/gamergatehq/ - THIRD IMPACT IS NOW UNDERWAY

Thank you anon(s) who made this happen.

>>311103

You're welcome. Thanks for the support. :)

Wow. Who gives a fuck?

>>311101

Why am i not surprised?

Thanks for your work.

Whoever knew it'd be so hard to get them to play by their own rules.

At least I didn't before all this started.

You're a gentleman and a scholar, Lunar.

Godspeed.

>>311121

Canadians.

>>311118

More of a setback than a loss. I'll keep working it. You anons just continue being my eyes and ears and link me to CBC hit pieces.

>>311121

You should, because we have leverage. The other mainstream media outlets that've gone after GamerGate are answerable to the corporations that own them and no one else. The CBC is funded by the Canadian government and the Canadian taxpayers and is answerable to them. So we actually have leverage in this case.

>>311139

>>311140

>>311187

Thanks guys. I'll keep working on it.

Reposting important info from Reddit that's relevant to our interest:

The biggest mistake most people make - and one that I myself did - is file complaints directly with the mainstream media outlets themselves. While that isn't incorrect, per se, the problem with doing that is that the highest level of appeal possible is those cases is with representatives or associates of the mainstream media outlet, such as ombudsmen. And, as the old joke goes, "Kotaku investigated Kotaku and found that Kotaku did nothing wrong." What everyone needs to do is file complaints within 28 days of a hit piece being broadcast with either the CRTC (CBC-related stuff) or the CBSC (all other Canadian mainstream media outlets):

CRTC Complaint Form: https://services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/rapidsccm/Default-Defaut.aspx?lang=en

CBSC Complaint Form: http://www.cbsc.ca/make-a-complaint/

When in doubt, always file complaints with the CRTC. If it's meant for the CBSC, the CRTC will forward your complaint to them. The reason for this is because those organizations are independent of the mainstream media outlets and offer an additional level of appeal in case things go sour.

The second biggest mistake people make is thinking that only Canadians can file complaints with the CRTC when the truth is that anyone can, even non-Canadians. Of course, you need to actually watch the news report in question, but that's easier to do these days with YouTube and file sharing.

>>311101

Good to hear that something productive in terms of getting gg a fair shake in terms of coverage is at least making progress. Pity the CRTC decided to side with the CBC on the original gg hit-piece (then again, not big surprise).

Also, good to know that anyone can file complaints about CBC's bias with the CRTC. That will most definitely be… useful for future endeavors.

>>311458

I fully intend to write a proper guide on how to do file complaints once I finish taking care of some other business that takes precedence.

>>311458

FYI: The more people that make a stink the better, this can all come back to bit the CBC hard in the ass. Everything from requiring all broadcasts to be held, to fines levied by the CRTC, to being made to pay more money for each transmitter in operation.

Thanks for your work, buddy. The CBC in general needs an enema. Never forget that it was CBC brass that looked the other way regarding the Gomeshi scandal, and only acted when they knew shit was about to hit the fan.

As for retards and shills trying to discourage you because "lol canada who cares", fuck 'em. Many of the cancerous elements unfortunately came from canada.

>>311101

You cost the CBC about five figures. Good work.

>>311633

No problem, doing my best. :)

>>311737

How did you arrive at that amount? o.O

>>311632

Actually, when I and a few others started the "file a complaint with the CRTC about the CBC" campaign around a year ago on Reddit and 8chan, our CRTC caseworker said they'd gotten a pretty significant number of complaints in, so don't doubt for a second that we haven't been making noise. :)

>>311458

>Pity the CRTC decided to side with the CBC on the original gg hit-piece (then again, not big surprise).

Just as an addendum to this: There's actually a possibility that the CRTC siding with the CBC is only fleeting. I can't confirm any of this, just consider it a working theory.

My original complaint about the November 2014 hit piece squeaked through on a technicality with the CRTC in January/February 2015. It's possible that they only took into consideration the evidence in the original complaint I filed with the CBC Ombudsman in November 2014 and not the additional information I submitted later - which included the proof I dug up that the interviewee, GAMERella Girl, had lied about being harassed by GamerGate due to supporting Zoe Quinn - because the CBC never had a chance to address that evidence and it wouldn't have been "fair" to them to take that into consideration.

If that's indeed what happened, then the CBC being given a chance to address/refute that evidence now by the CRTC might actually work in our favor. We'll have to wait and see.