/k/ - Weapons

GAS THE CHINKS, COLD WAR NOW

>>327266

To be honest, there are a ton of "regular" gay people who you just never see because… they are regular people. It's those attention whoring fags who steal the show and give the whole group a bad name.

>>327259

it's 2016 russia how are you not LGBT

can't we all agree it's 2016

progress

>We will see a increase anti-Chinese Propaganda.

I don't like liberalism but I don't like chinks either. I'm allowed to hate both before getting accused of being some gay-loving western liberal. China is utter shit and anyone with an internet connection can find out all about their disastrous social engineering policies and building projects that still affect the country to this day.

>>327259

China is getting more based by the day.

>>327282

>It's not a geopolitical strategy, it's propaganda strategy

Under Obama it's the same thing. Bitching about Russia needs more gays and trannies is all he done. Russia building military bases in Cuba as we speak under Obama watch.

>>327306

China already grew larger. Most of the army recruits in the Beijing are fat and most of their new troops are too tall for current equipment.

>>327308

for real?

>>327309

Yeah it's hilarious to think about it. Amazing what not starving two generations can do.

>>327309

>>327309

They are issuing the QBZ-03 to troops for some reason. I think it has something to do with the QBZ-95's size. I'm not sure.

>>327312

Pretty much. Yet this guy is a anti-trump Hillary Clinton supporting cuck. Even though trump the most anti-Chinese front runner

>>327313

I can attest the '95 is rather uncomfortable for anyone over 6'.

>>327317

>>327318

That's why the second version of the VHS has an adjustable stock. They got many complaints from soldiers that it was too uncomfortable. I guess the guy who designed the first version was short.

>>327285

>>327297

Now, this is the main difference between Croats and Serbs.

>>327325

I thought one like their food cooked and one likes meat raw

>>327281

Still doesn't change the fact all gays are degenerate.

>>327309

Also Chink military equipment only costs 1.5k and their current guns suck.

>>327306

>>327308

You guys got your ass kicked by the MIGHT OF THE GLA.

Eeeh I guess a world of black haired, black eyed, arr rook same people wouldn't be that bad.

>>327282

Why are you always so butthurt? The Russian law against gay propaganda and child sex ed made perfect fucking sense, even in liberal terms.

>it's propaganda strategy

And it's failing because the average Russian doesn't care about gay rights. The average Russian wants the government to kill journalists and secretly invade countries.

So? Good for them. Who cares about whiny cunts and faggots?

Chinks can still kiss our ass, though.

What's the point in celebrating this? Chinese government is no different from progressives when it comes to ruining people's lives for wrong opinions and brainwashing the populace to follow the desired ideology. And neither is it more capable judging by their inability to tackle any of the major issues. Not only that, but banning things like feminism will just make them more attractive to Chinese oppositionaries and contrarian youth.

On an unrelated note, nuke general best general.

Yeah,if Trump does not win the elections, WWIII is going to suck most for us. We will have to choose between

>Kinda-Badass-But-You-Get-Put-In-Gulag sorta communism

Or

>Trippy-Faggot-Sweden-Cuck communism

>>327385

> Chink military equipment only costs 1.5k and their current guns s

Modern NATO forces probably can't handle real Zerg storm.

>>327427

Just wait until you read the Wikipedia article on the PLA infantry

>Protective equipment not issued to troops because it would "curb their fighting spirit"

>Only two radio sets are issued to each company

>Few soldiers I'm squad have compasses

>Less have Night vision

>>327433

*in squad

>>327427

Maybe starting WWIII will be China's latest depopulation scheme. Have the filthy gwailo kill your own people for you.

>>327422

as ancient Slavic philosophy says, there are always at least three ways. you need faith that tomorrow will be better

>>327266

We won and got hedonistic, lazy, and stupid.

>>327441

Is it really worth it?

Besides, a war is much more effective for population decreases.

>>327433

Careful Hong Kong, Big Brother is probably watching.

>>327437

>there are always at least three ways

>one side that you absolutely fucking hate

>another side you hate a bit less but only because they are fighting against the side you REALLY hate

>fighting for yourself, which is almost always a suicide mission

I guess some things never change

how the fuck is this /k/ related?

