No.65680
No.65682
No.65686
No.65687
From what i read it is a small videp clip that shows her naked hacked from her phone
Why is she taking nude video of herself at such young age? Why does nobody else question this? everyone is on her side for no reason
she is a little slut obviously.shia prolly hit it
For some reason i cant find vid though. supposedly was on YouTube then Instagram but i cant find it. fuck my old age cant keep up with whats trending and these nudes of all these young hoes
No.65689
>>65687
Its not that unusual for girls of that age to take a nude video. I once looked through the files on an 11year old girls laptop and she had a few nude videos of her dancing. Its what happens when parents don't know shit about technology. they're both sluts but what i am saying is that its not unusual by todays standards :(
No.65692
>>65689
No I meant why she gets off scot free taking nudes of herself on video. Nobody seems to feel to ask her (or any slut like her this day and age for that matter)
It wont happen but the way celebrities get off and dont get scolded for being bad examples and sluts like this pisses me off
I rather like this behavior just cant understand the need for these hoes to always be the "victim" in situations like this
I wish someone finds vids of her masturbating sooner rather than later. The flexible bitch spreadind and rubbin her puss while doing a scorpion would be nice
No.65694
>>65692
If this is all true, about Maddie Ziegler, could not she technically be charged with manufacturing child pornography? There is precedent for charging kids for this (e.g., sexting). For example:
> Two Illinois children charged with felonies for ‘sexting’
> BATAVIA, IL — Two middle-school students are facing felony child-pornography charges after they were discovered ‘sexting.’
> “Sexting” is defined the act of sending sexually explicit messages and/or photographs, primarily between mobile phones. Adults can share images of other adults without repercussion. However, possession of any explicit image of a minor is considered a crime — even if the images were shared voluntarily among other minors.
> http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/batavia-illinois-sexting/
No.65695
oie k riko, post that video I know you have it bros.
No.65698
This is crazy. Just imagine how many girls her age are going to "leak" videos of themselves naked.
>Prepare for hebe shitstorm of new material
>First Vine videos and now Maddy wannabes
No.65700
and yes! call her local police department and complain that she be charged with the manufacture of child pornography
No.65701
>>65698
Do you think Maddie's mom, Melissa, will shop the full version of the video around like Kris Jenner did with her daughter's (Kim Kardashian) sex video?
I am kind of half serious when I ask this. Melissa, at least from her public behavior, appears ready to do ANYTHING to get her daughter to the top (fame + money).
No.65702
>>65700
This could get interesting, legally. If there is a District Attorney with big enough balls (and hunger for political advancement) he could use the child porn laws to throw the book at Maddie Ziegler.
If you think a DA would never drop the weight of the legal system on a child, think again. They do it all the time. Look at the 2 girls charged in the Slendermen felony murder case. Those girls are 12 yrs old and the State wants them tried as adults (last I heard).
A souless, power-hungry DA could use this case to make an "example" of Maddie for the sake of the "public good". Why? The fastest way to advance one's career, in law or journalism, is to try to destroy someone famous. Maddie Ziegler is world wide famous.
This might turn into a landmark age of consent case. No one could seriously argue that a female who trains 40 hrs a week (at dance) and mingles with the world's top celebritites, is too immature. Her maturity (and work ethic) puts many so-called 'adults' to same.
No.65703
>>65701
Maybe, remember she allowed her daughter to appear in a sexually suggestive series of videoclips, wearing nothing more than a skin colored leotard. She's as naked as she can be without it being literal CP. I've seen Candydoll sets much more conservative than that
No.65704
>>65703
You know if these 2 pictures were in a magazine called, for example, "The Monthly Lolita", the police would shut it down for child erotica .
No.65705
The level of stupid in this thread has reached new highs, even for /hebe/. No wonder people say pedo's are wrong in the head, lol.
No.65706
>>65705
first i read your post and thought : whats your problem??
then i started reading the the hole thread
>facepalm.jpg
No.65707
>>65688
Who is this girl?
>>65689
Hope you fukken saved dat shit! I think this serves as a reminder to always carry some portable storage, M I RITE GUISE?
ANYWAY, where can this fly shit be found? Also, it isn't CP, you retards.
No.65714
>>65705
I don't know what your point is.
If these videos are legitimate, and they qualify as CP (a legal determination - again, there is precedent for prosecuting middle school age children for 'sexting'), then:
(1) She manufactured the videos (recorded them on her iPhone)
(2) She transmitted them (they were transferred from her iPhone to the iCloud server - where, apparently, they were 'hacked')
(3) She "distributed" them (presumably, other people, such as Kalani, et al, have permissions to view her pictures and videos)
Other than "stupid" and "wrong in the head" do you have anything substantive to add to the thread?
No.65716
>>65707
>Who is this girl?
I don't know. She looks like some random tween (she says she is 13 years old) giving her social commentary and legal analysis.
No.65717
>>65704
Yes, talking about hypocrite media. If its being made by some average joe, it's CP, if it's made by a big media company, is entertainment.
No.65720
>>65719
oh and of course i want all this shit to blow up in her face
take her down a peg or two. if she kills herself even better but i doubt it
too many faggots will be on her side and defend her just like everyone defended McKayla
No.65722
>>65714
You're a moron. The actual Fed law for the people who don'th have a clue.
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/110/2256
No.65723
>>65720
>oh and of course i want all this shit to blow up in her face
>
>take her down a peg or two. if she kills herself even better but i doubt it
>
>too many faggots will be on her side and defend her just like everyone defended McKayla
Annnnd, you're a psycho.
