e980e1 No.332381
Like I seriously don't get this argument. Its typically done by gender specials or those that support them so why use it as a means of insult? These are typically the same people that say having a boy wear a dress is fine/toxic masculinity is bad/objects can and cannot be gendered/etc. Can you not own a gun and be a transfaggot to these people or something?
They claim to believe that gender roles are bad/are social constructs yet will then try to shame those who disagree with them by saying they have small dicks/are compensating. Which is also something that runs counter to their views. I thought you didn't need a to have a dick to be a man, and that these gender stereotypes are false or don't exist?
This isn't even getting into the whole dildo edits thing. Which considering how sex/gender obsessed these people tend to be, why is having a dildo an insult? Couldn't it be seen as kink shaming or homophobic from their view? Since they are saying guns=dildos and guns=bad, therefore dildos=bad?
I am seriously trying to figure out all this shit.
Also pics/edits to fuck with this line of reasoning if you got any.
bb7a85 No.332390
>>332381
They are r type scum, they don't think too much, they just feel. Guns are scary, that much you have to admit. This is why you have to handle them with responsibility and know how to use them properly.
They just don't trust their fellow humans, because they don't trust themselves. But they trust the feeling of being a part of the herd, and that means that they trust their herders. And this is why they have no problem with giving away all freedom to the state.
Again, don't search for logic, but for instincts. They are animals. They try to shame people for liking guns only because this is what their instincts and herders told them to do.
5c40e3 No.332391
I think people who think guns are masculine are just insecure, both the "guns are the manifest thing ever" and the "you like thing? You must have small penis!" Crowds
I am not all that sure what guns, cars, or working out has to do with dick size
7ac03c No.332392
I've taken to throwing a flag recently in compliment to whatever argument I make.
I find that a lot of anti-gunners don't like the idea of people owning guns until they carry one. Then, suddenly, everyone should carry a .38 and the world would be safer with more armed civilians. At least, this is what I've found with almost all of my friends and significant others.
In response to OP's pic:
My last girlfriend has penis envy, and it was honestly pretty fucking hot dating an almost-trap. I miss the weird shit we were into.
aeadd1 No.332398
>>332391
It's simple, things that men generally like will get the connotation "manly." Especially if it involves doing rough stuff like smashing your head into people during footbowl. Or fighting the Natzees and Charlies etc, even when all you ever do is go to the range.
19c818 No.332405
>>332381
I think they just use it to undermine manliness >>332398 that isn't directed where they want it or shows them to be the r-selected >>332390
Notice how they never use that argument against women, they know it only works to shame men with.
>why is having a dildo an insult?
Because they know that the vast majority of people with dildos are women. Women are the only normal people for whom sticking random things in their bodies is common and not thought badly of. And by saying you are like women, undermining manliness again. If a guy just said 'OMG, it IS just like a dildo! I love dildos! I'm gonna go buy more guns to put in my drawer' the argument would either get shut down, or they would call the guy a sissy or something.
They say they shaming is bad, but look at what they do, not what they say.
>>332392
In response to your last gf, I don't even know how that works.
aeadd1 No.332424
>>332381
>This isn't even getting into the whole dildo edits thing.
Those are honestly kind of funny. I could have a sense of humor about it, but I know they're made as a cowardly shaming tactic by big pusses.
Even if you point out the hypocrisy of them essentially calling gun owners faggots, they would just backpedal like
>strelok sweaty, I was only making fun of homophobic gun owners smh end gun violence
ea2abb No.332425
This argument is predicated on the idea that people are blank slates, and only "pretend" to be a certain way for other people. Men pretend to be masculine because they want other people to see them so. Women pretend to be feminine because they want other people to see them so.
Reality: Men act masculine because they are male and women act feminine because they are female. They act this way across cultures, as newborn babies, and in the complete absence of other people, because it is a biological part of them as much as an organ or a limb.
Wanting to make people into interchangeable cogs of a machine is a consequence of industrialism and some religions.
8bb2c0 No.332428
Having a gun is a nice substitute for power.
If you don't like having power you're not a fucking human being.
f6c15b No.332429
Your problem is that you unknowingly bought into their bullshit. They twisted your head so hard that you are worrying about their arguments and thinking if they are sexist or homophobic.
Their entire system of belief is filled with holes and the only reason most of these people have those ideas is to feel good about being useless cunts. All their arguments for gun control are either appeals to emotion or petty shaming tactics.
aeadd1 No.332433
>>332425
>This argument is predicated on the idea that people are blank slates, and only "pretend" to be a certain way for other people.
Not necessarily. You could say that some men are naturally manly, and others are pretending by surrounding themselves with possessions that connote manliness. As in, by owning guns and muscle cars.
aeadd1 No.332436
>>332429
>worrying about their arguments and thinking if they are sexist or homophobic.
