[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / eris / fast / komica / leftpol / leftyb / sw / vichan ]

/his/ - History

History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.

Catalog   Archive

Winner of the 62rd Attention-Hungry Games
/eris/ - Wherein Is Explained Absolutely Everything Worth Knowing About Absolutely Anything.

November 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Verification *
File *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.

File: 18e093409888a1d⋯.jpg (76.57 KB, 600x340, 30:17, Heroes of the Iliad. 1829.….jpg)


Discussions about the state of the board and the addition of flags and banners.

8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at



> I have a hard time finding where to sink my teeth into lengthy academic studies in a field I have no experience in. There's so much information here, that I don't know what to focus on.

< watch some high-school level genetics videos on YT

Thanks, man

File: d7f5de6a268d0d2⋯.jpg (4.15 MB, 3303x2433, 1101:811, The_Trocadero,_Exposition_….jpg)


1. Global rules apply.

2. This board is /pol/, as is 8ch.

3. No shitposting.

4. No spamming.

5. NSFW content is allowed within context.

6. Gore is not allowed.

7. Current year and recent matters aren't allowed.

8. Posting Discord links or anything similar is not allowed.

9. Name/avatar/tripfagging without a reason will be bannable.

10. Posts should in general use correct capitalization, punctuation and grammar.

11. Board is 18+. Keep that in mind.

Post last edited at

File: 1420092937940.jpg (131.9 KB, 615x615, 1:1, 大阪城.jpg)



215 posts and 58 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at



Also requesting something on general geography.

File: b0c7e85b6fee23d⋯.jpg (308.58 KB, 1092x1333, 1092:1333, IMG_2448.JPG)


Why haven't africans integrated into the modern world? Why are they so far behind?

>inb4 muh slavery

They sold eachother as slaves

>inb4 but they had no idea how european slavery was like

If it's called "slavery" I don't think it's very fucking good. Also if you read african texts (things fall apart) you'll find that african men were generally very abusive to their whole household.

>inb4 africa is an entire desert

Africa today is one of the richest continents in terms of natural resources

>inb4 muh nubians

A culture of people that just went north and copied egyptian culture. ""Coincidentally"" the last rulers of egypt were nubians.

78 posts and 16 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



>"Niggers = Stupid" theory

Can we really call this a theory at this point?






>Iberian & Anglo powers

>Indian ocean

>naturally occurring climate change

>lower environmental anarchy lower evolution

Bottlenecked, the continent.



As big of a problem as malaria is, why didn't Africans wear thin layered clothing that covered their whole body? Sure they would be a little hot but they wouldn't for certain die from malaria.



Heavy clothing prevents loss of water. Look at most desert people's clothing, they have layer after layer covering them, both to work against sunburning, sweat loss and dusty winds.

And also, Eurasia had the plague and every other shitty disease all over, all the time.

Malaria is a sad excuse.


They're stupid. It really is as simple as that.

File: d0db21db1175fd0⋯.jpg (56.58 KB, 485x330, 97:66, AztecSerpent.jpg)


Why did the native american civilizations fall so far behind the europeans? Was it religion? Lack of competition? Their race? Society?

89 posts and 26 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: a91157b3bed166b⋯.jpg (26.55 KB, 840x450, 28:15, Phylogenetic-analysis-I-Tr….jpg)


Also wrong.

Ust-Ishim is more related to east asians than west-eurasians (they didn't even live in west eurasia back then).

>Yes, it did, but by 17,000 BC it was already in deep America, in a warm climate, far away from Ice and Snow with the Amerindians. There was just one cold corridor, you're completely overestimating the climate.


It literally says it happened in 15500BC (earliest estimation)

Cope harder, inferior being.


File: 37742c5b78a0ebc⋯.png (119.8 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png)



>Most hunter gatherers migrated south to the mediterranean coast, or west to the atlantic coast.

Not at all, do you even know of the SHG or EHG? Post an image of the Ice Age biomes, not today's.

> Amerindians have both east asian and ANE components.


>Proto Amerindians have showed up in northeast Siberia back in 30000BC,

No, these were Para-Caucasians, the Yana.

>ProtoAmerindian lineage with P haplogroup

No, again, this lineage was the Yana one, that would develop into the ANE, a Para-Caucasian group.

