[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ameta / choroy / d / dempart / general / jenny / miku / monarchy ]

/hgg/ - Hentai Games General

Board dedicated to some of the greatest games in the world
Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


|Rules|ContactUs|Writing Tutorial|Vidya Gaem Porn|Vidya Gaem Porn|Video Games|Actual Video Games|

File: a7fd4c03b3453a5⋯.jpg (131.71 KB, 657x986, 657:986, gk8ggvJMOS3m9wtiUBJTSMjj02….jpg)

 No.332871

>Rules:

https://8ch.net/hgg/rules.html

>Contact Info:

https://8ch.net/hgg/contact.html

>Board Logs:

https://sys.8ch.net/log.php?board=hgg

>Public Bans:

https://8ch.net/bans.html

>Board Settings:

https://8ch.net/settings.php?board=hgg

>Banners: (Feel free to submit more!)

https://8ch.net/hgg/banners.html

>File size must be lower than 500 KB and dimensions are 300x100 exactly.

>You may upload up to 300 custom banners per board.

>Allowed file formats are .jpg, .png, and .gif.

Only CodeMonkey (CM) can change these.

Feel free to discuss Meta stuff ITT.

If you have to privately contact the current BO: hggbo@airmail.cc

Or look at the contact us page for the emails of the vols.This thread may be periodically edited/updated.

Previous meta threads:

IV:https://archive.is/oaZ57

III: https://archive.fo/tms0p

II: https://archive.is/PYHXH

I: https://archive.is/eqWQU

FAQ

>Why isn't this thread stickied?

Because we assume you can use ctrl+f and locate it. Stickying would clutter the front page.

>Why was I banned? I didn't break any rules?

Please refer to the rules, or posts in the thread around the same time you were banned. Most of the vols will archive why they banned someone, sometimes they won't post the ban so as not to clutter the thread, sometimes they don't archive. They usually have a good reason for banning you and will respond if asked though.

>I shouldn't have been banned!

Report it to one of the vols. All of our emails are in the contact section. If the ban is less than 8 hours, you might not get a response. If you legit shouldn't have been banned, the issue will typically be quickly resolved.

>Why are some bans visible in the thread while some only appear in the logs?

Personal preference of the vol. Sometimes a public statement makes it clear that we're super serious or are just fucking around, but sometimes a quiet ban is preferable if it's irrelevant to the current discussion/thread.

>Some vols only give short five minute bans while others give 8+ hour bans!

Each vol has their own way of dealing with bannable offenses. Some of us take a laxer approach than others, such as editing posts and giving warning bans for first-time offenders, but that's not guaranteed and is a personal preference, not a requirement. Don't take it for granted. We all take a hardline stance on repeat offenders more or less. Just consider it the luck of the draw and a risk you're going to have to take if you violate the rules. It's not our fault if you didn't read the rules page linked on the front page.

Edit: To make it more clear, 8 hours is what the bans are generally supposed to be for first offenses.

>I'm not receiving a reply! My report is going unnoticed!

If you don't immediately receive a reply, its because we usually will let a few posts stack up before replying. We also work or go to school, so while some of us check the thread during the day, we might not be able to respond to something in a ten or thirty minute break unless it requires an immediate and brief response.

>Can I make a thread about X?

You can make a thread about anything really so long as it follows the OP quality rule. Threads that are completely unrelated to porn or are furry/NTR are likely to get the B&D treatment though.

>I'm an X, so why can't I namefag?

Read the rules.

>Why aren't old threads just left up?

Because it would clutter the board and kick dead but reviveable threads off the board entirely. An exception has been made to keep the previous thread up for a little while, but not forever.

>Why are some threads purged while other threads left up?

See:

<Dev interactivity and non-shitposting activity for the threads will be considered when deciding to delete it or not after the time period for 0.0001 alpha games (currently set to two weeks since the last post).

Some vols take a more liberal stance than others on this rule's application, but basically pump-and-dump threads will be deleted after two weeks while threads that had lots of activity or quality OPs will generally be left up after two weeks so as to allow further discussion down the line.

On 3/29: Furfags and Cuckshit have been given a soft ban. Please read: >>330674 Please use another board for such content. Options include but are not limited to…

>>>/fur/

>>>/htg/

Post last edited at

 No.332904

>>332871

>On 3/29: Furfags and Cuckshit have been given a soft ban

Wait, doesn't that include CoC?

On a side note, i have no problems with games that have NTR in them, however i do have a problem with games mostly about NTR

Albeit, I personally prefer games which have NTR in them to allow you to dodge the NTR or content, or just disable it through toggle. Games that force you through NTR are terrible unless you can get revenge

I will however hold on to the belief that NTR as a fail state in games shouldn't be considered an NTR game so long as the win condition isnt NTR.


 No.332906

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but….

what is that game where you have girl in your basement and you have X days to train her to be obedient and you shitpost about her training on 2ch?

the core game loop is you lewd her until her endurance runs out and then you wait until the next day


 No.332929

>>332904

>Wait, doesn't that include CoC?

See >>331000.

>>332906

>I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but….

Technically, >>16620 would have been a lot more ideal but what done, is already done.

>what is that game where you have girl in your basement and you have X days to train her to be obedient and you shitpost about her training on 2ch?

I am 99.999% certain that is the 'Sealed Room Breed' series.


 No.332982

5th for cuck-tan is CUTE and needs autistic/artistic representation.


 No.333002

>>332904

What about games like Seeds of Chaos which are obviously intended to be rampant cuckshit but they make it "opt out" so they can argue it's optional when someone criticizes them?

I think it's a "I know it when I see it" situation with a bit of leeway for personal/vol interpretation.

>>332982

6th


 No.333073

>>330901

>The thing a lot of people have raged and shitstormed over have been avoidable NTR/cucking

To be fair, the EraGames thread had a cuck infestation a ways back. The cucks got really pissed that a broken event that cucks the player was put on a toggle with the default being off. For context, this was one of the only events that wasn't on a toggle to begin with. You just had to accept that this rando fat ass would regularly ask to fuck your woman and would just take her anyway if you did anything but politely ask him to go away.

the thread had fairly regular complaints coming in about that exact event from people who had only recently picked up the game and didn't know about the event ahead of time, as well as complaints from people (me included) that didn't like that there was no way to permanently get rid of this guy who kept taking up event slots. Cucks started crying 'censorship' about their fetish having to play by the same rules as everyone else's and not being forced on everyone.

>>331066

I'll be honest, I'd fuck both those dragons. I get why furry isn't okay here, and I agree with it, but I still think there is a tasteful side to the furry stuff. Like the difference between amazonian women and giantess porn. Similar concepts, but one taken to weird extremes that I just can't understand.

Still though, the furry 'community' is a pack of degenerates that ruin games with their shitty donut steel OCs.


 No.333087

>>333073

The retarded sparkedog OCs have always been around in the furry fandom, but it seems to have gotten really insufferable in recent times. Between that and a bunch of prominent figures getting outed as pedos, the whole scene is just a giant dumpster fire.

Furries have historically been an invasive species, and that is true today more than ever. Cuckoldry should probably be treated the same way considering the fetish is oddly politicized now. God knows PC bullshit is the last thing we need here.


 No.333123

>>333118

I'm not sure that you understand how internet communities work. You have to be proactive about cultivating the kind of content you want in your board, or else foreign bodies will take over.


 No.333138

>>333002

>I think it's a "I know it when I see it" situation with a bit of leeway for personal/vol

That is the absolute worst way to do moderation.


 No.333142

>>333138

Why? This isn't the fucking Hague, nobody here is Emmanuel Kant, nobody cares about intangible ideals of justice or whatever, we just want the right content.


 No.333145

>>333123

More or less this. The current foreign bodies on this board long took over almost six months ago in my opinion though.


 No.333146

>>333142

>Why?

Because in the end the enforcement is arbitrary and inconsistent. On top of that you get constant arguments over interpretation and bitching about vols which leads to retards forming factions that fight with one another and turn everything to shit. It's none of the freedom that you want in a chan combined with all of the pointless shit-flinging that you find on social media.


 No.333147

>>332982

So is the lore behind cuck-tan that she's so fucking thirsty for cock that her brain stopped working and she wants every man to solely focus on hording as many virgins as possible in order to maximize her chances of getting her holes filled?


 No.333148

>>333147

You underestimate her. Cuck-tan’s autism is so severe she wouldn’t be able to get her hymen broken even if she was the last girl on earth.


 No.333166

>>333073

>I get why furry isn't okay here, and I agree with it, but I still think there is a tasteful side to the furry stuff

In theory, yes, but it's the same problem with cuckshit, even when cuckshit have no defense. In the case of furries, the problem is not the porn they produce but the kind of people it attracts. Furry porn can be really fucking good, since that's the power of autism or at least autismbucks. But if you allow them you soon will find more and more people wondering how Yoshi's feet smell like. In that last instance, it's really probable that allowing cuckshit in any way will only and logically attract more cucks. That's why both should be forbidden regardless.

>>333146

So? You'd only be affected if you are a cuck yourself.

>Chan

>Freedom

Yeah, you certainly don't belong here. You are contradicting yourself, first, you want your "chans" to be strictly moderated but then you also want to be "free" to like whatever shit you want. You are just a faggot that gets offended when he is called on your shit taste and so you call it shit flinging.


 No.333181

File: d4971aee943014e⋯.jpg (110.75 KB, 773x785, 773:785, Except NTR.jpg)

>>333002

>I think it's a "I know it when I see it" situation with a bit of leeway for personal/vol interpretation.

I think its a pretty bad idea to give the mods any kind of personal interpretation, but at the same time i know where you're coming from.

Technically I would think that seeds of chaos should be allowed as it contains shit that isn't NTR while at the same time makes NTR skippable.

Although I haven't played it since the very first build came out so i have no idea what methods they've put into to stop NTR.

Does every time a possible NTR scene comes up does it ask to you to skip it? because that would be fucking annoying

Also if the prelude to the cuck content is exactly the same, doesn't that mean you're still getting NTR'ed except you can't see the actual NTRing?

Honestly IMO it depends on how they block the NTR content in the game that determines whether its NTR or not, if the game includes content or dialogue that suggests that the NTR scene from before occurred, then its an NTR game. If the game contains unavoidable NTR that you can't get revenge for, its an NTR game. If the game starts with NTR but has no further NTR in it, maybe its not an NTR game?

Honestly i just feel like the anons asking for any kind of game that has NTR in it to be banned are actually being weak faggots.

IF there is NTR in a game in one of the threads, you should bully the cucks that want it.

Cucks are the lowest kind of human being, they NEED to be bullied, they deserve it, otherwise they and others will never know how fucking awful creatures they are.


 No.333184

>>333145

eastern european stilted english pornography is cuckoldry definitely-not-from-/pol/ has been posting longer than that.


 No.333192

>>333181

(((OPTIONAL))) or not, it's still cuckshit and allowing it will only attract more cucks. You are basically asking for cuck games to be allowed. Are you stupid or false flagging/virtue signalling?


 No.333197

>>333181

I don’t mind cucking being banned, except for how it raises questions on “what else are they going to ban” but fuck it, let’s cross that bridge when we come to it.

The problem comes when total fucking retards, and by that I mean one particular total fucking retard, comes and says that any woman being fucked by any man that isn’t explicitly a self-insert is cucking. Because that would preclude quite literally 95% of games on this board.


 No.333198

>>333197

No one seriously listens to that fag.


 No.333199

>>333192

>it's still cuckshit and allowing it will only attract more cucks. You are basically asking for cuck games to be allowed

This might be hard for you to understand, but there are games that aim to provide an audience for cuckolds, and there are games that have NTR content in them as a plot device or narrative tool.

I actually have no problem with a game with cuck content in it so long as most of the content is not cucked and you can skip/dodge/stop the cuck content that is there (and so long as it isn't alluded to further in the story). I mean gods knows how many games I've played that had, scat, dark skin and guro that I didn't mind so long as i wasn't forced to go through that literal and figurative shit.

Yes i know that NTR is sort of more indication of the type of person who wants this content and how subhuman they are whereas the others are just disgusting fetishes, but i still don't see why we can't just put them in their places when they come here Which they will even if cucked is absolutely banned, you're lying to yourself if you think cuckfags only exclusively play cuck games.

Its almost like you're afraid of dealing with them personally.

>Are you stupid or false flagging/virtue signalling?

I have no idea what you mean here.

what the fuck am I Falseflagging? Virtue signalling on /hgg/?

are you fucking retarded, do you not even understand what these words mean?

It sounds like you're just shitting the thread up with buzzwords you've heard.

tldr:

Cucks can and will be bullied, cuck games that are overwhelmingly cuck content or force you to be cucked will not be allowed here, NTR can actually be a plot point or narrative device in a game which is why I don't want it banned otherwise we will never get a shield hero parody game and anon has no idea what certain 'buzzwords' mean.


 No.333202

>>333200

Oh Boy, will there be furry cuckholdry?

I would play the fuck out of that just to see how far i could make it until i vomit


 No.333203

>>333199

>NTR can actually be a plot point or narrative device in a game which is why I don't want it banned otherwise we will never get a shield hero parody game and anon has no idea what certain 'buzzwords' mean.

I think that little tidbit about a "10% exception" more or less covers this aspect.


 No.333205

>>333200

>Not touched since 3/29

How about you give anons a reason to go there?


 No.333206

>>333203

>I think that little tidbit about a "10% exception" more or less covers this aspect.

to be honest fam, I could play a game so long as its 70%+ not cucked

as soon as you get near a third it goes to shit

90% seems a bit rigid for games that are just starting out, will there be a leniency for incomplete games that havn't got at least 9 sex scenes that aren't of the NTR variety?

Wouldn't this mean i wont hear about the shield hero parody until its got at least 10 sex scenes?


 No.333224

>>333200

>>333210

>>333208

This board seems lame as fuck and lacks content that exists here. What use would there be to split the userbase of /hgg/? It would make sense if the BO and vols were acting as retarded as (((Mark))), such as how successful the /k/-led /vg/ split has been mayorly due to (((Mark)))'s team complete incompetence at moderating /v/ to make it actually be about discussing videogames instead of webcomics, reddit and fucking blogposting. However, banning furries while being completely lax on nearly everything else, barring obvious crossniggers from Fag95 and v0.001 patreonshits advertising their garbage, is already complete opposite of what (((Mark))) does.

What is the point of this? Do you just want "/b/ but with hgames" or something? Isn't that already what /htg/ is, barring the focus on trainer games?


 No.333227

>>333146

>Because in the end the enforcement is arbitrary and inconsistent.

That's the best part about community policing. Can you name a single instance of the moderation going awry here? No, because there is community trust, which is far more effective than hard and fast restrictive rules.

> On top of that you get constant arguments over interpretation and bitching about vols which leads to retards forming factions that fight with one another and turn everything to shit.

One autist REEEEEEing doesn't mean there is "constant arguments" nor will her autism actually be alleviated by concrete rules.

Case by case is best for small boards like this. Rules will just allow for autistic lawyering of said rules.


 No.333228

>>333166

>So? You'd only be affected if you are a cuck yourself.

Everyone is affected when the board is swamped by retards like you calling each other cucks in every thread.


 No.333236

>>333227

>That's the best part about community policing.

Moderation is not "community policing."

>Can you name a single instance of the moderation going awry here?

I don't really keep track.

>One autist REEEEEEing doesn't mean there is "constant arguments" nor will her autism actually be alleviated by concrete rules.

I doubt that one faggot is responsible for all the thread derailments let alone their perpetuation.

>Rules will just allow for autistic lawyering of said rules

I don't want more rules. I want fewer, simpler rules. A few simple rules allow for very little lawyering. Mods should not get involved in how the users interact. That is when you get actual community policing.