But it IS sexist and homophobic if you follow their logic.
Sexist against men, which counts for like, I dunno half. But they do have their "toxic masculinity" thing, which is basically supposed to mean "how men suffer from sexism."
f6c15b No.332442
>>332436
Why should you follow their logic when they don't do it when they shame gun owners?
Stop worrying about their made up -isms and phobias.
aeadd1 No.332445
>>332442
>Why should you follow their logic when they don't do it
Precisely so that everyone can see that you are following logical reasoning and they are not.
f6c15b No.332461
>>332445
So getting caught is part of your plan?
b3fc42 No.332468
>>332381
they use it as an insult because they use masculinity as an insult.
welcome to the post feminist lgbtbbq insanity.
>>332392
you're lucky you ex'd her before she tried to steal yours in your sleep with some scissors
29496c No.332471
Most people who equate owning a gun with being insecure about their masculinity have a very immature idea of what masculinity is, and are often just trying to attack what they think is the male energy. It's just one form of "dismantling the patriarchy."
>>332424
God bless Milo "Least Annoying Gay" Yiannopoulos
19c818 No.332476
>>332471
He's still annoying as fuck. I wonder if there are a lot of them like donovan who aren't annoying. Then again, I've never seen video of him like I have of milo, so his faggotry may be obvious, too.
e980e1 No.332480
>>332392
I don't know that shit reminds me fallacy fags. The kinda people that just scream ad hominem or something to show you how smart they are. When they typically either stretching it to fit or just don't even know them correctly.
7fab97 No.332481
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>332476
he's pretty faggy too tbh fam
29496c No.332483
>>332476
I mean, I bet it's pretty fucking hard to be gay and not annoying. First they've got more estrogen in their system which makes them more moody and histrionic, and then they have sex 50,000 times a day which makes you feel like you're a fucking god.
I mean, statistically speaking, if you're talking to a gay man he's likely had sex at least 8 times that day before talking to you, and you can't tell me that you wouldn't be an pompous motherfucker if you just came out of your 4th 6-way that day.
ea659e No.332485
OP, these are the people who are worrying you. It's OK, they're expert manipulators (they kind of have to be, it's their only strategy after all). Step back and think about the nonsensical bullshit they're trying to foist on you, is it really something you think you need to worry about?
ea659e No.332486
File: 1458075369502.jpg (44.12 KB, 685x437, 685:437, This is what feminism look….jpg)
>>332485
Here, have another one, because it's kind of funny.
19c818 No.332491
>>332481
seems like just an amateur speaker with lots of -sh- noises
>>332483
Nah, it's because they're like girls a lot of times. Girls are just as annoying, but guys tend to put up with it because fucking.
aa990f No.333973
File: 1458313340312.jpg (36.64 KB, 536x417, 536:417, not having sex with women ….jpg)
>>332486
I got a whole treasure-trove of this stuff.
a354fc No.334001
female jealousy, basically.
women and bitch manginas can't stand that there are free people out there, living their lives.
c2d74e No.334014
I dunno about you guys, but after being exposed by the various bullshit people and the media like to peddle about the definition of manliness, I got confused and I just ignored the whole concept to enjoy shit like funz.
I mean, it goes like this, about the definition of manliness:
>"You should learn how to shoot guns to be manly, son." (US perception)
>"Guns are for pussies, learn how to fight like a real man, with swords!" (Animu/fantasy bullshit)
>"Weapons are dishonorable! Real men fight with fists!" (Asian perception)
>"Fighting with force is for weak-minded people! Learn to fight with reason!" (Liberal perception)
See what I mean? So, fuck it, why should I pay attention to this penis/masculinity argument?
e130fd No.334016
>>334014
Most people equate manliness with some sort of form of honor. Which in the real world honor is useless and has no place in fighting, unless you are in a setting which you have agreed to fight someone on said terms and regulations.
280730 No.334109
>>333974
fuck that last one makes my blood boil
62350c No.334112
>>332433
All men are naturally manly, because all men are men.
Might as well say some rocks are rocky, or some clouds aren't cloudy.
6932c8 No.334194
>>332476
General rule of thumb is if you can tell a guy is gay just be being near him, he are probably annoying
24be65 No.334216
>>332486
>similar to original sin
"It is wrong to call a man damned; but it is absolutely right to call him damnable." – G.K. Chesterton, while explaining that one of the keys to not fucking up is to know you can fuck up. He then goes on to note that this is why Original Sin is such an important point of the Bible.
Learn some fucking theology.
280730 No.334230
>>334216
yeah, Original sin is something that you can get out of if you confirm/take communion.
