[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / chori / choroy / cyoa / dempart / lovelive / vietnam / vore ]

/his/ - History

History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.
Winner of the 82rd Attention-Hungry Games
/tikilounge/ - Relax, take it easy

June 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


History. Genetics. Archaeology. Anthropology. HBD.

File: c9f0aab4796cac0⋯.png (267.66 KB, 500x501, 500:501, 1499854242425.png)

 No.42751

>race this, race that

>everything is about race

Why are you people like this? The difference between races is mostly utterly insignificant and your every question can be answered through looking at historical trends and development. There are thousands of arguments explaining why all the things you blame on race were actually caused by environment or other factors and the physiology of those people was completely irrelevant. So why does even /his/, the one board i thought would be actually educated, keep pushing this narrative? It is a joke to some people, but other actually take it seriously. Are they just all pic related?

note that i am not saying all races are the same leftypoll bullshit, i am just stating that historical characteristics weren't caused by them in the slightest

 No.42752

>Why are you people like this?

Because it's overlooked in political discussion to the point that bringing that up is impossible

>The difference between races is mostly utterly insignificant and your every question can be answered through looking at historical trends and development.

Guess you're retarded

>There are thousands of arguments explaining why all the things you blame on race were actually caused by environment or other factors and the physiology of those people was completely irrelevant.

And there are arguments against those

>So why does even /his/, the one board i thought would be actually educated, keep pushing this narrative?

the "we're all equal, race is a social construct" is the narrative

>i am just stating that historical characteristics weren't caused by them in the slightest

But why wouldn't they? how would they not?


 No.42753

>>42751

That's simple…the ones in charge are waging a holy war against every race on this planet, and they do it by forcing them onto each other. Worked pretty much flawlessly for over 2000 years and counting.


 No.42754

>>42752

Bring me any example of historical fact, trend, characteristic or simple event that was in your mind caused by race.

My impression from lurking and your post is that you faggots blame everything on race because you are uneducated, your whole knowledge is based on watching youtube videos, you are bitter about your fucked up life which is utterly uninteresting, grey and you achieved nothing in it, and you are reactionary to this fact by trying to disprove any established concept as wrong, with your version of truth being the correct "redpilled" one.

But that is biased, so in addition to my request above, please tell me at least 5 historical books you read, since you feel qualified to speak up on the subject.


 No.42755

File: 0ae719142f2aa4b⋯.png (114.08 KB, 424x480, 53:60, 2ac.png)

File: dd7d6bf8c98c0a2⋯.png (424.87 KB, 1317x1652, 1317:1652, Iq_correlation_to_skin_col….png)

>>42751

>utterly insignificant

25 IQ difference is insignificant now. Average black IQ is 75, while retardation in whites "is defined by an IQ under 70". Utterly insignificant, amirite?

>completely irrelevant

Yep, it's all one really big, really unfortunate coincidence that all black countries are shitholes. White men and asians prevent them from developing at every step for hundreds of years.

>>42754

>all that angry strawmanning

Yikes. Nobody's going to tell you anything when you can't even have a polite discussion.


 No.42756

>>42755

Those IQ differences are largely culturally caused. There was a research about black kids in white families and white kids in white families and the IQ difference wasn't higher than 10 points

>Yep, it's all one really big, really unfortunate coincidence that all black countries are shitholes

I am going to ignore the obvious environment argument since you probably heard it before and chose to ignore it for some reason already, but if your premise is correct, why didn't Asians conquer Europe then? Statistically, they are smarter in every regard, be it IQ points, mathematical olympics results, school surveys etc. By your race theory, Asians should be supreme overlords of this planet since day 1, yet in the past two-three hundred years they were European bitches.


 No.42757


 No.42760

>>42757

You really must be retarded. Family has basically no imprinting on IQ and people tend to cluster with their biological parents' IQs.

IQ is not cultural at all, really, are you from cuckchan or anything?


 No.42761

>>42756

Because you don't know genetics or history.

Culture is a phenotype from a people's genotype, which then is reinforced in a loop by selection.

Race is extremely important because we know by a fact that society organizes by race, either with nepotism, voting patterns, collective decisions and wishes, or even shared destiny.

You would need to read just too much to understand such trends, because it seems you can't fathom them.


