/jim/ - My personal image blog

Oh, here is a link to the video.

>they dont have many helmet children anymore

I laughed so hard at this bit

>>1525

Nice!

I doubt it will stop /intl/ goons. They just want to harm the site and don't really care about any issues they complain about. It's all an excuse to manure this place up.

Maybe you could tell Hotwheels to put the link to the video on top, like any other announcement, so everybody can see it. Few anons even know about 8chan's youtube channel.

Saw the video on youtube. Thanks HW & Jim

This was a pretty nice video with a few funny parts that may end up as webm here.

The only issue that remains is

ehether music uploads stay or not. I could hack down a autistic treatise about post scarcity and how it has effectively killed the music industry. It wouldn't make the license holders not filing DMCAs and demands for royalities like crazy though.

>>1533

Does that mean you will finally leave your room, get a job and then a wife?

>>1536

How does not knowing how the most affected boards acted when some knucklehead wrote about making advertizing threads make you feel !?

>>1545

Telling people that Hiro is a massive yogigot is advertising now? No. Most of them are newfriends who don't even remember the /poverty/ manure from when it happened. I know I had a few threads on it on /g/ and /a/ back when. Your posts are just reinforcing the fact that their stockholm syndrome is hilariously delusional.

>>1548

No one cares, dude. If they want to advertise in futility to a userbase that is experiencing stockholm syndrome for a person who is known for manureting up his last project, so be it.

You're insanely delusional as well, thinking you're an epic trole, and I'm just stimulating your autism by replying to you, so I'll stop.

>>1548

Than study off back to cuckchan and complain that we have CP whilst also complaining that we are heavily moderated.

I'm tired this double standard bullmanure, and no one here cares about muh pr and muh reputation either.

>>1553

https://8ch.net/who re.txt

I forgot that Jim censors a lot of words here.

>>1552

Sounds like he's asserting that he had manure in his racks paid for by the government 10+ years ago and that it's all Tier 1 now. Bit different from what you're asserting.

>>1560

>>1552

he's talking about the 2ch stuff which he's already talked about in depth on 2ch. if you're not familiar with what he's talking about you can go read codemonkey (latermuse) talk about removing the software that Conman used to send post data to his marketing company connections. also >>>/newspaper/

I'd chuck my wang in her tbh

Are there actually cuckchan shills browsing Jim right now?

Its okay guys, we understand you're frustrated that your moderator for /a/ is a brony Gaiayogi, we all feel bad for you.

>>1575

Actually, Reddit bans subreddits that are non-grata for its image. See: /r/jailbait, /r/coontown, /r/fatpeoplehate

>>1577

Sa-geh isn't whatever you think it is, either. You should use it when you make posts that aren't pertinent to the broader topic being discussed.

>>1579

8chan isn't 8chan /a/ or 8chan /pol/.

Honestly, what are you even arguing? That all boards should allow every post? Every board would just be /b/. cuckchan doesn't allow that either, so what's your case?

>>1582

You aren't going to get totally 'free speech' anywhere on the Internet. What is it you want to post on /a/, /v/, /pol/ or /tech/ that they won't allow? Can you post it on cuckchan?

>>1584

You're acting braindead. Dividing topics of discussion up into boards so that every board isn't just an unintelligible /b/ mess isn't 'suppression' or 'censorship', it's an utterly standard and good way to organize discussions.

>8chan has a lack of free speech

That's funny coming from a cuckchan shill.

>>1587

Yeah dude, they should just ask nicely instead.

>>1586

>Anyone who disagrees with me is a SHILL from 4CHA.N (censored here lol)

This is why 8gag gets laughed at on other sites

This thread is pretty sad.

>>1589

You are visibly from cuckchan. Everyone can tell from your mannerisms, even without taking into account your /intl/-like zealotish retard opinion.

>>1589

Oh, so you are from >>>/int/ even worse

>>1593

>I don't use 4cha.n (censored here lol).

Oh thanks dude, I didn't believe you the first time you said this but you've convinced me. There's no way someone would lie about this.

>>1594

>>1591

launching into ad-homs just makes you look wrong amigo :), deflection wont work.

>>1596

No it just an ass blasted >>>/int/ yogi who probably banned from other boards for an attempted raid.

>>1595

I'm sure cuckchan values freespeech they should be more to your liking, no?

You can't possibly be this mad over wordfilters.

