No.108203
I love bd girls, and I love you guys, so please, have some
No.108216
she is my fave, you should see the juicier pics. if any one wants to see more of a specific girl all ya gotta do is shout MOAR
No.108233
that's all for now folks i've still got a load of pics to sort through before i can post any more, till next time (feel free to bump asking for more of a girl already posted)
No.108234
>>108232
sorry m8 i don't have kik, might have a look at it and see what i can do but these pics are on my computer and not my phone anyway
No.108236
just also want to quickly say, why do we never see bd girls around? of all the models/studios where the girls get their bits out, bd is easily the best. make up, lighting, hair all a bit more natural , and thus sexier, than ls, and the constumes generally are more restrained, while the number of actualy qt's that shot with bd is far, far higher than ls, ls seems to mostly have munters. combined with the wacky costumes, hair and make up, even a qt at ls would always look better at bd imo.
any way, hope you enjoy/ed
No.108239
>>108235
sent you a message m8
No.108307
Son todas unas niñas preciosas, pero la que me vuelve completamente loco es Biatriche
No.108319
No.108327
>>108319
thats about all i can get away with posting m8
No.108329
>>108327
How far does she go in the actual set?
No.108330
>>108329
legs akimbo m8 they all do
No.108331
Man i adore them in the high heels, they all look like complete lil sluts
No.108335
>>108330
we need a dl for this
No.108336
>>108330
What a little doll.
No.108342
>>108331
You had my curiosity, now you have my attention.
No.108355
>>108353
Post some frontal ones king?
No.108356
>>108353
Post some frontal ones king?>>108354
No.108357
>>108350
>>108312
>>108353
you`re making my dick so hard
MOAR elona, MOAR alinka, MOAR green bathroom!!!
No.108358
>>108355
>>108356
>>108357
i already pushed it to the maximum level for 8ch, i don't think we can go any farther :)
No.108359
>>108358
just keep posting on this level. elona, alinka and green bathroom are my votes. keep gooooingg
and thx btw
No.108360
>>108358
Give us a link to download all what you got m8
No.108361
>>108359
I've seen it pushed further. Be a Valentines Hero :):)
No.108362
108231 please more of her or108228 they are hot!
No.108364
No.108366
No.108368
>>108365
>>108358
>>108367
THANKS A LOT
anyone got any keywords, links, hints to where to get working links to download all BD and LS?
No.108372
>>108367
At least give us a link to download some sets
No.108379
>>108378
A links from "you"
No.108381
>>108231 wow these are goooooood! bd did have natural beauty please go on
No.108382
>>108219
MOAR
show us her perfect EVERYTHING
any anus pics (any girl)?
No.108384
>>108211
>>108350
>>108312
>>108231
>>108224
>>108220
>>108209
MOAR pics like these, that don`t break the rules but still show good stuff!
No.108387
>>108383 thanks OP these are awsome! love those little blonds, seen more of her she has kind of crossed eyes, makes her even more cute!! have any more?
No.108390
>>108203
Shit all booty pictures has been deleted
No.108392
>>108390
we can stil get booty pics like
>>108384
which the mods are fine with. any kind soul has LS and BD pics like those to share? a few hundred would be fine.
8-)
No.108396
It's a good thing I saved when I could.
No.108407
No.108426
>>108382
out of everything, this post is what killed it . . . :(
No.108449
dont worry, im here to rescue :)
No.108450
No.108452
>>108451
upload a mirror of the censored ones somewhere, then put a link or hint here
No.108454
>>108453
thanks.
think of a way to post the censored ones to us, be it in a temporary image site, link ro whatever
No.108458
>>108455
Any way to save those pics? Right click doesn't work, neither does Image Downloader. And yes, I am a newfag
No.108459
>>108458
theres a setting i can change. ive set them to free download :) right click
No.108460
>>108459
Bloody brilliant!
No.108461
>>108459
is someone reporting? i was halfway saving and they were gone
No.108462
>>108461
I can't get to it I get the 403 error.
No.108463
>>108462
It appears to have been reported and taken down
No.108464
No.108467
Damn you unsee why are you blocked too me?
No.108468
>>108466
wow... not even 5 minutes
i'll do some reasearch and find another. dont worry.
No.108469
hey.. whats that website that can post images from everyone? i knjow chatzy.. but this one slips the mind
No.108470
It is working just don't hot the back button
No.108471
>>108470
which one is working?
No.108472
Genius. Please keep going. Wow
No.108473
No.108474
Up for a few minutes but if you click on pic it closes.
No.108475
>>108474
And I can't even get to it for some reason.
No.108477
>>108470
So no saving pics and no refreshing, then?
No.108478
>>108474
talk clearly. which one?
No.108479
>>108476
this ones simple. click to shown, click again to download
No.108480
>>108479
doesnt go into the room
No.108481
Can someone help? I"m not quite following.
No.108482
>>108481
Don't bother, they're all down as far as I can tell
No.108483
Dude I guess just post what you have since it wants to be a bitch.
No.108511
>>108206
more of this one?
No.108514
>>108503
i love the one of her asshole close up. i wanna lick it!
No.108518
>>108515
See, little girls love dick.
No.108526
OP here, thanks to the dutiful anon(s?) who continued what i started and then some (I helped add a bit to your mischief later). Me and Nicccccco would love to chat to you
No.108542
post some artsy LS girls as well
these pictures are really pretty
anyone know why LS/BD got shutdown, or can give me a run down of their history?
No.108558
>>108542
Im not entirely sure, but i think it had something to do with nude sexual pictures of underaged girls, of course thats just a guess.
jeez
No.108574
No.108581
>>108542
Don't know exactly about the backstory for BD (& its variations), but I know
that with respect to LS (& all of its permutations), they managed to successfully
hang-out in the grey-area/netherworld of what constituted supposed
'artistic images' for quite some time.
Then in one of their 'bonus' videos with one of the 'older' girls, the guy behind
the camera just couldn't keep his hands off her & played with her 'privates'.
That gave the authorities the excuse that they were waiting for...., and boom....,
no more LS.
>Way to kill a good thing.
No.108586
>>108581
100% confirmed. LS was most of the time either right on the line, or slightly over it. There was no shortage of nudity and overt exhibition of little girl pussy. But seeing as there was no sexual activity involved, I think there was never an endangerment factor, and the lines remained obscured. As soon as an adult was confimed as having and recording sexual activity with one of the girls (she wasn't even really that young, probably 15/16) the moralfag mob went wild and got the Ukrainian government to shut it all down.
Whats really ashame is that sites like teenfuns and angelfuns with 14-18 yo girls were basically fine. They put dildos in their pussies and got fingered by men, and some of those vids can still be found on redtube and pornhub type sites.
