/int/ - 72% opinion

Better than any other republican.

well who are the alternatives to Trump? two establishment spics, a dopey nigger, and a nobody governor. and on the democrats it's a communist kike, and a psychopathic woman

>>321347

what he's said so far is pretty good, and he's suggesting greater things. I suspect he's hiding his power level from the normies

>>321361

>what he's said so far is pretty good, and he's suggesting greater things. I suspect he's hiding his power level from the normies

True, but there's a chance he's all fluff and no substance. Regardless, I'm sort of excited at the prospect of him making full use of the bully pulpit to make congress do what he wants.

I was talking about politics with my family and they brought up the "Trump will be a dictator" card. While I agree on that being a real possibility, I asked them how in the worst case scenario he's going to be any different from Hillary who my mum supports. Well, my dad said Trump wants to be a cunt but Hillary just is a cunt without even knowing it. My mum said Hillary can't be a dictator because she's a woman and women are forced to submit to the universe's benevolent powers by childbirth, so women are by definition victims and no matter what she does, the patriarchy will remain since women don't have the heroic strength to fuck things up, and even if she did manage to start a civil war, she would be the primary victim… I cringed.

It should not surprise anyone that my mum is the kind of woman who believes that in domestic abuse cases the woman is always the victim even if she's the one abusing the man, and that if the man calls the police he should be taken to jail because at that point it's only a matter of time before he becomes the abuser. She's also adamant that retroactive withdrawal of consent is a basic human right, but only for women because the man has the penis and he puts it in the woman's vagina so by definition the second he puts the penis in the vagina, he has violated the woman's basic human right of equality since the penetration is a substitute for violence and the woman is a victim of rape whether she likes it or not, whether she wanted the sex or not, because the man's penis is a weapon of war against the woman's fragile vagina. It's a woman's basic human right to turn on a sexual partner in favour of a better sexual partner because if the previous sexual partner can't protect her from the competition, then it's only a matter of time before he turns on her and rapes and kills her in the most sadistic and violent way he can think of, at which point the other men in the community will join him and they'll all rape the woman together…

My dad on the other hand thinks that all women who wear anything even remotely revealing are secretly wanting to be fucked by a strong man who can dominate them and put them back to their place, and if they complain about it then they deserve to be killed since they're defying the laws of nature. I have no idea how the two of them got together or how they can spend more than five minutes in the same room but somehow they do it, but of course neither of them is happy and they're constantly blaming each other for everything that is wrong with my life (that I'm a NEET who still lives at home, that I'm a virgin, my beliefs, etc.) and it's really annoying. My dad is a militaristic right wing atheist ex-Communist who wants religion to be banned altogether but to apply Islamic rules in society without belief in God, and my mum is a pacifistic left wing liberal Muslim ex-Communist who wants all religions to have equal representation but to abolish all religious rules in society with belief in God. They're so opposite, it's insane.

>>321375

I don't find it suprising that Albania has the lowest average IQ in Europe.

I'm highly interested and excited to see him in power. He'd have a more pragmatic foreign policy and a way better handling of immigration. What worries me, though, is that he cares little about privacy (NSA and all) and, most importantly, his leftist economic policies would have a significant chance of fucking the American economy and raising the cost of industrialized products as everything will have to be bought from American workers loaded with labour rights instead of cheap Chinese slave labour.

Still, it'd be far more exciting to watch than seeing Shillary get elected and America getting more of the same (niggers becoming increasingly restless, gun rights being taken away, political correctness prevailing).

>>321385

Islam does wonders

>>321387

>American economy and raising the cost of industrialized products as everything will have to be bought from American workers loaded with labour rights instead of cheap Chinese slave labour.

If I understand what he's getting at (and who the fuck knows because he really hasn't provided many specifics) is that he's only really interested in engaging in protectionist policies in the US itself, which is to say that products being imported here will be more expensive, but it would only effect world markets indirectly. You'll still be able to buy cheap shit from China, but the tariffs/other regulations will make it more expensive in the US proper. Also, being as pretty much the only major exports from the US are raw materials and agricultural products, I'd say that the change of their price shouldn't effect Brazilian markets all that much, given how those are Brazil's primary exports, as well. In fact, if those goods coming out of the US increase in price, the once coming out of Brazil should be in greater demand, so that's good news for you!

>privacy (NSA and all)

Yeah, that is one part of him I'm not a huge fan of. That being said, If he's not a globalist, the spying is less worrying.

>>321375

Another beautiful /int/ post. Somebody screencap this for posterity.

Don't think it's gonna matter to me.

Would rather the U.S. not have a president that wants more wars in the Middle East.

It's entertaining what's going on in the GOP, and seeing him become POTUS is gonna be one hell of a thing to watch.

But still, if I had to choose, I'd rather have the Jew as the president.

>>321342

I really, really want him to win.