2006 /b/ must've given you an ulcer or something.

http://8ch.net/ints/res/12688.html

http://8ch.net/ints/res/12626.html

(￣ー￣)

>>1597

It's >>>/ints/. Jim's problem would be solved if he just gives them a 3 month ban until they stop, because they ran out of proxies. Then interested people can collect their whining.

>>1606

wena nido

>>1584

>>1587

>>1593

>>1595

>>1599

Your useless accusation that 8chan doesn't support free speech quickly falls apart when its applied to other entities. One wouldn't say that the usa

doesn't support free speech, since private entities can remove you from their property if you say things they don't like.

That's essentially what most of you people that use that useless argument seem to forget. boards on 8chan are treated as the property of the individual that

created them. Its not an indictment on 8chan as a platform that /jim/ has a word-filter for 4cha.n, it simply means that jim can run his PERSONAL image blog

how ever he pleases, the same would be true if he chose to actively ban you for these posts here: >>1595 , >>1593 , >>1589 or just because you said something

he didn't like.

So many of you conveniently forget that a board like /ints/ can freely exist on 8chan without any sort of admin intervention. That's primarily because 8chan is a free speech

platform that allows boards with an objective standard of free speech like /ints/ to exist alongside boards with very heavy moderation like /pol/.

>>1609

>One wouldn't say that the usa doesn't support free speech, since private entities can remove you from their property if you say things they don't like.

Can they kick you out of a public area? I think the top legacy boards shouldn't be considered private property.

>>1610

>It doesn't.

yes it does, its why someone can scream "you deserve to be raped" in a public area.

>The rest of your wall of text I didn't read.

So no argument then? Thanks for saving me the time.

>>1619

→ http://www.nido.org/b/

>>1613

>I think the top legacy boards shouldn't be considered private property.

Why not? they're just names. Its not my fault more people would rather use a board with the name /v/ rather than /vvv/

>>1618

The board owners of those boards being global volunteers doesn't mean anything. them having global permissions has no relation to how

they run THEIR board. And if they decide to use one those "censorship" tools, then you're free to use other boards that don't.

>>1621

>Why not? they're just names. Its not my fault more people would rather use a board with the name /v/ rather than /vvv/

oh no you studying don't

you studying don't you piece of manure

you're totally pretending you don't know what I'm talking about but you actually totally know what I'm talking about

god

studying

DAMMIT

>>1616

Well i know this may be devastating to you, but you don't get to distribute content of children being raped.

>Similarly, 8chan does not support free speech.

8chan supports free speech in according to u.s. law

>>1622

Calm down, fam.

>>1625

/ints/ should take the heh pill.

They should learn how to take it easy.

>>1610

>>1611

>>1612

Complete freedom is impossible. My freedom to kill you conflicts with your freedom to live. Your freedom to silence me conflicts with my freedom to speak.

In an ideal world, 8chan would have an infinite capacity and no threads would ever die, meaning it would be impossible to slide a board out of existence. Also, it would be easy to find threads that interest you (like with a filter in addition to the catalog search). But that's not the way it is. The boards can only hold so many threads at once. In this sense, freedom of expression on any given board has a hard limit and as far as the top-level of threads go, speech is a zero-sum game.

You claim to care about freedom of speech, but you're actively hogging a huge portion of the space here by manureposting. Since we can't have absolute free speech, we have to settle for something else. The second best thing we can do is asymptotically increase the amount of free speech toward the limit. Within the existing restrictions, a mathematically ideal board would be filled with threads that accrue posts and viewers equally, until they hit the post limit, and only then would new threads would appear. That's not ideal for a thriving community; I'm just providing it as a point of contrast to what has been happening. Instead of approaching that, we're almost at the opposite extreme right now. We can't have complete freedom, so if you care about it you should try for the next best thing: more than we currently have.

Aha! That's exactly what you're after is it not? You're trying to make a statement. You're sacrificing some freedom now for more freedom later. But here's the problem with that. According to your own valuation of freedom, your actions only become justified if your opponents cave in to you, otherwise all you accomplished was to restrict freedom of speech. Your victory is not guaranteed. In fact it's so unlikely that you might as well write off the possibility entirely. Probabilistically the expected result here is no change in moderation, while you have wasted however much time people could have used to discuss the board topic. What you are doing is at complete odds with your stated goals.

