/gsm/ - Gender & Sexual Minorities

>>33
Asexuals? I'm probably one. Though I don't really embrace the term but rather acknowledge the absence of the appropriateness of literally any other one.

No idea bout the pic, looks like a typo to me. Seems weird too that asexuals "come out". Most romantic relationships begin with physical intimacy and, if that works out, moves to intercourse fairly swiftly. You'd know if your asexual then. And even if you are, it's not like sexual activity needs to be stopped because of it (as the pic states also), only that the partner might well not have as much fun if you only do it to "please" her or him - pun unintended but unavoidable.

>>34
Like any label, it's mostly about convenience. If I'm talking to someone who understands it, then I would just tell them I'm asexual. If I'm talking to someone who isn't into sexuality knowledge I'd just say I'm not into sex and don't want to have sex.

>>35
I think this is the case as well, but it seems to me like many labels are considered to be vital parts of a persons (public) identity. They are embraced and celebrated and, to varying degrees, even institutionalised. Hence my trepidation.

>>33
>what the hell does the last line mean?

Looks like a typo to me. Probably meant to say frequency of activities, i.e. one partner wants a lot of sex, other partner doesn't want sex at all, so they choose a compromise somewhere in between, having sex occasionally.