[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / bbw / dempart / femdom / hydrus / lovelive / mewch / tenda / wmafsex ]

/his/ - History

History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.
Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.

File: dabb42d60724b58⋯.jpg (229.59 KB, 1920x1418, 960:709, maxresdefault (1).jpg)

 No.41657

Sup guys. So I've been pondering something recently and thought it would be an interesting topic.

Why are European/European descended people comparatively and historically so much less violent and brutal than other races of people? If you look at European wars, yes they were extremely bloody and violent but they usually did not involve mass slaughter of civilians (women and children) and mainly involved military deaths. Europeans never bayoneted babies, gassed civilians or tortured POWs either. POWs kept by the Germans in WW2 were treated very humanely as were POWs kept by the Americans. We never locked them in cages and poked them with bamboo or executed them.

Europeans also don't have a history of sex slavery/concubinage. European kings did not have huge harems like Asian (mainly Muslim) rulers did.

Nowadays it is much the same. You don't see Caucasian/white people sawing each other's heads off or strapping explosives to our bodies.

European countries are by far the most peaceful, safest and most advanced in the world and always have been. I'm curious as to why this is.

 No.41658

>>41657

>POWs kept by the Germans in WW2 were treated very humanely as were POWs kept by the Americans.

I guess you assume Russians are Asiatic, then?


 No.41659

One Word:

Honor


 No.41660

File: 4a2d39e6623c748⋯.jpg (15.97 KB, 467x298, 467:298, 12-49-34-pinker-fig-3-3.jpg)

>>41657

It wasn't always like that though.

But either way - pic related is the effect of Manorialism in Europe and Castration as punishment to violent criminals.

And this study here is about skin colour in humans and violence:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840


 No.41661

File: 08c9d3d5338a71f⋯.png (1.17 MB, 1594x1018, 797:509, german furry.png)

/his/ turned into /new/ so quickly.

Temember when germans skined alive roman legionaries in their pagan days and when they performed ritual canivalism, also romans in their conquest of the Gauls, reduced their population via pillaging, slavery and also the casualties of wars, if i recall correctly the total gaul population killed or enslaved reached nearly one millon by the end of the campaing

There is also this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selk%27nam_genocide


 No.41662

>>41658

Most died from starvation/freezing to death. Not torture/execution.


 No.41663

>>41662

> Most died from starvation/freezing to death. Not torture/execution.

That part when you are dragged outside in a -20 Celsius winter day to get doused with water until you freeze solid only nominally counts as "freezing to death".

Also, give numbers. Since I have massgrave with ~20,000 people who got executed within a walking distance (and that's just minor blip on the radar, when you start taking into account stuff that was going on in the vicinity), I have a certain doubt in your words.


 No.41664

File: 665a358aa62aa2d⋯.jpg (80.89 KB, 1200x1000, 6:5, Hajnal_line.JPG)

>>41662

>>41658

Learn about the Hajnal line. Also, Communism doesn't represent "Russians", analyse the place and people before it.


 No.41666

It's simple,

Europeans, especially western, are cucks.


 No.41667

File: 0b462ac65738c83⋯.png (108.45 KB, 1084x855, 1084:855, China GDP Per Capita.png)

File: af4e7a6c7afe84c⋯.png (1.42 MB, 1917x574, 1917:574, In the Loo.png)

>>41666

I wonder who's behind this post.


 No.41673

This post is so dumb that I don't even know whether it's /pol/ or /leftypol/ pretending to be /pol/ anymore.

>So much less violent

<What were the marauding hordes of the 100 Year's War

<Whatever happened to all those 150.000 odd Gauls (notably including women and children) that fled from Caesar during the Gallic Wars only to be intercepted and slaughtered by him?

<Whatever happened to Carthage after the second Punic War


 No.41676

>>41673

There's a difference between barbarism and militarism, just saying.


 No.41679

>>41673

All of those things happened hundreds of years ago at least.


 No.41680

>>41679

>Why are European/European descended people comparatively and historically so much less violent and brutal than other races of people?

>Why are European/European descended people comparatively and historically so much less violent

>historically


 No.42650

Christianity


 No.42651

>>42650

Tell us how Africa is a safer place to live than Far East Asia. What with the Christians in Africa.


 No.42652

>>42651

THEORY: Christianity only works if at least the higher portion of the population (ie. the ruling class, intellecutals, etc.) is able to comprehend abstract topics.


