>>55
It wasn't a split. Take it from someone who spends time on both boards.
/leftypol/ is the sad misguided result of self-fulfilling prophecy and just by existing lends itself to a false dichotomy.
/pol/ as a board does not cater to any political ideology. The myth that right wing thinking/extremism is catered to is nothing more than a myth. If you can back up your own ideas when they are confronted, i.e. handle the banter, then you will easily fit right in because ideas and viewpoints are constantly clashing. Lurkers and posters alike can take away from the discussion variety of point of views, not simply one or a few political standpoints.
But then there's /leftypol/. On /leftypol/ it explicitly stands for leftist thinking. Paradoxically, or just for the sake of a disclaimer, its faq states that non-leftists are welcome, but specifically welcome to debate. Thus, it is expected for non-leftists to come in and oppose views, not simply discuss them. >>>/leftypol/86800
>so non-leftists have to be on better behavior as OP than they do as participants in someone else's thread
These are the expectations of outside posters. So now I ask, which one is the hugbox again? Which one is supposed to be the echochamber? /leftypol/ easily falls into that trap, but there are some redeeming qualities - but they happen to be revolve around other weaknesses.
Incidentally, SJW discussion benefits from being on a board based on where SJWs come from, i.e. leftist thinking. One way to view this is effect is, it takes one to know one and keeps them aware of pitfalls that lead back to modern radical leftists (SJWs). Thus, /leftypol/ has the potential to redeem leftism by cleansing itself of what has caused the left to become so cancerous. They could achieve this but the first steps they should take is by distancing themselves from simply being part of a false dichotomy. Obsessing over their needless polarization towards /pol/ does nothing but inspirePost too long. Click here to view the full text.