/intcraftx/ - New IP: intcraft.eu

>medieval setting is the only thing people have always agreed is the best option

>wants a tfc-tier Dirt Age setting

what a downy :/

why crops

>>1875

>>1875

its jus ta pain in the ass for buildfags, mud huts and anyone who wants any culture in their nations

>>1883

general area it would make sense for the server to be cut off at, there's those fucks that just screw off to asia and dont be relevant. it makes more sense, as globalization wasn't a thing at these times

>>1871

this tbh except 1066 :^)

not even meme would be ebig

>>1884

what sense that makes

>franks have half of their territory cropped

>>1871

>>1872

>systematically cropping Switzerland out

>>1903

kek dave, im sure we could move the crop it to include the alps in 100 BC Mediterranean and 800 ad map.

>>1900

idk, the great heathen army would give memeraiders a casus beilli

>>1901

yeah, i rethought and im moving south to switzerland

This would be some top shit

At this time i think England was divided into:

Alban(picts), Alt Clut(irish in scottish lowlands) Northumbra, Mierce, East Engle, West Seaxe and some other christian kingdoms. And ireland had nearly as many kings. Also you got the Frisians and Franks and the Danes and Norwegians up top.

You are all complaining about how the server cant be RP, well now any nation can attack another without any RP dillemma. For example instead of norse and Japan being at war 1k bc it would be in a realistic distance.

And if people want to RP as khalifate its not completely absurd that the muslims make their way through france and into the mix. Also you have German kingdoms if we want to include that.

>>1925

>>1924

I doubt Chien will make another map like this

also

>no china

>no nippon

>no animu waifus

we already have a thread for this

>>1727

>>1727

>>1727

>>1727

>>1727

>>1727

sage

>>1900

It would not be ebig

It would be memes and memes alone

>>1923

>muslims make their way through france and into the mix

wut

>world map

>small

>general ancient time period

>>1960

>small map

enjoy reset after 2 weeks

>>1960

shh

>>1960

>world map

minus amerimeme

>small

large, europe enlarged even more so

>ancient

definitely no earlier than 1000 ad.

nt beefie

>>1960

>world map

minus amerimeme

>small

large, europe enlarged even more so

>ancient

definitely no earlier than 1000 ad.

nt beefie

>>1966

why no earlier than 1000 ad lol ?

>>1966

>>1967

>AD

kill self

>setting a definite year

kill self

>wanting a large map which has never worked and just makes nations seem more like city states than actually controlling the entire area of land they should

kill self

>>1977

>not setting a definite year

kill yourself non RP scum

>>1977

>>wanting a large map which has never worked and just makes nations seem more like city states than actually controlling the entire area of land they should

>beef

>large map

>didn't work

yeah because 3.0 with 2x larger map didn't work at all

>makes nations seem more like city states

how stupid can you be, like literally, you make towns there and they should look as town and do not occupy 1/2 of real life country territory kek

if you want to control more territory, build more towns fagget

>>1978

>implying you need meme years for RP

just call it 1000BC and enjoy the general ancient theme

>>1980

What does a larger map add? Nothing

What does a larger map do? Spread people out, reduce the claims nations have over the land they should have, discourage travel etc etc etc

>>1981

>just call it 1000BC and enjoy the general ancient theme

enjoy lack of historical accuracy

enjoy nations which didn't exist in that exact time

enjoy nations which are mutually exclusive

enjoy "northmathr"

enjoy boston

enjoy "germania"

enjoy nation of "africa"

enjoy ATLANTIC FEDERATION

beef confirmed light fantasy shitter

>>1983

Poland

Britain

Helvetia

Aedui

Cimmeria

Egypt

Rome

Belgica

etc etc

Don't whine about muh historical accuracy, you're all shitters who couldn't give a single solitary fuck about RP

>>1981

> Spread people out, reduce the claims nations have over the land they should have, discourage travel etc etc etc

top cuck because in real life nations actually "claim" their land

most of countries' space irl is empty, borders are just a fucking agreement not real life controlled territority

>>1984

what is this post about faggot?

>>1985

And this is minecraft, not real life you autist

>>1986

1.0 you fucking bydlo

>>1987

and this is a historical RP minecraft server not your ancient themed light fantasy wet dreams

>>1988

yes and what that fucking post says? that I made a non historically accurate faction in 1.0? that would be false though, because I actually didn't make any faction in 1.0

you made with your disgusting british medieval kingdom when britain at the time was a bunch of unorganized tribes

>>1989

For a historical RP server you sure do absolutely fucking ZERO RP aside from naming your factions within some random arbritrary time period, and not acting anything like said faction did, not carrying their policies etc

literally only helvetia does that

>>1989

and the server was fun, bydlo

stop being so autistic and just have fun

needing le 100% accuracy in naming doesn't make shit fun

>>1990

>For a historical RP server you sure do absolutely fucking ZERO RP aside from naming your factions within some random arbritrary time period, and not acting anything like said faction did, not carrying their policies etc

are you referring to me? personally? because that would be an utter bullshit

also

>aside from naming your factions within some random arbritrary time period

oh but those are the basics of RP, literally basics, if you can't keep these simple basics your entire "RP" is fucking worthless

>and the server was fun, bydlo

take your nostalgia googles off

3.0 was fun too, 2.0 was fun too - and these are the only iterations I engaged into

>stop being so autistic and just have fun

>needing le 100% accuracy in naming doesn't make shit fun

I'm being autistic? Demanding BASIC accuracy regarding the most basic things related to a nation/town is an autism now? on historical RP server?

