[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / dempart / jenny / leftpol / magali / mde / mewch / strek ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

A collective of people engaged in pretty much what the name suggests
Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

Tags: leftism (CLICK HERE FOR MORE LEFTIST 8CHAN BOARDS), politics, activism, news

File: 480dbb0f6d174fd⋯.png (541.09 KB, 415x562, 415:562, 87.png)


OC Thread 3.0

I suppose we should establish a new thread dedicated to /leftypol/ original content.

Feel free to post original content you've made, or OC someone else recently made which you would like to share.

Or, collaborate on improving content within this thread.


File: 9629f35e20a0b89⋯.jpg (34.83 KB, 768x433, 768:433, идите на.jpg)


>Got you in a lie there, you were the first one to mention the word, I was parodying it

No you weren't you were wiggling. You stated that it was the purposeful killing of ukrainians, which would be a genocide, except that it was not and therefore was not.

>James Mace attacked Mark tauger and Wheatcroft while providing no argument aside from a vapid claim that they were not "distinguishing" despite their book being quite clear on that. Mace, like Werth has numerously shown himself to be an anti-communist shill.

> proven that the primary cause of the famine was man made

False, the famine was not man-made because if it were the hunger would have continued into 1935. but it did not, the majority of deaths were during 1933-34 due to incurable (at the time) diseases, rather than food shortages.

>repeating the same bullshit quote.

how lame.

Collectivization had the express purpose of eliminating a social class. Not the individuals belonging to the class but the class and the socio-economic relationships its existence depend on.

Resistance to collectivization (including sabotage), information warfare, poor planning and execution and a severe drought caused mass starvation in large swathes of the USSR, not only in Ukraine. The effects in Ukraine were harsher, however, because Ukraine was the agricultural heart of the USSR and agriculture has traditionally been the most important economic activity in most of Ukraine. Collectivization was not the reason for the famine and was what helped prevent more deaths from occurring. The fact that some places had failures because of mistakes, does not make the collectivization to blame, especially when immediately afterward the USSR did not have another famine until 1946 (caused by WW-2) which broke the almost constant 5 year cycle of famines in Russia over the past millenia.


see pic 1



>If they were more cooperative

You mean if they broke down and let the capitalist west destroy them?

> they should learn to pay back their debt.

Wasn't their debt, nor was the debt the reason for the embargo.



>If they were more cooperative, trade would have been more viable.

They literally had golden Chervonetz smelted to be used for trade and the west was going through the Great Depression, something an influx of gold could alleviate. But even with such economic problems going on, the west still rejected the use of gold for trade insisting instead on things they already had plenty of from trade with the US.



>CTRL+F [purposeful killing of ukrainians]

Only stated by you in your post.

>False, the famine was not man-made because if it were the hunger would have continued into 1935.


What kind of a stupid logic is that, it's like saying that the massive famines in China didn't happen because they didn't get carried into the , (insert year here).

You have direct evidence of Staljins plan failing one by one and you refuse to admit it.


>This disparity between agricultural goals and actual production grew later in the year. An expected 190 thousand tons of grain were to be exported, but by August 27, 1932, only 20 thousand tons were ready.

>Stalin lowered procurement plan for the Ukrainian SSR by 40 million poods at the end of August 1932

>By October 25, the plan for grain collection was lowered once again

>Nevertheless, collection reached only 39% of the annually planned total.


>On January 2, targets were again lowered to 62.5 million poods. On January 14, the targets were lowered even further to 33.1 million. At the same time, GPU of Ukraine reported hunger and starvation in the Kiev and Vinnytsia oblasts, and began implementing measures to remedy the situation. The total amount of grain collected by February 5 was only 255 million poods (compared to 440 million poods in 1931), while the numbers of "hunger and malnutrition cases" as registered by the GPU of Ukrainian SSR increased every day.

>You mean if they broke down and let the capitalist west destroy them?

I mean, it did, check mate.


Freedom>Totalitarian regimes

>Wasn't their debt, nor was the debt the reason for the embargo.

It was a regime change, that still had the duty to change debts. Just because they changed the systems of governments does not mean that the country came from another dimension.


Yeah, because they moved to something more efficient later on in the 70s.




You're literally arguing this in the OC thread, the least you could have done is make a separate thread for your piss poor arguments.



>Yeah, because they moved to something more efficient later on in the 70s.

What are you even talking about? You were talking about the famine, were you not? The west rejected the use of payment in gold during the depression and during the famine, that is what I'm saying. They said the soviets could only pay in timber, oil, and/or grain.



Was thinking you were talking about the GS in general, my bad.

Well yeah, they wanted to put the Soviets in a bad spot, because you know, not paying the debts you had to the countries you owe and all.

But the US had major fuck ups too:




File: b6660c41f21ea00⋯.jpg (76.25 KB, 623x815, 623:815, wikipedia - instead of a b….jpg)


>Only stated by you in your post.

Your first post >>2755804

>knowingly planing to kill people with your decisions

Same exact shit.

Second post

>>Stole more grain from the people to "suppress Ukrainian nationalism"

>>Causing the birth rate to decrease and infant mortality to increase

Again same shit.


>What kind of a stupid logic is that

Collectivization did not stop and continued to be implimented throughout the 30s and the kolkhoz and Sovkhoz system remained throughout the soviet era, in fact when Gorbachev began dismantling that system in the Perestroika the immediate effect was a massive drop in production and starvation to the point where, during the 90s, cannibalism was pretty common. The ukrainians did not reach cannibalism in 1932, despite having a far poorer starting base

>it did

No it really didn't the blockade was removed after 1934 and the USSR finished industrialization and became a superpower that crushed about 75% of the nazi forces in WW-2 and managed to be on par with the USA for over half a century. It only fell because of what Michael Parenti described in Blackshirts and Reds.

"Capitalism is not just an economic system, but an entire social order. Once it takes hold, it is not voted out of existence by electing socialists or communists. They may occupy office but the wealth of the nation, the basic property relations, organic law, financial system, and debt structure, along with the national media, police power, and state institutions have all been fundamentally restructured.” - Michael Parenti, Blackshirts & Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism, City Light Books, 1997, p. 119.

The fall of communist states was a result of the combination a number of strange, conspiratorial events: the swift resignations by communist officials unaware of the protesters’ generalized and ambiguous demands, the right-wing seizure of power in these countries, the unlikely scenario of capitalist sympathizers (Yeltsin and Gorbachev) leading the Soviet Union and therefore the whole socialist world, and the West’s keen maneuvers at quickly absorbing as much of Eastern Europe into it’s own sphere of influence when it got the chance, such as NATO and the EU.

The USA has no intention to create rivals on the world markets - why would USA want to have the same strong economies around it? - it would strip USA of incomes and influence - USA is interested to make all other countries WEAK and to achieve it through any means, including subversion, inciting ethnic unrest, demonizing, economic wars, sanctions etc.

Moreover As B.F. Skinner stated, "And if planned economies, benevolent dictatorships, perfectionistic societies, and other utopian ventures have failed, we must remember that unplanned, undictated, and unperfected cultures have failed too. A failure is not always a mistake; it may simply be the best one can do under the circumstances. The real mistake is to stop trying. Perhaps we cannot now design a successful culture as a whole, but we can design better practices in a piecemeal fashion."

>It was a regime change, that still had the duty to change debts

It was not a regime change, it was a complete erasure of the entire Russian infrastructure. Not to mention that during the intervention the West pillaged more than enough to cover whatever loans the Russian empire had taken out, loans that belonged to the White Russians who were still an active group with money to boot.

> they moved to something more efficient later on in the 70s




Wow, wikipedia, great source.

>muh debts


>muh gold

Considering how much the USSR poured into trying to help Spanish communists and the republic it was only fair. Not to mention that it denied the fasciist of Franco the gold reserves they needed to actively help the Germans in WW-2 eliminating an axis ally from being capable of fighting properly.


File: 8f78a51d1df1e0b⋯.jpg (80.85 KB, 598x643, 598:643, Hayek on organization and ….jpg)

File: 318c020f72aa476⋯.jpg (50.54 KB, 753x527, 753:527, liberty dzugashvili.jpg)

File: 3c98f6123e7041c⋯.jpg (37.23 KB, 720x540, 4:3, sacred principle of libert….jpg)

File: bcd753ade672316⋯.png (638.78 KB, 1280x1163, 1280:1163, libertarian logic.png)


>Freedom>Totalitarian regimes



>people died because of government choices

Nu uh my soviets didn't do nufin

> The ukrainians did not reach cannibalism in 1932

>Survival was a moral as well as a physical struggle. A woman doctor wrote to a friend in >June 1933 that she had not yet become a cannibal, but was "not sure that I shall not be one by the time my letter reaches you." The good people died first. Those who refused to steal or to prostitute themselves died. Those who gave food to others died. Those who refused to eat corpses died. Those who refused to kill their fellow man died. Parents who resisted cannibalism died before their children did.

>Collectivization did not stop and continued to be implimented throughout the 30s and the kolkhoz and Sovkhoz system remained throughout the soviet era

>It was so good you move the goal ever so lower and lower and lower

Perfect system ain't it.

>It was not a regime change, it was a complete erasure of the entire Russian infrastructure.

By, well, all laws, yes, a regime change.


>The Soviet police will beat you if you don't have a haircut that they don't like




>people died because of government choices

No they died because of a number of factors, including MISTAKES by the government, which is because a government si not an infallible god.

On the topic of debt.

1) All state debts normally disappear after a revolution, because the state that amassed those debts has de facto ceased to exist.

2) The Soviets expressed willingness to pay back at least some of the debts in exchange for a loan to cover the costs of damages inflicted by the imperialist intervention during the Civil War and the granting of diplomatic recognition to the RSFSR. The Entente countries refused.

The Bolsheviks justified their reluctance to repay based (among other things) on the Tsars having secured loans for imperialist purposes (ergo the new anti-imperialist government could hardly be held responsible) and in part on historical precedence, e.g. "Revolutionary France not only tore up the political treaties of the former régime with foreign countries, but also repudiated her national debt. She consented to pay only one-third of that debt, and that from motives of political expediency." (Carr, The Bolshevik Revolution Vol. III, p. 377.)

>Perfect system

Never claimed that

>The Soviet police will beat you if you don't have a haircut that they don't like

never happened

>anecdotal story of 1934 woman who felt like she'd be a cannibal vs actual documented cannibalism in 1921

great evidence.



>t was so good you move the goal ever so lower and lower and lower

The goal was achieved, keep projecting tho.

After WW-1, a foreign backed civil war and then WW-2 (along side petty sabotage and economic western sanctions) the USSR had received more than its own share of devastation. 20+ million deaths in WW-2, at least 10 million during WW-1 and the civil war. Over 1/5 of its land (a land-mass equal to 1/2 of the entire USA) was burnt to the ground, Millions of buildings, thousands of villages and hundreds of towns, ERASED, along with a large portion of industrial factories and other production. Despite this the USSR rose up and outran the USA in almost every aspect despite the USA being nearly untouched by either war and gaining massively in terms of economics.


Raised life expectancy by 65% [1]

Increased Real Income by 370% [2]

Housing, Medicine, Transport and Insurance accounted for only 15% of family spending, compared to 50% in the USA.

Eliminated Homelessness [3]

Housing was provided based on need, with rent making up 2–3% of the family income, compared to 25–30% in the USA

Eliminated Unemployment [4]

Employment was guaranteed, trade unions had the power to veto firings and recall managers and injured workers had job guarantees and sick pay as well as maternity leave. A minimum of 15 days vacation, annually. (Articles 66–70 of the Soviet Constitution of 1977).

Provided Healthcare was a right [5] and about twice as many doctors as the USA;

"Citizens of the USSR have the right to health protection. This right is ensured by free, qualified medical care provided by state health institutions; by extension of the network of therapeutic and health-building institutions; by the development and improvement of safety and hygiene in industry; by carrying out broad prophylactic measures; by measures to improve the environment; by special care for the health of the rising generation, including prohibition of child labour, excluding the work done by children as part of the school curriculum; and by developing research to prevent and reduce the incidence of disease and ensure citizens a long and active life." (Soviet Constitution, 1936)

Achieved Full Literacy [6]

From a starting point of 38% for men and 12% for women. With School Enrollment raised by 460% [7] And secondary education was a right, funded by the government as long as cumulative grades remained at least at a ‘B’ average. [8]

Subsidized Early Childcare [9]

Fees for pre-school needs did not exceed 2–3% of family income. with 50% of urban and 33% of rural children attending, compared to 10% in the USA over-all.

Lastly they eliminated a Wage gap between Men and Women through equity, provided both sexes opportunities to choose from and grow in. [10] This wage gap was real, unlike the one that modern Social Justice Warriors keep screeching about.




"Communism under Stalin has produced the most valiant fighting army in Europe. Communism under Stalin has provided us with examples of patriotism equal to the finest annals of history. Communism under Stalin has won the applause and admiration of all the Western nations. Communism under Stalin has produced the best generals in this war. I was always impressed by Lincoln's answer when Grant was charged with taking too much drink.Persecution of Christianity? Not so. There is no religious persecution. The church doors are open. And there is complete freedom to practice religion, just as there is complete freedom to reject it. Racial persecution? Not at all. Jews live like other men. There are many races in the Soviet Union and not even a color bar. Political purges? Of course. But it is now clear that the men who were shot down would have betrayed Russia to her German enemy." - Opportunity to Win War in 1942; A SECOND FRONT IN EUROPE TO AID RUSSIA By LORD BEAVERBROOK, Britain's Lease-Lend Coordinator in Washington Delivered before the Bureau of Advertising of the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 23, 1942

Before the Revolution, 76% of the people were illiterate, including 88% of the women. Virtually complete illiteracy prevailed among the indigenous populations of Siberia and Soviet Central Asia. Indeed, more than 40 languages had not been reduced to writing at all. Prior to the revolution, only 290,000 Russians possessed any kind of higher education, whereas the 1959 census reported that more than 13 Million citizens had some higher or specialized secondary education, and more than 45 million people had 7-10 years of education….Raising the literacy rate from 24% to 98.5% within the span of a single generation for more than 200 million people would be an achievement in itself if only one language were involved, to say nothing of the severe problems posed by a multilingual society…To detail the massive character of the Soviet educational effort in Central Asia, the Uzbek Republic, which is the most advanced of the Central Asian areas today, as it was in pre-Revolutionary Russia, provides an apt illustration. Before the Revolution, only 2% of the population was literate. There were no native engineers, doctors, or teachers with a higher education. In short, Central Asia was no different in this respect from most of the colonial dependencies of the European powers, and worse off than many.Today, in the Uzbek Republic alone, there are 32 institutions of higher learning, more than 100 technicums, 50 special technical schools, 12 teachers' colleges, and 1400 kindergartens. Nearly 2,500,000 children attend school, and more than 50% of its teachers have had some higher education…The rate of literacy is over 95%. The Republic before the Revolution possessed no public libraries: today there are nearly 5,000. The number of books printed in the Uzbek language in 1913 was 118,000; today it approaches 19 million. When this record is compared with that of Iran, Afghanistan, the Arab countries, the states of Southeast Asia, or even Turkey, all of which were at a comparable or more advanced level of educational attainment in 1914, the achievement is impressive…” - Vernon V. Aspaturian, Modern Political Systems: Europe




The USSR was in desperate condition at the start however it did not resort to the measures used in the West, and still caught up and exceeded it.

"If we are backward and weak, we may be beaten and enslaved. But if we are powerful, people must beware of us. We are 50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries of the West. We must make up this gap in 10 years. Either we do this or they crush us." - Josef Stalin, First Conference of Workers, 1931

And he did it. In time to be ready to defeat Hitler, whom he saw coming. He did it without forcing the country through the worst horrors of the Industrial Revolution in countries that had gone before. We have forgotten them, they did not. One hundred years into the British Industrial Revolution an Act of parliament was passed to reform working conditions for children, the Factory Act. Children, not adults.

These are its provisions:

- no child workers under nine years of age

- employers must have an age certificate for their child workers

- children of 9-13 years to work no more than nine hours a day

- children of 13-18 years to work no more than 12 hours a day

- children are not to work at night

- two hours schooling each day for children

- four factory inspectors appointed to enforce the law

It took many decades, much longer than the period of basic Soviet industrialization, before this became the norm in England, not an aspiration. Children were worked two days straight, and more. In the mines. In the mills. In the fields and factories. Try to imagine what adults had to do.

The first attempt at passing child labour laws in the U.S. was struck down by the Supreme Court. Eventually one was passed in 1938, but basically unenforced, especially in agricultural work. Children in the Soviet Union, from the very beginning, spent their days in school. Family farms, as everywhere, were probably exceptions, but this was the law and it was enforced. There were bureaucratic hoops to jump through to get permission for an exception.

[1] A. Szymanski, On the Uses of Disinformation to Legitimize Revival of the Cold War: Health and the USSR, Science and Society, Winter, 1981.

[2] Corrigan, Philip, Ramsay, Harvie and Sayer, Derek, Bolshevism and the USSR, New Left Review. No. 125. January.February, 1981.

[4] Gregory, Paul R. and Stuart. Robert C., Soviet Economic Structure and Performance, New York: Harper and Row, 1974.

[5] Sivard, Rush Legar, World Military and Social Expenditures. Leeburg, Virginia: WMSE Publications, 1980.

[6] Mickiewicz, Ruth, Handbook of Soviet Social Science Dam New York: Free Press, 1973.

[7] Central Statistical Board of the USSR, The USSR in Figures for 1978, Moscow Statisika Publishers, 1978.

[3,8,9] George. Vic and Manning, Nick, Socialism, Social Welfare and the Soviet Union, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.