 No.333242

File: c00c25fc640b9a5⋯.png (169.81 KB, 750x750, 1:1, c00c25fc640b9a51bc4e7edeb8….png)

>>333237

No i did not ignore the last thread, i actively posted on it a few times to shit on cuck-tan even. You're making Zero sense and are outright grasping at straws on why people should join your board.

>I won't do anything about crossposters

They're already bullied 24/7 here by the userbase. Problem with crossniggers is they will still keep posting as long as they aren't banned and purged from the thread, which is part of the reason /v/ fucking sucks. (((Mark))) does absolutely nothing about those faggots and they end up flooding threads with shitposting even after being called out on their shit. Your stance doesn't solve this issue at all.

>Arbitrarily enforced on what you should or not consume

But nothing is arbitrary. The community outcried about a faggot making a completely shit thread for a v0.001 patreon game that was nothing but shilling for people to buy it and catcalling for the furry community to swamp the board ala eternal september, instead of a normal thread to discuss an hgame for its merits, how to play it, its content or whatever. Was rightfully banned and rules were updated to catch any more attempts at something similar, as well as exception cases for existing threads that are still alive on the board.

Where was the censorship? What censorship even?

I really don't get ya.

If there was a legitimate reason to switch, i would because it's logical to do so, but i don't see one.


 No.333244

>>333242

>Where was the censorship? What censorship even?

not allowing content you personally don't like is somehow not censorship?


 No.333302

>>333199

I don't care what you have problems with or not. If it have Ntr on it in any way or form, it's cuckshit and deserves to be shit on. Plot device? Still catered towards cucks like you.

>b-but NTR makes the story interesting!

Imagine having a story so bland that you need to include something that aggravates the player as a way to draw people in. It's shit and, specially, cuckshit.


 No.333304

>>333244

It isn't, my reddit spacing friend. Liking NTR makes you a troll, since no one sane would like it. Even if it was allowed, it will just be shitted on by the user even if vols didn't outright delete the thread. That kind of fetish are only used to flame stuff.


 No.333305

>>333197

>Because that would preclude quite literally 95% of games on this board.

Only because you play cuck games doesn't mean 95% of them are cuck games. What else, do you think you are a pimp because you masturbate in the corner while a nigger fucks a girl? Kys.


 No.333307

>>333206

Nobody cares about your shield hero cuckshit. Even if it get to have more non-NTR scenes, it would start as and essentially be a cuck game. I think the 10% is retarded. 1% NTR content is bad enough.


 No.333309

>>333208

>It really isn't my place to police art.

>Cuckolding is art

Holy shit ,this is your mind on fence sitting. I'm going to have so much fun spamming those threads.


 No.333318

>>333317

You just watch.


 No.333322

>>333309

It gets better anon >>333237 >>333210

>If you just smell and ignore the shit next to you and say nothing you are an adult

This is like 4th grade mentality of what "being an adult" is, let alone care for it. That anon is probably the kind of guy that would smoke and drink only because "that's what adults do".

>>333237

>So 4am, wallpaper, whatever >>>/b/ like won't be allowed since it's a sexy games general: talk about games, and have fun.

This is what killed /a/ and people moved over to /animu/. For someone that wants "freedom" and shit, you are being a retard about it.

The same way you say you can "ignore things you don't like", you can also ignore derailment if you truly care, you cannot only hide threads but posts as well. "derailment", ie derivation of the topic at hand, such as talking about other video games and not exclusively h-games, is pretty normal in imageboards, and there's nothing wrong with that.

But then again, you're the kind of idiot that decides to add pic related as a banner. I wouldn't be surprised that anyone who actually tried to get in your board would leave it asap because of it, because we are not talking about a thread or an specific kink or game, but a banner, something you can't avoid.

At this point, it seems obvious you're actually supporting cuckolding, so IF your board gets famous, it'd be known as the cuckboard, and it'd be constantly shit on.

I'm guessing you're trying to make cuckchan's /d/, or to a closer extend what /chaos/ is for /monster/, but you will hopefully fail hard just as how /chaos fail hard to people who actually like monster GIRLS


 No.333323

File: ef3eb9dc9c82814⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 65.71 KB, 300x100, 3:1, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333322

Shit, I forgot the pic


 No.333324

>>333321

>Shitting on NTR makes you a child

>Shitting on NTR makes you a cuck

This is why nobody wants to go to your board.


 No.333326

>>333325

I don't really need my thoughts to be policed when I don't have shit taste like you, cuck.


 No.333339

File: 58c792e55bb1bd1⋯.jpg (39.19 KB, 634x462, 317:231, Pissed off Mana chan angry….jpg)

>>333302

>theres no difference between a game with 2% cuck shit and 100% cuck shit

>I would never touch a game like that

I've played a whole lot of shitty RPGmaker games and cuck shit isnt that uncommon.

However most of the time it allows you to either ignore it or dodge it, so in the end i just ignore it

If you've been on any /hgg/ for any amount of time you should already know that cuck content being in a game is almost unavoidable if you play any amount of /hgg/ games

>Even if it was allowed, it will just be shitted on by the user even if vols didn't outright delete the thread. That kind of fetish are only used to flame stuff.

liliths throne is at least 30% cuck shit and theres quite a few games up there that have it as well. The difference between cuck games and games that have cucked shit in them is if you can remove it or not, and if theres even a game there if you take the cuck shit out,

I can list you some of the games that contain NTR content if you want:

>liliths throne

>Degrees of lewdity

>/egg/

>One of those avatar trainers

>FC

>no Haven

>newlife

>untitled 3d sex game

>flexible survival

>one of the avatar trainers, albeit might not actually be the one on this board

>ect…

And thats just the games i know definitely have it and i can bet that several of the others have NTR shit in them as well

However all of those games have something in common and thats just that you can skip/toggle/dodge all that shitty content.

Thats why i think the 10% is too low for beginning games.

You can keep calling me a cuck all you want, but at least i can tell the difference between a cuck game and a game with cuck shit in it.

go hang yourself faggot


 No.333341

>>333339

I..don't remember the cuck stuff in FC, mind elaborating? Unless you mean that fucking awful hacker.


 No.333342

File: d5197fbd6fd6d49⋯.jpg (74.96 KB, 960x590, 96:59, 23472392.jpg)

>>333339

>It's not uncommon so it should be accepted

Kill yourself. And even then, you are wrong. Just play good games instead of shit games.

>However most of the time it allows you to either ignore it or dodge it, so in the end i just ignore it

>Just close your eyes and pretend it doesn't happen

Pathetic. It's still cuckshit.

>If you've been on any /hgg/ for any amount of time you should already know that cuck content being in a game is almost unavoidable if you play any amount of /hgg/ games

Not true. I played plenty. It must be because I actually play good games. Even shitty RPG maker games have plenty of non cuckshit games. You can also go for respectable developers that don't do cuckshit. There are ways, you are just justifying it.

>liliths throne is

A containment thread like most text based games threads. It have already been proved that Fag95 lurk those threads and they are probably the majority, and no one do anything, because it is a containment thread.

>And thats just the games i know

Well, you are full of shit. The Avatar game doesn't have it, and the rest are, surprise, text games, even that one that re-started the "furries fuck off" policy is in there, and guess what, it's also shit, plus a literal text game with a female MC.

>Thats why i think the 10% is too low for beginning games.

Quite the contrary. It's way too high.

>but at least i can tell the difference between a cuck game and a game with cuck shit in it.

Really? Because they both have cuck content in it, either if it's 1% or 100%, it's still shit and deserves to be shit on.


 No.333344

File: f730a4b43d234b3⋯.jpg (38 KB, 512x384, 4:3, f730a4b43d234b3e3b51b0fa4a….jpg)

>>333339

tl:dr

>NTR is ok because the games I play have NTR in them


 No.333346

>>333206

>shield hero parody

Fuck you. You made me think it's a thing.


 No.333358

>>333342

>It's not uncommon so it should be accepted

Die in a hole faggot, I just said that cuck content will always exist (because it makes easy patreonbux), and NTR fags deserve bully

I just think if anons were more hostile to them they wouldn't come here, giving the mods extra powers to attack one type of fetish is just giving them more unnecessary power.

>Just close your eyes and pretend it doesn't happen

Depends on how they block off the cuck content as i said before, in some games you can actually kill the guy who cucks you before he does it

Other games just remove dialogue, some games do shit all and even have references to it, but those games are actual cuck games.

>all text-based threads are containment threads

>everything i dislike is a containment thread

except they're not faggot, And if you think containment threads actually work make an NTR thread you potato nigger

>The Avatar game doesn't have it,

I don't think it was Four element trainer, but there used to be 3 or 4 other ones, one which had a scene where you could watch katara (I think it was katara) suck someone off in a tent

>any amount of cuck content makes a game cucked unless its >1%

that's just retarded. go suck on cock, you're almost as bad as that guy who says all porn is a form of cuckoldry, or playing as a female mc makes you a cuck

>>333341

>I..don't remember the cuck stuff in FC, mind elaborating? Unless you mean that fucking awful hacker.

You can literally marry one of your slaves and then let them fuck other slaves. theres a few other things involving other arcologies but thats about it. Although yes, there is the awful hacker, not sure if you can count that though.

>>333344

>NTR is ok because the games I play have NTR in them

I've played hundreds of shitty RPG maker games cunt, And a good portion of them have cuck shit in them

I'm not saying you should play them at all, most of them are pure garbage, but I'm trying to say that not every game that has cuck shit in it is automatically garbage. (but definitely when its forced or the game is geared towards it)


 No.333389

File: c106de169af2ed4⋯.jpg (45.42 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 2017-04-12-clz5pdrc_x8.jpg)

crashing this board with no survivors

get rekted, degenerates.


 No.333394

>>333358

Actually, faggot, yes, if a game have even just 1 NTR scene it is a NTR game. Just because it isn't ONLY a NTR game doesn't mean that it isn't, in fact, a NTR. If a game have NTR in it, it is garbage in the first place.


 No.333398

File: d87bda2975581a8⋯.png (5.91 MB, 2144x3000, 268:375, Slutty Rabbit Tewi cucks R….png)

>>333394

I can't keep up with this, defending NTR in the first place is already killing me

Can't we just agree to disagree?

I think games can have a ratio of NTR avoidable content to non-NTR content (so long as the NTR content is avoidable) and still be classified as good

You think NTR is like the single drop rule

On a side note, does cuckquean count as cuck content for you?


 No.333401

>>333398

No, because you are ddefending NTR. I'll put it simply, it either is or isn't a NTR game no matter if it's (((OPTIONAL))) or not. AAnd if it has even a single NTR scene, it can't be good.

And no, cuckqueaning is not NTR since I'm not a woman.


 No.333413

File: 72ace1a4b2e75b3⋯.jpg (216.89 KB, 1610x906, 805:453, sanic done wrong.jpg)

>>333401

>And no, cuckqueaning is not NTR since I'm not a woman.

I don't think that's quite correct, the reasoning why cucking is bad is less to do with which sex you are and more to do with societal norms and the warped mind you must have to be a cuckold in said society.


 No.333424

>>333413

>It's just a social construct!

Holy shit, no, tumblr. It's really simple biology. A man can impregnate multiple women so it makes sense for a man to have multiple partners as long as he can provide and women are attracted to such man. There are no practical reasons for a woman to have more than one partner except being a disgusting slut. So no, it's not a construct, it's a fact.

What you are trying to say is that it's not seen as bad for a woman to be a cuck contrary to a man, and even then, even if it is societal, it resides in the fact that if a woman rathers be with someone else than you then you are patethic from a biological or societal point of view, maybe you are a loser or you have a small dick, so it's a shame for a man to be cucked, contrary to a woman which might as well share her man for reproduction.


 No.333425

>>332871

>On 3/29: Furfags and Cuckshit have been given a soft ban

wait, I thought the whole NTR hate thing was a joke. why would anyone care about fetishes are in a game they don't play? I mean I think incest stuff is gross but I'm not going to petition for it's removal.


 No.333431

>>333425

Nobody cares about what you like or dislike. NTR being shit is a fact, not subjective.


 No.333433

>>333424

>there are no practical reasons for a woman to have more than one partner

[Citation needed.] If that were true, there wouldn't be any female infidelity nor the need for mate guarding for their partners. Off the top of my head, it prevents them from putting all eggs in a single basket from the genetic standpoint. Less genetically uniform offspring means for cheating slut's bloodline more chances of surviving an epidemic, for example.


 No.333436

>>333398

>I think games can have a ratio of NTR avoidable content to non-NTR content (so long as the NTR content is avoidable) and still be classified as good

And that's basically how the rules have been fleshed out regarding what would get the "cuck" ban or "furfag" ban. Continue shitting on NTR, but blatant games designed around NTR will get the hammer.


 No.333437

File: 287106bb43efc46⋯.png (351.38 KB, 711x822, 237:274, 287106bb43efc465111566b063….png)

>>333425

Long story short, someone who was from off-board was using CoC as an excuse to push a furshit game and implicitly stated it was a furry invasion of the board/they weren't from around here. The vol locked the thread, there was a fight in the previous meta thread, the NTR shit had been ongoing, so BO decided enough was enough (after a few vols said something to him) since furshit and NTR are the only two groups that consistently create unneeded 20+ queue report queues and seem to be defended the most vehemently by a handful of sites that we don't mind visiting but don't want acting like they belong here.


 No.333438

File: e34c7dad90c5c8b⋯.png (2.12 MB, 1366x768, 683:384, justice_has_arrived.png)

Repost from the FC thread since I was drunk last night and probably should have posted it here.

Question since FC seems to consistently be the only thread screeching for moderation day-in and day-out while the rest of the board functions semi-normally.

How would anons feel about possibly getting a new volunteer dedicated to this thread? Answer in the poll, responses in the FC thread to me will be deleted for derailing the thread.

https://poal.me/xn5zpn

Obviously they'd basically be just a regular vol, but they'd more specifically be brought on for FC threads.

Also on the off-chance that you are interested, shoot me an email answering the following extremely important questions. That way I can filter out the shitters before forwarding the rest to BO.

Email me here: notcia@national.shitposting.agency

Again, responding in this thread will see your post at minimum deleted/no response returned (and your email thrown out) for being unable to fucking read/for derailing the thread further.

>Do you have previous vol experience?

>How large (both # of files and size) is your smug folder?

>Which 2hu would you fuck (and why)?

>Are you capable of taking it easy? What did you do the last time you took it easy?

>How often are you available to moderate the board? When are you able to? Possible schedule?

>Are you capable of enforcing the rules? Even when you disagree with them?

>How long have you been browsing anonymous imageboards?

>What is your opinion on the state of FC threads? Of /hgg/ as a whole?

>How much pornography do you consume on a weekly basis?

>Why do you want to moderate /hgg/?


 No.333440

>>333433

You're correct on a technical level, but you're missing the point of the statement. There are no practical reasons (from a male perspective) for a woman to have more than one partner. She still is either fucking for the sake of fucking or popping out kids of unknown heritage. The underlying implication isn't about her popping out kids of unknown heritage and taking care of them herself, it's about doing so and making the guy unrelated to the kid raise said kid. If she wants the money she has to give the honey and she better not be sharing that fucking honey.


 No.333441

>>333437

wouldn't the solution here be to ban the people causing a fuss or isolate those topics to their own thread? removing the topic entirely is giving trolls power just for being annoying.

"don't shit on other people's fetishes" should be common sense for a board of already niche sexual interests.


 No.333446

>>333236

>Moderation is not "community policing."

Potato tomato

>I don't really keep track.

Long winded way of saying "no". I asked for a single example, it can't really be that hard, can it? Because if there's no instances in which the current system is bad, why are you trying so hard to change it?

>I doubt that one faggot is responsible for all the thread derailments let alone their perpetuation.

Doubt all you want, look for yourself. Cuck-tan is supremely dedicated.

>I don't want more rules. I want fewer, simpler rules.

