/his/ - History

More of their claims

https://imgur.com/a/tPZ0z

From what I understand, the Middle East used to be whiter before the Arab conquests. That doesn't mean that we was kings, but that there's probably a fairly decent amount of truth to those kinds of ideas. That doesn't mean that the ancient Egyptians were all full on Nordic or anything, though. I think the blue eyes in ancient art of this type were often symbolic.

I know they're getting a lot of their ideas from stuff like March of the Titans (considered a pseudohistory work from what I understand– how much substance there is to those claims, I don't know), and considering how the first .jpg tries to pass of Yuya as being the Biblical Joseph (which isn't an accepted belief in Egyptology), I wouldn't put much stock in these images.

Having said all that, I really don't know much about the topic.

>>36215

>pic one

>which skull does it most resemble

If you ask me, of those three presented, it's actually most like the Asian one.

>>36219

>>36220

Oh and Egyptians themselves used red tones to paint themselves (which includes the priests and pharaohs), and also described peoples like Hyksos (who could've been related to Indo-Europeans) as pale-skinned. So Egyptians were most likely "bronze-skinned", perhaps a bit like the modern-day Khoi-San on the other side of Africa.

>>36215

>>36225

>Khoi-San

Actually the high cheekbones (called "caucasian facial structure") are a Khoi-San trait too.

>>36215

Take this racist shit to

>>>/pol/

>>36227

Shut the fuck up. We're here to explain what's wrong with "this racist shit". People might actually learn something from the discussion.

>>36216

This is pretty retarded, straight off the bat they're saying that Europeans created the pyramids just because they look similar… has it ever occurred to any of them that this is pretty common architecture and is relatively simple when considering other grand structures? Honestly, buildings with steps that have a point are not uncommon and it does not mean we share a common ancestor that inherently means we love to make pyramids.

Honestly, this sort of shit is pretty retarded, mate, the problem wit /pol/ is that they're naive enough to believe something they read in an infographic without actually researching the topic. In my opinion, you should leave it because it's simply trash.

>>36227

Fuck off, this guy is asking a question and we are answering it, if nobody questioned anything then we would just be mindless idiots. You should praise this guy for bringing this shit here to be ripped apart rather than believing it and using it as "evidence" as to how Europeans are the creators of everything everywhere.

By the way, OP, all of this "niggers are inferior", "Jews rule the world" and "the holocaust never happened" all started off as memes on /pol/, newfags came in and started believing and now pretty much all of /pol/ unironicly post about all this shit.

>pyramids … has it ever occurred to any of them that this is pretty common architecture and is relatively simple when considering other grand structures?

the best part about the pyramids is that unlike other more "phallic" grand structures they cannot tip over. Also, the angle of repose (the maximum slope angle that can be supported on a pile of loose material) is around 40° for most common materials (from sand to flour), so any guy with half a wit will know that building a big pile is the most secure way for making a monumental structure…

>>36231

whoops didn't mean to sage this

>>36216

The last point on this is retarded, since when was a spiral or a swastika an aryan symbol?

>>36233

since forever and to answer your other post they always believed it for the most part but it was more about Thumbing their noses like edgy teenagers but they stopped being edgy.

>>36215

Others have already explained why these specific claims are on extremely shaky ground at best, so I'll just add that almost anytime /pol/ claims something that drastically contradicts commonly accepted history, they are engaging in some egregious bullshit cherry-picking. Like the image of the New York Times posting a half-dozen different calamities befalling "six million Jews" before the holocaust supposedly proving that the holocaust was just the latest in a long line of hoaxes, which revolved around six million for numerological reasons. It turns out that articles involving tragedies befalling four million Jews or seven million Jews or almost any other number of millions of Jews are just as common. The Jewish people did not generally have a good time in the first half of the 20th century and America really likes millions. The default dream of the average American was to become a millionaire (before inflation made a million dollars an actually kind of small amount of money so far as lifetime achievements go, so now we're in this weird spot where "billionaire" is a pipe dream but "millionaire," while still a difficult achievement, is still a very low starting point for a guy in his twenties trying to find the limit of his capabilities).

>>36227

>racist

Wew. Where do you think you are?

Why does /pol/ keep posting here, don't they know what we think of them by now?

>>36240

The swastika is actually a symbol associated with indo-europeans though.

>>36229

>that they're naive enough to believe something they read in an infographic without actually researching the topic

Nah, m8, I actually researched the holocaust when I read those infographics that raised some interesting questions.

>>36230

>"niggers are inferior", "Jews rule the world" and "the holocaust never happened"

All true, more or less.