Actual religions are less fundamental than these chuckle fucks
24be65 No.334243
>>334230
Actually, depending on who you ask, Jesus saved everyone–meaning nobody is affected by the original sin, since Jesus died for it. Thus, the only way to be damned is to keep sinning.
But NOOOO, Original Sin totally means that we're all fucked. I'm pretty sure the reason Jesus had to go tell everyone that they were OK was that people gave up since they're all fucked anyway, lol original sin amirite?
eb0e5a No.334268
Pretty sure this r-selected vs k-selected stuff is horseshit fam. Liberals don't have shorter gestation or larger litter sizes, nor do they invest less in each of their offspring. Theory conflates a bunch of things SWPLs do and a bunch of things bix noods do.
>>332424
>Those are honestly kind of funny. I could have a sense of humor about it, but I know they're made as a cowardly shaming tactic by big pusses.
Yeah, the first time I saw those I thought it was a /k/ thing.
7c208c No.334275
>>334268
>Pretty sure this r-selected vs k-selected stuff is horseshit fam
This. Liberals are trash but there's no reason to justify that with retarded pseudoscience.
021e7a No.334385
>>333974
>second one
How in the fucking fuck is that even humanly possible? Was the damn dildo made of fucking playdo or something?
I'm fucking 6', so if it was a 3' dildo, it'd literally be from my waist to my head…How the fuck…
90bb67 No.334464
>your gun is just a dick replacement
>because you are secretly having dick issues
I'd love to introduce them to this cute girl I know who fucking loves shotguns, seeing as how anyone who wants to gun will regardless of gender.
ea659e No.334465
File: 1458381923307.png (133.77 KB, 1308x699, 436:233, Guns are actually vaginas.png)
>>334464
I'm surprised this hasn't been posted yet.
Try using this argument the next time you hear someone talking about 'lol gunz r dickss', you get a fairly hilarious reaction.
d1ba4a No.334469
>>334465
so guns are like trannies?
or are ammo tins all male?
ea659e No.334501
>>334469
I'd say they were more like hermaphrodites than trannies (they are both rather than switching from one to the other).
338b06 No.334506
>>334465
Wasnt the Yin white and the Yang black?
ea659e No.334509
>>334506
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_yang
Yin translated into English, feminine, the moon, shaded, passive, negative, covert/concealed, overcast also treacherous/sinister just to rustle feminist jimmies as efficiently as possible
Yang, translated into English, Male, the sun, open, positive, active again, many feminist jimmies were rustled
From that I'd say that interpreting the yin as dark and the yang as light was sound.
0639a6 No.334731
>>334268
> Liberals don't have shorter gestation or larger litter sizes, nor do they invest less in each of their offspring.
I'm not saying it's true or not, I don't know. But if the races vary, even in gestation, and even r-selected humans are more K than almost any other species, then I bet there are variances between liberals and conservatives. Which one, for instance, is more likely to spend more time interacting with kids and teaching them?
f11be1 No.334793
>>334268
Good point. But allot of the other features are observable in populations living in a glut. It could be that humans express this response differently, or that the jew media and modern society in general has corrupted the response.
>>334275
Eh, it is unproven but it is an interesting theory.
eb0e5a No.335019
>>334731
>Which one, for instance, is more likely to spend more time interacting with kids and teaching them?
Probably the parents who buy parenting books and read parenting magazines, i.e., liberal parents. Which is the other problem with this theory–it implies that SWPL liberal parents should be pumping out kids and leaving them to more or less fend for themselves, and that's almost the exact opposite of how they behave. Small families, exceptionally high parental investment.
>>334793
>But allot of the other features are observable in populations living in a glut.
Meaningless piffle. Lots of features of both r- and K-selected species are visible in times of resource abundance and scarcity both, because lots of species have r-selected mating strategies, lots of species have K-selected mating strategies, and there are lots of times when resources are either abundant or scarce. r- vs K-selection as applied to culture wars consists of saying, "hey, liberals are androgynous and have high time preference, like rabbits, therefore liberals are r-selected." First, this ignores the issue of reproductive adaptations, litter size and so on. Second, it conflates the behavior of SWPL ideological liberals with the welfare-receiving Dem-voting mostly black US underclass. The two groups are very different and neither one is a good match for the Stephen Molyneux picture of r/K selection.
19c818 No.335886
>>335019
In the absence of birth control/abortions I'm not sure that would apply. And all the liberal women I knew worked or had others raise their kids, the conservatives I've known usually spent more time with kids. Anecdotal, though.
But I agree that applying it to politics/culture is usually a case of calling things you don't like r-/things you like K-. Comparing liberals and conservatives of different races is much less clear then between the races themselves.