I didn't say "more rules", I said "rules". What we have now is guidelines, not rules, so mods have discretion and can be reasonable and some faggot screeching because "technically in this scenario the player character isn't the one fucking a girl" doesn't lead to shit happening and she's just screeching in the darkness like she usually does. Hard and fast rules will only lead to lawyering.


 No.333447

>cucks vs anti-cucks

Hello /htg/!


 No.333448

>>333441

It's funny, because the logic is "we have to stop these people because they cause constant shitstorms and ruin everything!" and right now the only people who are ruining everything and causing shitstorms are the one poster who thinks owning sex slaves is cuckoldry


 No.333449

File: df6540488a90ecb⋯.jpg (156.72 KB, 850x1209, 850:1209, 1537669590243-1.jpg)

>>333441

>wouldn't the solution here be to ban the people causing a fuss or isolate those topics to their own thread?

Both were tried, both result in the people from those isolated topics becoming bigger and bigger faggots who spread to other boards. This isn't something that happened in the last few months with Cuck-tan, it's something that's been happening for several years. At least since the towergirls fiasco if not even further back. They have containment boards at this point if they're really upset, and there's nothing stopping a dev from using one if they want to explicitly make a cuck game or furry game. If someone ever thinks their game was unjustly banned, there's both the email option or simply the posting in the meta thread option. The only things banned in the meta thread are literal spam and avatarfagging like >>333328

>"don't shit on other people's fetishes" should be common sense for a board of already niche sexual interests.

/hgg/ is a big tent board of fetishes. "Don't shit on other people's fetishes" is the kind of garbage that belongs on Fag95 and similar websites. This is an anonymous imageboard, shitting on someone's fetish should be the standard, not a cause for alarm. Anons get banned for nonstop shitposting that prevents discussion due to intensity and for being an outsider, but it's the job of a thread's denizens to defend their fetish, not the job of a volunteer who only evens the playing field when someone brings a gun to a boxing match. As for niche fetishes, they're allowed and no one is going to stop them, but /hgg/ is simultaneously AnCapistan and also the "internet Nazis" of the porn world. Most fetishes might get a disgruntled sigh but are looked over because they aren't creating problems. Those particular two fetishes do nothing but create problems on this board most of the time. They've been doing it for years. The vols are pretty good about justifying their responses if they do something out-of-hand since the board logs are public (link in OP) and they aren't supposed to just delete/ban things in the meta thread without very good reason. For every normalfag fetish that has a strong reasoning behind it being disliked here (whether social or monetary pressures are the reasons for such, see our disdain for patreon which is a major source of furry, though the two are mutually exclusive), there's two more fetishes that are allowed and welcomed here that very few other places on the internet will openly allow. For every furry that's shot, a loli is born. For every cuck we hang, three womb-fucking ogres are born. It's just the nature of this place.


 No.333450

>>333433

>Off the top of my head, it prevents them from putting all eggs in a single basket from the genetic standpoint.

You are full of shit. They'd have to wait 9 months for even a chance of getting pregnant by anothe dick, so the genetic diverse come from men impregnating multiple women, cuck, otherwise women would be able to get impregnated by multiple men at once. Seeing how the contrary is true, then no, a woman having multiple partners is not practical, while the contrary is.


 No.333451

>>333449

>/hgg/ is a big tent board of fetishes. "Don't shit on other people's fetishes" is the kind of garbage that belongs on Fag95 and similar websites. This is an anonymous imageboard, shitting on someone's fetish should be the standard, not a cause for alarm.

Nah, being a niggerfaggot and whining should rightly be bannable behavior.


 No.333452

>>333446

>Potato tomato

No, you idiot, moderation is not the community making a decision about a given issue. It is definatively one individual or a group of individuals who are distinct from the community making decisions at least ostensibly on their behalf. Community policing is users telling a troublemaker to fuck off.

>I asked for a single example, it can't really be that hard, can it?

I am not interested in telling the mods that they should not have banned such and such OP whose thread none the less is full of on-topic discussion. I just don't want them to start doing our job for us, which is acting as a community.

>Because if there's no instances in which the current system is bad, why are you trying so hard to change it?

The system is changing right now. That's the whole point.

>Hard and fast rules will only lead to lawyering.

Bullshit. Your "guidelines" lead to lawyering, just as they have been.


 No.333453

File: dc0b2f59c406945⋯.jpg (48.82 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 1537049698364.jpg)

>>333451

And you have about twenty or so porn forums that agree with you, yet you continue coming here, fucking kike.


 No.333454

>>333452

>I am not interested in telling the mods that they should not have banned such and such OP whose thread none the less is full of on-topic discussion. I just don't want them to start doing our job for us, which is acting as a community.

What you just said is a total nonsequitur to what I asked.

>The system is changing right now. That's the whole point.

And your point is that you have no real reason for implementing what you are asking.

>Bullshit. Your "guidelines" lead to lawyering, just as they have been.

Really. Because the only lawyering I have seen is cuck-tan whining that there are no hard and fast rules and that something that almost barely could be counted as cuckoldry, if you asked an autistic alien who has never seen porn before, isn't getting banned because there's no hard and fast rule on the subject. Again, feel free to give me an example, of which you have provided none.


 No.333455

>>333453

hi cuck-tan


 No.333457

>>333449

Thing is, the only problems being created are on the side of the purists. I don't see furries constantly starting shit here, but cuck-tan is happy to pick up the slack.


 No.333460

That and the shitposting has DEFINITELY seen a big uptick in recent months, if the moderation keeps up the bans even someone who prides himself in "weaponized autism" will get bored eventually.


 No.333461

>>333460

>if the moderation keeps up the bans even someone who prides himself in "weaponized autism" will get bored eventually.

The existence of Johnny Nigger on /n/ disproves this point.


 No.333463

>>333449

>Both were tried, both result in the people from those isolated topics becoming bigger and bigger faggots who spread to other boards.

isn't this just conceding that the board's management has no real power and should just do whatever the loudest voice wants? I get that running anonymous boards is hard but explicitly taking that stance could be asking for trouble.

>shitting on someone's fetish should be the standard

I'm not opposed to banter, but fetishes are inherently subjective, there's no real constructive discussion to be had. the only direction I can see those smaller fights going in is escalation until it becomes an actual problem for everybody. again, I get that there's a balancing act. but it feels like volunteers are condoning the very same posts that are forcing them to the more authoritative decisions.

I'd put money down that even if those two fetishes were taken out of the picture, people would find another one to get up in arms about. and it's not like it's rare for these communities to attract the type of people who just want to see shit burn.


 No.333464

>>333463

This. I have no desire to see muh porn board overrun by loud retards who scream until they get what they want.


 No.333490

honestly I'd be more concerned about all the shitty shovelwares and people spamming patreon links over people contained on specific threads that catter to their interest, they aren't clogging the board and I doubt they are the one shitposting on other people's threads.

People that spam threads with shitty OPs shilling their patreons and the people that are just being contrarian for the sake of trolling are the one that should be dealt with.

It's fine to critic a game but users harassing people on the threads because they don't have the same taste or the game isn't what they want it to be should be promptly dealt with. Whining about a game that's about tentacle porn because there's tentacle porn is silly and a waste of space on the thread.


 No.333493

>>333441

>"don't shit on other people's fetishes" should be common sense for a board of already niche sexual interests.

Imagine being this much of a fenceshitter. Your fetish is shit, deal with it.


 No.333496

>>333448

and here's a poster proving my point:

>>333493


 No.333498

>>333448

Owning sex slaves isn't cuckolding, retard, the cuck part is when you give them away and then just watch as they are fucked like a cuck.

Pimps are only niggers, and I don't know if being a nigger is worse than being a cuck, it's probably just as bad.


 No.333499

>>333498

Doushio! Cuck-tan noticed me!


 No.333501

File: e0bf490670faa59⋯.png (50.48 KB, 199x212, 199:212, e0bf490670faa59cfdc4078863….png)

>>333499

>everyone I don't like is cuck-tan


 No.333502

File: 40567003111d9ab⋯.png (72.35 KB, 220x293, 220:293, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333501

At this point, kind of. The whole "cuck-Tan" meme is getting out of control, used as boogeyman. And the funny part is that it doesn't ridicule anyone. Everyone hates cuckolding, so effectively everyone is cuck-tan at some extent. Even the vols said they don't disagree with the spammers.


 No.333503

File: a8e5c4c5b8869d7⋯.jpg (39.3 KB, 597x531, 199:177, 12249968.jpg)

>>333502

>is getting out of control, used as boogeyman

>it doesn't ridicule anyone

Then it can't be a boogeyman. I don't really think it is getting out of control, just a few retards trying to push it as if it was funny or it meant anything. This is the first time I've been called cuck-tan and I can count a lot of posts that get called cuck-tan by probably a single retard.


 No.333504

>>333463

>isn't this just conceding that the board's management has no real power and should just do whatever the loudest voice wants?

I don't see how lacking power immediately means giving anyone what they want. Vols just said they won't get involved, as it should be, except for explicit NTR and furshit.

>but fetishes are inherently subjective

And this is where you fall for your own Fag95 stupidity. No, fetishes are not subjective, some of them are objectively worst than others, there's literally a shit fetish, there's guro, then there's inflation and that kind of shit furries like. If you are meaning to tell me those are not OBJECTIVELY shit, one being literally shit, then you must have problems.

This is the "everything is ok mentality" that prevents people from forming their own opinion because they fear they may offend someone, in an anonymous imageboard of all places. People who likes those fetishes should be shamed, and they can decide to ignore it or to get upset like faggots.


 No.333506

>>333501

N-no, I love you, cuck-tan!

It's just that it's so easy to recognize someone who has such a hilariously broad definition of what constitutes "cuck".

>>333502

Aah, she's even samefagging for me! Cute~!


 No.333508

File: 8ba6cf69b0fe70d⋯.jpg (152.14 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 8ba6cf69b0fe70d556a25baea5….jpg)

>>333506

>Everyone I don't like is cuck-tan

>Reddit spacing


 No.333509

File: c010132c4aa68d2⋯.jpg (48.47 KB, 415x398, 415:398, Capture.JPG)

File: 9fe9d118093de8e⋯.gif (800.07 KB, 540x405, 4:3, 9fe9d118093de8e5030833273b….gif)


 No.333511

File: 992a2530c8cd32d⋯.jpg (120.63 KB, 1387x688, 1387:688, Capture.JPG)

>>333509

Don't bother, he'll say you're just deleting cache or cookies.


 No.333514

>>333509

>>333511

>>333508

It's an all-out assault! Her favorite tactics too! Post your whole reaction folder, cuck-tan! Ganbatte!


 No.333520

File: e0b195637430836⋯.jpg (17.5 KB, 650x113, 650:113, faggot.JPG)


 No.333529

>>333520

Making cuck-tan edit screenshots


 No.333530

>>333504

that isn't even the issue you complete retard, the issue is that mods just remove it regardless, is the fact that users of a site who left cuckchan due to shitty moderation being concerned about shitty garbage mods beyond your comprehension?


 No.333531

>>333504

What the fuck is fag95 and why do everything-is-cuck autists keep insinuating people are secretly from it


 No.333543

>>333531

Namefag h-game forum.

It's shit and moderation there suck so much cock, that it could be measured in marathons.


 No.333561

>>333530

>the issue is that mods just remove it regardless

So? If you want cuckshit there are tons of alternatives as aforementioned, but not here, because here nobody likes cuckshit. If you don't like that fact, you can fuck off, nobody will miss you.


 No.333564

>>333530

I might be with you if you couldn't simply create your own board, but you can. I might be with you if you couldn't simply fork projects, but you can. Since there are remedies to the situation AND it involves staying on 8ch, you can fuck right off with your cuck and fur shit.


 No.333573

>>333424

> There are no practical reasons for a woman to have more than one partner except being a disgusting slut. So no, it's not a construct, it's a fact.

Social Construct isn't just a buzzword anon, it literally refers to constructs created by humans social interaction. In this case, marriage was created by humans wanting 1:1 exclusive partnering and is therefor a social construct. Just because its also practical doesn't mean its not a construct. You know, just like civilization?

Societal Norms in this case just refers to most societies believing that partners should be exclusively for each other. Reverse harems have existed before in society, but they are rare due to how biologically unnecessary they are as well as unpractical Shit happens all the time in France weirdly enough.

Also you could say the same of literally any animal, but take horses for instance. Mares literally fuck every stallion they can reach just so none of the stallions can figure out whose it is. Horses are like any animal, biological geared towards breeding, but due to their herd mentality having multiple partners is seen as a good thing. that and they're also fucking Animals, so sort of mute point

There is also the fact that previous sexual partner genetics have ended up in the offspring of a child, its just that its an extremely tiny amount, like less than 1%. Just putting it out there that used women don't give birth to just your child.

>>333440

>There are no practical reasons (from a male perspective) for a woman to have more than one partner.

In human society, yes, but as i mentioned before horses and other animals have a practical reason to be sluts. Its based on their social interactions, with being a herd species and all that. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some backwards barbarian society in the past that shared women, but coupled pairs were not allowed to fuck until marriage.

But yeah, in normal human society, what you say makes sense.

You just need to remember that not all humans think the same, take bug people for example.


 No.333576

>>333573

Holy shit,kill yourself, tumblrite, your post is garbage and so is your love for sluts.


 No.333582

>>333576

You have the same IQ as a nigger, jump off a building and help the gene pool.

Social Construct is a term older than Tumblr and the SJWs. Jesus Christ you come off so fucking retarded, just because they use that word incorrectly all that time, is the word ruined forever? This is the same logic that ended up putting 'literally' meaning its exact opposite in the oxford dictionary.

Something being a social construct and something being practical are not mutually exclusive.

And what part of what i said implies i like sluts?

Fucking end yourself you cocksucking cunt.


 No.333586

>>333582

And you are a nigger that likes sluts. Kill yourself, cuck.


 No.333594

>>333586

So you can't give me a reason, slit your wrists faggot


 No.333596

>>333582

You're using their language and speaking like they do - trying to suggest that e.g. human mating patterns are a "construct" which opens the door to the very relativistic moralism that gave rise to tumblr et al in the first place, while using the exact same arguments they use now to do so, without any actual factual basis that isn't entirely lifted whole cloth from (((anthropologists))) who were the first academic field to be pozzed.


 No.333605

>>333596

>human mating patterns are a "construct" which opens the door to the very relativistic moralism that gave rise to tumblr et al in the first place,

They are a construct, its just that they can also be practical. its why humans can have both monogamous pairings and harems. If it wasn't a social construct then it wouldn't be as various.

>which opens the door to the very relativistic moralism that gave rise to tumblr et al in the first place,

I can't deny this, thats quite correct. However I'm of the opinion that the social constructs of old were and are of practical use, which Tumblr and SJWs are counter to.

> while using the exact same arguments they use now to do so,

Yes and no, I am arguing that monogamous sexual pairings (marriage) is a social construct, which Tumblrs argues all the time, however i am not saying its useless and has an actual practical use which tuimblr willingly refuses to understand.

>without any actual factual basis that isn't entirely lifted whole cloth from (((anthropologists))) who were the first academic field to be pozzed.

I disagree mostly with this, albeit i will admit some of my opinions do come from Anthropology, which is indeed at the moment mostly pozzed. That doesn't necessarily make all the age old arguments useless. Also I'm pretty sure there were quite a few other fields that were pozzed first, such as Journalism, the arts and some social sciences.


 No.333608

>>333605

The problem with your logic, autist, is that then everything is a consturct, which is plain wrong. Even animal behaviour is a construct designed by animals themselves instead of patterns, which is what they are, patterns, that's why they are practical, because they have been proved to work before, so they keep happening.

Humans didn't construct shit like marriage, it was the most logical thing to do at the moment, to the point that most societies worked under a similar idea of what marriage is.

>He worships anthropology

I'm shocked. And no, anthropology fell before journalism or even arts.