>>327460

all the boards on this chan evolved like /tg/ did. its not "/k/-weapons", its "/k/-weapons and /k/ community"

so yeah basically we can talk about whatever we want.

>>327439

Our current government is so greedy that they had a "chimpout", because they couldn't get a cut from the money Norway was sending to Cultural Marxists NGOs here. So they actually went on until they were the ones in charge of that money. Shit's hilarious.

>>327460

>cold war

>not /k/ related

War has changed, bratanki. Now it's about homosexual chimpouts and feminist bullshit.

>>327460

OP put the word war in the subject so its totally /k/ related guys!

>>327460

I'm not going to tell you to leave. I want to know what the fuck in you're extremely narrow view qualifies as /k/ related.

>>327463

Better to have that money embezzled than to have it go directly to the cunts trying to subvert your country.

>>327386

>THE MIGHT OF ISIS

Fixed that for you

>>327460

>how the fuck is this /k/ related?

Talking about Geopolitical stuff and propaganda is /k/ related

>>327433

Do you think China will force mandatory draft if there's a world war 3?

>>327507

Obviously. Whether or not actually arming them is a different story.

>>327396

>you always

There are at least 2 Jewkrainian flags here in /k/.

>butthurt

Where? If I said without emotions that some inefficient system is inefficient or Democratic Party sucks, it's "butthurt" now?

>The Russian law against gay propaganda and child sex ed made perfect fucking sense

No sense at all. I even tried to shut down a few SJW shitholes in the Russian analogue of Facebook using this gay propaganda law, but it takes a shitload of bureaucracy so it's impossible to use. Impossible for average people - of course influential Russians can fight with opposition like it was in USSR where political activists suspiciously often turned out to be "gay" and jailed for it.

>The average Russian wants

Thank you Captain Obvious. This kind of propaganda isn't for use outside of leftist Western countries.

All these mongol shitholes have always been fucked up.

>>327259

Wait, wait, guys, don't you realize?

Remember Red Dawn remake? They originally planned to have China as antagonist, but had to change it to North Korea so the China would not ban it.

North fucking Korea.

Taking over USA.

In the remake of ultra-patriotic movie.

This means Western media will do anything to appease Chinese censors.

Enjoy gay-free movies, guys.

At very least it means that there will be a war between SJWs and people who want to make money off the movies. This is gonna be glorious.

>>327565

>There are at least 2 Jewkrainian flags here in /k/.

I am at least one of them and it was assigned to me by my proxy, so don't count on that.

>>327729

Forget one thing my friend. Current Hollywood care more about producing progressive feminist propaganda than making a profit. Look at all those news sites openly bashing ghostbusters fans for disliking Cisbusters for being unfunny. Bashing i mean attacking cis male nerds. Aka The biggest movie consumer group that actually matter.

>>327747

>if you pay any attention to geopolitics it's the language to be learning right now.

The chinese stock market is collapsing like…Well, like communism. If you pay attention to geopolitics the language you should be learning is yiddish

>>327754

Still, there's 1.3 billion chinese people and their government is actually competition. If WW3 comes being able to speak English and Chinese will save your life more than anything.

>>327755

Competent *

>>327747

the democrats wants to adopt a literal feminist foreign policy. If Hillary Clinton wins. I'll learn Russian. Because we are heading to a Ghost in the shell style geopolitical world under Hillary Clinton.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jan/16/hillary-clinton-feminist-foreign-policy

http://ghostintheshell.wikia.com/wiki/Russo-American_Alliance

>>327757

I can see Russia getting into some heavy fighting with Eurabia if that happens. china doesn't have any threats like that besides the US, and if the US goes feminist, we're all going to leave.

>>327460

>>327464

>not on muh /k/, gunz only

>Not understanding the implications and ramifications of geopolitics and national propaganda in relation to conflict…

It's as if you think conflict just, "happens".

Russo-American superalliance when? Chinese steel is too brittle anyway.

>>327436

It would be nice, but Hong Kong is way too small. At least Rhodesia had arable land, and South Africa gave them support for a long time. At least that's my point of view. If they could ally with the ROC at Taiwan and some other anti-Chinese countries at the Far East would be nice.