shoo shoo, light fantasy shitters

also the helvetian "rp"

i know you are in fucking love with your gay hugbox fuccboi friends but what is swiss doing relating to basically all of the time periods we went through is a fucking great example of NON RPing

don't want to get into it now, because this bullshit actually deserves a thread - how uneducated /int/craft players see helvetian shittery as "rp"

and another issue but really connected, while the current /int/craft elite(lets call it norse) doesn't even try to rp and to enforce it, the former elite(lets call it nobility) tried a lot to really make this server historically RP but the thing is, you are just utterly unintelligent people and you see RP only as a fucking hugbox celtic faires and other gay shit or literally set up wars

of two evils I'd rather have the former elite, you got it mostly wrong but atleast you tried and what is happening now is people calling to just fucking openly make it a medieval themed light fantasy server

it's fucking horrible what the current elite of intcraft is and what they did to this server, I warned everyone before Chien took over

wew

also the helvetian "rp"

i know you are in fucking love with your gay hugbox fuccboi friends but what is swiss doing relating to basically all of the time periods we went through is a fucking great example of NON RPing

don't want to get into it now, because this bullshit actually deserves a thread - how uneducated /int/craft players see helvetian shittery as "rp"

and another issue but really connected, while the current /int/craft elite(lets call it norse) doesn't even try to rp and to enforce it, the former elite(lets call it nobility) tried a lot to really make this server historically RP but the thing is, you are just utterly unintelligent people and you see RP only as a fucking hugbox celtic faires and other gay shit or literally set up wars

of two evils I'd rather have the former elite, you got it mostly wrong but atleast you tried and what is happening now is people calling to just fucking openly make it a medieval themed light fantasy server

it's fucking horrible what the current elite of intcraft is and what they did to this server, I warned everyone before Chien took over

>>1979

>beeftits:

>Larger maps have never really added anything and just spread people out more

>literally why do you want a larger map

>Huge bits of land shouldn't be easily claimed by one faction:

A decent city on a small map can take up an entire area the size of Siciliy, and renders the entire island uninhabitable for anyone else, as rival factions can't really set up two cities on a space like that, and thus, we cant recreate the historic retarded struggles of empires for tiny vital bits of land.

>As cobblelad pointed out, everything can easily become cramped:

A few cities, and the farms needed to support them, can swallow up an entire modern day cunt, making the serb and map seem like a pathetic attempt to represent entire nations with a few towns and villages. Instead of Iberia having a city and some villages, with tons of forests and hills around them; its now just 3 towns with their wheat farms, and the only "natural" land is the fences that separate the farms, and the 2-block-wide gravel footpaths between each city's farm.

>On a large map, city ruins are now fit to a small area of land, which is natural:

If a cities are razed or abandoned on a small condensed map, in a few weeks most of the map's landscape will be decorated in ugly griefed city ruins, which triggers many OCD autists like Dabe, who want beautiful landscapes and muh aesthetics and muh "natural city ruins" (direct quote).

>Geographical landmarks need to have natural proportions with the rest of the map:

We know that rivers and mountains have to be made to look significant, and out of proportion with the surrounding geography, so as not to make 1-block-wide streams or cliffs in 5x5 spots (if a direct scale is used to recreate landmarks). But on smaller maps, that makes an entire significant area taken by unusable geographical features, such as Iceland just being the site of three realistically-sized volcanoes, and a tiny loop of settle-able land around the coast.

>Distances between empires, on large maps, are now realistic:

This generates more fun exploration, and being a diplomat who's venturing from Scotland to Moscow can actually be a fun adventure now, to ride through Yurop, and take comfy screenshots and build small overnight camps, and meet some small one-man nations you've never heard of; and not just a boring 5 minute boat ride around scandinavia while you meme in global chat, as people do in small maps.

>Less fears of suddenly being attacked by everyone:

So, you can set up a comfy town in Japan, and know that you won't have someone from the norselands knocking on your gates and raping ur wimmen just because they covet lands that you own, and small faraway towns can feel much safer and grow into comfy peaceful places who aren't fucked over by wars; while the flipside is that the town is still experiencing the downside of being secluded and not having many people to trade with and not being able to easily take in refugees from far away areas to increase its population - creating very balanced gameplay.

>>1969

>why no earlier than 1000 ad lol ?

>>1977

>>AD

>kill self

>he wants a serb represented by mud huts and sandstone castles

>he wants to be banned for building with cobblestone, or making a large town anywhere other than the Mediterranean

>he wants cities which are just irrelevant shitholes and cuntrys, that new players (from advertising on 4ch and 8ch, as we should be doing) won't recognize or understand and won't play on the serb because of, or decide to break the rules and build more modern facs because they realize that's more fun, which makes the setting obsolete in the first place

>he doesn't realize that the most successful iterations and versions were either in a medieval setting, or had an ancient setting that everyone ignored and just pretended is a relaxed medieval setting

>>1996

no better you learn terms and your country history

historical RP =/= historical accuracy it's more like for a proper historical RP you need to be historically accurate in the first place… and naming your nation/town properly, locating it in accurate place, keeping the general architecture style it's what's needed in terms of historical accuracy

>>1997

if you don't like ancient history you don't need to and you simply shouldn't play on a server set in ancient times

>>1999

>you simply shouldn't play on a server set in ancient times

top kuk

just have that post appear on the screen of every new player who joins this serb

i'm sure that won't guarantee that every new player from /vg/ and 8ch etc, won't be discourage from playing, and we won't have a 10-player playerbase, filled with autistic history nerd spergs, who don't know how to play a fucking video game or have fun in it.

just autism up your serb, fam :/

>>2001

and why do you fucking imply there is not enough people playing minecraft and interested in ancient history? we already know that you are not interested but that's not the entire world…

>>2003

>people playing minecraft

hwat? are you literally targeting the average normie minecraft player?

we can't just advertise on leddit, you know, because that means the serb will attract normies, who will be disgusted by our 4chan origins, or our offensive memes, or our interest in lifeless losers who have the time to spend most of their days playing on this serb (and not a normie who joins, builds a 1-man town, gets bored, and leaves the serb forever).