>all started off as memes on /pol/

I've heard the Hitler stuff started on /b/ because of edginess and the userbase of /pol/ kept finding coincidences that eventually led to the ironic fact of it being true. Hell, that the press(es) in Austria were owned by Jews was noted by an eminent history professor in the 1880s.

>>36237

>still believes in fairy tales

>>36245

You do realize no one gives a shit what you think, right?

As for the topic at hand, thinking that Europeans were involved in the creation in civilizations, such as Egypt and others, is rather absurd. It would be more accurate to say they were Caucasoid but not Europoid. Probably Semitoids, if I were to neologize.

>>36247

Yes, it was one of the symbols they used.

>>36227

>>36245

Probably the first new poster on /his/ in months and you faggots try to drive him away.

Have fun in this stagnant shithole of a board. /his/ could have been great. Too bad the mods were such cucks in its early days. /pol/ has better history threads than this board.

>>36243

In /his/, not in /pol/

>>36255

>no serious arguments FOR the historicity of the Holocaust.

FTFY

>Most of them boil down to red herrings

No, they don't. There is plenty of evidence that disproves it.

>("the Jews control the media, therefore they made up the Holocaust,"

That's true, though. Again, check out "The Jewish Question" (1891) by Goldwin Smith for some evidence substantiating that and a passage in Hitler's Mein Kampf.

Here: https://archive.org/stream/sermonsandaddres00golluoft#page/n245/mode/2up

>"Jews profit from it, therefore it never happened," false equivalencies in general, etc.)

First part, true; second part, true, except for "therefore" and its implication.

>the idea that six million were gassed/cremated is ridiculous

Well, it is because it isn't possible, esp. on the capacity of the crematoria and the number they had and the inefficiency of it all.

>ssertions that x piece of evidence was fabricated, despite their being no evidence to support their claims).

I can't recall any of those. And you know this how? How do you know if the evidence isn't supported if you haven't actually looked at their arguments, which I'm sure you haven't because the ones that you have posted are shit.

>implications that human lampshades or industrial scale human soap production are considered factual by mainstream historians

Those are used because they reveal the ridiculousness of it all. You have people believing in those things and in gas chambers, and those turned out to be false, so it is reasonable to assume that the gas chambers are false. They're more in jokes than serious arguments anyway.

Hell, I rekt one of you retards who posted something from Shermer (?Sherman) who himself made a claim about ausrotten and Ausrottung that I btfo out; then the fucker never responded. I think it's you because your using the same arguments Shermer had.

TL;DR: You suck at this and you're cancer.

>>36257

if hes such a ninny that two posts scares him off a board, he shouldnt be on the internet in the first place.

>>36227

>>36245

> what we

who is this we, kemosabe

I've been for a while pondering if there's someone boredly trying to specifically cause conflict between the boards. Going to the meta thread to go HAHAHA LOOK LOOK THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT HISTORY HAHAHA SO DUMB and linking there, etc.

For the record, don't see anything wrong with this thread. Can anyone point to me what exactly in the rules or guidelines would point this thread and/or OP to be kicked out?

That said,

>>36259

>>36255

There's a thread for this already.

>>14747

>Look at this picture, what does it resemble?

>Just by looking

I'd fail your thesis defense right off the bat, anon. That is unscientific and pretty susceptible to your own bias.

It's as scientific and objective as this video.

>>36237

>egregious bullshit cherry-picking

Pretty much.

>>36266

>I've been for a while pondering if there's someone boredly trying to specifically cause conflict between the boards. Going to the meta thread to go HAHAHA LOOK LOOK THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT HISTORY HAHAHA SO DUMB and linking there, etc.

It's many people from /leftypol/, who comprise a number of your posters and get absolutely rectally ravaged by anything /pol/-related because they can't stand arguing with /pol/ and had to set up their own board like pansies.

>>36276

d6ea75 here, I've been here from the start and I don't think anyone here actually browses /leftypol/. If you wanna discuss we wuz aryan shit, take it to your containment board.

>>36278

If you want to reject open attempts at Historical discussion (re-read the OP, it's straight out "do you think this is right? Wrong? What's your opinion" instead of "WE WUZ ARYAN FUCK YOU IF YOU DISAGREE"), take it to the meta thread to complain about moderation and the board culture or whatever. Right now, you're the one shitting the thread.

>>36268

>almost every ancient civilization you learn at school was indo-european

>what is shang dynasty

>what is mohenjodaro-harappa

Also, look at mohenjodaro-harappa, they have sewage system in their cities. Look what noble aryan/indo-european did to them. Poo in the Loo.

>>36286

>/pol/ is one person

>>36287

I like to think that it is just one guy rambling to himself about niggers and kikes.

>>36288

hahahahaha, just sitting in a room resetting his router constantly