ITT: We post results of political orientation tests we took and recommend new/good ones and discuss the results. I will start with a good old 8values test.
Pretty close to reality I must say.
Shit, I thought I was more authoritarian.
This is why I hate that test.
Somebody actually managed to score in the red? Man, you must have to make up all kinds of answers to get there.
I am not a red I am not a red I AM NOT A RED FUCK OFF REEEEEEEEEEEEE
Fine, that's more like it.
Not really, I usually end up in lower red. If you’re kid is screeching in the middle of wal Mart, you need to spank that little shit.
The dialectic is truly in motion.
I get that sometimes on the test also
>that third test
Oh god, kill me. Also, something something NazBol gang.
>Obama listed far-left
You want to know how to determine that a chart is bullshit?
>tfw you're a generic lib
I've been teetering on the edge of falling into full leftism for a while after the online """SCEPTIC""" community became more blatant in their racism and general ideology
Don't bother making fun of me for being centrist, I don't actually care about politics, I'm just looking around here and I like going through tests
You are red friend. Just embrace it.
I used to be a monarchist too. Read Marxist literature. It will redpill you truly. It will open your eyes… and de-spook you. You don't need to go full reeeeing left-winger instantly and hate on what you used to love all of a sudden. Just respect it as a part of your history and don't be sad aobout it or look back in nostalgia. It's time to move on Anon. It's time.
not really sure what my result means
Nah I was just playin' with the words , still I don't really embrace any of your guys views , I am a clerical fascist .
Plus it sounds strange to say "de-spook" when you are a Christ Com don't you think ?
It is not a sentiment of nostalgia , it is a national duty entrusted by God in his creation to defend what is utmost holy and defend our nation from any foreign threat .
>Plus it sounds strange to say "de-spook" when you are a Christ Com don't you think ?
Lel, yeah it is. They are not exactly known for their ideological consistency.
>a national duty entrusted by God
Huh. You would have thought that the bourgeois revolutionary assembly that created the nation would have included God's input in the minutes of the meeting at which He sanctified their creation.
>and defend our nation from any foreign threat
It's a bit odd that He would encourage you to defend your newly-created nation against guys from all those other nations that He created before. It's also odd that He would give them the same order that He gave to you, to defend their nations against all other nations. It's almost as if He is setting you all up to fight with one another over absolutely nothing. You don't think He'd do that, do you, not even as a joke?
none / my own.
2nd pic is what I would like if I were on the influence of state tho. Economically socialist I fucked up and ended mixed but I meant socialist there.
You should take in consideration that you are viewing what I said in it's non-methaphorical way .
The "national duty entrusted by God" is a reference to an Epic wrote by one of our famous poets that talked about how every citizen ( the ones in my country ) had a duty entrusted by God to spread our faith and protect our country .
If you want to take it in the most welcomed intrepretation between our circles it goes a bit to say how we were given the tool and spirit to be able to defend our nation , family and religion whenever is needed , and it is our duty to do it too .
The foreign threat must not be interpreted as something like another nation and it's people but an ideology, something like communism a stateless enemy .
Every nation had/has their own wars , the thing is that it is not God that creates them but the Human essence , the liberty that he gave to us is used for decisions like war , it is sad that we have to fight yet something must be done to protect those who can not be protected .
>You should take in consideration that you are viewing what I said in it's non-methaphorical way .
Of course. The joke is that there is no real component to it.
>The foreign threat must not be interpreted as something like another nation and it's people but an ideology, something like communism a stateless enemy .
A vague and faceless enemy is always the easiest to hate. Unfortunately, every real enemy that must die, every real threat, has a face.
>the thing is that it is not God that creates them but the Human essence
How convenient. God tells everyone from every nation to protect themselves from one another and then absolves himself of all responsibility when they inevitably fight.
Yet again this goes to the fact that I an Idealist is trying to talk with a materialist .
The enemy has a face from time to time , the bolsheviks , CNT , Spartacists , etc , you can not kill an ideology but you can kill those that live by it.
