[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/gamergatehq/ - HULKAMANIA is running WILD!

HULK VERSUS GAWKER - ONE HUNDRED AND ~FORTY~ MILLION US DOLLARS!

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A word of thanks to every anon who made these days possible. This is V-G Day, and the rest of the clickbait empire should be very afraid!
YOU DID IT you magnificent bastards!

File: 1458236588212.png (389.87 KB, 1158x840, 193:140, sarkpuppet2-1.png)

ddde8e No.319356

==SHE JUST KEEPS GETTING AWAY WITH IT== Edition

Moved from Kickstarter to Seed&Spark

Asking for WAAAY more money up front

Not even hiding the snakey language

Genre shift off video games to cosplay & history

STILL not done with the first video series

https://www.seedandspark.com/studio/ordinary-women#story

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6CtHk4dzfY

ddde8e No.319357

File: 1458236731497.png (123.76 KB, 1085x986, 1085:986, sarkpuppet2-2.png)

>>319356

>Hello! I’m Anita Sarkeesian. In 2012, I launched a modest Kickstarter campaign to fund a small video series deconstructing representations of women. In an astounding, humbling turn of events, Tropes vs Women in Video Games drew international attention—both positive and negative—and Feminist Frequency raised over twenty-five times the amount we sought. We put it to good use: in the four years since, Feminist Frequency has transformed into a non-profit organization devoted to critically engaging with media. Our videos have focused on examining the way women are represented in popular culture, and reimagining the world of video games as a more inclusive place.

>Starting today, we’re doing something new: a video series called Ordinary Women: Daring to Defy History.

>Rather than heroes, leaders and innovators, women are often depicted and treated as secondary characters in history, objects of affections, damsels to be rescued, or merely the wives, mothers and assistants to the men who achieved important things. Instead, we're taking a look back at the amazing women throughout history who defied gender stereotypes and changed the world, to remind us that the stories we tell about women—in TV shows, comic books, video games and in real life—often reflect the limitations placed on them, rather than the world-changing feats they've already achieved.

>With your help, we can bring their stories to life and give these incredible women the attention they deserve.


55b0b8 No.319359

File: 1458236945600.webm (6.46 MB, 1280x536, 160:67, theinterview.webm)

>>319356

>Reminder that Josh is no longer with Femfreq.


ddde8e No.319360

File: 1458236991854.png (76.95 KB, 711x534, 237:178, sarkpuppet2-3.png)

>>319357

>Who needs Ordinary Women?

>The short answer is: everyone. Given how rarely female leaders and innovators seem to show up in the stories we tell about historical greatness, it might be easy to conclude that women haven't really done that many extraordinary things. Worse, the absence of women from these narratives not only impacts the way society sees women, but the way women and girls see themselves. In reality, women have always done important and ground-breaking things, even if they didn't always make it in the history books. We hope that our project can help shift perceptions of what girls and women can do, not just in exceptional cases but in perfectly ordinary ones.

>We think the stories of these women are surprising—not to mention incredibly cool—and we hope you'll feel the same way when you meet them. We also hope that like other Feminist Frequency videos, they can be a valuable teaching tool for educators around the world.

>What's so special about Ordinary Women?

>Feminist Frequency has an established record of challenging the status quo in ways that make an impact, and we’re going to do it again. This time, it’ll be with a blend of past and present that makes history feel fresh and relevant. We’re committed to telling these stories the right way: accurately and beautifully.

>The series will feature original animation where each episode will have a different visual style inspired by the woman at its center. The episode about Emma Goldman, a political firebrand from the early 20th century, will tell her story through silent era black and white animation. For 10th century Japanese novelist Murasaki Shikibu, we’ll use animation that evokes the aesthetics of Heian period art, pictured below, as well as an original musical score played on a Japanese koto and taiko drums.

>Even Anita’s hair, makeup and wardrobe will be informed by the women she’s discussing, with several outfits inspired by styles they wore in famous portraits. We’ve put a great deal of thought and care into each video, and we believe that this attention to detail and nuance will make these stories even more immersive, engaging and entertaining.

>While the animation in Ordinary Women is going to be beautiful, it isn’t inexpensive. Feminist Frequency has already invested $20,000 in the project to get the ball rolling, and unlike previous Feminist Frequency videos, we shot in a professional studio with a crew that we paid professional rates. And as always, we're putting our videos out there for free, so that anyone with an internet connection will have access, and there won't be any pesky ads getting in the way.


ddde8e No.319361

File: 1458237257436.png (326.72 KB, 659x1040, 659:1040, sarkpuppet2-4.png)

>>319360

Feminist Illuminati tier

$5k - namedrop in credits

Subsidize Subversion tier

$7.5k - namedrop at the front of a video

She's not even hiding it anymore

>already sold out of first half of "let Fem Freq critique your project and make sure it conforms to the narrative"


741fa9 No.319371

>>319361

> She

Anon please, Anita is not Feminist Frequency and the sooner people stop talking as though the organisation is a solo operation, or even suggesting she does anything more than sit in front of a camera or stand behind a podium, the better.