>interested in ancient history

oh, so you want an autistic sperg who wants to hardcore rp and speak in ye olde english and never communicate with farmers for being low-class peasants and try to get people banned for saying "fam" as that wasn't a word back in the day?

because such a time period will only be liked by too small of a percentage of minecraft players, and who says they won't be like the normies and dislike us for being 4chainners.

what we need then, is a bunch of 4chainners who are interested in light rp and probably played minecraft before and like /pol/ and /int/ -tier autistic bants. 1.0 did really fucking well with just threads on /int/ and then /vg/. and we got a really likeable playerbase of memers and /int/ellectuals. the only issues were the /v/-tier Cimmerians, as they were actual normies or hardcore gamers or whatever - and not a bunch of people interested in autistic banter - and they really shat up the playerbase.

tl;dr:

>average minecraft players might be interested in the unusual time period, but hate us for being from 4chan

>autists who play minecraft AND are history nerds will want more autism and arr pee and historical accuracy, and less memes and bants

>hardcore gamers or minecraft nerds who actually play the game, neither arr pee, nor bother to make autistic bants and memes (see: Cimmeria).

the best targets would be casual history nerds and casual gamers, so we need a very casual and approachable and recognizable and famous historical time period - the medieval era.

>>2005

>labelling people with board/sites

oh fucking shit how narrow minded you can be

it doesn't fucking matter you are ledditor, brony, /int/, /vg/, /pol/, no one should fucking care about it

the thing that matters is is X person playing acording to the server rules?

also i never supported "targeting the average normie minecraft player" and i doubt I will

btw /int/ is a FUCKING CANCER board, go browse /his/, /int/ memester idiots are treated as subhuman shit parasite worms there and it's actually justified - so called "/int/ellectuals" have only memes in their heads

fuck this, look at this /int/ server, what average /int/ellectual is doing

and cimmeria actually rp'd more, had more "historically accurate" base than average /int/ faction

but you are probably one of the people who when attacked just sit and cry about "memeraiders" instead of getting gud, grinding exp and fighting back like it is supposed to be on historical RP server

>>2005

>nor bother to make autistic bants and memes

fuck off to /int/ meme cancer

>pepe

>spurdo

>sweden yes

funny as fuck lmao too bad im not 12 anymore

>>2010

> too bad im not 12 anymore

Aww, really? Happy birthday! ;^)

>>2011

poor response, but what to expect from fucking /int/ who wants other people to join his "memes and banters"

but yeah, if we are making anything in ancient era actually enforce it and don't allow people to build medieval settlements in northern europe kek

>>2008

>it doesn't fucking matter you are ledditor, brony, /int/, /vg/, /pol/, no one should fucking care about it

Kek, nice justification for advertising on sperg boards and sites. But these players are likely not autistic enough to like an ancient setting. That's why we need a broad audience (consisting of bronies and ledditors, yes, if need be), which is more easy to achieve with a smartly chosen setting of post-999 AD.

>the thing that matters is is X person playing acording to the server rules?

The thing that matters more, is "is X person playing on the serb, or has he quit because he got bored and disinterested with his sand castle?".

>also i never supported "targeting the average normie minecraft player" and i doubt I will

Hmm, must have confused you with Dabe, then (he wants an ancient setting as it's a different and unusual approach, and will attract normies who are sick of the millions of AD settings (he's still wrong to target normies instead of 4channers (who want to play on a medieval setting) though)). But by saying "not enough people playing minecraft and interested in ancient history", you imply that it's just an average Minecraft player who also likes ancient histroy, and not the average 4chan Minecraft-fan ancient history-fan. Because the latter is hard to find.

>btw /int/ is a FUCKING CANCER board, go browse /his/, /int/ memester idiots are treated as subhuman shit parasite worms there and it's actually justified - so called "/int/ellectuals" have only memes in their heads

Fine, advertise on /his/ instead of /int/, mr 4chan expert. But you're more likely to get autists instead of fun bantering lads.

>fuck this, look at this /int/ server, what average /int/ellectual is doing

Having fun, it seems. Instead of treating this as a job where you have to follow Nazi-tier laws about arr pee and historical accuracee.

>and cimmeria actually rp'd more, had more "historically accurate" base than average /int/ faction

>literally wanting more cimmerian players instead of /int/ellectuals or /vg/-ers

Why the fuck has no-one banned you yet? You're literal cancer to be honest my family.

>but you are probably one of the people who when attacked just sit and cry about "memeraiders" instead of getting gud, grinding exp and fighting back like it is supposed to be on historical RP server

So you literally want hardcore gamers? Hardcore historians and hardcore gamers, yes? Because that's so fucking cancerous and will kill our serb, either from people taking this shit too seriously and then quitting when they get raided because they wasted all of their time; or as just a fun sandbox serb for buildfags.

We need a balance, family. That attracts the most players and the most fun. And not autists and general spergery.

>>2010

>funny as fuck lmao too bad

>fun = bad

What the fuck?

>>2014

Nigga give me time to write these fucking essays out.