 No.42653

>>42652

I just realised I spelled "intellectuals" wrong, truly I am a BIG THINKER!


 No.42675

>>41657

so you are implying races are different on more things than just appeareance?


 No.42676

>>42652

Africans are the exception. If Asia had Christianity as it's core for the 1700 or so years Europe did then Asia would be more advance than Europe is.

Also as much of the thread already said, before Christianity Europe was damn brutal.


 No.42677

>>42676

> If Asia had Christianity as it's core for the 1700 or so years Europe did then Asia would be more advance than Europe is.

No it wouldn't since Orientals by nature aren't that innovative.

>before Christianity Europe was damn brutal.

>Christians don't fight wars against each-other


 No.42678

File: c36f14571f8edd7⋯.png (101.27 KB, 626x207, 626:207, st. augustine.png)

>>42676

You mean

>before Greco-Romanisation Europe was damn brutal

Though, ultimately, this depends on what you think is brutal - I don't doubt that some people nowadays would find even 19th century Europe brutal, or even pre-WWII 20th century.

You realise that a good chunk of what made Christianity blow-up a few centuries after its inception was merging it with preexisting Greek philosophies, right?


 No.42679

I don't think Europeans are less violent, and in fact, I think we are much more than others (maybe equals to the Amerindians).

We are a warring race.

But then, I think we're much less cruel in our violence, akin to, say, Japanese warrior ethos or something.


 No.42686

File: a435ff5a57509e3⋯.jpg (65.33 KB, 704x408, 88:51, 5404260_orig.jpg)

>>41657

more anarchism more peace


 No.42687

File: d9b2aeda50b4550⋯.jpg (426.73 KB, 3403x2196, 3403:2196, civilisation in one pictur….jpg)

individualism, self soverignty, property rights, civilisation


 No.42725

>>41657

Judeo-Christian values


 No.42726

>>42725

No. It's falsifiable and non-dependent.

Also, there is much of it for antithesis.


 No.42727

>>42725

Tell me how can Far East Asia has some of the least dysfunctional countries around while rejecting Abrahamism in any form.


 No.42733

>>42727

>>42727

He also doesn't account savage christian countries of Africa and Latin America.

His mistake was conflating Culture with Race.

Culture is a consequence of Race - the Christianity that first appeared with Middle Easterners changed dramatically in Europe to fit the European character.

Buddhism in East Asia in completely different than in India too.

And so on.


 No.42734

>>42733

>even when nowdays there is a americanisation going on arround the globe

Europe wasnt that great for almost a millenia after the beginning of the dark ages


 No.42736

>>42734

>Europe wasnt that great for almost a millenia after the beginning of the dark ages

It seems someone lacks /his/torical knowledge.

Specially because, by this time Europe already controlled the world.


 No.42737

File: 65ea72fded00781⋯.png (77.48 KB, 608x625, 608:625, 95d5aab14b062090ace1e42ca9….png)

>>42734

Hey reddit. How's the reddit and memey sauce?

>>42736

Some European countries (Italy for one) already were at worst rivaling the Chinese and Islamic empires economically even before Columbus' journey. Which debunks the Guns, Germs, and Steel argument that attributes Europe's success to taken from Pablo and Jamal.


 No.42739

why do you think?


 No.42740

File: 6ccaa6be730b31a⋯.jpg (523.64 KB, 2171x750, 2171:750, ancient china.jpg)

>>42736

it didnt, most europe was only self sufficient rewarding goods production, are you saying that the Frankish empire had influnces on places like India?

>>42737

>i dont like it, must be reddit

I doubt they can rival China in the 14th and 15th century, the productivity of china during the Ming dynasty was masive and already advanced technologies like ship rotatory masts and square veils. Also there is no data of italy before the 13th century so you cant compare the data before the mongol invasion on China and no european data during the first millenium of our age where things where really bad.


 No.42741

>>42734

>Europe wasnt that great for almost a millenia after the beginning of the dark ages

Yeah, but then it became great and affected the world more than any other continent.


 No.42742

>>42741

Man, it really was a great time in Europe.

Guilds and other forms of social institutions all flourished then, gothic architecture, better painting than everywhere else, philosophy, etc

Even math continued from geometry and developed without the need of either algebra or non-retarded numbers (this here is undefendable: Europe's numbers were indeed retarded and both the Aryan Indian numerals and the 0 really shone when arriving there, not elsewhere).