[10] St. George, George, Our Soviet Sister, New York: Robert B. Luce, 1973




Now let me explain the situation prior in more detail

95% of the people from Eastern Europe (mostly within the Russian empire) were poor peasant farmers who owned no land but paid high rents to the country's landlords who made up the middle/upper class, they were rich, privileged and had no problems withholding grain-stocks if necessary. Russian peasants lived in villages cut off from the rest of the world. The villages were not much more than a collection of mud huts lining the main road where illiterate peasants worked as indentured servants, farming the land to keep some food on the table and as payment of rent to wealthy landlords. When land grants were made originally, they were huge. The grantee came into possession of a huge chunk of land and whatever was on it, including towns and villages. The people became serfs, including the townspeople. The shopkeeper or blacksmith was a serf and paying rent or labour to a master on the same basis as a peasant serf. He was not free to move, or to go out of business, but he could start another, and occasionally a town serf would prosper. The town serfs were emancipated before the peasants; the peasants were freed in 1860, but on terms that worsened their living standards and security. The state bought 80% of their land from their landlord and sold it to them on a long-term mortgage. Since they considered it theirs already, this was no windfall. Around the middle of the 1800s, the British abandoned protectionist import barriers to grain, the Corn Laws, which gave southern Russia access to an export market. This created an opportunity for southern Russia to export, and they began growing wheat. The serfs who had originally worked half the landlord’s holding for him and half for themselves had often paid cash rent instead of labour and worked the whole holding for themselves. Now there was a new incentive in the mix and landlords reversed the terms. Serfs lost the produce from the extra land but still had to work it. Whatever entries into the cash economy they had contrived such as planting cash crops like flax frequently had to be abandoned. Russian peasants had one other alternative to a miserable life of tenant farming. They could move to the city to find work in one of the many miserable factories that were springing up all over Russia, becoming proletariat. By Russian law workers couldn’t be forced to work more than 11 ½ hours in a day (already a huge amount), but most factory bosses ignored this and the police were easily bribed to look the other way. Wages were very low, a few rubles for a months work. The factories were dirty, dark, and dangerous. Workers were given free housing but the conditions of these barracks were so terrible that they made a New York City tenement from 1890 look like a room at the Ritz. Each room was nothing more than a long, empty warehouse where each family stayed in a room divided by a piece of cloth. Each “room” was only large enough to fit a bunk bed that often touched the one next to it, (compare that to communals that at the least had proper rooms and were in themselves created ONLY because Tsarist Russia did not provide any proper houses for the people). The Russian Empire's peak production levels were in 1913 and the top estimate put it at about 1/5 of America's production prior to WW 1 (and even less as soon as the war began). The majority of these factories used outdated and inferior equipment, the top line new Battle-cruisers and Battleships that were to be the future of the Russian navy had almost all of its systems and products made over-seas because the Russian industry had no ability to provide an alternative. At the end of WW 1 and the civil war, Russia's production levels were about 0 because almost all the factories had been destroyed. The conclusion is obvious, the USSR was a drastic improvement over the Russian empire.




File: 4d773146d9fe278⋯.png (4.43 MB, 2040x1511, 2040:1511, bourgeois_graveyard.png)

Gulag Ben, up and at it again! Now with even more labels!



>never happened

When the Beatles turned famous and people started cutting their hair to look like them the government started a crackdown on people who "Westernized" themselves. And yeah, the Soviets were afraid of a popular band. There's a whole documentary about the youth uprisings who wanted to listen to popular songs, wear popular brands, have popular bands play there but no, only state sponsored songs are allowed.

>No they died because of a number of factors, including MISTAKES by the government, which is because a government si not an infallible god.

So yeah, they died by Soviet incompetence. They would rather use the food they had to export it, rather than feed the Ukrainians. As I've said earlier, they shipped off food to West Germany to make a profit instead of handing it over to their own people, and Ukraine was hit way harder than Russia itself, that could just be see in the Natural change per 1k, in Russia that was -18.8 while in Ukraine it was -47.4.

Also, nice copy pastas.






>this projection

Keep projecting retard

> the government started a crackdown on people who "Westernized" themselves.

Nope, that wasn't it at all, they cracked down on the black-market of western items sold illegally. Nothing to do with haircuts.

>oviets were afraid of a popular band

LOL what, the Soviets didn't ban the Beatles, they banned Rock songs that were vulgar. Not to mention that the USSR and warsaw pact had its own popular bands and musicians

> a whole documentary about the youth uprisings who wanted to listen to popular songs, wear popular brands, have popular bands play there but no, only state sponsored songs are allowed.

1) name it

2) so what there are documentaries about how the holocaust wasn't real, moron.

>They would rather use the food they had to export it

ignoring numbers again

>copy pastas. 90% of what I posted was something I already wrote, the only thing I didn't write was the stuff on debt, that stuff was from /marx/ who were helpful enough to provide an exact set of information, as I did not have any at hand at the time, ignoramus.


File: fcfca81da5cb061⋯.jpg (905.75 KB, 1960x904, 245:113, hib.jpg)


>ignoring numbers again


>exports 1.8 tons of food

>starve your population out and export it to foreign markets instead of feeding it

>result in millions of deaths but its ok because they rejected foreign aid and gave them a small number of reserves

KEYPOINT: They could have fed 5 million people with 1.8 tons of food they had but they chose to export it.

You're so mad you forgot to think

>communism is g-great guise, y-you just n-n-need to try it again

> name it

"How the Beatles Rocked the Kremlin, 2009 documentary by BBC




>They could have fed 5 million people with 1.8 tons of food

Excuse you?



see the last line in



File: 9d3a17b7c0c2102⋯.jpg (207.8 KB, 405x597, 135:199, 2LL7VCJ copy.jpg)

have I done well


File: c6f1e670fd312ce⋯.jpg (76.85 KB, 431x751, 431:751, communismequalsXD.jpg)


>it exists and therefor its mine

>Waah waah why does someone own things

>I want it because I need it therefor it belongs to me


File: 1f4b7b9beca930a⋯.png (101.93 KB, 1278x2407, 1278:2407, Poland leech.png)

File: d0c2f90865a7e7a⋯.png (744.18 KB, 1178x1080, 589:540, poland on WW 2 crimes.png)

File: dfcfef71fc80eee⋯.jpg (283.61 KB, 1268x1600, 317:400, anti capitalist meme.jpg)

File: 69a34ad842ddd39⋯.jpg (78.06 KB, 640x640, 1:1, can't fail without a goal.jpg)


>"How the Beatles Rocked the Kremlin, 2009 documentary by BBC

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA wow that trash is your evidence? LOL, the fact that it't a BBC doc about Russia is a red flag.

>exports 1.8 tons of food

And imports almost as much

>more drivel

>rejected foreign aid

There was no foreign aid, at all. They didn't reject it, they refused to let themselves become


more people in the USA have HIV


you mean the same Poland that got its ass beat again and again? seems like the only place Poland can be great is either as part of the Warsaw Pact or in fiction.

>They could have fed 5 million people with 1.8 tons of food they had but they chose to export it.

Except they imported food and lowered quotas and did a shit ton of relief efforts.

>so mad forgot to think

says the guy repeating the same posts and literally ignoring stated evidence contradicting their points while using ONLy biased sources, and ignoring sources that counter them including Ukrainian ones.

It's interesting how you smear the USSR for 1 crisis when the USA literally had the same thing happen; 7 million estimated deaths due to American Famine during Great Depression except that unlike the USSR, they did't have a blockade on them, and had an established economy. Yet the US government is not blamed





File: 660d8570a6c80e8⋯.png (398.7 KB, 621x708, 207:236, a social revolution must b….png)


*they refused to let themselves become vassals of the West. Sorry that they were thinking about trying to promote communism and prevent it from being crushed. Casualties are not exactly unexpected in a revolution and in the prevention of counter-revolutions. The fact that these things occurred is because reality is such that measures must be taken, you, try and balance imports and exports to prevent economic collapse and thus maintain the future for hundreds of millions of people, OR let the future go to naught because in the futile attempt to save each and every individual during a time of hardship for EVERYONE is ridiculous.


File: 64198f72ce72cbb⋯.png (678.2 KB, 1533x1016, 1533:1016, ClipboardImage.png)


>M-muh exports


"The 1932 grain procurement quota, and the amount of grain actually collected, were both much smaller than those of any other year in the 1930s. The Central Committee lowered the planned procurement quota in a 6 May 1932 decree, which also permitted kolkhoz and peasant trade in grain at free market prices. To encourage increase production, this decree reduced grain procurement quotas for kolkhozy and edinolichniki from the 1931 quota of 22.4 million tons to 18.1 million tons; in partial compensation it raised the sovkhoz quota from 1.7 million tons to 2.5 million tons, for a total procurement quota of 20.6 million tons. Since the preliminary plan composed by the trade commissariat in December 1931 had set grain procurements at 29.5 million tons, the 6 MAY law actually reduced the procurement plan 30 percent. Subsequent decrees also reduced procurement quotas for most other agricultural products.

These decisions were a major policy shift from the preceeding years' attempt to eliminate market forces from the Soviet economy. After the May 1932 decree, Soviet leaders were optimistic that trade by kolkhozy and individual peasants would become as important for urban food supplies as procurements."

"They did try to alleviate the famine. A 25 February 1933 Central Committee decree allotted seed loans of 320,000 tons to Ukraine and 240,000 tons to the northern Caucasus, Seed loans were also made to the Lower Volga and may have been made to other regions as well. Kul'chyts'kyy cites Ukrainian party archives showing that total aid to Ukraine by April 1933 actually exceeded 560,000 tons, including more than 80,000 tons of food. Aid to Ukraine alone was 60 percent greater than the amount exported during the same period. Total aid to famine regions was more than double exports for the first half of 1933. It appeas to have been another consequence of the low 1932 harvest that more aid was not provided: After the low 1931, and 1934, and 1936 harvests procured grain was transferred back to peasants at the expense of exports."

"The harvest decline also decreased the regime's reserves of grain export. This drop in reserves began with the dought-reduced 1931 harvest and subsequent procurements, which procured grain to those areas in 1932. The low 1931 harvest and reallocations of grain to famine areas forced the regime to curtain grain exports from 5.2 million tons in 1931 to 1.73 million in 1932; they declined to 1.68 million in 1933. Grain exported in 1932 and 1933 could have fed many people and reduced the famine: The 354,000 tons exported in the first half of 1933, for example, could have provided nearly 2 million people with daily rations of 1 kilogram for six months. Yet these exports were less than half of the 750,000 tons exported in the first half of 1932. How Soviet leaders calculated the relative costs of lower exports and lower domestic food supplies remains uncertain, but available evidence indicates that further reductions or cessation of Soviet exports could have had serious consequences. Grain prices fell in world markets and turned the terms of trade against the Soviet Union in the early 1930s, its indebtedness rose and its potential ability to pay declined, causing western bankers and officials to consider seizure of Soviet property abroad and denial of future credits in case of Soviet default. Failure to export thus would have threatened the fulfillment of its industrialization plans and, according to some observers, the stability of the regime."




>the same thing happen in the USA

In the USA this was prettily labelled 'defarming' but the tyrant is still Stalin.

Between 1928-1934 in the USA, over 80% of farming lands were destroyed, 7 million people in agricultural states died of hunger. Can this be called de-Kulakization and Holodomor (many farmers were thrown off their lands by banks)



>Castro has 900 million

This myth is baseless and believed by morons.

>Kill more communists than Pinochet

Lel, counter-revolutionaries are now communists.

>Che was racist and homophobic

False, Che's anti-negro statements are from his diary when he was an edgy right-wing teenager (just like /pol/), he later changed his views and stated as much. He was not against gay people he was against idpol faggotry.

>hipsters are socialist


try harder /pol/


File: e9f02eb029002f8⋯.png (104 KB, 600x600, 1:1, alunya thumbs up.png)


Yep. I'd make it neater in formating of the text but otherwise it's spot on.



>And imports almost as much

>not displaying the numbers

>using much as a term to describe numerical data

>170k+ later on 325 tons do not equal anything near 1.8m

>still ignoring the fact that they shipped off 1.8m tons of food that could have been used to help the people

>There was no foreign aid, at all.

Yeah, because the state has underplayed the famine and denying any form of foreign aid, because they loved their people so much.

>more people in the USA have HIV

Per capita, not really, and you know, the US has a bigger population size.

>54 Russia 5.89 per 1,000 people

>69 United States 3.27 per 1,000 people

>says the guy repeating the same posts and literally ignoring stated evidence contradicting their points while using ONLy biased sources, and ignoring sources that counter them including Ukrainian ones.

>posting comments from biased scholars, self proclaimed Staljinists



Grover Furr

>post opinions on academics with bad methodologies




"Historian James Mace wrote that Tauger's argument "is not taken seriously by either Russians or Ukrainians who have studied the topic." David Marples, professor of history at the University of Alberta, was critical of Tauger's claims, stating: "Dr. Tauger and other scholars fail to distinguish between shortages, droughts and outright famine. There is no such thing as a 'natural' famine, no matter the size of the harvest. A famine requires some form of state or human input." Tauger's evidence, methodologies and conclusions in regard to the famine were criticized by Robert Davies and Stephen Wheatcroft in their book The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture, 1931–33, published in 2004."

>Posting moonrunes.ru


Example, above

Oh golly gee

>7 million estimated deaths due to American Famine during Great Depression except that unlike the USSR

>Seven and a half million people does not mean the number of particular victims of the famine, but a general demographic loss, or the difference between the supposed population on the date of the census that was due to be held in 1940 and the factual number of people.

>BTFO'd by your own source


>Pravda (an old propaganda outlet)

>rt (seriously)


>1930 Census: 122,775,046 population

Seven million missing where?

>1940 Census: 132,164,569 population.

>“Population health did not decline and indeed generally improved during the 4 years of the Great Depression, 1930–1933, with mortality decreasing for almost all ages, and life expectancy increasing by several years in males, females, whites, and nonwhites. For most age groups, mortality tended to peak during years of strong economic expansion (such as 1923, 1926, 1929, and 1936–1937). In contrast, the recessions of 1921, 1930–1933, and 1938 coincided with declines in mortality and gains in life expectancy. The only exception was suicide mortality which increased during the Great Depression, but accounted for less than 2% of deaths. “



>This myth is baseless and believed by morons.

Forbes estimate, which is, much better than you.

>Lel, counter-revolutionaries are now communists.

>Everyone Staljin killed deserved to die

>False, Che's anti-negro statements are from his diary when he was an edgy right-wing teenager (

>Nu-uh, it's fake because he wrote those statements when he was younger

top lel


>False, Che's anti-negro statements are from his diary when he was an edgy right-wing teenager (



File: 713bb26f1474736⋯.png (158.23 KB, 701x632, 701:632, iYiFi.png)


Forgot to add the picture





>>not displaying the numbers

already did.

>170k+ later on 325 tons do not equal anything near 1.8m

Wow you're a piece of work. already covered this horse-shit before, here is more on it: >>2757077

>because the state has underplayed the famine

False, I already posted numerous quotes citing the fact that Soviet leadership was not immediately aware of the issues until things were already rolling.

>denying any form of foreign aid


>they loved their people so much

Let's see, get food and be a slave of Western capitalists for the rest of your life and your children's lives, or fight and survive to rise up and oppose them… HMMMMM?

>the US has a bigger population size.

The USSR and USA had a comparable population size in 1990. During that time HIV was far more prevalent in the USA, this became more problematic after the USSR fell and capitalism came, and all the degenerate shit that came with it.

>posting comments from biased scholars

Tauger is not biased nor Wheatcroft, and I dare you to prove that Ukrainian Nationalists are somehow pro-communist. Your Mace quote was not an argument just a nit-pick on numbers being assigned to different things, not that the numbers were wrong. Furr not withstanding, most of my dozen+ sources are not biased. All of yours are either Ukrainian nationalist drivel or MI-6 drivel.

> moonrunes

Google translate, not to mention that the site has primary sourcing and is actually an argument. Your argument is nothing more than Ad hominum.

>BTFO'd by your own source

No not really, I stated that the USA did similar things and that 7 million people died, despite this no-one is accusing the USA of intentionally murdering them. That was my argument.

>RT, Pravda, Infowars

Not an argument, you're attacking the source, not the content, which uses primary sources, twat.

>Seven million missing where?

10 years is plenty of time for birth rates to rise again. the famine lasted 3 years AT MOST, and the numbers lost were recovered quickly and over-shot by a large margin in the USSR, the same can be assumed in the USA.

>Forbes estimate

Forbes is a capitalist shill source caught lying numerous time.

>it's fake

Never said that twat

>everyone stalin killed

<muh gorillions



And? That's irrelevant. the USA was an established industrial power, the USSR was not, it was recovering from devastating WW1 and Intervention and was rapidly industrializing, yet despite that, unlike the USA:





Something you conveniently ignored, bitch.


File: 63e79a25222c3ec⋯.png (491.82 KB, 1600x2951, 1600:2951, ClipboardImage.png)

File: f405405dd0eb4eb⋯.png (2.87 MB, 2000x1320, 50:33, ClipboardImage.png)

File: e2a9af030192a1a⋯.png (6.81 MB, 2267x8334, 2267:8334, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 3574728dda266db⋯.png (1.12 MB, 800x2449, 800:2449, ClipboardImage.png)


Here, a simplified, infograph post, for your illiterate arse.


File: 38447864f3687ca⋯.jpg (52.17 KB, 451x677, 451:677, nuuh.jpg)


>muh jpgs

top lel

Wanna check if your grandpa is on the list?




>Ukrainian Canadian farmers offered to send aid to help the starving victims of the Holodomor, but this assistance was refused by Soviet authorities, said the keynote speaker at the Holodomor commemoration organized by the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, Edmonton Branchat City Hall, Nov. 23.

>“During 1932-1933 more pressure from the West could certainly have been applied on the Soviet regime on the matter of the famine. A major problem, though, was that the Soviet regime was denying that there was a famine,” said Dr. Serge Cipko, Coordinator of the Ukrainian Diaspora Studies Initiative at the Kule Ukrainian Canadian Studies Centre, Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies at the University of Alberta.



>In the Soviet Union, authorities all but banned discussion of the famine, and Ukrainian historian Stanislav Kulchytsky stated the Soviet government ordered him to falsify his findings and depict the famine as an unavoidable natural disaster, to absolve the Communist Party and uphold the legacy of Stalin


Levy, Clifford (15 March 2009). "A New View of a Famine That Killed Millions"


File: 9cfedf0b13ac8dc⋯.jpg (25.07 KB, 450x450, 1:1, ты охуел.jpg)


>I was refering to Furr

I know, and I mentioned specifically that MOST of my sources are unbiased. which is why your harping on Furr is pointless as his stuff makes up ZERO of my anti-holodomor argument and only is part of my mini-post on Katyn, twat.

>You don't even know how to read

The pot calling the kettle black

>No, they didn't.

They did, based on the same methodology used to calculate your Ukrainian famine numbers. Your chart ONLY references CITIES, when most people did not live in cities at the time.

>Accusing the other side of using and ad hom, while using an ad hom

1) Still haven't adressed the fact that you're still using it.

2) That wasn't ad hominum, that's pointing out facts. Your sources are ukrainian nationalists and anti-communists like Mace.

>literally unsupported by data

sure bud, sure

>we can see a massive drop in Ukrainian birth rates

false equivalency

>stay mad

pot calling the kettle black

> enjoy your bubble of ignorance

Man you really are an iron pot, that's how thick you are



No refutation. It's a summary because you don't read written sources.