>>2015

Enforce rules and having them clearly laid out and not easily bendable (to avoid me being allowed to fucking build Iceni and its 50ft smooth stone walls just because I posted evidence that the Israelis had similar walls in the same century), yes, I agree with that.

>>1992

>swissfags

>neutral

>helvetia is neutral

this is rp

>>1994

>cucklefam always makes it seem as if he's done and going to quit /int/craft and qq

>he never actually does

Why must you tease me like this, God?

>>2017

>Kek, nice justification for advertising on sperg boards and sites

/int/ is literally a sperg board and 4chan is literally a sperg site

>>2017

>The thing that matters more, is "is X person playing on the serb, or has he quit because he got bored and disinterested with his sand castle?".

i wasn't even referring to the time period issue there

>Because the latter is hard to find.

not really but if your server is 6/100 and its really poorly managed no one will join anyway

>Fine, advertise on /his/

not going to do that, no point, it's /int/craft not /his/craft after all - based on ebin memes and banter and it's not an historical RP server

>Having fun, it seems. Instead of treating this as a job where you have to follow Nazi-tier laws about arr pee and historical accuracee

>Justifying lack of basic education and lack of basic knowledge

Nope, you play on historical RP server, you ought to make historically accurate town. And naming and locating it properly is surely not nazi… It's basics. And it's pretty much effortless.

>Why the fuck has no-one banned you yet? You're literal cancer to be honest my family.

>literally incapable of responding properly

but after all, what to expect from fucking ebin meme /int/ : ^ ))) XDDDD :DDDDD

So what's wrong about Cimmeria? Is being better than most of the playerbase in basically everything regarding this game(including RP and historical accuracy) means they are shitters and should be banned?

>>2019

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Switzerland

educate yourself, then talk

but what to expect from /int/ memesters, even fucking wikipedia articles are too much for them to comprehend

>>2022

>>cucklefam always makes it seem as if he's done and going to quit /int/craft and qq

I said I'm quitting this iteration and I did so, what's the problem?

not leaving the board, it's mine and I'm not going to let it to be next fucking nazi germany with pathetic censorship of everything the current administration disagrees with

>>2008

>people of certain mindsets and attitudes dont browse communities with similar mindsets and attitudes

eg you're cancer, you browse reddit

>>2026

>judge people by fucking INTERNET SITES they browse

>perceiving human beings as members of some internet "communities" instead of just seeing them as individual people even when these "communities" create basically no bond

also why do you still didn't start to educate yourself and you talk about things you have absolutely no knowledge about?

do you know what reddit is? it's not a unitary site at all even compared to 4chan with it's boards

btw 4chan has some good boards with no stupid memes too, surely /int/ isn't a part of them though, /int/ literally = /pol/

>>2017

he's been permabanned at least 3 times tbh

>>2027

>people have no personalities

>people with personalities dont tend to group together

coolghoul in charge of not being an autist

>>2024

>/int/ is literally a sperg board and 4chan is literally a sperg site

Was talking about leddit, as well as /mlp/ (but come to think about it, it was probably someone else who advertised for bronies, but I don't really care tbh).

>i wasn't even referring to the time period issue there

Then what? Have rules be treated as rules? Then I agree with you.

>not going to do that, no point, it's /int/craft not /his/craft after all - based on ebin memes and banter and it's not an historical RP server

But is it also "/reddit.com/r/intcraft/"craft? So is the playerbase not being autistic enough really the issue here? No fun allowed is the solution?

>And naming and locating it properly is surely not nazi… It's basics. And it's pretty much effortless.

I agree with that. I agree with basic historical accuracy with some Teshup-tier memes allowed. I don't agree with making the serb look as if we're targeting, or want, autism and hardcore arr pee, which is what an ancient setting will encourage.

>literally incapable of responding properly

Respond properly to you literally wanting more Cimmerian players? Literally what would be the correct response? "No, that's a silly thing to think, my friend"?

>So what's wrong about Cimmeria? Is being better than most of the playerbase in basically everything regarding this game(including RP and historical accuracy) means they are shitters and should be banned?

>hardcore gamers

>raided serb of casual gamers just to raep them

>not buildfags, just PVPers

>built a wooden fence as justification for playing on serb

>made everyone more autistic and involved in serb (and therefore more likely to quit when shit went wrong), by showing the benefits of Skype and so much organization

Tbh I was supportive of Cimmeria before Frebby raped them. I didn't like them, of course, but I felt that we shouldn't ban someone for being good, or not building enough castles. But then I realized that the server can't survive if we just let everyone do what they want, because most of the serb played on it (and played MC) casually and wasn't obsessed with it, and if we want them to carry on playing, we would need to create a safe space and something fun for the average /int/craft player (a memer who has time to waste on being autistic).

So, we shouldn't let hardcore gamers have an advantage over the rest of the playerbase by being better gamers than them. Which sucks, but if you want players like that, then enjoy your 0/72 players.

And no, they definitely weren't more RP or historically accurate. Their excuses that they were were so fucking thin, honestly surprised only you fell for them ;^)

>>2024

>I said I'm quitting this iteration and I did so, what's the problem?

Please tell me that means you're quitting every next iteration (because honestly who the fuck is still playing X.0, we're in the "RESET WHEN" stage with it by now).

Then we can make a new /intcraftXI/ board and permaban you from it and finally be happy :DDDDD.

>>2030

it was coolghoul who advertised on /mlp/ after being permad tbh

>>2028

>he's been permabanned at least 3 times tbh

>he is banned so that he can never be unbanned

>??

>he is banned again

Welp, there's our problem. :/

I think the "??" stage is the issue. Perhaps never unbanning him might fix it.

