>>321572
>implying I ever implied that
So you're saying genital mutilation is "synonymous with Islamic religious practice". I hope you're a hormonal teenage fedora because if not, you're a disgrace to humanity. I never denied that it's a huge problem in Islamic societies. I know it is. But it's also a problem in Christian societies and animistic societies. In fact, there's no matter what the religion is. It's all about a fucked up standard of "cleanliness" that stupid people have come up with because they're stupid. It's really that simple. If I had the authority and influence to decide how it should be dealt with, I'd say kill every single person who has ever ignored the problem of genital mutilation — I don't mean in the feminist bullshit sense, activism and protesting does nothing; I mean it in the sense that if someone has the opportunity to prevent an instance of genital mutilation and they refuse it, they should be killed; not those who are ignorant of its existence or who have never had a practical chance to do anything about it. But I'm not in a position of authority like that. And if I was, I'd extend it to male circumcision as well, albeit not in cases where it's voluntary as an adult or performed for medial reasons such as phimosis.
>>321580
>>321585
I'm not a Muslim. I pity Muslims for their ignorance and hatred, just like I pity Christians and Jews. They're suffering meaninglessly and can't even admit it to themselves or each other, and they dedicate their entire lives to spreading hatred and ignorance to the rest of the world. They're a cancer on humanity, but there is no cure for cancer. You can treat it with radiation and surgery, but it will always come back in the end. No matter how many Abrahamic believers you treat, you won't be able to cure them. If there was such a simple solution, it would be to kill all Muslims, Christians, Jews and adherents of other Abrahamic religions, but that's never going to happen. Even if it did, it wouldn't be permanent because there would always be more of them to come. I don't know how the problem should be dealt with, and that's the problem. No one knows how to fix the world and cure stupidity. It just isn't possible for everyone to be rational, to have religion as a personal support beam or a private practice. There will always be people who want others to stop liking things they don't like and doing things they don't do. Ironically, it also applies to you and me; we want genital mutilation to end, but objectively speaking, what authority do we have to condemn it? I'm not saying we should ignore it, definitely, but we can't go about it the way our ancestors would have done because if we do, we're the bad guys. That's fucked up and it is indeed a genocide — not a white genocide, mind you, but a European cultural genocide — but that's the status quo. To change it, we need to rise above it. I don't know how to do that. In the US, Trump could well be the first step towards the solution, but there will never be anyone like him anywhere in Europe.
>>321584
That's exactly how it works. They'll also treat the woman as they would a rape victim, even in cases where she was the initiator of the incestuous relationship because feminism.
>>321586
And why exactly is any of that a bad thing unless you're a Christcuck, a Mohammedan or a Jew? Morality is a human invention. As much as we may like our morality, it's still objectively useless and harmful to our own societies since it prevents citisens from doing what they want to be, from them being truly free. I'm not going to deny that I find it gross to fuck a dead body or someone you're related to, or a child, but what authority do we have to stop others from doing those things just because we don't like them? The only problems I personally have with necrophilia and incest are ones to do with health, but those wouldn't be issues if there was no reason for them to be kept hidden.