 No.333625

>>333608

>The problem with your logic, autist, is that then everything is a construct,

I don't think everything is a construct, just that social interactions from intelligent beings can give rise different sexual behaviors and pairings, and as these can vary both in functionality and practicality, these can be called constructs. As in they were created by people/animals unintentionally to fill a social niche. This is more distinctive in the more intelligent animals which behave more on a learned basis where as the more instinctive lesser animals are more uniform

>Even animal behaviour is a construct designed by animals themselves instead of patterns, which is what they are, patterns, that's why they are practical, because they have been proved to work before, so they keep happening.

Some animal behaviors are instinctive, and some are more learned. Learned behaviors that are created via social interactions for the use in social situations can be considered on some level part of a social construct. I.e, shaking hands vs saluting a superior (not so much the action itself, but rather the reason for the action). They exist because they're different stations of power created by humans interacting with each other, which while i admit covers a huge amount of subjects, still does have a limit. SJWs will literally use it for anything.

Learned behaviors do not always have to have been proven to work to become an occurrence, especially when you have social media coming into existence, which has given rise to an entirely different type of social hierarchy.

Now excluding social media, I will admit that they are patterns, but patterns is an even broader subject, you can literally use patterns for almost anything. Not to mention patterns don't actually give you a reason for why they exist in the first place and more used as evidence or something, rather than an explanation for why something is happening in the first place. A social construct is an attempt at explaining the patterns between social interactions.

>Humans didn't construct shit like marriage, it was the most logical thing to do at the moment, to the point that most societies worked under a similar idea of what marriage is.

I think we're getting a out of sync here, Social construct doesn't mean that it was intentionally constructed, albeit you could argue that some of them actually were. Rather social construct means something created by social interactions. Its a construct not because it was created intentionally, but rather just that it was created by humans. Now you could argue that other animals which have monogamous parings are also social constructing them. However with animals i believe it is more instinctive in a lot of cases, being more of a result of genetics than actual learned behaviors. This is counter to what humans do, via learning their behaviors, which is why humans can have, harems, reverse harems, cuckolds, menage de trois (or however you spell that fucking french word) and asexual pandas. These can still be functional relationships providing most of whats needed by a social group,

However there is a great deal less practicality in these relationships vs monogamous relationships, which is why I consider them all social constructs. Animals are held back by genetically learned social behaviours, while humans can make their own.

>tldr

Patterns aren't mutually exclusive with social constructs, and actually encompass more things than social constructs. Also social constructs don't have to be intentionally made, they just need to be formed from human social interactions.

>I'm shocked. And no, anthropology fell before journalism or even arts.

I want some kind of citation for this, not because i don't believe you, but because it would be nice information to have


 No.333633

>>333438

>>Do you have previous vol experience?

oh, is this one of those situations where everyone only ever wants someone who has been a vol for years previously, meaning that it's impossible for anyone new to join?


 No.333644

I realize I'm late, but one of the board's resident medfags reporting in just to dab on cuck-tan having no idea how the fuck female sexual behavior works and still being wrong even in their cherry-picked example

>>333450

>otherwise women would be able to get impregnated by multiple men at once. Seeing how the contrary is true, then no, a woman having multiple partners is not practical, while the contrary is.

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1488855

OH NONONONO


 No.333647

>>333646

>anyone who uses memes I don't like should be banned

Fuck off.


 No.333663

>>333633

>oh, is this one of those situations where everyone only ever wants someone who has been a vol for years previously, meaning that it's impossible for anyone new to join?

That is very likely not the case, as if it was the vol would be kind enough to clearly specified a minimum amount up front.Unlike a certain board's application process, which shall not be named, yes I am still slightly salty about it. My reading is that it is similar to several sections on most job postings, ie. having some experience would be useful/beneficial but is not a hard requirement as the application's 'fit' with the organisation is in general not something that be so easily adjusted on a large scale. Hopefully >>333438 can clarify further.


 No.333683

>>333644

>Bitches about cherry picking

>Proceeds to cherry picpick a condition that almost never happen

>That still means it's a single pregnancypregnancy

>Cuckchan in

Reporting in to say I feel sorry for your patients. Although chances are you are a nurse and not a doctor. Either way, you are pathetic.


 No.333735

>>333683

>women would be able to get impregnated by multiple men at once

>women can get impregnated by multiple men at once

>W-well it's rare under modern circumstances so it doesn't count

Nice goalpost moving faggot.


 No.333738

>>333735

Babies can be born retarded, but that doesn't mean all of them do or that is the norm. But I get where you come from, seeing how you are a retard.

Women being impregnated by multiple partners can't happen even if multiple partners cum inside of them at the same time. It is actually rare as fuck and it isn't the norm.

So now, women can't get impregnated by multiple partners in a practical way, unlike men that can impregnate a couple of women in a single day, let alone a week or so.


 No.333743

File: dd4444a9f5f9145⋯.png (56.82 KB, 188x264, 47:66, d99aa2e1798b44725c43dec53e….png)

>>333633

>Oh, is this one of those situations where everyone only ever wants someone who has been a vol for years previously, meaning that it's impossible for anyone new to join?

Of course not. That would be asinine. It's a combination of what makes anon into anon. There's been a few small boards I've BO'd for (back when we first started migrating to 8chan) and there weren't any questions asked at all. It resulted in terrible results that killed said boards. As >>333663 said, it's more about "if you have it, it would be a consideration, but it's not a hard requirement." I can't outright state what the goals of those questions are as it could let someone game them, but they should be semi-obvious enough to anyone considering it. I'm not asking those questions to find someone that I get along with I'm just a drunken inactive after all, and I don't need to get along with someone I just need to be able to understand why they take certain actions, I'm looking for someone that the core users of the board, and more specifically BO can get along with.

tl;dr- No, board experience is not a make-or-break factor. I had basically zero experience voling so much as doing stuff like tabletop DMing when I got brought on so it would be hypocritical of me to claim it's necessary. There are some pass/fail questions mixed in to that list, but none of them are dependent on "prior experience."

Whoops, forgot I wasn't logged in.


 No.333745

>>333738

2.4% of the time in paternity suits involving multiple ovulation. To put this into perspective, the general rate for a non-paternity event is around 10% in general paternity suits. One fourth of the time a woman has multiple ova and has committed infidelity children can be born from different fathers despite simultaneous gestation. You are clearly wrong in assuming this is insignificant, especially considering that people who are poorer and younger have higher rates of non-paternity events, up to about 30% in unmarried blacks today. The vast majority of people throughout human evolution lived more like the former than modern people in developed nations; therefore we can extrapolate that it has had a more significant role in human evolution than we would expect based off of modern data. Moreover, you're falsely assuming female and male reproductive strategies are identical when they clearly aren't. Male mammals produce millions of sperm at a time and are in theory capable of fathering many children simultaneously without much investment afterwards, female mammals produce a small number of ova at a time and must invest significant amounts of energy into raising young to adulthood. While they don't directly benefit from infidelity beyond potentially having better genes for their offspring, the do benefit significantly from maximizing the amount of resources, either physical or social, they acquire from courtship in order to better raise their offspring, which often involves extra-pair copulation and manipulation of the uncertainty of paternity (this is probably why humans don't go into noticeable heat, for example). While this is more apparent in mammals and birds, literally only the jackdaw is known to not engage in this or similar behavior.


 No.333749

>>333743

Ah right, before I forget, I'm gonna close the application pool next Saturday night at midnight. We'll say Midnight Alaska time to keep it simple.


 No.333750

>>333745

>One fourth of the time a woman has multiple ova and has committed infidelity children can be born from different fathers despite simultaneous gestation.

And there are no multiple children involved but a single one with 2 different fathers, which is not practical at all, both with how low the probabilities of it happening are low and the fact that you still have to wait a 9 months for a single baby out of 2 fathers unlike the couple of women a man can impregnate PER DAY if not more considering the man's health, not to mention that there isn't any proof of it being able to accommodate more than one parent or the effects such thing could have with the offspring, while a single man impregnating multiple women can diverse the gen pool over time easily.

From a biological point of view, it's so rare with so little benefits and no more benefits being clear or proved that is not practical. From a social point of view it just makes you a slut, and only cucks like sluts, and those aren't pretty good genes.

>therefore we can extrapolate that it has had a more significant role in human evolution than we would expect based off of modern data

Shit speculations with no evidence or proof, only to justify your liking of sluts, cuck.

>the do benefit significantly from maximizing the amount of resources, either physical or social

And this is where it all comes from, you not being man enough to not only being able to provide for a single woman but for multiple ones, thus making your slut of a woman having to rely on multiple partners, which in all lights makes you the definition of a cuck.

So yeah, kill yourself, cuck.


 No.333754

>>333750

>no multiple children involved but a single one with 2 different fathers

Oh, so you don't even understand what heteropaternal superfecundation means. "Superfecundation" occurs when there are multiple, separate ova inside the female reproductive tract which are fertilized on separate occasions, typically resulting in multiple births; mosaicism is relatively rare in comparison. Might help your case if you bothered to look up terms you didn't understand as opposed to pretending that you did.

>speculations with no evidence or proof

>https://jech.bmj.com/content/59/9/749.long

>https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth

>you not being man enough to not only being able to provide for a single woman but for multiple ones, thus making your slut of a woman having to rely on multiple partners

I don't even have one. I'm not a nigger, and I'm still in education, so I really don't have any desire to start a family I can't support; but that's besides the point. Women, regardless of position, can gain from having multiple sex partners, and therefore have a motivation to perform acts of infidelity. Likewise, men can gain from raping every women they see. Just because they can doesn't mean they do.


 No.333759

File: c52002bfa0a3dae⋯.png (6.14 KB, 908x49, 908:49, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333754

>You can birth twins!

You still have to wait 9 months for another round, faggot. Still unpractical and you are still a cuck.

>Study with no definitive conclusion but still speculations is proof

>Study thas more the socioeconomic side than the biological side with little to no mention side effects of it

>While also acknowledging that they don't plan to prevent infidelity but it's consequences

Yeah, you're still a faggot and a huge cuck.

>and therefore have a motivation to perform acts of infidelity.

Even the study you posted said there's more to lose than to gain, so you are retarded and anyone who supports this behavior.

>men can gain from raping every women they see

Again, no, outside of the obvious social implications, you are just spreading your genes at random without any certainty of being able to provide for them or not. That, again, is far as practical and is as desperate as sluts.

Kill yourself, cuck.


 No.333766

>>333759

>Even though I'm wrong you still have to wait 9 months

>still only have the possibility to do it 20+ times

I'm not seeing the argument.

>risk factors for a certain result on a genetic test have nothing to do with biology because they aren't based on a genetic test but rather factors that increase the probability of a woman fucking more people

Nice reading comprehension, dipshit.

>I still don't understand conditionals

You might want to consider medication or a gas chamber.


 No.333768

Mods are retarded.

If you have sanity, >>>/sgg/ welcomes you.

That's all.


 No.333769

>>333766

>I'm not seeing the argument.

What about the fact that men can do it no problem with more women and more often? So there's no practical reason for a woman to wait 9 months to fuck different men than a man fucking different women every single day of his life. That's why harems makes more sense than reverse harems and you are a faggot.

>Nice reading comprehension

That IS exactly my point, retard.

>I justify sluts because I'm a cuck

You first.


 No.333772

>>333768

No one is ever going to go to your board to do anything but laugh at you. Christ, you actually put those banners up.


 No.333775

File: 49ee59879bb4c3c⋯.png (39.05 KB, 300x100, 3:1, ClipboardImage.png)

File: c402cfddd740298⋯.png (25 KB, 300x100, 3:1, ClipboardImage.png)

File: b73449dbd5af674⋯.png (74.43 KB, 300x100, 3:1, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 9835174e6160806⋯.png (81.15 KB, 300x100, 3:1, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d3213171f931822⋯.png (45.08 KB, 300x100, 3:1, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333768

Nobody cares about your shitty board, really.

But, if the BO allows me, I want to shill my own, that it's dead even though I've been wanting to post a doujin I read recently.

I also put a lot of effort in my banners and I can easily make more. Vols are free to use them here if they want.

https://8ch.net/hentaiclub/banners.html

>>333772

Yeah, he is retarded for the seeds of chaos one. But to be fair, the cream one is funny.


 No.333776

>>333775

Fuck, I forgot to actual redirect to the board

>>>/hentaiclub/


 No.333777

>>333769

>What about the fact that men can do it no problem with more women and more often

Since you seem to ignore reason when it doesn't agree with you, let me put it this way: how many men do you know that have had over 20 children with multiple women? As you don't seem to understand that a potential for something to happen isn't the same thing as that thing actually happening, the practical number of children men and women have is functionally identical in humans, with higher class men and lower class men being the extremes in both directions. Humans sexuality is not and has never been primarily polygamous; this is indicated by other indices such as the relative testicular mass between species which is demonstrated by other studies which you aren't intellectually capable of understanding, so I won't even bother.

>That IS exactly my point, I'm an utter fucking moron who can barely read, let alone understand basic scientific concepts

Well at least we can agree on something.


 No.333783

>>333777

>how many men do you know that have had over 20 children with multiple women?

>It doesn't happen so it's not practical!

>As you don't seem to understand that a potential for something to happen isn't the same thing as that thing actually happening

Gee, just like your shit argument.

>Humans sexuality is not and has never been primarily polygamous

I never said it was, did ? I said that it's more logical and practical in literally any way for men to do it and not women, starting with the fact that no matter how many parents a single kid or twins can have, you still have to wait 9 months for another batch, so women having multiple men AT ONCE instead of a man doing the same is retarded, not justifiable, and a shit fetish.

>Well at least we can agree on something.

So you agree you have reading comprehension and that you need to make shit up, goal move and ignore practicality and logic in order to justify your shit fetish?


 No.333790

>>333783

>just like your shit argument

I honestly don't think you've understood even a single statement in this entire exchange if you think that's a rebuttal for any portion of my argument.

>more logical and practical in literally any way for men to do it and not women

Which I've demonstrated is based on false assumptions, to which your response has been "cuck" and a fundamental misunderstanding of basic conditional statements.

>So you agree you have reading comprehension

Yes, I can read scientific papers, unlike you. I also don't assume anyone who calls me out for being a fucking retard has some fetish I dislike, consistently repeat criticisms levied at me against the people making them, and am actually capable of abstract reasoning. I imagine to someone who is as retarded as you are this probably seems like some type of fucking magic show, but this is well within the capacity of most of the human population.


 No.333794

>>333790

>if you think that's a rebuttal for any portion of my argument.

I'm pretty sure you are just playing the devil's advocate like a retard.

>Which I've demonstrated is based on false assumptions

You haven't. The fact that a woman have to wait nine months to be impregnated again while men don't need to wait even a fraction of that time to impregnate another woman is something you haven't proved to be false at all outside of your mental gymnastics about something that is not only irrelevant but impractical.

>I can read scientific papers, unlike you

An study is barely a fact when even then say the impact of it is inconclusive and merely speculations.

>I also don't assume anyone who calls me out for being a fucking retard has some fetish I dislike

>and am actually capable of abstract reasoning

So you're a fence sitter. Explains a lot.


 No.333795

File: 6fa7fca2085f0d8⋯.png (816.48 KB, 553x765, 553:765, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333790

Anon, this is where so many have fallen before you. You're finally starting to see that cuck-tan is just privy to certain higher truths, and no amount of your pitiful logic can shake her.


 No.333797

>>333795

>Everyone I don't like is the same person


 No.333798

>>333797

I love cuck-tan, and all her adherents. You're all so cute.


 No.333799

File: c6868bd431376a1⋯.jpeg (21.88 KB, 402x394, 201:197, c6868bd431376a1f06bb7f820….jpeg)

>>333798

>He finally acknowledges is not one person

Huh.