No.108587
That's not the video that killed LS
And teenfuns and angelfuns were 18+
No.108590
>>108587
im going to disagree with you on angelfuns and teenfuns. there were clearly girls under 18. but i will admit that i could be mistaken about LS, I'm sure lea was after them for a while
No.108592
>>108590
They all looked like old bitches to me
No.108597
>>108587
Okay..., genius....,
Which video was it then, because the 'conventional wisdom' on the subject
is that it the 'bonus06-01-01' video that ultimately caused the 'LS Door Slam'.
As far as teenfuns & angelfuns are concerned, it is also my understanding that the girls
were 'LS Alumni' who had reached the 'age-of-consent' (which may, or may not, have been 18yo at the time..., I'm not sure).
(P.S. I'm that >>108581 guy.)
No.108602
>>108597
>As far as teenfuns & angelfuns are concerned....
Oh, and, also 'pinkteens', btw.
No.108603
>>108592
i agree wholeheartly. i prefer delicious flat-chested 9y olds myself. but thats why those sites were overlooked and their content is still floating around on the clearnet, cause most 15/16yo can reasonbly pass for 18+
No.108605
>>108597
I always site that video myself as well. It was really the straw that broke the camels back. Even if it never specifically came up in any statements by lea, it was still a very clear turning point. With that vid, LS went from tasteful erotic nudes to flat out pornography. And it wasn't really highly produced, and good looking like the photos were, it was this vid that envoked that weird, basement child-porn kind of feel, where you dont see the man, and the girl appears apprehensive. When I first saw it, I was markedly disappointed cause while it wasn't necessarily abusive, but it certainly represented a diversion from the normal style of natural beauty and innocent sexuality.
No.108607
>>108605
>.... diversion from the normal style of natural beauty and innocent sexuality.
Wholeheartedly agree.
They sometimes dressed them up like 'prosti-tots', but still managed
somehow to preserve their age-appropriate innocence.
The other thing that the LS (and BD) productions had going for them was age-diversity.
While my personal preference lies in the 9-12yo range, they really
always had something for everybody.
No.108608
>>108607
>still managed somehow to preserve their age-appropriate innocence
It all comes down to respect and acceptance.
They repected the girls, treated them well, and kept a level of professionalism. This shines through, and you see naturally happy girls, quite content to take their clothes off and show off their fantastic bodies.
They accepted the girls for what they were, just that, little girls. They are energetic, silly, and have short attention spans. They also have a curiosity about sexuality, but do not possess that frantic and sometimes crass desire that adults have. So accepting their limitations in understanding and desire really prevents abuse and retains their cuteness and lovable qualites.
I've often stated that LS level of stuff really should be legal. It would solve more problems than it would create.
No.108609
>>108581
>>108587
>>108597
>>108605
A screencap from " That " video. The model is Alla, / Anfisa / Dayanna .She started with LS and then went to Teenfuns/Angelfuns, and still works in nude modeling today
No.108610
^WTF^, she look legit 18... :o
Anyway, greatness of LS is not only the nature, full of freedom approach, I'd like to point at the quality of pics as well - 15 years later you still gotta scroll or "fit to page" them on average monitor screen.
It's mind-boggling, kudos to Ukrainian artists.
No.108611
>>108608
Yes exactly !!!
I think part of the reason for that was because a very great number of the LS videos (& I suspect photo shoots also)
were actually shot & directed by a young woman. Especially during the 'LS Dreams' era you can hear her gently 'coaching' the girls in the background.
That approach of showing young pre-teen & hebe girls just being their fun, silly & sometimes goofy/awkward selves is
why I am also partial to the old ShowStars videos.
(I have a special place in my heart for that girl 'Arina'...., what a cute, little goofball.)
BTW...., here's Arina.
No.108612
>>108609
That's the one.
She also did a large number of two-girl videos & photo-shoots with that flat-chested blonde girl
who went by various names including 'LenaB', 'Marina' & 'Oksana'.
(And who I find oddly attractive in a 'tomboy' sort of way.)
This is her.
No.108615
>>108614
what an absolute angel
No.108620
>>108609
probably should point out because it might matter, that this vid had no soundtrack
No.108622
>>108621
The 'Marina'/'Tanya' video where she greases herself up with Baby Oil is awesome !!!
No.108623
>>108622
yup, and like an hour long too.
No.108624
anyone have torrent links for this stuff?
No.108625
No.108626
>>108623
Yeah...., a lot of those BD videos REALLY long & decent quality too !!
The were among the first to use quality codecs.
No.108628
>>108624
Torrent = Bad Idea Always
TOR = Bad Idea Mostly
(Plus you spend half your adult life trying to actually FIND the content you are seeking.)
Freenet = The Lesser of the Evils Available
Yeah okay..., it's slow. But TOR doesn't exactly run at the speed of light, either.
There are a couple of 'theoretical' claims (operative word being 'theoretical') of ways in which
Freenet's security 'could be breached', but there is not a single documented case of
someone getting busted through Freenet.
TOR on the other hand..., well..., most of us are aware of the repeated horror stories.
Finally, and most importantly, accessible content !!
There are tons of websites (aka 'freesites') dedicated to what you are looking for.
Many are complete archives of the old favorites like BD, LS, etc..
A good jump-off point for anyone who frequents /hebe/, /cutegirls/, and the like, is
a Frost/FMS board called: ' Hussy '.
Just sayin'.
No.108634
please moar Alena
please please
and thank you for this thread
No.108635
>>108628
I'll admit, I've never heard of "freenet"...
But I knew to avoid torrents, and I have heard about the TOR Horror Stories...
No.108637
No.108638
>>108635
Cross-platform (requires most current Java).
Get it, and more info here:
freenet.org
No.108639
>>108628
OP here
THANK YOU for this post.
No.108640
>>108638
>freenet.org
I think it's freenetproject.org?
No.108641
>>108634
i might be able to post more of her later this evening when i get home, we'll see
No.108643
No.108646
>>108637
First..., no system is perfect...., it is only as effective as the idiot using it.
Second..., I am familiar with this case.
1. The 'idiot' in question wasn't busted through, or as a result of, using Freenet.
A 3rd party actually observed that he had illicit content on his computer & squealed to LEA.
2. When they grabbed him, he happened to have Freenet running at the time (on a public, insecure wifi network..., which is another whole level of stupid, but not related to the case).
3. Because Freenet was running, LEA was able to observe/log the IP addresses of other Freenet users by observing his running instance....,
HOWEVER --
Not a single one of those disparate IP address users was ever raided, arrested, prosecuted, or otherwise bothered by the whole incident.
WHY ??
(This is a very over-simplified explanation.)
Because at any given point in time, EVERYONE connected to Freenet is simultaneously downloading & uploading/serving, any or all of the files on Freenet iin tiny, little, heavily encrypted pieces.
There are NO web servers (unlike TOR) and there is no way to determine what pieces of what files are passing through your computer.
Not by you...., not by LEA.