The Dark Ages weren't Dark and recent research has debunked it.

It was called like that by snobs of the Renaissance and Illuminism, retards themselves who couldn't see value in anything non-material or non-comercial.

Technology by that time regressed, but not by a lot (worst tank was in infrastructure) and it quickly improved in its the foundations (things like building methods, animal husbandry, agriculture) to then skyrocket into glory.

Only faggots believe Europe was somewhere behind the world any time in its history.

Hell, we now know that the Neolithic societies of Europe developed first and then gave the knowledge of megalithic buildings to Egypt, Mesopotamia and North Africa.

It's fucking glorious.


 No.42743

File: 7a21c6815c4af28⋯.png (134.42 KB, 1400x600, 7:3, Hre vs celestial china.png)

>>42742

>if they got irrigation in one country they got irrigation in all over the continent

you sound like that, only during the 13th and 14th century most of europe was getting back on their feet, thats almost a millenia, most of the stuff you wrote were more common after the 14th century, also matemathics advances in the West were more advanced than in other parts during the 16th century whit the early development of calculus, this practically kickstarted the enlightement era since mathematics helps managing empirical data, i really want to hear what somebody thats know more than just western universal history can tell.

Still there is something odd about all the scientific enlightement in the west, for some reason the developments on medicine before the 20th century were pretty slow, the germ theory of disease was only proven in the 19th century yet the microscope was invented in the 16th century (even if primitive, you could see whit that big micro-organism like amoebas and fungus), also Claudius Galenu theories stuck whit medics for more than a milenia, the guy got its knowledge by disecting animals more than humans, it doesnt help that the romans believed (i think they made this illegal) that disections were inmoral because it profanated the body o the person, and catholics viewed this as sinfull, it's really odd how medical discoveries in the west were so slow compared to other fields, i remember other anon saying that the chinese already practiced surgeries whit anesthetics and had some form of vaccine.

>Hell, we now know that the Neolithic societies of Europe developed first and then gave the knowledge of megalithic buildings to Egypt, Mesopotamia and North Africa.

Proof? sounds like Varg bullshit.


 No.42749

Non whites are violent savages.


 No.42750

File: dd7d6bf8c98c0a2⋯.png (424.87 KB, 1317x1652, 1317:1652, Iq_correlation_to_skin_col….png)

>>41657

>were treated very humanely as were POWs kept by the Americans

Didn't Americans kill a whole load of German PoWs by starvation AFTER the war?

>why less violent

It's pretty clear to me that the main reason for this is the highest IQ, aside from several asian races. Asians, however, are pretty infamous for their slaughter of each other, are they not? Maybe highest IQ starts increasing racism again, kind of like horseshoe.

Some might say religion played a part, but I'm not buying it, amount of religious people in a country directly correlates with how much of a shithole that country is. USA is the only country that breaks this rule, but then again any American idiot will claim that he's religious even though he doesn't now the first thing about bible.


 No.42763

>>42743

>you sound like that

That's your idiot brain.

>only during the 13th and 14th century most of europe was getting back on their feet

It seems you don't know history at all. Do you even Frankish Kingdoms? Italy's City-States? Byzantium?

>thats almost a millenia

<600 - 1100

<millennia

>most of the stuff you wrote were more common after the 14th century

Not at all, do you know about the political innovations of the middle ages? or the agricultural ones? or the building ones? No, you do not know.

>also matemathics advances in the West were more advanced than in other parts during the 16th century whit the early development of calculus, this practically kickstarted the enlightement era since mathematics helps managing empirical data, i really want to hear what somebody thats know more than just western universal history can tell.

Because you want your penis to be a vagina.

https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2017/09/mathematics-is-essentially-european-accomplishment.html

>it's really odd how medical discoveries in the west were so slow compared to other fields

It was slow everywhere. China relied on fucking mystics and alchemy or astrological idiocy.

This continues to this day.

>Proof? sounds like Varg bullshit.

Things like these are the ones that make me realize snobs do a very good job at pretending to know anything, when in fact, are ignorant of all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalith

Do you even AMC?


 No.42766

>>42763

>That's your idiot brain.

so it's true, you are cherrypicking and only focus on the exeptions.