 No.333800

>>333794

>I'm pretty sure you are just playing the devil's advocate

I'm pretty sure you're retarded and your entire world view is based off of misunderstanding your secondary-public-school-level education.

>This one specific example is the only thing that matters to this argument and every other factor that's been presented doesn't matter at all

Fuck, you're dumb. Can you even tie your shoelaces by yourself?

>An study is barely a fact when even then say the impact of it is inconclusive and merely speculations

You really have no scientific literacy whatsoever. It's not even a study, it's a review.

>So you're a fence sitter.

I'm not a fence sitter, I just want you to fuck off and stop shitting up threads with your chromosomally-enriched misinterpretation of what cuckoldry is. I realize you desperately want to fit in, but different boards have different cultures, either make your own board or fucking lurk more and stop being such an autistic retard.


 No.333801

>>333800

>I'm pretty sure you're retarded and your entire world view is based off of misunderstanding your secondary-public-school-level education.

And yours is based on either being a contrarian or wanting to defend sluts for whatever reason, most likely being a cuck.

>This one specific example is the only thing that matters to this argument

It is, and you just strawmanned it by by bringing something completely irrelevant to the topic about the fact that a woman doesn't have any logical nor practical reason to want more than one partner, either biologically or societal. In fact, your own study proves that if shit like PD would be more mainstream it would be really hurtful to society because nobody likes sluts, except cucks.

>It's not even a study, it's a review.

Yeah, and it isn't a fact either.

>I just want you to fuck off and stop shitting up threads with your chromosomally-enriched misinterpretation of what cuckoldry is

But sadly, you are a cuck yourself that goes as far as defending sluts, wrongly so.

>I realize you desperately want to fit in, but different boards have different cultures

Pretty sure I fit in more here than you do, faggot. Specially since I don't go around defending either cuckolding or sluts.


 No.333802

>>333799

He? Who's the one making assumptions now? For instance, I'm not the one earlier up in the thread doing that. I must admit some fault here, this person clearly doesn't use the actual word "cuck" quite enough to be cuck-tan.


 No.333803

File: 2cf551e208d239c⋯.jpg (90.57 KB, 629x800, 629:800, df78d3771d0ecd3917dffd446a….jpg)

>>333802

>STOP ASSUMING MY IDENTITY!


 No.333804

It's funny that a new thread is made and cuck-tan started the exact same cycle over again. Once again he will eventually lose the argument to anyone who cares to respond to him and he'll fuck off until the next thread.

>>333802

Cuck-tan has demonstrated an ability to repress his constant urge to scream the word for a couple hours at a time.


 No.333805

>>333803

Pot, meet kettle.


 No.333806

>>333804

>Implying the discussion didn't last until the very last post of the last thread

Having selective memory is a bad thing, anon.


 No.333808

>>333801

>Pretty sure I fit in more here than you do, faggot

Textbook egocentrism. You get in an argument in every single thread you go to, at all times of the day. Literally not a single person has ever agreed with you, which you conceded last thread. How is that "fitting in" by anyone's definition?


 No.333809

>>333806

Oh, really? Which one of us has the selective memory of the last thread?

Because I remember you getting into a dozen different arguments, continuing them until you lost so hard not even your stupid ass could come up with a response, then refusing to ever respond to that argument again. You'd then start an argument with a different person. Or possibly the same person who just wants to kick the retard again.


 No.333811

>>333809

Gradually I began to hate them


 No.333815

>>333801

>the fact that a woman doesn't have any logical nor practical reason to want more than one partner, either biologically or societal

Except they do, which has been previously stated, you're response to the explanation was accusing me of stating it because of

>you not being man enough to not only being able to provide for a single woman but for multiple ones

like some 16 year old valley girl.

>still using study to refer to a review, but it it's not a fact except for the references to studies that have conclusions I like

The purpose of a review, you mongoloid, is to compile conclusions of studies on a particular topic in an easily accessible manner. And you still managed to get the wrong conclusions from that review, call its validity into question, and then selectively use sections to support your argument. Literally the reason I brought it up in the first place is because it demonstrates the correlation between PD and low socioeconomic status combined with the fact that for most of human history more people had lower socioeconomic status than they do now in order to support my claim that NPEs were probably more common in the past than they are now, which you said had no evidence. In short, you are completely retarded.

>Pretty sure I fit in more here than you do

Even if you did I still wouldn't give a fuck.


 No.333816

>>333808

>Everyone I don't like is the same person

Sounds like since there are so many people like me here, you probably don't belong here, and whether I fit or not, is irrelevant to the facts being discussed.


 No.333817

File: 47c91de83f634c8⋯.png (277.97 KB, 706x412, 353:206, 1424554395436.png)

>>333814

Why are some people on 8ch so obsessed with cuckchan? I haven't thought about that place since like 2015, but it seems like thoughts of it consume you.


 No.333818

>>333809

The last thread is still up, anon, care to point out where you were touched?


 No.333819

>>333816

>t-t-there's tons of people like me here

>i-i can't show even one case of anyone but me personally doing this, but trust me!

>e-everyone who doesn't post agrees with me

This is why some people don't believe you're being genuine. No one is actually this retarded, right?


 No.333820

>>333817

The place is complete cancer and every time a new controversy involving 8chan happens, a massive migration of edgy faggots that think "8chan is cuckchan but worse lol!" come here, dropping the post quality.

Recently the NZ shooting and the whole THQN AMA happened, so you see a lot of influx of retard trying to defend their shit fetishes, unaware of the fact that they are not welcomed here.


 No.333821

>>333819

Do you have any proof of them not being a lot of people, or you are just going to play the "no u" card?


 No.333823

>>333815

>Except they do, which has been previously stated

Oh, the one where you say the only reason they'd do it is money/power/sustainability because a single man is not enough? The one I shat on because it's still not practical at all because you'd still have a baby of a single one of those guys for at least 9 months and where cheating is still badly seen in society? Yeah, that one.

>Literally the reason I brought it up in the first place is because it demonstrates the correlation between PD and low socioeconomic status combined with the fact that for most of human history more people had lower socioeconomic status than they do now in order to support my claim that NPEs were probably more common in the past than they are now, which you said had no evidence

So your argument in short is that since niggers do it. This only makes it worse, in synthesis.

>Even if you did I still wouldn't give a fuck

At least you acknowledge that you don't.


 No.333824

>>333821

No, the only ""evidence"" I have is cuck-tan repeatedly admitting that it's all him.

But that could be fake, right? Because there's no proof about the identity of the people I'm replying to I should assume by default that each and every post in every single thread is a completely separate person, even when people explicitly state otherwise.


 No.333825

>>333817

>Why are some people on 8ch so obsessed with cuckchan?

This place was literally founded on butthurt re: cuckchan's moderation


 No.333826

File: 5df13d55d0c8973⋯.jpg (388.21 KB, 899x907, 899:907, 1442864678594.jpg)

>>333820

>>333822

Just sounds like you've made up some boogeyman in your head and now feel the need to attribute everything you dislike about the website to that boogeyman, rather than admitting that you share the board with people you dislike.


 No.333828

>>333824

Well, whoever that was, he was wrong.

I mean, I'm the one who did 9/11, anon. You just take my word.


 No.333829

>>333828

When he says things like it repeatedly over hundreds of posts of arguments it's reasonable to assume he's the same person, but as mentioned, it's actually unreasonable to begin with for me to assume that anyone has ever posted on this board more than once.


 No.333830

>>333826

Hardly. Cuckchanners would fed up with this place and leave. There's a reason why people say "you don't belong here". You can spot a cuckchanner even with their filename. And here is the thing, sure, there might be some crossposters here or there, but you should at least have the decency of hide the fact


 No.333831

>>333826

He's literally not wrong, though.

It's EXTREMELY unlikely that a large number of shitposters with the exact same posting style, mannerisms and bizarre behavior and beliefs cropped up out of nowhere a few months ago


 No.333832

>>333828

It's an honor, Mr. Bush.


 No.333833

>>333823

>cheating is still badly seen in society

Fuck, I forgot about all of those times when having mistresses who were married to someone else was considered shameful and inappropriate or how the Greeks and Romans detested Hercules, Castor, Pollux, and Aeneas because they were the products of female adultery.

>So your argument in short is that since niggers do it.

Niggers also breathe. It would make the world a better place if you stopped doing that, too.


 No.333834

>>333829

>Nobody is allowed to have a similar instance in an specific topic

>Otherwise they are the same person

Welp.

>>333832

I mean, I won the elections because, apparently, everyone who disagreed with me was one person.


 No.333835

>>333830

What are the inherent differences between someone who posts here and someone who posts on cuckchan?


 No.333837

>>333833

>I forgot about all of those times when having mistresses who were married to someone else was considered shameful and inappropriate

Glad we agree, then, cuck.

>because they were the products of female adultery.

Actually, yes, Zeus was feared, but it was generally seen as a fucking dick because of shit like that.

>Niggers also breathe

Niggers are not human. At least I know you will not breed, seeing how you are a cuck whose going to get a slut that will cheat on him, because, you know, it seems perfectly practical for a woman to do so when cucks are willing to comply.


 No.333838

>>333834

>i've been in this argument with someone for six hours now and they've continued posting in the exact same style and continue espousing the exact same beliefs

>should i assume it's the same person

>no that wouldn't make sense, clearly it's six dozen different people!!

>everyone who disagreed with me was one person

Stop saying that you inbred goblin. No one claims that everyone is the same person. We are saying that you in particular are the same person. Because you are literally the only person who has ever in the entire history of the board used your single-digit IQ definition of cuckoldry. With repeated prompting you couldn't even manage to point to a single post, even one that you made, and claim that it's an instance of someone else using your retarded definition.


 No.333839

>>333835

They usually use whatever is the hottest meme around, like the whole "OH NONONONO" that I didn't heard of till now. They also use Wojack variations to try to have their point go across. They act edgy disregarding the topic, just for the sake of being edgy because "lol so randum", and they usually have leftist/SJW mentality like "accept what is different even if it's literally shit", which is why you get retards with "STOP KINKSHAMING ME" that never was a problem here before except for a few instances really long ago, that were dealt with.

Overall, you can just go to cuckchan and check yourself and then make comparisons with some posts over there over posts over here, and realize crossposters are easily spotted.


 No.333840

>>333838

While the person you've been (pointlessly) arguing with is clearly one person, there are a few people across the board who've adopted that viewpoint. You can tell because, for instance, it crops up in threads that cuck-tan doesn't go to and in a few different posting styles.


 No.333841

File: b17d12f32658385⋯.png (8.69 KB, 286x139, 286:139, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333830

>You can spot a cuckchanner even with their filename

No, you can spot someone who used to browse cuckchan by their filename, it tells you nothing of their current habits. Are you telling me that you never browsed cuckchan, that posting here is literally your first imageboard ever?


 No.333842

>>333839

>and they usually have leftist/SJW mentality like "accept what is different even if it's literally shit", which is why you get retards with "STOP KINKSHAMING ME" that never was a problem here before except for a few instances really long ago, that were dealt with.

You actually had me going that you weren't cuck-tan up until this part


 No.333843

>>333840

Does it? There are other anti-NTR hardliners on the board and that's fine, the problem I have is with his utterly retarded definition of what cuckoldry is.

But fair enough, I accept that it's possible I just don't pay as much attention as you.


 No.333844

>>333838

>I'd been arguing with this person for a lot of time and losing

>It must be the person that shat on me before!

I mean, look at this faggot >>333842

He clearly isn't helping your case.


 No.333846

>>333841

I have old reaction pics from cuckchan as well, but, again, yes, it's pretty easy to spot which one is new and which one isn't, but you seem to be such a massive newfag that you don't know about them. It is impossible that you spent 4 years here without even realizing the hate this place have for cuckchan.


 No.333847

>>333839

I guess I'm different, because I don't do any of that.


 No.333848

>>333837

>it was generally seen as a fucking dick because of shit like that

You've got any evidence to back that up? Neither Venus nor Jupiter ever had negative consequences for repeatedly getting knocked up by other men despite being married or knocking up married women as far as I can recall, but I only studied the classics for four and a half years so maybe you could enlighten me.

>it seems perfectly practical for a woman to do so when cucks are willing to comply

Good to see that you still have no fucking understanding whatsoever of any statement in that entire exchange.


 No.333849

>>333847

Well, now that you admit to crosspost you can fuck off.


 No.333850

>>333844

I wouldn't really consider "shitposting so hard and being so universally hated board-wide that people gave you a name to mock you with" winning an argument


 No.333851

>>333844

>and losing

Oh come now, cuck-tan. Point at one argument you've one. Seriously, feel free to claim credit for any argument in your style that has actually won the argument.

Every single time it's just you screeching incoherently for a few hours while everyone else laughs at you, then you refuse to reply to them.


 No.333852


 No.333853

File: 72031bbe5f2329d⋯.png (188.65 KB, 495x568, 495:568, e27e232cad613eacacf72cae60….png)

>>333846

>you seem to be such a massive newfag that you don't know about them

What's the implication here, that newfags are incapable of knowing about Unix time? Do you realize how dumb that sounds?

>It is impossible that you spent 4 years here without even realizing the hate this place have for cuckchan

I've recognized it, but I've never understood it. I don't hate cuckchan. I had a lot of fun there back in the day, and it's disappointing to see its current state. It's more akin to pity than hatred, really.


 No.333854

>>333851

To be fair, does anyone ever win any of these?


 No.333855

File: 93fd6a23961b31f⋯.png (6.88 MB, 3100x6280, 155:314, 1466797690355-0.png)

>>333848

>You've got any evidence to back that up?

By extension, yes. In greece being a cuck was already bad. Just read ancient shitpost around pompeii. I'm not denying the fact that prostitution as a profession exists, but only pathetic faggots resort to it, outside of the other extreme where it's more to show off your money.

>Neither Venus nor Jupiter ever had negative consequences for repeatedly getting knocked up by other men despite being married or knocking up married women as far as I can recall, but I only studied the classics for four and a half years so maybe you could enlighten me.

Gee, why would the goddesses of fertility will not be shitted on for doing their jobs? Not to mention that, again as with Zeus, gods were generally feared, which is why mortals barely criticized their actions, but as with any shitty actions, just like in the french revolution, if it's shit no matter who does it, either kings or gods, people will shit on it.

>Good to see that you still have no fucking understanding

It's simple, anon, you are defending sluts.


 No.333858

File: 74dc7251dfe67da⋯.png (209.09 KB, 600x592, 75:74, ClipboardImage.png)

>In greece being a cuck was already bad. Just read ancient shitpost around pompeii.


 No.333859

>>333853

>that newfags are incapable of knowing about Unix time? Do you realize how dumb that sounds?

Actually, yes, back in /v/ I've seen plenty of newfags being clueless as to why they were being called cuckchanners while posting reaction pics that started with 15. So it does happen.

>It's more akin to pity than hatred, really.

They are not mutually exclusive. The main grasp people have to hate cuckchan is that they don't want 8chan to become the site cuckchan is today, regardless of anything previous to 2015.


 No.333860

File: 74d4e1641b6d3c2⋯.png (544.11 KB, 900x851, 900:851, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333858

My point stand still.


 No.333861

File: 616cbe06bab1d20⋯.jpg (255.42 KB, 1321x1782, 1321:1782, heretostay.jpg)

>>333854

It happens occasionally, but very rarely. Sometimes there'll be an argument back and forth, ending with a concession on one side. It really just depends on the goal when the argument starts.

Cuck-tan has mentioned before though that anyone who admits they have lost is a cuck, so obviously he would never publicly admit to losing an argument in any capacity.


 No.333862

>>333854

Not really.

Cuck-tan tries and fails to push her beliefs on the board or "popularize" them and gets her IP banned, everyone else ridicules her but she's past the autism threshold for caring about that so it all starts again in a few hours.


 No.333863

>>333850

>A few faggots force a meme

>lol board wide

Heh

>>333851

Check the last few posts of the previous meta thread fag.