>>2032

Legit thought it was you :/

Sorry lad.

>>2034

>literally the biggest advocate for complete racial purity on intcraft

smh

>>2029

>>people with personalities dont tend to group together

people with *similar personalities

there is no "4chan" personality, there is no "/int/" personality, of course people grouping there have some common traits but thinking it's actually have any importance? lmao that's a definition of prejudice based on literally nothing

you are just one of people who would judge others by their race or fucking sites they browse, I don't think anything can cure such stupidity, pretty sad

also how is that possible I was browsing both leddit and int if they are so different and mutually exclusive… ?

>>2028

>>2032

>>2033

was perma banned once and oh sorry I don't fuck dave in the ass so I don't get permabanned for offense which clearly justifies a permaban

>>2036

but there is an /int/ personality you fucking mong

memes are literally proof of this

>permabanned once

was permad by dave

was permad by dave

was permad by me

was permad by conf

was permad by red

was permad by me

>>2030

>Was talking about leddit

how the fuck reddit is a sperging site? on all of the main subreddits your sperging will be downvoted to hell

oh maybe /r/4chan is pretty spergy idk I dont browse it

/int/ is a sperging board, /pol/ is a sperging board, /mlp/ I have absolutely no idea because I don't spend my time there and never was

>But is it also "/reddit.com/r/intcraft/"craft?

??

>which is what an ancient setting will encourage.

fucking bullshit no setting itself encourages a "hardcore rp"

if you missed your first history lessons and you don't know about things like Rome, Greece, Athens, Han, Babylon, Alexandria, Persia then you are an idiot and there is no justification for that

>>not buildfags, just PVPers

they had full built RP base with more or less accurate houses, wall, actually fucking place of the religious cult … dunno if any screenshots survived but if anyone has a ss of cimmeria base post it because this guy clearly has no idea what he is talking about

>Tbh I was supportive of Cimmeria before Frebby raped them. I didn't like them, of course, but I felt that we shouldn't ban someone for being good, or not building enough castles. But then I realized that the server can't survive if we just let everyone do what they want, because most of the serb played on it (and played MC) casually and wasn't obsessed with it, and if we want them to carry on playing, we would need to create a safe space and something fun for the average /int/craft player (a memer who has time to waste on being autistic).

So, we shouldn't let hardcore gamers have an advantage over the rest of the playerbase by being better gamers than them. Which sucks, but if you want players like that, then enjoy your 0/72 players.

And no, they definitely weren't more RP or historically accurate. Their excuses that they were were so fucking thin, honestly surprised only you fell for them ;^)

>this whole fucking section

I dont even know where to start …

>Cimmeria

>not RP

in terms of name and location they were 100% RP, Cimmerians literally existed 1000 BC and we have written sources

but probably they weren't "slavic" and cheshire just went with them as they were just a Slavic tribes because no one really fucking knows anyway, imo RP wise it wasn't really any kind of major bullshit

also if you don't like the fact someone dominates /int/craft why aren't you asking for norse being somehow purged? cimmerians yeah, they rekt a lot of factions but their domination was based solely on their militarily superiority, they never built any empire, they never built a network of alliances, on the other side norse dominate server completely and utterly

>>2037

>but there is an /int/ personality you fucking mong

>memes are literally proof of this

top kek most of memes you spam don't even originate from /int/

and what is this /int/ personality? can you describe it? what is /pol/ personality then? what is /brit/ personality then? what is 8ch intcraftx personality? Kek. Just stop with this total bullshit, you aren't convincing anyone actually INTELLIGENT.

>was permad by dave

>was permad by dave

and why the fuck you repeat that 2 times? yes banned by him for kill aura

so you were but I don't fuck him into the ass so my ban was longer

>was permad by conf

??

>was permad by red

red was a fucking clown he banned me because I insulted him on the skype

>was permad by me

literally irrelevant, fag +completely unjustified

>>2038

>calling yourself intelligent

>>2039

well

more intelligent than you, that's for sure

>>2041

>literally complains about how retarded he is on reddit

>>2042

prove how that does make me even potentially unintelligent

oh wait, no, I guess it's too much for you, getting into more serious discussion based on substantial evidences I think I will need to think about some meme response XDDDXDXD XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

I've only read the posts completely up to half the thread, then I skimmed a bit

From what I've seen, here is my thought:

I agree wholeheartedly with all Spandy said. Except the time period. Ancient times is better for bants and shit

>>2038

>>Was talking about leddit

>how the fuck reddit is a sperging site? on all of the main subreddits your sperging will be downvoted to hell

>oh maybe /r/4chan is pretty spergy idk I dont browse it

>/int/ is a sperging board, /pol/ is a sperging board, /mlp/ I have absolutely no idea because I don't spend my time there and never was

Jesus fucking Christ how does this decide the damn time period setting and how many players it will get. I really don't care about your leddit knowledge.

>>2038

>??

Don't make /int/craft subreddits pls fam.

>fucking bullshit no setting itself encourages a "hardcore rp"

if you missed your first history lessons and you don't know about things like Rome, Greece, Athens, Han, Babylon, Alexandria, Persia then you are an idiot and there is no justification for that

>He wants to arr pee as a shitskin living in a mudhut who flings sand at his sandal-wearing enemies.

Doesn't sound fun except to people who are really into history, and therefore into acting out history in video games, and therefore engaging in arr pee.

>they had full built RP base with more or less accurate houses, wall, actually fucking place of the religious cult … dunno if any screenshots survived but if anyone has a ss of cimmeria base post it because this guy clearly has no idea what he is talking about

Yes, the 2-block high wooden planks around the perimeter of the area as a wall. And huts. And then they started to PvP, and got mad and say they were definitely arr peeing with their shitty little huts. And frebby didn't fall for it so he fucked them over. But you fell for it so good job.