>diverged to Q haplogroup

And R, with the ANE, a Para-Caucasian group.

>and raped their east asian neighbours,


>adquiring such east asian genetics,

Yes, because ANE+East Asian = Amerindians.

Just so you know, the closest people genetically to the ANE were the EHG, for instance.

Afontova Gora 3 is basically 100% EHG already.

>which also were present in the arctic conditions for millenia:

They were not, the Basal East Asians were located deep south and only in this Amerindian formation time they started migrating into Siberia.

>Amerindians inherited pure arctic genes

No, their East Asian lineage was from the South.

>compared to european Mediterranean-climate (hunter gatherer) genes,

Again, not at all. Most of Hunter Gatherer ancestry in Europeans today is mediated by the Yamnaya and is EHG. Also, the WHG lived in the cold, as said that Europe in the Ice Age was as cold as the Beringia Refugia.

>neolithic farmer genes,

Well, correct.

>and R-haplogroup (south-siberia and non-arctic climate) genes.

R cPost too long. Click here to view the full text.





And before you continue to spill your bullshit. Read this paper:

The population history of northeastern Siberia since the Pleistocene


>Far northeastern Siberia has been occupied by humans for more than 40 thousand years. Yet, owing to a scarcity of early archaeological sites and human remains, its population history and relationship to ancient and modern populations across Eurasia and the Americas are poorly understood. Here, we report 34 ancient genome sequences, including two from fragmented milk teeth found at the ~31.6 thousand-year-old (kya) Yana RHS site, the earliest and northernmost Pleistocene human remains found. These genomes reveal complex patterns of past population admixture and replacement events throughout northeastern Siberia, with evidence for at least three large-scale human migrations into the region. The first inhabitants, a previously unknown population of "Ancient North Siberians" (ANS), represented by Yana RHS, diverged ~38 kya from Western Eurasians, soon after the latter split from East Asians. Between 20 and 11 kya, the ANS population was largely replaced by peoples with ancestry from East Asia, giving rise to ancestral Native Americans and "Ancient Paleosiberians" (AP), represented by a 9.8 kya skeleton from Kolyma River. AP are closely related to the Siberian ancestors of Native Americans, and ancestral to contemporary communities such as Koryaks and Itelmen. Paleoclimatic modelling shows evidence for a refuge during the last glacial maximum (LGM) in southeastern Beringia, suggesting Beringia as a possible location for the admixture forming both ancestral Native Americans and AP. Between 11 and 4 kya, AP were in turn largely replaced by another group of peoples with ancestry from East Asia, the "Neosiberians" from which many contemporary Siberians derive. We detect additional gene flow events in both directions across the Bering Strait during this time, iPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 672fa879e5efae1⋯.png (654.7 KB, 1683x2586, 561:862, Greater_Caucasus_Fig_2.png)

To finish you off finally, look this Admixture graph.

Do you see EHG, WHG, SHG, Mal'ta and Afontova Gora?

They formed a cline, and the ANE weren't Amerindians, but Caucasians, just like the Yana Paleosiberians of the Pleistocene had nothing to do with Amerindians or East Asians, but were a Para-Caucasian group.

In fact, you could say that there was a continuity from Iberia to the Altai of European Hunter Gatherers, from the WHG to the ANE.

Villabruna was R1b 14kya, this says much.

File: c9f0aab4796cac0⋯.png (267.66 KB, 500x501, 500:501, 1499854242425.png)


>race this, race that

>everything is about race

Why are you people like this? The difference between races is mostly utterly insignificant and your every question can be answered through looking at historical trends and development. There are thousands of arguments explaining why all the things you blame on race were actually caused by environment or other factors and the physiology of those people was completely irrelevant. So why does even /his/, the one board i thought would be actually educated, keep pushing this narrative? It is a joke to some people, but other actually take it seriously. Are they just all pic related?

note that i am not saying all races are the same leftypoll bullshit, i am just stating that historical characteristics weren't caused by them in the slightest

43 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



Tell us more on how evolution stopped from the neck down.



>You're 100% correct if you're referring to Arabs and "Chinese", both of which were a lot more civilised and scientifically advanced than whitoids for centuries.