>>333861

>>333862

Seeing how there's more and more people with this belief in the board, I'd say cuck-tan is winning. And it makes sense, regardless of your stance on the topic, NTR is generally despised.


 No.333864

>>333855

>In greece being a cuck was already bad. Just read ancient shitpost around pompeii

Pompeii is in Italy and basically had a reputation as the Roman equivalent of Vegas. In contrast, a shit ton of prominent Romans, including Julius Caesar, Augustus (though he had her divorce her husband and marry him), Catullus, and Ovid were publicly known to have had sex with women who were married to other men. Having your wife be unfaithful was considered dishonorable for the husband, not necessarily for the wife; hence mater semper certa est, pater numquam.

>Gee, why would the goddesses of fertility will not be shitted on for "doing their jobs"

Well Gilgamesh did it, for one.


 No.333865

>>333863

>NTR is generally despised

See >>333843

Everyone agrees that NTR is shit, you absolute mongoloid. We disagree with your absurdly expansive definition of what "cuck" means.


 No.333867

>>333864

>Pompeii is in Italy and basically had a reputation as the Roman equivalent of Vegas.

And yet there's people that hate cuckolding and whores there.

>a shit ton of prominent Romans

Yeah, because they had power of money were able to do so, in contrast to the peasants that did hate cuckolding.

>Having your wife be unfaithful was considered dishonorable for the husband, not necessarily for the wife

Same shit. Again, only a cuck would have liked used goods, just like Julius Caesar, and you know why.

>Well Gilgamesh did it, for one.

Exactly.


 No.333868

File: a555601f531f0d9⋯.png (3.24 MB, 1600x2142, 800:1071, ClipboardImage.png)

>>333865

>We disagree with your absurdly expansive definition of what "cuck" means.

Except it isn't mine. Or are you telling me I did this too?


 No.333871

I'm very confused as to why you all are arguing over semantics about a topic you already fundamentally hate.


 No.333873

>>333863

I think my favorite thing about you is you're at least cognizant of dialectical tactics. You're leveraging anonymity to try to put reasonable doubt in lurkers' minds that you're just one samefag (unfortunately your beliefs are so jarring and bizarre that it's mostly unbelievable), something that can't be disproven and requires having interacted with you for a while to recognize. You're pretty good at deflecting (drawing out a point that's pretty clear-cut against you with fucktons of minor points that confuses the issue) and arguing from incredulity, so good that I'd wager you were one of those "meme war" twitter propagandists who got bored because there was nothing to fight for any more and you were still a NEET with time on your hands. It would be impressive, if you weren't too autistic to realize the content of the message you were trying to push doesn't appeal to anyone here.


 No.333874

>>333868

That's literally a joke, anon.

>>333871

Because cuck-tan has spent months at this point aggressively shitposting almost non-stop. When he first started only people who like NTR argued with him, but he has been at it for so long with his stupid fucking definition of what a "cuck" is that he has earned the antipathy of the entire board regardless of their opinions on NTR.

That's why he's had repeated accusations against him of being a false flag attack.


 No.333875

>>333871

This.

>>333873

I've never done any of this, so thanks. I never used Twitter, though, so your assumption is as accurate as your intelligence.


 No.333876

>>333874

>That's literally a joke, anon

Hardly, specially when it is true.

>The same person have been shitposting non-stop for months

I don't know what is more pathetic, that person if that was true, or anyone who believes that is even possible.

>I hate this guy so everyone must hate him too

Sometimes I wonder if people like you have been using imageboards for more than a couple of months.


 No.333877

>>333867

>the peasants that did hate cuckolding

Augustus was so popular he was still worshiped by some peasants after Christianization, yet he would be a cuck by your definition. Julius Caesar was popular enough to end the fucking Republic. Historical reality does not match your interpretation.

>Exactly.

What the fuck do you even mean?


 No.333878

>>333871

Because anon, literally every single game on this board except Honey Select is cuckshit according to cuck-tan.

Every. Single. One.

I fucking hate NTR but I can't get behind the idea that we need to purge every single game from this board based off of one retard's misunderstanding of terms.


 No.333879

>>333875

Here I am pouring my heart out and you can't even break kayfabe for one minute to give me a "thank you"?

That's it, all my cuck-tan merch is going in the garbage can.


 No.333881

>>333876

>I don't know what is more pathetic, that person if that was true, or anyone who believes that is even possible.

You literally admitted it, cuck-tan. Several times. I don't know why you bother with this whole song and dance when you just abandon it in the heat of an argument.

>I hate this guy so everyone must hate him too

Oh, we're going to do this again? Alright, cuck-tan, point to anyone on this board agreeing with you. Not just being anti-NTR, because 90% of this board is anti-NTR, you need to find someone who agrees with your specific definition of cuckoldry.

Don't worry, I'll wait.


 No.333883

>>333875

>I've never done any of this

No, he's literally describing precisely what you were doing in the post he replied to. You can't just say you didn't do something that is clearly evident to everyone in that exact post. You can deny the conjecture afterwards, but it's asinine to claim you didn't do any of it.


 No.333884

>>333877

>Augustus was so popular he was still worshiped by some peasants after Christianization

And he wasn't worshiped exactly because he was a cuck, faggot.

>What the fuck do you even mean?

That people shit on authoritative figures, regardless, even if just for one detail. Push the detail enough and people piss off, like literal faggots in rome.


 No.333886

>>333884

>he was worshiped

>therefore he wasn't worshiped

Not even him, but how the fuck do you get this backwards in logic? X, therefore notX?


 No.333887

>>333814

>How the fuck do you get to unironically say you "dab on" people, do the whole cancer that is currently infesting cuckchan with his "OH NONONONO" and STILL not catch a ban?

Because it's the meta thread, anon. If this were any other thread they would be shat on/banned under rule 0, but that's allowed here.


 No.333888

>>333878

>except Honey Select

Except that's wrong. Honey Select is about a fucking brother. How is that not cuckshit? Only good thing about honey select is the character creator and nothing more. In comparison, Koikatu in both storyline and aesthetic is way better. Dunno with what faggot you argued before, but you won't believe me when I tell you I'm not him, so I'm just going to tell you to go and kill yourself, cuck.

>I fucking hate NTR but I can't get behind the idea that we need to purge every single game from this board based off of one retard's misunderstanding of terms.

It's simple

>If anyone other than the MC fucks a woman then it's cuckshit

And even then, I'm not asking for those games to be purged, but it's really fucking logical why they get shit on, and I'm willing to bet is not a single person based on whatever you may believe about Honey Select.

>>333881

>Everyone I don't like is the same person

I'm certain you come from cuckchan, seeing how you try to force a shitty meme.

>point to anyone on this board agreeing with you

You do realize you are on an anonymous imageboard, right, newfag?


 No.333889

File: 45f5d34083f5de5⋯.png (122.6 KB, 300x300, 1:1, 0c1b2e71d314d2a744ed8cb636….png)

>>333886

It makes you wonder the kind of faggots you share the board with, though. It's disgusting.


 No.333890


 No.333891

>>333884

>he wasn't worshiped exactly because he was a cuck

>the peasants hated cukolding

>but they worshiped a cuck for three centuries

Wew.

>Authority figure shits on another authority figure

>this is somehow significant


 No.333892

>>333888

>>Everyone I don't like is the same person

>a specific instance is the rule

That's not how it works, you utter retard.

>You do realize you are on an anonymous imageboard

You frequently cast doubt over whether or not it's you arguing in every thread (despite at other times admitting it is you), but you're not even willing to point at one of your own posts and say "see? that one's definitely someone else!"

Come on now, cuck-tan. How is anyone going to take you seriously if you aren't even willing to put in the effort?


 No.333893

>>333883

But I haven't.

>>333886

You're telling me that the people who worship the Pope also worship him for his allegedly cover of pedophilia in the Vatican? So people aren't allowed to worship a single aspect of an authoritative figure but his whole life as if it was a cult? Are you retarded?


 No.333894


 No.333896

>>333888

>If anyone other than the MC fucks a woman then it's cuckshit

This is the definition that only you have ever used, anon.

It just gets so damn tiring to deal with you.

Why do you bother? According to your own definition, everything on this board is cuckshit. In your mind, this place is no better than Fag95zone. Why bother coming to what you believe is a hive of literally nothing but cuckshit?

Go create another board that is "cuck-free" by your definition.


 No.333898

>>333892

>a specific instance is the rule

Then you might as well just go case by case instead of pushing a shit meme with little to no proof.

>despite at other times admitting it is you

Have you ever considered that anyone can try to be cuck-tan to either support her or shit on her? Nah, it's so unlikely that anyone would do that in an anonymous imageboard. Trust me, I'm fire tires, I came back to tell you this.

EDIT: Removed Namefagging/applied 8 hour ban.

Post last edited at

 No.333899

>>333893

>So people aren't allowed to worship a single aspect of an authoritative figure but his whole life as if it was a cult? Are you retarded?

That's literally how deification works though. You might want to read apocolocyntosis, or just look at Islam. The pope isn't worshiped as a deity, Augustus was.


 No.333900

>>333896

>This is the definition that only you have ever used, anon.

Hardly, seeing how I'm now "cuck-tan".

>In your mind, this place is no better than Fag95zone

Not quite, first, there's evidently more people that hates NTR as much as I do here unlike Fag95 or cuckchan. Secondly, there are plenty of non NTR games here, and finally, even if there were a lot of NTR games, I'm still free to shit on them.

And now I actually have a question, if you actually hate NTR, why do you get so upset when anyone shits on NTR? If you don't think that's the definition of NTR you can just ignore it, but from what I can see, it feels more like you feel personally attacked by people shitting on NTR, because, in all lights, you seem to like NTR. And here is the thing, I don't proof for it other than you being adamant about defending it when otherwise you wouldn't care.

EDIT: Removed namefagging/applied 8 hour ban.

Post last edited at

 No.333901

>>333899

So were kings and queens and look at the french revolution, faggot. There's a limit at how much shit humans are able to take. The only reason Augustus was worshiped is because he was seen as a good leader.


 No.333902

>>333876

>I don't know what is more pathetic, that person if that was true, or anyone who believes that is even possible.

I can confirm Cuck-tan's existence. In the previous meta thread she even stated that she swaps IPs around after getting the [B&D+] treatment for constant shitposting over several weeks.

Unfortunately, the anon that anon has been fighting with actually isn't cuck-tan for once. It's a different anon (who is admittedly also a cross-boarder going through their history).


 No.333903

>>333900

>If you actually hate NTR, why do you get so upset when anyone shits on NTR

I'm not the person who's responding to you, but if you permit someone to be a retard just because they agree with you it reflects poorly on your side of the argument.

>>333901

>"Divine right monarchy" is the same thing as deification

>good leadership is the only qualification for deification

You really have no idea what you're talking about.


 No.333905

>>333900

>there's evidently more people that hates NTR as much as I do

Yes, that's precisely what I'm saying. Everyone universally dislikes NTR on this board, yet people still disagree with you in particular. Use your pattern recognition to analyze why the board at large can shit on NTR while simultaneously hating you.

>if you actually hate NTR, why do you get so upset when anyone shits on NTR?

I don't. I get annoyed when someone uses your particularly retarded arguments.

>If you don't think that's the definition of NTR you can just ignore it,

The problem is that you have kept this up for months. It's so goddamn tiring. I didn't argue the first time you started a shitstorm in a random thread. I didn't even argue with you the tenth time you started a shitstorm. It just gets so tiring dealing with it so often.

>>333902

>It's a different anon (who is admittedly also a cross-boarder going through their history).

The problem is that VPNs exist, which muddy the water with those kinds of things. For example, I use PrivateInternetAccess as my VPN and it auto-connects me to Silicon Valley. That's the same VPN and node that Viperfag uses, so occasionally I get caught by bans he was hit with. I also often just don't have to enter a captcha when I try to post the first time in a day, meaning that someone else is currently active with that same IP.

Though I suppose general posting style is an indicator as well, but that further muddies the water because not everyone posts the same at all times.


 No.333907

>>333902

Can confirm. I have been busy so I have not been able to post anymore. But I'm glad faggots made a boogeyman out of me.


 No.333963

>>333775

>But, if the BO allows me, I want to shill my own, that it's dead even though I've been wanting to post a doujin I read recently.

Sure go ahead and I way say post it any way.

What do you think about merging the two boards or >>>/hgg/ outright absorbing your board? If that is the case then you are more than welcome to be a vol/co-BO if you want. Either way I have added your board to the announcement bar.

>I also put a lot of effort in my banners and I can easily make more. Vols are free to use them here if they want.

Thanks, the five you have posted have been added (only because of how minimal the upload tool is).


 No.334126

>>333963

I'm not sure what you're thinking, but you need to seriously rethink this post

>letting /sgg/ shill

fine, I guess. if someone wants their furry/cuck games that badly, /sgg/ can act as containment.

>absorbing /sgg/

have you fucking looked at /sgg/?

there's nothing there to absorb

>giving /sgg/ BO vol position on /hgg/ when /sgg/ was created less than a month ago and purely as a way to bitch about /hgg/ moderation

what the fuck are you smoking?


 No.334128

>>334126

He means /hentaiclub/, you fucking illiterate troglodyte.


 No.334141

>>334128

my bad, but it's still an empty board.

how the hell would "absorbing" it benefit us?

why should the owner of a board that tiny get any kind of special treatment like automatic vol status?


 No.334143

File: d211831b0d5f9d7⋯.jpg (141.25 KB, 464x464, 1:1, da2b5527aef8377ee66d3a8e96….jpg)

>>334141

It would give /hgg/ an excuse to be bigger tent and include hentai in addition to H-games and westernshit (and maybe set us back on the correct path of being HENTAI games general). It's mutually beneficial.


 No.334144

>>334143

If we make the merger, I suggest making it "allow hentai general and scanlations initially to have threads, and allow specific mangakas to have threads if this works out in a few months." Also a strict ban on western comics unless it's in the hentai general.


 No.334145

>>334141

BO is looking for vols. Makes sense for me.


 No.334148

>>334143

Why would we want a "bigger tent"? What does any of that have to do with h-games?


 No.334155

>>334143

>hentai games general

>>334148

exactly

>>334145

If BO wants more vols that's okay, but I don't want some other no-name BO being given vol status just because.

If he goes through the same application process any other vol does and gets approved, then I'm fine with that.

What really bugged me was offering co-BO status to somebody we don't know from adam.

What the fuck, BO?


 No.334158

>>334155

You do know someone saying "hey, I do X/Y/Z and have a vested interest in this board" is how NotCIA and Veil were brought on, right? Dunno about Oilrig's circumstances. In fact NotCIA is the only one pushing for this application process I think.


 No.334162

>>334143

>>334144

>>334148

>>334155

I assume it's a "Reeee! The West is cucked! We must rely on Japan for everything!" weeb sentiment.


 No.334178

File: 5321841420f6daa⋯.gif (160.13 KB, 800x450, 16:9, 5321841420f6daae442b227a6b….gif)

>>334155

>hentai games general

<NOT porn games general

Two can play that game, fucking nigger. We allowed your westernshit, so you can at least be conscientious about it in allowing hentai (again, I'm shilling for a hentai/sad panda general and scanlation groups who want to use our board).


 No.334179

>>334178

As long as it doesn't become an stupid dump and there's at least a bit of discussion, that'd be nice. If the thread is made, /hentaiclub/ could be in the OP.


 No.334180

>>334179

That was my thought process, yeah. I think the last thing anyone wants is to have a dozen separate hentai threads dumped on what's generally a porn game board.


 No.334278

On the topic of furry.

>Humans with superficial animal characteristics are okay

I've some thoughts about this.

Monster Girls tend to have animalistic traits that enhance or hinder them in some way. Like a Wolf Girl looking like a regular girl but with wolf ears and tail, but still having the improved sense of smell attributed to wolves and the like.