>I dont even know where to start …

LOL U KNO MY ARGUMENT TOO GOOD

NICE FAKING RESPONSE U LOSAR

KEK I WON THE ARGUMENT :DDDD

WINNAR BY FOURFEET

SUK MY PIXIE DICK

GG NO RE

Srsly tho we need some rules that pretty much imply to peopple some basic historical accuracy is needed; but we shouldn't aim for the hardcore arr pee crowd.

>>2047

>implying intcraft was ever meant to be for /pol/

>>2045

>dabe

>literally agreeing with me

Y E S

E

S

>Except the time period

hwat? fam, that was the whole point of my argument D:

We can't have bants in ancient times unless we relax the ancient times arr pee. But that will just push people to ignore the setting and start building cobblestone castles.

>>2050

Setting in ancient times means people will be less keen on being anal with accurate RP, because less is generaly known, both by experts and the general crowd

>>2051

and let me just be honest, AD times are so boring. It's all lelele DEUS VULT xddddd

in 1000 BC I could literally make shit up and call it RP and it would probably have been somewhat correct

>>2051

Just call it 1000bc and let people build "general old" theme

>>2053

>Just call it 1000bc and let people build "general old" theme

i can't imagine anything less rp tbh. Isn't that what you told us to do when you were madmin? Howd that turn out?

>>2045

i agree with spandy but he is unnecessary shitting on ancient >>2048

history is redundant

>Jesus fucking Christ how does this decide the damn time period setting and how many players it will get. I really don't care about your leddit knowledge.

you understand that not every sentence posted here directly refers to choosing the time period? lmao

>>2048

>Don't make /int/craft subreddits pls fam.

i don't make any intcraft subreddits

I made this one in 1.0 because it was funny how /int/ sperg cucks sperged over reddit with no reason

>>2048

>>He wants to arr pee as a shitskin

after this very intelligent words I should just ignore all you said, but I'll just ignore this sentence

or no, I will actually respond but I'm afraid it's pointless considering your clear lack of basic knowledge

yes there are people who want to RP ancient times because … they are interesting for them maybe? so hard to understand someone has different preferences? so hard to understand someone is into literal foundation stones of our human civilization?

>>2048

>Doesn't sound fun except to people who are really into history

all of people here should really be into history and geography that's why we had "spawn is in sinai if you don't know where it's not a right server for you" notation on the spawn some iterations ago

>>2048

>Yes, the 2-block high wooden planks around the perimeter of the area as a wall. And huts.

It was more like 7-8 blocks tall

>And then they started to PvP, and got mad and say they were definitely arr peeing with their shitty little huts.btw

Oh and how exactly they DID NOT RP'd? They did literally what they were supposed to do - Cimmerians had little shit huts, Cimmerians had shitty wooden wall(not some fucking medieval wall like "britons") and they were pretty agressive people

so what did 1.0 Cimmerians did wrong regarding RP? instead of going full slavic(but as I said we have no idea what Cimmerian culture really was)

>LOL U KNO MY ARGUMENT TOO GOOD

NICE FAKING RESPONSE U LOSAR

KEK I WON THE ARGUMENT :DDDD

WINNAR BY FOURFEET

SUK MY PIXIE DICK

GG NO RE

just that whole section was filled with so much fucking bullshit it overwhelmed me for a little while

>>2049

>implying /int/=/=/pol/

top kek yeah, "racial purity" defender with your >>2050

red pill mindset

>We can't have bants in ancient times unless we relax the ancient times arr pee.

how the fuck exactly "you can't have bants" in ancient setting and you suddenly can have it in a medieval setting? what's the difference here?

>>2054

this faggot since 1.0 was trying to enforce himself as ebin pro RP

when in reality he is fucking ancient fantasy shill

>>2047

>rp

>the way /int/craft was meant to be played

>join serb

>"hi lads"

>60 minute ban

>"Reason: Inappropriate language for the current time period."

>wait the hour

>rejoin

>"Hello, my good friends!"

>guy comes up to me

>skin is of a bearded negro dressed in a white blanket

>he says " ?"

>realize I spawned near Egypt, no-one will be speaking British here

>sail to Britain

>see a guy farming

>"Hello, do you know where the capital is?"

>he freezes, drops me some gold nuggets, all of his food, and says "Pleased to meet you, my lord".

>realize my skin is of some random king

>give him 5 hits with a stick and tell him to never talk to me again

>he thanks me and I leave

>Fucking peasants swear to god.

>build a hut

>get raided by a bunch of barbarians a few days later

>die

>permabanned

>tfw no respawning in roleplaying

>>2052

that tbh

plus more interesting religions in ancient era

>>2056

>literal foundation stones of human civilisation

except from poland who were civilised by the germans and russians and have done literally nothing of note since

>>2057

>fallacy: the post

>>2062

>autism: the pole

>>2060

why are you referring to poland out of the blue

I never said of Poland as of "foundation stone" of anything

>except from poland who were civilised by the germans

true

>and russians

bullshit, russians didn't even exist back then

>>2066

>russians not existing in 1939

>>2052

But that's the issue, people will stop caring about the rules and do whatever they want and that's how we get Briton's 100 ft high stone memewalls. Which is the same as having a medieval setting (which allows stone memewalls) in the first place.