Even in some imagined worst case scenario where LEA decides you should get V& because they saw your IP address on Freenet,
there is no way to determine (short of finding your actual personal stash of unencrypted, illicit material) whether you are looking at someones personal blog ('Flog' in Freenet-speak), looking at WikiLeaks, old Playboy Centerfolds, or 'Daisy's Destruction'.
At all times, just using Freenet gives you full, 'plausible deniability' (i.e. 'ignorance is bliss').
No.108647
>>108640
Oopsie..., you are absolutely right !!
It is: freenetproject.org
(Been a long time since I actually downloaded/installed it. It just auto-updates since then.)
No.108648
No.108652
>>108646
You're working on convincing me . . .
No.108653
>>108611
To confirm your point, the model Dasha/Anya stated in her short autobiography posted on 8chan a few months ago that working with LS was very upbeat and that most of her photographers were " Big Sister " types . In the Video that accompanied her " Fruit " photoshoot , it's all very " chatty " girl talk and giggles even during re-takes, and yet still very professional, - despite the annoying Hip-Hop morning radio program playing in the background .
No.108656
>>108651
what else was this girl in apart from that one issue of ls magazine
No.108658
Damned hard to find a photo of Marina with her pretty long blonde hair down that can get past approval, she was easily my Favorite .
I think these 3 from her " green " set should be OK, at least you get to see her long lovely stems ...
No.108659
No.108660
>>108652
Again..., with the caveat that 'no system is perfect'..., I restate that there is not one, single case of
anyone using Freenet being arrested or prosecuted as a result of Freenet itself.
You cannot be prosecuted for having a tiny, encrypted piece of a larger & further encrypted file, which does not reside on any server anywhere,
pass through your network/computer while neither you, nor LEA, can possibly know what piece of what file it is.
Otherwise backbone carriers like Level 3, Cogent, AT&T, etc. would all be in jail for the packets of data that traverse their networks.
The 'single point of failure' in Freenet is the end-user.
It is what you do with & how you store your files once you have them that is critical.
No.108661
>>108660
How do you suggest said files get stored?
On site?
Encrypted on site?
Removable media?
Encrypted removable media?
What programs are viable for encryption?
I recall something about TrueCrypt being cracked
No.108662
>>108656
She was in LOTS of other LS (& LS affiliated) photosets & videos.
(She's one of my favs, too.)
She also did some teenfuns/pinkteens stuff when she got older.
I hate to keep harping about Freenet..., but...,
There is a website (aka 'Freesite') on Freenet called ' LS Finder',
which is an INVALUABLE resource for 'collectors'.
You can search/find a model by way of a 'known set/video', by 'name', or even by her 'face' & it will show all of the known photosets or videos that she did for any studio/producer,
as well as provide direct Freenet links to preview/download the stuff.
It's great !!
No.108665
>>108659
well, thanks for everyone who showed up. i think i'll be back in a couple days.
No.108676
>>108661
Well..., keeping in mind that I do, in fact, wear a tinfoil hat everyday her is what I do:
Absolutely on site !! I will NEVER keep sensitive files on some third-party server that will most certainly keep logs of my IP address, whether they are encrypted or not.
On my Win7 system I have a 4TB externat SATA volume which is entirely encrypted using VeraCrypt..., the successor to TrueCrypt.
(See: https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/ )
I run Freenet inside of a Lubuntu (14.04) virtual machine using VMware (although VirtualBox is okay..., I just prefer VMware's networking).
The virtual machine itself..., that is..., the *.vmdk's, config files, etc..., is seperately encrypted using AxCrypt.
(See: http://www.axantum.com/AxCrypt/Default.html )
It (and some other VM's) live on the VeraCrypt encrypted eSATA 4TB HDD.
If push really came to shove & the barbarians were at the gate, as it were, I could just yank the eSATA drive in about a half second & throw in into the microwave oven on 'High'.
Bye, bye evidence.
No.108681
>>108628
I haven't downloaded shit, but why exactly torrents are bad?
No.108683
>>108681
Torrents are fine for some things..., just not for 'questionable' things..., not at all.
When you are downloading files using your preferred .torrent client (uTorrent, etc.) have you ever clicked on the tab that says 'Connected Peers', or something like that ??
Well..., all of the IP addresses that are listed (usually also geo-located) belong to people who are actively downloading and/or uploading the exact same files that you are.
If one of them looks at their 'Connected Peers' you (and your location) will show up..., plain as day..., to them also.
This is exactly how people get snagged every day by MPAA honeypots downloading/seeding newly released (or unreleased) movies & reported to their ISP for copyright violations.
You may be one of those people feel comfortable by saying: "I'm using a proxy", or, "I use a VPN".
Well..., no matter what they may say and as a practical matter..., there is not a single Proxy or VPN Admin who will not turn over your IP information
at the drop of a hat when formally requested by LEA/Government Authorities. Period.
And that, 'Grasshopper', is why .torrents are bad for 'questionable things.
No.108687
Alright...., I'm really tired of talking about all of this encryption tech, and so on.
Back to 'On-Topic' now.
Here's BD 'Lena'.
No.108689
>>108687
Another random BD girl.
No.108691
>>108690
A few more 'Polina'.
No.108692
>>108676
I meant removable media as in USBs or ExHDD
No.108694
>>108689
what an incredibly delectable and sexy little bitch that thing is
No.108695
>>108692
Read it more closely.
'eSATA' = external SATA = Removeable = >yank it in a half second
Google 'eSATA'.
USB would would in the described setup but eSATA is a WAY faster (6 Gb/sec.) interface than USB is.
Also here's some BD 'Vika'.
No.108696
>>108695
>USB would would....
Oops....,
USB would WORK....
No.108697
>>108694
Indeed.
Don't know her name though..., but here's a few more.
No.108706
>>108703
And it is in no way 'on-topic'.
No.108709
No.108711
>>108709
It is a 650MB+ RAR of totally random, mostly low-res pics with 100's of duplicates
and maybe 10 images worth even glancing at.
Every single thing in it is available in a 'set-organized' & hi-quality/resolution elsewhere on 8chan /cutegirls/ or /hebe/.
Also..., this is a 'BD Girls' thread.
Therefore: Is ShitPost.
Feel free to waste your time, though...., it's your bandwidth.
No.108712
Anybody know who this is?
No.108713
>>108712
Don't have a name & only have a partial set that starts right in with the nudes.
Cute, though.
That's the difficulty with trying to post BD girls on 8chan..., with all the full sets that I have the girl
is already naked by image number 10.
(Which is usually not a problem at all - lol.)
Also..., have some more BD 'Polina'.
No.108716
>>108696
I was skimming, my bad.
No.108718
>>108715
More of this girl.
No.108720
>>108719
Please continue, sir.
Like I said here:
>>108713
It takes serious effort to adhere to the 8chan rules when posting from these BD sets.