The "protection" is against the sins that can include violence , he is not to blame for our sins , we are human , our creator gave us the liberty for such .
He is not worth your time brother, neither time nor knoweledge, you should get back to our board…
>Yet again this goes to the fact that I an Idealist is trying to talk with a materialist.
So true. It's honestly surprising to see an ancap who knows what that means. Usually they want to play at being the scientific ones.
>The enemy has a face from time to time
The enemy always has a face, because the enemy is always real people. The only time that an enemy can not have a face is when you are talking about theory.
>our creator gave us the liberty for such.
While supposedly knowing precisely what we would do with them. Whether or not He approves in theory, his actions support the quite predictable present reality.
political orientation tests are shit
I am not an Ancap , I just used the wrong flag .
The enemy might not always have a face yet you do have representations of it .
And I don't get your last point .
Never taken this quiz before but I guess its accurate.
>I am not an Ancap , I just used the wrong flag
Ah, that explains it. Damn, for a second I thought that an ancap had actually read more than sci-fi novels and self-help books.
>And I don't get your last point
It is a point about culpability. Whatever He may approve or disaprove of in principle, His actions predetermined a particular outcome that He undoubtedly expected. The men whom you would blame for wars are not independent actors in this scenario. Rather they are predictable creations.
He expected us to sin that is true after what happened in the Edens Garden , yet he also expected us to not sin , even if it is a very small amount of people . Through good works and faith alongside a self-sacrifice for a life fighting for Christendom we shall have our salvation .
If we believe the bible, God literally created mankind knowing Adam would sin and humans would always fail to live up to his commandments and that he would be constantly enraged by the beings that he himself tailormade. He knew even that I would be writing this now at this exact second as he was creating humans. The only possibilities are A: god is somehow both omnipotent and incompetent, he failed to create a being to live up to what he wanted despite perfect power and knowledge, or B: god is a sadist who loves to punish people and he made humans the way they are on purpose just so he would have an excuse to be angry. Either way why worship him?
Why would he be enraged over us ? God is not a person that "gets mad" neither he wants us to suffer .
Yet at the same time to give such a powerfull quality as the one "to be happy" must precede one where the existance of true liberty in form of free will .
"the free will of man, moved and excited by God, can by its consent co-operate with God, Who excites and invites its action; and that it can thereby dispose and prepare itself to obtain the grace of justification. The will can resist grace if it chooses. It is not like a lifeless thing, which remains purely passive. Weakened and diminished by Adam's fall, free will is yet not destroyed in the race (Sess. VI, cap. i and v)."
As much as I hate to use the word "dualism" in this concept it is what it is . To achieve true faith in the creator sin must exist , Aquinas wrote extensively about this .
No god does not want us to sin neither should we but it is something that the free will of man allows for , only then can the opposite exist .
Because if you don't worship him, he'll torture you forever.
Why do I think there is a bunch of liberals here. I've probably misinterpreted some questions.
What is the last pic political test from?
It pisses me off when it's unclear whether the questions are meant to be about an ideal scenario or in the present context.
What even is this bullshit with political coordinates btw?
>communitarian vs liberal
>Why would he be enraged over us ?
Because He is a jealous god, a wrathful god, a vengeful god.
Those are all qualities that do not apply to the Res divina .
"Divine law?" Do you worship Judge Dredd?
Divine Substance … It is from Descartes
On my phone right now.
I answered it as it was pertaining to me and my beliefs and I got Stalin.
Answered according to what Peter would be (bourgeois,sit and wait) and got him.
I guess Ancom with tankie characteristics it is.
Bangon sa pagkakabusabos!
Bangon mga bihag ng gutom!
Katwiran ay bulkang sasabog
buong lakas na dadagungong!
Gapos ng kahapo'y lagutin!
Tayong api ay magbalikwas!
Tayo ngayo'y inaalipin
subalit atin ang bukas!
