[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / coz / dempart / newbrit / randamu / vg / vichan / vietnam ]

/his/ - History

History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 83rd Attention-Hungry Games
/strek/ - Remove Hasperat

May 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Verification *
File *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.

File: 705fcc8c21bbcc8⋯.jpg (12.62 KB, 236x177, 4:3, 9934ea16984e4b45a14d679c48….jpg)


Can we talk about how badly the Germans got fucked over after WW2? Regardless of how you feel about the Nazis I think that we can all agree that what happened to the Germans after WW2 is in itself an atrocity on par with the Holocaust.

Mass ethnic cleansing of Germans from all over Europe. This was especially bad in Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and elsewhere in eastern Europe. Random Germans with ancestors dating back hundreds of years in those countries were just rounded up and killed, raped, tortured, interned and displaced. These weren't Nazis at all. Just random people who happened to be German.

Worst mass rape in history. German women and girls (and I'm sure quite a few young boys as well) suffered the worst mass rape in human history at the hands of the Russians and their allies. Women were gang raped in front of he children who were often times murdered if they tried to interfere. They were raped with empty bottles, knives, broom handles etc. Some 2 million German women were raped, many ended up being killed or dying from their injuries. Here is a disturbing description of some of the violence they faced at the hands of the Russians https://einsamerkrieger.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/horrors-beyond-imagination/ (warning: VERY graphic)

Destruction of German cities. Major German cities were absolutely leveled and destroyed by allied bombings. The firebomnings of Dresden and other German cities were easily comparable to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in terms of devastation and loss of life.

East and west split. Germany was split in two between communism and democracy. This would last until the Berlin wall came down in 1990.

Mass starvation of German POWs in American run concentration camps. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinwiesenlager

I would also add the current state of Germany today with mass immigration and leaders like Angela Merkel whoPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

19 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 36ab499a93cd6f9⋯.jpg (331.93 KB, 2000x1200, 5:3, pol victoria 2.jpg)


fuck off to /pol/ faggot



This board is /pol/, as is 8chan.

Did you even read the rules? You're the one who should leave.



The mass rape was real, this shit is even recognized by mainstream.

Can you even google properly? Even cuck mainstream media has articles on it.


File: 6741a09af6fe168⋯.png (3.79 MB, 1080x2868, 90:239, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 6741a09af6fe168⋯.png (3.79 MB, 1080x2868, 90:239, ClipboardImage.png)


>Mass ethnic cleansing of Germans from all over Europe. This was especially bad in Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and elsewhere in eastern Europe


>Worst mass rape in history.

Debunked nonsense based on the 8-80 hysteria propagated by Goebbels to make the German people desperate and willing to fight to the bitter end. The Germans gave their soldiers free-reign and would not pursue any rapes they committed in the USSR. Meanwhile the USSR would execute anyone proven to have committed rape. There is no fucking 2 million see pics related and this link.

https://akarlin.com/2013/05/red-army-rape-myth/ (akarlin is an anti-soviet BTW)

Your link is a load of poorly cited horse-shit on an anti-soviet blog that posts regular manipulations.


VGTRK journalist Andrei Medvedev for his post about speaking in the Bundestag. The text is excellent and very good in Russian, so it deserves to be read.

“If I had to speak in the Bundestag, like the boy Kolya, then I probably said these words:

- Dear deputies. Today I saw a miracle. And this miracle is called Germany. I went to you and looked at the beautiful Berlin streets, at people, at the wonderful monuments of architecture, and now I stand here and look at you. And I understand that all this is a miracle. That you all were born into the world and live in Germany. Why do I think so? Because, given what your soldiers did to us in the occupied territories, the Red Army soldiers had the full moral right to destroy the entire German people.

Leaving a scorched field in place of Germany, ruins and only paragraphs of textbooks would remind that there was once such a country. You probably do not remember all the details of the occupation, but this is not necessary. I just remind you that the soldiers of the Wehrmacht and the SS did with the Soviet children. They were shot. Often in front of parents. Or on the contrary, they first shot at dad with mom, and then at children.

Your soldiers raped children. Children were burned alive. Sent to a concentration camp. Where they took blood to do serum for your soldiers. The children were starved. Your sheepdogs ate our children to death. They used Children as targets. Children were brutally tortured just for fun.