No.108722
>>108720
>It takes serious effort to adhere to the 8chan rules
dude, i'm having so much trouble, lol
No.108725
>>108722
Yeah man...., the BD sets get real naked, real quick.
Your pretty much stuck posting images numbered 1-8 out of any given set.
In the hour-long videos you get like the first 60 seconds
of NN content before...., 'blammo'..., 'This is not the webm you thought you could make'..
No.108727
>>108719
crap is getting delete already . . . sorry . . . :/
No.108729
>>108727
This girl has a great video, too !!
No.108734
>>108729
she has the that perfect sexy/cute combination!
No.108736
>>108729
>>108734
maybe some more . . .
;)
No.108737
i hope these aren't too boring . . . lol
No.108739
>>108611
do you still have her stuff?
No.108741
>>108739
I'm pretty sure I have everything (pics & vids) that 'Arina' did at ShowStars.
The VladModel stuff she did..., not so much.
No.108750
>>108725
>Yeah man...., the BD sets get real naked, real quick.
damn, i wish i had those
No.108751
>>108563
>>108634
>>108641
oh, i promised this girl earlier
No.108752
>>108750
all my photos in my collection are just nudes, so i went on usenet and downloaded some stuff to post tonight, that's where i recommend you get it from. there's 100's of gigs of ls and bd sets in there
alt.binaries.faxmaster
No.108757
Hmm, the OP gets me all excited with a couple of pics of Oksana then leaves me high and dry. So here's a pic of her in her birthday suit which should be OK (I hope).
No.108764
>>108586
So how come those angelfuns and teenfuns didn't suffer the same fate?
No.108775
>>108764
Because all the girls could pass for 18+. So the casual passerby, who happens onto a site by chance, just takes it for another "teen" site and moves on.
Only if you were paying very close attention, or recognized a model from earlier stuff was there any indication that "hey, wait a sec, is this girl . . . under 18? oh well, I already watched and fapped a bunch of times . . ."
No.108784
the vid that's out on the clear net is of this girl getting fingered by the photographer. litterally, all you have to do is video-google "teenfuns nansy" or "teenfuns sabine"
lol she's like 14/15 in the vids that will come up
No.108790
No.108796
>>108775
I remember teenfuns, angelfuns, pinkteens as just re-branded images from "Lolitafix". They took the NN images of the younger girls and full sets of the older looking girls and resold them under different logos.
No.108802
>>108796
There's a blogger with like a dozen lolitafix sets up.
No.108807
>>108796
ummm dude, you have it backwards . TeenFuns/ AngelFuns was a Huge site about 100 Photosets. Lolitafix was the little guy who came along later, borrowed certain sets from TF/AF, removed all the vag. shots, and re-named them
No.108808
>>108807
lolitafix girls look much younger than TF/AF girls. TF/AF girls all look at least in high school.
lolitafix seem about 7th grade.
No.108812
>>108775
The studio covered its ass by having each model sign a statement saying they were born after a certain date, they didn't have to show an ID because in that part of Eastern Europe few girls of any age had a driver's license , or need for a Photo ID.
Your signature was enough. - And Yes !, it's happened right in the USA, went on for 4 years, one model doing extreme hardcore, Movies, magazines, every outlet, - and one day the Beautiful Traci Lords said to no one in particular " Oh !, BTW I had just turned 15 when we started doing this " All hell broke loose .
Every Red Blooded American guy was in possession of some extremely incredible child porn , video stores had to clear their shelves - Destroy Everything !
No.108815
>>108807
Who knows, maybe your correct, But I remember a lot of the same models from both lolitafix and teenfuns, and they always appeared much younger in the lolitafix sets. So I would assume that site was online first.
No.108816
>>108815
I remember the teenfuns girl Nancy doing lolitafix sets. She was still pretty much flat chested. Maybe 11-13, also that teacher/naughty student set, that was lolitafix. I can't find an image from that set, but it was a good one.
No.108831
>>108816
this set perhaps ?
No.108879
>>108752
I've never understood usenet... isn't it a pay service, or something?
No.108888
>>108879
Usenet is as old as the internet itself. Its been around since before there were giant ISPs like aol, comcast, verizon. So since it exsisted in a time before commercial internet access was popular, there were companies called 'usnet providers' that provided access to the usnet.
So in a sense, it is a pay service, just like the internet is a pay service. You also need a usenet reader, because most of the messages are encoded to allow multiple messages to be combined together to represent larger files, ie archives, vids, etc.
It's really an antiquated system from the 80s, but because there's no one central server, it more resembles an early type of p2p type network. That being said, material posted is difficult to censor, and provides a non-traditional way to share content.
It should be stated that your anonymity on usenet is one-way. You can download almost 100% without being tracked. Uploading is significantly more treacherous, unless you know exactly what you are doing.
No.108896
Let me stress the point that the usenet is old technology. To use it, and get anything useful will require patience and attention to detail. You will also need to *gasp* do some reading, and have an solid knowledge of computers.
The terabytes of LS/BD, as well as siberian mouse, yvm, candydoll/xlola and much more await you . . .
No.108898
>>108888
>You can download almost 100% without being tracked.
why is it that all you ever hear as far as privacy recommendations go is "TOR TOR TOR" and not USENET???
No.108903
>>108898
Like I said, usnet is old. Not many people pay attention to it. Also, activity has died to an almost stand-still. There is not really any new stuff there, everything is old content from 5-10yrs ago.
No.108905
>>108509
Olenka...HOly Shit what I would give to f*ck that girl.
No.108907
>>108898
>>108903
I will say that usenet providers give u VERY fast dl speeds. 90% of all BD, angelfuns, teenfuns and lolitafix sets could be downloaded in less than a day. You'd probably have close to 10k photos to sort through after dl'ing just those
No.108914
No.108917
>>108914
hey, don't believe me, i don’t care. but your paranoia doesn't change the fact that loads of excellent content exsist in various places, waiting to be found by the intrepid explorer.
just relax, stay calm, fly under the radar, and don't do stupid shit and you'll be fine, no ones going to bother you, or care that u look at stuff from 10yrs ago
No.108918
What usenet provider has them?
"Newshosting" has almost nothing...
No.108919
>>108918
astraweb is probably the provider that censors the least. i used giganews for years until they started dropping certain groups
No.108921
>>108919
this is confusing... so even if you sign up you might not have access to "everywhere" in usenet?
No.108923
>>108921
yes, this is true. also, different providers have different retention rules for messages older than a certain date. so u might get a group, but then you might only be able to dl portions of sets or files because some of the messages have been purged. then you need to use par files and all that stuff . . .
like i said, it's there, but you have to work for it and read about how things work. it can get quite technical and granular, its not as straightforward as tor. when i started, there was no tor or freenet, or even any chans like this, so i learned to traverse usenet
No.109025
there isn't much going on usenet nowadays. On topic groups are mostly just full of spam and old regular posters are long gone. I don't think I have been downloading anything much for a five years or so.