 No.42762


 No.42765


 No.42768

File: c84d399198b6645⋯.jpg (70.01 KB, 960x621, 320:207, his.jpg)

File: 726da71bbc482c8⋯.jpg (251.59 KB, 1199x757, 1199:757, the day that his laughed a….jpg)

it's because its saves the kid's time, nobody in /his/ since that autist raided the board knows history profesinally and we have no more specialists on topics that are not western, so when it comes to talking about not western topics, they can only say that they are not white, this goes along whit posting a bunch of papers and broken links form /pol/s pastebin.

TL;DR: people here doesnt study history and doesn't like it


 No.42769

>>42767

>>42768

>angry strawmanning again

>samefag

Pathetic.


 No.42770

>>42769

Lol u r fagget


 No.42776

>>42756

>>42765

>all links by one author

>highly controversial author that claims shit like 1000 years of development are enough to change human psychology

>uses words like "ass" or mobile phone allegories

I was going to respond to the arguments made in the article, but i found no arguments there. Just a lot of "its like this and listen to this anectodal evidence"


 No.42778

>>42776

How you don't know who he is? Do you like losing face or something?


 No.42779

Why do people like OP bring it up?


 No.42780

>>42776

>implying I don't have other takedowns of Diamond's Jew Babble

http://historycooperative.org/world-according-jared-diamond/

http://www.arthurhu.com/99/04/diamond.txt

Diamond is just another resentful Kike pinning the White Man's glory on him "cheating." It's like how President Borock Osama Obongo told Whitey "he didn't build that." Jews and other Muds have no notion of sincerely admiring a man for his success.


 No.42781

>>42779

Their ideology/narrative continues to fail or otherwise be contradicted by actuality. They cling to denying race as their last resort.


 No.42783

>>42778

I'm not American and i don't follow internet """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""academia""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" maybe that might be the reason


 No.42786

File: 86f530786d1a82a⋯.jpg (361.84 KB, 1868x2854, 934:1427, cover.jpg)

>>42783

>Those apostrophes

>"Internet Academia"

>Gregory M. Cochran (born 1953) is an American anthropologist and author who argues that cultural innovation resulted in new and constantly shifting selection pressures for genetic change, thereby accelerating human evolution and divergence between human races. From 2004 to 2015 he was a research associate at the anthropology department at the University of Utah. He is co-author of the book The 10,000 Year Explosion.

>The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution is a 2009 book by anthropologists Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending. Starting with their own take on the conventional wisdom that the evolutionary process stopped when modern humans appeared, the authors explain the genetic basis of their view that human evolution is accelerating, illustrating it with some examples.

>Henry Cosad Harpending (January 13, 1944 – April 3, 2016) was an American anthropologist, geneticist and author. He was distinguished professor at the University of Utah. Harpending received his A.B. degree from Hamilton College and his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1972. He was a member of the National Academy of Sciences.

You keep embarrassing yourself with displays of utter lack of knowledge and lack of reading.

No wonder stupid questions like OP pop up, or you say shit like you do.


 No.42787

>>42781

Which ideology to be exact?

Fascism?

Nazism?

Ancaps?

Nazbol?

Anprims?

Imperialists?

People who want to genocide all non whites?

Who the fuck exactly are you talking about?

White supremacists in general?


 No.42788

>>42787

Leftist ideologies, don't play dumb or try to be snarky.

The ideology of the left is based on fictional books no different than harry potter.

Really, just stop embarrassing yourself - you're the one who know the less among everyone here.


 No.42799

>>42786

I study humanities at university for six years now and i never heard of that book or of Jared Diamond for that matter. Admittedly it might be because i am not American, but i get the impression that lot of people on the internet get fixated on the few controversial books that get famous here because of how "ground-breaking" they are and those become the basis for any future argument, meanwhile in the actual academic town (maybe that's not the right word but u know what i mean), nobody even know those books, much less takes them seriously.

Correct me, if its any different in American academia. If you even have any concept of academia outside the internet, that is.


 No.42800

>>42751

>note that i am not saying all races are the same leftypoll bullshit, i am just stating that historical characteristics weren't caused by them in the slightest

that's exactly what you're saying, leftyshit. You think your goalpost moving is not transparent?


 No.42801

>>42799

Man, you study humanities.

Basically everything you know is wrong.

>Correct me, if its any different in American academia.

We study the same dipshits and actually export their crap talk to you.

>If you even have any concept of academia outside the internet, that is.

