[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/gentoo/ - Technology

Install gentoo.

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1411402418315.jpeg (25.85 KB, 450x470, 45:47, Hammerz.jpeg)

 No.243

What are the fundamental differences between HAMMER and ZFS? I want to run DragonFly BSD and find HAMMER interesting, but I'm also interested in the caching capabilities of ZFS. Is one objectively better than the other, and if it's ZFS, can I get it working on DF-BSD?

 No.244

>>243
The system will be used as a home server with a single 2TB drive and two Kabini cores.

 No.250

nobody, huh?

 No.277

ZFS:
>Linux
>FreeBSD
>SmartOS

HAMMER:
>what is this i don't even

 No.278

>>243
HAMMER is great but ZFS is superior.

 No.301

>>278
I've seen benches where HAMMER got hammered by ZFS in speed.

 No.324

>>277
It's the native Filesystem for DragonFly BSD. In a lot of ways, it's very similar to ZFS but doesn't implement the caching scheme of ZFS and runs slower, although it does offer some superior features like instant crash recovery.

 No.551

ZFS does its own RAID, HAMMER doesn't. You can set up softraid and put HAMMER on top of it, but ZFS is smarter about recovery.

 No.585

>>243
why not compare btrfs too?

 No.587

>>585
Not OP, but my guess is
>I want to run DragonFly BSD
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs
>Btrfs (B-tree file system, variously pronounced: "Butter F S", "Butterface",[7] "Better F S",[5] "B-tree F S",[8] or simply by spelling it out) is a GPL-licensed copy-on-write file system for Linux.

 No.588

>>301
I see what you did their.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]