db70d9 No.46
If you like this board, here are some other boards that may be relevant to your interests:
>>>/beauty/ - Cosmetics, skin care, and general beauty discussion
>>>/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL
>>>/fem/ - General female discussion (NSFW)
>>>/tradfem/ - Traditional femininity
(Let me know if there's any others I missed.)
bb3a0b No.133
>>46There is also these:
>>>/rg/ - For Black identity
>>>/dol/ - For the Latino community
a587b2 No.468
>>>/cute/ Kawaii 2D girls
>>>/grills/ Fashion
ea5810 No.490
>>468I'll suggest
>>>/cm/ in that case.
6c0067 No.577
>>133The oppressed alliance?
>>468/fa/ also works, or should work aswell.
38f0a2 No.594
>>577/fa/ doesn't work because they've only ever catered to men and don't know anything about women's fashion or frankly how to even dress themselves.
7bbde4 No.1153
>>46
why are you listing trad?
don't you know it's a board made by baphomet? I think only trannies post there
speaking of which, was this a board made by baphomet? who's the admin?
also, are we allowed to talk drama here and gossip like a female /cow/ board?
6b88ed No.1158
>>1153
>mfw this post
>why are you listing trad?
Because it's a board related to the topic of femininity.
>don't you know it's a board made by baphomet?
That was just a rumour created by Swami to dissuade people from using other female related boards.
>I think only trannies post there
Nope, just another rumour.
Traditionalist trannies, my sides!
>speaking of which, was this a board made by baphomet
Yes, every board on 8chan was made by /baph/ (except /fem/ of course) but no, not really, That's just another rumour
62cc6f No.1229
>>1153
>>>/tradfem/ is under new ownership, I just checked.
>>1158
Exactly, more division shit and rumours. It is so easy to spread shit on a website like this because of the anonymity aspect. We need to be careful what we believe.
f2e3e9 No.1230
>We need to be careful what we believe.
I couldn't agree more, but I think most users are already aware of this division bullshit.
d3f685 No.1231
>>1230
Apparantly not, because this shitflinging has badly damadged many boards.
f2e3e9 No.1232
>>1231
>Apparantly not
Well, most of the users on my main boarddon't askseem quite aware of what's going, I've also been spreading the word and people seem pretty well informed to me.
>badly damaged many boards.
Do you have any examples of this actually happening?
Also there's this thread >>>/meta/72067
62cc6f No.1233
>>1232
/baphomet/ just quickly reporting in.
The alliance stuff was /leftypol/ drafted. It is rubbish. We wanted to get the divide and conquer problem some attention though.
/beauty/ used to have around 40 UIPs. Check it now. /fem/ was screwed over by swami provoking people everywhere.
You probably aren't to fond of /pol/ but recently there was a lot of attempts to cause massive bleed out in it's population. How many small /pol/ boards currently exist attest to this fact.
I could point out more but yeah.
Finally a note, I'm a /baphomet/ browser. I don't neccesarily represent the whole of /baphomet/ or their views.
f2e3e9 No.1235
>>1233
>/fem/ was screwed over by swami provoking people everywhere.
Heh yeah I know, I took part in the /b/ raid on /fem/. Also I hear that a good amount of fullchan's user-base blames /int/ for most of the cross-board raiding and other happenings, is there any truth to this?
62cc6f No.1236
>>1233
Don't take my word for it, but it seems there might have been an attempt to stir shit up orchestrated offsite, and then /int/ got dragged in and decided to have some fun. They decided to pretend to be the goons from the looks of it.
So, yeah, one way or another /int/ was probablly involved to a greater or lesser extent.
62cc6f No.1237
>>1233
Don't want you to misinterpret anything btw, /baph/ has a thing for /beauty/. Not going to change anytime soon.
We don't want to see small boards get destroyed.
f2e3e9 No.1238
>>1236
Well, I'll be sure to do my own research. Thanks for the info, m8.
also what is someone from /baph/ doing on /girltalk/? That's some pretty suspicious behaviour :^)
62cc6f No.1239
>>1238
We are everywhere :^)
62cc6f No.1242
File: 1429940927705.jpg (Spoiler Image, 21.78 KB, 467x700, 467:700, 1428442038856.jpg)

161f6d No.1466
could you gals please make a "men ask women questions" board that would be very useful and avoid a lot of confusion as to what gender the posters are
acc5d6 No.1472
>>1466
Not something that really needs a whole board. Just make it a thread here. As for identifying which gender posters are, we have the male and female flags for that purpose. What you can do is make a thread on this board for that subject and tell everyone to please use their respective flag.
161f6d No.1479
>>1472
not everyone is going to use these flags and a post can become potentially worthless if it turns out it was made by a guy (for instance getting advice on something and some faggot who didn't care to identify himself as guy responds to you when you were really looking for a woman's opinion).
And this "make a thread and tell them to use the flags" is bullshit, these kind of boards should by default have a rule that requires posters to identify their gender, it's a clusterfuck otherwise
b10bd2 No.1520
>>1466
That's what /fem/ is for.
64664d No.1684
/beauty/ and /tradfem/ got nuked for whatever reason so you might as well take them off the list now.
>>490
Was dead. Now a crime board.