No.65724
>>65723
Wanting justice isnt a psycho
Tired of all these double standards celebrities grab out their ass when they fuck up
As numerous stories have shown if this was my daughter she would be charged with cp
More than likely what will happen is Maddie defenders will state she should not cover up her beautiful body or be ashamed and there will be a big talk about TopFreedom
Then little girls will post their buds in support on social media - to which adults will take it as an "oops" moment but liberal mothers will praise their daughters "courage"
Nobody will ever be charged with anything and Maddie will laugh all this off and take her celebrity status for granted just like Jylie Jenner and the world will be even more fucked
No.65725
>>65724
>Tired of all these double standards
What exactly is she guilty of? Of being hacked? Of being teenager? You don't know shit other than a video exists - that's it. This doesn't qualify as CP by Fed standards. However, whoever guessed her password and distributed is guilty of at least two Fed laws.
You're preoccupation with this is stupid. If anything, if you’re in to little girls you should be happy it’s out there. Geeze, there’s no satisfying some people.
No.65729
>>65719
Uh, if those two are the only ones there it's too blurry to even tell what's going on, actually it would be hard to find a video of her that doesn't show more
No.65730
>>65724
If she were my daughter I would be charged with rape >:3
No.65731
No.65732
>>65719
Was that the gist of it? Such a blurry and short video. Was expecting a bit more.
No.65734
>>65732
We can't know if there is another video of she giving head or something. It's like the alleged nude pics of Bailee Madison and Peyton List when the fappening happened
No.65735
and yes her mother is going to exploit this for her own personal gain and profit.
>thats what those dance moms do
No.65744
>>65702
>2015
>still not realising everything in America is fully operated by your Jewish overlords
Why do you think these dance mom shows exist and how the emergence of the Sia videos and all that stuff goes hand in hand?
They want to slowly condition the population to accepting hebe and pedo notions in their lives. All of this happens according to a bigger plan and we for once should be happy about it.
No.65746
>>65722
Thank you. I'm tired of these cucks who think tits = CP. We're talking about the law, not 8ch rules.
No.65747
>>65735
He has this zombified expression, looks like he was in an MK-ULTRA hole for 72 hours with a headset on being brainwashed to kill niggers.
No.65758
No.65759
No.65767
>>65758
I guess he is the next serial killer to be in the news.
No.65769
No.65770
File: 1438227691056.png (244.29 KB, 887x513, 887:513, Screenshot from 2015-07-29….png)
If you guise want a jej, check out #staystrongmaddie.
All the autist obsessed fans are white knighting against an imaginary foe supposedly shaming Maddie for this, they're even circulating a rumor that she is suicidal.
No.65771
>>65770
I'm only hating on Maddie because she sexually exploited herself, but I like her enough to hate her for her own good.
No.65774
>>65687
>Shia prolly hit it
Maddie is tiny; I doubt her pussy is ready for a man-sized cock, but they might have fooled around without sliding into home plate.
No.65782
>>65687
>>65774
>of course he hit it
IG @ maddiezieglervideo
No.65785
Omg so many faggots in this thread
i can believe most fags love child model in sexy pose now posing like autist condemning the sexy maddie teeenager stage.
Fuck you all.
No.65786
>>65785
People seem to lose their head over the most stupid things don't they?
No.65788
File: 1438229743382.jpg (70.38 KB, 1024x683, 1024:683, Orig.src_.Susanne.Posel_.D….jpg)
No.65789
>>65782
Some people are saying that Mackenzie leaked it, that it wasn't a hacker. I tend to agree with this theory.
Mackenzie is a tech-savvy little minx. I saw her post in a YouNow chat once with low viewers.
No.65790
>>65785
>i can believe most fags love child model in sexy pose now posing like autist condemning the sexy maddie teeenager stage.
It literally took me three tries to understand that
But yeah, I agree completely.
No.65791
>>65789
>yfw this is all Maddie's doing and she did it for publicity, playing pedos and the fandom like a fiddle
No.65792
>>65791
>pedos and the fandom
These two things aren't mutually exclusive.
No.65793
>>65775
>>65774
But he could still finger her. Also, she still could blow him and he still can insert his zombie cock in her ass.
>>65775
And she was like 14 or 15 when the fappening happened :3
No.65794
>>65789
Could it be that she's jealous? Mackenzie is not even near as famous as Maddie
No.65795
been lurking super hard since I found out about this, cannot locate the win
No.65796
>>65794
Absolutely. Maddie is hotter, and a better dancer. No way there's not any jealousy there. It has probably been bubbling inside of Mackenzie for years.
No.65798
>>65795
You're not lurking very hard.
No.65799
>>65795
it's super blurry and it's less than a second, and it's just her buds, kind of dumb how it's called "nudes"
not even worth it, just looks up nudism and look at a girl maddie's age, same breasts
I don't know if there's a less blurry of what I've seen, but you can't even see her nipples
No.65800
>>65798 YES
>>65799 Dang that sucks oh well
No.65801
>>65800
How many sites have you checked by the way? It's a pretty easier find
No.65804
>>65802
This has more nudity and she's dressed
No.65805
>>65688
>open video
>instant voicecrack
Nice
No.65809
>>65790
sorry, not english speaker here.
No.65810
>>65722
"graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition" leaves a huge amount of interpretation room so isn't that far from from a legal definition that if a big media company approves it it's entertainment and if some random Joe does it it's CP.