Also, for $5000, you get the reward of having given them $5000? That's a good joke.


a4f6f5 No.319372

Don't get baited.

Anita's moved beyond games and into general cultural criticism. Go after her if you want to, but this really has nothing to do with what GG is "about."


ddde8e No.319378

>>319372

My goal in posting this as OP was awareness, because Anita and Fem Freq has been responsible for a lot of the media smear and unfair reporting we've been subjected to thanks to their incestuous relationship with the reporters who write about them. We should be aware that she's shifted focus slightly off games, and we should remain vigilant as she slides back in, because in 2016 in this project's FAQ, she addresses the unfinished video game series and that she'll finish it this year.

>You're still making videos for Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. How do I know you'll be able to finish this series on time?

>Although the scope of Tropes vs. Women in Video Games expanded significantly due to both the intense backlash and the overwhelming support the project received, we’re well into the second and final season of the series, which we plan to wrap up by the end of 2016. As far as Ordinary Women goes, we've shot all the live-action video and the animators are already hard at work, so we're confident about delivering them on time.


30de31 No.319382

>>319359

McIntosh is NOT off the hook, anon.

He may be crying permavirgin tears that he won't be getting Anita's pussy. But he's gonna try elsewhere. He's still pushing his pro-feminist, pro-Islamic views. That still makes McIntosh a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to both gamers, and the United States Constitution.


5a4a43 No.319399

>>319371

But anon, it's a really good deal! You get the $100 reward, two $250 rewards, and a $500 reward. That's a $1,100 value yours for only the low price of $5,000.


8d597f No.319400

>>319378

Well, gee OP, I guess I won't give her $5000 then. Thanks for the heads up! I'll ignore the fact that you suck cocks.


695a65 No.319404

I like that Anita has moved onto her new scam before she's even finished shitting out the last videos for her last scam.


3cb22a No.319405

I hope she gets arrested for illegal scamming.


5d29d8 No.319410

>>319356

>project under it's goal

>deadline approaching

>all of a sudden "HORRIBLE HARASSMENT FROM GAMERGATE FELLOW XERS DONATE NOW TO STOP THE MUH SOGGY KNEES"

Calling it now.


ff4af0 No.319414

Maybe if we keep giving her more attention, she'll fade away.

Law of averages says that this approach has to work sometime, right? Right.


d9d08f No.319417

>>319356

I wish I'd tracked the metrics over the past few days. Every night or so I average the money donated per day.

So far it's slowed. Noticeably. At one point it was on track to reach 165k at the end of the campaign - now barely over 130k.

Did anyone log this?


b4da99 No.319420

When did she start commenting on cosplay? What are you talking about?


bd40d8 No.319423

>>319359

Wait, what? When did this happen?

Sage cuz unrelated lazy request for story-time


695a65 No.319432

>>319417

That's usually the way crowdfunding works though. You have a large initial burst followed by a trickle of donations then another spike near the end. The game is rigged here though. You know that Anita comes close to failure there will be a deluge of articles from the usual suspects in the press about how you gotta give Anita your money or your a racist/sexist/whateverist.


30de31 No.319434

>>319414

Piss off.


7b1428 No.319438

>>319420

I think it'll be with this new series.

Probably bashing both the men ogling cosplayers and women wearing skimpy outfits of characters– due to men and not by their own volition.


f07931 No.319443

>>319414

"OMG guise just shut up and let me - er i mean - HER get away with another scam!!!"

Its amazing that you think anyone believes you.


6100e3 No.319456

>>319438

Again, where does this come from? The new project doesn't seem to have anything to do with that. I need a source.

If she's stupid enough to start ragging on cosplay, she's going to piss off an ass load of women. That's definitely a female dominated hobby, and they're not going to be brain washed enough not to tell her to fuck off.


521096 No.319463

File: 1458278456044.jpg (358.91 KB, 1966x1364, 983:682, fullmcintosh.jpg)

>>319359

Think his name is no longer found in the new crowdfunding team. https://archive.is/6ha9v

Still it's mostly speculation and hearsay.


521096 No.319464

File: 1458278558667.jpg (96.57 KB, 748x322, 374:161, femen.jpg)

>>319443

Samefagging here, but ignoring their shit doesn't work now.

In fact, staying silent more often than not means complicit approval of radical feminism.


30de31 No.319468

>>319464

And radical Islamism.


d9d08f No.319469

>>319432

Strewth. Thing is, they already raked the pockets of their readers for International Women's Day. At this rate Anita would need a bomb threat to get anyone's attention for Please Give Me Money Day.


737c0f No.319470

File: 1458281455089.jpg (186.75 KB, 400x470, 40:47, 1421011309539.jpg)

>>319456

>ragging on cosplay, she's going to piss off an ass load of women

Unfortunately, there's enough tumbler infecting /cgl/ to make the response mixed, especially anyone who plays pretend dress-up as a gem or related fandumbs.