Holy crap, laugh at this imbecile.

>Do you not find it terribly convenient that the only people lacking Neanderthal DNA are black Africans and small tribal peoples like Australian aboriginals?

Africans have Neanderthal DNA. And Australian Aborigines have the highest levels of such.



Considering Africans have lived in very limited to no civilization, perhaps their psychology has not developed properly to live in one.

>Inventing stuff is not easy.

Yet every other civilization did more than them.

>Unfortunately i don't know shit about pre-modern Somalis or Swahilis so i can't talk about them, but anything south of Cape Bojador and west Cape of Good Hope was pretty much cut off except of the occasional land caravan or two. Nothing on the level of Mediterranean trade, Arab trade or Silk Road

Even the connected Africans have amounted to almost nothing, certainly a bit more than in the interior of Africa but still not much, even if they were part of the silk route trade.

>Its just 58 years since their independence and they spent two thirds of that time being engulfed by Cold War, they definitely didn't have enough time yet.

Bullshit, other parts of the world suffered far more and in less time have developed a lot more, one hears that excuse again and again for why African nations have been starving since independence yet other nations that started under the same or worse circumstances are thriving now. They had a lot of things left by Europeans that they just destroyed and wasted, then they ask the rest of the world the western world for aid.

>But its slowly getting better now.

Not because of their own doing, as always seems any development in Africa is payed for and developed by outsiders.

>My humble opinion is that Mesoamericans are overhyped. Africans also had astronomy, mathematics, agriculture, big cities and huge palaces, we just like to focus on ancient Aztects because they are more mysterious. But i'm not really sure here because i honestly don't know anything about astronomy or mathematics so its hard for me to compare.

The point is that they accomplished more despite being way more isolated, so isolation by itself is not a good explanation.

>There are undoubted differences in intellect, i'm not Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: e29a93deed08e67⋯.jpg (100.89 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, Pachacutec-1.jpg)


Because Amerindian higher civilization potential is a historical fact, and europigs replacing Amerindians with inferior beings with lesser civilization potential has to be known by every worthy being alive.


>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)

>from aurignacian-antelian to start of crop development: 9000 years(30000BC-21000BC)

>from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 10500 years (21000BC-10500BC)

>from neolithic revolution to copper furnaces: 5000 years (10500BC-5500BC)

>from neolithic revolution to tin bronze metallurgy: 6000 years (10500BC-4500BC)


>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 5500 years (16000BC-10500BC)

>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 5000 years (16000BC-11000BC)

>from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 7000 years (11000BC-4000BC)

>from neolithic revolution to copper furnaces: 3300 years (4000BC-700BC)

>from neolithic revolution to tin bronze metallurgy: 4700 years (4000BC-700 AD)

-"2003a. Tiwanaku Period (Middle Horizon) bronze metallurgy in the lake Titicaca basin: A preliminary assessment. En Tiwanaku and its hinterland, T 2. A. Kolata, (Ed.), pp. 404-434. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C."

-"1997. El bronce arsenical y el Horizonte Medio. En Arqueología, antropología e historia en los Andes: Homenaje a María Rostworowski, R. Varón y J. Flores E. (Eds.), pp. 153-186. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima."

-"https://www.researchgate.net/publicPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



Please, don't talk anymore, you're just a fool that tries to cope with low self-esteem by clinging to fairy tales.

File: 50c651866919b5f⋯.jpg (240.92 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, gf.jpg)


So I was watching The Fall of the Roman Empire and when a Greek got to speak in front of the senate, they started to protest the very notion, even grouping him with the likes of jews. Did Roman treat Greeks like subhumans? And if so, why?



>Did Roman treat Greeks like subhumans? And if so, why?

Not, but they had a distaste of their ways.

You see, both civilisations shared a big core, but then Romans were much more pulled towards Celts and Germanics culturally, while Greeks were pulled to some Anatolian/Minoan cultural sphere.

It was precisely this no-nonsense aspect of Roman culture that disliked the "Merchant/Rethoricist" aspect of the Greeks.

So yes, they really had a very strong distaste of Greek oratory, because it was so subjective. Jews would be impressed by how the Greeks could spell bullshit.