Especially when the media company can make a US Attorney spend months arguing a case, but threatening to send CPS after the random Joe's kids means he'll almost certainly plea in exchange for not prosecuting the mother who can keep custody.
No.65817
>>65810
>lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
No.65828
>>65688
>reported them
FACK UUUUUUUUUU
No.65849
someone be the hero and just post already.
No.65851
>>65694
I think there has to be intent to share it for it, like in the sexting case
No.65866
>>65809
Oh, I apologizes. I can't speak any other languages.
No.65880
>>65692
this is the problem with pedos, you literally don't understand child minds are different than adult minds
No.65892
>>65851
>I think there has to be intent to share it for it, like in the sexting case
To qualify as CP in Fed law it must be "sexually explicit conduct". Nudity in of itself means nothing. A jury must decide if the person taking the picture/video intended for it to be used in a sexual manner. If it was just nudity then grandparents and parents would be going to jail all over. There have been some extreme cases, but those are very rare and almost always get toss out of court if they are appealed.
The real problem is the above poster is a moron with an agenda. He thinks it's a double standard because he want's to send pictures over the interwebs of nude babies to bate over.
>>65880
>this is the problem with pedos, you literally don't understand child minds are different than adult minds
People tend to want to rationalize their bad behavior any way they can. They blame their victims for being provocative, or sexy, or just 'wanting it'. He genuinely believes Maddie is consciously doing all these things to provoke others and not simply to have fun. If she dances sexily, he think she must understand what she is doing to "him" by doing so. He also fails to understand females. He thinks if they act sexy is the same thing as wanting sex.
It also probably doesn't help that he is a moron.
No.65896
>>65892
>Believing that behaving sexually is sign of sexual interest is distorted thinking.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
No.65899
>>65896
The actual quote is
>He thinks if they act sexy is the same thing as wanting sex.
>Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
A lot of rapists think like you.
No.65901
>>65899
you know alot of rapists?
No.65903
>>65901
A couple, but they're in prison. I had to study them however, and that is the kind of thinking many of them had. They typically either don't care or do not understand the difference between sexuality and sex.
No.65904
Discussion aside, can someone post the video link?
No.65935
>>65892
The U.S. Department of Justice, who prosecutes cases at the Federal level, interprets the law differently:
> Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.
> http://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography
I would recommend, to those interested in the legalities of this subject, to explore that entire section of the DOJ website. It is very enlightening on how the Feds, on the prosecution side, think. Unfortunately, many people forget the U.S. operates under a trinary power sharing structure. While the legislature writes the law one way, the law enforcement arm has their own discretion of when to indict, and the courts have their own interpretations when adjudicating.
Finally, the above only pertains to Federal law. The States can also prosecute. I think only 3 states share the Federal definition of obscenity. For the remaining states, mere nudity is grounds for an obscenity prosecution.
Off my soap box...
No.65936
>>65935
The key paragraph, I forgot above:
> Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.
So, the question is, is a video of a girl flashing the camera, multiple times, sufficiently sexually suggestive?
No.65940
>>65936
Can we please just post the vid link of MZ? I got this screen cap from 4chan, never seen the actual *uncensored, unwatermarked* vid though.
I need it for scientific purposes and because I fucking want her
No.65941
>>65940
Forgot pic. Maddi drives me fucking crazy
No.65942
No.65944
>>65936
>So, the question is, is a video of a girl flashing the camera, multiple times, sufficiently sexually suggestive?
Ask yourself this question - will any DA (no clue where she lives) or government agency try to indite a little girl who has had her account hacked and her images spread across the internet? The answer is, no. This has happened before and no agency has tried. It would be stupid to try. It would ignorant to believe a little girl dancing in her private bathroom, singing and dancing, would constitute explicit sexual anything. The only people trying to associate it with CP are the ones that are pissed that they cannot distribute images of nude children. Just drop it and get on with your life.
No.65948
>>65944
OK. Fair point. You are likely correct,no DA will prosecute her as a pizza manufacturer.
But, if it is not obscene, is it okay to post it on the net?
Or is this a gray area? It is obscene, but they will not go after her. But, they will go after adults who post it?
No.65950
>>65948
if your trying to figure out what the criminal justice system will do and not do, stop right now or you'll give your self an aneurism. The system is too fucked up.
No.65951
No.65959
>>65936
>So, the question is, is a video of a girl flashing the camera, multiple times, sufficiently sexually suggestive?
Display of breasts alone is not considered CP, only a lascivious exhibition specifically of the genitals or pubic area. Read the actual code here >>65722
Further, when it comes to barely budding tweens it's a stretch to say they even have breasts. In most public beaches it's legal for lgs to go topless for that reason.
No.65965
>>65959
Yes, agreed that is the U.S. Code. But, the U.S. Department of Justice has their own standard and interpretation, as stated here:
http://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography
http://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-obscenity
It is anyone's guess how the Federal courts would adjudicate this. As seen in the recent ACA ruling by the SCOTUS, the courts can arbitrarily decide with the executive branch, despite what is plainly spelled out in the law.
No.65969
I heard images of a boy and girl kissing are legally considered CP cuz they're "suggestive".
Thankfully so many lolis are using their phones and laptops for naughty fun it's impossible for anyone to keep up or slow it down.
Nudity is harmless, but news laws may be used as an excuse to shut down the net or severely limit data usage. As usual all we can do is wait and see.
No.65993
>>65770
It's simply a matter of wanting there to be more Dance Moms episodes, and for Maddie to be in them. Also for as many girls as possible to imitate them.