8c8b7f No.1686
>>1684
I see. Given that it has fallen out of date, suppose I'll unsticky it.
ef7f45 No.1687
If anyone here is interested in finding a qt bf, you may be able to find one on >>>/d8chan/. Or not. Who knows?
9bfcb2 No.1688
>>1687
>dating someone you've met on an imageboard
62ba68 No.1691
>>1687
>>1688
Hey, I'd be down to try it if some younger girls that like older guys wind up there.
7ec9ba No.1692
>>1691
Only a guy would say such a shit like that.
I for one would never date any guy from an imageboard.
62ba68 No.1694
>>1692
To be fair, I'm more about making friends at this current point. So, you know, the more cute girls I can be friends with the better. I went from zero in February and March to one in April to up to three now.
9bfcb2 No.1697
>>1694
So you are "collecting" especially young girls at this point?
62ba68 No.1700
>>1697
The way you said that kind of makes it sound like Pokémon, LOL.
7ec9ba No.1705
>>1694
GUYS IN CHARGE OF NOT BEING CREEPY, EVERYONE!
4fc8c0 No.1834
Hello, /girltalk/. I just wanted to let you know that I'm the new board owner of >>>/kind/, and I'd appreciate it if you'd take the time to drop in and say hello. It's not really devoted to the discussion of topics pertaining to femininity, but I think kindness is or should a virtue valued by all, irrespective of gender or race!
yeah, I know that was extremely cheesy :3
6f6c0e No.1835
>>1834
Nice board. Some people here could really learn from it. And by "some," I mean two.
d84450 No.1838
>>1835
>Nice board
Thanks, friend.
f5eae8 No.2637
Should I revise and re-sticky this thread or make a new one? I'm not sure. I want to pick up a few partner boards if possible.
ebae00 No.2640
>>2637
I think a new one would be good, there's some stuff in this one that doesn't really need to be preserved. (like the baph references)
but you can do either, so long as you keep that adorable OP pic
f5eae8 No.2664
Welp, I guess let's get together a list of a few boards to link up with in this thread, and then take it from there.
28d2ec No.2671
This board is pretty gay
in a kinky kind of way
5e406c No.2674
>>2664
keep in mind /tradfem/ and /beauty/ are back to normal and should be included in the new sticky
>>2640
this
aee7e2 No.2686
>>2637
I think you should keep this thread precisely because of these kind of posts:
>>2640
>>2674
>there's some stuff in this one that doesn't really need to be preserved. (like the baph references)
>keep in mind /tradfem/ and /beauty/ are back to normal and should be included in the new sticky
Yeah, right
If you're going to indicate people to other boards who were part of all that board drama, then they ought to know about the drama, and who are the current owners.
I think you should just leave as it is: put all the boards who might cater to women, or at least were created for such, but let people be aware of their history, specially the history of their ownership and moderation. And the best way to do it is to to let anons and anonettes themselves explain it, as it hapenned ITT, because then anyone getting informed about it will also know what's the general feeling of the community towards these boards and the owners. Imageboards do not keep their posts forever, we get to know about their history and the history of the community by what other anons share.
6ca217 No.2688
The new /tradfem/ is full of multiculti images with tumblr filenames and references to the patriarchy. Smells like SRS to me.
5f0173 No.2696
>>2688
Last time that multiculti thread went up in /tradfem/ it was right after the board was reclaimed, it might even been the first thread besides the sticky, and the same happened again after it was reclaimed this time. Pretty sure it is the owner that puts that thread up.
This is from another thread in /boards/
>This is interesting, as you cannot save images from 4chan while retaining the original filename. So whoever this person is who has taken over /tradfem/ several times and keeps posting this multiculturalism thread spends a lot of time posting all over 4chan. Same filenames here, too.
>http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:up5VJgQFLSEJ:https://archive.moe/r9k/last/50/17177263/%2B4chan+%22let%27s+have+some+ethnographic+photography%22&hl=en-CA&gbv=1&&ct=clnk
>http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/55127028/
The 4chan threads have earlier dates than the /tradfem/ threads. It really does look like some SRS fuckery especially with this bully thread made during the first incarnation of the board https://lolcow.farm/pt/res/51609.html
(That thread has posts that sound like it was /beauty/ doing the bullying so was /beauty/ owners SRS or just drama addicts?) /beauty/ always felt off and weird like the owner was trying to get attention and like you couldn't have a good conversation there and threads would get deleted and it was tumblr flavoured. All those cross board parties and random posts like "hi /fit/ here I love your board" "/baphomet/ here I have a crush on you /beauty/!" like pure samefaggotry by the owner. As well as some weird vibes about other small boards not being allowed to get mentioned on /beauty/. I stopped posting there because the moderation and community seemed fishy at the time.
Why can't we have nice things?
6ca217 No.2699
>>2696
>/beauty/ always felt off and weird like the owner was trying to get attention and like you couldn't have a good conversation there and threads would get deleted and it was tumblr flavoured.
I didn't notice that at all, from what I saw there was a lot of good discussion in there from a lot of knowledgeable posters about makeup. The only thing I heard that were getting deleted were shitposts about things like "patriarchal beauty standards." Also /baphomet/ and /beauty/ actually did get along well, I remember when they were being cute together in /am/'s teaparty. My beauty/baphomet ship was sunk… :(
48954e No.3776