/k/ - Weapons

>canada in charge of not being a retarded /n/igger

>>315409

>only pro 2A and pro constitution supreme court justice dies

>not /k/ related

Also I'm from /fit/ you dumb faggot, I don't even like /pol/.

Immediately came here when I read about it on breitbart. Felt the bottom fall out of my fucking stomach. This is a catastrophe.

>>315404

Ah, fuck. I was hoping they'd all make it through next president.

>>315418

You really need to fuck off, retard. If you really want to pretend so badly that guns and gun rights exist in a bubble and shit like this isn't relative 'to the board's purpose', 4/k/ is literally all you're looking for.

>>315421

I'm not a stormfag you dumb fucking faggot.

>>315425

>You are crypto /pol/, which makes it worse. We pride ourselves on being anti /pol/ here. /k/'s values, one might say.

Oh, so you're just a butthurt /pol/fag false flagging. Are you the same retarded /pol/fag kraut from the brit's nazi cosplay thread that insulted Argentina for confusing Chile with Texas?

>>315426

>kraut

Not even. He's an American with a proxy.

>>315428

Uhuh. Fuck off back to /pol/, retard.

>>315431

This'll be the last time I humor your dumb ass with a response, just wanted to say I reported you for being an obvious /pol/ falseflagging faggot and spamming a board relevant thread.

>Oh_boy_here_we_go_again1.png

Jesus Christ this fucking troll has spammed up 47% of my thread.

>>315439

Even Libertarians have rules.

And Scalia didnt proclaim himself as libertarian. Even if he had done that, it is still irrelevant.

We dont even know how he died.

>>>/pol/ is for all tinfoil shit.

>>315440

NATO did warn us of the power of trolls.

Just filter

>>315444

Oh fuck I forgot about filters.

>>315444

>>315446

Thread is still reported for /pol/ shit.

It is suspicious that he died so close to Obama leaving office, but it's more likely due to his multiple chins not a bullet.

The way I understand it America is going to have a liberal justice branch until at least 2050 now.

>>315444

>Just filter

lol ID+ makes leaves only six visible posts.

The German flag is just Sperg 'Kraut' trying to play a different angle after getting BTFO so many times.

>>315436

>20 millions

>not 6

>muh gorillions

You're literally pulling out all the stops. Everyone can tell you're /pol/, faggot.

>>315431

Your reverse psychology isn't working. /pol/ is shit, but you are more shit.

>>315454

He's trying to counter-troll, make people critical of /pol/posting look bad.

So next time he starts talking about the Jew conspiracy and someone tells him to STFU he can say '''HEY HEY DONT YOU REMEMBER THAT GUY WHO SPAMMED? STOP BEING LIKE HIM!"

It's so childishly transparent that I'm starting to think this faggot is literally a child faggot.

>>315416

I know how you feel.

We're not even American and this shit is just… He was one of the good ones.

>>315473

Nice try, fag. Everyone already figured you out.

>>315414

You can use pol but you have to work harder with filters and page find. Like on this thread.

But it still might be more useful to use /x/. :(

>>315404

Right, because Obama has such a close and cozy relationship with the CIA

>>315479

>crypto/pol/

But that's you, m8.

>>315409

Its very /k/ related as this puts oir gun rights in major jeopordy. Still I see no evidence he was assassinated.

>>315483

Now you even forgot to write. You are a very poor troll. Maybe if you do it hard enough people will begin to defend /pol/ again, in spite of your bullshit.

Even so, why are you mad? Obviously posters dislike /pol/ already, thus calling you out. You should be happy and stop posting. The only reason you keep posting is so you can associate people that don't want Nazi shit everywhere with posters like you. Evidently the reverse approach didn't work.

So back to the topic. They are saying on the news that republicans are calling for the jext judge to be appointed by the next president.

>>315492

Yes, McConnell already stated this was his goal. Still, we may well end up with Shrillary or Bernie Sanders as president.