See what Cato had to say about Greek and the Greeks.


Or this curious case:


>During his stay at Rome, he attracted great notice from his eloquent speeches on philosophical subjects, and it was here that, in the presence of Cato the Elder, he delivered his several orations on Justice. The first oration was in commendation of the virtue of Roman justice, and the next day the second was delivered, in which all the arguments he'd made on the first were refuted, as he persuasively attempted to prove that justice was inevitably problematic, and not a given when it came to virtue, but merely a compact device deemed necessary for the maintenance of a well-ordered society. Recognizing the potential danger of the argument, Cato was shocked at this and he moved the Roman Senate to send the philosopher home to his school, and prevent the Roman youth from the threat of re-examining all Roman doctrines. Carneades lived twenty-seven years after this at Athens.



Thanks, anon



Romans always hated nonsense. That's why they liked Cato, Cicero and Aristotle, but hated Socrates and the like.

Sophism was seen as disgraceful, feminine, ans they valued "hard truths", "honesty", "directness".

Plato fills in here as an odd pea, that would only be looked upon in the high Romanticism and Germanic Idealism of the likes of Kant, Goethe and similar.

File: 2d1a911bc73676d⋯.jpg (119.35 KB, 964x615, 964:615, lion.jpg)


what's in your /his/ folder?

45 posts and 57 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



>/leftypol/ is the only place I've ever seen it used and it probably came from cuckchan if anythi

>i've ever seen


So, you don't know



No it was an assumption.

Although reverse search shows it on Reddit, Cuckchan, Quora, Kym, Twitter. Either /britpol/ or /leftypol/ shilled it so much normalfags got a hold of it, or it did indeed come from Cuckchan or even worse Reddit.


File: 554c211379aa781⋯.jpg (286.08 KB, 500x654, 250:327, Based.jpg)

File: 69ebe3aae868231⋯.jpg (271.4 KB, 501x500, 501:500, deepfry-2.jpg)

File: a2a9d07b5e3ba04⋯.jpg (127.31 KB, 206x349, 206:349, 7-1 copy.jpg)

File: 45baa8f8b3b0cdf⋯.jpg (360.07 KB, 600x450, 4:3, 67b (1).jpg)

File: 1375da961512704⋯.jpg (245.03 KB, 500x646, 250:323, deepfry-3.jpg)



Man, this image is so bland. You should have more details here like "Vivisection" instead of "Neo nazi link", like, what the fuck is that?


File: 665a8c49a6df48c⋯.jpg (70.54 KB, 750x884, 375:442, 1524337791373.jpg)

File: c80a1d238df73fa⋯.jpg (394.13 KB, 2197x1463, 2197:1463, 1524339339942.jpg)

File: af4049caf3df0d3⋯.jpg (27.59 KB, 543x800, 543:800, 1524385177979.jpg)

File: 87033488764c790⋯.jpg (172.92 KB, 1400x1168, 175:146, 1524361541215.jpg)

File: de4c0f2bbe70c80⋯.jpg (57.18 KB, 530x398, 265:199, do-it.jpg)


I've read many conflicting things about this. That it was mostly conscripts on the beaches, with tougher guys, including SS and several panzer divisions further back. But what was the actual strength of these panzer and SS divisions? The SS also varied a lot depending on when you look at it and where. Panzer divisions sounds bad, but there's a big difference between full strength and half, foreigners and conscripts vs volunteers and more trained guys etc

File: 064feef512308d9⋯.jpg (396.23 KB, 1456x2078, 728:1039, leopold II.jpg)


Hello everyone. I've read some piece on the internet on how the massive population decline that supposedly happened under Leopold II in the Congo Free State was impossible. The two main objections to the popular narrative were that the population numbers are wrong and that contemporary evidence was flimsy. Can someone help me out with that? I want to know what really happened.

62 posts and 24 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 0218cd3d4e752c0⋯.jpg (155.07 KB, 926x821, 926:821, ncomms15694-f4.jpg)


Arabs bred with their Nigger slaves. Muslim populations even have more Nigger mix in them than non-Muslim minorites like Jews.



wait for him to cite Kemp



File: 6d7446a000745fc⋯.png (81.14 KB, 500x564, 125:141, assburger.png)


I too am curious about the topic of this thread



About the only good claim Noam ever made, everything else he wrote about was pure liberal Jewish trash



That needs to change.

