/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Give cyclical to the Zizek vs Peterson thread, plox. Almost reached limit and its only starting now.

Can we have some kind of clown flag?

as a Struggalo, i

>>2865778

The only ones I would recommend are The Nature of the Operations of Modern Armies by Vladimir Triandafillov, and also The Evolution of Operational Art by Georgii Isserson

>>518058

Is the IRC supposed to be dead? Both #leftypol and #bunkerchan are dead; the former empty and the latter unconnectable.

Ask a question

Go to sli.do

Code: debate

>>2867918

Always gets me

>>2867540

Thank god I never got into the twisted clown shit when I was a teen. Listening to that acid bath album was just about the most of it.

>woah, childhood thing does inhumane acts, inst that fuxin twiztid?

what does it mean when commercials adopt leftist rhetoric?

https://youtu.be/XG0ojYuxByw

>>2867906

It means capitalism capitalizes on everything.

HEY HWITE MAN

WATCHA DOIN'?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/college-professor-bought-ticket-rome-st-patricks-cathedral/story?id=62499117

>>2867920

he seems happy

>>2867407

Ask them about Syria or Libya and watch the "peace & love" turn into exceptions.

>>2867407

>Most liberals I've met in real life, not faceless liberal socks on Twitter, think war is stupid and a rich man's game.

This is kind of my experience, but the older liberals I've noticed are really gullible. I was able to convince them otherwise, but my aunt actually thought Venezuela was some socialist dictatorship for a while.

>>2867733

Too many old obama ppl are falling in line with Buttigieg now, they'll split the DNC vote

>>2867884

And Beto, and Harris, and Brooker, and Klobacahar, ect

It's just a repeat of what happened in the last Republican primary.

>>2867773

Agreed. Usually she's not my cup of tea but drinking on the overground is relatable.

>>2867821

I suppose she could read a book but its a sunny good Friday so I don't think she will lose any votes over this. Maybe the muslims but the blacks and the hipsters won't care.

>>2867821

opiods

>>2867765

Hol' up, drinking is illegal on the tube?

The fuck?

>>2867873

Yeah, TFL only. You're good literally everywhere else in the country. Got told to knock it off by the BTP when I was down there and was like u wot m8?

>>2867873

National rail you're good but when it's more local stuff it can be a problem. You're usually fine though as long as you're not being "rowdy" or whatever.

>>2867715

I agree, but the poster was specifically saying that the next economic boom under capitalism will be built on nuclear. It can't, though, unless capital cedes power generation to the central planners and gives up trying to commodity electricity (which it wont do lol)

>>2867582

Social ecology is dead

I am also a Deep ecologist and I've read all the book in Bookchin's reading list.

A lot of it can be useful.

Except that part about cities and using technology for good

>>2867602

why not do finance or computer science?

lots of cash there

>>2867823

>finance

Risky to major in this. Definitely a "who you know" industry. Would make a decent minor though.

>computer science

Solid major, provided you're willing to move where jobs are available.

>>2867564

I think the wordfilter is still hilarious fam, people that don't are prob new

>>2867532

hi recent convert

>>2867555

>I'd dispute this tbh, most nations in the Imperial Core have been transitioning away from Social Democracy for decades at this point. I agree with you on the whole though, thought policing isn't something we should be striving for

while this might be true I wouldn't say austerity would make a country not succdem.

>Not sure I'd say that progressive liberals are the problem, but yeah there is definitely a massive contingent of "Left Liberals" who are a big issue, particularly in US & UK.

they absolute are a problem capitalism is THE problem but between the two capitalist parties int he US the liberal are more harmful to leftism than conservatives

>Most of the people I see advocating for it are at best Radlibs who are merely appropriating the aesthetics of Socialism & Anarchism. This is a more general problem outside of just this issue. I would suggest listening to the podcast it's basically all about critiquing this concept that the "Left" supports.