Newfags always want to sacrifice long-term non nude content for a useless 5 seconds of tits. Pedophiles can't seem to understand the concept of delayed gratification.
It's bad enough people are talking about the girls on any of these sites, and even a useless "nude" video can have harmful consequences to the jailbait supply.
I suggest just getting rid of the thread.
No.66011
honestly don't even know where to start looking for this vid, any help is appreciated.
The one screen cap if it's real is covered with words so we can't even confirm. So far this is all just a big rumor. If anybody has an unobstructed screen cap or even better would be a webm please post thanks.
Also who doesn't want Maddie in a special way.
No.66025
Any updates into the leak?
No.66029
No.66034
What's so special about this girl?
I bet no one would be interested of her, if she was normal girl living in brazil and just had a few videos on youtube...
No.66046
>>65965
That little blurb on the DOJ site does not infer exposure of the breasts is CP.
Bottomline, a girl flashing her bare chest, when not accompanied by sexual activity, is not child pornography. Same with the buttocks.
Take the case of Rebel Shooter, Miss Alli photographer. The postal inspectors didn't care about his shipping photos of Miss Alli topless or in a thong. He only got in trouble for genitalia slips.
https://artcontroversies.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/rebel-shooters-nude-child-models/#comments
No.66061
>>66034
>What's so special about this girl?
Do you really have to ask?
No.66064
>>66034
You kind of answered your own question. Few would have been interested, for example, in actress Jennifer Lawrence's nudes, released during The Fappening, if she wasn't world famous.
Maddie Ziegler is world famous. In fact, her rise has been unbelievably meteoric.
> inb4 "How can she be world famous? I have never heard of Maddie Ziegler before"
No.66068
>>66046
>DOJ site does not infer
Why do people do this?
To infer is to TAKE information FROM words.
I was able to infer that you don't get that from the way you misused the word. Get it?
No.66069
>>66034
>What's so special about this girl?
WTF kind of stupid ass question is that?
To hebes, what could possibly be special about a cute pubescent dancer with a cute pubescent dancer's body who makes videos like she does? Hurr durr I don't know, what?
No.66073
>>66068
It's a correct usage, actually. Why are you derailing the thread?
No.66078
>>66034
If she was a normal girl living in Brazil, she would be a dirty Mexican that has too big of an ass and an overall gross shaped body.
If she was a normal girl living in Ukraine, then yes, people would likely be interested in her.
In Maddie's case though, nobody is actually interested in her, but the idea she represents.
No.66079
No.66083
>>65935
> For the remaining states, mere nudity is grounds for an obscenity prosecution.
Bullshit
No.66084
No.66085
>>66083
In a modelling context, it can be, unfortunately. In a candid/nudism context, it's not.
No.66087
Holy shit, can we get this girl's hot tits already?
No.66088
>>65935
>>65948
CP and obscenity are not interchangeable terms
No.66089
File: 1438397563458.png (363.79 KB, 577x420, 577:420, Screenshot from 2015-07-29….png)
No.66098
No.66099
>>66089
>Kike harder.
be less obvious about the fact that you're retarded
No.66100
Thats enough discussion about cp, nudism, or modelling, or whatever guys. The important thing is that we have known about Maddie that she is a little slut, and waiting to get "BANG"..lol.
I estimated almost millions of hebe guys already fap with her leaked video.
No.66101
>>66100
slut
slət/
nounderogatory
noun: slut; plural noun: sluts
1.
a woman who has many casual sexual partners.
synonyms: promiscuous woman, prostitute, whore; More
informalfloozy, tramp, hooker, hustler;
datedtart, scarlet woman, loose woman, hussy, trollop;
archaicharlot, strumpet, wanton
"she dressed like a slut and didn't act much better"
2.
dated
a woman with low standards of cleanliness.
____________
Anonymous 07/31/15 (Fri) 22:29:33 No.66100
mo·ron
ˈmôrˌän/
nouninformal
noun: moron; plural noun: morons
a stupid person.
_________
Even the brightest pedo's seem to be deficient.
No.66102
>>66099
Here is your reply.
No.66103
>>66101
Shut up and just keep faffinf...Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh..Maddieeeeeeeeeeeee...Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
No.66104
>>66100
>I estimated almost millions of hebe guys already fap with her leaked video.
To be honest, it's not even fappable, it's disappointing. Low-res and not even a second.
The only reason we're still talking about it is because of the sheer controversy, considering it's Maddie.
No.66105
>>66082
This would be my wallpaper if the dimensions were such.
No.66107
>>66104
So what if its Maddie? There are lot of lolis and preteen out there sexier and yummier than that big eye, rabbit teeth, flexible horny dancer.
No.66120
>>65703
HNNNNNG
Fuckin' goddamn it.
Wait...what were we talking about?
>tfw decided to check /hebe/
No.66137
>>65801
give me a clue at least pls
No.66155
>>66137
- Go to MZ's official instagram page
- Read the comments
- Every few hours someone posts the video
No.66165
>>66155
Different anon here, but what posts do they put the video on? There are tons of pics, and I obviously can't look through them all.
No.66171
>>65850
pig requiring sperm
No.66172
>>65794
a pig requiring sperm
No.66183
>>66165
Start with the latest two pics, on the MZ IG page. Though, the flood (e.g., Maddiesnudzzz) began in the comments section of her Vogue Italia picture.
No.66189
>>66183
>>66155
Thank you based anons!