>>315493

McConnell didn't even stop Loretta Lynch from being made AG, you can't trust a word that comes out of the faggot's mouth.

>>315493

Some of the republican canidates arent much better. Im not even sure how many judges there are that are still like him.

>>315494

I know, but I'm hoping for the best.

>>315497

>>315498

Okay, everyone hates /pol/ now. Why don't you stop posting?

Kraut status: ID+ filtered

>>315500

Then report it and stop posting, you whiny bitch.

>>315494

>>315494

>>315496

Im going to start calling my congress man tomorrow and see where they stand on it. If this goes to another liberal oue gun rights are going down the drain.

>>315497

>can't keep the conversation pure

You are literally the only one bringing /pol/ into this. Because you're /pol/.

>this is why the second amendment is looked at in a bad light

This is obvious doublespeak. Anyone trying to defend gun rights is a reason gun rights should be taken away, according to you. You're getting too transparent, you anti-gun shill. Kill yourself.

>>315501

just report him for rule 7

>7) No whiny faggots allowed

>>315505

Just ignore him.

>>315505

I just filtered him. Kraut is mad.

>sperg'kraut' had his posts deleted but wasn't permabanned

HOTPOCKET STRIKES AGAIN!!!!

>>315518

>mfw this thread is suddenly clean without spergkraut

lol

Anyway, I wonder who would be an apt replacement for Scalia?

I don't really give a damn about the rest of their policies, but I wonder any liberal president has nominated a pro-gun justice.

Bump.

>>315503

I didn't even know Americans had that right.

Doesn't the president appoint justices?

>>315613

They're nominated by the President, but must be confirmed by the Senate, then they can be appointed.

>>315614

Oh you're ok then. Senate is loaded with republicans.

>>315622

Actually they're full of establishment fuckboys

A republican helped move forward the TPP for Obama

>>315622

No, we're on a razor edge. Most of the Republicans are career statists that would do anything to keep their seats. McConnel (who is also my Senator) is a piece of shit that would sell out every last constituent if it meant keeping his seat.

Politics in the US have become so convoluted, the only thing that differentiates the Left from the Right is what special interest groups they represent, but often anything that mutually aids both sides in keeping their seats and generating personal wealth, while shafting their constituency, they'll do it.

All it would take is for Obama to nominate a moderate Republican like Lindsey Graham, someone the Senate would confirm immediately without reservation, but who's political affiliations and personal crusade would trash the shit out of not only our 2nd Amendment Rights, but other rights as well.

Even if Obama nominated a Liberal and the Senate stalled until the President Elect was sworn into office, we have no idea who the next President will be, it could be Hillary or Sanders.

Guys, this is bad, this is soooo bad. You know those funny greentext stories people write about living in a distopian politically correct sjw future? That's literally going to happen if a lib supreme Court Justice gets appointed. Having a conservative leaning supreme court is the one thing that's prevented the government completely scrapping the Constitution. It's more important now than ever that we get trump into office. It might not be enough. We might be seriously, SERIOUSLY fucked.

May God have mercy on our souls.

Also, what if Eric Holder gets appointed?

>>315632

> Guys, this is bad, this is soooo bad. You know those funny greentext stories people write about living in a distopian politically correct sjw future? That's literally going to happen if a lib supreme Court Justice gets appointed. Having a conservative leaning supreme court is the one thing that's prevented the government completely scrapping the Constitution. It's more important now than ever that we get trump into office. It might not be enough. We might be seriously, SERIOUSLY fucked.

>May God have mercy on our souls.

We may end up that way anyway. Even if the Senate stalls until January when the next President is sworn in, Scalia was the only thing keeping back the flood waters, now Obama has a ten month unabated span to do as he wishes and have the SCOTUS interpret it as constitutional.

>>315633

>Also, what if Eric Holder gets appointed?

We may as well beg someone to nuke is.

>>315633

On a scale of 1 to done, I am so done.