>>2057

we want to enforce historical RP regarding to nations names, locations, general "architectural" style(no skyscrapers in antiquity), stop assuming we want any "hardcore RP"

>>2070

nuffin wrong with britons tbh

we still did the rp that mattered, diplomacy, culture etc

>>2068

Poland was "civilised" in 10th century

>>2073

poland still isn't civilised in the 21st century fam

>>2069

what kind of retard made this mud hut in China

maybe read up about Zhou Dynasty

and what kind of retard went with this roman fantasy architecture in 1000 bc?

>>2074

oh shit yeah, that's an "/int/ discussion" i forgot

from now on I will just proceed to ignore you

>>2077

see

you're literally incapable of handling the banter

you aren't welcome here

if you dont like /int/, fuck off from intcraft

>>2075

>Tbf, saying "Israel had stone walls" is enough that you should be able to build stone walls everywhere. As long as there's proof that someone managed to create glass, then every cunt should be allowed to use glass in its structures.

and what kind of logic is that, no not everyone could build stone walls and didn't, some areas were less/differently developed than the other ones

>>2080

no one likes banter like this except for the br*ts

and I'm not fucking underage, I don't find pleasure in throwing meaningless shit at the other people

Also, ancient celtic cultures still had walls

look at the ones we built in celtiberia for example, earthern ramparts with stone/wood facades

Also, ancient celtic cultures still had walls

look at the ones we built in celtiberia for example, earthern ramparts with stone/wood facades

>>2083

>my country is shit and i'm insecure

>waaaaaaaah abloobloo

fuck off

>>2085

>for some reason always has to "banter" and "meme"

fuck off to /int/ or /pol/, parasite

>>2086

>WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH ABLOOBLOO

>>2056

>you understand that not every sentence posted here directly refers to choosing the time period? lmao

We're having a civilized debate here, fam. ;^)

That means we should focus on the matter at hand. ;^)

>I made this one in 1.0 because it was funny how /int/ sperg cucks sperged over reddit with no reason

Because it will attract shitters who will ruin the playerbase. Seems like a justified response tbh.

>yes there are people who want to RP ancient times because

Not enough of them tho. That's the problem. You can't build a Minecraft Ancient history 4chan Server. Can try to build a Minecraft Medieval history 4chan Server, though.

>all of people here should really be into history and geography

Good luck finding them.

Literally the most players we had was when we were advertising on /vg/ and /int/. Not really ancient history nerds (to the extend they can successfully RP it), now are they?

>It was more like 7-8 blocks tall

Good point. Still, just some lazy bits of wood, and very likely to have been just for fortifications and help PvP.

>Oh and how exactly they DID NOT RP'd?

>be armenian shitskin

>decide to build a nation

>put some planks around an island

>build a hut

>"WELP LADS THATS OUR NATION FINISHED. LET'S GO TAKE OVER BRITAIN NOW :DDD:d;DDD:d:DD"

>just that whole section was filled with so much fucking bullshit it overwhelmed me for a little while

I was memeing, you dip!

>>2092

>dirt village with 3 block high wall

>cobbletower

It's like you want the server to become Cobbleghouls wet fantasy

>>2099

>generic medieval villages all looking the same

small and cozy is better than big and majestic imo tbqhwyf but I understand if you don't dig it

So lads, is the best time period for 11.0 that we should advertise "1000 BC to 1000 AD"? Or "1000 BC but very relaxed historical accuracy?" Those are literally worse than a hardcore 1000 bc setting.

>>2107

>Early middle ages towns weren't small and cozy

They were tbcfhwy and they managed to be cozy while still being safe and easily accessable from a gameplay perspective

>>2089

>Because it will attract shitters who will ruin the playerbase.

god dammit this subreddit doesn't attract anything no one ever visits it no one ever posts there

it's literally for memes

also Idk how it even potentially would attract "shitters"

>>2089

>Not enough of them tho.

here we are 3 people who enjoy ancient history and we can play intcraft in ancient setting and oyu are the only one defending the thesis that medieval is the only one right period …

bad thing 1 of these ancient defenders thinks helvetia 1000 BC is RP…

>>2089

>Good point. Still, just some lazy bits of wood, and very likely to have been just for fortifications and help PvP.

and that's what real life low developed ancient cultures was about

they literally build lazy wooden shit just to have some basic fortification

>be armenian shitskin

>decide to build a nation

>put some planks around an island

>build a hut

>"WELP LADS THATS OUR NATION FINISHED. LET'S GO TAKE OVER BRITAIN NOW :DDD:d;DDD:d:DD"

bullshit their base was large, they had a lot of huts also as I said they had a place of religious cult

how can it get more RP? as I said we have basically no information on cimmerians

or you just don't like some people want to pvp? like real cimmerians would do?

>>2114

go with 800 AD

>>2125

>god dammit this subreddit

Got lucky, then. Chances are ledditors would have just been hardcore autists; or normies who join the serb, build a 1-man town, get offended by a racist meme in the chat, and leave forever.

So don't advertise there.

>the thesis that medieval is the only one right period

A thesis backed by facts ;^)

The most successful and popular iterations had a medieval setting. The only popular ancient ones just had relaxed rules that essentially allowed medievalness.

It's just the way it is, medieval is the best. I'm just only explaining why that is, at this point.

>bullshit their base was large, they had a lot of huts also as I said they had a place of religious cult

>implying

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMlssUrFcjs8SQg5ezV5P6A/videos

>how can it get more RP?

If the nation was actually doing well before it started random fucking Crusades against people on the other side of the continent.

>>2129

>get offended by a racist meme in the chat, and leave forever.

?? nice meme

>>2129

>The most successful and popular iterations had a medieval setting.