No.66193
I give up, can't find this shit on her IG.
No.66196
>>66193
Surprised IG has not deleted this one. Maybe this is all overblown
@kenziezieglersfacts
No.66203
>>66183
>>66196
> private
> Surprised IG has not deleted this one.
Is it the video without something is showing?
No.66216
>>66189
whats her IG?
yes im retarded
No.66218
>>66216
See her Twitter page
No.66219
>>66196
I'm getting real fucking pissed off.
Where is it? I keep loading more and more comments and it's just hundreds of people saying OMG DID U SEE WHAT @kenziezieglersfacts POSTED??? But there are no actual posts by anyone named that.
No.66220
>>66219
all ive seen is the screencaps, cant find anything besides that either
No.66222
If she made a nude video, great.....but I've always thought that she was ugly. Paige was always hottest girl on Dance Moms.
No.66231
>>66219
You have to request access to the page, it is private. You need an IG account. Go to that page and request access.
You keep seeing that message repeated because the page owner wants people to viral advertise her page, on Maddie's board, so she will get subscribers.
No.66233
>>66231
BTW, those are girls posting the maddiesleakedvideo stuff. There are many girls who hate MZ. Probably envy.
No.66234
>>66203
No. It has the censored video and one cap.
If people want the uncensored anything the will probably have to go to the darknet. Download Freenet and Frost.
No.66250
No.66252
>>65688
>It's wrong to spread around naked pictures of someone, so I reported people posting this video
>I feel bad for her BUT Maddie made a huge mistake and we shouldn't be showing her a bunch of love and support
>She's not a good role model, and girls shouldn't admire her
>We shouldn't just ignore this and not talk about it, it's a chance to teach other young girls that this is wrong
Aww, I'm really glad to see some lolis still have some common sense. She seems very smart and fair, with good morals. I like her a lot!
No.66253
>>66250
That would help, just to see what all the fuss is about
No.66354
>>66353
You're missing the point. First, she never intended for it to leak and a bunch of old pervs to see her in her most private moments. Second, as a child she really has very little 'logic' working in her mind. Children her age seldom understand long term consequences and make far more mistakes than adults. Third, society isn't 'ashamed' of anything. The general consensus is that people with little to no moral fiber (aka you) will take advantage of people for their own pleasure and create web sites to share stolen, extorted, and exploitive images and videos to further their own physical pleasure (aka /hebe/) - further perpetuating the culture of sexual abuse, child porn, and other forms of exploitation.
tl;dr you’re a pedo moron only concerned with rubbing one out over a little girl who would probably think you are gross, old and ugly.
No.66356
>>66354
Get the fuck out, anti scum.
Maddie did nothing wrong and has nothing to be ashamed of.
There is no fucking "exploitation" happening here, it's just a girl's nearly flat chest. Big fucking deal.
Nobody should care about this. At all. It shouldn't be a hot topic of discussion in the slightest. If I were her, I'd publish this shit publicly, say, "Yeah, this is my body, what of it?" and be fucking done with it. This is all contrived bullshit!
No.66357
>>66354
Ah, "rape culture," the old standby when women want to hate on men but don't have anything of substance to stand on.
No.66359
>>65899
She wants sex, just not with any guy.
No.66360
>>66354
> culture of sexual abuse
> culture
Funny how 99.99% of the population abhor sexual abuse, but supposedly there's some some sort of "culture" of it
The term "culture" lost its meaning
No.66364
>>66356
>Maddie did nothing wrong
She put naked videos of herself on her phone, which is illegal in its own right, and also opens her up for exploitation by people like you.
>There is no fucking "exploitation" happening here
She got her stuff hacked, and now you're jacking off to things she probably didn't intend or desire you to jack off to. That fits the exact definition of exploitation.
>Nobody should care about this. At all. It shouldn't be a hot topic of discussion in the slightest.
Besides for the people jacking off to it, right? "no stop criticizing me masturbating to pictures hacked off a little girls phone!!"
> If I were her
You aren't her, and no one wants your hot opinion in the slightest.
No.66365
>>66364
> She put naked videos of herself on her phone, which is illegal in its own right
Go arrest her
> She got her stuff hacked, and now you're jacking off to things she probably didn't intend or desire you to jack off to. That fits the exact definition of exploitation.
There are people who jack off to her musical videos and I'm sure she didn't intended this
Are her parents criminals? They are exploiting her
No.66366
>>66356
>Maddie did nothing wrong and has nothing to be ashamed of.
Of course she didn't you fuck'en tard. The person that stole her videos did and then shared them is the criminal. You're just a leach.
>There is no fucking "exploitation" happening here, it's just a girl's nearly flat chest. Big fucking deal.
Damn, you're dull. Exploitative also refers to using people for one's own gain (or pleasure). It's exploitive to use someone’s images/videos, which were stolen, for gain, profit or pleasure. It's the very definition of exploitation you fucken moron. Did you even go to school?
>Nobody should care about this.
No one should care about the safety of vital information, privacy, and the exploitation of minors? I bet you'd be singing another toon if your address leaked m8. Damn, you just cannot see past your own nose, can you.
>>66357
>Ah, "rape culture," the old standby when women want to hate on men but don't have anything of substance to stand on.
Yeah, there aren't sites on the internet feeding off of Facebook, YouTube, YouNow, and hundreds of other sites trying to talk little girls into showing them their bodies. Nope. There aren't thousands of videos of child porn being sold in Asia right now. Red light districts across central/south america defiently aren't using teen girls. Nope. Africa doesn't have thousands of child rapes happening nearly daily. Sure, there's no child abuse culture at all. How many pedos were arrested in Europe and America last year alone? 100,000?