Just so that every trump shilling idiot on /pol/ will be disappointed at what he does in office. He's a reality star billionaire who cheated on his wife and is basically a living caricature of the 1%, and just 8 years after 2008 no one cares about his business practices, wealth or extravagance.

>>321393

All candidates are shit as usual but people who actually believe in Trump's bare-faced bluffs are retards

>>321393

All candidates are shit as usual but people who actually believe in Trump's bare-faced bluffs are retards

>>321392

> I'd rather have the Jew as the president.

Typical Zionist Saudi puppet.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>321393

/pol/acks have enough independent thinking to avoid the PC consensus, but at their core they're still a bunch of easily impressionable young men who blindly believe in any random populist with vague promises of tearing down the establishment and giving them money, just like Bernie and Reddit.

Besides the "we'll reach paradise if we just wipe out the rats and establish this magical statist formula!" ideal, shared with the democrat jew, people also flock to him because of his tough attitude. I understand this, though. I myself love this aspect of Trump, and have heard Hold Back the Night from beginning to end several times. The US doesn't need shy cuckservatives too scared to question political correctness. But an obsession with personal power is negative to democracy in the long term.

I particularly cringe when I see some of them thinking he'll be some sort of 21st century Hitler, becoming a dictator and gassing the kikes (as if he'd kill his own qt daughter). Trump may know of his alt-right fanbase (retweeting a white genocide account, buying ads in 8chan, etc), but he's hardly a white nationalist, is surrounded by Jews and sometimes says very un-NatSoc things like "I'm the least racist person you've ever met". /pol/ will, of course, do extensive mental gymnastics to pretend he's just faking it and is a true National Socialist, but this theory doesn't hold quite well to Occam's Razor.

In the end, though, how would a Trump presidency look like? I have no idea. I doubt he's an idiotic buffoon like the shills want us to believe, but even if he's competent his proposed economic policies have a high chance of fucking things up.

I'd still vote for him over a Democrat any time.

>>321342

Funny. They are just puppets anyway.

Let's see

He is a racist, xenophobe. He mocks the disabled. He is a blatant mysogynist that calls women pigs and makes jokes about wanting to rape his daughter and how he cheats on his wife. He thinks he is the new Hitler and that his brownshirts will let him milk the country dry giving hand outs to all his friends, wishes he was born a member of the tribe but will settle for marrying one and having all his kids marry them.

He will start WWIII and reduce the people of the US into slaves for his buddies and shuffle them all off into ethically divided camps.

He is a liar, flip flops on every issue, he threatens anyone that doesn't give him what he wants.

He is everything bad about this shithole of a country. The rest of the world better pray the mouth breathing redneck faggots that fill the spaces between the coasts don't elect him, or the entire world will suffer.

Also he has a shitty combover and a small penis.

>>321375

Ain't that some shit

>>321404

How's California fam?

>>321416

I used to vote for Trump all the time, but then he said that one politically incorrect thing and that was it, man. How could I keep voting for him after that? No way, I just wouldn't be able to remain intellectually honest. I had to stop voting for Trump cold turkey. Now I'm a CruzMissile. I vote for Cruz every day. Cruz is the only Clear Consistent Credible Capable Certified Courageously Classy Confident Cuban Conservative Christian Constitutionalist Can-do Candidate from the Cold Cloudy Cannabis Capital City of Canada Called Calgary.

If you disagree, then you're a JIDF shill on the wrong side of memestory. Just look at all the hip Cruz memes. There's that one shirtless pic of Cruz where he has all the cool tattoos, and there's that other pic where he's driving while holding a gun, and I'm sure there are other Cruz memes on the deep web…many believe Cruz was the photographer at Rubio's bubble party. There's no solid evidence that he wasn't, so it's obvious he was the one taking the pics while Chris Christie ate loudly in the background which made Ben Carson wake from his nap and notice JEB playing russian roulette while Carly Fiorina fingerbanged herself until she squirted all over Rand Paul's new khaki pants causing him to spill his plate of spaghetti on a white polo shirt he'd borrowed from his father.

So let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Ted Cruz isn't qualified to be meme president. He has at least two memes, maybe three. Ted Cruz is undertaking an effort to change memes, to make memes more dank than ever before. So let's dispel with this fiction that Ted Cruz doesn't know what memes are. He knows exactly what memes are. and here's the bottom line. This notion that Ted Cruz doesn't have any memes…

>2016

>thinking voting matters

Even if trump wins he will do nothing. Even though the purpose of our constitution was to prevent it, our government is the most complicated in the world. It's impossible to track every transaction, our laws are impossible to understand, especially because there are so many of them. Every bill contains hundreds of unrelated clauses. No one can know the whole picture. In a few years we are going to have so many legal niggers and spics that the republican party will never win again. It'll be a one party democracy, wew. I just hope someone legalized heroin before I hit 40 so I can go peacefully.

>>321399 (truth dubs)

>>321428

this is a spicy pasta

>>321442

The Republican establishment will simply move left and pander to spics over time, thus keeping their 49% share of the vote.