31bc80 No.319471

File: 1458281619847.webm (6.27 MB, 640x360, 16:9, 3.3gorilian.webm)

Anyone got a Anita version of this?


71b9cd No.319501

>>319471

I really need to know what song that is.


6100e3 No.319516

>>319470

>Unfortunately, there's enough tumbler infecting /cgl/ to make the response mixed, especially anyone who plays pretend dress-up as a gem or related fandumbs.

I don't think Tumblr gives a fuck about Anita anymore. It did back in 2012, but that has seriously waned to the point she's a non-entity. If she starts telling actual women how to dress, good luck with that. It's going to turn the female weeb audience against her that didn't care about GamerGate.


31bc80 No.319517


71b9cd No.319577

>>319517

thanks


988f39 No.319594

>>319359

what movie is this lol


988f39 No.319596

>>319594

nvm, am idiot


a8edf8 No.319824

>>319359

Haha thats quite amusing.

Josh created Anitas persona and made her famous.

But in the end she became so famous that she couldnt be seen in a relationship with a nobody like him.


39b733 No.319894

>>319463

Generally the name coming off something either means there's a dispute among people/ideas(that can include project direction/being pushed out), that a person has left or there's some outstanding legal issue.

Considering the stuff he's tweeting and so on, I'm guessing he was pushed out or there's a legal issue and he's taking pot-shots at her. In any case, I'd be happier if this Jack Thompson/Hillary Clinton wanna-be would just shut up, and try to ruin something else so society at large can see just how shitty of a person she really is.


cfa936 No.319901

>>319894

>Considering the stuff he's tweeting and so on, I'm guessing he was pushed out or there's a legal issue and he's taking pot-shots at her.

Examples? All I can see is Bernie Sanders stuff with Hilldog bashing mixed in.


a8edf8 No.320017

>>319463

> https://archive.is/6ha9v

Its amazing how much they have to scratch the bottom of the barrel to find women who have actually contributed to humanity.


4d5891 No.320031

>>319901

>All I can see is Bernie Sanders stuff with Hilldog bashing mixed in.

>Hilldog bashing

Well well, seems ol' josh fullmac has gone MISOGYNIST

Should we signal-boost the fact that an anti-gamer is also hating on what could be the first female POTUS?

I say we should, then laugh when all of tumblr declares a jihad on josh


7c6e58 No.320039

>>319894

If anything I'd say it's because he's a huge fucking target. You can tear Mcintosh's idea to shreds and ridicule him for days and he can't shield himself by crying misogyny. Well, he can try, and has done so before, but it doesn't work. He's a huge weight around Anita's neck since you can target his ideas and damage Anita's brand by proxy. The only surprise is that she didn't ditch him sooner.


cfa936 No.320049

>>320039

I wonder if he dropped her though, if the "ruined things between her and Joss" thing is true. McIntosh has been at this shit for years and I wonder if over the years shit went south and he just bailed under the impression he could restart with someone else. That Anita's new project seems to have floundered and she's been reduced to asking Tim Schafer and the Cards Against Humanity guy for cash donations seems to suggest she's trying to strike it out on her own and floundering.

Or maybe he's still there and she just wants to make people forget the "puppet" angle, who the fuck knows.


e580bb No.320091

>>319901

It grosses me out to think this slime supports the same candidate I do.

Hasn't anyone told him that not supporting Hillary makes him a misogynist?

>>319464

>staying silent more often than not means complicit approval

That's SJW logic right there. "Either you agree with us or you're enabling the patriarchy"


3cb22a No.320096

File: 1458783196483.jpg (48.74 KB, 336x430, 168:215, CeRZ5jFWQAAgj8K.jpg large.jpg)

Anita is now accusing The Amazing Atheist of harassment because he's working on a fundraising to help females in the third world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLXqJb_Efrk


148e2f No.320114

>>320096

I'd almost like to be charitable here. If I saw someone I don't like doing a charity drive just to fuck with me, like I saw literal Nazis funding African refugee camps to prevent genocide or some shit, it would seem utilitarian to me to act triggered, sperg out and keep the money flowing, because really, why the fuck not if it saves lives are being saved, right?

I absolutely don't believe that's what Anita's game is, though, she sees money flowing and gets triggered over it not being to her. The classy, neutral option would just be to say publicly "Hey, a charity drive? Shit, I can't argue with that like can with this binders full of death threats!", never mind that TB and the like have multiple longboxes of them. But that doesn't feed her narrative, does it?


a8edf8 No.320116

>>319456

>If she's stupid enough to start ragging on cosplay, she's going to piss off an ass load of women.

Her 'male gaze' shtick should have pissed off a lot of lesbians but it never did.

As long as the general point shes making is that men are evil she can support that with completely insulting arguments and nobody seems to care.


5887fa No.320117

File: 1458825447388.jpg (29.73 KB, 604x425, 604:425, 1438757661938.jpg)

>>320096

…Holy fucking shit, Anita Josh, that's just fucking low.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]