>>315632

Most of the others probably don't have another 8 years left in them either

>>315622

>Oh you're ok then. Senate is loaded with republicans

hehehehehe

HAHAHAHAHAHA

You're a Canadian, so I can't blame your for not realizing that our republicans, the so called "right wing" party, is full of leftists.

We're almost as fucked as Europe in regards to our representatives, and it won't be too long until all of them are squawking the exact same shit.

Hell, the shit they're currently squawking is already sounding eerily uniform.

>>315622

They're corprate statists. There really isn't anyone championing the individual citizen's liberty

>another shitty not-/k/ thread

Don't you /pol/edditors have your own board for this shit? Is tabbed browsing alien to you Internet Explorer users?

>>315728

It took you a long time to find a proxy.

>>315404

I could take this seriously without the accusations of assassination. There was a huge autism war over that aspect on /n/.

The focus of the thread should be on making sure the Republicans stall any single attempt to appoint another Sotomayor.

>>315747

>I could take this seriously without the accusations of assassination.

Even if it was an assassination, we're still in the same boat, arguing over how he died is retarded.

>The focus of the thread should be on making sure the Republicans stall any single attempt to appoint another Sotomayor.

Good luck with that, we're either going to see a Republican nominee the grab asses will fast track in confirmation (someone like Graham or McCain) but will fucking sink our rights.

Or the Republicans hold out for fear of losing their seats and Hillary or The Bern get in and nominate the most rabid Leftist they can get and we're just as fucked.

The same shit went down with TARP, constituent response numbers that haven't been seen since Watergate, all demanding "NO" and the fuckers voted for it anyway.

Personally I'd like to see Gowdy on the bench, but Obama would never nominate him and the Republicans can't fucking stand him because he doesn't see "R" or "D", he just sees "Right" and "Wrong".

>>315749

I don't think it's a kraut specifically.

It's more like one of those 4chan autists that couldn't handle a /k/ related topic that wasn't exclusively about some retarded AK vs AR bullshit.

It's the exact same kind of person that legitimately believes that something that directly affects gun rights isn't /k/ worthy.

>>315774

Nah, it's the same damn kraut. It's pretty obvious.

>>315779

We know this. The problem is that getting mad about it isn't going to solve the current problem.

>>315774

4chan /k/ usually has the "take it to /pol/" attitude with even gun rights/gun control legislation. You literally get banned if you bring up something like the hearing protection act.

>>315784

>You literally get banned if you bring up something like the hearing protection act.

Why do you think we are here?

>>315443

No, it's for people who are not in the political mainstream.

Retard.

>>315806

tinfoil isn't in the political mainstream.

>>315808

Tinfoil is part of being outside of the political mainstream, but not all the things outside the political mainstream are tinfoil. Recognizing this is basic logic.

Since this jackarse is incapable of recognizing that, I felt a need to point it out.

inb4 muslim chief justice

inb4 he blows up the other chief justices

inb4 trump selects a full on supreme court

>>315946

>not nominating noted constitutional scholar Barack Hussein Obama for the empty spot in the Supreme Court as soon as he steps down from the presidency

>>315782

Yes it will. You just need to channel the mad into letters to senators. Tell them their job is forfeit if they confirm Obama's appointment.

>>315404

the guy was 79, no one lives forever

He was 79 and was visiting a "men's hunting retreat" whore house . He wasn't murdered.

>>315404

>Supreme Court with a majority Social Justice Warriors

It was only a matter of time. Our only hope now is 3D printed guns. Only technology can make gun bans completely unenforceable. I just wish metal printing had a few more years to get cheaper.

>>316142

interesting

I assume metal printing works exactly like plastic printing? would that mean that you could do the honeycombs like you do with plastic shit so you don't have to fill the entire thing.

>>316158

>I assume metal printing works exactly like plastic printing?

No.

>you could do the honeycombs like you do with plastic shit so you don't have to fill the entire thing.

Yes.

>>316160

sweet

I wonder if guv will be enough of a madman to actually try to prevent the distribution of gun plans, because it would never work.