At the Lychkovo station, your pilots bombed the train, where they tried to take the children to the rear, and then your aces chased the frightened babies, shooting them in a bare field. Two thousand children were killed.

Only for one thing that you did with the children, I repeat, the Red Army could destroy Germany completely with its inhabitants. Had a full moral right. But did not.

Do I regret it? Of course not. I bow to the steel will of my ancestors, who found in themselves some incredible powers, so as not to become the same cattle as the Wehrmacht soldiers were.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 3b4de1f553e6ce8⋯.jpg (226.01 KB, 721x830, 721:830, Nest of Niggers.jpg)


I'd follow him into battle

File: 81ec50f43734dbd⋯.jpg (185.23 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Anglo.jpg)


Why do people even watch this guy? Many instances the thing he spouts are incorrect and are just based on his speculations. Hell, even when he states that his content are meant to just be his opinions, he tends to spin the topic in such that what he says IS actually factual.

4 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.


I can't stand people like him who yell nonstop



yes, he started to quote his sources and be more carefull after that video.


File: d9cd6ea8f057989⋯.gif (562.64 KB, 374x354, 187:177, 1420502504350.gif)



Why is /his/ full of retarded faggots who can't pay attention to the words people use? He ALWAYS specifies what is or isn't his opinion.

He isn't all that great but sometimes he makes good points. Also, his holocaust video is autistic.


File: 509d66af36c4410⋯.webm (305.47 KB, 640x480, 4:3, beige.webm)


shouts a lot

far to eccentric

overbearing attempts at being quirky

just your typical brit yt fag

File: e26633538e978c3⋯.jpg (16.66 KB, 338x245, 338:245, 338px-Elhanan_Zelig_Roch,_….jpg)


Are Arabs even human?



Why do Europeans get a bad rap as being anti Semitic when Arabs do shit like this?

1 post omitted. Click reply to view.


While Arabs are not precisely saints, jews have proven to be scum that should be bullied by every decent human being.





The arrogance of Muslims really pisses me off, they just pretty much claimed everything they wanted, only reason that Jews can have a Wailing Wall at all was they were willing to kill the parasites. Only reason Christians have any sites left not forcibly destroyed or seized by Muslims is Jews protect them because we pay them too. They put Mary in their stupid book and so decided to take whereever they could find Mary sites. Luckily, Vatican invaded and took back most artifacts from these days.

Muslims could accept they are sharing religious and holy sites with other faiths based purely on butting into them hundreds of years after the fact, and have some humble attitude of tolerance for others and being kind when they have to rub up against other faiths but no they just say that Muslims are the only actual religion on Earth and everyone else just has to change.



this. also

>Jerusalem irrelevant in Islam

>retcon al aqsa to mean jerusalem

>jerusalem now third holiest city in Islam

>'slimes claim jurisdiction over sites not even relevant to their religion and not even in their country

>jews and christians cannot enter dome of the rock

fucking sand nigs man.

File: c075dd7922bcb00⋯.jpg (327.5 KB, 621x733, 621:733, James R Wasson.jpg)

File: d18c6bf6317c548⋯.png (374.13 KB, 637x977, 637:977, Amakusa and Cassel.png)

File: 648b9cf6b434cb7⋯.png (1.41 MB, 979x858, 89:78, Formosa.png)


I want to inform those who have not yet learned and remind those who have that two White Americans who were Union Army Veterans from the Civil War were promoted to Officers in the Imperial Japanese Navy in order to properly advise the Japanese on combating the Taiwanese Aborigines.

I also want to inform and remind that one of these two American Officers, Douglas Cassel, had been involved on the failed American Expedition to Taiwan three years prior in 1871, and that despite hiring foreign advisors the ex-samurai volunteers largely ignored all advice and blatantly disobeyed orders, and that Saigo utilized Cassel's plan for a main offensive but took credit for himself.

File: fdf8b29c2abdeb2⋯.png (53.99 KB, 634x676, 317:338, Fuck Loyalists to be hones….png)


>Loyalists only ever targeted Catholic civilians

>Whenever faced with an armed Provo they were practically helpless and lost every time

>The British never targeted these incompetent serial killers and instead armed them

Say what you want about the Troubles, but I think anyone with a brain can agree Loyalists fucking sucked.


