>>88705
>Anyhow faggot if you actually read the damn article you'd realize that the biggest driver of left wing take overs are usually due to the women, especially most western white women nowadays due to most females being natural hypergamists.
And I agree. How does this make Roosh any less of a degenerate fucktwit? The problem with feminism, as you describe in the quote above, is they break down the natural family unit. Pick-up artists, no longer able to marry easily, exploit a broken and corrupt system for selfish reasons as opposed to fixing the actual problem.
>It's a part of their nature to want to extract resources from men on a natural basis. And the vast majority of women are biologically inclined to be collectivists at heart.
Which is itself a collectivist argument; but if you actually talked to a woman without being a beta-cuck OR a pick-up artist like I have you'd realize that. Yet, here you are lecturing others about "muh outreach!".
>And if you actually had sex and real relationship outside of this board you'd know this shit.
I live a chaste life and it has saved me thousands of dollars and the eventual self-loathing pick up artists always face. That is, the ones that do not become pathetic little betas shilling fluff piece articles for their masters.
TL;DR Not being gynocentric does not mean treating women as sub-humans as you purpose here. inb4 "ur calling me a misogynist!"
>>88706
>But since you're a faggot you doesn't like actual content that tells you the truth when it matters here's the original essay attached. All movements usually show signs of left wing corruption the moment the language being used in it becomes warped beyond belief, or through the repetitive use of enemy memes etc.
And? That has nothing to do with what I said. I'll read your book later, but it won't change my mind about you or the masters that bind you.