Ito ang huling paglalaban, magkaisa nang masaklaw ng internasyunal ang sangkatauhan!
Wala tayong maasahang bathala o manunubos!
Kaya't ang ating kaligtasa'y nasa ating pagkilos!
Manggagawa bawiin ang yaman!
Ang maso ay ating hawakan,
Ito ang huling paglalaban, magkaisa nang masaklaw ng internasyunal ang sangkatauhan!
LIBERALS GET OF MY BOARD
Hello there, fellow communists! Please share all you are planning to do with me! We fight for the prol scum, right?
Equality, justice and humanity.
Damn I uploaded the uncut screenshot… please don't gulag me for being a phone fag I am on way home from work.
You are but little babies, watch this.
You are like a little reformist watch this
I got anarcha-feminism apparently.
Who knew that markets are the opposite of "equality"? I just want to reap the fruits of my own labour, such idealogical liberal garbage this is.
This doesn't even differentiate if you think cooperatives aren't socialist or whether you think the state should own the means of production or whether mutualism is preferable. Not even one question on capital, not even one on unearned income or so much as capital gains tax. But there's several variations of questions on minor shit like drug policy (at least 2 on this, victimless crimes and should drugs be decriminalised), same sex marriage, two questions on religion where one answer infers the other.
It's pretty much "HURR you no like corporations or want high tax? You communist nao", I also like that the liberal who made this is so spooked that he puts the topic of the "diplomatic" axis as of equal weight to the economic one.
This one is much more nuanced but could still do with some improvement.
Great. I went from being just a left nationalist to ML by spending my time here instead of trolling on halfchan. God damn it.
What test is this?
Vote 1. You can download the app for free. Pretty neat test I have to admit. Also comes with a gallery of quotes and basic informations on ideologies.
>Green Social Democrat
Whoever made this has no idea about German politics.
Now that's what I call podracing
>tfw you are a hardcore centrist
Did you think that you were a right "anarchist?"
>el peor comunismo
Question about that test.
Would a guild consisting of cooperatives and self-employed workers be public sector or private sector?
Würde mich überraschen wenn die Macher dieses Tests Deutsche wären.
But at least it gives (you) fairly accurate results.
Centrists are just edgy liberals. Get over it capitalist pig.
>Would a guild consisting of cooperatives and self-employed workers be public sector or private sector?
in this test at least, labour unions run the planet and cooperatives are worker owned.
Sadly this test is very limited, like going beyond a exchange value to allocated resources directly, abolish private property …etc
Private sector…why did you even need to ask this? You do know that cooperatives exist right now in capitalist economies, they're not theoretical and they aren't socialist before you ask as they operate using capitalist principles.
BRB I'm going to my local food coop and stay beyond opening hours because it's public property.
I'm pretty sure Marx hypothesised that private property would no longer be sustainable ie be rendered obsolete in the face of capitalist economic upheaval and that welfare merely prolonged the capitalist system.
>Is this feminazi?
No that's just autism.
Gb2 leftypol you faggot
Hm, I thought the anarchy was just some in-between-phase?
Just go back to tumblr
God is omnipotent yet he could not create a world where we are free AND free from sin? So much for omnipotence. He created man as a weak creature full of cravings for temptation and with urges to commit actions: how is this freedom? If it was he would have created us cold and omniscentt, ready to commit godly sins, not blind sins of lust and vengeance, which are the opposite of freedom. What would you prefer, a friend who stops you from doing a wrong act, or a judge that observes you, knows what he could do but does nothing and later punishes you? Behind the facade of "freedom" as always lies the implicit message of abandonment and subjugation: god could "save" us in any moment from fear, suffering, death, ignorance and even sin, but he decides to not do so, and what greater sin than to torture and abandon those who are weaker than you? It's pure evil
fake n' gay
this is very accurate, tbh
>things exist, therefore ideas don't even have RELATIVE meaning to humans
I was a teenager too once. Shit thread btw.