[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/hebe/ - Girls

Read the board rules before posting.

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next update (Jan 4 2016)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


BOARD RULES - HEBE NEXT - CUTE GIRLS

File: 1450624451225.jpg (969.77 KB, 1800x1200, 3:2, 1450218127305.jpg)

 No.97864

Hey guys! Just a quick question. How is this stuff legal? I mean, it's super hot and all, I just don't want to spend time in prison over it. Actual case law surrounding NN models would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!

 No.97872

If you have any doubts just fuck off

Enjoy little girls without regret and you will live happy life

Rape one and live and even happier life


 No.97907

why would it be illegal?


 No.97968

>>97872

I thought raping stuff weren't allowed anymore ? Anyways, reported.

>>97864

To answer you, it stays legal if the picture isn't clearly showing some sexual parts of the girl. Actually I'm not a pro about what's legal or what's not, but I can tell you that you wouldn't be in any trouble with most NN models, or at least Candydoll ones


 No.98017

File: 1450671118883.jpg (1.73 MB, 1200x1800, 2:3, 1442333391609.jpg)

It's all NN for the most part.. everything's fine.


 No.98019

18 U.S. Code § 2256

(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—

(A)

the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;

(B)

such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or

(C)

such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.


 No.98020

(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) [1] of this section, “sexually explicit conduct” means—

(i)

graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited;

(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated;

(I)

bestiality;

(II)

masturbation; or

(III)

sadistic or masochistic abuse; or

(iii)

graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;


 No.98022

(10)

“graphic”, when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted; and

(11)

the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.


 No.98023

Public Law 114-38

114th Congress


 No.98251

File: 1450790174667.jpg (361.83 KB, 1280x1190, 128:119, n_s.jpg)

You could always use QuickJava and disable images. There's no reason you should be punished for what Other People do.

Using War Room you see interesting stuff all the time, using this image as an example.

2:46 presents a possible win, and upon further investigation that's not the case (so don't worry about this video)

The key issue here is the intent of the videos, and for Youtube it's clearly the case that the videos were -not- made for a sexual purpose.

Nevertheless interesting things do make it through and the secret is to look through lots of thumbnails, and from there all you need is a video player with A-B Repeat.


 No.98302

First Amendment > 18 U.S. Code § 2256

The First Amendment is absolute.


 No.98328

>>97872

>>97968

Why the fuck isn't >>97872 deleted. Potions, get off your fucking ass or hire someone who gives a shit.


 No.98334

>>97864

http://national.suntimes.com/national-world-news/7/72/1394679/tom-delay-bestiality-pedophilia-department-of-justice

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay says not only is all hell breaking loose after the Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage, but we’re on the fast track to legalizing “12 new perversions,” including pedophilia and bestiality.

He also pointed to a “secret memo” from the Department of Justice when Malzberg if the tax exempt status of religious institutions could be pulled if they teach against gay marriage.

“We’ve already found a secret memo coming out of the Justice Department,” DeLay said. “They’re now going to go after 12 new perversions, things like bestiality, polygamy, having sex with little boys and making that legal. Not only that, but they have a whole list of strategies to go after the churches, the pastors, and any businesses that tries to assert their religious liberty. This is coming and it’s coming like a tidal wave.”

When pressed on the “secret memo,” DeLay didn’t back down.

“That’s correct,” he said. “That’s correct. They’re coming down with 12 new perversions. LGBT is only the beginning. They are going to start expanding it to the other perversions.”


 No.98347

>>97872

Rape fag needs to be banned and removed.

>>98334

What was the purpose for this?


 No.98434

>>98334

Only Republicans think that religious freedom implies tax exempt status!


 No.98445

>>98251

WTF is War Room?


 No.98457

>>98334

About time too...


 No.102994

Recently heard that actually looking at and even saving cheese pizza isn't much of an issue, actually. It's when you start re-uploading that it becomes an issue.

Not entirely sure if that's true or not though.


 No.103186

>assert their religious liberty

>by enforcing sex laws on people

>not seeing the irony of calling it liberty


 No.103229

>>97968

>>98328

>>98347

>wanting people banned because they made a comment you didn't like

Save yourself the heartache and fuck off instead. Freedom of speech means you have no rights not to be offended.


 No.103231

>>97864

If you are worried, look up the governing laws in your nation in respect to pizza. What may apply to me may be entirely different where you are from.

>>98023

>>98302

This may sound strange to Americans but the billions of people who live outside of America are not subject to its legal system in this manner. It's really fucking obnoxious when a Burger cites American legislation when the person hasn't stated that they are in America. Your constitution is meaningless to the rest of the world and governments take action upon an individual based on their own legal system, regardless of where the servers are located.

Clapistani are an overall negative presence online.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]