Wow, snarky and edgy! Do you think you're the only graduate here? We have a BO who works with genetics.

You're just a bunch of crap, that's it.


 No.42805

File: 7667cff63818014⋯.jpg (66.46 KB, 750x751, 750:751, pipe-fedora.jpg)

>>42786

>i see you attend actual schools and are not redpilled by youtube videos like me


 No.42806

>>42805

What the fuck a graduate's book have to do with youtube?

What the fuck your humanities course have to do with reality?

Shall we starting dumping papers here for you to vanish speechless? Even though we know you won't and can't read them?


 No.42807

>>42806

>dumping papers

>vanish speechless

yeah dude, roast this guy!


 No.42808

>>42806

Please do dump some papers.

>What the fuck your humanities course have to do with reality?

this whole thread is based around humanities for example. Also i generalized with "humanities", i might specify that my actual subject is history, and from what i learned throughout my studies is that every event in history was caused by some previous trends, financial situation, cultural development, other circumstances, but i NEVER encountered any instance of an event caused by race, even though i acknowledge the difference between races.

I'm saying this because we are degressing and i'd like to point out, that if you look at the OP, this was the whole point of my thread. You fags claiming "X happened because of race Y", which is complete utter bullshit.


 No.42813

>>42808

You're looking at it on the surface, things go deeper than that.

subSaharan Africans have low IQ, have we seen anything technologically worth while coming out of subSaharan Africa? no we have not, maybe because on average they're simply less intelligent. it's as simple as that.

Everywhere around the world, where niggers go crime follows suit, i've never seen an example of the contrary.

Sure these examples are just correlations, but damn if there's a lot of those.

I mean we have significant differences, over time, over tens of thousands of years, how could they NOT amount to anything?


 No.42814

>>42813

I am pretty sure you heard this thousand times before, but i'm gonna bite and write all this out again

First, everything in history has its cause, there is undeniable cause and consequence relationship with every event in human history. Now if you look at technological achievements in history, there are generally considered to be two main causes: The accumulation of information, and what could be simply described as the advancement of middle class. Accumulation of information doesn't really deserve further explanation, but i'd like to specify the advancement of middle class to explain how important it really is.

For example, if i take textile industry. For most of history, the textiles were made from wool on the order of nobles and by the common folks specialized in the craft. Since common folk didn't really have a choice in the matter, they are out of the equation and you are left with nobles. Now there are two reasons why nobles achieved immeasurably less technological advancement. First one being their financial security. They had their way of doing things and exploring new way, trying out new things was 1. looked down upon by the rest and 2. there was no reason for it. I know i'm generalizing a lot, but nobles (generally) lived in luxury (for their time) and had no need to try out new things. And the second reason why nobles achieved far less was simply their numbers. Plainly said, 1% of the population has ten times lesser chance to discover new things than 10% of population.

On the other hand, if you consider the demographic situation after the situation after ~1600 when due to other factors, the wealth started to be distributed more equally among the people, creating the middle class we know today, you suddenly have a significantly larger percentage of the population who has wealth to spare at their disposal. And these people are not secure in their wealth, they have no land, no people given them by birth, they have no guarantee to remain wealthy like the nobles. So this new class starts experimenting. And that's how technological ideas are not just born, because thats the first step, but most importantly, financed.

Now to just sum up why Africa didn't have this. First is the accumulation of information. African lands are inhospitable, hard to navigate, hard to get through and as a result of this, decisive majority of non-coastal Africa was cut off from the rest of the civilization for majority of history. Meanwhile Europeans got the inventions from China thanks to Mongol expansion, while Europeans had all the information from Middle East civilizations, from India, from most of the world, majority of Africa had nothing, which itself explains a lot about why 99% of them were living in mudhuts until 20th century.

But now to consider the coastal Africans like in Guinea (since those are the only one i know about, never really read up on the rest). Since 1600, they had the access to the "world's informations" (let me emphasise that only since 1600. Even at first contacts, Portugese were very careful to not give them any information about guns, so they would keep the technological upper hand and earlier on, the coastal areas were easy to reach but VERY hard to sail away from due to the shitty winds caused by Sahara), but their problem was unironically slavery.

Let's return to the middle class here. Rise of the middle class in Europe was caused by trade, I think we can agree on that. In 17th century there was actually a MASSIVE increase in wealth of the middle class in Guinea, because of opening of trade with Europe thanks to fall of Portugese monopoly. As expected, this was accompanied by huge increase in technological advancement, guns because prevalent almost instantly, there were new mining procedures introduced some Africans even started building their own manufacturies.