Miss the good old days though. Got way more pizza there than from TOR. But not anymore.
No.109032
>>108919
Astraweb is just the cheapest one, and parts randomly go missing and I wind up using free trials elsewhere when that happens
Frankly Usenet was only useful to get Candydoll, and now that we have that big-ass torrent there's not really a use for it anymore
That said if I make big shares again Usenet will be the #1 choice as it's the most convenient on both ends
But you'd be a fool to get BD from Usenet, or at all really
No.109035
>>109032
>But you'd be a fool to get BD from Usenet,
> or at all really
Uh....whys that?
No.109040
>>109036
Not falling for it.
No.109044
>> 108831
I loved the teacher/naughty student set.
Is this one available on torrent, does anyone have the magnet link for it?
No.109047
>>109040
What did it say???
No.109052
>>109025
yeah, it's pretty much dead. i've thought about getting rid of my accounts. i keep them mainly for sentimental value, and cause every once in a while i need to quick dl a bd/ls set to share with somone.
as tor and freenet were coming up, i was hesitant to dl anything mainly just because of speed. when tor first started, it was so painfully slow, i felt like i was back on dial-up. i would just wait for stuff to show up on usenet so i didn't have to leave my computer on for 3days to dl one vid
No.109053
>>109032
One thing that's great about usenet is it's basically free cloud storage. In theory, you could take a very large amount of data, encrypt it, split it into part files and upload it to an inactive newsgroup. Then come back months, or even years later and dl all your stuff.
No.109061
moar anna please >>108323
>108323
No.109062
>>108309
moar ira please too
No.109063
>>108503
and Janna also please
No.109089
>>108609
bitch was coked out as hell in that video
No.109097
No.109152
No.109154
>>109152
why, in the fucking name of all that is good, did you bump this thread?
No.109163
>>109162
Sage are these from the site itself?
No.109167
>>109163
no don't be ridiculous. these sites are long gone. also, some of these are re-branded with the mydreamlolita watermark
No.109704
No.110190
>>110078
Bare booty finally back.
No.110263
this thread is the best
thank you for all the posts
No.110352
>>110349
She has a nice sword I think I can recreate it?
No.110382
>>108712
This is Anna from Young Strawberry
No.110387
>>110382
Young strawberry songs more like an all girl band from Japan. Like Baby Metal.
No.110407
No.110430
No.110484
>>110407
>>110430
OK, here's a few more.
No.110493
>>110078
ok, so my post gets deleted, but not these
hmmm . . .
No.110520
>>110382
I can't figure it out.
No.110524
np I had a simialr thing happen to me last year
was banned for DOST but my pictures stayed up
When I tried to appeal letting them know they might have made a mistake since my pictures were still up
They responded something similar to ~"We made a mistake. The picture was supposed to be deleted"
So I said okay and if I can get un-banned. They said no and kept me banned for months while all my pictures were still up
It is infuriating sometimes but.....
nothing you can do about it
No.110642
File: 1456257255913.jpg (Spoiler Image, 38.84 KB, 700x476, 25:17, 51b50104afa96f6fc10000bd-5….jpg)
>>110524
Yeah there are dost violations all over this place. Girls with their asses directly in your face, spead eagle and smiling, sucking on sex toys, masturbating and simulating sex noises. All of it being a clear display of sexual coyness, and definitely with the intent to illicit a sexual reponse from the viewer. But meh, nobody cares . . .
But if I post one, smiling little nude girl, in the most natural of poses, no coyness or overt sexualization,
EVERYBODY LOSES THEIR FUCKING MINDS
No.110646
>>110642
That's typical idiocy ruining something that doesn't cross the line.
No.110669
>>110667
Do you have a source or set name?
No.110684
No.110690
>>108831
would kill for this set
No.110693
No.110703
>>110382
>>110389
>>110396
>>110398
>>110484
>>110485
>>110486
>>110487
thank you for these! i got everything . . . she is a very nice smiling young girl!
No.110718
>>110703
great, and her vertical smile is also very nice.
No.110721
Hey mods, I'm not 110716 but I'm interested to know if it was the link (probably to the set), which I've concealed in the screen capture, or the cute image that doomed the post ?
I'd like to think it was the link, 'cos while they are obviously nude they're showing nothing while other NN pics in this & other threads show a shitload more.
No.110722
>>110721
she was singing a copyrighted song without license
No.110723
>>110721
wasn't it a spam link?
No.110724
>>110723
I entered that link into longurl.org and it actually goes to the Dolce Duo2 site.
Why hide a link to an NN set and post an image from a nude set ?
No.110726
File: 1456340430714.jpg (165.55 KB, 864x1152, 3:4, tmp_17650-(( so_w4f10h7yrl….JPG)
>>110721
Wtf did you do to my post? There wasn't a link in the photos I posted.
There's always one person who screws up everything for everyone!
No.110727
>>110724
Why can't users use links that look a little less suspicious?
No.110728
No.110730
>>110728
>>110727
Show me how You would post a link. There isn't a link in any of the Marina's photo's I posted earlier.
No.110732
>>110726
>>110730
WTF are you going on about? I was asking about the post AFTER yours. Try reading and understanding what is written by others, assuming you're capable of doing so.
The removal of your nude BD images (see screen capture) has more to do with their content than my question about a different post.
No.110742
>>110733
wow . . . thank you
No.110748
File: 1456347044481.png (277.22 KB, 720x1280, 9:16, tmp_23420-Screenshot_2016-….png)
>>110732
When you were whining & brown-nosing to the mods about a link in that post you lumped my post in with it.
My post was part of this set
>>108788
And showed the same level of nudity as these:
>>109145
>>108221
>>110078
No.110765
>>110748
where is that ls magazine issue?
No.110768
i have lost buckets to this girl . . . hope u guys enjoy
;)
No.110779
What's a good torrent search phrase for BD sets?
The BD- does not seem to pull anything up.
No.110801
wow these girls are beautiful
Even better than LS
No.110810
>>110801
whoa whoa whoa there buddy, let's not get carried away now . . .
No.110833
moar please
I love your pictures
these young ladies look so beautiful
No.110838
>>110779
There is no "good" torrent search phrase for BD sets.
If you do torrent you will get vanned. Its really as simple as you have an ip torrent address and you both download and upload bits of data from the torrent. Therefore you would be seen by LEA/judge as a distributor.
No.110847
>>110810
He's right, I think that BD in general had more of the prettier girls but LS had the sexier outfits and raunchier poses. Both sites had their merits.
No.110878
No LS girl was quite up to the standard of Marina/Tanya (whose real name was Lyudmila according to a Russian site that may or may not have been right!), but then no other BD girl quite reached her level of stunning perfection either, though there was some strong competition.