> Do you even Frankish Kingdoms? Italy's City-States? Byzantium?

that's not the mayority of europe, more cherry picking, and you know its really for the 600 to the 1300

>Because you want your penis to be a vagina

Le base and le redpilled, but i was talking about advancements during the dark ages, not before, also the blogpost (it's a news site) that you gave as evidence only list acomplishments during and after the 13th century, doesnt list anything form the dark ages, it even agrees whit me that China got stagnant during the 16th century and europe took the lead.

>Things like these are the ones that make me realize snobs do a very good job at pretending to know anything, when in fact, are ignorant of all.

idiot, egyptians had to solve different problems (rivers and sand) when transporting stone and shapping it, same as the incas (mountains, chasms and jungle), both cultures addresed these problems in different ways on their own, you proved nothing.

why the migthy white patrician is so butthurt over a few centuries of weakness?


 No.42771

>>42766

>so it's true, you are cherrypicking and only focus on the exeptions.

See how you don't know what you're talking about?

>that's not the mayority of europe

Do you want to include more of what? Iberia was taken and Eastern Europe was under the Avars and similars.

These places were de facto Europe, and you're the one cherrypicking when excluding them.

>more cherry picking, and you know its really for the 600 to the 1300

Fucking weak, it was precisely the time of manorialism and the start of guilds.

>Because you want your penis to be a vagina

I'm doubling down here, you need a push forward.

>Le base and le redpilled, but i was talking about advancements during the dark ages

Not such thing as "Dark", meme facebook reader.

>not before, also the blogpost (it's a news site) that you gave as evidence only list acomplishments during and after the 13th century

I said a case for Aryan numerals above, faggy.

>doesnt list anything form the dark ages

Because it wasn't important for the time, but later when it became, it appeared out of necessity, contrary to elsewhere in the world.

>it even agrees whit me that China got stagnant during the 16th century and europe took the lead.

China's history is stagnation. Even now it is having fake growth with an ever-increasing ghost economy. Not that the West is any better, but China is all about staleness. They have 1.4 billion people and can't have the same purchase power per person, or meaningful science per capta - it only has ants building copies.

>idiot, egyptians had to solve different problems (rivers and sand) when transporting stone and shapping it, same as the incas (mountains, chasms and jungle), both cultures addresed these problems in different ways on their own, you proved nothing.

I don't have to prove anything because this is not my point, what I stated has been a fact in archaeology for over a decade now. Building techniques with stones came to the Middle East and North Africa via Neolithic Europe.

>why the migthy white patrician is so butthurt

I'm not even White.

>Centuries of weakness

If anything, Europe's was fully militarized. It had surplus crops and population growth as well. Crafts became more widespread and democratic.


 No.42772

>>42771

>It's a fact I won't explain anything

You are not even giving dates or sources, you are full of shit and you are mixing modern China with ancient china for some reason.


 No.42773

>>42772

I'm mixing Ancient and Modern China because it's the same civilization, the same people, the same mentality and the same characteristics.

>Spoonfeed me plox

I already gave you a link full of stone cities of Neolithic Europe, and this last summer the heat and dryness there revealed a lot of them. Examples of these are Skara Brae, Ġgantija, Stara Zagora, Choirokoitia and more.

By that time, Europe was inhabited by the EEF homogeneously and thoroughly, a people most close to today's Sardinians.


 No.42774

File: 570ace8b1c261d4⋯.mp4 (1.57 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, pgXYfLkRdJ0.mp4)

>>42772

It's funny, /his/ is being raided by idiots who think they're smart.


 No.42775

File: a8cda77de309205⋯.jpg (334.4 KB, 1600x1200, 4:3, sardinians sardinian peopl….jpg)

File: 603d114fd204a94⋯.jpg (96.46 KB, 591x960, 197:320, sardinians sardinian peopl….jpg)

File: 80b4507c74db79d⋯.jpg (56.64 KB, 534x534, 1:1, sardinians sardinians sard….jpg)

File: aae127faf5f605b⋯.jpg (54.58 KB, 800x541, 800:541, 11745759_1084853571543647_….jpg)

File: 2f666158c866d82⋯.jpg (40.41 KB, 640x428, 160:107, sardinians sardaigne sardi….jpg)

>>42773

I remember some faggot saying ancient europeans and mediterraneans were this removed swarthy people who were not "europeans" per se at all, something that genetics rebuked completely.

