>>316
I don't buy into the genetic nationalism argument. My girlfriend isn't white and she is very much westernized. Non-white women who have sex with white men are more loyal to western civilization in my experience than white liberal women who have sex with white liberal cuck bfs (and cheat on him with Chad and maybe even Tyrone and Badr on the side). My girlfriend's mom doesn't like that she dates white guys. But she eventually got used to it.
She and her husband immigrated from a brown-majority country to a white-majority country. They knew the risks going in. If you don't want your daughter to sleep with white men, don't immigrate to a white-majority country. If my girlfriend's mom eventually learned to live with it. Then surely Muslims should eventually learn to live with the fact that their daughter wants to have sex with western infidels. Instead of forcing her to cover up, not drink alcohol, pray 5 times a day, go to a mosque regularly and forcing her to not have premarital sex.
But you see, it's not as simple as telling religious Muslims "if you don't like it here, LEAVE." No you see religious Muslims are here because they want to impose Sharia Law on us. They want to establish a Caliphate in the west. They are consciously aggressing against us.
I am also pretty sure that I'm not pure-white. Given the migration history of my parents' country and some of the swarthy phenotypes that I have seen in my family tree. I bet if I did an ancestral DNA test, I'd find that I have some North African DNA. Because the Muslims occupied the region. And then when the Christian Knights won, they were forced to convert to Christianity. Maybe even a remote chance of Jewish DNA or maybe even an outside chance of Sub-Saharan African DNA. But I prefer to live in the west and I prefer western values. I don't want to live under Sharia Law and a Caliphate.
At the end of the day people migrate, mix races and cultures change. But unlike the cultural relativist cuck liberals who think western civilization bad, eastern civilization good, I see western civilization as superior to Islam. There are some aspects of eastern philosophies (like Buddhism) that I like. But Muslims are barbarians. I know people in my personal life who were raised as Muslim but are pretty much just Muslim in name only. They are secular/nominal. Just like the vast majority of Christians in the west today are secular/nominal. And that's it. My beef is with Muslims who want to impose their morality on our society. I also dislike Christian conservatives who wish to impose their morality on society. But liberals hate on them 24/7 anyway (while defending and praising Islam constantly) and they are a shrinking minority. They are not a concern.
You see modern liberalism is not about preserving civil liberties. And it's certainly not about advocating for the working-class, let alone promoting the idea that the ownership of the means of production should go to the workers. It's about a rejection of western civilization. It's about promoting the destruction of western civilization. Modern liberalism at the core is hatred of white heterosexual masculinity. And the bottom line is that if leftism wants to win back the working-class white heterosexual man, they need to stop being so actively hostile towards white heterosexual men.
Also, maybe you already know this, but if you look at photos of Afghanis and Iranians in the 1960s and 1970s, their style of dress and the environment looked indistinguishable from the United States. Meanwhile at present day, Afghanis and Iranians have regressed as a people. Their countries are backwater shitholes. So you can't say that it's about genetics.
Post last edited at