>>316166

>I wonder if guv will be enough of a madman to actually try to prevent the distribution of gun plans

Boy are you ever behind.

http://massie.house.gov/sites/massie.house.gov/files/documents/MassieAmicus.pdf

>>316142

>Our only hope now is 3D printed guns. Only technology can make gun bans completely unenforceable.

Printed guns are just media hype. Their only advantage is requiring little to no skill or knowledge beyond setting up the printer and downloading a premade plan.

With basic machine tools you can make high quality small arms from scratch. The only problem is rifled barrels, but 3d printing doesn't help with that and it's not impossible to do yourself anyway. If it comes down to it you can make perfectly serviceable guns from scrap metal with a drill and files

I mean, you're right in principle, but you don't have to rely on computers here. The technology that makes gun bans unenforceable has been around for a long time.

Ammo will be a problem eventually though.

>>316322

Yeah, without a way to reliably churn out propellant materials from stuff you can get from a supermarket, ammo is a problem.

If you make a filament that can be used for sand-casting, you might be able to make tools for gun machining. You just need to finish the metal if it works.

>>316320

M-maybe they mean he had one of the pillows stacked vertically over his eyes resting against the headrest so he could use it like a sleep mask. I do that sometimes when it's not too hot.

>>316322

>Their only advantage is requiring little to no skill or knowledge beyond setting up the printer and downloading a premade plan.

Which is a huge advantage. The disadvantages will only diminish as the as people innovate their way out of them within the confines of current materials/process, as the technology develops, and, probably most importantly, as patents expire.

They aren't super useful in developing a gun from the ground up right now, but they are at least superior in precision/effort for things like making mags and reliably feeding shotgun casings for now.

>>316324

>Ammo will be a problem eventually though.

>Yeah, without a way to reliably churn out propellant materials from stuff you can get from a supermarket, ammo is a problem.

Due to manufacturing complexity, production of casings in the biggest obstacle for ammunition manufacture, not propellant. Without the capacity to make casings for modern cartridges, you're severely limited in your choices/performance.

>>316333

You can make ammo out of cheap-shit steel and use it to make non-remanufacturable casings.

Honestly, if Americans are in the position where the only way to get arms and ammo is to make it themselves, and they're not fighting the government for taking away their rights, they do not deserve any rights anymore.

>>316322

>media hype. Their only advantage is requiring little to no skill or knowledge

All you are saying is that they are completely awesome.

>With basic machine tools you can make high quality small arms from scratch

A fucking fully stocked workshop in addition to being a gunsmith with years of training and experience. You just completely destroyed your point.

How many modern, quality guns have you made in your basement, from scratch? Or are you just another deluded wannabe that feels he will suddenly be a master craftsman when the shit hits the fan?

>>316363

you don't really need to be any kind of craftsman to make Lutys in your garage, m9

>>315404

Welp, there goes the last man keeping us safe from fashionable leftism. Prepare your anuses for a lifelong lurch to the Left.

Is there any non-shit country I can move to? It's like I'm watching my country slowly die of cancer.

>>316374

>Lutys

What are they and how many have you made?

>>316390

>what are they

Lurk moar

>how many have you made

ATF please.

>>316377

Depends on what you consider "shit".

>>316320

>>316303

wtf

>>316390

>what are they

I know they're open bolt SMGs but I made an open bolt 20ga by slightly modifying mine to use big-boy parts. I can't wait to make a 12g one.

Oh, and I've made about a dozen so far. Everyone in my family has one. My friends have one. My friends have actually started making their own.

What a fucking disaster

>>316363

>projecting this hard

You'd be surprised what you can learn in your garage if you step away from your computer occasionally. Fabricating parts is a basic skill that you have no excuse for not learning if you want any semblance of self-sufficiency. What will you do when SHTF and a machine you depend on fails for want of a part that any DIY tinkerer could have made in a day?