But slave trade was a massive hit. First of all, simply because of the population hit. Its no exagaration that 30% of the population of Guinea was lost to the slave trade, even though this population loss was countered by introduction of maze and other New World crops. But the slave trade was mostly organized by the kings. Originally the middle men (middle class traders) were involved, but eventually kings learned the profitability of the trade and butted in, and by the end of 18th century, trade was basically only in their hands (i'm too lazy to justify this, just look this up if you don't trust me).

What this caused was accumulation of all the wealth from trade into the hands of kings and basically cutting out the middle class from the trade completely.

Since this is getting long af and i'm getting lazy to write out the details, i'll end simply

TLDR: African low technological advancement was caused by their inability to access world information pool and later on by slave trade fucking over middle class.


 No.42815

>>42814

>I am ignoring how big of a shithole the Middle-East and South America is

>I am denying that Japan and other Far Eastern lands are far less garbage then Niggerland and Achmedland and Beanerland despite their lack of resources compared with them


 No.42816

>>42815

South america isnt central america to be called a shithole (Ecuador, Peru Argentina and Chile arent not africa tier) and countries like Iran arent that bad.


 No.42819

>>42813

I was just talking about technological innovations, not about quality of life.


 No.42820

>>42819

God damn i keep failing at quoting

meant for >>42815


 No.42826

>>42814

>African low technological advancement was caused by their inability to access world information pool and later on by slave trade fucking over middle class.

Couldn't they have developed their own?, weren't they connected to the rest of the world through the Indian ocean? what about modern times? haven't they had enough time to develop?

Can your example about guinea be applied to the rest of Africa?

What about the mesoamericans? they were way way more isolated than Africans yet achieved far more and could have achieved more if the plague hadn't killed 90% of them.

What makes you think evolution stopped at the neck in humans? or do you acknowledge the difference in intelligence? and if you do, how could that not make an impact in their development?


 No.42835

>>42826

>couldn't they develop their own

I guarantee that if you wouldn't have any contact with any other human in your life, you would never even think of something as simple as a wheel. Inventing stuff is not easy.

>weren't they connected to the rest of the world through the Indian ocean?

Unfortunately i don't know shit about pre-modern Somalis or Swahilis so i can't talk about them, but anything south of Cape Bojador and west Cape of Good Hope was pretty much cut off except of the occasional land caravan or two. Nothing on the level of Mediterranean trade, Arab trade or Silk Road

>what about modern times? haven't they had enough time to develop?

Its just 58 years since their independence and they spent two thirds of that time being engulfed by Cold War, they definitely didn't have enough time yet. But its slowly getting better now.

>Can your example about guinea be applied to the rest of Africa?

I'm not sure about the contact with the rest of the world, but definitely the thing about the middle class. Not just Africa, but the whole world was pretty much the same, with huge social differences and non-existent middle class.

>What about the mesoamericans?

My humble opinion is that Mesoamericans are overhyped. Africans also had astronomy, mathematics, agriculture, big cities and huge palaces, we just like to focus on ancient Aztects because they are more mysterious. But i'm not really sure here because i honestly don't know anything about astronomy or mathematics so its hard for me to compare.

>What makes you think evolution stopped at the neck in humans? or do you acknowledge the difference in intelligence? and if you do, how could that not make an impact in their development?

There are undoubted differences in intellect, i'm not denying that, but the difference is like 5-10 IQ at most, which barely makes any real impact. If you compare a person with 110 IQ and 120 IQ, they will be pretty much equal in decisive most of their activities.


 No.42840

>>42751

You're 100% correct if you're referring to Arabs and "Chinese", both of which were a lot more civilised and scientifically advanced than whitoids for centuries.

Do you not find it terribly convenient that the only people lacking Neanderthal DNA are black Africans and small tribal peoples like Australian aboriginals?


 No.42847

>>42840

>You're 100% correct if you're referring to Arabs and "Chinese", both of which were a lot more civilised and scientifically advanced than whitoids for centuries.

I'll wait for you to name a single discovery or invention under Islam that wasn't done by Jews or Christians (who don't have the Nigger blood of their Muslim neighbors) or Persians (who are Indo-European).