No.66368
>>66366
You're a moron if you don't know what the term 'culture' means.
> Yeah, there aren't sites on the internet feeding off of Facebook, YouTube, YouNow, and hundreds of other sites trying to talk little girls into showing them their bodies.
Made by individuals. Not a culture.
> There aren't thousands of videos of child porn being sold in Asia right now. Red light districts across central/south america defiently aren't using teen girls.
Illegal.
> Africa doesn't have thousands of child rapes happening nearly daily.
Everything happens in Africa.
> How many pedos were arrested in Europe and America last year alone? 100,000?
You can talk about perverted INDIVIDUALS, but there isn't a 'child abuse culture', at least on the west.
No.66369
>>66365
>Are her parents criminals? They are exploiting her
There is a debate for that, but there are also laws which say what they can and cannot make her do under child labor laws (as an actress and entertainer). Olympian candidates train harder and longer than Maddie. It is the price of excellence and it has a cost which fallows those who try. Exploiting her just for her sexuality, or lack there off, is an entirely different story. There is no upside in her case to being a pedo's target.
No.66370
>>66365
All of this crap about getting off to their non nude videos puts a target on the girls. I remember back in 2007 the antis were running an largely successful campaign to keep ALL girls under 13 off social media sites. And they couldn't show anything if they were older, it was like BlogTV at the end. Stuff kept getting plucked until the pedos realized that talking about the girls leads the antis to them. The ones that didn't, well, they just shut down their site and still blame me for the heroing to this day.
As much as everyone hates me, my legacy still remains that good girls with few views are seldom talked about. These days there's so much content that I can't find it profitable to chase down newfag sites or try to run anti-flagging activities. But we have a favorable situation where we never have to interact with the girls, all we have to do is use War Room to sort through the videos. Why then would you want to go back to 2007, when the only stuff out there came from dirty and risky "child model" sites?
No.66371
>>66368
>You're a moron if you don't know what the term 'culture' means.
A culture is a way of life of a group of people--the behaviors, beliefs, values, and symbols that they accept, generally without thinking about them, and that are passed along by communication and imitation from one generation to the next.
Soooo, yeah. Pedo's have a culture and it's being debated right now, on sites like these. You really need to go back to school or something.
No.66372
>>66369
> laws
So it's ok as long as there are laws? Then non-nude children models are ok.
> Olympian candidates train harder and longer than Maddie. It is the price of excellence and it has a cost which fallows those who try.
Yes, but they are adults.
Until of course you are talking about this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2182127/How-China-trains-children-win-gold--standing-girls-legs-young-boys-hang-bars.html
Looks like child abuse and explotation to me.
No.66373
>>66353
Lolis should be pure. It's disgusting freaks like you who are ruining society and making all little girls into whores.
No.66374
>>66371
Sure, pedos have a culture, despite the fact they are demonized, criminalized and therefore marginalized.
Also, your got the definition from a website.
No.66375
>>66373
A girl is a whore for showing her boobies for just a moment? Then everyone is a whore to you.
No.66376
>>66372
No, it doesn't make it OK. It just means there are rules and if the rules are broken someone can be held accountable and things can change. With CP there are no rules. Children die. They get raped. If there is no oversite and no one looking into things, ANYTHING can happen. THAT is the problem.
>Yes, but they are adults.
No. There is a minimum age, but kids start way younger. Kids don't just go to the gym and start on the floor and become Olympic ready. They start at five or six.
>Looks like child abuse and exploitation to me.
It does to a lot of people too, thus the reason they are trying to stop it.
I think you better head out dude. You're way out of your element in this discussion.
No.66377
>>66374
>Sure, pedos have a culture, despite the fact they are demonized, criminalized and therefore marginalized.
Sooo, I'm right and you're wrong. That's all you had to say. Not all that boo-hoo stuff at the end.
>Also, your got the definition from a website.
Annnd that's bad because? It's obvious you don't understand that it is common for people to cite their sources and try to be accurate in their claims. Otherwise, they just sound like they are pulling things out of their ass, like.... you. *sigh*
No.66379
>>66376
So you're in favor of regulating CP instead of just tossing it under the rug hopelessly hoping people won't produce it? Do you think what we do now as a society is adequate? How would you personally like things to change?
No.66381
> muh child explotation!
Let's be honest: her videos are blatant pedophilia already. And they aren't even subtle. People who defend the videos always come with the "b-but it's art" excuse. But the truth is that Hollywood is full of pedophiles.
I feel sorry for her and blame her parents for exposing her.
No.66382
>>66368
>You can talk about perverted INDIVIDUALS, but there isn't a 'child abuse culture', at least on the west.
A culture is comprised of its individuals you disingenuous shithead.
No.66383
>>66381
Wrong. It's precisely the lack of pedophilia that makes these videos come about. These girls are all in upper class shelters; they never get sexual attention from anyone. Girls only practice modesty to avoid such attention, and without it you see the natural state of the girls, of which Maddie's videos is representative.
No.66384
>>66381
Here's a question for you: How much of the 99% can afford to pay for their 5 year old daughter to go to ballet school 40 hours a week? Those girls all homeschool so they have more time for dance.
No.66387
>>66379
>So you're in favor of regulating CP instead of just tossing it under the rug hopelessly hoping people won't produce it? Do you think what we do now as a society is adequate? How would you personally like things to change?