>>327422

I would go there and become a foreign volunteer to help you, even if I end getting killed removing dirty mainlanders, you guys are alright.

>>327729

>This means Western media will do anything to appease Chinese censors.

Also, remember that more and more movies are located in mainland China, especially in the largest and most developed cities and in some slums. If this isn't some form of shilling from the Jews at Hollywood, paid by the asian equivalent of the western jews, then I don't know what it is.

>>327747

I once knew a colombian girl that was learning mandarin, she worked on a tv channel. She also had fucking sweet, natural tits.

>>327757

>>327793

>Russo-American Alliance

Just pray that when this happens, some bunch of masked cunts and some crazy ass US general don't fuck everything and end triggering a nuclear war.

>>327795

>remember that more and more movies are located in mainland China

Ok, it seems that I wasn't being quite clear: many movies now film a lot of scenes in Chinese cities, and they tend to sometimes being relevant to the plot, and sometimes it just feels that they were shoe-horned into the plot.

I'm sorry if can't explain myself in a clear way, I just caught the flu, my eyes hurt, and I can't concentrate.

>>327755

>Chinks

>Not being notoriously shit at everything

Sure they may make uncomfortable bullpups at an extremely low cost and a whole plethora of other 99 cent junk but the one thing they can't ever do is fight anyone. Only army they beat were a bunch of Tibetans who were armed with muzzleloaders and even then they can't oppress them right.

>>327800

That sounds like TF2 shit

>>327755

>their government is actually competent

Top kek. You should lay off the CCTV and Peoples Daily, it's starting to make you believe things that aren't true. This is a country that built a dam on a fault line and is doing it again as part of their overseas building project in Honduras.

>>327747

You should be learning something fun. Maybe Russian or Japanese.

>>327799

>>327821

In their defence, they did manage to colonise Zimbabwe Karma's a bitch, Mugabe, and they brought out a great deal of Australia Libcucks, that's why

>>327848

The best thing about the PLA is that none of their top brass are actually military men, but instead they are party officials.

>>327852

Ohohoh oh yeah I forgot to mention that.

Hilarious, I don't think any of them have even ever had any combat experience.

>>327854

Some of Jiang Zemin's crew had Tiananmen Square "combat" command experience.

>>327799

>>327800

>>327803

>>327821

Whatever m8 they just banned the depiction of gays when most of our countries are 1 step away from being lead by a tranny.

I'd rather have a shotty military than treason from within.

>>327887

China being strong on internal control doesn't make them strong at war.

>Fuck no. China cannot into war. Russians literally used wooden forks to remove them from premises.

Zhenbao Island incident.

>They were so bad they lost a war to fucking Vietnam.

So did the US.

>If actual large-scale conflict with China will happen, you just need to bring down some dams to wash them away.

Wat?

>The biggest danger in war with China is that you end up accidentally conquering them and will have to feed their population and inevitably end up getting assimilated into ching chong hivemind.

What are nuclear weapons?

>>327927

The Chinks aren't going to let US just wipe out a dam without retaliation.

It's one thing to covertly attack petro-chemical facilities, refineries, ect… A dam is a different kettle of fish altogether, it would require very obvious overt means, like a cruise missiles, which the Chinks could quickly deduce the origin of.

Even if a plan was concocted to use Taiwanese sappers in a coordinated strike, which would require an ridiculous amount of explosives…the US has already played it's card by openly threatening to strike the dam.

Even if the Chinks don't retaliate using conventional means, it's be real cute when suddenly the US is left in economic turmoil because China has banned temporarily exports to the US and gone apeshit with cyber-attacks against US interests.

The second US Forces set foot in mainland China, they'd "Great Wall" their own soil.

>>327949

>Even if the Chinks don't retaliate using conventional means, it's be real cute when suddenly the US is left in economic turmoil because China has banned temporarily exports to the US

Thanks for confirming you're some PRC shill. If you think China's doing us some sort of favor by flooding our shores with their crap you must have lost your goddamned mind. There's a reason every candidate but Shillary is talking about instituting tariffs against China.

>>327953

>Thanks for confirming you're some PRC shill.

Nice bait, fuckface.

>If you think China's doing us some sort of favor by flooding our shores with their crap you must have lost your goddamned mind.