 No.42848

>>42847

Christian/Jew/Muslim isn't a race. Let's stick to genetics.

How about the lateen sail? That's a pretty important invention. Without it, there would be no "Age of Discovery".

The muslim world has made innumerable advancements and contributions toward modern biological, agricultural and mathematical knowledge. I couldn't possibly identify the specifics of each contributor's individual sand-niggardry levels.

I'll concede that white people made better use of these innovations, as with the sail above, or with the gunpowder we got from the Chinese. But we're at Neanderthal DNA ground zero, of course we did.


 No.42850

File: 1bce7e4d67ada2d⋯.gif (68.09 KB, 493x609, 17:21, Descartes_mind_and_body.gif)

>>42848

There is also the problem that race as an explanation for scientific advancements doesnt explain how scientific advancements are made, even in western europe there during the centuries there were nations who were more favorable for science than others, most advancements during the englithement era were made by lower nobles or the offsprings of rich artisans, take Descartes or the Bernoulli family, these people always needed some noble financing their works, maybe the diversity of nobles in the HRE (you might remember that german noble that collected String instruments, you had a variety of germanic nobles) and the rise of a merchant/artisan strata helped to start the englightement era, in contrast of China were academic institutions were limited to confusianism studies and technical schoolings that served to train state bureocrats and artisans limited to technical stuff along whit being loyal to the state, even the entrance exam measured loyalty and knowledge of confusianism. But during the Ming dinasty (this is after the red turbant rebellion), Neo-Confusianism was promoted by the state, which was like a rationa approach to confusianism, it seems that this stopped during the Qing dinasty (it is a guess, i haven't found much material on this topic).


 No.42851

>>42848

>Christian/Jew/Muslim isn't a race. Let's stick to genetics.

Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the MENA are genetically separate from each-other. Different levels of inbreeding also.

>How about the lateen sail? That's a pretty important invention. Without it, there would be no "Age of Discovery".

Even a cucked out source like Wikipedia doubts that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateen

> The origin of the lateen sail has often been attributed by scholars to the Indian Ocean and its introduction into the Mediterranean traditionally ascribed to the Arab expansion of the early-7th century. This was due mainly to the earliest (at that time) iconographic depictions of lateen rigged ships from the Mediterranean post-dating the Islamic expansion into the Mediterranean basin… It was assumed that the Arab people who invaded the Mediterranean basin in the 7th century carried with them the sailing rig familiar to them. Such theories have been superseded by unequivocal depictions of lateen-rigged Mediterranean sailing vessels which pre-date the Arab invasion.[26][27]

>The muslim world has made innumerable advancements and contributions toward modern biological, agricultural and mathematical knowledge. I couldn't possibly identify the specifics of each contributor's individual sand-niggardry levels.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Setting_the_Record_Straight_-_The_Non-Miracle_of_Islamic_Science

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Arab_Transmission_of_the_Classics

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/How_Islamic_Inventors_Did_Not_Change_The_World

Read these and come back.

>>42850

Go look up the list of noble prize winners in actual science and STEM representation. The list is going to be really male and really White (The listed Jews are mongrels, they aren't proper Sandniggers).


 No.42852

>>42851

>Go look up the list of noble prize winners in actual science and STEM representation.

I am talking about history, also you are not counting how easy is too perform research in the EU thanks to the academic networks beetwen institutions. Still i am talking about the caucasian world, even beetwen cacucasian countries they had nations more advanced than others (Saxons before the Norman invasion, as an example), what i am trying to point is what is the favorable context for science to flourish. Also consider that it doesnt matter if advancements are made first but they are not widespread.


 No.42853

>>42852

Tell us more on how evolution stopped from the neck down.


 No.42854

>>42840

>You're 100% correct if you're referring to Arabs and "Chinese", both of which were a lot more civilised and scientifically advanced than whitoids for centuries.

Holy crap, laugh at this imbecile.

>Do you not find it terribly convenient that the only people lacking Neanderthal DNA are black Africans and small tribal peoples like Australian aboriginals?

Africans have Neanderthal DNA. And Australian Aborigines have the highest levels of such.


 No.42856

>>42835

Considering Africans have lived in very limited to no civilization, perhaps their psychology has not developed properly to live in one.

>Inventing stuff is not easy.

Yet every other civilization did more than them.