File: 214663b01f27dbd⋯.jpg (583.32 KB, 1909x1273, 1909:1273, Collusion is not an illusi….jpg)

File: 86a1c83c6eff6c2⋯.jpg (209.22 KB, 931x595, 133:85, fall of rome.jpg)

File: 8ba10452e607270⋯.jpg (48.23 KB, 468x365, 468:365, f.jpg)

File: ccc2fdbb88fab24⋯.png (865.88 KB, 602x757, 602:757, Roman legionaries enduring….png)

File: b9537abfc90e84c⋯.jpg (97.23 KB, 497x372, 497:372, map-of-danube-and-rhine-ri….jpg)


2 most major factors;

I - Carrhae -> Christianity

> Suren>Crassus

> Cannabis Cavalry Archers>Money

II - Teutoberg -> Inflation

> Arminius>Varus

> Judas>benefit of the doubt

X *predominantly allowed for* Y

Did I miss anything?

18 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: c3a49f53984f2ef⋯.jpg (172.9 KB, 1024x740, 256:185, IMG_20190129_223226.jpg)

File: 3a603fc44af60fb⋯.jpg (202.05 KB, 1024x882, 512:441, IMG_20190129_223425.jpg)

Oh Roma Invicta, Roma Mater… We learned nothing from you…



What book is this, anon?



Medieval People, by Eileen Power


File: 8a7371996b8a8ee⋯.jpg (15.05 KB, 600x315, 40:21, blank-seagull-meme-2.jpg)


op here, just wanted to add rome started at marius and ended at caesar

hail the tenth

honor the carneia

honor lykurgous

honor the genetic elite

and *breathes in* FUCK CARTHAGE, this time we murder cato the younger first boys, night of the long knives II



No, it started with Numa, the most important state leader Rome has ever had.

File: a82c01c0d172fbd⋯.jpg (37.06 KB, 618x410, 309:205, 170601-saddam-hussein-feat….jpg)

File: f59181ed7ac73a0⋯.jpg (34.67 KB, 854x570, 427:285, saddam.jpg)

File: ec45dde09259612⋯.jpg (18.44 KB, 225x300, 3:4, 279142-c2cee44279dc5577d4d….jpg)

File: ac619cd4998b5cf⋯.jpg (9.1 KB, 190x250, 19:25, 15c2786cbd177ef7c966419663….jpg)


I've been on a 90's Gulf War Saddam kick lately and is it weird that I can't help but notice how insanely good looking he was? I mean holy fuck even in the photos that were taken at his trial after being in a spider hole for years he wears a suit like a boss. it's not like they were trying to make him look flattering. I can't think of a single leader that I've seen who can wear a suit quite like he could.

Half of the photos I see of him look like they were torn straight out of an old men's fashion magazine.

Can't say the same about Stalin or Hitler. They both looked rather oafish.


File: ab8d7487415f937⋯.jpg (226.88 KB, 864x487, 864:487, Saddam_Hussain.jpg)

File: 8c9b866ac16bb6a⋯.jpg (438.93 KB, 2048x1782, 1024:891, EMvAM7Z.jpg)

File: 21fc40b6f1e06bc⋯.jpg (19.91 KB, 370x297, 370:297, blogmedia-1400268473-5130.jpg)

I remember around 2004ish the current American propaganda line was "if we leave Iraq the terrorists will follow us back"

I think what they meant is "if we don't smoke this nigga he gonna come back and fuck everyone's bitch!"


Why do they hate Hussein so much?



He wanted to sell Iraq's oil for other currencies other than the dollar.



Amerinon here. I don't hate him, retrospectively, he did nothing wrong. We need to be purged of neocohens. George Sr died so that's start. Ofc I don't think other Americans feel the same way but IDGAF



It’s the reason Kennedy was killed. He was literally fucking too many bitches. (The Mafia, CIA, Corsican Mafia and Jews involved in the first two might have rationalised it as spanking him for not reigning his brother’s anti mob activities in, protecting national security by protecting American proxy and CIA funding via the drug trade, and getting him out of the way of Israel’s nuke program, but the deep reason was angry sexual jealousy that he was dicking a mob boss’s mistress and cuqqed a senior Jewish CIA man. That’s only the examples we know about. Can you imagine how many bitches he was fucking and how many uptight, unstable spooks and gangsters he pissed off?)

