/hebe/ - Girls

>>92835

Think of it like this:

You just raided a neighbouring tribe, killed the men and now it's time to claim a wife to take back home.

You have two choices.

A 30yr old who's been through 4 pregnancies. Her tits have gone saggy, her stomach's covered in stretch marks and her cunt's wrecked after squeezing 4 babies through it. And she's a bit fat.

OR

A virgin 9yr old. Her body is young, slim, tight and fresh. No stretch marks, wrinkles or beef curtains.

I think any sane man would take the 9yr old. This decision would make sense since she would have more eggs in her ovaries for you to fertilise over the long term than the 30yr old whose ovaries would be half empty.

>>92835

>Was pedophilic attraction adaptive in caveman times?

Long story short, no. Based on studies of tribal and early agricultural societies in South America, Southern Africa, New Guinea, Australia etc. most of the evidence points to children being betrothed after six or seven (when their survival rate increased dramatically), sexual intercourse occurring around menarche after marriage, then their first child coming around 15-24 depending on region. Only a few societies ever encouraged sex between preteen's and adults and these relationships were not seen wholly as sexual (baby boys were masturbated by slave/servant women to calm them for instance). The most adaptive behavior is to reproduce as soon as possible because there was such a high rate of death in most prehistoric periods. If you horded a bunch of 8yr old's in South Africa for instance, due to their subsistence lifestyle, there is a high probability you would not survive long enough to mate. Also, with many of these hunter/gatherer societies where young girls marry older men (usually in their lower twenties), divorce is very common. Second marriages tend to be with men within four years of the girls and last much longer, if not for life.

The most successful peoples tended to guard their children, but let the children play sex games with each other, while keeping adult male/child female relationships to a minimum. Girl's were seen as a highly valuable and it is usually the domain of mothers, aunts, and grandmothers to forge these marriage ties with other families. For most of these societies, pedophiles were often seen as 'wrong' in the head or childish or not fully developed and were often shunned, not given full rights in their tribes/villages, or were simply cast out. Childhood is a thing most tribes did not tolerate after a certain hallmark moment (menarche, first hunt, ritual).

>>92891

So in other words, hebephilia was adaptive for the purpose of maximizing healthy offspring.

I wonder whether pedophilia may have originated to remove some small portion of the male population from the alpha dominance, "hunt for pussy" mentality and instead shift their time and attention to children. Watching out for them, spending time with them, acting very protective. Maybe even preparing them for full penetrative sex by teaching/training them. Doing so would potentially help increase survival rates to breeding age. I've heard homosexuality may be selected for similar reasons (minus the teaching part), so I imagine pedophilia could serve the same role.

At any rate, I call bs on the op..I'm pretty sure there's no store called sweet and sexy kids...that would be an open invetation...

>>92944

Like I said, there are a few cultures which tolerated this kind of behavior and even forced children into these kinds of relationships. Children, particularly female children, had little to no rights in these societies. The 10yo "consent" of Europe is a misnomer. Girl's didn't have rights, so saying the AoC was 10 is false. Parents were given the right to do so by the Church, but they had to follow certain rules. Sex was still considered wrong until menarche in these cases.

>>92976

>Like I said, there are a few cultures which tolerated this kind of behavior and even forced children into these kinds of relationships.

Oh, like the English?

Fuck off faggot.

I don't know about cavemen times, but it's already been known that the romans frequently had sex with children. Basically, if you were a child slave, then your captor could do anything they wanted to you without consequence.

Wealthy romans obviously had sex with young boys all the time. In fact it was seen as weird if you didn't do it.

I imagine cave men were too busy trying to stay alive to care about exclusively having sex with children. Would you really give a shit about kids if you weren't sure you were going to eat the next day or even be alive? probably not.

>>92990

>>92992

>>93007

Meh, believe whatever makes you feel better. I'm not the one [SPAMWORDFILTER25]ing in the shadows trying to validate my sexual urges.

>>93003

With teenagers, yes. Almost never with prepubescent children. Of course there were the exceptions, but they were rare. Men who tried to have sex with babies and toddlers (i.e. pedophiles) are hated by just about everyone, throughout history. Notice how none of the pedo's here can find any supporting evidence for their urges, yet they keep trying to defend them? People wonder why they don't get why you can't just tell a disturbed person they are disturbed. They just don't get it. I'd rather talk to a pedo that accepts his urges and is trying to deal with them than the people that actually think a baby "want's" it. That kind of mentality is that of the most evil people in history.

Teenage marriage was never all that common anyway. For example, Romeo & Juliet is a morality tale warning about the dangers of young love.

>>92836

A 9 year old is still completely prepubescent. It will be worthless from a reproductive standpoint for several years yet.

>>93075

>I'd rather talk to a pedo that accepts his urges and is trying to deal with them

But you can't deal with them anyway because of how completely that pedos are blacklisted by society. Most psychiatrists won't even work with them.

>>92976

>>92944

The best he can do apparently is cite primitive jungle ooga booga tribes. Why do civilized societies not allow this sort of thing?

>>92836

this tbh

>>92891

what a load of pseudo science bullshit, mixed with completely made up bullshit. 0/10 apply yourself.

btw. evolution isn't necesarely adaptive. neotenic taits are typical of human females, so human males are attracted to young females, even if there isn't any reproductive advantage.