On the flip side, CoC is fairly rare in the realm of furry. I've delved into that abyss before. It was research I swear. Don't judge me too harshly.

Furries tend to be very sensitive. By that I mean they are thin skinned freaks that very quickly feel emasculated. They suffer an inferiority complex. So, to cater to these freaks, most furry content tends to have as little emphasis on the animalistic parts as possible, as paradoxical as that sounds.

That is why a sizable chunk of furshit has outrageous proportions or weird biology that never gets addressed or even noticed, with grossly oversized genitals or tits not even disturbing the way they walk, or no one even mentioning why someone's pussy is literally glowing for seemingly no reason. Basically, most furries are that one kid that insists that a parakeet could totally beat a lion in a fight, and generally won't shut up about parakeets. To keep their shilling dispensers from getting upset with them, most who make furry content just never bring up how one animal is obviously better or the best at something.

It still happens, but I've found Monster Girls actually utilize their animal sides more often than furries, so I think that definition could use some work as it would actually allow more furry stuff than Monster Girls.


 No.334281

File: 8f23bec6dc70ff3⋯.png (326.75 KB, 542x619, 542:619, 8f2.png)

>>334278

Damn, forgot the image.


 No.334287

File: 9c9d73a2a2a0671⋯.gif (421.57 KB, 640x480, 4:3, 1450003846748.gif)

>>333963

Thanks for replying, mate. How exactly would the merging works? I've read some of the posts about it and I like the idea of the hentai general with the redirection to >>>/hentaiclub/.

As for being a vol, I'd love it, but the truth is I'm busy and I don't have access to my PC all the time, let alone a PC otherwise. So sorry, I have to decline.


 No.334329

>>334278

What are you smoking? I haven't read extensive amounts of furry porn like you evidently have so I'll have to accept that your interpretation of it is correct, but even with that you're being dumb.

>b-but the author doesn't actively point out how dumb a zebra with ZZ cup tits are!

Doesn't fucking matter in terms of the rules, it's a zebra. Doesn't matter if the fact that the girl is a zebra is only mentioned once, she's still a goddamn zebra.

If it's not a zebra and instead just a girl with horse ears, it's not furry, it's kemonomimi. Pretty fucking easy to figure out.


 No.334350

>>334155

>What the fuck, BO?

It made sense for me to ask him up front now rather than once the merging process was complete. I personally find it only fair to offer him equal say in how the hypothetical combined board would have been moderated.

>>334158

>In fact NotCIA is the only one pushing for this application process I think.

Last week I sent a unloaded PM to the rest of the team, asking for their thought's on 'if it was time to bring in more vol's'.

>>334287

>How exactly would the merging works? I've read some of the posts about it and I like the idea of the hentai general with the redirection to >>>/hentaiclub/.

My initial idea was simply that I updated the title and subtitle (tags,etc) then your topic has a dedicated thread, finally >>>/hentaiclub/ would be deleted after any desired importing. However in hind sight it is not very fair and board's can not be deleted by anyone but Ron on an individual case. So now I agree the redirection idea is a good one.

>So sorry, I have to decline.

Fair enough.


 No.334672

>>334350

>only fair

Why? How is that fair?

If the two boards were equal size, that might be fair, but that board has like six threads or something grand total probably for its entire lifetime.

It's like the king of some decent sized country offering to marry the ruler of a tiny pacific island kingdom with like 300 population total and giving them equal rulership.

It simply doesn't make any sense.

>>334329

You're missing the point. The point is that furry material doesn't take like rabbit x zebra-taur and spend the entire time talking about the uniquely interesting ways they have to mate due to their differing physiognomy, instead furry material mentions in passing that it's a rabbit and a zebra, then it gives them both two foot horse cocks, Q cup tits, and balls the size of watermelons, and then writes a bunch of thinly veiled gay sex focusing entirely on those oversized sexual characteristics.


 No.334673

>>334178

>hentai, not doujins or manga

You want to split hairs, let's split hairs.

The board's name is "[perverse/perverted] games general" and strictly has nothing to do with any non-game medium in the slightest.


 No.334674

>>334329

>it's not furry, it's kemonomimi.

No no no. That isn't my point at all. I'm pointing out how, in a lengthy discussion, it was said that animal traits were fine as long as they were superficial cosmetic shit. Here is the exact quote.

> "Superficial" would mean that it is either purely aesthetic (eg. cat ears and a tail) or induces the character to affect silly mannerisms (eg. interspersing speech with "meow"). Once the animalistic feature significantly either impares or enhances the character's abilities it ceases to be "superficial."

For all intents and purposes, this more commonly includes furry. This is because monster girls are more likely to be enhanced by their animalistic traits in some way, while the furries could easily be argued as just humans that are completely covered by purely aesthetic animalistic features.

I agree with the notion, but I think we need a better definition to work with.


 No.334680

>>334673

Perverse is a genre, idiot. Do you know how Japanese language works?


 No.334682

>>334672

What would the board lose if the merge happens? In your analogy, is more like the king tells his son to marry that queen in order to obtain more territory. And not even close since he'd lose his son, unlike here.


 No.334699

>>334680

> In the Japanese language, however, "hentai" is not a genre of media but any type of perverse or bizarre sexual desire or act.

Better than you, apparently.


 No.334734

>>333228

Cucks are like muslims. If they'd fuck off we wouldn't keep having to tell them to fuck off.


 No.334753

>>334734

What cucks? All I see is idiots calling eachother cucks.


 No.334864

>>334722

Exactly.

It's insulting.

I'm disappointed in you, BO-senpai.


 No.334865

>>334831

wew lad


 No.334866

>>334722

Your analogy is still off. There is no son involved. It's more like if the king went to some poor land, and decided to bring the guy living there to the court to expand the land as small as it could be.

The reason I made that board is because I wanted something different. All porn related boards are just senseless dumps that kill any kind of discussion for the art or the artist since any sensible post is buried in hundreds of dumps. Not to mention that there are already a lot of porn boards.

I don't know why the BO liked the idea, but I'm really passionate towards doujinshis, they can have a great story, great art, and you barely see anyone talking about it. If it was as easy as just making a shit board and shilling it, the guy who made gay hgg would be a vol by now.

Sure, my board is not popular, but I genuinely care for it's content. I already rejected the vol status because I don't have enough time, which is why I barely post in my own board despite having a list of artisartists and doujins I want to explore.


 No.334869

>>334866

Yeah, but you don't suddenly make that hick a baron or something.


 No.334871

>>334869

I think you overestimate what being a vol means. Specially if you don't post as such often, like any of the vols in this board do, and don't abuse your power.


 No.334875

>>334871

vol, sure. co-BO is a different story.


 No.334876

>>334875

Pretty sure the BO meant I was just going to be another vol.


 No.334881

>>334876

He mentioned both. And vols aren't god so I don't mind that, you seem like an okay guy. I just like to think that if he was going to offer co-BO to anyone it would be an existing mod or something. I'm just not sure what he was thinking with that part.


 No.334892

>>334864

Nah, fuck you. BO did nothing wrong. This is a fucking imageboard, learn to take it easy. It's not like Jim giving /fit/ to a redditor or something extreme like that.


 No.334893

>>334881

I don't think he meant this board but mine with that, or that's how I get it.


 No.335411

File: 5d36dae54b795b6⋯.jpg (181.7 KB, 2508x1649, 2508:1649, 5d36dae54b795b6b6ce4b69fc3….jpg)

Was gonna just ban the TiTS thread, but anon unironically used emojis and admitted to being a furfag so I gave it the [B&D] treatment. 8chan shit the bed when I banned him/it made it a permaban, so I had to unban and reapply the ban using a different post he made in a different thread, in case anyone checks the board logs and is wondering what the fuck.


 No.335462

File: 0cb9e95f9cf5323⋯.jpg (1.2 MB, 2000x1297, 2000:1297, Bored tomoko with headset ….jpg)

>>335411

>tfw theres no way for TITs to go the same way as CoC

>tfw TITS will never be completed, and even if it did it would likely go the same way as kingdom come deliverance

>tfw you can't even discuss TiTs modding in its own thread here because there isnt enough de-fur modding to the game as is

>tfw CoC was only defurred as thoroughly as it was due to being here in the first case.

>tfw you were counting on some of the anons to actually fix it up and make it playable as well as add the incest back in ESPECIALLY ADD INCEST BACK IN

Vita sic est


 No.335464

File: d49a5abbf03b7c7⋯.png (101.91 KB, 400x436, 100:109, 1554360211382.png)

>>335462

it hurts


 No.335526

File: 89dda76cab16aa6⋯.png (50.07 KB, 174x187, 174:187, 1424112363350.png)

>>335411

>anon unironically used emojis and admitted to being a furfag

oh. I wanted to complain about the game some more


 No.335535

>>335462

CoC started out as a demon/monster-girl game with furry on the side, and degraded into full on furry when the furrybucks started to flow in. On the contrary you have TiTS, which has been a game catering solely to furries right from the start. As such, CoC can be cleaned up to a degree to make it what it was always intended to be, while TiTS is furry through and through.

As such, I have no intention to unlike CoC ever work on TiTS, not to mention that the gameplay and movement is shallow as fuck.


 No.335547

>>335462

>>335526

The thread wasn't banned, just the anon. That's what was being clarified.


 No.335607

File: 97ec55a0967ebf7⋯.jpg (105.58 KB, 524x1009, 524:1009, rage feels hate anger.jpg)

>>335535

>On the contrary you have TiTS, which has been a game catering solely to furries right from the start.

It was never supposed to be a furry game, it was supposed to be an alien game which everyone wanted. But instead it just got filled with furry shit from the start and became COC 2: electric Boogaloo, Furries in space edition

I wanted Alien shit, but instead i got furry shit

Like less than 5% of the NPCs in the game can even be considered alien, the rest are pretty much furry

I would have even preferred elves in space over this garbage, albeit there is an elf store vendor.


 No.335613

>>334831

Actually, if furries and cucks made their own country and all moved there, it would be so much easier to genocide them because we'd know where they are.


 No.335708

>>335613

In a straight-up war between furries and cucks on one side and /pol/ on the other, I would lay money on the first group kicking the shit out of the second group. Cucks are supposedly already genociding the 56%, and furries have shitloads of disposable income. All /pol/ has going for it is mass shooters, which don't amount to much when the other side is also armed. Whatever the outcome, the viewing public would be the winners. They could put that shit on pay-per-view.


 No.335755

>>335708

>/pol/

>mass shooters

wew


 No.335757

File: fd5447fd3a996e5⋯.jpg (116.48 KB, 1024x730, 512:365, truth.jpg)

>>335613

They already have their own country. The US is owned, run, and occupied by furries and closet furries from coast to coast, and ruled by their dictatorial fur-god Donald Trump, who is openly furry. Don't expect the mainstream media to report on this. But all is well, the great Redeemer of Russia, incarnation of Christ reborn, purist and Western garbage incinerator Vladamir Putin is playing his hand to end the fur-loving West as sure as the son will set. Perhaps you will survive?


 No.335764

>>335755

Oh, right. I forgot that they were secretly jewish cultural marxist falseflags who wanted to smear /pol/'s good name by spouting /pol/ memes before doing exactly the kind of shit that /pol/ always says it wants to do. Damn those impossibly brilliant and supremely capable untermenschen and their 4D chess! I gotta say, though, that newsman reading Navy SEAL copypasta gave me a giggle.


 No.335766

File: 6a6af67047b0084⋯.png (422.12 KB, 469x372, 469:372, IDon'tBelieveIt.png)

>>335757

mfw the yarmulke that Trump wore to the Western Wall was actually the inner lining of his fursuit's headpiece


 No.335771

File: e97a0667cfe2be0⋯.jpg (42.22 KB, 620x394, 310:197, subscribe to pewdiepie.jpg)

>>335755

Anon…


 No.335773

>>332871

>>Can I make a thread about X?

>You can make a thread about anything really so long as it follows the OP quality rule

Yeah, you probably should point out right there, that you can't post stuff that BO doesn't like (like cuckfaggatory, furries [unless it's the particular kind of furry content that BO enjoys like CoC]) instead of on the bottom of OP.

Just for the sake of clarity.

And speaking of it: when are you going to update https://8ch.net/hgg/rules.html ?


 No.335774

File: eb370ec7a68ab5a⋯.jpg (27.61 KB, 481x333, 13:9, 23915596.jpg)

>>335773

>Being this butthurt


 No.335775

>>335774

Well, as it is now, I wouldn't be surprised if more people would accidentally make some threads about furry games: rules aren't updated yet and OP literally says that anything goes.

The only mention of this change is a small footnote on the bottom of meta thread.

Are you really too dense to see the problem here?


 No.335780

File: 8817d6652940be3⋯.jpg (35.63 KB, 554x439, 554:439, 1429221290706-0.jpg)

>>335775

If they do, they can get clarification here. If they don't like it, they can fuck off.


 No.335805

>>335774

>nah, there's no reason to clarify rules at all!

>and anyone who don't like it can just fuck off!

I'm really not sure are you retarded or just shitposting.


 No.335958

>>335805

I'm not saying rules doesn't need to be clarified, I'm saying that they are common sense. If you break them, you don't belong here.


 No.336006

File: dcc7e31ef42566b⋯.gif (192.43 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, stars.gif)

In my opinion, the decision to ban certain kinds of content is the first step on a slippery slope towards puritanism, which is antithetical to the very notion of adult videogames. It is no better than Paypal willy-nilly deciding that incest is not allowed, or videogames banning certain playstyles because they do not fit the developers' vision. It is a dangerous precedent to set. What is to say that rape or feet or lolicon won't be next?

You may collectively run your board however you wish, and I will naturally comply with this new regulation. No new Kobold Adventure threads will be made, despite the fact that a lot of people found the game through this board, and that feedback from the people here has lead to the game itself improving. It's a shame that this has to come to an end, because someone else did something unrelated, that the moderation does not agree with, but so be it.

I hope for this board's sake that you collectively picked the right choice of actions in enacting the ban, and that this decision will end up benefitting the board in the long run, instead of causing it to spiral downwards into further restrictions of what may and may not be discussed. Thank you for the time that Kobold Adventure has spent here so far, and for however long it may take for the current thread to reach the bump limit (probably half a year or something). After that, there will be one fewer place on the internet, where my videogame can be discussed.


 No.336009

>>336006

Except that it's been plainly stated that existing generals won't be banned, you colossal faggot.


 No.336019

>>336006

Will you be moving the game to a new board?


 No.336020

>>336019

Probably /fur/ or something. We'll see when the thread itself gets closer to bump limit.


 No.336028

File: b28babaa13b7dbf⋯.png (765.02 KB, 1278x720, 71:40, b28babaa13b7dbfb92d271ee0a….png)

>>336006

>What is to say that rape or feet or lolicon won't be next?

The fact that at least three of the vols are lolicons, one of them was involved with writing a rape h-game back in the day, and I'm pretty sure one of them is a foot fag? The cuck thing and the fur thing have been a very long time coming, it just finally spiraled out of control. I can't even comprehend how anons can't see the difference between those two very vocal very minor communities that cause 90% of the drama, and the rest of the range of fetishes (that I find disgusting but have no intention of going after). Even the vol response in regards to the fur thing has been more or less "we're only gonna enforce it in extreme cases" for the most part. The thread that started it only got that treatment and started that mess because OP admitted to basically raiding /hgg/ and wanting to use it as a launch pad to post other furry games.

>Kobold Adventures is leaving

Never played it, but it was already discussed and Kobold Adventures was in the clear, so you're always welcome to come back, dude.

>After that, there will be one fewer place on the internet, where my videogame can be discussed.

I'm not sure if you were around when that one Nip was throwing DMCAs around and we added a magnet link of his game to the announcement page section, but if anons want a Kobold Adventure thread, anons will make a new Kobold Adventure thread. You might stop browsing and there's nothing stopping you from doing so, I won't hold that against you, but it's not gonna stop anons from discussing your game.


