>>31702
>"Richard executed every prisoner and surrendered soldier, but its justified, because he couldnt march with so many prisoners."
In every other video he says christians are noble enough to ransom prisoners and never kill them or sell them into slavery like barbarians.
>"When the crusaders neared Jaffa, Saladin panicked, and launched a massive assault on the christians in a desperate attempt to stop them."
In reality he was ghosting them and harassing them, but part of his force broke formation to get off their horses and shoot from the ground, as to have better aim.
>"Richard's men were ready and he ordered a charge"
When in reality his own army, tired of being shot with arrows, also broke discipline and formation, and some of the knights charged, by pure luck exactly as the arabs were dismounting to shoot better.
Basically both armies had a bunch of low discipline morons break formation and do stupid shit, and thus the fight began, when neither commander wanted a proper fight.
>After this defeat Saladin couldnt get his troops to fight Richard and only ran around cowardly collecting men.
Yes, because after you lose a battle you are supposed to avoid more battles until you regroup and reform the army.
And it was quite the opposite, he had problems getting his troops to not attack Richard, as they were all a bunch of proud religious zealots who wanted to punish him for what he's done.
>Richard would've taken Jerusalem, but he was deeply concerned about what would happen to the city when he leaves, so he didnt.
He didnt take it, because his army was in absolutely no condition to siege, nor attack, and because Saladin, by dodging fights and running around like a coward, had collected a much bigger force.
LOSER LOSER LOSER etc. If you can watch 3-4 of his videos and not see how biased you are, I am afraid you might have a very strong bias yourself.