Tanned men in pictures were just that: tanned. The women were as white as milk, and ignoring that was intellectually dishonest.

Here are the Sardinians, who are 96% EEF, they're a preserved living picture of Old Europe.

>MUH CHERRY PICKING

Google search them and you'll get the same.


 No.42782

You're right, Europeans never did that to themselves.

They reserved it for non-Europeans.


 No.42784

>>42775

They're beautiful. I'd like to go there.


 No.42785


 No.42802

>>42785

There was never a pan European unity


 No.42803

>>41658

No. OP is just a faggot. Whites were violent as fuck to one another as well as to other races. The difference being that whites did that prompted by great wars and calamities (neither German nor Americans went though what Russians went through in WW2 so it's hard to blame them for not being the biggest fans of German civilians and POWs) while subhumans do that on regular occasion because of smallest of trifles, just look at spics and slanteyes.


 No.42804

>>42802

There was in the Crusades.

Although defined as "Christedom" instead of "Europeandom".

>>42803

https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewgabriele/2018/11/28/middle-ages-not-murder

Things like modern medicine obscure the rate of violence we have today, as law enforcement also does at large.


 No.42811

File: 354f6d76291d627⋯.jpg (197.47 KB, 1280x760, 32:19, IMG_20181130_032531.jpg)


 No.42812

>>42804

>forbes

very trustworthy


 No.42842

>>42725

Heretical to associate the two


 No.42921

>>42803

>neither German nor Americans went though what Russians went through in WW2 so it's hard to blame them for not being the biggest fans of German civilians and POWs

Are you seriously trying to say that Russian barbarism is okay because Communism? Or are you saying it's okay because of "zee Germans"? You're making some kind of excuse here and I'm having a hard time understanding it. In any case there's no excuse for their barbarism.


 No.42923

The crusaders pillaged their way through Europe, which wasn't unusual for an army on the march, but their fanatical slaughter of anyone non-christian once they got past Constantinople was pretty rough. I'll concede that they just been on a hell of a yomp and weren't exactly representative of normal European people.

But consider what they did upon breaching Jerusalem compared to Saladin's (a sandnigger savage) mercy later.


 No.42925

>>42923

>Muslims never kill non-combatants

>muh noble savage Saladin

There is no pre-modern society that opposed targeting non-combatants when there was no obvious need for them.


 No.42932

>>42923

>But consider what they did upon breaching Jerusalem compared to Saladin's (a sandnigger savage) mercy later.

Guess being sold into slavery aint that bad, but still


 No.42958

File: 8ab5bfbd49b9a31⋯.jpg (79.91 KB, 478x383, 478:383, A6088.jpg)

File: b3c7c369b9cee4d⋯.jpg (79.92 KB, 498x383, 498:383, A6085.jpg)

>never

and if it's about race i guess bartolome de las casas or montaigne were jews

"therefore we can say so that they (the indians) are savages in consideration of the rules of reason, but not of ourselves, who surpass them in barbarity at all regards" (end of 16century)

how can you believe that honor is only european and per example that throwing babies to dog wars is >very humanely

there is almost nothing in common between an umanista's and a conquistador's conception of honor

also in the 'dark ages' before the catholic mariage kings (like karl the great) had a many wives and bastards were not misregarded (like karl martel)

why it is : because you are making up shit from nowhere

i am european and proud of my culture but using history to prove that it only takes to be european to bconstitute an advanced society is just embarrasing


 No.42959

>>42958

>redskins dindu nuffin


 No.42960

>>42959

did i say that ?

no

they were also violent is obvious to everybody

but you can't say that there was no violence against civilians : there was very quickly nothing but civilians that were enslaved with great cruelty

what justifies that to you ? it was the scum of europe against its slaves

and then great poems and flags for the wealthy of marchands popes and emperors

where is the civilization here

none of you have any sense of what history is

none of what you say resist to a rational discussion

you are only glad to say stuff you wouldn't dare to say in person

it is just boring


 No.42963

>>42960

>leftypol

>4chan

>tumblr

Also:

>saying attacking civilians is badwrong even though the Romans, Mongols, and Redskins all did that