And what about it? the fuck is that supposed to prove? that people were arrested? no-one denies that, doesn't make them wrong

>I'll be off now

Good, stay out, ignoramus, you've brought nothing new and only proven once more that /pol/ dogmatism is thicker and denser than the Earth's crust



>Ukrainian Canadian farmers offered to send aid to help the starving victims of the Holodomor, but this assistance was refused by Soviet authorities, said the keynote speaker at the Holodomor commemoration organized by the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, Edmonton Branchat City Hall, Nov. 23.

The Ukrainian Canadian COngress is made up of people descended from the OUN UPA, saved by the CIA from being executed for being nazi collaborationists whose crimes were comparable to those of groups like Dirlewanger, a fact that they were aware of when they rescued them. Their words are unreliable and anecdotal

>authorities all but banned discussion of the famine


>Stanislav Kulchytsky

An obscure ukrainian nationalist who heroizes Stepan Bandera, (calling him a hero) and who like the rest of your posts is both biased and has no concrete evidence.


from a New York Times article… Wow it's like you're trying to prove that you're retarded.

Literally every single one of your sources has been covered either in my posts or my sources, which you have ignored wholly.

Here is 1 of those sources, which covers literally the entire thing: https://www.garethjones.org/tottlefraud.pdf

ANd that's ignoring the rest of them yet you keep repeating your Mace quote and out-of-context stats along with Ukie nationalist drivel, like a broken record.



>The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture

You understand the conclusion they come to in this book is that the famine was not created on purpose and that the Soviets did not intentionally starve the Ukrainians, right? They do argue mismanagement during the start of the crisis, yes, but that of overestimation by the Soviets in regards to harvest and, most importantly, confusion in regards to what to do in response to the natural disasters and agricultural disruption which had drastically lowered those harvests and forced them into rationing the now insufficient quantities to those groups which were deemed absolutely necessary for the economy to run and society to function.

In regards to the natural disaster which caused this all spiral downward, it was unusual environmental conditions in 1932 (quoting here) "in which extremely wet and humid weather gave rise to severe plant disease infestations, especially rust. Ukraine had double or triple the normal rainfall in 1932. Both the weather conditions and the rust spread from Eastern Europe, as plant pathologists at the time documented. Soviet plant pathologists in particular estimated that rust and other fungal diseases reduced the potential harvest in 1932 by almost nine million tons, which is the largest documented harvest loss from any single cause in Soviet history." You can read about this, I can post the pdf's if you want.

Honestly, why is nobody addressing the main source he's using? It doesn't argue what he thinks it does.



>why is nobody addressing the main source he's using

His main source is Ukrainian nationalist stuff actually, he brought up Mace later.

I had sources on Mace's bullshit but my old laptop crashed last year so I lost most of my sources.

(PS do not bump thread until retard leaves)


File: 4fe11cc53e18469⋯.jpg (25.48 KB, 348x417, 116:139, 7831bbc3ceba258925f669d94b….jpg)


I saw that pic somewhere.

>The ukrainians did not reach cannibalism in 1932

Reach, but only coz culaks resist collectivization and literally hoard and rot groin and spread anti soviet propaganda.

>Resistance to collectivization (including sabotage)

You cant imagine how strong classcuck ideas in Ukraine.


>On the topic of debt.

In fact almost all Russian empire debts leak into bourgeois pockets. Why soviet peoples shod pay that debts?

>from a New York Times article


Conclusion : Its a pity but Soros propaganda work wery well in Ukraine.


File: 7eba8a9bc341790⋯.png (3.42 KB, 225x225, 1:1, Civiele.png)

Ignore the ukronazi and post OC as usual.


>>2757215 (me)

To add to this, not only does The Years of Hunger not argue that the famine was intentional or that the soviets intentionally starved the Ukrainians, but none of the works by those who attempted to take an unbiased look at the famine argue this either. At the very worst the information shows panic and confusion, not intentional starvation.



By posting this you deny yourself the right to call anyone's sources biased. Conquest is famously biased and has been know to fudge numbers and information especially in regards to military doctrine, kill counts, and total force numbers. If using Furr is unacceptable, using Conquest is admitting complete ignorance of history. No established historian views his as reputable.

>Stephen Bandera

Come on now, this is blatantly poor sourcing. You're sourcing a literal Ukrainian nationalist you has no evidence for his accusations on his part.


File: 62144d368c73407⋯.jpg (295.39 KB, 1280x904, 160:113, 1515416476061.jpg)


>don't burst my b-bubble n-nazi



>While the Soviet government admitted that some peasantry died, it also sought to launch a disinformation campaign, in February 1983, to blame drought. The head of the directorate for relations with foreign countries for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), A. Merkulov, charged Leonid Kravchuk, the chief ideologue for the Communist Party in Ukraine, with finding rainfall evidence for the Great famine. This new evidence was to be sent to the Novosti press centers in the U.S. and Canada, denouncing the "antidemocratic base of the Ukrainian bourgeois Nationalists, the collaboration of the Banderists and the Hitlerite Fascists during the Second World War." Kravchuk's inquiry into the rainfalls for the 1932-1933 period found that they were within normal parameters. Nevertheless, the official position regarding drought did not change.



>Foreign relief rejected by the State. Respectively 176,200 and 325,000 tons of grains provided by the State as food and seed aids between February and July 1933.

>Export 1.8 million, give them half

What a deal.

Source: Davies, Robert W.; Wheatcroft, Stephen G. (2010). The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture 1931–1933.


>You're sourcing a literal Ukrainian nationalist

Nu uh, don't use Ukrainian sources, use Official Soviet statements that were sugar coated under heavy damage control

Sure thing fam


File: 33d7986882a131d⋯.jpg (141.7 KB, 481x500, 481:500, hahaha.jpg)


>use Official Soviet statements that were sugar coated under heavy damage control

Nope not what I said.

>don't burst bubble

Look who's talking

>repeating same quote despite being debunked by over a dozen posts with sources and plenty of stats.



/pol/ confirmed for brainlets yet again.


File: 0b0753c185f6056⋯.jpg (63 KB, 860x484, 215:121, per-1.jpg)

Resolution of the SNK of the USSR of 1933 "On the resettlement to Ukraine of 21,000 families of collective farmers"



Yes and?


just interesting



>Again using Years of Hunger as a source for proving intentional starvation

Can you actually read it before attempting to source it?

>use Official Soviet statements that were sugar coated under heavy damage control

I'm unironically using The Years of Hunger, the same source you're quoting. Actually read it.


can i somehow improve visibility here? It's really hard to read but conversation is interesting




See >>2757077



File: 7c4c7395c217b66⋯.pdf (5.17 MB, The-Years-of-Hunger-Soviet….pdf)


>Export 1.8 m tons of food that could have been used to feed them, five million people for one year

We explained the gold blockade, to which you said they should pay back their debts regardless, even if its with resources. So what is it? What should they do? They also need to industrialize, something doubly proven true by the events that occurred in the years that followed. In addition, by the actions taken no famine ever occurred again. You also assume they did not send relief, which they did when information actually was revived by the Bureau https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMBJ_nQ4sTA.

Again, you're argument is intentional starvation, something The Years of Hunger, which is goes into depth in its research and is far from Pro-Soviet, refutes. Here is the pdf if you haven't read it.



*was received by the Bureau


File: 9cfc2eaca55bd39⋯.png (54.49 KB, 500x521, 500:521, fucking dumb as a jellyfis….png)


>Note the abuses of the Soviets towards the people

anecdotes by ukrainian nationalists

>prove wrong in detail

Spamming the same quote and ukrainian nationalist anecdotes is not detail. Not to mention cherry-picked statistics and contextless statements that show your ignorance, even of your own sources

I'm sorry I called you an ignoramus, that's an insult to the ignoramuses of the world to be associated with a dense twat like you.


File: f3ec07023947428⋯.jpg (19.14 KB, 336x355, 336:355, banana.jpg)


"Our study of the famine has led us to very different conclusions from

Dr Conquest’s. He holds that Stalin ‘wanted a famine’,142 that ‘the

Soviets did not want the famine to be coped with successfully’,143 and

that the Ukrainian famine was ‘deliberately inflicted for its own

sake’.144 This leads him to the sweeping conclusion: ‘The main lesson

seems to be that the Communist ideology provided the motivation for

an unprecedented massacre of men, women and children.’145

We do not at all absolve Stalin from responsibility for the famine.

His policies towards the peasants were ruthless and brutal. But the

story which has emerged in this book is of a Soviet leadership which

was struggling with a famine crisis which had been caused partly by

their wrongheaded policies, but was unexpected and undesirable. The

background to the famine is not simply that Soviet agricultural policies

were derived from Bolshevik ideology, though ideology played its

part. They were also shaped by the Russian pre-revolutionary past,

the experiences of the civil war, the international situation, the intransigeant

circumstances of geography and the weather, and the modus

operandi of the Soviet system as it was established under Stalin. They

were formulated by men with little formal education and limited

knowledge of agriculture. Above all, they were a consequence of the

decision to industrialise this peasant country at breakneck speed."

TBH I agree with this, but still the objective point stands, they traded grain for money, instead of giving it to their own population. Also, in the video tell OP to talk about them bragging about sending grain to Hamburg while Ukrainian villagers starved.


Or you could, you know, accept that it was a regime change and negotiate on how to pay back the debt like a normal country?


>anecdotes by ukrainian nationalists

>Snyder and Ellman

Sure thing, do you have anything to prove them wrong or is anything that does not fit your world view AN EBIL NAZI



>but still the objective point stands, they traded grain for money, instead of giving it to their own population.

They traded grain for farming and industrial equipment mostly. Straight money transactions were usually not done.

>Or you could, you know, accept that it was a regime change and negotiate on how to pay back the debt like a normal country?

But the point is that the western counties did not accept them as legitimate despite negotiations. That's the whole point of the gold blockade. Despite having the gold to pay the western countries, nearly every Western country refused to accept the gold chevonetz, primarily because it would legitimize the USSR internationally, instead demanding grain, oil, and/or timber (usually a mix of all three). They literally would not accept anything else.



>Snyder and Ellman

Unsourced anecdotes by them as well, not to mention that Snyder was debunked. dismissed.

>the objective point stands, they traded grain for money, instead of giving it to their own population

They did, but the famine was not the biggest problem at the time, and if they failed to export and buy necessary stuff the country would collapse, the famine would grow into the 10s of millions in casualties, the people would be vassals to western imperialists and all that would be achieved would be MAYBE the feeding of a few million people in the short run, at the cost of dooming them ALL in the long run. That's what life is about, making hard choices. Hindsight is 20/20

>hem bragging about sending grain to Hamburg while Ukrainian villagers starved.

Didn't happen.

>accept that it was a regime change and negotiate on how to pay back the debt like a normal country?

I repeat

1) All state debts normally disappear after a revolution, because the state that amassed those debts has de facto ceased to exist.

2) The Soviets expressed willingness to pay back at least some of the debts in exchange for a loan to cover the costs of damages inflicted by the imperialist intervention during the Civil War and the granting of diplomatic recognition to the RSFSR. The Entente countries refused.

The Bolsheviks justified their reluctance to repay based (among other things) on the Tsars having secured loans for imperialist purposes (ergo the new anti-imperialist government could hardly be held responsible) and in part on historical precedence, e.g. "Revolutionary France not only tore up the political treaties of the former régime with foreign countries, but also repudiated her national debt. She consented to pay only one-third of that debt, and that from motives of political expediency." (Carr, The Bolshevik Revolution Vol. III, p. 377.)

>do you have anything to prove them wrong

Yes, the sources I posted and which you did not read. Even Furr's BLood Lies is a source that ought to be read because no-one has actually debunked that book, only complained about biases, factually it blows Snyder's trash out of the water.



>lost the elections and took power

Wow you're ignorant, I'm not going to waste re-inventing the wheel, here, read:

Despite Kerensky being a member of the Social Revolutionary party, traditionally based on the peasants, they did not enact a single word of the SR’s policy on land reform. They could not even convene a constituent assembly to write a democratic constitution, for fear not being able to control such a body. Step-by-step, mass support was moving to the Bolsheviks who called for a break with capitalism and all power to the Soviets.

The ruling class, the landlords and capitalists, could no longer rely on parliamentary maneuvers to maintain their power. All their parties had been rejected by the people. They instead moved to the methods of a fascist coup led by General Kornilov in August of 1917. Kornilov was not just going to massacre the Soviet workers, he would also have broken up the Provisional Government. Kerensky, rightfully fearing for his own head, released Bolshevik prisoners who in turn defeated Kornilov’s coup by mobilising the Petrograd workers and conducting agitation amongst the troops.

From that point onwards the ‘liberal, reformist’ Provisional Government was suspended in mid-air. The mass of workers and peasants looked to the Soviets to solve their problems. The bosses, landowners, and monarchists looked to Kornilovite reaction to teach the people a bloody lesson for being so impudent. The ‘middle-road’ had been tried and rejected by all sides. The only options were socialism or fascism.

But didn’t the Bolsheviks lose the vote for the constituent assembly? It is true that after almost a year of the liberals and reformists refusing to call the constituent assembly that it was actually the Bolshevik-led Soviets that organized this election. The results were 41 percent for the SRs, 24 percent Bolshevik, under-5 percent Kadet, and 3 percent Menshevik. It is notable to compare the vote of the Bolsheviks with the Kadets, the party siding with Kornilov’s generals and the White reaction. The Bolsheviks also gained decisive majorities in the urban centres and two-thirds of the vote amongst the soldiers of the western front.

Unfortunately, the split between the left-SRs, who supported Soviet power, and the right SRs had not been formalized at the time of the assembly elections. Therefore, the right SRs were significantly overrepresented in the party lists and the peasants were not given a genuine choice. The countryside voted SR while all the active sectors of society had moved far past the stage of arms-length parliamentarianism as seen in the imperialist countries. The Soviet system, where elections are direct, delegates are recallable, and there is no division between legislative and executive (i.e., every delegate has a job to do), is far more democratic than the parliamentary system where unaccountable MPs abandon their constituents for years at a time while raking in huge salaries.

When the constituent assembly met on 18 January 1918 it was a sickly hybrid anomaly. The reformists attempted to organize a demonstration in support but few attended. Delegates brought candles and sandwiches in case the power was cut off. At 4am the head of the guard, an anarchist, said, “The guard is tired. I propose that you close the meeting and let everybody go home”. And that was the end of the assembly that nobody was willing to fight for. It was not democratic enough for the workers, who looked to soviet democracy, and too democratic for the capitalist generals, who were preparing to launch the civil war to re-install some form of autocracy.



>What exactly did you debunk, except the imaginary stuff in your head?

I'd ask you that.


I was talking more specifically about Furr. Ellman's sources are more researched than Snyders but her has an anti-soviet bias, Furr a pro-soviet one. Furr however also provides context that Ellman does not. And Snyder is just trash, you'd do better citing fucking Conquest.

>Ellman didn't.

HAHAHAHA, yep, sure.

>1.8 sold, taken from from Ukraine that could have been used to feed them

And imported plenty plus the use of reserve stocks and other measures see >>2757077

and https://www.garethjones.org/tottlefraud.pdf

>Dr. Bohdan Krawchenko

Another nationalist fuckhead using statistics and claiming they bragged about it with no evidence. Good job.

Also on the topic of what those OUN UPA faggots did:

>Sexual practises


>mass murder


Photos: https://cont.ws/@sam8807/287556


>nazi collaboration and support

http://istmat.info/node/39194 (The memorandum of the OUNb collaboration with the Nazis)

>modern day followers committing war-crimes and justifying it as a war against the Zhids (jews).



File: 08d8effe5c29e30⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 350.88 KB, 650x422, 325:211, ClipboardImage.png)

File: a1379903395b387⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 227.4 KB, 650x460, 65:46, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 7a9fa9f3ff950e6⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 370.83 KB, 650x449, 650:449, ClipboardImage.png)



I forget, you won't visit any of those sites because they would instantly destroy your argument, so here, view these photos. The people whose arguments you are using, are descended from and heroize the people who did this:

One of them, Mykola Lebed was characterized as "a well-known sadist and collaborator of the Germans" by the CIA, according to Swedish-American historian Dr. Per Anders Rudling in his book "The OUN, the UPA and the Holocaust: A Study in the Manufacturing of Historical Myths." However, this fact didn't prevented the CIA from recruiting the former Nazi collaborator and let him reside in Queens, New York, living on the money of US tax-payers.



>Little bit too early

Wow, you are a hypocrite. First you are too obtuse to recognize the contextual information of statistics, now you're being linguistically pedantic.

The description of fascist is befitting Kornilov as his ideology and reactionary behavior is no different to the actions of fascists like Mussolini a decade later.

> justifying an illegal seizure of power

Justify the illegal seizure of power by the people who would form the USA... you're back to being obtuse.

Also, the illegal seizure was conducted by Kerensky who's party overthrew the Tsar and promised the peasants to end the war and help. They failed to do anything however, instead happy to double-deal and carve the country apart as it collapsed, until the people were fed up and supported the Bolsheviks, routing out the liberals and their collapsed government. Also almost nobody died in the seizure of the Winter Palace that swept up the remnants of the Provisional Government during the October Revolution, as opposed to the 1,500+ people who died during the liberal February revolution.



1) The Ural Soviet made this decision independently, and they executed them for treason to the Russian nation, which is true. The actions of the Tsar kept Russia in a semi-feudal state of abject poverty, all while living in leisure.

> piles of bodies that the Soviets left behind

Except the soviets never heroized that, and most people executed by the soviets were tried criminals or took part in counter-revolutionary activities. Mistakes may have been made (no justice system is perfect) but the USSR took responsibility for that. by executing those who abused their power and by saving those who had not perished, and compensating them


File: 15ec5d86b7093dc⋯.png (340.98 KB, 679x605, 679:605, a Japanese supermarket aft….png)


>where did he state anything that was wrong?

>rejecting everything you don't agree with and saying they are nationalists

None of your ukrainian sources have any primary sources to back them up, especially about the supposed behaviour towards people.

>import 500 tons of grain

<Ignores my post and everything else to repeat the same shit




>Lavrentiy Beria

Debunked rubbish, Montefiore is a garbage researcher who's postulations are unsupported by any evidence. The only claim is some memoirs by Khruschev which are unreliable at best. where are the corpses of those women/ why did no one dig them up or look for them when this information was “revealed”? Where are the proofs? Flimsy statements, do not make an argument make.

>you disregarding facts

Yes I mean that YOU disregard facts

>throwing ad homs left and right

Again, that's you. I only state ad hominum at you as a person; you're a twit. However at your argument I point out only facts. Most of your sources are anti-communist, half are made up of pointed Ukrainian nationalists who have no evidence to back them up and have an open agenda against the USSR.

>"American famine" accusation

I didn't make an accusation, I made a comparison and posed the question that judging by this behaviour and information would you say it was an intentional destruction of people, and the answer was no. YOU are making a strawman.