File: a82c01c0d172fbd⋯.jpg (37.06 KB, 618x410, 309:205, 170601-saddam-hussein-feat….jpg)

File: f59181ed7ac73a0⋯.jpg (34.67 KB, 854x570, 427:285, saddam.jpg)

File: ec45dde09259612⋯.jpg (18.44 KB, 225x300, 3:4, 279142-c2cee44279dc5577d4d….jpg)

File: ac619cd4998b5cf⋯.jpg (9.1 KB, 190x250, 19:25, 15c2786cbd177ef7c966419663….jpg)


I've been on a 90's Gulf War Saddam kick lately and is it weird that I can't help but notice how insanely good looking he was? I mean holy fuck even in the photos that were taken at his trial after being in a spider hole for years he wears a suit like a boss. it's not like they were trying to make him look flattering. I can't think of a single leader that I've seen who can wear a suit quite like he could.

Half of the photos I see of him look like they were torn straight out of an old men's fashion magazine.

Can't say the same about Stalin or Hitler. They both looked rather oafish.


File: ab8d7487415f937⋯.jpg (226.88 KB, 864x487, 864:487, Saddam_Hussain.jpg)

File: 8c9b866ac16bb6a⋯.jpg (438.93 KB, 2048x1782, 1024:891, EMvAM7Z.jpg)

File: 21fc40b6f1e06bc⋯.jpg (19.91 KB, 370x297, 370:297, blogmedia-1400268473-5130.jpg)

I remember around 2004ish the current American propaganda line was "if we leave Iraq the terrorists will follow us back"

I think what they meant is "if we don't smoke this nigga he gonna come back and fuck everyone's bitch!"


Why do they hate Hussein so much?



He wanted to sell Iraq's oil for other currencies other than the dollar.



Amerinon here. I don't hate him, retrospectively, he did nothing wrong. We need to be purged of neocohens. George Sr died so that's start. Ofc I don't think other Americans feel the same way but IDGAF

File: dabb42d60724b58⋯.jpg (229.59 KB, 1920x1418, 960:709, maxresdefault (1).jpg)


Sup guys. So I've been pondering something recently and thought it would be an interesting topic.

Why are European/European descended people comparatively and historically so much less violent and brutal than other races of people? If you look at European wars, yes they were extremely bloody and violent but they usually did not involve mass slaughter of civilians (women and children) and mainly involved military deaths. Europeans never bayoneted babies, gassed civilians or tortured POWs either. POWs kept by the Germans in WW2 were treated very humanely as were POWs kept by the Americans. We never locked them in cages and poked them with bamboo or executed them.

Europeans also don't have a history of sex slavery/concubinage. European kings did not have huge harems like Asian (mainly Muslim) rulers did.

Nowadays it is much the same. You don't see Caucasian/white people sawing each other's heads off or strapping explosives to our bodies.

European countries are by far the most peaceful, safest and most advanced in the world and always have been. I'm curious as to why this is.

49 posts and 18 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.



No. OP is just a faggot. Whites were violent as fuck to one another as well as to other races. The difference being that whites did that prompted by great wars and calamities (neither German nor Americans went though what Russians went through in WW2 so it's hard to blame them for not being the biggest fans of German civilians and POWs) while subhumans do that on regular occasion because of smallest of trifles, just look at spics and slanteyes.



There was in the Crusades.

Although defined as "Christedom" instead of "Europeandom".



Things like modern medicine obscure the rate of violence we have today, as law enforcement also does at large.


File: 354f6d76291d627⋯.jpg (197.47 KB, 1280x760, 32:19, IMG_20181130_032531.jpg)




very trustworthy



Heretical to associate the two

File: e3ed4b02f3017f0⋯.jpg (26.63 KB, 640x522, 320:261, xeOE9Fx.jpg)


So I made these bullet points to grasp the event. Is this the gist of it?

> Samurai of old battle the imperial court, defeat the Emperor and establish the first shogunate. The Emperor becomes a figurehead.