 No.42966

>>42963

>Why are European/European descended people comparatively and historically so much less violent and brutal than other races of people? If you look at European wars, yes they were extremely bloody and violent but they usually did not involve mass slaughter of civilians (women and children) and mainly involved military deaths. Europeans never bayoneted babies

i was answering

you have no arguments it's okay

is it leftist to say it is not good to kill women and children ?

you only say the opposite of what you think is my opinion, think for your fucking self

and you accepted my point you can't draw a historical moral line between civilizations


 No.42967

>>42966

It is stupid to draw a moral line between civilizations, but taking a holistic view it is obvious that the comparative brutality of Europeans is less than that of basically every major racial group, and this is despite having more chances to indulge in grievous brutality, since European colonialism was at a far greater scale than Asian or near Eastern colonial phases. As much as you can nitpick obvious examples of European cruelty (given you've got all of recorded History, and the longest records about the largest empires to pick from at that), it's tendentious to ignore the remarkable and historically unprecedented (bordering on self-destructive) charity and leniency with which Europeans treat foreigners, as well as the comparative advantages in quality of life enjoyed by European colonies vs non European colonies, whether you look at them now or during their colonial peaks. And this is only "brutality" as it pertains to interacting with alien cultures, Europeans also just tend to treat each other far more fairly and equitably than other races do in their societies.

Given what we know scientifically about comparative aggression between racial groups, this seems to fit perfectly well; except for the fact that Orientals are less aggressive on a personal basis, which would conflict with the obvious barbarism of the Han empire, and historical examples such as the cruelty of Imperial Japan or the Mongols. Possibly this metric is confounded by greater group conformity among Asiatics? One barbarian at the helm might tend to make them barbarous in aggregate.


 No.43001

mainly because of reason and Christianity


 No.43014

File: 5f469ef6b85ef46⋯.jpg (12.49 MB, 4500x3665, 900:733, 5f469ef6b85ef462c8ec5a5d05….jpg)

>>41661

Julius Popper was a Jew from Romania. Furthermore, references to extreme brutality in Medieval and Ancient Classical works are usually viewed with a grain of salt. For example, even given so called 'anti-Semitic' views of European scholars, they did not believe that Semites engaged in routine ritual child sacrifice until they discovered in Carthage the sacrificial remains of children littered around and altar amidst the animal remains. Archeology has since discovered that Semites (of which the Punics in Carthage were only one family) did engage in child sacrifice, even to Yahweh, a rite that was replaced with the eighth day genital mutilation of Jewish and Samaritan boys, a legacy that was also passed down onto Mohammadans in the form of prepubescent ritual genital cutting. So barring some clear evidence, historians lean towards these being literary fictions meant to convey a sense of brutality. Also the Christian historians of yore completely made up some and exaggerated other examples of what they saw as sexual deviancy in pre-Christian heathen nations.

>>42785

>The Holocaust

<The Holodomor

The former being a projection of the latter onto the perpetrator's foremost and principal adversary, the German folk.


 No.43076

>>41657

Real answer? Christianity.

Meme answer? Genetics.

Europeans were all savages (yes, even the romans and to a lesser extent greeks) who regularly practiced torture as a scare method to keep their enemies and subjects from attacking them. Also, Historically African wars pre-gunpowder were literal dickwaving contests with very little actual battles. By far the chinese have the bloodiest wars and the most savagery.


 No.43081

>>41657

Because whites are cucks and are not bold enough to do what is neccesary to save our race.

Whites need to understand that when only the last jew and nigger is dead then peace can finally be brought to the world.


 No.43082

>>43081

Why niggers though?

They are mostly unoffensive, they just sit in their shitty continent killing each other and that's it.

The problem is that niggers know that there's a world out there, and they know about consumerism and capitalism, which makes them want to move to other continents and have better lives, you can blame colonization for that.

There's also the niggers that already live outside of africa, those should be killed, it could also serve as an example, that way niggers will stay in their continent, afraid of being killed if they get out.


 No.43085

>>43076

>Real answer? Christianity.

>I am ignoring how modern day Africa and the non-White Americas are shitholes despite all the Christians

>Meme answer? Genetics.

You're not going to find a Nigger population that can make a society like Japan.

>Also, Historically African wars pre-gunpowder were literal dickwaving contests with very little actual battles.

>He can't name non-laughable sources claiming this

Wars between non-state societies kill proportionally of the population than societies with states.


 No.43086

>>43085

He said Christianity because of it's contribution to the creation of western culture.