*sigh* You're a moron.
No.66388
>>66381
The thoughts that adult women have - Do I look skanky in this dress? Can people see my nipples? That is a LEARNED behavior. This is why girls have to be kept away from the newfags and the antis. The best content is of rich sheltered girls who are already more attractive to begin with that have no concept of modesty. If there were no pedophilia then little girls would be dressed like that all the time during the summer, if they weren't just naked.
No.66390
>>66383
>which Maddie's videos is representative.
Leave the thinking to someone else m8. Her video was leaked by a hacker, not by her. Dancing around with a friend topless doesn't constitute sexual repression. It's a child having fun in the privacy of their own home. Only a truly bent mind could associate childish behavior as some kind of hidden desire to be fucked by adults. If she really wanted sex she could have it. Women are the limiter in sexual behavior and will get it if they want it. I just think you're pissed because girl's probably don't want anything to do with you so you have to conjure up this psycho theory of yours.
No.66392
>>66390
Please review the last three posts of mine and reformulate your statement.
No.66393
>>66388
>If there were no pedophilia then little girls would be dressed like that all the time during the summer, if they weren't just naked.
No, just no. This is the state of Western education?
No.66394
>>66393
Modesty is endlessly drilled into the girls. How many animals do you know of that wear clothes? It isn't natural at all.
No.66395
>>66393
Parents say the girl can't wear a crop top when she's 10, she's annoyed because all the cool kids are doing it. But does she know why not to wear it? If girls were not constantly hounded by sexual attention, would there be any reason not to? How much sexual attention do 10 year old girls receive when they have a totally obsessed mother that's around her 24/7?
No.66396
>>66381
>>66383
You're both full of shit. The video for "Elastic Heart" is about inner struggle within one's own self. That's straight from the source. The best information we have. If you want additional anecdotal evidence, watch some of Maddie's interviews. She's basically somewhat weirded out by Shia LaBeouf, because he's an extreme method actor.
No.66398
>>66387
>You're a moron
>*emote*
No.66400
>>66396
And what about all of her other videos? Why does she dress the way she does during dance practice and competitions? Why does she move the way she does?
No.66403
>>66401
Newfag: If you haven't noticed, I'm explaining here the chilling effect that sharing these videos has.
No.66408
>>66403
The jailbait supply > *
No.66412
just rapped a young woman how and just uploaded the video to youtube oops how do i delete it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfcGGnavzyQ
No.66419
>>65735
>two digital cameras
>didnt bring any to church
No.66460
>>66370
>But we have a favorable situation where we never have to interact with the girls, all we have to do is use War Room to sort through the videos.
Tell me more about his "war room" :3
No.66724
Do is the only source these instagram accounts? Because I still ain't find shit so far aside from the stills on here >>66019
No.66725
No.67158
>>66725
Bump.
I need that video. Someone link it pls.
No.67220
>>67158
Go to this site, got both the videos:
>>66019
No.67222
>>67220
Where within that thread?
No.67229
Only the third video got posted. The good ones are nowhere to be found.
No.67365
No.67369
the videos are on a master chan. the quality isn't very good. I was hoping to have HD come out.
there is a video of Maddie in a beige leotard from Dance Moms that shows more. it's on youtube.. Dance Moms Full Dance The Mannequin (S5, E11)
No.67370
>>67365
I've been looking :(
No.67371
No.67373
No.67390
>>67365
>>67370
>>67371
masterchan org/candy/thread/9710
and
neuschwabenland org/gm/res/252.html
>You're welcome
No.67392
>>67390
Neither link actually has the video btw.
No.67400
https://neuschwabenland.org/gm/res/252.html#723
This is the third video but it doesn't show much.
No.67477
This doesn't make any goddamn sense.
I thought there was supposed to be bottom stuff. but there's barely any topless stuff in this, you certainly can't even see anything
No.67558
>>67477
She has a bunch of cameltoe pics out there.
No.67560
Would love to have this pic in hires.
No.67628
I final found videos they are shit quality though
No.67629
No.67631
go to masterchan
candy/thread/9710
dl top 3 videos
No.67632
No.67633
>>67632
Seriously these videos are less than nothing. Quit wasting your time.
No.67636
No.67638
>>67636
>This one is uncensored.
What exactly was there to censor in the first place?
No.67641
I still want to see the video to this screencap.
No.67716
>>67641
the screencap is better than the video
No.67766
>>67560
Holy fuck sauce on that picture?
No.67772
>>67400
Oh my fucking God, that shit 404'd,what the fuck? Last night I had bad Internet and was beyond exhausted, and I thought, "I'll download these tits later. I'm sure they'll still be there. I can't get unlucky two times in a row for the same thing."
Never fall into that trap, guys, download the tits as soon as you see them.
Back to square one, and still only have the shitty red video that literally shows nothing.
No.67827
Oh come the fuck on! Where's the video that matches that screencap??
No.67829
>>67772
It is a bit odd though I wonder what happened
There were lots of tits posted on that board. So she shut down a whole goddamn board? Fucking hell
No.68348
Anyone find the clear video again yet?
No.68473
>>68348
Nothing has surfaced so far.
No.68644
>>67772
>>67829
That's so fucking weird that they'd just delete the entire board like that. Anyone speak much Germany? They might say why they did it on the front page or something
No.69049
File: 1439346349034.jpg (39.32 KB, 500x668, 125:167, tumblr_lx8sy9YqXP1r43mqxo1….jpg)
No.69242
Someone's got to have better vids
No.69266
No.69275
No.69300
>>69275
Hey, leave your mom out of this
No.70166
More vids have come out I have seen screencast but not full vid anyone else found yet?