>Mussolini, the young socialist

Calling yourself a socialist does not make you one.

>where did Kornilov declare that he was a fascist

Never stated that, I said quite clearly that while the concept of facism was not in existance at the moment, Kornilov's ideology embodied the same reactionary ideals as fascism. Calling him a fascist is not inaccurate. Does a duck stop being a duck if the word for it didn't exist?

>Different case and context

So now you care about context, LOL

> point still stands

Rigged elections means your point fails. They won most elections that weren't rigged in the right-wing's favor. This is like Hillary supporters thinking she beat Bernie fairly.

>you took out the main opposition





How far right is your Overton Window?

>They do, and I've proved that they do

Nope, you haven't

>same old photoshopped pic


>Ilya Ehrenburg

AHA! I knew you'd pull that out.

Yeah see, the thing is you're posting the German propaganda translations that they made in response to Ehrenburg, which they printed as "proof" of the 'soviet monster'

The full text of one these faked leaflets (which you fail to provide because you don't know shit):

"Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these Germanic women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army."


These words never were written by Ehrenburg. And in his article “Blonde witch” (title hints to Blonde beast = ubermensh) in the Krasnaya Zvezda dated November 25, 1944 Ehrenburg wrote:

"There was a time, when Germans used to fake important documents of state. Now they have fallen so low as to fake my articles. The quotes that German general ascribed to me betrayed their’s author: only the German is able to make up this dirty"


All Ehrenburg tquotes,: https://labas.livejournal.com/706510.html

Also: "We crossed the border of our homeland. I thought that when we get to Germany, I have no one German will be worth of mercy. So much hatred I had accumulated in my heart ! Why should I feel sorry for his child if he killed mine? Why should I feel sorry for his mother, if mine was hung? Why should I not touch their homes if they burned our houses? I wanted to see eyes of their wives, mothers who gave birth to their sons. Would they have the face to look in my eyes without shame? ...When we came up to some settlement, I saw German kids running around – hungry, ragged and miserable. And I, who had before swore to hate all of them, I gathered some food from soldier ration, added several pieces of sugar, then gave it German children… No, I have not forgotten, I remembered everything they did... but I could not look without pity into these hungry children's eyes " [Aleksievich C. The War with unfeminine face. Minsk , 1985 . Pp. 301-302.]

>Anyone opposing the communists, is a criminal according to communists

Anyone opposing capitalists, is a criminal according to capitalists.


>the children

The daughters were adults, the boy was a son. If they survived they were the perfect puppets for the White Army to use as their propaganda tool "the holy heir". Lenin did not plan on executing the Tsar, this was done without his knowledge and done by the independent actions of that soviet. What was done, was done.

>Lenjin got a wide smile




In reality Ilya Ehrenburg was publicly criticized for his violent writings by Georgy Aleksandrov, so he was more of the exception rather than the rule. Also that has nothing to do with the Romanov execution.


File: e61017e06ea93e3⋯.png (1.95 MB, 980x1912, 245:478, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 6741a09af6fe168⋯.png (3.79 MB, 1080x2868, 90:239, ClipboardImage.png)


>Bolsheviks failed because the elections were rigged

Yes, Patrick. YES.

>defending rapists

See pics related, you're a retard

> debunked by who

And we've come full circle, go boil your shirt.




>When Yugoslav politician Milovan Djilas complained about rapes in Yugoslavia, Stalin reportedly stated that he should "understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle."

literally never happened.

>karate arguments and copy pastas again

It's a screenshot of some information and a detailed debunk of the myth, deal with it.

>a quote of a whore means it's ok to rape women

LOL no argument.

Stay mad that your precious uber-mensch weren't raped and that they were defeated by other human beings who didn't do 1/10th of the crimes that they did, and never celebrated any such crimes, but punished them.


>[citation needed]

Literally in the text you illiterate ape.



according to Soviet Criminal Code the Criminal code from 1934 articles 153-154 states:

153. Sexual relations with the application of physical force, threat, fear, or with the use, through deception, of the helpless condition of the victim (rape) – deprivation of liberty for a term up to five years. If the rape has as its consequence the suicide of the victim or was perpetrated on a person, not having attained sexual maturity, or, on a person of mature years, [by? several persons] – deprivation of liberty for a term of up to eight years.

154. Compelling a woman to enter into a sexual relationship or the satisfaction of a sexual desire in another form by a person, on whom the woman is materially dependent, or subordinate at work – deprivation of liberty for a term up to five years.

Orders and Directive in reference to Germany and the policy towards the population: Жизнь моя, иль ты приснилась мне?

According To O.A. Rzhishevsky, President of the Association of Russian WWII Historians, the timeline of anti-looting and rape measures in the Red Army is as follows: дискуссия продолжается

- January 19, 1945 Stalin signs a general directive which forbids harsh treatment of enemy population by the army. It was duplicated by commanders of multiple fronts, for example commander of the 2nd Belarussian Front Rokossovsky issued an order to execute all looters and rapists on sight.

- This was viewed as not enough and in April 1945 a second order was issued. Its addressed exactly at the two fronts that were conducting the Berlin operation:

A Stavka Directive for commanders of troops and members of military councils of the 1st Belarussian and 1st Ukrainian fronts concerning the necessity of a change in the attitude towards German POWs and the civilian population.

April 20th, 1945 г.

ЦАМО РФ. Ф.236. Оп.2712. Д.390. Л.350–351.


Stavka HQ Orders:

1. Demand that [soldiers] change their attitude to both, German POWs and German civilians. Treat Germans better. Hash treatment of Germans only causes fear and makes them resist, rather than surrender. Civilian population, expecting retribution, self-organizes into bands. Such situation is not profitable for us. A more humane treatment of the Germans will make it more easy for us to carry out military operations in their territory and of course lower German resistance.

2. in the areas to the West of Oder, Furstenberg and Niece (to the west) create German administrations, and in the cities - appoint German burgomasters. Do not touch regulars members of NSDAP if they are loyal to the Red Army, capture only leaders if they haven't escaped already.

3. Improving attitude towards the Germans doesn't mean losing vigilance or fraternization with them.

Stavka HQ, J. Stalin, Antonov.

I order:

1. Bring into action the directive no later than 4/21/45, and inform every officer and soldier of existing troops and front organizations.

2. Particular attention is paid to the fact that people do not hit the other extreme and would not allow the facts to mix with familiarity with German prisoners of war and civilians.

3. The Chief of Staff, together with the heads of the political departments of the morning of 23/04/45 are to make frequent checks of knowledge of Comrade Stalin’s instructions of all categories of personnel.

G. Zhukov, Telegin, Malinin




I quite literally have nearly ever single order on the topic of rape quoted somewhere on my hard-drive for this exact bullshit. You have nothing.




When people are saying that not only the Soviets committed rape, they aren't making an apology for rape. They are just stating the reality that every side on the allies and axis committed rape, including Berlin http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2017/05/09/book-review-crimes-unspoken-the-rape-of-german-women-at-the-end-of-the-second-world-war-by-miriam-gebhardt/.



>axis committed rape

On a scale that dwarfed soviet rapes


Given that most of his posts are deleted, can someone tell me if he actually answered the statements here >>2757313 about the grain exports, or did he just ignore all those points and skip right into talking about the Romanovs and the rape of Berlin?



>skip right into talking about the Romanovs and the rape of Berlin?

Essentially. He just went back the beginning about how, if the regime changed, that means that the new regime inherited the debt, and that they should have just paid it off. He's run out of steam and is just posting discount Stormfront shit. Even then I have found Stormfront threads that debunk literally every point he made



Yes, but those rapes committed by the Germans tend to get ignored by people because it was made less "messy" (as in disorganized) and more "efficient" (i.e. Prisoner "brothels", public use lines, sex slavery, etc). Its usually the Japanese who are singled out because their rapes were committed on a large scale during and after the battle and were more "messy", while also retaining sex slaves.



>that means that the new regime inherited the debt, and that they should have just paid it off.

Then I have no idea why he's complaining about exporting grain still given that they could only pay in a mix of grain, oil, and timber at the time. Does that not now justify the export he decries? Is this not self-defeating?



Nice tips


That is what being a /pol/yp is like, regular constant contradictions because their ideology is dichotomous with reality and logic.



Thank you so much anon! I really should do more poses for my tankgirls.



Good to see that you're still alive and posting, I thought shit-storm that just went down with the /pol/yp scared everyone away.


seconding this



>muh aids

you realise HIV/AIDS was nonexistent until capitalism right? nice job inadvertently praising the USSR.



>literally never happened.

Does Djilas, who is himself a writer, not know what human suffering and the human heart are? Can't he understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometers through blood and fire and death has fun with a wench or takes some trifle?

In response to complaints about the rapes and looting committed by the Red Army during the Second World War, as quoted in Conversations with Stalin (1963) by Milovan Djilas, p. 95

>It's a screenshot of some information and a detailed debunk of the myth, deal with it.

Myth about what, you making, premade comments? Golly jee.

>Stay mad that your precious uber-mensch weren't raped

>A documentary book, War's Unwomanly Face by Svetlana Alexievich includes memories by Soviet veterans about their experience in Germany. A member of the Soviet military is quoted as saying:

According to a former army officer:

"We were young, strong, and four years without women. So we tried to catch German women and … Ten men raped one girl. There were not enough women; the entire population run from the Soviet Army. So we had to take young, twelve or thirteen year-old. If she cried, we put something into her mouth. We thought it was fun. Now I can not understand how I did it. A boy from a good family… But that was me.

Svetlana Aleksievich, War’s Unwomanly Face, Moscow : Progress Publishers. 1988

>Geoffrey Roberts writes that the Red Army raped women in every country they passed through, but mostly in Austria and Germany: 70,000–100,000 rapes in Vienna, and "hundreds of thousands" of rapes in Germany. He notes that the German Army probably committed tens of thousands of rapes on the Eastern Front, but that murder was the more typical crime for them.

Roberts, Geoffrey (2013). Victory at Stalingrad: The Battle That Changed History. Routledge. pp. 152–153.


The Bible said,


Therefor no Christian has ever killed.

Checkmate, atheists!

On a side note, the Germans punished people who raped women to, so did the Americans

>130 of the 153 troops disciplined for rape by the Army were African American. Military courts sentenced African American soldiers to more severe punishment than white American soldiers: U.S. forces executed 29 soldiers for rape, 25 of them African American. Many convictions against African Americans were, however, based on flimsy evidence. For example, Marie Lepottevin identified William Downs only because he was "much larger" than the other soldiers, despite the crime taking place in near darkness.

Nig nogs nogging all right


>An type of economic distribution gave me AIDS




File: 23b5ce4c0f9e258⋯.jpg (73.46 KB, 680x490, 68:49, big brain.jpg)


Ten Commandments list

>You shall have no other gods before Me.

>You shall make no idols.

>You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.

>Keep the Sabbath day holy.

>Honor your father and your mother.

>You shall not murder.

>You shall not commit adultery.

>You shall not steal.

>You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

>You shall not covet.

Therefor, no Christian ever made any thefts or murders, or adultery or anything.

> Demand that [soldiers] change their attitude to both, German POWs and German civilians.

> Treat Germans better.



File: 6f64a3ffdc3cb45⋯.png (62.14 KB, 1308x348, 109:29, fake news.PNG)


Fake news

>J. Robert Lilly, Regents professor of sociology and criminology at Northern Kentucky University, reported in Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe in World War II his estimate that 14,000 rapes were committed by U.S. soldiers in France, Germany and the United Kingdom between 1942 and 1945.

>80k to 120k offspring

So they all had quadruple twins?



>>An type of economic distribution gave me AIDS

no. HIV wasn't a thing in the USSR until the Gorbachev era and later on during the 90s when it dissolved.



Because it needed time to get to Russia, since the first case in the US came in the 70s, because it came from Africa in the 60s. And looking at the per capita, Russia is way way worse:

>54 Russia 5.89 per 1,000 people

>69 United States 3.27 per 1,000 people



> And looking at the per capita, Russia is way way worse:

yeah, maybe it has something to do with the drop in living standards and poor healthcare.


File: 856215513f8c51d⋯.mp4 (1.28 MB, 640x360, 16:9, rusir.mp4)


Or the fact that Ruskies want some, cheap drugs and cheap fun

because they are, a cheap people




>Does Djilas, who is himself a writer, not know what human suffering and the human heart are? Can't he understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometers through blood and fire and death has fun with a wench or takes some trifle?

>In response to complaints about the rapes and looting committed by the Red Army during the Second World War, as quoted in Conversations with Stalin (1963) by Milovan Djilas, p. 95

An anecdote that Stalin supposedly said this, no evidence of it however, again.

>Stay mad that your precious uber-mensch weren't raped

Not what I said

>War's Unwomanly Face by Svetlana Alexievich includes memories by Soviet veterans about their experience in Germany. A member of the Soviet military is quoted as saying

Wow, great cherry pick, but see that doesn't support any thesis of encouraged rape, and the fact of the matter is data shows that this was not common. The reason the numbers were sort of high si because its a several MILLION man army entering a country of over 50 million people, meaning that rape occurring is not unlikely, the numbers were low, and perpetrators punished. The Nazis did not do the same with their own when they did that in the USSR.

>Geoffrey Roberts

rubbish fucking writer

>the Germans punished people who raped women to

Nope, the Keitel order of 1941 specifically forbade investigation into rapes and other such behaviour by German troops in Russia




>the USA

they only punished negroes for that and then only rarely.

“After the fighting moved on to German soil there was a good deal of rape by combat troops and those immediately following them. The incidence varied between unit and unit according to the attitude of the commanding officer. In some cases offenders were identified, tried by court martial, and punished. The army legal branch was reticent, but admitted that for brutal or perverted sexual offences against German women, some soldiers had been shot – particularly if they happened to be Negroes. Yet I know for a fact that many women were raped by white Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. In one sector a report went round that a certain very distinguished army commander had made the wisecrack: "Copulation without conversation does not constitute fraternization."

A divisional officer remarked dryly during a discussion of the non-fraternization edict: "This is surely the first in history a serious effort has been made to deny soldiers the use of women in a country they have conquered!"

- Osmar White, By the eyes of a war correspondent

Additionally in my old research I came across the works of the Russian historian Mikhalev. His book Human Losses in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945 A Statistical Investigation, covers the soviet losses in WW 2. The number of military losses were 10.9 million dead soviet troops. Of them 994,300 were those convicted of offences during the course of the war 422,700 were sent to penal battalions, 436,600 imprisoned in Gulag labor camps and 135,000 executed. As the punishment for rape was execution, and since I have heard many wehraboos quora users, WW-2 forum pages and other discussions describe how these rapes happened all the time, I’ve decided to give them the benefit of the doubt and say that all 135,000 executed offenders were rapists…. that STILL is nowhere near 2 million. Even if one were to say that all of these offenders were rapists, (which is factually incorrect considering the documentation), One would still get LESS than 1/2 of the claimed 2 million.


>Therefor no Christian has ever killed

false argument


>fake news


Mind boggling mental gymnastics by a /pol/yp are not unusual.


>russians wanted

Nope, all stats show that Most Russians did not and still do not want capitalism, and those ills of capitalism.

>they're cheap people

that's rich coming from scum like you


Whelp, it's been fun proving /pol/ is dumb again, but I got shit to do. If you want to keep spamming here, be my guest, but I'm done replying. You have nothing.

Oh but before that. Here a final dump

A good addition on a German over-view on the basis of documents and personal experience is the book Die Tötungs- und Vergewaltigungsverbrechen der Roten Armee auf deutschem Boden 1944/45, by German historian Manfred Zeidler, published in Wette/Überschär, Kriegsverbrechen im 20. Jahrhundert, Darmstadt 2001

The following is pages 418 to 432.

Credit to the translation goes to Roberto of forums.axishistory.com

The numerous footnotes were only translated where deemed essential for the understanding of the text or otherwise of particular interest.

Given the length of the essay, I’ll divide the translation into the following parts:

Part 1: The Background / Facts and Figures

Part 2: The Perpetrators / Hatred and Propaganda

Part 3: A Change of Policy


File: 1b7f7f8d54e3008⋯.png (113.56 KB, 599x491, 599:491, proofings.png)




top fucking kek m8

Keep at it

>Mind boggling mental gymnastics by a /pol/yp are not unusual.

>claims an absurd number

>can't back it up

>no u


Also, all your sources don't even mention the word rape, so





Tuck your tail and run commie



Part 1 The Background

"First the other peoples became victims of a war emanating from Germany, before we ourselves became victims of our own war", said Richard von Weizsäcker in his widely noted speech on the 40th anniversary of the war’s end on 8 May 1985, in which he reminded his listeners that the cause for the violence inflicted on the Germans in 1945 and thereafter should be sought not at the end of the war but "at its beginning and at the beginning of the violent regime that led to war." The flame of hatred and violence lit by Not Socialist Germany, especially through its conduct of war and occupation rule in the East, eventually hit Germany and its population and left painful wounds that forged the image held by many Germans of their eastern neighbors, especially Russians and Poles, over a period of decades. Two years after the end of the war, in the spring of 1947, Walter Dirks wrote the following in the ‘Franfurter Hefte’: "Horrible things have happened, especially in the Polish areas, East Prussia and Silesia, torments and rapes such as we wouldn’t have thought possible prior to the experiences of the Hitler era." He herewith addressed a collective trauma that was linked to the end of the war for a long time, especially by the millions of refugees and expellees. In the mid-1950s the Federal Ministry for Expulsion Affairs (Bundesvertriebenenministerium) put together a voluminous documentation in which it tried to reconstruct the chaotic events of the last months of the war on hand of a multitude of eyewitness accounts and thus to save them for the collective memory of the federal German public. Two decades later, in the mid-1970s. it was two Soviet ‘dissidents’ from the war generation, Aleksandr Solzhenizyn and Lev Kopelev, who from their personal experience addressed the sensitive topic of the behavior of their own armed forces in the last months of the war without any cosmetic and thus broke a strong taboo of the official Soviet culture of memory. Kopelev, whose memoirs ‘Chranit vecno’ first appeared in the US and caused a sensation especially among the West German public, wrote: "Was it really necessary and inevitable that our people should become such savages - rape and robbery, did that have to be? […] In the newspapers, in the radio, we called for holy revenge. But what avengers were those, and against whom did they take revenge? Why did so many of our soldiers turn out to be mean bandits, who gang-raped women and girls - on the streets, in the snow, in house entrances; who killed unarmed people, and who destroyed, spoiled, burned down everything they could not carry along? […] Senselessly - out of pure vandalism." Today, more than half a century after the end of the war, after the political turnover in the countries of the former socialist camp and the - albeit still reluctant - farewell to the heroic, idealizing images of history from the Soviet era, they are prepared to approach the historical truth there as well. Thus a Russian author [Marina Klemeseva], in a collection about the history of East Prussia that appeared in 1996 in Kaliningrad, admitted to the following in regard to the conquest of the city by the Red Army in April 1945: "There were cases of robbery, arson, senseless murder and rape of German women. Yet these were expressions of arbitrary abuses by members of the military, expressions of blind and grim feelings of personal revenge which soldiers could not so easily rid themselves of after having lost what is dear to every man in the war for destruction of the Slavic peoples unleashed by Hitler. […]"At another place, in a critical assessment of the West German expulsion documentation from the 1950s, the author reiterates her key statement: "There were no organized crimes, there was no deliberate killing of the civilian population through starvation!" Even though the existence of a killing program carried out by the state and ideologically motivated, like those of Not Socialism, may be excluded, the question remains whether the contemporary political leadership of the Soviet Union can therewith be considered as exculpated. In other words: can the massive acts of violence by Red Army soldiers be seen as individual excesses without any co-responsibility of their political and military leadership? Or where there structural reasons which can be seen as causal for the occurrences together with the specific circumstances of the moment, and which can be imputed to the political leadership of the Soviet state ?