 No.336031

>>336028

>two very vocal very minor communities that cause 90% of the drama

Oh, please. It is plain as day that /pol/ causes 90% of the drama. The furries are annoying, but there has been nothing unexpected out of them. The cucks don't even seem to be real, just a paranoid fantasy. Whatever. It's you guys' board. You do what you want to it.


 No.336032

>>336028

>Kobold Adventures was in the clear

I do not understand the reasoning for this. My game is 100%, undeniably, irrefutably furry. I have never claimed it *not* to be furry. There's a fox lady, a wolf guy, a sheep, a bunch of anthropomorphic dragons, a rat, an owl guy, and a scaly protagonist, a bunch of which already have art drawn by furry artists. The character sheets page alone, should tell you all you need to know about the nature of the beast.

http://koboldadventure.com/charsheet/index.html

I'm not going to tell you how to do your job, and if you want to allow the game to continue to be discussed here, then that's fine by me. Just seems a bit hypocritical to me, that's all. Why am I arguing against my game being here? Because I don't want to be dishonest, and claim it's something that it's not.


 No.336033

File: d624d25375e0e64⋯.jpg (23.04 KB, 276x326, 138:163, Alfred hang.jpg)

>>336028

>(that I find disgusting but have no intention of going after)

Yeah… for now.


 No.336037

File: 38a936575702450⋯.jpg (308.92 KB, 800x600, 4:3, 1553390543529-1.jpg)

>>336032

I mean, you'd have to bring that up with the others, I'm just saying what seemed to be the consensus at the time when the Kobold game got brought up- again, I never played it so I don't know. What do I know though? I just sit around drinking dark beer or scotch and shitpost.

>>336033

I've defended stuff I didn't like before on this board and have played devil's advocate more times than I'd have liked to, anon. I even defended the cuck thread/banned gorespammer (while shitting on said cucks of course) because it wasn't banned material at the time. I'm basically only around occasionally to pop my head in and make sure everything's alright & running smoothly/no one's bullying BO.


 No.336044

Having rules in the first place is fucking retarded, and you're genuinely a moron if you think otherwise. That is all, you may ban me now.


 No.336063

>>336032

I'm no vol, but I think I got the gist of what is going on. The issue with furry stuff seems to be less about the fetish itself and more about the type of people it attracts. I didn't see whatever shitstorm sparked this action, but, from what I gather, some of the more obnoxious members of the furry community found their way here and the board is collectively lashing out to show they aren't welcome here.

As is often used as an example here, most don't want a repeat of what happened to CoC or Libre Cities. These new rules will likely be forgotten once everyone calms down and only ever brought up when someone who clearly has never been on the board before tries to shill their furry cuck game, like CoC2 or something.


 No.336066

>>336063 (cont.)

For clarity's sake, if I were to try my hand at making a furry game and make a thread about it here in a couple weeks, I doubt I'd have to deal with anything more than the usual offenders that shit up every thread when first made.

That is, of course, as long as I uphold the necessary standard of quality and am not an obnoxious twat about it.


 No.336069

>>336028

>Never played it, but it was already discussed and Kobold Adventures was in the clear, so you're always welcome to come back, dude.

if you're going to pick and choose how to apply the rules to that degree you may as well not have the rule at all. this kind selective enforcement implies that there is some other unwritten rule or that you need to be in the good graces of the authorities for the privilege of breaking them.

it sounds more like the moderation team is unsure of what the rule is supposed to accomplish and what it's supposed to communicate to the user base. it doesn't help that BO didn't explain his reasoning or intentions as far as I can find.


 No.336091

File: 9e2360c70bedc53⋯.jpg (238.19 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, eternal_suffering.jpg)

>>336063

I think there's going to be a hardline stance eventually, but for now it's mostly just soft enforcement when something along those lines pops up.

>>336069

A) Swapping IPs just to respond to the meta thread destroys any point you might be trying to make to a vol since they're just going to see you as a one-and-done shitter who doesn't contribute at all to the board.

B) I never played Kobold Adventure and literally the only person who's ever even mentioned furry content in it is the creator- everyone else who's ever brought it up has explicitly pointed out the kobold and has left out any other details. Do you expect people to have played every porn game on this board or something? I addressed this point here: >>336037 and basically washed my hands of the matter/left it for BO or another vol.

>unsure of what the rule is supposed to accomplish

It's supposed to ban threads like >>328342 (that thread being allowed to stay up for the time being since it was created before the rule was enacted)

>and what it's supposed to communicate to the user base.

It shouldn't communicate much of anything to the current userbase who should remain relatively unaffected. To outsiders however it's supposed to send a clear message. There were only three threads really called into question as grey areas and at least last I checked the consensus was to leave them alone unless a good reason sprouts up to push a more thorough ban. We'll worry about that bump if we get there, and in the mean time I don't really see much reason to make a mountain out of a molehill. By all means lash out over that, but I'd like to think none of us are about to become fag-95 tier moderation nor /a/-tier moderation (not that /a/-tier moderation would be a bad thing). If we were going to do that, it would have been when the Teaching Feeling TL brought half of reddit over with him a long time ago, or when Towercuck was around still, or etc.


 No.336097

>>335958

>rules are common sense

>the same rules we were discussing for the last few hundreds posts

>are common sense

If they're causing so much drama and discussion for so long, then they obviously aren't common sense.

>>336009

>Except that it's been plainly stated that existing generals won't be banned, you colossal faggot.

Can I make a new Flexible Survival thread then, when the old one will die?

If not, then you're a fucking moron for making this invalid argument.

>>336028

>Kobold Adventures was in the clear

It's as furry as it gets. There's transformation, rape, turning into a breeding slave with drugs, characters that have snouts and fur on their whole body etc. Your new "rules" are shit.


 No.336103

Is it wrong that i don't hate furry game threads, so long as they're not /htg/-tier threads?

Hentai games are going into a drought, Patreon-shit games are on the rise and /hgg/ has decided to fight amongst itself to determine which game belongs up here.

That, and text-based furry games are leagues better than furry games with pictures.

How do i put this? I can play a text based furry game due to having the ability to ignore words i dislike. However a picture is a picture and U can't tune that out.

Also 3D furry games are amongst the worst, they should be banned without a second thought except for skyrim


 No.336111

>>336103

Fuck off, Todd.


 No.336117

>>336031

Not sure what sort of newfag you are, but /pol/ has been a significant presence on this board since basically forever and isn't the cause of the problems. If anything /pol/'s presence is a great way to spot outsiders because newfags of all stripes whine about them, from cuckchanners to fagzoners to redditors. The only group that's legitimately managed to kill a project here was /leftypol/.

Anyway, just chiming in to throw my support of BO in trying to clean up the worst of the cuckshit and furfags. More moderation is bad, but for them I'll make an exception.


 No.336118

Why are furry games being banned? I thought the thing that differentiated infinitychan /hgg/ from cuckchan generals was that each game/topic having it's own topic automatically segregates it and creates containment?

I hope the 'general' thread on this board picks up steam though because the fluid discussion of h-games from one to the next is what I really like about the two generals on cuckchan.


 No.336119

>>336118

>Why are furry games being banned?

Because BO and mods threw a hissy fit when they saw this thread: >>>328342 . It doesn't break any rules whatsoever, but apparently BO decided that only games with content that he likes are allowed; since he dislikes furries and cuckolding, they've decided to start banning those.

> I thought the thing that differentiated infinitychan /hgg/ from cuckchan generals was that each game/topic having it's own topic automatically segregates it and creates containment?

Unfortunately BO doesn't think so: he probably think that hiding threads is for pussies or something. And since it's his board, he can do whatever he wants to do with it.


 No.336120

>>336119

>Being this buttblasted

Remember, if you don't like it, fuck off.


 No.336121

>>336118

Because faggotry leaks. Containment doesn't work when the faggots of furry threads start leaking to other threads and you end up with furries winning when it comes to including his content in games like CoC.


 No.336123

>>336121

>Because faggotry leaks.

Shouldn't it be left to each threads own culture as to what constitutes faggotry?

>Containment doesn't work when the faggots of furry threads start leaking to other threads and you end up with furries winning when it comes to including his content in games like CoC.

This is strange. As I take it CoC is essentially a game where anybody can add content as they like, right? And if the person in charge of updates likes it, they include it in the next modded release? The thread culture over there seems to decide what they want to do with their game.


 No.336126

>>336123

>t. Furry


 No.336128

File: 10467b6ffd8d440⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 295.84 KB, 800x600, 4:3, todd vmtb.png)

>>336111

Buy my Game


 No.336131

>>336120

If you don't like me being butthurt, then you can fuck off as well.


 No.336147

>>336123

>>336123

>Shouldn't it be left to each threads own culture as to what constitutes faggotry?

That's already how it goes and it's universally known that furries are faggots that ruin threads with their shit taste.

As for CoC, it was really against furries until recently becausebecause furries grew in majority so drama ensued.

That's why those faggots need to be shut down immediately, reddit spacing friend.


 No.336149

>>336147

>As for CoC, it was really against furries until recently becausebecause furries grew in majority so drama ensued.

What are you talking about? It's the same as ever, there was no drama, and there's no open furfaggotry.


 No.336151

>>336149

He has no idea while attempting to be divisive and get furry game threads kicked off the board. Surprised such faggotry is tolerated to be honest, but I guess that's maybe the culture of /hgg/?


 No.336154

>>336151

Yeah, but if you could figure out your spacing, I'd look a lot less stupid standing next to you.


 No.336156

As you can see, he only makes low quality shitposts in an effort to merely create pointless argument rather than anything constructive.

I wonder how many threads he does this in..


 No.336157

>>336149

>One thread being eliminated by mistake while the flaming lasting for 3 entire threads is no drama

Yiff in hell.


 No.336158

>>336151

You stand out like a sore thumb.


 No.336191

>>336121

>>336147

>>336157

>>336158

>As for CoC, it was really against furries until recently becausebecause furries grew in majority so drama ensued.

The last actual drama was when cucks tried to get their written content in, which was close to a year ago and every single instance of cuck shit has been removed from the game. The only thing your posts say is that you hate CoC and are trying to stir shit up here by spouting the most inane things you can think of.

Here's a little reminder for you: the CoC thread and mod are anti-cuck and anti-furry shit. Not a single contributor from the past year has written or tried to get either of those into the game, and everyone that regulars the thread actively shits on both those kinds of people if they do crop up. Not even to talk about the fact that it has a NoFur toggle that changes every single furry character in the game to be monster-girls or just girls with animal ears and tails.

CoC may have originally been a furry game, but it certainly no longer is here with the mod. It's even funnier when you complain that furry faggotry leaks from the CoC thread to others when it doesn't even exist there in the first place.


 No.336197

>>336191

You are right. I checked and the thing with furries happened in free cities with pregmod, an allegedly anti-furry mod. Then again, yiuyou can't hardly blame me since all text games are garbage and mostly the same shit.


 No.336207

File: 6f38995ac4b0f2f⋯.png (83.38 KB, 449x389, 449:389, autistic screeching.png)


 No.336927

What a world we live in that the furries are keeping to themselves and the faggot drama queens are on the other side.


 No.336967

>>336927

In what world is pushing for their shit content to be included in all games "keeping to yourself", retard?


 No.336975

>>336967

I forgot the part where that's happening here at all. All I see is kobold dev keeping to himself in his threads and the autism inquisition (ie, you) screaming that the furries are taking over.

Of course nobody actually does that so to even make an argument they have to say there's a secret conspiracy from whatever "fag95" is to convert us into furries.


 No.336983

>>336975

Give them one finger and they take your whole arm. Also, the BO already said all threads about furry shit in the board will be allowed, but no more furry shit.


 No.337019

File: d5a555ec6f6c14a⋯.jpeg (80.83 KB, 1024x1024, 1:1, Pepe_the_Frog_-_Plush_dol….jpeg)

>>336983

>stir shit because "if you don't, the furries will invade"

>reason for not wanting furries is "they stir shit all the time"


 No.337023

File: 15ff4b2610fb7ea⋯.png (1.02 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, ClipboardImage.png)

>>337019

Actually, the reason nobody wants them is their shit taste. Furries like shit like inflation, feet, all that shit, and they push it. The fact is, that there's nothing really wrong with liking furry porn per se, the problem is the kind of shit taste faggot they will bring.


 No.337033

>>337023

there's already like 50 threads with NTR games in them, that argument is bad.


 No.337034

>>337033

>Implying

There's no NTR in this board and any time it is discovered people shit on it.


 No.337041

>>335771

Sometime you should check out the stats of mass shootings, using the proper legal definition, globally. NatSoc guys are wildly, flagrantly statistically under-represented.

Of course, you wouldn't know that because you aren't actually paying any attention.

>>335764

The consensus on /pol/ last I checked was that mass shootings were a horrible idea because they wouldn't have the desired effect and the backlash would be catastrophic. That would also be why anyone advocating "direct action" tends to be told "fbi plz go".

Maybe you also need to be paying more attention.

Then again, I haven't been on /pol/ in a long while. Maybe things have changed.


 No.337093

>>337023

I do not give a fuck because it does not affect me. What does affect me is autists shitting up my board and trying to drive away games like kobold dev because they'd rather argue against shit even they admit they barely have a problem with because "give em an inch and they'll take a mile"


 No.337098

>>337093

>I do not give a fuck because it does not affect me

The peak of conformism. Kill yourself.


 No.337101

>>337098

No, that is literallythe opposite of conformism.


 No.337477

what is this dev null shit?


 No.337505

CONDUCTOR WE HAVE A PROBLEM


 No.337527

>>337477

>>337505

Working on deleting it. It's a tor node and the delete functions aren't working properly so it's taking time.


 No.337534

>>337527

BO has tweaked the filter, >/dev/null was the initial pass.


 No.337849

good job on deleting every single tor post on the board.

especially when a vol deleted every single tor post while another was already removing only the spam ones like it should've been done.

how do you fuck up this badly?


 No.337864

>>337849

Same happened in /v/

Torpedos are faggots, though.


 No.337871

File: ade47ee086dc0ca⋯.jpg (66.71 KB, 564x827, 564:827, 1519133333423.jpg)

>>337849

>ten non-shit tor posts

>five hundred bot spam tor posts

>"oh no how could this have happened to me"


 No.337956

File: 40280b3b2120228⋯.jpg (835.26 KB, 986x1000, 493:500, 1540088410285.jpg)

>>337849

Ara ara~ I got a little carried away there and didn't see the other volunteer's work until I had already hit [D+] Anon-kun. My bad.


 No.337964

>>337956

Jim answering DMCA's tier work anon.


 No.338805

>Meta Thread 5: The League of Vols

I'm going to need an official rundown on which vol is which superhero/villain.


 No.338810

>>338805

we're all both


 No.338999

>>338805

that negan guy deletes alot of low quality threads and killed off another 3 threads earlier

he would probably be thanos because he snaps all the faggots from the board

also who is this rickles guy in the board log i havent seen him before


 No.339017

>>338999

Thanos is not even part of the justice league. Or Marvel.


 No.339153

>>338999 (checked)

>also who is this rickles guy in the board log i havent seen him before

He was brought on as a direct result of >>333438.


 No.339186

File: 1c2ff03dec33d12⋯.webm (4.91 MB, 480x270, 16:9, dancing lolis.webm)

Hey, I'm the new vol, went ahead and switched my name from rickles to quill. I was brought on for the FC thread so I'll be mostly focused there. For the rest of the board I'll probably just be deferring to the other mods and helping to keep the report queue down. Here's some dancing lolis.

Post last edited at

 No.339188

>>339186

nice vol tag you fucking loser


 No.339195




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ameta / choroy / d / dempart / general / jenny / miku / monarchy ]