>>310897
Reminds me a bit of Dangerous Analysis' take on BBC's 2015 article: "100 Women 2015: Social media 'fuels gender violence'", which included a line implicating the UN.
They wrote "The UN estimates 95% of all aggressive and denigrating behaviour in online spaces is aimed at women" with no source to back it up, and later removed that line without further notice (because it's not the job of journos to inform the public). Dangerous Analysis was hinted to look at a tweet from McIntosh which references the 95% and the UN. Digging deeper, he found out a website that had the exact same quote as Joshnita but lead to a dead link. Searching the URL, he finally found a document from 2006 written by the UN, which doesn't focus on the Internet. Icing on the cake: the 95% are nowhere to be found…
But for good measure let's search for an approximation. The closest available is "96":
>24 per cent of women reported a violent episode from someone outside the family during the 1999 conflict; of these, 96 per cent included improper sexual comments and 92 per cent being threatened with a weapon.
Yes, "improper sexual comments" could be that "denigrating behavior" they are talking about, except the number is wrong (95 instead of 96), the event took place in real-life (and not online) during a time of conflict, the sample was 288 women in a specific location only, and it's not "96% of all aggressive behavior is directed at women", it's "24% of 288 women reported that 96% of aggressive behavior they encountered involved sexual misconduct".