>>335938
>>335939
>There have been several cases of people shooting swat officers during no knock raids and getting away with
There have been a very lucky few, that doesn't mean the same outcome in every case, or even in most cases.
>you are actually legally justified to fight back in that situation
This means nothing, plenty of people have shot or killed police in self-defense only to be convicted. It depends entirely on the judge.
Even if you do make it past the "self-defense" gauntlet, you have to make it past the "premeditated" gauntlet, where the State is going to claim you knew in advance and where readily waiting to kill sworn LEO for the sake of killing them.
>unless you live in a statist hell like NY/CA where you'd be prosecuted anyway
The OP was referencing an event that occurred in Fresno.
>>335937
Then you must be the niggest nig in all niggerdom.
>>335943
>What if the cops just paid some gangbangers to do the dirty job in exchange of some goodies from the evidenve box (drugs, money, guns, etc.)?
It wouldn't even have to be that, if it's known bangers or even someone they use as a CI, all they have to do is promise protection.
>If they're crooked cops, I don't think they have any qualms to ask some favors to the local gang.
It's Cali, there is a good chance some of the cops are gang members.