>>25000
>When I see them glorifying colonialism, it's more like a "haha we won" type of deal. As in, it makes sense to want to avoid having this happen to you.
The current migrant situation doesn't mirror European colonialism in my opinion. Firstly, Native Americans were not simply overwhelmed by waves of white people. Even with guns (which Indians later adopted) that would have been nearly impossible, because the Americas housed 1/3rd of the world population and was across the Atlantic ocean. Over 90% of Native Americans were killed by plagues before white settlers had significant presence, and even then it took centuries to expand West. There is no equivalent depopulation bomb to eradicate white people for foreigners to take over. Even with white fertility rates dropping, the same thing is happening in developing countries as their living standards rise - not even considering their high death rates. In East Asia, depopulation has been even more rapid, even if population momentum means it isn't immediately obvious. Some right-wingers take these trends and extrapolate them to extreme levels that border on fallacious, like assuming a birth rate will continue to fall for 100s of years without picking up at any point.
Many of these countries that right-wingers fear will "take over" have populations that are less than half of England, Germany, Australia or the USA. Mexico, for example, has 122 million people, around 10-20% of these people are white. Compare this to the USA, which has 318 million people. Even if every single Mexican immigrated to America in a day they wouldn't be a majority, not to mention their fetility rates are falling. The Muslim population of the USA is like 1%. Australians like to complain about the Lebansese "taking over" a country with a mere 4 million people, roughly 40% of which are Christian. Syria has 22 million people compared to England having 64 million and Germany having 80 million. Lumping in the "Middle East" as an entire race, which is questionable, it adds up to a mere 127 million people. That's multiple countries that add up to about the same as Japan. Even then, non-whites aren't all united like conservatives portray it. Arabs and Kurds often don't get along, and Chinese/Japanese/Koreans have gripes that go far back. Compare this to the incredibly friendly relationships that most Western Euro and Anglosphere states have, even ones with old historical rivalries like England and France. The concept of whiteness itself is basically a trans-continental European identity that other races simpy do not have any equivalent for, except arguably the Jews. Black Africans, by and large, see "African Americans" as dark-skinned Americans, not fellow brothers in a diasporia. Chinese people from Malaysia, Singapore and Hong Kong often enthusiastically express their dislike of mainlanders.
>Only, it's not just terrorism that's the problem. Second-generation Muslim immigrants, feeling ostracised, are responsible for quite a few other problems. The rape epidemic in Sweden
The rape epidemic in Sweden is very overstated. I'm not saying rape isn't a problem in Muslim communities, it is, and IMO immigrants with violently misogynistic or homophobic views should be rejected. However, Sweden has an ultra-feminist definition of "rape". Look at what they tried to pull on Assange, you basically need a written contract to have sex without a condom in Sweden or it can be called sexual assault. Not only that, but Sweden counts multiple events of rape over a period as separate charges. If a woman comes to the cops and says she's been raped by her husband multiple times, they usually attempt to make a record of every single instance. I'd also bet willingness to report (and sometimes lie) about rape would be much higher in Sweden than say, a country like Japan, which might have an officially lower rate of rape, but probably doesn't in reality.