/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate Headquarters

Because you know what bloggers respond well to? A bunch of people they don't know sending them scandal reports about a public figure.

This might have worked in 2014 when nobody knew who Anita was, but that's not the world we live in now. Anita was hired because of who she is, and who she is is somebody that gets attacked by "Internet randos."

I know it doesn't feel like it, but the most effective thing now is to ignore her. If you tell people she's terrible, you tell them she's relevant, and she spins relevancy into gold.

>>315734

Dunno, I think we should try but keep it as far from vidya as possible

Like just be the "anonymous tipster" that went to that seminar anita was working at

I would only mention the shit she did before socjus, don't even bother mentioning vidya or GG at all

>>315732

I say that she's Twitter's base goblin now. Bombarding them with bullshit their HR department likely already knows would galvanise them in support of here. I'd much rather let her alienate and piss people off naturally with her being able to use us as human shields.

>>315736

If Anita hadn't built her whole public persona on being somebody who gets harassed by "anonymous tipsters" you might be right.

But it's not 2014 any more. You can't use the same tactics against the same targets and just assume that THIS time it won't make her stronger.

Can GG stop itself from touching the poop? Maybe, maybe not. But YOU decide for yourself whether Twitter gets confirmation from YOU that they hired somebody who is still relevant to the conversation.

I suppose this is why she backed out of Tropes Vs Women series. She's giving up her belief in video game sexism to chase after internet harassment now.

>>315753

>chase after internet MONEY

FTFY

Going from dumb youtuber/speaker to being actually inside the tech industry its a major upgrade for a conwoman who used to be used as a practice mannequin for PUA lessons

>>315746

We're NOT going to shitty blogs like buzzfeed with this anon, we're going straight to twitter investors and biz magazines who are both pissed as fuck at the current twitter leadership for killing 40% of the company value almost overnight

These people supersedes the kind of shitty media anita built her image on, some of these investors OWN the media companies that in turn own the shitty blogs that been defending anita

This time they will have to run the story because the order will come from the very top of the hierarchy

>>315756

Agreed. Maybe more changed her means of conning people.

The more this anti-harassment SJW clique gains control over Twitter, the worse it performs.

>>315756

>Surely this time it will be different…

Have fun licking that poop off your fingers, anon.

>>315732

yep, comparing her to David Duke is fair. Total fraudster and fascist.

>>315756

VC's and investors are pissed as fuck.

If somehow we can reach them with the bullshit these SJW ceo's and admins are pulling, it'll cause them a lot of difficulty finding jobs and influences after the current slow tech collapse.

It will be difficult, but the key is remembering that it was unrealistic and high valuations and private equity that caused the SJW maddess in silicon valley.

>>315732

You have to email every single investor individually with Anita's record, constantly reinforcing that this is who twitter has hired, starting with the most condemning, like her pyramid scheme work.

Start with the biggest investors, and make your way down.

>>315777

>>315787

Already looking for those contacts

I wont mention socjus, GG or any of that shit

My message will be clear: twitter is bleeding money and yet they pay this total fraudster for advice, a person (anita) who has a long story of scams from seminars to cruises to palm reading, she is simply not qualified for the job she is being paid to do

Once blogs have to talk about this because it will be in her firing's press release then the cat will be out of the bag and its very probable that a public debate on how much of GG was lies and smear might being

>>315804

And this is the correct approach. Good work, faggot.

One problem with bringing up the fact that Anita is a scam artist, is that the cunt sadly managed to pull a rarity online in terms of a "delete everything" that could incriminate her.

And the few bread crumbs she didn't delete? Anita's cronies have waged a full on campaign to discredit the evidence and silence ANYONE who dares bring it up (case in point, it's an irreversible permanent bannable offense to ever MENTION Anita's scam artist past and ties to a scam artist who went to jail on Wikipedia, ANYWHERE on the site).

And according to SJW suck up Harris O'Malley, Anita's even gotten into using her kickstarter money to buy off people who could expose her and even buying up incriminating evidence her former scam artist friends had on her, to keep it from getting released.

Makes me wish Milo would do to her what he did to Randi Harper. A multi-piece expose on her scam artist past.

>>315804

Goodspeed, dear leader

>>315844

>And the few bread crumbs she didn't delete? Anita's cronies have waged a full on campaign to discredit the evidence and silence ANYONE who dares bring it up (case in point, it's an irreversible permanent bannable offense to ever MENTION Anita's scam artist past and ties to a scam artist who went to jail on Wikipedia, ANYWHERE on the site).

Dude, we're talking major league investors here, BILLIONAIRES

You think these guys read a fucking wiki? they subscribe to intelligence reports that cost $20k a month, shit thats not on the internet because it takes a lot of money to dig it so its only available for a fee, a big fee

These "crumbs" will get them to call their PIs, their lawyers, their private diggers and go much further than we can. These guys have friends up top, they can get files we don't even know exists, confidential shit, the kind of shit only government has on people

So I'm going for a snowball effect: our data on anita gets the twitter investors to release the hounds and look for more data which in turns leads to anita's firing and public humiliation, and given her position she's going to drag all the other SJWs in vidya and tech with her

Its going to be phenomenal

>And according to SJW suck up Harris O'Malley, Anita's even gotten into using her kickstarter money to buy off people who could expose her and even buying up incriminating evidence her former scam artist friends had on her, to keep it from getting released.

