Does anyone find it odd that the religion of Europe is in fact almost entirely a Semitic religion?
Europeans seem to be the only people whose religion is based on the family history of an entirely different, separate race of people. It would be like Nigerians studying the history of Ethiopia rather than their own history. (European history is told, but not at a young age and not deemed religious or spiritual. Europeans are taught as children the history of Jews like David and Goliath, but never ancient stories of their own homelands of Britain, etc.)
The common story is that Christianity was just so darn persuasive that millions of Europeans converted to it, which doesn't make sense because that has never happened before. Mass conversions have only happened as a side effect of conquest.
Given the assumption of secret Jewish power that I have just become aware of and many of us discuss on chans, it leads to an interesting possibility: Jewish influence was actually much greater throughout even ANCIENT history.
I have an alternative theory, which is that Christianity was spread concomitantly with the migration of Jews into Europe. Christianity was essentially a slave/peasant religion, similar to how the lower classes have their cults and gods in the Hindu caste system. It supplanted native religions because the Jews supplanted the upper classes of Europe, and the Jews preferred to have a slave religion based on their own religion. Perhaps they were even financially linked to one another.
It is a common idea that Christianity is a slave religion and I believe Nietzche explained it well in line with what I believe. One piece of evidence for this is the fact that Judaism is more ethno-centric, and essentially is a family line as well as being a religion. My addition to his theory is that it is NOT an accident that Christianity is a slave religion. It truly is because Christians are the slaves.
There is no reason for millions of Europeans to drop their native religions unless some kind of conquest occurred.