>favor

No, I don't think they're doing us some sort of favor, shit for brains, but there is NOTHING left of our manufacturing base. We sell fucking steel to the Chinks just to have it sent back, we buy huge swathes of produce and goods from them…because our production capabilities are all, but FUCKING GONE.

You must be some fucking next level retard if you think the US could somehow just somehow immediately sever times with China and not instantly be in the economic shitter.

>There's a reason every candidate but Shillary is talking about instituting tariffs against China.

>tariffs

Well isn't that just fucking neato, but "talking" and "implementing" are to totally completely different things. Tariffs are also NOT reducing reliance on China, if anything it fucking increases it, because those tariffs will be use to fund governmental programs…then when China does make a move, we're twice as fucked because what dog shit tier imports that where coming here stop…the tariffs stop too.

Have fun shopping for anything that's "American Made" when the Chink shit stops flowing in…better have a shitload of shekels set aside to combat the rising demand and the inevitable price gouging.

Come fucking back here and sling your bullshit when we build back up our manufacturing, production, and infrastructure without reliance on Chinese imports, investment, or loans.

Until then, get a fucking clue, pal.

>>327949

>gone apeshit with cyber-attacks against US interests.

You say that as if they don't do that already.

>>327949

You realize by "putting us in economic turmoil" they would have to fair a 10 times worse storm? Plus international backlash?

Their economy is already falling apart, this would put a bullet in its brainpan.

Also lol "Great Wall", like that worked at all.

>>327422

Just shut up and come to Argentina.

>>327904

But when the other nations are dying from within, it does.

Imagine in 50 years American can't even field an army because everyone's either too fat or doesn't want to fight.

>>327973

They don't, that shit is mundane. If they pulled all the stops our critical national infrastructure would be toast.

>>327976

>You realize by "putting us in economic turmoil" they would have to fair a 10 times worse storm?

They have the means and bodies to feed into the thresher…we don't.

>Plus international backlash?

topfuckingkek

>Their economy is already falling apart, this would put a bullet in its brainpan.

Sure it would, but we'd hit bottom way before they did, giving them the upper hand. China also stands a chance of recovery…we'd be fucked.

>Also lol "Great Wall", like that worked at all.

"Great Wall" is in referencing to their "Underground Great Wall" aka China's nuclear weapons doctrine and deployment.

>>327985

> China isnt dying.

> Someone is becoming worse at war, that means the worst can win!

You are retarded arent you.

>>327985

In 50 years China will be a wasteland with the Gobi Desert rapidly expanding and droughts decimating the north of the country. 70% of their water supply is tainted and the air in their cities is fucked.

America might not be great, but neither is China.

>>327988

China could have a coup from that many deaths. It took us one shitty war against Britain where a lot less people died for one.

>>327988

> China stands a chance of recovery

lolwut

>>327966

>this whole fucking post

>still pretending you're not a PRC shill

Hey dumbfuck, it is always, ALWAYS easier to find some third world slave child to manufacture something than it is to find a wealthy country to buy it. The world has a ready supply of third world labor. America can get what it gets from China from plenty of other countries, China can't get what it gets from America from ANYWHERE else. There just isn't another buyer that big. There isn't even anybody that comes close.

The sooner your retarded 'apocalypse' happens the sooner manufacturing returns to the United States by the way.

>Tariffs are also NOT reducing reliance on China, if anything it fucking increases it

You might be the dumbest person I've ever met.

>>327988

Man, China is really stepping up it's propaganda.

>>327994

well, everything stands a chance of recovery. fuck, if we put enough manpower into it we could make sahara green again(?)

>>327992

coup is guaranted, it is how it always was and always will be.

>>327999

>>still pretending you're not a PRC shill

Still touting that bait.

>Hey dumbfuck, it is always, ALWAYS easier to find some third world slave child to manufacture something than it is to find a wealthy country to buy it.

You really are fucking stupid.

>The world has a ready supply of third world labor. America can get what it gets from China from plenty of other countries, China can't get what it gets from America from ANYWHERE else.

You really don't know how the world works…do you?

>There just isn't another buyer that big. There isn't even anybody that comes close.

http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_122530.pdf

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2061.html

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2050.html

>The sooner your retarded 'apocalypse' happens the sooner manufacturing returns to the United States by the way.