> After a century of battles between the Daimyo (warlords) for the title of the Shogun - "the Sengoku period" - Tokugawa Ieyasu restores peace and establishes the Tokugawa Shogunate.

> He decides to close the country from the white gaijin devils.

> Hundreds of years later, Matthew Perry comes with big battleships and demands to open the country for trade or face war and also be there for you.

> Shogunate decides to open the country and signs treaties with many different foreigners. Daimyo are displeased and split on the issue.

> "Shishi" - the southern samurai of Satsuma and Choshu regions are particularly unhappy, they see Japan as sacred ground and didn't like the treaties signed without the consent of the emperor (a figurehead). They ask to revere the emperor and expel the gaijin.

> The emperor agrees, orders to expel all the white pigu. But the shogun doesn't consent.

> Shishi then start to attack the gaijin themselves which results in gaijin ships bombarding their cities. They then try to take the imperial city of Kyoto but are defeated by Shinsengumi. Shogun suppresses Choshu.

> Shishi, in order to expel the gaijin, decide to first learn their ways - "Japanese spirit, western technology". After traveling abroad and arming themselves western style, they retake Choshu and drive the shogun away. Satsuma and Choshu form the Satcho alliance to dethrone the Shogun.

> The Shogun pusses out, steps down and decides to serve under the emperor as the head of council.

> The Satcho alliancPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.



>The Japanese Nobility made Japan's dream possible by them all engaging in the new industrial mindset.

err no, that's literally not what happened, did you even read the OP



That's exactly what happened.

The nobility them even fund the Samurai to abandon land holdings and become industrialists themselves.

Did you even read a book?



Why do all retards always double down when proven wrong?



I don't know, I'm not wrong, you're doing that yourself, so you must know.


File: 32037dceae117e7⋯.png (2.29 MB, 5016x1004, 1254:251, meiji.png)


Actually, let me shut you up before you grow into a larger nuisance.

If you're actually that idiot "history student", you might as well never come back here.

Begone, imbecile.

File: 86a1c83c6eff6c2⋯.jpg (209.22 KB, 931x595, 133:85, fall of rome.jpg)

File: 8ba10452e607270⋯.jpg (48.23 KB, 468x365, 468:365, f.jpg)

File: ccc2fdbb88fab24⋯.png (865.88 KB, 602x757, 602:757, Roman legionaries enduring….png)

File: b9537abfc90e84c⋯.jpg (97.23 KB, 497x372, 497:372, map-of-danube-and-rhine-ri….jpg)


2 most major factors;

I - Carrhae -> Christianity

> Suren>Crassus

> Cannabis Cavalry Archers>Money

II - Teutoberg -> Inflation

> Arminius>Varus

> Judas>benefit of the doubt

X *predominantly allowed for* Y

Did I miss anything?

8 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



t. person who didn't read the 7 previous posts



using lead based makeup and drinking all water with lead contaminations the equivalent of sucking fumes out of an exhaust pipe for air to breathe



Admittedly i never really read up on Rome much, so i am just going to repeat what (((they))) taught me at school, but i would welcome if anybody could debunk it for me, because i know everybody shits on the "barbarians caused the fall of Rome" theory, but i never heard why exactly is it wrong.

So what i heard is that it went like this

1. Christianity and no more expansive wars due to reaching the maximum size capable to be effectively administered meant no more slaves, hence no more cheap workforce

2. Latifundae (maybe not the right word, i mean the big landowners) lost their workforce (since all the free people rather worked on their own farms where they grew just what they needed to survive) and the major agricultural industry in non-essentials (mainly oil) staggered, which was a big hit to the economy

3. Romans tried countering this by inviting shitload of barbarians as cheap workforce

4. Barbarians demanded political rights and preservation of their own culture meanwhile Romans wanted to assimilate them

5. Barbarians used two-field agriculture which lead to exhaustion of the soil and famines

6. All of the above culminated in barbarians rebelling against the central government and fall of Rome



Rome fell because the Turks conquered them by using a Hungarian's super canon to destroy their walls.