>inb4 millennial

>Assasinate

The man was nearly 80 and obese. Above the national average life expectancy by a few years.

"pillow over head" =/= clear evidence of suffocation.

Scalia wrote Heller but Thomas was always the most coherent on defending the Second Amendment. Thomas' now-famed dussent in a denial of cert last year is eloquent legal writing and analysis compared to the rambling ass pull that Heller was, giving us this fictitious "in common use" limitation.

The Republucan Majority Senate is at max allert, and Obama is worried about rocking the boat to promote a reactionary response that would sway votes to a Republucan president.

A real lib-agenda assassination of a justice would have happened years ago and would have targeted the healthier and younger justices that had conservative leans.

>>316653

>"pillow over head" =/= clear evidence of suffocation.

It is however enough evidence of foul play for at least an ME examination of the body, if not even an autopsy.

Yet neither was done.

>>316648

You completely failed to answer my question, so I will answer it for you. You have made zero modern, quality guns. You are not a gunsmith and have no business telling people that good guns are easy to make from "scratch" and "scrap metal".

>>317385

Touched a nerve, eh?

>easy

Never said that. Makes sense that you would assume something has to be easy to be possible though.

>>316648

Without anyone around to learn from, what are some good resources? I'm not even talking /k/, I work on old stuff, and have learned 1 thing at time as I fiddle and fuck around, and look up what I can online, but I feel like I'm making shit up as I go. Most of this stuff is old parts that don't exist anymore and no pictures exist, and I probably am not even using a file right.

>>317385

He said serviceable.

Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are refusing to even visits with any potential SCOTUS candidates, let alone any nominees.

Democrats are throwing a hissy fit over it (as usual), lying through their teeth and are threatening to harangue legislation in a sign of "protest".

Of course, Obama's PR campaign has been plastering shit about it all over his Twitter and website, ginning up the hashtag #DoYourJob

They're pissing themselves because they just can't wait to cram another leftists cuck onto the bench to fuck everyone over.

http://archive.is/u9KpX

>>321586

Thank god.

>>321586

I liked the article where previous house rep, I think, said that even though he tried to block Bush appointments on an election year, it's bullshit they are trying to block Obama's on an election year and they should let him do what he wants. I forget if it was a block on old Bush or recent Bush though

So, here's a list of the considerations thus far, that the White House is vetting for SCOTUS:

>Loretta Lynch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loretta_Lynch

https://www.justice.gov/ag/meet-attorney-general

>Paul Watford

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_J._Watford

http://www.afj.org/our-work/nominees/paul-watford

http://abovethelaw.com/tag/paul-watford/

>Merrick B. Garland

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+MBG

>Sri Srinivasan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Srinivasan

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+SS

>Ketanji Brown Jackson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson

http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/kjackson

Reports show Obama favors Jackson, but

>>321705

It's not just one article it's a meme. I remember multiple sources, even memes to the front page of Google/Jewgle news feed saying something like:

"Obama: yeah I tried to filibuster SCOTUS candidates in an election year while I was a senator but yall need to let that go and approve mine…"

It's like /pol/ has said, in many ways they are not trying to hide it anymore.

>>326790

I'm assuming they're all the kind of people who worship the state because they're the ones favored by it? Or at least, all anti-gun authoritarians who would never give idiots like us sharp objects?

>>327797

I'm sure they are, but unlike politicians, judges aren't openly exposed for their bias. By virtue, they're suppose to be impartial, using the law as their benchmark, but anyone with a brain knows a judge is using a personal or political bias when making a ruling.

They don't even have to be Statists, all they need to be is a "Yes Man". Some one who's going to support rulings that are favored by the Progressives and dissent against rulings that are hated by the Progressives.

How many potential Obama nominees do you think would sell their soul to become a Supreme Court Justice? Even if it meant sending the country down the river?

>>327825

Right, there's still some months left.

Merrick Garland is the Obama pick for SCOTUS nominee;

http://archive.is/IcKNs