/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

They're all mostly men, male genocide now!

THEY WERE RUSSIAN

Most of the time these people see a German name and assume it's jewish because they're dense as shit.

All I see are capitalist propaganda pushers

>>2873307

>95% of the bolshevik government were jewish

nigger fuck right off.

With regards to the above image, yeh there are probably jews in the media. So what, there are also large amounts of whites in the media, more so than blacks.

What you are pulling is SJW shit "why is x group more/less represented in x industry" well nigger, the answer is capitalism.

In the case of jews, it is specifically their position in history as the sneaky ones who got kicked out that put them in this position.

muh good christian kings wanted ways around the fact they wanted to be usurers but the bible wouldnt let them, so they had jews do the dirty work for them, jews being in banking a lot is the result.

However, there are also chinese, japense, krygytani, mestizo and lots and lots of white bankers.

The problem is banks, which exist independently of race, the problem is the media, which exists independently of race.

You have to be a special kind of autistic retard to think the connection is anything but a historical left over.

are whites banned from being in media? No. Have they ever been? No.

shitposts go in /leftytrash/

>non mode of production

What does he mean by this?

>>2872055

Sounds like a good thing.

>>2871950

>Even here and in the other board most of you faggots are nothing but quasi-reformed /pol/yps who can't spend 5 minutes without arguing about whether or not you should kill all trannies/blacks/browns because for some retarded reason or another you cannot fathom existing at the same time or place than someone who is vaguely different than you. Hell there's even a chunk of you who won't believe anything about climate change until you're dying from heatstroke, freezing to death, starving or drowned within a decade or two

Newfag detected. /leftpol/ has been colonized by reactionaries for months at this point (and they were there from the start if we're being honest, pretty much outnumbering those with actual grievances with BO policy before long), and you seem to have a really hard time distinguishing between people who are actually from /pol/ baiting and who is a leftist, so you're either fucking disabled or disingenuous. All in all, go kill yourself blackpilled faggot, sage for solopsistic defeatism thread.

>>2871986

>>2871972

>>2872014

>>2872055

Ignore this poster, they're the same reactionary who posts this shit in all the other threads and are constantly ban evading. If you see someone bring up climate change when it's not relevant, or see someone mention Al Gore or other denialist talking points, chances are it's this retard.

>>2872714

Yes I can elaborate on that. The early Roman empire (pre 200) took the spoils of the places it conquered and used it for their own sake. They adopted knowledge from Greeks and appropriated a lot of culture into their dominant structure.

I believe the religious conflicts that took place within cities such as for example Alexandria (Christians and Jews) in late antiquity give a good idea when a certain religion can't take over another. The plus side of culture is that it's very flexible and open to appropriate or change for better (or worse). But religion doesn't have this bend, I think mistakes of past will be repeated when culture started mattering less and religion more in society.

The reason I said life is quite good right now is that I was comparing it to 19th century. Which was a very patriarchal society, women needed to marry to even stand a chance if they didn't they were screwed. Their only chance at upward mobility was somehow marrying upward. That's ignoring the order in society which was ruled by nobility in early modernity (pre 1800's) and later by powerful merchants. The common pleb was working an agricultural shitjob, certainly they weren't artisans. The living conditions usually meant clamping multiple families into a single house. Sometimes they were housed under the roof of a boss they worked for.

If you compare modern standards to 19th century or even early 20th century I feel like we're much further as a society. Though it's mostly attributable due to increased efficiency of agricultural production (-> high urbanization in west), increased efficiency of processes and construction, improved transportation of products and increased efficiency in gathering resources.

Our technological ability will keep improving especially in the data age where journals and knowledge is so accessible compared to the past. Sure the capitalist system is sick, but almost any sick system can survive when there has been a constant stream of improvements to life from the technological side. It's certainly keeping people comfortable.

>>2872929

>I knew an elderly couple from Iran who both just so happened to be communists whipped to death by the regime

Yeah dude my dad is the president of north Korea and he said he doesn't like them and hopes Trump will bomb them too

>>2872992

Whiter than you

>>2872996

Even if the anon is lying the purging of communists is a well documented fact m8

>>2872830

>geopolitics is like, a meme, maaaayne

>>2872929

US intervention won't stop the mass killing of communists.

>>2872087

>but it won't probably be as bad as 2008.

what indicates this from that article?

>>2871101

What’s the landlord crisis.

>>2872125

when the mortgage on the value of the house (or as it's london, the flats) is greater than the market value of the house, the lending bank doesn't have adequate security for their loan. Raising systemic risk.

If this happens on a large scale it could cause a price shock as lenders don't want to lend now on an asset that is likely to fall in value, so no-one'll buy the house at a value high enough for the landlord to pay off the mortgage without the landlord having to find money from elsewhere.

>>2872125

No only this; >>2872151 but in short back in like 2013 landlords got load of mortgage deductions on their taxes which were lifted in 2016 but wasn't clocked by the industry. So now their incomes are drastically dropping and they will want to sell-off en-masse.

>>2873096

Oak trees are sacred to Slavic pagans and they will use this fire as an excuse to defile sacred Slavic forests.

>>2873066

Because they are literally not thicc enough. You need big massive fuck-off trees that were either natural ones that had stood for 100s of years, or were grown in specific forests for the purposes of large architecture and later ship building. The reason they don't exist anymore is that the need for them in architecture faded in the renaissance (as architecture moved towards geometrical support as opposed to pure mechanical support) and ship-making was moved to the Americas (the forrests beyond the King George line were in-part kept Native American because they wanted to stop settled farming the land because the wood was used for ship masts).