>Unfortunately i don't know shit about pre-modern Somalis or Swahilis so i can't talk about them, but anything south of Cape Bojador and west Cape of Good Hope was pretty much cut off except of the occasional land caravan or two. Nothing on the level of Mediterranean trade, Arab trade or Silk Road

Even the connected Africans have amounted to almost nothing, certainly a bit more than in the interior of Africa but still not much, even if they were part of the silk route trade.

>Its just 58 years since their independence and they spent two thirds of that time being engulfed by Cold War, they definitely didn't have enough time yet.

Bullshit, other parts of the world suffered far more and in less time have developed a lot more, one hears that excuse again and again for why African nations have been starving since independence yet other nations that started under the same or worse circumstances are thriving now. They had a lot of things left by Europeans that they just destroyed and wasted, then they ask the rest of the world the western world for aid.

>But its slowly getting better now.

Not because of their own doing, as always seems any development in Africa is payed for and developed by outsiders.

>My humble opinion is that Mesoamericans are overhyped. Africans also had astronomy, mathematics, agriculture, big cities and huge palaces, we just like to focus on ancient Aztects because they are more mysterious. But i'm not really sure here because i honestly don't know anything about astronomy or mathematics so its hard for me to compare.

The point is that they accomplished more despite being way more isolated, so isolation by itself is not a good explanation.

>There are undoubted differences in intellect, i'm not denying that, but the difference is like 5-10 IQ at most, which barely makes any real impact. If you compare a person with 110 IQ and 120 IQ, they will be pretty much equal in decisive most of their activities.

I'm pretty sure the differences were bigger, but even so, we're not comparing 2 guys, we're comparing millions across millennia, what starts as a small difference can make a big one after enough time, especially with the kind of feedback loops we see in history and evolution.


 No.42866

File: e29a93deed08e67⋯.jpg (100.89 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, Pachacutec-1.jpg)

>>42751

Because Amerindian higher civilization potential is a historical fact, and europigs replacing Amerindians with inferior beings with lesser civilization potential has to be known by every worthy being alive.

>europeans

>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)

>from aurignacian-antelian to start of crop development: 9000 years(30000BC-21000BC)

>from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 10500 years (21000BC-10500BC)

>from neolithic revolution to copper furnaces: 5000 years (10500BC-5500BC)

>from neolithic revolution to tin bronze metallurgy: 6000 years (10500BC-4500BC)

>Amerindians:

>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 5500 years (16000BC-10500BC)

>from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 5000 years (16000BC-11000BC)

>from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 7000 years (11000BC-4000BC)

>from neolithic revolution to copper furnaces: 3300 years (4000BC-700BC)

>from neolithic revolution to tin bronze metallurgy: 4700 years (4000BC-700 AD)

-"2003a. Tiwanaku Period (Middle Horizon) bronze metallurgy in the lake Titicaca basin: A preliminary assessment. En Tiwanaku and its hinterland, T 2. A. Kolata, (Ed.), pp. 404-434. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C."

-"1997. El bronce arsenical y el Horizonte Medio. En Arqueología, antropología e historia en los Andes: Homenaje a María Rostworowski, R. Varón y J. Flores E. (Eds.), pp. 153-186. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima."

-"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317346941_Ancient_metalworking_in_South_America_A_3000-year-old_copper_mask_from_the_Argentinian_Andes";

-"Historia de América Andina: Las sociedades aborígenes"

-"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02859340";

-"http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141923";

-"http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1873/";

-"https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoamericano";

-"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluefish_Caves";

How is this hard to get?


 No.42868

>>42866

Please, don't talk anymore, you're just a fool that tries to cope with low self-esteem by clinging to fairy tales.


 No.42936

>>42851

>The listed Jews are mongrels, they aren't proper Sandniggers

not white either


 No.42968

>>42936

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for looking down on mixing with Jews (the consequences of which are obvious), but you have to call a spade a spade, European admixture in Ashkenazi Jews is in general huge, in some population greater than 50%+, they're definitely not niggers. And last I looked, the argument of OP is that race doesn't matter, not that whites aren't smarter than Jews, Jewish success in academia is the exact opposite of evidence that Negroids don't have lesser general intelligence. How could Jews possibly compete academically with negroes in raw numbers if they were intellectually indistinct? The black population even in the western world dwarfs the Jewish population. If your answer to that is that they don't have money (mo gibs makes me smarter'n shieeet) or that racism be keepin' the african einsteins down, then just give up, you're a joke.