While I do agree this gets into the "no true scotsman" territory

>I agree that freeing labour power to be exploited between borders is a problem when it doesn't come with an exhaustive opposition to Imperialism for pretty much everyone. The core issue here is the underlying conditions that create the problem in the first place, whereby these nations are imperialized and their profits are extracted without going back into the nation to develop, leaving a massive dearth of opporunities for the working class there, at which point, it's not really a choice to immigrate if possible in the same way that wage labour itself isn't a choice

While first and foremost the problem these nations have is imperialism, transporting the people to the west is not a solution in fact it makes the situation worse.

The people coming in are either good the for country or bad.

If they are good then it is just a continuation of imperialism robbing the third world of their best and brigPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2867505

>Open borders in almost every situation is a bad idea.

Maybe in socialism, but in global communism it really doesn't matter. Mass immigration occurs almost entirely for economic reason. If everyone has everything they need in the area they live in, there isn't a very big reason to immigrate en mass.

>>2867551

IQ levels generally rise as conditions are improved because of the "softening"/elimination of poverty/intelligence traps (i.e. Malnourished uneducated children who didn't receive proper nutrition and are exposed to materials which may negatively alter or affect their growth or genetics grow up and have children who then also lack nutrition and education on top of their now inherited gene mutations. Then repeat.)

One such example of environmental mutations mutations that occur from smoking/being in a smoking environment https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130701135550.htm

Rupert Murdoch is one, he funds a ton of nefarious shit like Tucker Carlson's show. You also have the Koch brothers, Bushes, Clintons, Trumps… probably even Soros since he at least funded the color revolutions. I guess you can also consider the Bilderberg meeting attendees.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation purports to be philanthropy, yet it manages to increase the Gates's wealth instead of giving it away (because it's actually an investment management firm used to find exploitable third world opportunities).

>exploitation as an immorality

>source in how people who make their income through parasitism are parasites

Retard

not gonna happen, doesn't matter either way, pence is worse, revolution now, etc etc

>>2867887

I'm not interested in arguing with you /pol/ incel cross power. have fun ranting about how chad is fucking all the women.

>>2867858

>Wow more redpill rhetoric which is bs and unable to be substantiated beyond anecdotal evidence which has nothing to do with any systemic critique of feminism.

See, this is how you spot someone who spends all his time in an echo chamber. Calling something "redpill rhetoric" isn't even an argument. You are just as bad as the idiots on /pol/ who will dismiss liberal ideas with "lol bluepill faggotry". You only think that shit counts as an argument because you are used to only being around people who already agree with you and won't call you out on how blatantly circular this kind of reasoning is.

>>2867862

That's not what that says. It says men are attracted to RECEPTIVE women, which is totally different.

If a woman was receptive towards sexual advances, but also a bitch, I think you'd still see attraction.

>>2867910

>See, this is how you spot someone who spends all his time in an echo chamber. Calling something "redpill rhetoric" isn't even an argument. You are just as bad as the idiots on /pol/ who will dismiss liberal ideas with "lol bluepill faggotry". You only think that shit counts as an argument because you are used to only being around people who already agree with you and won't call you out on how blatantly circular this kind of reasoning is

My argument is that the person is trying to repackage redpill talking points as some sort of nuanced critique of feminism but that this doesn't change the fact what they're saying is bs which has nothing to do with feminism. I'm not even clear on what they're saying. Do they think feminism teaches women that you don't have to care for yourself and are entitled to whatever partner you like? This is just nonsense which can't be substantiated.

>muh competition with Google

Google needs to be nationalized. Building the same infrastructure in parallel to them would be monumentally wasteful.

>Using Google

>Current Year + 2

>>2867487

>What happened is the past doesn't effect what happens now.

t. my scared shitless white spooks.

>>2867589

He didn't say that. He said, that it's completely absurd to think that people are guilty of crimes commited by their ancestors

>>2867573

Honestly go back to /pol/, you're not even good at falseflagging.

>>2867371

Do you have anything more on superprofit theory?

>>2867483

>but he is an egomaniac with some shitty and inconsistent ideological lines

Yep. Sometimes are his takes absolutely cursed.