>>2873096

Oak is one of the strongest woods known to man, they might use redwood but that would still come from NA. So yeah, the trees are likely to come from North America, if it was Quebec it would be pretty fitting tbh.

>>2871333

b-but it's the protestors who are violent!

>>2871894

>"I'm tired of this," a clothing shop owner in the Marais

lol fucking die

>>2872838

tl dt: In protests this week, you had people saying stuff along the lines of: "cops don't kill yourselves, join us!" and then a few said "cops kill yourselves!"

Guess which one of the slogan the MSM reported on?

Has it ever occured to most people that, in terms of politics, even the oldest modern recognizably socialist writers and thinkers are basically hot off the presses? The earth is still reeling from the decision that maybe we shouldn't have single absolute monarchs in control of society.

>>2871567

>Yet there never was a successful state out of any of this. Why?

Byzantines did it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealots_of_Thessalonica

Based Romans.

>>2871572

>feudalism is socialism if the lords give some food to the peasants

Unironically read Kropotkins Mutual Aid: a factor in evolution. Google “folkmote”

I think socialism is a consequence of technologies developed in the early modern era.

As a child, you are taught that the middle ages were ruled by kings and queens. The fact of the matter is the centralised state had very little control over its territory. Local warlords (aka knights) had more influence than kings and queens.

It was only with the development of communication and navigation technologies in the early modern era could the centralised state emerge with control over its territories. So rulers from far away could subjugate others. Prior to then, the only way your family could be subjugated is by your local warlord.

When early socialists like the Levellers and Diggers emerged, distant rulers had subjugated them. So in their mind, the structure of the state could be:

1. Subjugation to a distant ruler

Distant rulers had pushed their limits with the masses, so they were unpopular.

2. Subjugation to a local warlord

Unlike the middle ages, there were no local warlords. Distant rulers, using new technologies, had eliminated local warlords.

3. Subjugation to no ruler

…and thus socialism was born.

In the middle ages, the options were 2 and 3. So why did 3 never happen in the middle ages?

It comes back to the distant ruler eliminating all local warlords. Let's say you kill your local warlord. The neighbouring warlord then fills the power vacuum. The first time there are no warlords, or neighbouring warlords to fill the power vacuum, was when the centralised state developed the technologies to eliminate them.

>>2873108

Expected to get something like this. I wouldn't know how I could prove I'm not FBi but I'm not.

>>2873120

Dude, it's just a really small student paper and I'm writing a small article for it (1000-1500 words). It couldn't even be called a 'study'.

I will not publish any information about you if you don't want me to. You can just send an alias and how you came to know the site.

Alt right groups hate you all the same FBI, but they are way more likely to smoke your kids since not all FBI agents are white. Why don't you do something about them?

dacht het niet vriend

Made the NEP.

managed to control the Bolshevik party and navigate ideological disputes without bloody purges and show trials

>>2872645

Without him their would be no USSR. Without the USSR humanity would’ve never gone to space.

Based and redpilled

My hero.

>is voting for anything worth it?

No. Shit thread.

>Are single issue parties ever worth voting for?

No.

>Are they worth joining to influence their policy on other areas?

Possibly. Depends on how big they are.

>>2871261

Somehow, I imagine him still using a CRT and floppy disks.

>>2871175

>Let’s say in the future that all the rare earth minerals are used up and thus there are no computers in which to organize the economy. Does the socialist calculation debate thus prove that without computers a planned socialist economy is not feasiable

if there's no more computers, the porkies won't be able to use them either, leading to a drastic decrease in efficiency of capital as well. It would be back to Stalin-era USSR vs Great Depression USA. The calculation debate would be moot.

>>2782209

someone explain the joke..?

>>2867671

I don't know myself, bumping to get answers.

>>2870701

Say it with me.

Liberals get the bullet first.

anyone have full body pics of steph?

>>2872845

Find a clip from a live show. They're all up on stage

>>2872845

jimmy gets to titfuck stef every night…hawt dam. mamy gib milkies

>>2872983

The internet!

Although, who knows if there are any Finns here beside you. After all there are only 20 people in Finland, and 5 tourists from Russia or Sweden.

Correct, the structure of a party (the way it is organized) is important for its integrity. This is why a party like Labour (despite its flaws) is different from, say, the DNC or the SPD.

>>2872957

But labour is still highly NGO-ized and undemocratic though. The "lower" spheres such as local branches and constituencies, take orders from the MPS and national.

Issues like open selection of MPS, which means that it would be mandatory for MPs to be confirmed by a vote each time by there local parties, are highly popular with the so-called grassroots, but so far have failed to become policy.

>>2872963

Like I said, Labour isn't perfect and still suffers from "NGO-ization" but it has actual potential and has managed to drop the Third Way, while the leadership of most European social democratic parties are still compromised.

>>2872968

what's the third way and how does it relate to internal democracy in the party?

Is the anfem flag retarde new or is it just another swedish socdem incel persona?

>>2863103

Should we just kill all trans people like Hitler did with the jooz

>>2865236

back to the trash thread you degenerate

>>2870166

You can't fathom how a word means something different than what it literally says? Better get checked for autism. Could help explain why you never get laid. Don't worry, there's therapy for it. Things will get better!

>>2870159

>are only physiologically capable of being aroused by alpha chads

Interesting take but it isn't that bad. Women aren't physiologically incapable of being aroused by femboys, they just prefer chads. Also they end up hooking up with them because they're more assertive.

They do hate themselves for getting involved with shitbags though. 100% true.

>>2872986

>degenerate

back to /pol/