsters. Its not calling them a state or anything official. Its just mocking them.

Tang 01/05/16 (Tue) 15:19:43 f0b030 No.311688

>>311613

>Why you think every leftard out there no longer says 'isis' or 'islamic state' but daesh?

Because Daesh is an Arabic acronym that ISIS hates because it's an insult in Arabic.

they will literally murder you if you call them Daesh in areas they control.

Tang 01/05/16 (Tue) 16:15:40 d3400f No.311693

Because you're calling me a feminist/SJW for calling out both Islam and Anita's bullshit.