Part 2(a) The Perpetrators

As the search for regional concentrations prominently sticking out in the overall image of these occurrences is unnecessary, except for what was already said about Rokossovsky’s 2nd Belorussian Front, there are basically two questions that remain to be clarified: where within the Red Army was the mass of the perpetrators to be found, and what causes related to both the army structure and the political-ideological leadership can be identified in this respect ?

Regarding the first question it must be said that, contrary to many German witness reports, the great mass of rapes and acts of violence cannot have been committed, as the Federal Archives stated in their internal evaluation of their witness material in the 1970s, "almost everywhere by soldiers and officers of the Soviet supply units". In these units, which in the final phase of the war made up about a third of the personnel of a front, there served a multitude of specialists from the industry, the administration and the transportation sector, besides many elder soldiers who had often been released from active combat duty. Furthermore it was especially in these units and the medical service that the greater part of those 800,000 Soviet women and girls who during the war saw front line service were to be found. Here, as in the higher officer corps, the number of so-called front line weddings and that of servicemen who had their wedded spouse beside them almost daily performing similar duties was especially high. Exceptions aside, the operative armored units of the tank corps and tank armies including their infantry support mostly mounted on the vehicles must also be excluded, for under the constant time pressure of the war of movement over large areas between the Vistula and the Oder they usually had no time for more than the often described hasty collecting of watches. Like the artillery, described by many Soviet war participants as the pool of the army’s intellectual elite, they were those least involved in excesses and crimes against the German population.


File: e2c9ba5bf317807⋯.jpg (146.15 KB, 816x684, 68:57, cry harder nazi.jpg)



No argument detected, none of your sources have any statistical or empircal stat of any kind.

>world view

look who's talking

>claims absurd number

That's you. My numbers are based on documented statistics. Yours are based on Goebbels hysteria propaganda.

>sources don't mention the word rape

You are an illiterate moron.


LOL no u


>Tuck your tail and run commie

No argument, cry harder nazi



Thus Colonel General Mikhail J. Katukov in his war memoirs remarked, certainly not by coincidence and not without satisfaction, that his own army military tribunals of the 1st Guards Tank Army, advancing at the head of the 1st Belorussian Front, "didn’t have to bother themselves with shameful behavior by our soldiers against the German civilian population."

The overwhelming majority of the acts of violence came from the infantry rifle units, who due to the known deep echelon deployment of the attacking Soviet troops showed themselves to the German population later, i.e. as the 2nd or 3rd echelon. Their task was to occupy the conquered territory on the heels of the advancing operative tank units and to clear it of enemy resistance. How this was done was described by Marshal Rokossovsky himself in his war memoirs on hand of the example of the conquest of Stolp within the scope of his army group’s operations in Eastern Pomerania in the first days of March 1945 by the 3rd Guards Tank Corps of Major General Aleksej P. Panfilov’s, acting as a motorized advance unit of the 19th Army: "[The tank soldiers] drove through the order of battle of the slowly advancing infantry, went around the city unnoticed with their tanks on forest tracks and attacked it by surprise from the flanks and the rear. […] Panfilov handed over the city with the booty and the prisoners to the infantry and took his corps further east." Reminiscent of archaic wartime customs, this short-term handing over of conquered cities with a corresponding license to plunder for the troops is today confirmed by former Soviet officers also for East Prussia.

The reasons for the infantry’s special predisposition for acts of violence are of various nature and essentially touch their situation within the army structure. First of all it was the largest arms category in terms of numbers. Their exorbitantly high losses, which in the last 28 months of the war made up 86.5 percent of all losses and thus far exceeded those of other arms categories also in relative terms, led to a high fluctuation within the ranks. The fast throughput of personnel, with the roster of whole battalions and regiments being almost completely exchanged within a few weeks, meant that, unlike in the technical combat units, hardly any firm primary groups could develop to psychically stabilize and have a regulatory effect on the individual soldier. Based on his own first-hand experience, Lev Kopelev vividly described the difference between the types of men and characters among the various arms categories of the Red Army and expressed his sympathy for the young, intellectually interested weapons specialist of mostly student background, a type of soldier that was much rarer in the infantry: "There the people were more randomly bunched together, the losses were higher, the composition of ranks and officers changed more frequently, firmly rooted comradeship could not come into being. […] In the infantry the service is tougher, customs are rougher; the young officers quickly become crude and hard."


Ukranians are amongst the most retarded people to exist. Good thing they are a useless cuck state with no real power.



Obviously there was also arbitrary behavior by individual troop commanders below divisional level, who for a time let their soldiers do as they pleased, but thereby clearly violated existing regulations. Rigorous orders for restoring discipline and putting an end to senseless destruction and illegal booty collecting were issued both by the front line courts martial and the military criminal prosecution authorities already in the first days after the crossing of the Reich border. For Rokossovskij’s 2nd Belorussian Front such an order was already issued on 22 January, for the 1st Ukrainian Front in Silesia under Marshal Ivan S. Konev on 27 January 1945, for the 3rd Belorussian Front under Colonel General Ivan D. Cernjakovskij apparently only later. The measures to restore troop discipline, which expressly condemned “cases of use of weapons by army members against the German population, especially women and children” and threatened severe punishment of the perpetrators [Footnote: Federal Archives-Military Archives Freiburg, RH 2/2687, pages 88 and following and 159-163 (German), here page 160: circular of the military prosecutor of the 48th Army to all prosecutors of his divisions of 23 January 1945], were accompanied by a series of lecturing articles in the army press, initiated by an article of 9 February 1945 in the defense ministry’s organ ‘Krasnaya Zvezda’ (Red Star) headed “Our Revenge” and containing the statement: “Our revenge is not blind, our anger not unreasonable”. Nevertheless a marked decrease of the wave of violence was not to be observed before the conquest of Danzig on 30 March and of Königsberg on 9 April 1945.



A Change of Policy

A political calculation favored the violent behavior, insofar at was restricted to the region east of Oder and Neisse. It resulted from the fact that the postwar fate of these areas had already been decided about in a secret, (people’s) Polish - Soviet border agreement of 27 July 1944, due to which both partners had no interest in a sparing treatment of the German population remaining there. On the contrary: an ethnic cleansing of these regions through a flight unleashed in the course of the combat actions was even bound to be considered a desired effect. This changed radically only with the Red Army’s advance onto the territory of the later Soviet Occupation Zone in the course of the “Berlin Operation” since 16 April 1945. Now the task was to build a constructive relationship towards the German people on the soil of the own occupation zone and to give clear signs in this direction. On 14 April 1945 Ehrenburg was thus publicly lectured on grounds of his destructive hate - and revenge propaganda by the propaganda department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The political proclamations to the troops at the beginning of the offensive on Oder and Neisse now emphasized, contrary to what had been the case during the January offensive at the Vistula, the proletarian internationalism and the “brotherly alliance with the German workers”. “Hate against the Germans, hit the Germans!” was now considered “the slogan of ordinary, i.e. bourgeois patriotism”. [Footnote: F.J. Bokov, Frühjahr des Sieges und der Befreiung (“Spring of Victory and Liberation”), Berlin 1981, page 150.]

Another signal followed on 17 April 1945, when a decision of 3 February of that year was modified to the effect that the recruitment and deportation of forced laborers from the German population was stopped. Three days later Stalin himself, in a directive of his headquarters to the soldiers of 20 April headed “About the Change of Behavior of Red Army Troops towards the German Prisoners of War and the Civilian Population”, pointed out the need of a change for the better in this respect: “A more humane behavior towards the Germans”, it was stated therein, would facilitate “the conduction of military operations on their territory and diminish their resistance”. Furthermore a population frightened to death would organize itself in bands, which was also “of disadvantage for us”. Even ordinary members of the NSDAP should not be bothered if they showed themselves loyal towards the Red Army. Only the leaders were to be arrested “if they have not yet managed to get away”. In parallel to this proclamations were issued to the German population not to give credence to rumors about “Bolshevik atrocities” and massive deportations, together with the advice to neither flee now follow any evacuation orders.



If the Soviets had returned to the Germans even only 10 percent of all the evil they had done to them during the War, Germany would have been erased from existence. The sordid attempts to tarnish the Red Army are nothing more than mass media posting scandal stories and do not correspond to factual evidence and genuine memoirs. To those who do write these, I have only one thing to say, Goebbels applauds you.



The poster is a Serb though


someone screencap this shit



Serbs are the other autistic slavic folk.


File: ad3fc5a0b40ce13⋯.jpg (139.34 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, really makes you think.jpg)

>on one side stale platitudes and autistic screeching

>on the other side actual sources and statistics


File: cdb672a4b5d590d⋯.jpg (269.21 KB, 800x1086, 400:543, SMALL_PROMO-800x1086.jpg)

Ukraine propaganda machine totally gone bananas. Can we fix wonderworld on pic?


File: b298466da9c119d⋯.png (551.8 KB, 970x582, 5:3, 40d1c1e3-6adf-43b6-bdd9-32….png)



Did Ukraine even had an army back then..



They only have it in wet dreams.



>Soviets are zombies


File: f881dee668ca77d⋯.png (226.2 KB, 507x367, 507:367, 10 out of 10.PNG)


>No argument detected, none of your sources have any statistical or empircal stat of any kind.

see any single one of my comments

You're just throwing ad homs, refusing to take anything besides from state funded propaganda, and besides eating shit you're slurping piss as well.

>That's you. My numbers are based on documented statistics. Yours are based on Goebbels hysteria propaganda.

Care to prove that, without strawman this time? Come on it can be the first time.

>No argument, cry harder nazi

>anyone opposed to communism is a nazi

I was thinking I was a liberal back then? Am I, a liberal nazi now?


>If the Soviets had returned to the Germans even only 10 percent of all the evil they had done to them during the War, Germany would have been erased from existence.

So by your math, the Russians were erased from existence 10 times?


He proved nothing but that he misused information and threw ad homs. I mean really, anyone not supporting his views must be wrong because Russian propaganda said otherwise.



File: 87909d2844afced⋯.png (141.57 KB, 500x552, 125:138, capitalist defenders.png)


>see any single one of my comments

Yeah I only see drivel

>You're just throwing ad homs

Nope, you are

>efusing to take anything besides from state funded propaganda

He says while providing sources backed by the CIA and nazi-supporters

>Care to prove that, without strawman this time

I already did, unlike you.

>anyone opposed to communism is a nazi

Not what I said. You are a nazi because you support and use nazi sources and play the same tired Goebbels propaganda.

>I was thinking I was a liberal back then

same shit in the end, enemies of the people.

>So by your math, the Russians were erased from existence 10 times?

You are illiterate. The German population was far smaller than the Soviet population, yet even in ratio the civilian casualties of the Germans inflicted by the Soviets are a pittance. Meanwhile the Naizs exterminated not millions but 10s of millions of innocent civilians, and did so as an official policy rather than actions of rogue troops.

>he misused information and threw ad homs

I know you do

>anyone not supporting his views must be wrong because Russian propaganda said otherwise

I haven't cited russian propaganda, dip-shit /pol/ak.


File: c01cb20b4032b9e⋯.png (2.8 MB, 3323x3364, 3323:3364, France-chan.png)

>Here is France-chan holding her torn and raggedy looking flag.



Wrong flag anon


File: 2140ac04baba96b⋯.png (233.62 KB, 522x496, 261:248, flute.png)


>ur wrong because u post nazi propaganda

>no u most dogmatically believe in soviet propaganda

Dem mental gymnastics

>You are illiterate. The German population was far smaller than the Soviet population, yet even in ratio the civilian casualties of the Germans inflicted by the Soviets are a pittance. Meanwhile the Naizs exterminated not millions but 10s of millions of innocent civilians, and did so as an official policy rather than actions of rogue troops.

Where was Hitlers order for the Holocaust?

On a side note:

Soviet population before the conflict: ~190 million

German population before the conflict : ~70 million

Civilian deaths due to military activity and crimes against humanity:

Soviet Union: 8,668,000 to 11,400,000 / Adjusted by population size, 2.36% to 5.26% of the total population

Germany: 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 / Adjusted by population size, 2.14 % to 4.28% of the total population


File: 72c7c0dfd592c56⋯.png (3.14 MB, 1500x4092, 125:341, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 63c83cf444704c6⋯.png (3.19 MB, 1500x2702, 750:1351, ClipboardImage.png)

File: a6b78eb15c3e448⋯.png (2.2 MB, 1500x2406, 250:401, ClipboardImage.png)


>u most dogmatically believe in soviet propaganda

Literally did not but keep pissing yourself over that

>Hitler's orders for the holocaust

This shit again

1) I wasn't even talking about the Holocaust although a good third of the victims at least were soviets

2) The "Hitler's orders argument" is an appeal to authority argument that ignores the fact that the nazis destroyed many of their documents, despite which both physical evidence and commented evidence of the holocaust occurring exists.


>compares population and civilians dead and doesn't actually adjust for the differences in MILITARY size. 20 million soviet soldiers vs 6 million German, almost 4 times as many by the end of the war. Thus the Germans inflicted 4x the amount of civilian deaths/crimes against humanity according to YOUR sourceless statistics, because they were 1/4 the size of the Soviet army. This is also ignoring that most civilian deaths and losses in Germany were caused by the Western allies, and their strategic bombing, rather than anything else.



That's the flag of Yugoslavia without the red star. France has a vertical tricolour.



>but guise the Ukrainians aren't fashist !111!!1

Getting tired of being proven right tbh


File: 72dbb0b558383ba⋯.png (994.17 KB, 1000x827, 1000:827, khrushchev gun.png)


>german military casualties are "the result of Soviet war crimes"



File: 38db9e3b09e7c9c⋯.jpg (95.88 KB, 960x960, 1:1, izreal.jpg)


If the civilians are a part of the military, then the German battle efficiency must have been much higher than the stated.


File: 8c35e0f9e38af60⋯.png (513.99 KB, 500x707, 500:707, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 23ab6693c8e88e1⋯.png (1.82 MB, 702x2649, 234:883, ClipboardImage.png)


>A study published by the German government in 1989

Which one? East Germany and West Germany did not unite until 1991 onwards

>the Soviets would have gladly launched a strategic bombing offensive had they the capability

No quotations or source to this claimed quote, not by you nor in the book.

Copy-pasting storm-front rants is not a great argumentative tactic.

>Germans have twice the efficiency

Nope, in terms of losses the German to Sovie military loss ratio was 1:1.3, mostly because the Germans had the intiative of a surprise attack and were brutalizing Soviet troops, who did not brutalize POWs NEARLy as much as the Germans did.

For once your sources that you cited aren't trash... except that they don't prove your point, they're just random bits of almost irrelevant information.


File: d97f5a3f870775a⋯.png (221.44 KB, 555x782, 555:782, are you sure about that.PNG)


>A study published by the German government in 1989

Not the eastern one for sure.

>No quotations or source to this claimed quote, not by you nor in the book.


>Nope, in terms of losses the German to Sovie military loss ratio was 1:1.3, mostly because the Germans had the intiative of a surprise attack



>Casualties and losses

Axis: 5 million dead.

Allies/ Soviet Union: 8.7/10 million dead

I would not bet that it's 1.3, if the highest estimate is correct, then it's 1:2.

>who did not brutalize POWs NEARLy as much as the Germans did.

Except the ones it took out when the invasion began during the NKVD purges of political prisoners, then again the ratio is in play, Germans had to feed a larger part of the Soviet POWs when food was running low, Soviets had to deal with a much smaller army.

The number of Soviet prisoners vary but let's take both mediums:

Germans: ~400k, not including MIA (from 700-800k)

Soviets: ~2.5 m, including MIA

That's 8,3% loss for the grand total army size for the Soviets, and a 2,6% for the Germans.

But since they are confined to the eastern front the ratios of the losses, if we take the largest deployment number, would be approx.:

37,18% for the Soviets and 10.17% for the Germans that died in POW camps.

But once you add the approx. reserves in the total army size you get a number for the Soviets that would be: 14.70%.



>No quotations from Sokolovsky

>No citation or mention of WHERE he supposedly said this. i know that the Soviets lacked strategic bombing capability comparable to the US and UK (though unlike the former they had to move all their factories to the East, rebuild them and then start production so…) but I have never heard a quote as such.


>Axis: 5 million dead.

>Allies/Soviet Union: 8.7/10 million dead

More of these number games

GERMAN losses were 5 million dead give or take a few hundred thousand, over-all Axis losses in Europe were higher.

According to Glantz's Soviet-German War 1941-1945: Myths and Realities, (one of the best analyses of the Eastern Front Losses),

the total number of casualties (killing, missing, or captured) for the Red Army is 14.7 million. By the same metric, the Germans lost 10,758,000 men on the Eastern Front. Glantz also counts 1,725,000 men from Hungary, Italy, Romania, and Finland (all part of the Axis) thus bringing up total Axis losses to 12483000 which is only 2 million fewer than the Soviet losses and since the Axis army was smaller than the Soviet army that means the Axis loss ratio was higher.

>when the invasion began during the NKVD purges of political prisoners

They didn't, most were either evacuated East or had their cases reviewed and released. Executions were limited to real criminals or military officers who showed criminal negligence.

>Germans had to feed a larger part of the Soviet POWs

Soviet POWs were kept in the same concentration camps the Jews were kept in, and treated the same. Thus the Germans had far less trouble caring for them… because they basically didn't.