No.110889
>>108676
>I run Freenet inside of a Lubuntu (14.04) virtual machine using VMware
ah sure, you can run tails linux inside a VM when host is botnetOS, whats the point?
u must connect to freenet/tor whatever from a booted safe OS, either from ROM media
or as i have read about, u can can boot to an encrypted partition, i think truecrypt manual that mentioned something like this
No.110892
No more deletes. Nude modeling is art as long as it doesnt focus on genitals.
Young girl laying with her legs spread and a dildo in her hand = cp
Young girl topless = art
No.110893
>>108653
Link to post with Dasha's autobiography?
No.110894
>>108741
Any way that could be posted?
No.110906
>>110892
I agree. I would even go so far as to say that light/softcore cp should be legal. Girls are already producing it themselves with their phones/devices, why not let them show us their cute little pussies in a more controlled studio environment?
But alas, we have a long way to go before that would be possible.
As a side note, I've been seeing the typical 'loosening of the reigns' that happens in this area everytime the amerifags transition between presidents. In about a year or so, expect the hammer to drop.
No.110907
Alenka
Moar
All these models are simply way too beautiful.
Thank you for all the excellent photos for us to view
No.110913
>>110893
Sorry, it was posted in 8chan a few months ago, possibly here on hebe, maybe if hebe has archives you can access ? - speaking of Dasha :
http://zbporn.com/search/?q=dasha
scroll down to 7
No.110923
>>108662
So how do you find pages on free net? You mentioned this page, LS finder, do I just google it? I know that's a stupid question but I mean how am I supposed to find the page?
No.110934
>>110913
Damn, that's a nice find. Did you just stumble across that?
No.110943
>>110923
Just so you know..., I'm this guy:
>>108662
(And the rest of the 'Freenet' tirades.)
So to answer your question....,
First..., NO Google. Technically it's impossible to access anything on the open internet
'through' (that is, actually using) Freenet. In order to simultaneously use the public internet
while you are running Freenet you would have to open a new browser seperately.
Freenet 'URL's' (which are actually called 'Keys') don't even vaguely resemble regular web addresses. They look like this:
SSK@BqFKOoClgHHeyvkvwMR1JBHf-5dd~Yc~leT-GlbZYoI,qS7GvsnsKaXEjLQGxxX5X~GuoRGK4LMg6Ft~IyMvwA4,AAIC--8/-21/site.html
(Weird, huh?)
So..., to actually give you some useful information..., when you first open Freenet you are presented with, what looks like, a webpage
that is locally encrypted within Freenet on your system. It contains some initial useful links to get you started. Among them is one called 'Linkageddon'.
Think of 'Linkageddon' as being very roughly equivalent to the 'Hidden Wiki' on TOR...., except that unlike the 'Hidden Wiki', it is updated sometimes multiple times per day
and it DOESN'T VANISH every other day for an indeterminate period of time like TOR addresses always do.
'Linkageddon' is not censored, gives a brief description of the 'Freesite' and usually contains a friendly 'heads-up' if a site may
contain UA/questionable content as a courtesy to those who might be offended.
The other useful information for afficianados of /cutegirls/. /hebe/, etc., is that there is an additional application that works with 'Freenet'
that is called 'Frost'.
'Frost' is a message board app that works pretty much exactly like a Usenet News Reader..., except that instead of 'newsgroups' they are called 'boards'.
A good jump-off point for anyone who hangs-out on /cutegirls/ would be to add the boards called 'hussy' and 'child models - girls'.
Then just leave it running overnight while it downloads months worth of old messages in the background.
Look...., I am obviously a 'Freenet' fanboy as you can tell from all of my previous posts.
All I can say is give it a try..., if you hate it then uninstall it.
You really don't have anything to lose.
https://freenetproject.org/
No.110961
>>110943
Thank you for the great info. I dabbled around with free net, & I installed frost that I could never get it to work. I saw all of the boards which I added, but nothing ever came up, I never found any messages or anything. Is there any special settings you have to configure?
No.110967
>>110907
same girl, but she's slightly older and goes by a different name
No.110970
even moarz
keep the change, ya filthy animals
No.110971
>>110934
Found it over on her thread in /cutegirls/. Too bad there's no way to dowmload it, It's a rare find .
No.110988
So... Some kind so will do the favor of uploading the sets?
>>108658
Specially Marina.
No.111284
Same girl as:-
>>110963 and
>>111241
Here called Lena
No.111285
Same girl as:-
>>110963 and
>>111241
Here also called Lena
No.111286
Same girl as:-
>>110963 and
>>111241
Here called Marya
No.111287
Same girl as:-
>>110963 and
>>111241
Here called Marishka
No.111291
>>111265
>>111284
>>111285
>>111286
>>111287
i will try to post all of these when i get home, unless someone else beats me to it
No.111307
>>110770
more of this girl
No.111320
>>110782
That looks like a video pic!!!
No.111324
>>108646
hooked up with freenet, done a search for Sandra Orlow and got nothing in return, whats up with that??
No.111325
>>111320
You could be onto something there Anon.
No.111332
Not Marina's best set, I don't like the way they frizzed up her lovely hair and the makeup is not so good as her other sets, but it's still her and she's still lovely.
No.111334
>>111324
If you are searching Freenet like it's fucking Bing or Yahoo you are doing it wrong.
Follow the instructions here:
>>110943
and exercise a tiny bit of patience.
>Lurk moar.
No.111339
is frost not developed anymore?
http://jtcfrost.sourceforge.net/
> Latest news
> 2011.03.05
is there maybe a newer version on the freesite frost page?
No.111343
>>111325
>>111337
can anyone post these with OS?
No.111351
>>111339
You are correct that Frost has not been updated in quite a while...,
however...,
it is still very much in use and stable/dependable/secure.
Part of the reason for that is because Frost, for lack of a better description, is really only a GUI
to 'suck' a specific type of data from Freenet through you local machine/node (127.0.0.1).
That is to say..., Frost does not actually 'connect' directly with the wider Freenet network..., it only connects to your own local computer.
No.111353
>>111351
>>111324
(Same guy here.)
Oh and, by the way..., once you start Freenet & connect to 'Linkageddon', scroll-down until
you find an entry for 'Hussy Activelinks'.
Best place to start.
No.111355
>>111307
gawd . . . absolute maximum cutness
No.111356
Hey everyone, I just wanted to say thank you for this whole thread. Everyone has been doing such a great job sharing all these wonderful girls.
I've really added to my BD collection, it has been very neglected over the years, mainly due to the original file names and massive confusion due to duplicate sets being released over multiple sites. It seems, though, that some very fastidious collectors have developed unique naming conventions to finally solve the file-name conflicts.
Anywho, keep up the great work!
No.111360
>>111355
>>111356
Damn, Vera is fucking gorgeous. BD had the best girls ...