Most non white americas are shitholes due to a history of corrupt or conservative leadership and warlords, which stopped industrialization and modernization of the economy.

Crime is mostly related to social inequality, and south america is unequal as fuck.


 No.43087

File: ebff9a2c9393a31⋯.jpg (40.49 KB, 400x395, 80:79, Meme.jpg)

>>43086

I see a pattern.


 No.43088

>>43086

>He said Christianity because of it's contribution to the creation of western culture.

>I am pretending the Greeks and Romans had no impact on Christianity

>Most non white americas are shitholes due to a history of corrupt or conservative leadership and warlords, which stopped industrialization and modernization of the economy.

Hey leftypol. Anyway:

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-and-iq-mixed-populations-part-1/

https://www.amren.com/news/2019/02/the-heritability-of-self-control-a-meta-analysis/

http://www.unz.com/jthompson/gould-got-it-wrong/

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-g-factor-is-a-universal-construct/

Magic dirt isn't a thing, Jared Diamond. Kunta Kinte Muhammed Jabongo wasn't a Kang of Egypt by the way.


 No.43091

>>43088

>I am pretending the Greeks and Romans had no impact on Christianity

And your point is?


 No.43092

>>43088

>Hey leftypol

Why leftypol?


 No.43093

>>41657

They aren't.


 No.43094

http://www.unz.com/akarlin/northern-europes-late-development-as-argument-against-race-differences-in-iq/

Sorry Niggers lose again.

>>43091

>says Christianity achieved it

>someone points out that Christianity as done in Europe owes far more to indigenous Europeans than Semites

>>43092

Babbling about muh conservative leadership and warlords and muh social is just babbies first leftypo/cuckservative garbage to deny population differences.

Whatever. Game over. You lost. We already found factors like self-control are significantly hereditary.


 No.43095

>>43093

Go to Detroit and come back.


 No.43097

>>43094

>someone points out that Christianity as done in Europe owes far more to indigenous Europeans than Semites

So what? Does that mean that Christianity had no part on the development of western culture?

>Babbling about muh conservative leadership and warlords and muh social is just babbies first leftypo/cuckservative garbage to deny population differences

That's the most retarded shit i've heard in my life.


 No.43099

>>43097

>So what? Does that mean that Christianity had no part on the development of western culture?

Considering this (Christianity's effects) never happened for anybody other than Whites, it roots in something that actual Europeans have which others don't. Not something that Christianity as a brand of Semite worship brought in.

>That's the most retarded shit i've heard in my life.

Sure it is. How's South Africa doing? Or Detroit?


 No.43100

File: 8d9686a6fda069a⋯.png (1.87 MB, 795x1066, 795:1066, german death camps 1.png)

File: 2318a7d7f9b7826⋯.png (1.98 MB, 767x1060, 767:1060, german death camps 2.png)

File: 1a1ba65a48c3f49⋯.png (461.86 KB, 554x890, 277:445, german deaths after world ….png)

>>41657

15 million germans died after ww2

they were kept in actual death camps they had no roof over their heads they had no toilets they just had mud death


 No.43111

>>43100

REMEMBER THE 15 GORILLION


 No.43121

>>41657

>You don't see Caucasian/white people strapping explosives to our bodies.

True, they just use guns for their school/mall shootings.


 No.43123

>>43121

Ever see Detroit's murder crime stats? And who gets arrested for killing the most?


 No.43125

>>43123

>muh detroit

Every time.


 No.43127

>>43125

You can't name a White or Japanese majority area as dangerous to live in as Detroit or the Congo. Or Mexico. Being a cuck and/or a sore shitskin like Nicholas Taleb, you deny that there are any differences in the races that impacted how they behave.

I'll wait for you to start We Wuzzing.


 No.43137

>>42921

are you retarded?


 No.43139

>>43137

>is leftypol


 No.43146

This is true. Just look at pretty much every video on LiveLeak or BestGore. It's never whites chopping off heads and dismembering each other or blowing each other up.


 No.43174

>>43127

Russia


 No.43182

>>43174

Nowhere in Russia is as dangerous as Chicago or Detroit.


 No.43183

>>43174

Russia and China's cities are both far less violent crime ridden than Murica.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / bbw / dempart / femdom / hydrus / lovelive / mewch / tenda / wmafsex ]