Well duh, theres no honor among thieves man, and just because anita pay them some money to stay quiet doesnt means those investors are not going to outbid anita for that info, though knowing how PIs operate they are probably to go to anita's fellow conmen and force them to talk, after all they are filthy as fuck, no way they are going to take a dive for anita

Anyway, got more on that harris cuck? did he mention who those ex-colleagues of anita were?

>Makes me wish Milo would do to her what he did to Randi Harper. A multi-piece expose on her scam artist past.

In all honesty milo's article on randi was fairly weak, nothing we didn't already know. On the other hand his article on Mr.Butts and his pedoadventures was way more revealing about that tranny shit

>>315734

This. We've gathered enough debunking material on her already. Addressing her falsities served a purpose, how's the time to ignore her, let her go down in insignificance, and all that'll remain are the huge amounts of content proving her wrong and how she was always a con artist.

>>315892

>let her go down in insignificance

Except she isn't, we though she was giving up when she left femfreq but its obvious now she only did that because she was offered a permanent position inside twitter, not as a mere temporal consultant but as a consultant as head of a division.

>>315972

>>315919

This shit is easy to find retard, all public information, you just need to dig around ghazifag

Now this: >>315938 >>315937 is the kind of stuff I need

But this: >>315939 >>315940 >>315941 >>315942 >>315943 >>315944 >>315945 >>315972

This is all GG-era, can't use it. The twitter investors wont care about it, but they will care about his pre-GG pre-femfreq scams, josh fullmac its irrelevant because he wasn't in the picture at the time and even though he is a spineless cuck afaik he wasn't part of those scams, and besides anita is the public figure, he's a fucking cardboard cutout for her show at best, even he knows that.

If you want to help then post all you got on her:

>scam seminars

>her ex-boss from those seminars who went to jail (full real name, reason he went to jail, etc)

>her time in that bullshit costa rica cruise and anyone also involved in that scam

>her time as a palm reader

>her time as a PUA (this, this alone could be used by the investors to destroy her)

Any scrap you got works, we need something so the investors will use their own specialists to dig further than any of us could

>>316013

Dear fuckface,

The Costa Rica trip was organized by Bart Baggett back in 2005. Check "http://costaricabootcamp.com" (redirects to "http://bartbaggett.com/costarica/index.html") on the wayback machine, you're looking for the archive from November 24th, 2005. Here's the link: http://web.archive.org/web/20051124023215/http://costaricabootcamp.com/ .She appears three times on that page: the second picture on the left, wearing an helmet; fourth picture, first line in the gallery; third picture, fifth line, wearing a baseball cap. If you're interested in those retreats, you can also check http://bartbaggett.com/indianadventure, which followed a few years later. That should give you a good start on how they are organized.

Bart is the one who made those PUA seminars, you can easily find a copy of his seminar manual called "the secret to creating chemistry - Mastering relationships & seduction using advanced neuro linguistic programming techniques" on Google. He confirms she worked for him during that period in GuardianLv's article http://guardianlv.com/2014/11/anita-sarkeesian-unmasked-feminist-icon-or-con-artist/ – Although Bart was his boss, he never went to jail.

So, when she was still working with Bart, she met Alex Mandossian (probably thanks to Baggett who was also present at the event). While Bart's testimonial was fond on Mandossian's channel, the video from Anita is no (longer?) there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaPbgNVuaEI (Anita)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5RpxOibtyQ (Bart)

Alex Mandossian is the one promoting tele seminars. Search his name and you'll find link after link of him claiming to be cash machine while hardly attracting any people to his YT channel. Sites like IMReportCard seem pretty optimistic about the guy: http://www.imreportcard.com/people/alex-mandossian – but it looks like a lot of bullshit. Anita didn't work for him, she attended her seminar like many other people. I don't think he went to jail (but his mentor, Bernie Dohrmann, was charged for fraud and deception http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Income-Builders-International/New-Port-Richey-Florida-34655/Income-Builders-International-False-Promises-and-Scams-Beyond-Belief-New-Port-Richey-Flo-670503 )

Now maybe you're talking about Michael Guenther. He's a specialist in tech start-ups, video game developers and manufacturing companies; he's doing financial and taxes consulting and seem pretty Kickstarter-smart. He was the one responsible for the paperwork of Feminist Frequency, and he's the one who thought it would be a good idea to put a redirecting service as an official mailbox.

Michael's many societies (Guenther Entreprise Inc, Autoimmune International Inc, M L Guenther & Co Inc) got suspended from the FTB (Franchise Tax Board) for various reasons. He's currently still holding Guenther & Associates inc. I didn't bother checking this one out ever since.

For your palm reading stuff? I have no idea. That could be Baggett again as he's already Forensic Handwriting Experts.

Unless you actually heard things without checking and are playing the parot.

Regards, the retard.

>>316021

Yeah sorry for the misquote man it was just directed to this smug fag >>315919 (2e5c77) not you