File: a6a0658bfb57c8b⋯.png (48.24 KB, 1008x727, 1008:727, Neanderthal.png)


Big stuff here

It seems that previous models, which indicated a continuous decrease in Neanderthal admixture in Europeans due to natural selection against such variants, probably because they were harmful one way or another, is being contested.

Svante Pääbo, the very and only guy who works with Neanderthal genomes, is reviewing his findings.

He discovered that, by comparing Europeans to Sub-Saharan Africans to see how much Neanderthal ancestry Europeans got is now a failed method, as we now discovered that Eurasians with Neanderthal admixture had return into deep Africa, with people such as Taforalt's Iberomarussians in West Africa and as found in the Mota Cave in East Africa.

What does it mean?

It means that it wasn't Europeans losing Neanderthal admixture over time, but Sub Saharan Africans gaining it.

So, when you compare one to another, one would think that Europeans were losing Neanderthal ancestry.

Not the case anymore.

Today, the estimates of Neanderthal ancestry in Europeans has been calibrated to 1.5~2.5%, after initial overestimates of 4~5%.

But now we're in a situation where they will have to calibrate these percentages again, and we could jump back to 5% or even go as high as 10% Neanderthal. Actually, who knows, really, everything's on the table right now.


>The limits of long-term selection against Neandertal introgression


>Article by Razib Khan, saying what I just said

https://www.gPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 53afd22e421c789⋯.jpeg (35.95 KB, 474x310, 237:155, images.jpeg)


>How does that work?

Your DNA is a code, full of ATGC strings. You see where does it differ from one another.

I'll give you an example, Blue eyes.

Blue eyes is you having A instead of T in a certain part of your DNA. People call it a "gene".

Pic related are how "mutations" are spotted, how we know things are different between samples, how you have blue eyes and the other person don't.

>they have to always compare beetwen ancestries to get an result of the genetic ancestry of certain individual?

To look for similarities, of course.


So, does that mean we are true neanderthals?

If I didn't hear wrong, neanderthals were the fucking shit, with bigger brains, advance technology compared with cromagnons and white.



No, but we have a lot more Neanderthal ancestry than previously thought (niggers as well).



I kinda like it, especially after niggers kept shaming people because they weren't humans, just neanderthal mutants engineered by their nigger scientist god.

Neanderthals were better than cromagnons in every way except on the social and the breeding.


Here it is. They have completed the study.



Due to Eurasians going back into Africa in the past, the signal was falsely reduced.

And in other news, it seems that, contrary to the single admixture event of Caucasians with other non-Sapiens hominds (Neanderthals), they have found not two, but three of such waves into East Asia.


File: 860782e4fb6c7e4⋯.jpg (3.52 MB, 1881x2778, 627:926, MythAndalusianParadise_Fro….jpg)


How do cucks cope with how there aren't any examples of notably multicultural societies that didn't:

>practice some segregation

>have one group have obviously more status over others

>collapse into fire absent of the force needed to maintain itself

>become a shithole

>become a degenerating land (America, Canada)

For more on this:



7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



50% of the 1% is Jewish, let that sink in.

Also, the 1% isn't evenly spread, the 1st place (Carlos Slim, a Mexican Jew) is so much richer than the last place.

Not enough, these public people are only the ones with a declared fortune - we know that there are many people richer than them who have private fortunes, like Gaddafi, who had $200billion discovered after his death. Putin is in a similar position, people speculate he has about $200billion as well.

Then you have the cream of the crop of Banking, Jewish families like the Rothschild who are speculated to have a fortune in trillions of dollars.

You really can't call a factory owner the same as this, we have a super caste in the world beyond everything.



I don't know but rich white or rich jew, they all the same type of vermin to me tbh both have done a lot to undermine their host countries.


>50% of the 1% is Jewish,

Do you have source for that one, genuinely curious.