Thanks for the laugh.

>You might be the dumbest person I've ever met.

Yeah, says the fucking moron.

>>328036

I'd buy a trump fallout shirt

>>327887

Well, there is still one important question left - did they actually banned depiction of gays? Western media likes to exaggerate this kind of thing, you know. Like how Russia banned propaganda of homosexuality to minors, and Western media spun it into "RUSSIA CRIMINALIZED GAYS AND PUTIN PERSONALLY HUNTS THEM DOWN AND KILLS THEM DEAD, LETS BRING AS MANY FAGS AS POSSIBLE TO WINTER OLYMPICS TO GET HIM OUT OF CLOSET".

>>328106

It becomes more ironic when you realize that all the shit the US did on the Cold War to stop commies would go to shit because some pot smoking lazy entitled kids believe socialism will work, no matter how many times has failed

>>328134

Yeah Africa is a wonderful place after the West left and China came in isn't it?

>>328149

>implying China was a wonderful place when the West was there

>>328152

>implying it's any better now

>>328153

Well, the thing is, Africa is shithole with or without socialism, and China is shithole with socialism, and India is shithole without socialism, but China is less of a shithole than an India, and Russia was more of a shithole without socialism than with socialism, and all this stuff means that socialism doesn't works.

>>328157

>Africa is shithole with or without socialism

Rhodesia and South Africa were actually pretty well off before socialism though

>>328159

For whites. This only means that whites work and blacks don't.

>>328160

Standard of living was also much better for blacks than it is now under socialism though

>>328161

Well, yeah. Because whites were in charge. When they removed whites, they became shitholes. Socialism doesn't has to do with anything, plenty of African countries are shit without socialism.

>>328163

>When they removed whites, they became shitholes.

That still doesn't really explain the white countries that were ruined by socialism, like Yugoslavia

>>328163

It's much worse under socialism though.

Capitalist African countries do better than their communist neighbors, despite having mostly the same races and cultures in both countries.

>>328166

>It's much worse under socialism though

Like Somali, right?

>>328164

Yugoslavia was ruined by socialism, and not by NATO? Also, this still doesn't really explains modern Europe, which has socialism, yet is still pretty successful - at least their problems (such as immigration) are not directly caused by it.

>>328170

>Defining plunging population rates, surveillance state, lack of a proper army to speak of, and lack of human rights as "successful"

>>328170

>this still doesn't really explains modern Europe, which has socialism, yet is still pretty successful - at least their problems (such as immigration) are not directly caused by it.

Also this >>328172

>>328172

>plunging population rates, surveillance state, lack of a proper army to speak of, and lack of human rights

And what does this have to do with socialism? Soviet Union had population growth and proper army, while modern capitalist Russia still has lack of human rights and is not a surveillance state only because government is too incompetent to actually enforce the laws they are making.

>>328170

You need to take a seat and look back at how high your standard of living used to be.

> immigration not caused by socialism

socialist politicians, with no accountability to you, are importing people to replace you. how is this hard to define?

>>328178

I'm not actually from France, that flag is from proxy.

>>328176

If you're comparing the excesses and executions of the USSR to modern Russia, your understanding of history is fucking woeful.

Surveillance and erosion of rights are direct results of Cultural Marxism. The weakening of the army is from the left-wing parties going "pls no bully brown people." >>328178 points out the issue with left wing-endorsed immigration.

France used to be a world power. Now it's the bitch of Germany, which in turn is split between being the bitch of the Arab world and the US.

>>328170

>Yugoslavia was ruined by socialism, and not by NATO?

>Tito wuz g8 lik dis if u crei everytim

I have to hear this shit all the time. You really should go read up some actual history about Yugoslavia instead of just watching "Weight of Chains".

Also the current problems of immigration are not only caused by socialist politicians they are amplified by socialist policies like socialized healthcare and handouts from the governments.

>>328181

Cultural Marxism =/= Socialism

>If you're comparing the excesses and executions of the USSR to modern Russia

And yet population of Russia decreased only twice since 1917 - during WW2 and during capitalism. Seriously - last thing I need is an American teaching me on history of my own fucking country.