No.111362
>>111360
They had good girls yes, I think their photographers were what really shine. If you get a chance to watch those behind-the-scenes vids, you can really see that there is a level of professionalism similar to commercial photo shoots. The guys shooting were great with directing the girls from behind the camera, and they used very pleasing lighting ratios.
No.111363
>>>111356
I'm one of those whom has renamed most of my BD collection. It makes much more sense to me to have the set & series names included in the file name, that way it's possible to tell the difference when multiple sets were taken from the same photo shoot.
I see the discerning gentleman whom posted the above Vera, Marya, Marishka & Lena images has partially adopted the same method, but those filenames still fall a little short for easy identification. However they are a big improvement on the original "000-001.jpg" format.
My file name example attached.
No.111365
>>111363
I truncated my file names, because we are using the file names for another purpose in this thread . . .
but yes, you have the standard file name there, which give us the site name, set number, model index, and photo number.
No.111376
>>111356
my oc photo got deleted . . .
i am sad :(
No.111377
>>111376
i guess >>110642 applies
>>110423
>>110441
>>111129
>>101443
>>101528
>>101845
>>102239
>>107038
>>109497
>>105265
>>105270
>>105759
>>103139
>>103411
this
>>104579
>>109229
she's horny and wants cock . . . i guess that's ok and NOT, NOT i repeat, a dost violation
>>105348
>>106137
>>107349
>>107602
>>107607 in this vid, these two get cummed on by a guy, i guess that's ok, right?
>>107687 my favorite. a girl can blatantly suck on a sex toy, but not be nude, and absurd contradiction
No.111417
>>111363
Sometimes even the numbering doesn't sort out the confusion. Just as one example, officially set Ulia12.04 of Photo Angels with 139 images has the BD-Company.com.net logo, but there is another version of the set with the BD-Team logo of apparently the same series and name. This version has fewer images but some of them are different; if you combine them together you get a mixed set of 151 unique images but they will have to be renumbered to fit them in. The image posted here is an example of this latter set, so if you have the ordinary set this pic (and others) will be missing. All very confusing and there are several other examples like this not accounted for by the various indexes. Different logos often mean a different selection of images for the set.
No.111424
>>111417
That was what drove me crazy. I can handle the file names, but the fact that different sites were publishing slightly different photos in the same set was extremely confusing and annoying. I would go through sets, pick out photos that I liked, but then later on, see a crazy hot pic from the same set that I didn't have. Did I miss something or was my download incomplete? Is there more to this set? which set is the most complete? lol, are we finally gonna see something more than nude modeling?
No.111488
>>109146
>>109148
>>109150
I looked on the freenet site where the other BD sets are, both girls are individually on it (Alisha? and Janna) but I couldnt find these particular sets anywhere
No.111527
>>111488
They ain't BD sets, that's why you can't find 'em.
No.111605
>>111285
Do you have this set?
No.111607
>>111363
Do you have this set???
No.111663
>>111605
please see the first image here >>111341
and for this >>111607 please see first image here >>111346
No.111719
>>111663
O.K., I've seen those images - so how does that help?
No.111724
>>111721
Luda (aka Irene) is in the black lingerie and I believe it's Margo in the red.
No.111725
No.111726
No.111742
>>111526
moar of these two hotties . . . mah dick is diamonds . . . fuck
No.111750
Hey experienced and respectable old fags, young shit here...
I want to find more of Oksana and Alenska/Tonya
as well as few other sets like
>>110733
These girls are probably happy mothers by now, and have children that are as old as I am... so I feel absurd to not be able to look at them;
Are the meager detail and tag on the image file name enough for me to find it via freenet and indexers therein?
Are there little tag/keywords that will enable me to find these quickly?
Also to the freenet guy, are you also the alliterative loving, stenography app poster that has been posting here and MChan?
Someone should archive this beautiful thread, just sayin'
No.111763
>>111750
As an old fag to a new fag, I will say this: reading is your friend. Learn to read. Read this whole thread. Start at the beginning, and read each post, and follow any/all links.
When you are done reading the WHOLE thread, use the following clue: pay close attention to any post with ## in the original file name. Think about what a poster could use to give you a 'key' to their post, and use that to try and determine any patterns or words that might be of use.
If you do your research, this will give you quality content, without needing to access freenet.
No.111765
>>111763
and by 'links' I would add that you need to pay attention to who responded to posts, and what posts are quoted.
as an example, look at >>111663
that post is responding to what post? and what's the answer to the question raised?
No.111786
>>111749
Name of model?
>>111750
>>111763
I think I rather just dig around Tor/Freenet instead of playing ciphercodes, I have took the time to read everything... but I simply do not have the time to balance cipher sadly - and the whole stenography game business looks awfully suspicious security-wise
Its all werk werk and eat sleep for me,
two days a weeks free but even then work bugs me on the weekends
No.111798
>>111749
>>111748
Do you have this set?
No.111900
>>111869
So shes called beatriche in this set?
No.111942
>>111900
it would appear so
No.111950
>>111869
Don't appear to have this pic on the set
No.111976
Can someone post some more pics of the girl with a thousand names... Thank you!
No.111982
Is it true that BD and LS is considered "problematic" because the models poses nude and they are mainstream?
Or is it because of something else entirely?
No.112003
>>111950
There are two versions of this set, one in Photo Angels series with 164 pics and one in Sisters series with 159 pics. So they have a different selection of pics. Confusingly the logos are the same for both sets.
It's a similar thing with Marishka featured in >>11350 which is the bd-PhL_marishka29.03 version with 129 pics, while the version featured in >>111287 is the bd-phlo_marishka29.03 version with 170 pics, so this has 41 more images than the other set. You can tell the difference because of the logo.
Marina featured at >>110766 has two entirely different versions both with entirely different pics from the same set, so if you combine them you get 285 unique images.
Similarly with Marya at >>111346 there are two versions one with a few extra pic more than the other.
This is why BD is a nightmare to collectors.
No.112077
>>112003
So do all sets start off soft and have hard core pics at the end?
No.112124
>>112077
If by hardcore you mean cocks and actual penetration, the only BD site that did that was Photosvirgins and that was a site for older girls though they did slip in a few sets of their younger models if they looked a bit older than they were, but they didn't do the HC.
No.112135
>>112124
No I meant as in naked and leaving nothing to the imagination, Im not realy sure how to word it on this board, im trying to figure out why no one is posting sets here, im assuming they ( the sets ) get colourfull towards the end and thus are not permitted here.
No.112144
>>112135
BD and LS were once the same company, based in Kiev. Actually started as Ukranian Angels and a bunch of other "Ukranian" this or that. The two main guys parted company and one decided to do more photography focusing on the models, and the other wanted to do more photography focused on elaborate sets and costumes. Both sites produced thousands of pictures that would be quite acceptable here. Both also produced thousands of pictures that are unacceptable anywhere (by law). Just post stuff that isn't pornographic and it will be fine. None of the LS shit where Kristina is spreading her gash open or naked girls have their knees around their ears, none of the BD shit where Marina is fingerbanging her box. Just don't show nudity unless it is a completely neutral picture where the chick is walking, swimming, bathing, taking a dump...whatever. Some of the prettiest girls and best photography are from those sites- but also some of the most dangerous stuff too.