>I don't know but rich white or rich jew, they all the same type of vermin to me tbh

It seems you know too little, read too little, etc.

>both have done a lot to undermine their host countries.

Well, wherever whites went, people were uplifted from the stone, bronze and iron age.

Wherever jews went, debt slavery, materialism and cultural destruction ensured.

I think the difference is striking, and if you're really mistaking one for the other, it's because you simply don't know how to identify a jew, either by genetics, behaviour, appearance or name.

>Do you have source for that one, genuinely curious.




>Well, wherever whites went, people were uplifted from the stone, bronze and iron age.

Like when White Christians allowed jews to be in charge of finances and usury type of jobs? or are we gonna forget italian banking families like The Bardi and Peruzzi that dominated banking in 14th-century Florence, establishing branches in many other parts of Europe aswell?

>whites went, people were uplifted from the stone, bronze and iron age.

I don't see how creating competition is beneficial for the white race.

>Wherever jews went, debt slavery, materialism and cultural destruction ensured.

That stems more from liberalism and its variations, the things you described are happening right now in asian countries like china, japan or korea where their traditions and cultures are slowly fading away and becoming standarized.



Not him but let me but in.

>Muh Italian banking

A major part of those families were involved with Jews, maybe not Jewish themselves or at least they've never been caught being crypto's, but they were linked to them. Likewise it's noted that Jews were originally involved in banking before Lombard's """replaced""" them.

>That stems more from liberalism and its variations

Who do you think created and pushes liberalism.

File: 9b7f3aa44b77b0a⋯.png (37.85 KB, 1029x810, 343:270, COMMUNISM.png)


Why is this mocked so much by the right?

The whole basis of the argument is that communist utopia in itself has nothing to do with oppressive dictator "communist" regimes of 20th-21st century and i think that is undisputable. So why does the right keep posting it ironically like if it means that true communism means oppressive dictatorship?

17 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



But then their problem comes from accepting the money being offered to them, the problem isn't inherently part of it.



I was trying to say that, in both cases, human greed overcame good intentions.

I don't feel I know enough about communism to say the old "it's a good idea that's never been implemented properly", but I do believe that our current model relies on milking braindead masses for profit and then asking the same braindead masses to vote on how things should be run. Not ideal.





And other orders of monks didn't become that way. Why? They followed Christianity instead of going against it's core principals.



>Not ideal.

I don't like it either, but perhaps strengthening either the state socialism or the corps libertarianism would be worse.

Feels bad to see way more problems than solution, but oh well.



What makes you think regular monks weren't corrupted? What do you think drove them to ascetism in the first place? The righteous are few and far between.

File: c63774bf718d5cf⋯.png (1.19 MB, 1152x768, 3:2, 111._brigada.png)


Thoughts on Yugoslav war?


Not sure how "history" they are, i thought this board discussions were supposed to stop at the fall of the USSR, but whatever.

Don't know much about them but i should honestly. You had different ethnicities living close to each other for a long time and one day it finally imploded, i'm curious as to how that happened, how sudden it was, how total, there are obvious reasons to research what happened there, because i doubt it was the last time Europe faced an ethnic based conflict.

File: 50c651866919b5f⋯.jpg (240.92 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, gf.jpg)


So I was watching The Fall of the Roman Empire and when a Greek got to speak in front of the senate, they started to protest the very notion, even grouping him with the likes of jews. Did Roman treat Greeks like subhumans? And if so, why?

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



Romans always hated nonsense. That's why they liked Cato, Cicero and Aristotle, but hated Socrates and the like.

Sophism was seen as disgraceful, feminine, ans they valued "hard truths", "honesty", "directness".

Plato fills in here as an odd pea, that would only be looked upon in the high Romanticism and Germanic Idealism of the likes of Kant, Goethe and similar.


File: a18eb1b4eb09848⋯.jpg (1.55 MB, 2304x1728, 4:3, uffizi.jpg)

Surely the best source to answer your question is Petrach's Lives. This is a massive historical book of biographies of both Greek and Roman celebrities, as they'd be called today. Written in the first century AD it's set out chronologically from the earliest days of the civilizations ~ 1000BC through to the times of the Empire. The lives are paired, one Roman with a Greek and a comparison concluded each pair, discussed the differences and similarities between the subjects.