I can only quote Colonel-General Hoepner. On May 2nd 1941 he stated,

"The war against the Soviet Union is an essential component of the German people's struggle for existence. It is the old struggle of the Germans against the Slavs, the defense of European culture against the Muscovite-Asiatic flood, the warding off of Jewish Bolshevism. This struggle must have as its aim the demolition of present Russia and must therefore be conducted with unprecedented severity. Both the planning and the execution of every battle must be dictated by an iron will to bring about a merciless, total annihilation of the enemy. Particularly no mercy should be shown toward the carriers of the present Russian-Bolshevik system." - (Hitler's Army: Soldiers, Nazis, and War in the Third Reich By Omer Bartov, Pg 128-129)

This was their sentiment from the very beginning and part of their ideology and military doctrine. The soviets never had this and in fact repeatedly had political officers inform the soldiers that they must not blame the people of Germany… Human hared and revenge, can over-rule the rules they set for themselves at times. The Germans did not have this as their goal from the beginning was the destruction and helotization of Russia.

- https://books.google.com/books?id=QSpUZ6t6BPwC&pg=PA4#v=onepage&q&f=false

- https://books.google.com/books?id=ATCXucbTYX0C&pg=PA161#v=onepage&q&f=false

“Lächerliche hundert Millionen Slawen”, so Hitler am 6.8.1942, “werden wir absorbieren oder verdrängen. Wenn hier einer von Betreuen spricht, dem muss man gleich ins KZ stecken” (Speer, 1981, 422).

Source of quote: Speer, A., Der Sklavenstaat. Meine Auseinandersetzung mit der SS, Stuttgart 1981, as quoted in Gunnar Heinsohn, Lexikon der Völkermorde, Hamburg 1998, page 305.

Translation (Heinsohn): “A ridiculous 100 million Slavs”, said Hitler on 6.8.1942, “we will absorb or displace. Whoever speaks of taking care of these people should be put in a concentration camp right away” (Speer, 1981, 422).





The Soviets actually treated their POWs within the international laws of conventions. GERMANY definitively signed the convention of the 1929 Geneva Convention and according to Article 82:

“The provisions of the present Convention shall be respected by the High Contracting Parties in all circumstances. In time of war if one of the belligerents is not a party to the Convention, its provisions shall, nevertheless, remain binding as between the belligerents who are parties thereto.”

Thus Germany, disregarded this and openly violated the convention, Being quite official. On Pg 153 of Professor René Provost’s 2002 book, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press) one can find a very important quotation,

“Germany, for her part, complied with the 1929 Convention in its treatment of prisoners of war from treaty parties such as France or United Kingdom, but refused to grant similar treatment to Soviet prisoners of war because the USSR was not a party and refused to agree to apply the Convention” [6]

Note 6: A distinction graphically illustrated by Marcel Junod, Le Troisieme combattant (Geneva ICRC, 1989) 262

When Admiral Canaris pointed out to Keitel vis-a-vis international law - that regardless of whether or not the Soviet Union was party to the 1929 Geneva Convention, the members of its armed forces remained entitled to the protections of customary rules of international humanitarian law. Keitel's arrogant response is oft stated as:

'The objections arise from the military concept of chivalrous warfare. This is the destruction of an ideology. Therefore I approve and back the measures'

Even the claim that the USSR did not sign conventions is subject to debate in the light of various bits of information that has been floating to the surface.

Memorandum of the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs of the USSR to the Swedish Mission in the USSR:

“In response to the memorandum of the Swedish in Moscow of 14 July, in which the Swedish government asks to inform it whether the Soviet Union in the present war with Germany recognizes itself bound by the Hague Convention of 18 October 1907 on laws and customs of war on land, the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs has an honor to report the following:

The Soviet Government recognizes itself bound by the Hague Convention of 18 October 1907 on laws and customs of war on land. However, the Soviet government finds it necessary to emphasize that in the war with the fascist Germany the Soviet Union is dealing such an enemy which systematically rudely violates all the international treaties and conventions. That presents the Soviet government with a necessity to observe the above mentioned Hague Convention in regard to the fascist Germany only as far as this convention is observed by Germany itself.” -Moscow. 17 July 1941

This memorandum was presented to the the Swedish ambassador in the USSR on 17 July 1941. Original Russian source is the official publication "Documents of foreign policy". Vol.24: МИНИСТЕРСТВО ИНОСТРАННЫХ ДЕЛ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ ДОКУМЕНТЫ ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКИ 22 июня 1941 - 1 января 1942 МОСКВА «МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ» 2000 ТОМ ДВАДЦАТЬ ЧЕТВЕРТЫЙ

>Soviets had to deal with a much smaller army.

The German army was smaller, but it had the forces of Western Europe behind it. Not to mention that a large portion of Soviet forces were PERMANENTLY on the Manchurian border to make sure Japan didn't attack as well.



On another key point, according to Order No. 270, all Soviet armed forces, that surrender to the Germans had "set out severe penalties for deserters and senior officers regarded as derelicting their duties."

So basically they are dead either way because back home they would be seen as cowards or traitors.>>2762085



only 0.5% of deserts were actually executed

yawn, you are boring AND stupid





File: 76ddbf65360e3a7⋯.png (196.7 KB, 618x525, 206:175, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 22ae84879fdf966⋯.png (315.86 KB, 658x580, 329:290, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 4c7cfa2356bd645⋯.png (225.03 KB, 610x538, 305:269, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 08c2a036c9cb1c9⋯.png (270.63 KB, 942x609, 314:203, ClipboardImage.png)


>Semantics, know what you read before you post it.

I do, which is why I posted it, not all civilian casualties were deaths, no? Same goes for military, yes, no?

>more ad hominum about "muh propaganda"



>All this typical /leftpol/-tier rubbish about "anyone who opposed Stalin". Solzhenitsyn is objectively a unreliable source.

I can only point out that Sholokhov, the anti-soviet writer who wrote Quiet Flows the Don, not only did NOT get put in the GULAG for that book but received the highest award in the USSR despite the book being bitterly critical of the soviets.





"Almost a million Gulag prisoners were released during World War II to serve in the military. The archives reveal that more than half of all gulag deaths for the 1934-53 period occurred during the war years (1941-45), mostly from malnutrition, when severe privatization was the common lot of the entire Soviet population. (Some 22 million Soviet citizens perished in the war.) In 1944, for instance, the labor-camp death rate was 92 per 1000. By 1953, with the postwar recovery, camp deaths had declined to three per 1000." - Parenti, Michael. Blackshirts and Reds, San Francisco: City Light Books, 1997, p. 79

>Yury Boshyk

Another Ukrainian nationalist shill, FFS ad cited by yet another shill.

>citationless anecdotal quote that does not have any actual basis to it. It was physically impossible for the NKVD to have done this in the time period given. It was physically impossible for them to have done a simple shoot-in-the-back-of-the-head execution, let alone torture them as you and your retarded sources falsely claim.

>herry-picked half of the Geneva COnvention,

<ignores the other half explicitly stating that they must adhere to it with those that have not signed it

<Ignores the fact that the USSR did join and that it had signed prior conventions on humanitarian treatment and war which were still in effect.

<Ignores the fact that the USSR itself did adhere to them and had no official, or ideological policy aimed against the general German Population.

This is why people like you are hated, you make a carefully selective argument, which requires 10x the effort to debunk because you ommit 90% of the context and facts of the matter and only use the supposedly condemning part.



Maybe someone should make an archived version with the specific sources highlighted? Espresso Stalinist crammed a lot of stuff in that section



>The rest were imprisoned and treated as traitors, and what was left served in the penal battalions, meaning, they'd be meat for the slaughter.

Penal Battalions were the default for any treasonous action, despite that it was only a 2 month service and if you shed blood or acted heroically you would immediately be transferred back into your original unit and given your rank back, not to mention awarded.

Here an entire documented account by a man who actually served in the Penal Battalions.

In other words: The idea of penal battalions was to let for criminals to redeem their fault "by blood".

If a member of a Soviet penal battalion was wounded or made a feat (captured a prisoner, for example) so he was considered redeemed his fault "by blood" and should return in his unit where he served before the penal battalion.

>Use a site translator, they're free, lazy fuck: http://lib.ru/MEMUARY/1939-1945/PEHOTA/pylcin.txt

>Interview with him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N3Mo7dyGYY

Also the Germans had their


Except that unlike the soviet one, it was far worse.


>ll Soviet armed forces, that surrender to the Germans had "set out severe penalties for deserters and senior officers regarded as derelicting their duties."

And? The same attitude is in every army. The British army would have you shot for merely opposing an officer.

>they are dead either way because back home they would be seen as cowards or traitors

If you are a soldier and surrender when you are armed and conscious then you are betraying your comrades. Obviously those soldiers who were injured or otherwise unable to fight and captured were not counted, which is why so few soviet POWs were treated criminally.


File: c248e10ded8e852⋯.png (10.48 MB, 1764x2634, 294:439, ClipboardImage.png)


>Semantics, know what you read before you post it.

Just to add some more since you're clearly a moron.

According to meticulous post-Soviet archival work (G. I. Krivosheev in Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses), the total number of men (and in the Soviet case, about 1mn women) who passed through the armed forces of the USSR was 34,476,700 and through Germany’s was 21,107,000. Of these, the “irrevocable losses” (the number of soldiers who were killed in military action, went MIA, became POWs and died of non-combat causes) was 11,285,057 for the USSR, 6,231,700 for Germany, 6,923,700 for Germany and its occupied territories, and 8,649,500 for all the Axis forces on the Eastern Front. Thus, the total ratio of Soviet to Nazi military losses was 1.3:1. Hardly the stuff of “Asiatic hordes” of Nazi and Russophobic imagination (that said, also contrary to popular opinion, Mongol armies were almost always a lot smaller than those of their enemies and they achieved victory through superior mobility and coordination, not numbers).

The problem is that during the Cold War, the historiography in the West was dominated by the memoirs of Tippelskirch, who wrote in the 1950’s citing constant Soviet/German forces ratios of 7:1 and losses ratio of 10:1. This has been carried over into the 1990’s (as with popular “historians” like Anthony Beevor), although it should be noted that more professional folks like Richard Overy are aware of the new research. Note also that cumulatively 28% and 57% of all Soviet losses were incurred in 1941 and 1942 (Krivosheev) respectively – the period when the Soviet army was still relatively disorganized and immobile, whereas for the Germans the balance was roughly the opposite with losses concentrated in 1944-45.

The idea that there were two soldiers for every rifle in the Red Army, as portrayed in the ahistorical propaganda film Enemy at the Gates, is a complete figment of the Russophobic Western imagination. From 1939 to 1945, the USSR outproduced Germany in aircraft (by a factor of 1.3), tanks (1.7), machine guns (2.2), artillery (3.2) and mortars (5.5), so in fact if anything the Red Army was better equipped than the Wehrmacht (sources – Richard Overy, Why the Allies Won; Chris Chant, Small Arms).

Early in the war the Soviets understood that a precision built bolt action rifle with sights graduated to 1200 yards was an expensive option and one that required considerable time and resources to train huge numbers of troops on. The Mosin–Nagant of which they made 37,000,000 was a good weapon but one that only a small percentage of their infantrymen could use to its maximum potential and as with all bolt guns was cursed with a slow rate of fire and a limited magazine capacity.

The soviets realized sooner than anyone else that 90% of infantry combat takes place at close range (<=200 meters) where full power cartridges like their 7.62mm X 54R were over powered and the bolt action rifles that fired such heavy hitters had a low rate of fire. Soviet doctrine demanded that in meeting engagements their troops should be able to establish direct fire superiority quickly and then maneuver under the cover of that high volume of fire. Of course the Germans wanted the same capability but were too slow to implement the changes required in time.

The German Solution:

Was to place light belt fed machine guns with high rates of fire such as the MG-34 with its ~900 round/min rate of fire with infantry platoons. Thus the German squad armed predominantly with bolt action rifles was centered around its base of fire the MG34.

The Soviet Solution (s):

•On one level the Soviets adopted the same solution with the 7.62mm X 54R DP-28 drum fed light machine gun acting as the base of fire and the rest of the unit armed with bolt action rifles.

•Another Soviet solution was the creation of SMG battalions where the predominant weapon was the easy to manufacture PPSh-41 sub machine gun (1000 rounds/min) that was supported by DP-28 LMG and designated marksmen armed with either Mosin–Nagant bolt guns or SVT-40 semi automatic rifles. These units could send clouds of lead at German troops while in the attack at a dead run.

Imagine 20 Germans with 1 MG-34, 4 MP-40s and 15 bolt action rifles facing 20 Soviets with 2 DP-28s, 6 SVT-40s and 12 PPSh-41s. The German unit is over matched with respect to the volume of fire it can deliver. And it take less time and effort to train a sub machine gunner than an effective rifleman.


File: ff0a9278e6841d2⋯.jpg (9.78 KB, 190x265, 38:53, indexммм.jpg)



Where i can download full pack of soviet caricatures?


File: d7ad2d923104fa8⋯.png (861.33 KB, 1080x778, 540:389, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 05a5a88070e235d⋯.png (1.58 MB, 1200x1003, 1200:1003, ClipboardImage.png)



>I specified it in the earlier comments. Mine was categorically more correct, far more. Mine didn't include famine, disease, starvation and other effects, they included HR violations and direct military action.

Not at all. Your numbers were primarily on Civilian losses, on military losses you lack any such specifics. No dodging needed, when there is nothing to dodge


No, but it provides a definitive example that voicing an opinion was not definitive of the Gulag, And the statistics and sources I posted, acertained by 3 very respected WESTERN historians show that

Most GULAG prisoners were NOT political and that 97% of the population was not affected in any way by political repression.


definitively not, Sholokhov was a very principled and stubborn man, who was anti-soviet throughout his life. But hey, its easy for you to slander a dead man.

> you are emphasising the fact that he wasn't sent to jail really tells a lot about the Soviets

Yes because that's the retarded claim being made, which is untrue. But keep trying to throw shade, just don't forget your tinfoil hat.

>Germans also had Slavs and Jews among their ranks

Except they treated them as cannon fodder and used them. False equivalency.

>God you're retarded.

No, that's you.

> overall oppression, subjugation, and humiliation

Nope, neither ideologically nor in offical policy was this present in the USSR or the Red Army. Keep making shit up.

>it was all so swell that they built a wall around Berlin

<M-muh wall

Berlin could have been shot up by the end of January courtesy of a tank division that shattered the front in its section, only to be ordered to stand down because the big boys hadn't had their conference on how to split Europe yet.

to this day pretend that there was no attacks carried out against the SU or GDR. they literally bombed a fucking military airport and organized acts of sabotage and terror in the GDR. that's even acknowledged by western media.


It was mined, there was a trench to block vehicles as well as a line of obstacles for APCs on certain strategic locations. Plus there were guard towers with armed guards and automatic rifles. Westerners claim that those were there solely to keep DDR citizens from fleeing to the west which is obviously bullshit, the main purpose was to block NATO spies and saboteurs from trespassing into DDR territory or out of DDR territory. Actually, nobody had to flee and risk his or her life on the border. You could legally leave the DDr for good and move to the West. In order to do that you would have to ask the authorities to get your citizenship removed. When the authorities approved of that request (process time could take years though) you could just pack your shit together, hop on a train and settle in the oh so free West. I think the process was called Ausreiseantrag or Übersiedlungsantrag.

the authorities had a reason for calling the border "Antifaschistischer Schutzwall", it may have prevented something awful. It was unpopular among the general population and made it easy for Western propaganda to portray the DDR negatively. The West attempted to lure people into working in the West by paying them higher wages than usual. However the closed border between the BRD and DDR was one of the most important if not the most important strategic frontlines during Cold War. Before it was built in the early 1960s the border was open and there was free movement between the BRD and DDR for all citizens of either the BRD and DDR, yet the majority of the 17 million DDR citizens felt no desire to move to the BRD for better wages or whatever


1) No signs of torture visible

2) Estonia had plenty of nationalists imprisoned prior to the war, nationalists who committed acts of terror and prior to joining the USSR, began the same anti-Jewish spiel that Germany had.

3) the Picture is claimed to be Tartu 1941, Estonia, but where is the evidence that it was the NKVD who did this? The Germans shot prisoners in soviet jails because they didn't have the time to handle them.

The number of NKVD prison executions are vastly over-stated and in fact, the largest execution was 714 people by Taber and Mohov, which was against orders. They were put on tribunal and executed for their crime.




no that's for nazi posters


File: 99c5b35b53cb22e⋯.png (264.14 KB, 932x471, 932:471, ClipboardImage.png)


>copy pasta, strawmanning, and ad homing

1) Copy-pasting my own work isn' tan issue, regardless, that statement is in itself an ad hominum, you are attacking the fact that some of my argument is copy-pasted, and not the argument itself

2) Strawmans have been yours and only yours

3) ad hominum used by me has always been based on facts, such as the fact that citationless anecdotes are not serious sources, and that you are an idiot because you rely on them. Your ad hominum has been "muh evul commies"

>you're using the total number of undeployed in the Eastern Front, and the overall German casualties and deployments.

>I've had my fun with you

Already said that, yet you keep coming back, like a retarded boomerang no-one wants

>have fun supporting failed systems.

That's you, wehraboo



Do you think politics is like Monopoly where things just change in 5 seconds? You do realize that Capitalism tried and was suppressed repeatedly before it finally became a prominent economic system in the world. Your logic is this, the first airplanes made didn't fly well, that's mean we shouldn't try and make planes. That's not how the world works you dipshit.



>Germans would shoot Soviet political prisoners who are nationalists and anti-Soviet and decide not to use them

Yes they did, because not all were stupid enough or willing to slave under the Germans. Just as an example the total number of Soviet citizens that went over to the Nazis was approximately 300,000. Soviet Partisans on the other hand made up over a million people.

>it was decided to execute the prisoners.

Ok, but then where is the torture, what are the specifics? WHO were they executing? How do you know they were POLITICAL criminals?

>sample camp

Not an refutation, the CIA literally has every reason to make the soviets out to be evil.

>why so many non Germans had such high positions in the SS and the Nazi government

It was not very many. They were exceptions, not the rule. Unlike Sholokhov. Or are you saying that only 3% of the USSR's population were political dissidents? Doesn't that mean that people LIKED the USSR?

>need to jump higher to fly

"And if planned economies, benevolent dictatorships, perfectionistic societies, and other utopian ventures have failed, we must remember that unplanned, undictated, and unperfected cultures have failed too. A failure is not always a mistake; it may simply be the best one can do under the circumstances. The real mistake is to stop trying. Perhaps we cannot now design a successful culture as a whole, but we can design better practices in a piecemeal fashion." - B.F. Skinner

>neither does communism

You are such a bad reader that, in your attempt to make a stale "communism doesn't work" meme, you essentially confirmed my point.


File: 5f0a97364fc2d8c⋯.png (4.99 MB, 2728x3581, 2728:3581, Ameri-chan.png)

>Here's Ameri-chan, because why not.