No.112157
>>112124
ideal marriage age in pic-related tbh
No.112177
>>112003
you can always mix both versions, sort them by exif date (i.e. using irfanview), delete the duplicates, and rename them, if you're into that.
No.112221
No.112285
>>112144
It seems that the BD and LS sites can not be found using Mozilla Fire Fox or Google. So can they be found using Tor or Linux? I read so much about those sites but mostly it is babble from egocentric geeks. What would like to know is can you access foreign sites using Tor or Linux?
No.112351
>>112285
The BD & LS sites themselves are long dead. There are however places on the darknet (yes, you need TOR) where those sets are often posted by those whom still have them, and long may those sites/posters live.
No.112356
>>112221
>>112285
>>112351
This is the Cinderella castle of Magic Kingdom park, where little children's dreams come true,
Find your way to the hidden online equivalent, and your dreams may come true too.
No.112405
>>108695
>USB would work in the described setup but eSATA is a WAY faster (6 Gb/sec.) than USB.
Even USB 3.0?
Also how do I connect eSATA to a device that has no other outputs than a single USB 3.0?
No.112406
No.112409
>>112356
it's amazing how many people post (let alone lurk) in that place, or similars, in the past, despite all the barriers to find it.
you can only conclude that if softcore cp were legal, it would be a mainstream thing
No.112410
>>110878
So strange... her lower body is horizontal but her upper body is vertical. Is this the future of human evolution?
No.112411
>>111750
>Someone should archive this beautiful thread, just sayin'
https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://8ch.net/hebe/res/108203.html
You’re welcome.
Archiving bookmarklet for you:
>javascript:(function(){window.open('https://web.archive.org/save/'+location.href)})();
Title it “Web Archive save”.
Before doing it, ensure a thread (or other page) is not archived and up to date already:
>javascript:(function(){window.open('https://web.archive.org/web/2026/'+location.href)})();
Title it “Web Archive newest”.
To archive full-size images instead of thumbnails, at least one more step is necessary: click Expand all images in the archived thread. This is a very bandwidth-wasting step and it doesn’t expand WebMs. You must expand these manually.
No.112437
>>112411
Useful: if you don’t close the archived thread tab and leave it running as it is, Web Archive will continue to capture updates (expect large delay). It will often do so without thumbnails. I’m not sure about exact circumstances of missed thumbnails, but that’s infinitely better than a trimmed thread when you forget to do it manually.
No.112440
>>112410
She's very flexible and so obliging she'll bend over backwards to please - thus by applying Darwinian principles of evolution, namely that those characteristics beneficial to the organism's breeding prospects will be passed on to future generations and thereby enhanced, I'd say Marina's breeding prospects were very good indeed, so yes you're right, it is the future of human evolution!!!
No.112457
does anyone know her name?
No.112460
>>112457
Yes, it's Inna from Photo Lolitas
No.112548
I can't resist it, I need to post another Oksana pic - she's gorgeous.
No.112552
No.112677
>>112551
Yes, >>111976 Would be nice.
No.112680
Anyone know what happened to masterchan?
No.112718
>>112680
see the 'fappable' thread and scroll down toward the bottom, it's discussed in there
http://8ch.net/hebe/res/105865.html
No.112720
>>112144
Also after LS closed down, the photographers started a number of new studios these included PR Models, Petite Models, and more.
No.112721
>>108581
>>108542
LS got shut down by the Ukrainian authorities mostly because of pressure from the US and Britain (being that most of their customers were from there). The photogs got essentially a slap on the wrist and nothing actually happened to them.
No.112723
No.112727
>>112680
Masterchan is nice because they let you post nudity, but it has to meet the autistic admin's definition of "tasteful, non-CP" nudity which seems to be completely arbitrary. I've seen totally innocent candid beach photos get the axe.
No.112728
Mayala was the best LS model bar none.
This is incontrovertible and cannot be disputed.
No.112729
And even among LS girls, the level that they were willing to go varied considerably. I know some of them did not do crotch shots at all, some were topless only, and some would do crotch, but not spread legs or closeup.
No.112747
>>112144
They probably use LS images in medical textbooks. Certainly they had some of the best gynecological exam images I've ever seen.
No.112749
>>111362
Yes it was definitely a high budget, professional operation and not some cruddy photos taken in a commieblock apartment in Kiev where they raped the girls shortly after the photo session. Considering LS was operating during Bush's first term, the resolution and photo quality was top of the line and way above the usual standards for back when then they typically had 600x600 images of around 100-300k size.
No.112758
>>112757
Please fuck this shit off.
No.112770
No.112895
>>112551
Oksana and Alenska please
and also
>>110733 would be nice
I got a bad feeling that both MK and freenet are both honeypot by now, it just ring like all the busts that have been happening;
>>112411
No idea what that Javascript console input means? How do I even open a windows/command to write that in on the site? Do I need some dedicated browser or program to do that?
No.113122
No.113151
>>108458
download snipping tool for windows
No.113387
nice cipher assholes
name is alena
this thead should plunge you into the hell with the rest of us
but thanks assholes
No.113388
fuck you guys you're all LEAs
No.113848
>>110733
>>108831
Clue please cannot find it
No.114346
Anyone know the name of this model?
No.114360
>>108628
How does one get to the "Hussy" board through freenet?
Explain the process to a complete noob here pls...
No.114372
I assume you have Freenet installed.
Click on the tab just to the lower right of the rabbit logo "Browsing" Then click on "Linkageddon", the second option in "Directories of websites on Freenet"
When Linkageddon has loaded find "Hussy Activelink Index in the right hand column, 13 lines down
No.114439
>>114372
fark i took the other direction and went to MK instead
asked a few nice gentoomangs but i can't find the (>>108831) lolitafix set no matter what
No.114485
>>114439
That set was posted 3 weeks ago, and access was given both on /hebe/ and /mir/. I just checked and it's still available.
If you need a hint, take a gander at this thread - https://8ch.net/cutegirls/res/18061.html#18116
No.114536
>>114372
Thanks man. As usual with anything technology-related with me, I did everything right but then assumed I did everything wrong when I didn't instantly see the board.
Thanks again
No.114748
>>114485
I has no Windows or Android phone
What now
No.116147
BD has a wide age range, at least half of the gilrs are uggo too.
No.116190
>>114485
I've seen that thread, but I'm still not sure what's supposed to do. You get a stegonography app and load the image in it? The image contains some sort of Link I assume?
No.116230
>>112144
Any more of this series?
No.116238
>>112124
Does anyone have this set?
(Pic related)