 No.42975

>>42856

if you are wondering why nobody is responding its because your stupidity is too much to bear


 No.42976

>>42866

You are one of the few racists here to provide some arguments so i'm going to properly respond

1st of all i'd say that Amerindian high "civilization potential" as you call it is because of their crops. Ignoring rice, new world crops are the most nutritious and healthy in the whole world and that itself is a MASSIVE advantage to any civilization there. And yes, i know they were altered by humans but same attempts at altering were tried anywhere in the world including Subsaharan africa but no other crop was so prone to the altering like potatoes or maze/corn. And these crops had a very pleasant environment to grow in, supremely fertile soil and not too much rain.

I shouldn't even have to go any further, having nutrient crops is an enormous advantage that itself would explain Mesoamerican success without looking for any racial excuses.

But what i'd like to point out further would be easy-to-extract suitable materials in Mesoamerica as for building as for smithing (tbph i read this in few books and quick internet search confirmed that they had suitable materials available but i can't for the love of god find the name of those minerals)


 No.42978

File: 514d37665ecb4fd⋯.png (407.79 KB, 680x560, 17:14, iiud.png)


 No.42979

>>42976

>You are one of the few racists here to provide some arguments

You live in a reversed world, no arguing here.


 No.43089

>>42816

>Ecuador, Peru Argentina and Chile

Yeah but most of those countries have a white-jewish upper class managin everything mestizos are for the most part the majority of the low class


 No.43198

>>42751

>Why are you people like this?

because we aren't afraid of the backlash and because here you don't get swarmed by a bunch of triggered lysenkoits like in cuck/his/


 No.43217

File: 84ba957ae2a8e53⋯.jpg (8.79 KB, 168x300, 14:25, IMG_20190213_210559.jpg)


 No.43229

It's because one of the driving forces of civilizations throughout history, culture, often gets confounded with race.


 No.43230

>>43229

Whatever you say, Jared Diamond/leftypol. When will you start the Kangz Memes?


 No.43231

>>43230

If you disagree with leftards, they'll call you a nazi.

If you disagree with a /pol/fag, they'll call you leftypol/tyrone.

Two sides of the same coin.


 No.43233

>>43231

>Insulting people is a common denominator

>Being this retarded


 No.43234

Make Love to Children for Peace Christian Ministries Inc.


 No.43236

>>43230

Nice reply, if you had comprehended what I said you would have realized that I'm saying that some cultures are inherently superior to others, regardless of a society's situation in the world, unlike the views Jared Diamond.

Why are you even coming here if you're not going to read what other people are saying and are just going to screech at anyone you think disagrees with you?


 No.43238

>>43236

>muh culcha

Tell us more on how your environment has nothing to do with your capabilities.


 No.43267

>>43238

>People have no free will/initiative

>If you're born in a shitty place you can't better yourself.

Sounds like the argument of someone in the ghetto, protip, Hard to do =/= impossible

No please, continue to strawman in an attempt to "own" all the ebil rayciss nahtzees, im sure your (((Professor))) would be proud of you.


 No.43269

>culture this, culture that

>everything is determined entirely by culture

t. the entire media in the entire western world


 No.43271

>>43267

Are humans animals Y/N

Do some animals have different capabilities than other animals regardless of how they were raised Y/N


 No.43275

>>43236

Cultures might be superior, nobody is denying that. But races aren't. The difference between biological races is very small overall.


 No.43276

>>43275

Wait i just read what you actually wrote

>some cultures are inherently superior to others, regardless of a society's situation in the world

I think you might be retarded now


 No.43277

File: 19be7b490c1bcbc⋯.png (299.14 KB, 1106x844, 553:422, pca.png)

Different human races are often 99,9% genetically like each other. The sapiens were 99,7% like the Neanderthal.

Humans are 95~98% like chimpanzees.

Humans are 60% like Bananas.

Tiny differences in DNA have huge consequences.

Also, we're in a state where some human populations are almost becoming different species. The fst between Papuans and Pigmies is 0,375 which is almost like what we had with the Sapiens/Neanderthal.

Hell, Pigmies have separated genetically from all the rest of humanity 300,000 years ago - that's exactly the time it took for the H. heidelbergensis to diverge into Sapiens and Neanderthal.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / chori / choroy / cyoa / dempart / lovelive / vietnam / vore ]