File: 2d36a0c72ea586d⋯.jpg (48.01 KB, 700x871, 700:871, American critisism of comm….jpg)


>the Baltic states, and Ukraine welcomed the Nazi invasion

This myth again

>Germans had volunteers from every single nation they went into

True, but compared to those that volunteered to fight against them they pale in comparison.

>How do you know they were POLITICAL criminals

That's my point, it says "execute criminals" statistically speaking if for every 100 people executed only 30 would have been political dissidents.

>Would the CIA spend their time killing common thugs

Well they do, when it is necessary. You're making a false comparison, because the NKVD was more than jsut like the CIA< it was a combination of the FBI and CIA.

>cherry picking a single CIA file

<ignoring all the other evidence,

<not actually debunking the CIA article

Quality matters more than quantity. In both spheres my sources beat yours

>Sample camp as evidence

Do you realize what sample camp means you dumb fuck? You do realize that prison statistics in the USA itself do not involve a review of every single prison, unless you're doing a population survey.

>CIA doc

And? The document does not contradict my point. Not to mention that you're still ignoring the rest of my sources.

>Capitalism fails many times, but it manages to survive

Nope, there have been dozens of capitalist states the collapsed, some that became socialist

>communism hasn't

because communism as a definition has not existed, socialism has, and very successfully, lasting 3 generations in the USSR, still existing in the DPRK and Cuba and Burkina Faso.

>Or, complied because, they didn't want to be persecuted by a totalitarian regime

Oh yeah, the country that, 10 years ago, over-threw the Tsar and has a long history of repeated revolts during the past 2 centuries prior to the USSR would be totally "afraid" of persecution suddenly, despite the soviet penal system being a pittance compared to what the Tsarist government did.








Cute, but where's the nuclear bomb she's always waving around?



File: dc1c9cf7042fa05⋯.png (31.08 KB, 311x447, 311:447, ClipboardImage.png)

File: d92d6b5f6cdbe9d⋯.png (47.75 KB, 479x427, 479:427, ClipboardImage.png)

File: a549ccdf7e348c0⋯.png (2.1 MB, 1500x1200, 5:4, ClipboardImage.png)


>many smaller states including the Baltics and Ukraine celebrated the fall of the USSR

Nope, the Ukrainian people do not support nazis. There were 220,000 Ukrainian partisans compared to the diminutive OUN UPA and their supporters.

As for the baltics, cherrypicking the smallest soviet states is a great argumentative tactic you manipulative liar, especially since, conveniently for you, the Baltics only became part of the USSR a year before WW-2 erupted on the Eastern front and thus nationalists would be crawling through the woodwork. By your logic, if Texas was to become part of Mexico again, pro-US Texans wouldn't be acting out if the US decided decided to start a war with Mexico.

>what was the number of partisans in compared to the 70k men enlisted in the German army

1) citation needed for that 70k

2) 60K people were evacuated from Estonia alone, thus the majority of people left were the nationalists and those that had not been able to escape. The Soviet partisans in Estonia numbered 1,500 people. However that still is ignoring the fact that there were 1 soviet MILLION partisans compared to only 300,000 citizens that enlisted on the German side.

>Berkhoff, Karel Cornelis (2004). Harvest of Despair

Harvest of despair, instantly dismissed. It's not a source to even use anecdotally.

>Over generalization and taking things out of context, the NKVD executed people for political reasons, if they wanted to kill criminals they'd kill the people in regular prisons.

>Just because it piled political prisoners among the criminals and accused them of criminal acts does not mean that they weren't primarily political prisoners.

Your argument has no basis, you're saying that they're primarily political prisoners because of some retarded idea that the NKVD only handled political executions, which is factually incorrect, and statistically my statement is not an over-generalization, I provided statistic data for the gulags on a yearly basis as compiled by 3 historians, Getty, Zemskov and Rittersporn. It makes no goddamn sense.

>Gulags were not only used in 1953

Doesn't debunk my point.

>State so good it collapsed in on itself

Not what happened. You're just making shit up at this point.





LOL so what? neo nazis are everywhere including states that were never under soviet rule. Plenty of them moved back after the USSR fell.



File: 0bf200ffbe27dbf⋯.png (692.92 KB, 550x696, 275:348, ClipboardImage.png)


>mods deleting posts

Because your posts are shitty nazi propaganda

>Can't even handle the truth

That's you

>COmmUnisM WaS NeVeR triED

It's a fact; Communism has never been done, Socialism has.


File: 69a34ad842ddd39⋯.jpg (78.06 KB, 640x640, 1:1, can't fail without a goal.jpg)

>Uses Ukranian nationalist as a buzzword even when he claims that they supported Stalin

I have never said Ukrainian nationalists supported Stalin, I said that the Ukrainian People supported the USSR, not nationalism m8.

>The first year of the war was devastating for the Soviet partisans of Ukraine. Nevertheless, between August 1941 and the beginning of March 1942, 30,000 partisans had been organised into more than 1,800 detachments; by the beginning of May 1942, there were just 37 detachments, consisting of 1,918 individuals, that were operational and communicating with the Soviet Union.

1) You never asked for Partisans on an annual basis, I provided the over-all number of partisans in Ukraine during WW2

2) copy-pasting wikipedia shows your mental retardation. I copy-pasted my own stuff, mostly because there is no point in re-writing the same thing a hundred times.

3) wikipedias sources are

>On 28 April 1943 the German Governor of District Galicia, Otto Wächter, and the local Ukrainian administration officially declared the creation of the SS Division Galicia. Volunteers signed for service as of 3 June 1943 numbered 80 thousand. Not counting the civilian collaborators and auxiliaries.

No citation provided

Also since you love wikipedia like a good NPC,

>In total 81,999 men enlisted for service in the division. Of these, 42,000 were called up during the first 'recruitment phase' which took place in May and June 1943 from which only 27,000 were deemed fit for military service and 13,000 were enlisted.

>Why do you love being wrong?

Ask yourself that.


File: 5120b766b7b173b⋯.png (147.37 KB, 689x334, 689:334, memes vs reading.png)



Is that why your only response is using anecdotes written by Ukrainian nationalists and anti-communist shills? And the only actually sourced information you provide is either proving your own argument wrong or is irrellevant?


File: dd76970bfa97eb6⋯.jpg (91.63 KB, 940x705, 4:3, McDonal'd.jpg)


>Ukrainian People supported the USSR

But everyone not licking Stalins ass must be a Ukrainian nationalist right.

>I provided the over-all number of partisans in Ukraine during WW2

>including the nationalist ones

Way to inflate numbers chap.

>No citation provided

>looks at his claim

>no citations for the 220,000 partizans


Even the UPA was against the Soviets.

>>In total 81,999 men enlisted for service in the division. Of these, 42,000 were called up during the first 'recruitment phase' which took place in May and June 1943 from which only 27,000 were deemed fit for military service and 13,000 were enlisted.

And I lied where? I only stated the number of people that signed up, not the ones given status of operative, showing how much the supply was bigger than the demand.


>This is what communists actually believe

>This is why they fail every time



>including the nationalist ones

No I didn't.

>No citation for 220,000

Because everytime I do you whine about it being in a language you don't understand

Here: История Великой Отечественной войны Советского Союза, 1941—1945 (в шести томах). / редколл., П. Н. Поспелов и др. том 6. М., Воениздат, 1965. стр.255

Of these 220,000 over 183,000 were awarded with medals for their fight.

Citation: Великая Отечественная война 1941—1945. События. Люди. Документы. Краткий исторический справочник / сост. Е. К. Жигунов, под общ. ред. О. А. Ржешевского. М., Политиздат, 1990. стр.226-227

>Even the UPA was against the Soviets.

The UPA was a nazi inspired group with the intention of creating a nationalist ethno-state, no-shit they're against the USSR.

> I lied where

You stated signed for service as of 3 June 1943 numbered 80 thousand

Except that only 1/2 that number had even attempted to enlist by June with only 1/2 being actually accepted

> the supply was bigger than the demand.

Nope, I proved otherwise, keep bitching.

>This is why they fail every time

Yeah, fail so much that the USA has to actively wage complete socio-economic warfare every time it's attempted because it's so 'weak'. So weak that a tiny Island nation, isolated from the world, has a better standard of living than a world super-power BECAUSE OF SOCIALISM.




See, this is what nazis do, every time a legitimate source is presented you throw it aside. Sorry burger, but languages other than English exist.


Read: https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=923279

>does not know what the words supply and demand mean

Oh I know what they mean and the demand was for getting rid of the nazi scum that decided that genocide 100 million people based on unfounded prejudice was a great plan. The Supply was 220,000 people willing to fight them to the death in Ukraine alone, and 1 million over the entire USSR, not including the millions of volunteers in the Red Army.

> supply and demand is too much for communism

LOL, says someone who supports a system that creates shit like fucking fidget spinner tooth-covers.


File: c29953e38c7f12e⋯.png (85.03 KB, 492x280, 123:70, Doubt.png)


>Polution index

>Cuba: High

>Amerika: Low




>Sample size of 4



>Not like Cuba is a small third world shithole or anything


>"Pollution Index is an estimation of the overall pollution in the city. The biggest weight is given to air pollution, than to water pollution/accessibility, two main pollution factors. Small weight is given to other pollution types."

Posting pic again since commie admin does not approve of anything he don't like my nig


File: 864762ceaacbc9d⋯.png (10.64 KB, 128x128, 1:1, thonking.png)


>American cities have a low air polution in cities but cuba, a country infamous for not having access to shit like cheap oil or coal, has high air polution.


File: 13f409d9662d1a7⋯.png (223.92 KB, 440x459, 440:459, ClipboardImage.png)

File: aaeea31a83f6f16⋯.png (292.48 KB, 500x615, 100:123, ClipboardImage.png)


>1 shitty infograph vs over 1 dozen different sources including the CIA's analytical report and the UN's

This is like that retarded "freest countries in the world" mpa that judges freedom based on how de-regulated a market is yet at the same time fails to use genuine statistics.

>Pollution index: High

LOL that makes no goddamn sense, considering that the USA is one of the 3 highest pollution creating countries in the world.

1st it's a Sample size of four and 2nd no factoring of Climate.

>purchasing power: Low

No shit, Sherlock, that's what economic isolation does, no matter how efficient your system.

>property price to income: High

<Cost of Living: Low

Something contradicts the other.

USA healthcare is high?






File: 25d67d4dd22457c⋯.png (474.02 KB, 640x635, 128:127, ClipboardImage.png)


>jpgs and newspaper articles

Not a refutation

>communism and economics don't go hand in hand

No argument

>Price of goods and services required for maintaining an average level standard of living.

Yeah, see the thing is, thats not a fair comparison. In Cuba housing is provided. in the USA housing is a good+service (electricity/gas).

>Even by WHO, USA is better than Cuba.

I cited the WHO, you're wrong, but hey, keep screeching and posting your dead memes.



>get told

>better start lecturing them on basic economic theory literally everyone knows

I'm surprised you haven't told him to read Sowell's awful book yet.

>P.S. Even by WHO, USA is better than Cuba.

They are about the same: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper30.pdf

Considering the forcibly imposed disadvantage Cuba has, I would say it has done quite well.

Keep in mind many of the nations below Cuba are objectively capitalist. Right wingers usually reconcile this by embracing racialism and saying that economics don't work for them because they are subhumans.



>And many nations above Cuba are? Overall more right than left when it comes to the x,y axis.

Because most nations in general are right wing these days, largely due to the dominance of American hierarchy.

>I'm off to do LSD, see you poorfags some other time

The right has yet to decide whether we are trust fund kids or jealous poor people. Let us know when you get that sorted.



>Jpgs aren't an argument.

No, but the words written in them are.

>For you

exactly, you provided no argument for me, glad we cleared that up.


Nope, in my sources, you need to read carefully

>Posts the same paper >>2763332

posted, that clearly points out how Cuba is literally 1 step behind the USA, and only because the USA is an Economic Giant. If you paid any attention to the sources I posted (which you don't because you are a capitalist shill) You'd see that Cuba outdoes the USA in all human parameters that matter, and not some arbitrary economic market game, since communism isn't about Markets you tool.

>many nations above Cuba are

First world capitalist imperialists that have had established industrial economies since the 1890s. Cuba reached their level in a few decades, despite starting off as a third-world country, being under economic sanctions and having none of the resources an empire like Britain, France or the USA does. As I pointed out in my mega-post, Cuba's economic drop after the 90s was due to the USSR, not longer being there and because the current Russian Federation undermines its trade and economic position.

>I'm off to do LSD

<doesn't realize that LSD can cause brain damage and that it was used by the CIA in illegal experiments trying to controlling US citizens


Ooooh what an insult.



It’s the other way around



You should be killed for saying such stupid things. Absolutely shameful display of willful ignorance and committed retardation. The man is not a “glass ceiling” feminist you 20 year old pseud coward. You, who has never made a worthwhile impact on a single person let alone founded an entire field of study, think you have any reason to conflate workplace feminism with the greatest thing that has ever happened to the working class, simply because you don't understand how to interpret someones work? Your ignorance grants no such right. You are a gutless child, something has happened in your brain that makes you think you can write shit like this.


File: 86806b20688bf52⋯.jpg (487.6 KB, 1580x2238, 790:1119, iceberg meme template.jpg)

Wanna fill this up with acts of capitalist imperialism and subversion, contribute whatever you can think of.

For example, Iraq and Afghanistan would be at the very top, US support for the Mujahideen would be #3, CIA using Afghanistan to produce opium would be #5. At the very bottom go obscure cases like potato beetles in East Germany.

Note: it all has to be factual (duh)



very bottom:

Cookie monster / Sesame Street



redpill me on this



File: feed8a7f79b3059⋯.jpg (67.43 KB, 888x499, 888:499, 1nasgq.jpg)

Wot u say m8



Fugg off Dengist



There should be a unionist massacre at every level varying on those killed and how many know of it.


File: c5f46cf6fb3672a⋯.png (321.17 KB, 300x404, 75:101, second age of humiliation ….png)

Took a while to shop this.


File: 6832a2dd2566a07⋯.png (1.7 MB, 3323x3549, 3323:3549, Grumpy Commie-chan.png)

Here is grumpy Commie-chan.



>When she's about to be nutted on


File: f6fd56c0ba4cfe3⋯.png (1.19 MB, 579x753, 193:251, posadprop.png)

quick n dirty


File: 503ff321dda6c8c⋯.jpg (30.96 KB, 901x1402, 901:1402, land.jpg)

Not my creation, but someone shared this on another imageboard as fresh OC, so whatever. Close enough.


File: e19b16e0fe8038a⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 47.7 KB, 1024x682, 512:341, 358014858df5e4b1d677097d0a….jpg)


Here ya go





File: 9a028fc7d9f848c⋯.png (2.66 MB, 1836x2429, 1836:2429, alunya pioneer.png)

I drew alunya as a young pioneer in honor of catgirl drawfriend who inspired me to draw please come back we miss you



She looks really cute and small.


I wish I could draw a halfway decent Tolstoy spurdo. Oh well, have some text I just whipped up, maybe someone can do something with it.

a gud ebenin to teh cristian fathful :DD

dhank u for democratiocaly selectind me

t. leo tolstoy

now for some reforms..




I made a new Y U G O W A V E channel and will be posting regularly, here is my first vid.


File: 7be96a5b652c312⋯.png (110.42 KB, 680x609, 680:609, ClipboardImage.png)


CountryLove template, use to your enjoyment


File: 6954c5acbe426b3⋯.jpg (72.86 KB, 1141x1458, 1141:1458, resized_JPEG_1545857189520….jpg)

>Nikita (Никита)

>Just wanted to make another russian character.


File: 2da5a19f3605c8e⋯.png (235.48 KB, 600x784, 75:98, 1545883441519.png)

Time to turn this /pol/ meme around


File: 3061ccd51321447⋯.pdf (307.63 KB, Schenk, David H. - Freedme….pdf)


This shit belongs somewhere. Basically, gun control is used to take guns away from vulnerable people (in this case recently freed blacks) so they are vulnerable to violence.

>wypipo fraid of blacks with guns (many had guns from civil war)

>cops take guns away for "safety"

>KKK massacres them

>some KKK members get killed

>they are cops

many such cases


File: ebd7b00bb6c6c44⋯.png (6.2 MB, 2560x3495, 512:699, 104020747392.png)


File: e25c06b25ab1153⋯.jpg (1.09 MB, 1728x2592, 2:3, kronstadt.jpg)


Hey guys. It's "I Punched Richard Spencer" song anon. Was thinking of big events I hadn't written songs about, and I wanna do one about Daniel Shaver. I think that image really continues to resonate. Y/n


Does anyone have that Spongebob meme that's an edit of the wallet scene but with a Marxist Leninist trying to convince an Anarchist?


File: 095a8d56bdb2255⋯.png (3.27 MB, 1888x3838, 944:1919, Sb-91.png)


>A tank made in Serbia in 1991

>Other Information about her is unknown



this makes no sense whatsoever. CNN is giving them logic and reasoning skills?


File: 1e863bbd3ee3064⋯.png (4.44 MB, 1770x2183, 30:37, ClipboardImage.png)


On the booru m8, look harder



Panama obvs needs a place



>dictatorship of the proletariat is literal because guns don't work when fired by non-tankies


File: 5048b36819f245c⋯.png (504.54 KB, 567x815, 567:815, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 9f0ea229b3e869a⋯.png (415.07 KB, 960x827, 960:827, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 9b8bfc3d30c23cb⋯.png (209.83 KB, 704x632, 88:79, ClipboardImage.png)

File: dbb4f5d5c42bc00⋯.png (252.08 KB, 674x754, 337:377, ClipboardImage.png)


>guns don't work

Not the argument

>muh ☭TANKIE☭s



Where's the OC? It looks like anime and right-wing meme ripoffs. The only decent OC was the infographics.



>criticizing opaque autocracy makes you an anarchist


File: 656c3192bc8d606⋯.jpg (3.8 KB, 340x367, 340:367, original.jpg)


HOW DARE leftypol STEAL MY OC!!!



>using big accusatory words is an argument

keep whining.


This thread recycles, a lot of OCs are shifted, most uploaded to the booru.



The meme doesn't work because the amount of energy output from the explosions wouldn't have been enough to power a country for a year, let alone five years.

Just as an example, the 2nd explosion was 40GJ (40 billion joules), which is what some single houses use in a month in modern times. Hell, the yearly US energy consumption is 94 EJ (94 quintillion joules).



Whatever, I did it -


Was gonna do it straight, but one mic was missing. The other comes through really fucked so I multitracked the vox. Wayyy in the red.