>>328182

>current problems of immigration are not only caused by socialist politicians

If socialist politicians are doing something it doesn't automatically means that it is part of socialism.

>>328184

It's almost like the opening of borders after the fall of communism let people migrate to countries that aren't shitholes.

>>328186

Migration was only around 80-100 thousand people per year. Besides, kebabs were also moving in from ex-Soviet Whateverstans. This doesn't accounts for the loss of 8 million of population between 1994 and 2009.

>>328188

And the fertility rate was already falling since 1987, with drops from 1960-1980 before that. If your population loss was directly tied to the absence of communism, you'd see the downward turn begin in 1989-1991 instead.

None of this changes the fact that you're just parroting the "my specific brand of socialism hasn't been tried before," despite the welfare state and handouts directly causing the issues of socialist nations.

>>328198

>since 1987

So, since Perestroika?

>with drops from 1960-1980 before that

Drops in fertility rates happened (especially in 60s, when abortions were decriminalized), but mortality rates mostly remained stable until 90s when they skyrocketed.

>my specific brand of socialism hasn't been tried before

Actually, my specific brand of socialism was tried, and it worked well enough that it took thirty years, three incompetent rulers and enormous effort from the West (as said here >>328108 ) to bring it down

>>328208

Ah yes, that excellence of communism that never let the standard of living never catch up to the west. Or, if you ignore the inherent inefficiency of a planned economy, the lack of skilled labor, and economic stagnation, then it worked "well enough," despite still being wholly inferior to capitalism.

>>328215

Yeah, sure, USSR was never able to catch up with west because communism doesn't works, not because of different conditions. But sure, as soon as communism fell, gap between two economies immediately became smaller, right? Remember the economic wonder of Russia in 90s? Me neither.

>>328217

And yet China managed to catch up quite nicely as soon as Deng Xiaoping liberalized the economy, at which point it became a financial player where it was a primitive shithole before. Are you also going to pull some magic example out of your ass as to how that wasn't a failure of socialism?

>>328024

>no ur stupid ur stupid UR STUPID HERE HAVE SOME CIA FACTBOOKS THAT REINFORCE YOUR POINT THAT NOBODY HAS ANYTHING CLOSE TO THE PURCHASING POWER OF THE UNITED STATES

You sure showed me.

>>328232

Wasn't liberalization of the economy Hu Yaobang's idea?

>>328235

PRC pls go and stay go.

>>328236

Deng set out the broad policy goals like limited privatization, more autonomy to provincial economies, and a focus on exports. Hu expanded these, and had more cultural and social reforms as well, like getting rid of Mao's personality cult.

>>328269

>We STALKER now.

I am ok with this

>>328006

>it's capitalism's fault I can't get a good job!

>>328170

The standard of living in Somalia improved significantly after it got rid off socialism. It's still a shithole, but not that much shittier than its neighbors.

>>327259

Expect hollywood to go full right-wing then

>wtf why anon?

The chinese market is HUGE

Why you think the chinese are getting so much 'fanservice' in burgerstani movies as of late?

From 2012 to the martian you have movies pandering to the chinese and how awesome they are, and the last transformers was basically chinese military propaganda

Hollywood even censors bad depictions of the chinese nationals because the chingchong gov will fucking ban not only that movie but every movie from that studio for a decade if they pull any shit moves

So expect SJW bullshit to get toned down a whole fucking lot because studios cant fucking afford to lose the chinese market

>>328901

That pic of Hayek is just begging to be capped.

>Oh, so do you believe in marxism? Come, sit down and lemme explain you why ur a fuggign retard.

>>328901

>Hayek and TRtS

Muh slav

The Road to Serfdom in available in a condensed version for free from the Mises Institute for anyone interested. Like the first 100 or so pages of For a New Liberty (Murray Rothbard) it seriously rustles the jimmies of so called 'intellectuals' (especially Marxists).

https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Road%20to%20serfdom.pdf

>>328923

Based Chile does it again.

>>328922

I'm not a dedicated Austrian School fanboy, but that book is exactly what we all need now.

>>327317

He usually stays out of US politics though, and is pretty entertaining when he shits on China.

>>328873

>Hollywood going right wing

Ha ha ha ha