The Greeks, while often portrayed as enemies were nowhere regarded as subhuman. They were very much humans, with all the human weaknesses and abilities, and as a race, worthy of immense respect.

Pic related - a Roman copy in marble of a lost Greek bronze in the Uffizi museum.


File: d6cd0f5cb6e0c27⋯.jpg (113.81 KB, 564x852, 47:71, Erastes-courting pedo.jpg)


Maybe it was the queer/paedo thing! Greeks went to shit.


No, Greeks were highly respected in the Roman Empire, specially at the time the movie takes place. For example, the greek sophist Herodes Atticus, who tutored Marcus Aurelius, served as a roman senator and was elected consul in 143 AD. Cassius Dio was another prominent greek senator elected consul in 205 AD.


You guys can insult each other, but at least do it while posting content.

Have a fight about the theme, not about faggotry.

File: 11e799658d15bf8⋯.jpg (14.83 KB, 220x283, 220:283, 220px-Ross_Perot_in_his_of….jpg)


European here, can somebody tell me a little bit about him and if he was ever important?


Looks like Ross Perot


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

In some ways Ross Perot was a forerunner of Donald Trump. He ran for president as a self-funded outsider, campaigning on right-wing populist issues like the budget deficit.

Perot forced other candidates to address the deficit as a political issue. The momentum from the campaign carried over into real budget legislation, and within a short time the US government was actually running a surplus. This surplus did not last of course.

Another lingering aspect of Perot's legacy is how the presidential debate commission added rules to make it much harder for outsider candidates to have a voice. Perot gained legitimacy because he was able to debate Bush and Clinton on television. Now candidates have to be polling at something like 15% to get into the presidential debates – nearly impossible for a candidate without the backing of the two major parties. The establishment does not want to be embarrassed by more Perot types.


File: 164bd8d3cfd06c0⋯.jpeg (9.4 KB, 331x221, 331:221, CrimsonAssurance2.jpeg)


Ross Perot warned the American people that NAFTA was going to destroy our capability to manufacture real goods, and cost us millions of jobs. Bill Clinton lied, and said he would oppose NAFTA, and promptly signed it as soon as he was in office. Perot knew that personal computers were about to boom, and wanted that industry for America. The Clinton Administration let the Chinese steal America's most advanced technologies, including letting them capture an advanced spy plane.

Perot was deeply involved in the Iran hostage situation during the Carter era. But unlike Carter he was able to rescue his employees by hiring mercenaries, at a cost of much of his considerable personal wealth. He also knew that the incoming Reagan Administration was secretly negotiating with the Iranians to delay releasing Embassy hostages until after the elections, and that the CIA had got its people out before they could be taken as hostages.

Perot instead of Clinton would have been a great thing for America.



He ran for President once.

File: b0c7e85b6fee23d⋯.jpg (308.58 KB, 1092x1333, 1092:1333, IMG_2448.JPG)


Why haven't africans integrated into the modern world? Why are they so far behind?

>inb4 muh slavery

They sold eachother as slaves

>inb4 but they had no idea how european slavery was like

If it's called "slavery" I don't think it's very fucking good. Also if you read african texts (things fall apart) you'll find that african men were generally very abusive to their whole household.

>inb4 africa is an entire desert

Africa today is one of the richest continents in terms of natural resources

>inb4 muh nubians

A culture of people that just went north and copied egyptian culture. ""Coincidentally"" the last rulers of egypt were nubians.

86 posts and 18 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



Another bullshit explanation that pretends the problem never existed elsewhere because only Africans still haven't managed to overcome it. Italy wasn't anything near Roman until Romans made it so, and even then it wasn't perfect. They just had the capacity to administer a polity larger than a few zimbabwes.



Lol, India is still a shithole, tho



it's even worse than the middle east



>the elite

Nepotism and inheritance for millenia - there is no evolutionary pressure to get smarter. Those were not elites, even inbreeds.


In my option, Nigers are;t humans: my explanation: 1) short heda; 3 they savages4. culture of kill. That was my exlaining as why to nigres aren't human begins, exptrapolate your option.

Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / coz / dempart / newbrit / randamu / vg / vichan / vietnam ]