3.0 was succesful

1.0 was succesful

and probably the most succesful periods in these iterations were actually 100% ancient

>>2133

also 4.0 was very succesful until beef's stupid admin dramas

and what medieval iterations were actually succesful? X? and what else? dead 2.0? dead 5.0?

>>2133

>3.0

>1.0

>not medieval

come on mate everyone played them as if they were medieval. Every faction had 20 block tall memewalls. You literally can't count 1.0 and 3.0 as ancient.

>>2133

>>2135

1.0

>ancient start

>unpopular

>started to grow

>people started to be medieval

>by april 1, its peak, it was half medieval

>fell apart due to unclear rules (such as time period, and whether it was medieval or ancient)

2.0

>classical

>unpopular

>fell apart literally due to unpopularity

3.0

>medieval/classical

>popular

4.0

>popular

>did fantastic

>fell apart because red is cancer

5.0-10.0

>haven't played them.

>>2139

bullshit ancient 1.0 wasn't unpopular

oldfags refer to it as the best 1.0 later on people literally started to not RP

>>fell apart due to unclear rules (such as time period, and whether it was medieval or ancient)

it fell apart due to numerous factors don't simplify it like this

>2.0

>>classical

>550 ad

>classical

???

550 ad is already medieval

>>medieval/classical

how the fuck 300 BC is medieval/classical, you can barely say it about 550 AD but 500 BC is pretty deep antiquity

and the first happenings and dominant factions were carthage and rome with punic war as a first conflict of the iteration

it was completely ancient, except for the shitters who shit on every iteration and don't care about rp(norse, japs)

>>fell apart because red is cancer

? how exactly he was a cancer? I admit his stupid bounties and so on were a fucking bullshit also I dont like "pvp events" but he was some pretty nice, strong and fucking consistent admin

beef rek'd the server with his le ebin coups

wew

>>2139

>3.0

>300BC

>Medieval/Classical

>>2148

Meant to be treated as classical, everyone treated it as medieval.

>>2153

I think literally only the norse did that in 3.0 tbh

Epirus, Rome, Carthage and Celtiberia were all in period

>>2153

*shitters treated it as medieval

why did you even play that iteration if you don't like antiquity…

>>2191

>why did you even play that iteration

I played as Iceland, which was just a bunch of wooden cabins through out most of the world's history.

Then I got invited to play as Carfage, which was old and boring throughout its history. And the only "play"ing that I did there was building a stone floating memestatue.

We also raided Epicruse but they seemed to be Ancient Greece-tier.

And Rome was fairly medieval (if not edging on Renaissance) tier.

i remember in the factions plugin that if players were inactive they would begin to lose power down to -10. I thought this was a clever way to prevent towns from hoarding inactive players for claims. Do you think there is a way to adapt this for towny?

>>2224

>Carthage

>old and boring throughout its history

what the fuck…

>Carthage history

>boring

wew literally Carthage pulled off one of the best wars in the history of warfare - 2nd Punic War

Did you play 3.0 Carthage wew? I don't remember ya. : ^ )

>>2318

boring as in its just a fucking sandcastle, and it falls before the world starts building with cobblestone.

so its just an old and boring sandcastle throughout its history.

>Did you play 3.0 Carthage wew? I don't remember ya. : ^ )

Funny how you don't remember me, yet I remember you going on Skype and bitching at me, and accusing everyone of hacking and Dabe of cheating, after you warlogged to go to sleep (for 3 hours) and found that your city was razed.

;^)

People generally approved of medieval/colonial periods based on the number of players we've had in the recent iterations.

>>2238

That's what i asked Factions staff few days ago

https://github.com/MassiveCraft/Factions/issues/795#issuecomment-159150715

Actually, it is pretty easy to implement and I can actually might do it myself

As for Towny? No, we'd need to write power system ourselves with events etc. Absolutely not worth the effort

>>3021

factions in overall are much better plug-in but what about the invasiona

>>3021

frankly if we end up setting 11s time period as 1000 bc i think factions would be acceptable. In these times most of the world was just tribes or city states. I'd be intresting to see people work out vassalship of smaller factions paying homage to larger factions for protection. Forming their own nations through a system of trust and tribute.

>>3055

at last they truly see

this is how it was in 1.0

>>3029

just punish factions if they turtle tbh

sieges still annoy factions, and in 1.0/2.0, most defenders sallied forth to fight the attackers

>>3029

>>3069

i'd be intresting to have ways for conventional walls to ake memeraiders piss off but still be breachable by dedicated invaders. Maybe a recipe that could make fire spreading flint and steel that could burn down houses to root out ppl hiding? Or like a tnt catapult that could be used to fling "stones" (tnt) into walls to destroy them.

>>3069

>just punish factions if they turtle

>>3055

> I'd be intresting to see people work out vassalship of smaller factions paying homage to larger factions for protection

That legit happened to me in 1.0.

I made a shitty nordic tribe city-state thing, and Sapmi came and forced vassalage upon me. Fucking sapmi

>>3303

Noordland?

>>3320

yep.

>>1981

larger map means more choice for what you want to be ie, looks like i wont get to be aztec next reset

People who want a larger map argue that a town or kingdom can easilly take up too m7ch space and make realistic conflicts impossible.

I think the fix to this problem is making a totally different scale on the map. If we use the crop in the thumb of this post we could still have a large map. And it would make it possible to have many kingdoms within scotland for example.

It would be much more rp to march across the map, from ireland to denmark and have a realistic war rather than marching from norway to africa.

>>1923

Alt Clut was Brythonic, closer to Welsh than Irish. Gaels in Scotland at that time were under the Kingdom of Dalriada.