>>311152
>You do have to admire their tenacity
No I don't. I don't admire a hamster repeatedly bashing his skull against the side of his cage, either. I wonder what's so wrong that he wants to make the pain stop, and feel a vague, saddening anxiety that even if I could understand it, I couldn't actually help.
>>311164
In government, when one guy does it, we call it a filibuster.
It prevents actual discussion from taking place, which is the only thing it's designed to do. Deadlock the place.
'Course, we don't really need a whole lot of discussion to be taking place, generally flagrant bullshit is easily smelled by anyone who doesn't smear their upper lip in feces.
>>311430
They can't bore us to death, the people they successfully drove off with the rampant autism might come back, resulting in more overall productivity with fewer entertaining retards. It'd also mean they achieved nothing but wasting their own time to no profit, and they're waaay too narcissistic to admit to that kind of mistake all together, all at the same time.
>>311439
Hi Revolt! See, shilling != criticism, at least directly. We get the term from the king's men, who took the king's shilling to do the king's bidding. They talk up the king, at least publicly, because the alternative is a flogging, or even hanging. They talk up their officers, because, again, flogging. Anyone who regards a concept or place to be beyond criticism - they're a shill. They've taken the shilling, they've drunk the kool-aid. GGHQ's got problems with the revolting rebels, but honestly, the alternatives are all worse. You'll either risk a muzzle and be around others aware that to speak their minds risks a muzzle, or you'll be somewhere that makes this place look like a booming metropolis. If a fourth option exists, by all means, point it out.