File: 8d1de4c67bf8acc⋯.jpg (400.91 KB, 467x597, 467:597, napoleon was inept and in ….jpg)


Rome never fell

File: 510e6802d6c7dda⋯.png (237.31 KB, 1280x853, 1280:853, Hieroglyphic 1.png)

File: 7eb4b10aa16b2d6⋯.png (157 KB, 1115x681, 1115:681, Hieroglyphic 2.png)

File: e5fddbccb004c30⋯.png (77.58 KB, 700x394, 350:197, Hieroglyphic 3.png)

File: 7087fb8ab736abf⋯.png (243.98 KB, 1280x853, 1280:853, Hieroglyphic 4.png)


89 posts and 75 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 20ae20ac8991ddb⋯.png (334.46 KB, 701x727, 701:727, Genetic Map.png)

File: a8079b2049e7df1⋯.png (469.52 KB, 709x803, 709:803, Genetic Map 2.png)


>Geographic patterns in human genetic diversity carry footprints of population history and need to be understood to carry out global biomedicine. Summarizing and visually representing these patterns of diversity has been a persistent goal for human geneticists

5–9. However, most analytical methods to represent population structure 10–14

do not incorporate geography directly, and it must be considered post hoc alongside a visual summary. Here, we use a recently developed spatially explicit method to estimate “effective migration” surfaces to visualize how human genetic diversity is geographically structured (the EEMS method). The resulting surfaces are “rugged”, which indicates the relationship between genetic and geographic distance is heterogenous and distorted as a rule. Most prominently, topographic and marine features regularly align with increased genetic differentiation (e.g. the Sahara Desert, Mediterranean Sea or Himalaya at large scales; the Adriatic, inter-island straits in near Oceania at smaller scales). We also see traces of historical migrations and boundaries of language families. These results provide visualizations of human genetic diversity that reveal local patterns of differentiation in detail and emphasize that while genetic similarity generally decays with geographic distance, there have regularly been factors that subtly distort the underlying relationship across space observed today. The fine-scale population structure depicted here is relevant to understanding complex processes of human population history and may provide insights for geographic patterning in rare variants and heritable disease risk.



>The same pattern was also observed when only the western-central Sahelian groups of sub-Saharan Africa were considered (admixed vs. western-central Sahel, Spearman’s Rho = 0.509, p = 1.51 × 10−3; northern Africa vs western-central Sahel, Spearman’s Rho = 0.218, p = 0.2). These data suggest that the presence in northern Africa of sub-Saharan patrilineages was not due to recent contacts but probably occurred in more ancient times, possibly during the Green Sahara period considering the coalescence ages of the clades. Our findings seem to be at odds with genome-wide studies [42, 43, 59, 60] reporting a recent relevant sub-Saharan genetic component in modern northern African populations, mainly attributed to the Arab slave trade. This apparent discrepancy between inferences based on Y chromosomal and autosomal data could be the consequence of a sex-biased sub-Saharan contribution to the northern African gene pool that occurred in historical times. Indeed, it is known that the trans-Saharan Arab slave trade involved twice as many servile women as men (almost the reverse of the Atlantic slave trade ratio). Moreover, few male slaves left descendants, whereas female slaves were imported in northern Africa as household servants and as concubines and their offspring were born free, thus contributing to the local gene pool [54, 61]. Thus, we suggest that the Arab slave trade mainly contributed to the mtDNA and autosomal gene pool of present-day northern Africans, whereas the paternal gene pool was mainly shaped by more ancient events. This hypothesis is in line with genome-wide data obtained from three ancient Egyptian mummies (dated between ~ 2.5 and 2 kya) showing a not negligible ancient sub-Saharan component (~ 6–10 %)

Much of the Negro blood in NW Africa is from the slave trade.


File: be2c022e69159f5⋯.png (511.14 KB, 8000x1080, 200:27, haak_k16-20.png)



Global admixture chart from Haak et al. that shows the admixture of Southern Italians and Spaniards. Note the lack of light blue to teal admixture (linked to Negroes in Western Africa) in the two while having a significant amount of light purple (linked to West Asia).


File: e5f19744a899bea⋯.jpg (14.69 KB, 399x400, 399:400, disapoint pepe.jpg)


>biting bait this much easily


So are all american nigger egyprologists kangz advocates, or is it just the vocal minority of das rites?

Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / eris / fast / komica / leftpol / leftyb / sw / vichan ]