But hold on, it gets even worse than this. This is infinitechan. The site's gimmick is your ability to create your own boards. If you are displeased with how a board pursues free speech (or doesn't), you are free to make your own board. You are free to speak there instead. You are free to shill that board on the other boards. You are free to put your ideas into action and make a better board. You are free to force a board's hand by providing stiff competition in the marketplace of marketplaces of ideas. You can protest board moderation (and even create pressure for change) without infringing on anybody's ability to speak whatsoever. You can do all of this purely via creative action.

But you don't. With the unfettered ability to create at your fingertips, you instead destroy. Because deep down you fear that you don't have it in you to create anything, and you're jealous of the people who are unafraid. All you do is tear down other people. You invade existing spaces to shut down discussions because it's the only way you feel you can affect anything. But you're wrong. We all have the ability to create. You certainly have the energy. If you really are all bleeding heart about free speech, go create your own boards for whatever you want. It doesn't matter if they're manurety. They'll be yours. And if they're manurety, just keep posting content, and post better content than before.

If you don't actually give a damn about free speech, drop the pretense. Nobody is buying it, except whatever people you've fooled into thinking it's a wise use of their time to help you. All you're actually doing is disrupting the site. Own your manure. Maybe someday you'll actually be good at studying with people. Maybe try for something specific, like /sp/ and gets. Right now you're a tiresome annoyance that goes away very quickly.

>>1630

Wall of text = redditor

>>1631

>having ADHD

>>1632

>X speech isn't free speech!

Lmfao

No use writing a wall of text like a redditor when you could have summed it up in one sentence.

I don't know what the bloody hell is happening in this thread but it looks entertaining.

>>1631

>>1633

>>1634

>>1637

>>1638

>>1640

>not recognizing stale copypasta

who's the redditor again?

>>1643

In Minecraft everything is built out of cubes.

That is why I said that, but what is the root of

the word kubo?

Also isn't that a nipa roof on a bahay kubo that is a nipa hut?

That is a nice nipa hut by the way.

>>1643

https://translate.google.com/#tl/en/kubo

It does mean cube according to Google.

>>1529

Thank you for the invite. I checked out your board. I can't stop laughing. What a great board.

//pinoy

>>1645

It seems that the >>>/ints/ yogigots have already found a way to manure up this place.

>>1635

Me too, the thread sort of got out of control.

>>1645

You know how "rain" and "bow" creates "rainbow?"

Or, if you prefer, "bahag (cloth worm to cover the genitals, think of someone from a tribe)" and "hari (king)," becomes "bahaghari (rainbow)."

That's what happens here.

Bahay - house

Kubo - (This doesn't really have a meaning, as far as I know. Kubo meaning cube only happened recently thanks to English terms beibg appropriated)

Bahay-kubo: Nipa hut (this use has been around for far longer than "house cube")

I'm the same guy who corrected you oh the usage of "po," by the way.

>>1644

That's sort of how nipa huts got their names.

>>1650

Thanks for the class. I really enjoy the Philippines.

>>1653

Thank you for your time.

Unless you really want to learn the ins and outs of the more archaic words in the language, Filipino is actually fairly easy to learn.

Taglish, of course, is even easier for native English speakers, though it feels wrong to simply code-switch between the two languages in a single statement.

>>1655

>>1656

>>1657

literal autism

>>1655

>>1656

>>1657

literal autism

>>1655

>>1656

>>1657

Thank you for

sperging out

p

e

r

g

i

n

g

o

u

t

Jim is lame and dishonest.

>>1662

no u

Jim, dude, just ban these goons. They say nothing of value and just repeating the same tinfoil manure over and over. They have all the other boards for their "free speech" (manureposting), let them study off there.

>>1662

He felt way more genuine than Conman, that's for sure.

>>1536

>mfw aspie keeps parroting

>>1529

No autism plz

>>1526

As a helmet child I take offense to this

>>1669

>my job

I had no idea that being asshurt, whining about '8gaggers,' whining about rules of conduct surrounding any community, flooding what has historically been a self-moderating board, and sitting in IRC circlejerking all day while complaining about about IRC circlejerking, and many more signs of autism could be a primary form of employment.

Everyone wishes they could be as successful as you, average /ints/ user.

>>1679

Hehee, you made me look like Mr. Burns.

>>1672

You're a beautiful man, Jim.

>>1696

Thank you