/international/ - International Discussion

Ān Lùshān rebellion

>the last census undertaken before the rebellion, in 755, recording a population of 52,919,309 in 8,914,709 taxpaying households. However, a census taken in 764, the year following the end of the rebellion, recorded only 16,900,000 in 2,900,000 households.

the one where the europeans killed the vast majority of the original inhabitants of the geographical region(s) known as north and south america

>>192

Would plagues be considered a genocide though? I know the diseases were brought there by Europeans, but you could say the Black Plague was a genocide of Europeans by Mongols with the same reasoning.

>>195

But we do consider Jews that large part died due to typhoid as being genocided.

>>197

I suppose we should go be the definition in op's pic then

the murder of 6 million G-d's chosen of course.

>>197

Yeah, but that's because they were denied health care. If they weren't, many of them wouldn't have died of typhoid fever even if they got it.

>>241

Did Europeans provide health care to the natives?

If no, then by your logic, it was a genocide.

>>195

>>245

of course the europeans provided healthcare to the natives. the natives of north america got blankets full of small pox.

because thats so considerate.

>>251

I think that was only one isolated incident. From what I understand, most natives had already been hit pretty hard by smallpox just from contact.

>>191

AnLushan rebellion wasnt a genocide, just a civil war.

The genocide of the Zhungar by the Manchus was a pretty succesful genocide, with a low casualty number but it effectively wiped out the zhungar population.