No.70222
>>65687
>>Why is she taking nude video of herself at such young age?
Well, you see, after several years of what's called puberty, boys and girls have gone through some changes and have certain urges, usually toward each other. Ask your parents about it.
No.70512
>>66370
Please educate me about this war room
No.71274
New rules mean Maddie's tits can be posted. DO IT, FAGGOTS!!
No.71438
File: 1439982228541.jpg (77.95 KB, 537x720, 179:240, 25e84d0c0f349f416388c0db68….jpg)
No.71439
Want to cum in her cute, tight, little body.
No.74498
I thought you were asking if she's ever accidentally leaked... like leaked in her pants. Oh well.
No.74538
>>65692
taking nude pics of yourself is not a crime
No.74988
No.75023
He had a song? What was it called? Can you give me the link?
No.77507
No.77514
>What did she have leak?
My cum. Out of her mouth, cunt and asshole.
No.80690
No.90393
Is no one going to post the vids?
No.90490
I have the vid but sadly its the red edit and idk how to make it black?
No.90504
No.90508
>>90490
Which vid? Post it.
No.90638
This girl kind of creeps me out.
No.90672
>>90638
I know. It turns me on a bit
No.90694
does anyone actually have the vid?
No.90918
Does anyone at least HAVE the uncensored vids? Maybe they're just scared to post them? I dunno, guys, someone help me out here.
No.90920
what's with the mistache on her forehead?>>90905
No.90923
>>90902
I would like to cum in her mouth
No.90924
No.91046
bump so someone with the video can actually post the shit
No.91056
has anyone actually seen the "pics" that were leaked?
No.91073
>>91056
I saw two caps from non-fucked versions of the videos. One was censored by whatever dipshit posted it, and the other wasn't
No.91075
>>90923
I would like to watch you do that.
No.91389
>>91075
I would like to watch you watch him do that.
No.91392
>>91389
I'd watch you both while watching myself in the mirror.
No.91425
>>65770
He probably typed that with one hand with his Maddie porn open on the side.
>>65771
This is going to be Ally Magrum all over again.
>>65774
So she was ready for your cock long ago?
>>65777
Obvious secret relationship is obvious.
>>65793
Who is this? The post you replied to was removed or something.
>>65794
That ass is so ready for man-cock.
>>65850
What the fuck is she wearing, underpants? If she or her mom is putting panties videos on the internet they know EXACTLY what they're doing.
>>65880
Yup, that's 100% the only problem.
>>65935
Are you on the right website?
>>65940
Let's make this an official Maddie thread and dump all our pictures worth fapping to.
>>65993
You can't stop the supply, girls are getting sluttier and sluttier and getting exposed to the internet sooner and sooner.
>>66069
Her amazing amount of intelligence and sparkling personality!
>>66082
I like this one more for the theme than sexuality. It's all dark like she's preparing for a necromantic ritual. Nothing makes my bone rise more than necromantic rituals.
>>66087
This guy has his priorities straight.
>>66100
Not just hebe guys, many that aren't hebes but soon will be.
>>66171
You. I like you.
>>66183
So much fucking advertising, god damn she is being controlled.
>>66365
"people who jack off to her musical videos" People would jack off to a picture of her elbow, I'm sure of it.
>>67636
ALL OF THEM ARE 404ING!
>>69275
Hey dude, don't insult my slop porn.
>>74043
I may just be a faggot but I think this is the first good photo in this thread.
>>74589
Dude, obvious photoshop to make her look better and her mouth smaller.
>>74988
Thanks for being blunt.
>>90672
This fucking thread.
>>90920
Now this, I can fap to.
>>90923
You'll have to wait in line and it'll drip out cause her mouth so full.
FUCKING DAMN THIS THREAD TOOK FOREVER TO GET THROUGH!
No.91891
necrobump just in case someone wants to post the video
No.91913
File: 1447803054652.jpg (153.55 KB, 640x633, 640:633, tumblr_nc2vyi0wyA1sm2xi9o1….jpg)
No.91920
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
She's really cute in this video.
No.92489
No.93247
bubbling effect mackenzie
No.93317
Wanna fuck her tight pussy so much.
No.93343
>>93317
You realize every time some idiot says something like this the mods are drawn to the thread it's said in like a magnet. Then all the good stuff vsnishes.
Good job.
No.93628
K, this is driving me crazy. Ineed those videos, man. This is a "gotta catch them all" OCD situation here.
No.95413
>>93247
what a gr8 little body
No.95444
No.96386
No.96392
>>93247
Wanna slam my cock against her fucking throat
Give her a sore throat and call in sick to school for her
then continue fucking her all day while her parents think she is at school
Full proof plan
No.98426
No.112094
does anyone have the videos
No.114397
>>114392
Why even the legit one is shit. And only shows an undeveloped nipple.
No.114398
>>114397
You know that feeling when you find something that was hard to find and you just feels good man. I have seen uncensored photos already after I posted that and I see what people mean. It's not all that cool. For me it is the shock value of seeing her like that and finding that video.
No.114553
can you post a download link for these images
No.116254
>>65679
>What did she have leak?
That bottle whose lid wasn't on tightly.
No.116358
File: 1458636624848.jpg (230.24 KB, 1512x910, 108:65, Mddiende000100010@gmail.co….jpg)