File: 70a73802c0daea3⋯.png (163.93 KB, 624x599, 624:599, anti opportunist action.png)

File: 8b0301ac9186759⋯.jpg (51.92 KB, 750x750, 1:1, blue bordiga 1.jpg)

memes remastered



here's a good starting point: https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/us_atrocities.md

surface: MKULTRA LSD experiments, COINTELPRO, Abu Ghraib, Agent Orange/Napalm, Operation Paperclip, Snowden NSA leaks, Operation GLADIO, Operation Condor



>Abu Ghraib

Oh yeah, and don't forget literal child rape was used as a method of 'interrogation' in this one.


File: f33c1cda53e21bb⋯.jpg (48.72 KB, 396x545, 396:545, soviet_sweeping_print_21a_….jpg)

File: e568cc93ca55ebb⋯.jpg (176.55 KB, 396x545, 396:545, lenin.jpg)



File: 705ab5b77dc3bd7⋯.png (1.98 MB, 1713x2999, 1713:2999, Righty-Chan.png)


>A character based off of the political right.

>2019 isn't starting on a good note.


File: 62877bdd712fd46⋯.jpg (162.85 KB, 1440x2256, 30:47, Screenshot_2019-01-01_1828….jpg)


File: a71a122434f8133⋯.gif (432.32 KB, 400x225, 16:9, shaver2.gif)


Re-did it - this version's better, tho in a quieter vocal range and still in the red a lot.






We need this




very cute


very zombie-esque tbh



An entire subreddit has been made for Stonetoss edits. It has a lot of liberal idpol sadly. https://old.reddit.com/r/antifastonetoss/new/


File: e09c7446809351b⋯.png (328.9 KB, 1206x1080, 67:60, ukraine.png)


File: 7fa09bf93f792e5⋯.jpg (153.55 KB, 1395x1015, 279:203, nyarome hammers sickles.jpg)

File: e28be61d4805781⋯.png (470.01 KB, 540x577, 540:577, nyarome death to the bourg….png)

File: 14859b3d5a4d969⋯.png (67.26 KB, 540x199, 540:199, protestor nyarome.png)

Requesting something with Nyarome.

Preferably having him with Catalunya


File: 12f92a8ede7ab1b⋯.png (552.06 KB, 500x500, 1:1, leftypol moderation.png)



Bitter the communist's journey, and lonely the communist's grave.


File: 096ebe9e7e3f8da⋯.jpg (203.17 KB, 750x908, 375:454, jew.jpg)

here i made a thing


File: ee25e458cd2ac6e⋯.jpg (195.95 KB, 750x908, 375:454, jew2.jpg)


That was in the original I based it on. Here, a lesswords for you.


File: 54301bef361a83b⋯.jpg (274.35 KB, 902x730, 451:365, Stfu.jpg)


I love it. Here, have a variation of something I posted above.


File: 9d824439b88e03c⋯.png (16.01 KB, 930x640, 93:64, 1547483102994.png)

File: 9b0d6570fe7a78c⋯.jpg (348.21 KB, 1536x2048, 3:4, 1547464468840.jpg)

File: 79594594eb80864⋯.jpeg (286.96 KB, 1536x2048, 3:4, DwfxCYDVYAA29gj.jpeg)

File: e5d4fa5a27fa9d8⋯.jpeg (283.57 KB, 2592x1944, 4:3, 3ec40of0zi111.jpeg)

Not OC but here are some useful images for cultivating the emerging TransBol ideology



>all that blurring to obscure honface


File: 85a957ae89fcb66⋯.png (4.1 MB, 3541x3584, 3541:3584, Skyripper-1.png)


> jet plane made in 2009


File: 235b4cf9d5c19b5⋯.jpg (584.42 KB, 1080x1046, 540:523, Screenshot_20190116-162840….jpg)

Defend Western civilization


File: 01daed088770c5a⋯.jpg (15.13 KB, 335x315, 67:63, 1531346840029.jpg)




Imagine my shock.



nice, posada wave



File: f1fc3a4ee40e9e6⋯.gif (2.06 MB, 350x314, 175:157, 1428341602606.gif)


File: 47e2193d756d488⋯.jpg (148.87 KB, 506x552, 11:12, Rhodesians-never-die.jpg)

>Rhodieboos in a nutshell



>Rhodesians never die!

So where are they? :^)


File: a0423c389847023⋯.png (273.71 KB, 1864x789, 1864:789, rhodesia.png)



Mugabe may have been a reactionary who almost always went against communist advice but he really gets under reactionaries skin like nothing else



They're dead Dave



a*Glos can never do it right. They actually lost the Bush War on the ground, not only in the "hearts and minds" of the rural population. The protected villages concept that MACV tried to implement in Vietnam did not work in Rhodesia either, and they never could secure the Zambezi River border. Until the very end, there was a constant trickle of terrorists and weapons from the Zambian staging bases. Fireforce is all well and good, but they never had the numbers nor the coverage to hold the border.

They actually had a fighting chance at reaching a Western-amenable political solution by appointing the Bishop Muzorewa as a black puppet leader shortly after UDI, but Ian Smith waited too long and squandered any credibility and legitimacy that the Bishop might have had among the indigenous population.





>They actually lost the Bush War on the ground

Interesting, got any more information on this, as mostly what I know are the memes where the RLI suffered minimal casualties in battle while the rebels suffered hundreds, if not thousands



its replacing one program for another.. Or something


File: 4c053bfe88eda93⋯.gif (275.79 KB, 931x682, 931:682, 5233991004.gif)


File: c34e4dc7fd5a2ae⋯.png (91.41 KB, 800x840, 20:21, 946d6ab42fa22d37828bad772e….png)

What is he hatin' on, /leftypol/?


File: ae1c4a1512e900b⋯.png (439.09 KB, 800x840, 20:21, gang gang gang.png)



Needs more .jpg and fucked up text all over the place I think but as a minute shitpost i'm pretty happy


File: 2c9c5659dbdae02⋯.jpg (67.36 KB, 800x840, 20:21, c34e4dc7fd5a2ae882c7e00a5e….jpg)


File: 29dfd3a1e4c60f4⋯.jpg (26.87 KB, 385x512, 385:512, 4208782-06VWqXhc73NPcYcD.jpg)

>Here is Anmao/俺猫

>A catgirl based off of the Black Panther Party, because why not

>I was originally gonna give her black hair but nah.



File: cf5dce4f1ac7396⋯.png (141.26 KB, 800x840, 20:21, ancaps.png)


File: c6539d0a6dd3479⋯.jpg (54.25 KB, 680x591, 680:591, il-sungpepe.jpg)

File: 5eaf0f7d1e6cd3e⋯.png (834.49 KB, 584x1778, 292:889, retaliation.png)

Fresh memes hot off the presses. OC donut steel.


File: bb3b8c96af108a8⋯.png (5.12 MB, 2977x3694, 2977:3694, Confident 俺猫-1.png)

>Here's a confident Anmao

>Based off of the black Panther party

>Why not make her

>I was inspired by the other political catgirls so yeah

>I'll sleep now.



Oh right, I probably should've given her panther ears and curly hair. I dunno tbh.


File: f14d3d48483188a⋯.jpeg (32.47 KB, 480x692, 120:173, WhatsApp Image 2019-01-23….jpeg)

can someone skilled in photoshop and with at least some understanding of the current political climate in Brazil make a "virgin/chad" based on pic related?


File: 2fbbb230a652a20⋯.png (248.91 KB, 358x358, 1:1, SHUTTHEFUCKUPLIBERAL.png)







cute, but should wear a beret


File: c44874cfaca5e10⋯.png (289.43 KB, 397x397, 1:1, 7a1a20d.png)


File: fb34e1f383f7f54⋯.png (501.18 KB, 620x687, 620:687, ClipboardImage.png)

Template to use



Malcolm X being assassinated immediately after being de-idpoled and MLk being killed by the FBi during bis support for a strike and right before his organizing of the poor Peoples Camapign should be top middle somewhere, feds killing fred Hampton for his Rainbow Coalitiom should be mid-middle.


File: 2a033890e5a84b8⋯.png (236.24 KB, 554x554, 1:1, new_hoxhaist_pepe.png)

say hello to my le nouevlle pepe le hoxhaist xdd


You people realize that memes are illegal in countries like Communist China right? They couldn't even handle Xi been compared to Winnie the Pooh.

Everyone that posts memes is a secret porky and a reactionary.








these are good, we need more like this




What is it?



>Communist China

Pick one.


File: 25367835c950087⋯.png (1.47 MB, 620x687, 620:687, kimjongun2.png)


File: 1b57a981665b591⋯.png (5.86 MB, 5214x5216, 2607:2608, 803800_asykes_libiana.png)

>Here's Libiana

>A girl based off of Libya

>A Muslim world state

>also drew a tank for fun


File: 6ef27f93e206b24⋯.png (662.45 KB, 1920x816, 40:17, sketch-1548878627079.png)




whatever chinese propaganda bureau cooked up that meme did pretty well.

>Xi is a kind old bear that likes honey, fuckin gottem lmao



And give her an AK as well


Perfect meme for bait posts


Let's make this a banner!


> font is similar to that one

Unironically comic sans. The font in that meme is literally the comic sans style from Adobe Photoshop in the 2000s


Caption this (properly) to say

"US national debt" or "US military expenditure"

Or just remake the "Soviet Economy" thing but bigger.


File: 1cf9a278ff77b4b⋯.png (16.57 KB, 800x600, 4:3, counteranalyse.png)

File: b48d56fd34db8cb⋯.png (13.12 KB, 800x600, 4:3, counterattack.png)

File: 2acdcb59944cedd⋯.png (15.42 KB, 800x600, 4:3, delay.png)

File: 73a427270e232de⋯.png (12.09 KB, 800x600, 4:3, Evasion.png)

File: 22ad751a922b56f⋯.png (16.93 KB, 800x600, 4:3, stonewall.png)

r9 my autistic diagrams which I made out of boredom on a tuesday afternoon



I like this concept, I'm gonna upload your post to your /leftyweebpol/ thread.



The counter analyse trash and evasion shit is why arguing with rightists is so miserable.



>citizen courts



Ok that last point sounds like bullshit tbh



read the links


File: 6c4399f6afd1070⋯.jpg (22.53 KB, 217x245, 31:35, 1519502428029.jpg)


File: e62cd66711d5622⋯.jpg (12.91 KB, 200x309, 200:309, anna-louise-strong.jpg)



>So well known and effective is the Soviet method of remaking human beings that criminals occasionally now apply to be admitted. I met one such man in Gulin village. Notorious locally as a thief and drunkard, he had a dozen convictions to his discredit, till at last he went to the authorities saying: “I’m a man destroyed, but I want to be made over.” They sent him to a labor camp whence he returned a qualified worker. Bolshevo Commune, the most famous “cure” for criminals, can be entered only by application approved by the general meeting of members. It’s waiting list is so long that it accepts only the most hardened cases, priding itself on being able to make over persons who cannot become cured in any other institution. Its strength lies in its large membership of intelligent former criminals, who apply to new entrants their intimate knowledge of the criminal mind.

>Crime today is rapidly diminishing in the Soviet Union. From 1929 to 1934 sentences for murder decreased by 1/2 while sex crimes fell off to 1/4. The cause is found in the growing strength of the Soviet environment to remake human beings; the penal policy is only a supplementary force. A striking example of the play of both causes may be found in the figures of prostitution. Pre-war Moscow had 25,000 to 30,000 prostitutes; these sank by 1928 to about 3000, a diminution clearly due to economic causes.

Strong, Anna Louise. This Soviet World. New York, N. Y: H. Holt and company, c1936, p. 261


File: 364a0a459f77e19⋯.jpg (26.06 KB, 617x160, 617:160, meme.JPG)


Holy fuck, i never visit this thread and i just realized half of it it's fucking holodomor discussion, why didn't the mods damage control this shit?



The thing is, we did. But anti-communists really are this dedicated to shitting up this board.


File: a115a3c8c667f3c⋯.png (626.28 KB, 300x1647, 100:549, Marx is gonna say the n-wo….png)

Guess who's back


File: fb371e6f47a4b9c⋯.png (403.16 KB, 488x602, 244:301, gaddafi rip.png)

File: 31186d78781f23e⋯.jpg (119.41 KB, 640x480, 4:3, gaddafi chan.jpg)


>moon of islam also used in the CIA Republic's flag

>no true Libya flag or emblem



File: af1447679ac9ecf⋯.jpg (45.81 KB, 604x320, 151:80, hortle.jpg)



I would fuck tho


File: 30f8d9f02e1281d⋯.png (162.16 KB, 672x425, 672:425, marx joker.png)


Back again



an economy, for fucks sake.


File: c594c6d93269266⋯.png (2.44 MB, 1273x2545, 1273:2545, ClipboardImage.png)

This image needs to be remade but with actual effort.


File: 0060e4be39c8605⋯.png (336.03 KB, 640x640, 1:1, LENIN.png)

File: 48209eb83182a8b⋯.png (151.68 KB, 640x640, 1:1, STALIN.png)

I make dis


File: 74026c7832c128b⋯.png (1.2 MB, 1273x2545, 1273:2545, c594c6d932692660f3752de6d5….png)


USA PATRIOT Act intensifies


File: cb0c5b3d286e2fa⋯.png (24.52 KB, 255x143, 255:143, ClipboardImage.png)


Did anyone save this image? I can't find it in full size on either wayback or archive.is


File: 05b35b5aa10f3d6⋯.jpg (79.08 KB, 960x684, 80:57, DyVbQn1W0AAF1qK.jpg)


File: 37d34b3dc890d22⋯.png (3.05 MB, 2847x4096, 2847:4096, Black Pride.png)

Black Pride!

>Just wanted to make a drawing for black history month

>And because I'm a black girl

>black and proud of it



>American flag



File: 9f95836af6f6b8f⋯.jpg (78.22 KB, 563x719, 563:719, redpilled.jpg)




how about grandma's cakes bruh?



Lol, I don't remember the American flag being gay.



I think nobody like landlords.


Sorry anons, I'm in a goofy and giggly mood today.


File: 62d1cc24aad037c⋯.webm (10.15 MB, 320x240, 4:3, Jiang Zemin to Hong Kong ….webm)

File: e1a8538ad68d932⋯.jpg (61.8 KB, 850x400, 17:8, quote-you-are-very-familia….jpg)

File: 02917f92f3c4c85⋯.jpg (158.13 KB, 711x576, 79:64, too simple too young.jpg)

File: a2537ddac90e60b⋯.png (296.49 KB, 602x339, 602:339, main-qimg-43f03a304c104cb4….png)

File: ece739ae761469d⋯.jpg (135.77 KB, 602x614, 301:307, main-qimg-42d7aa6e06c640d4….jpg)


File: 0689b8c567fe654⋯.jpg (64.04 KB, 600x750, 4:5, blessed.jpg)


File: 803b279faaef1d9⋯.jpg (192.55 KB, 1024x500, 256:125, christcom2.jpg)


File: 755cf67d675dc3c⋯.webm (13.82 MB, 624x352, 39:22, Doug Stanhope on national….webm)

just made this


File: 46ae0fd2bbb9ba2⋯.jpg (70.7 KB, 720x720, 1:1, FB_IMG_1549537954082.jpg)

American Political Discourse


File: 30d18f828873f24⋯.gif (2.84 MB, 1000x420, 50:21, polyus.gif)

Created this GIF just now for a post on 4/k/ regarding the Soviet Polyus laser-satellite.


File: 9293e1c526178f1⋯.jpg (115.49 KB, 400x322, 200:161, IWW Graffiti spooky.jpg)

Spooky enough, or naw?


File: ba2793dc2353526⋯.jpg (202.66 KB, 2048x1152, 16:9, Marxforpoopooheads.jpg)

Fresh OwlTurdComix



Link to post?


File: 43980da1c93596e⋯.png (473.47 KB, 1162x858, 581:429, ideologymemes.png)

I made a useful infographic explaining the differences between right- and left-wing memes.



too many words

the feces was really unnecessary



Subversive, fellow traveller



What words do you dislike comrade? The feces are necessary.


File: 06181d4a3e3ee11⋯.png (262.22 KB, 636x960, 53:80, violent revolution power r….png)



That edit idea is old as balls



holy fuck this comic is based and redpilled


File: c9cd519fceb52fb⋯.png (358.51 KB, 1536x996, 128:83, ideologymemes2.png)

File: f763c1cce72c036⋯.jpg (890.94 KB, 2000x2000, 1:1, b5GGMj3.jpg)

File: 3883629d00758d0⋯.png (185.02 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, gadsenbird.png)

File: 0d5efaa0ff69f68⋯.jpg (7.17 KB, 269x187, 269:187, images.jpg)

File: 88b2d2670a29f46⋯.jpg (107.97 KB, 500x613, 500:613, secretarybirdsmall.jpg)

New version and two memes based on the fact that the secretary bird kicks the shit out of snakes



Ah, it was just a no-reply shitpost that's in an archived thread.




File: a72acbe0313d91b⋯.png (235.36 KB, 636x960, 53:80, porknose.png)


We know who this guy is.



Tbh, most right-wing "memes" I've seen are post-ironic, too. Even moreso, really. Right-wingers cannot actually seem to understand irony. They're like women, it's pathetic.



>women can't understand irony

I can't say this is true for most of my female friends. out of curiosity, is your sense of irony imageboard meme references? does your core group of friends include girls? if not, how often do you hang out with your female friends? are you a burger?



Right-winger detected!



If they don't understand irony wouldn't they be pre-ironic?



>forgetting Wales




Blyat, that's a shame



The Welsh Union has capitulated


File: 96d24351ec7ae95⋯.png (1.32 MB, 2255x2661, 2255:2661, Germia Nazz.png)

>Here is Germia Nazz.

>A girl based off of nazi Germany and it's flag for the color palette.

>I think I did good with this one.

>Used the opposite angle for this one





File: b47cb18f8524d39⋯.png (82.28 KB, 1500x500, 3:1, clown-world-comic1.png)

New stonetoss comic if anyone wants to edit it



Clowns are bimbofying our children.



I wonder if he had a fear of clowns when he was a kid


File: 550515d1fa3e27b⋯.png (170.51 KB, 1500x500, 3:1, b47cb18f8524d398bec0938da8….png)






The clown has a pedo code symbol on his pants. I think the creator is trying to insinuate that all clowns are pedophiles and need to be genocided.



File: d2df9c6d54d5058⋯.jpg (203.56 KB, 843x1280, 843:1280, 1550029508.cupcakekitty179….jpg)

>Luika The Wasp.

>Made this with one pen and a few markers and a white marker.

>always protects the hive from any kind of threat.

>Has three wings due to a birth defect.



I mean, I wouldn't be shocked if pedos are posing as clowns but hm.


File: 38a9447004d4b69⋯.png (3.09 MB, 2936x4096, 367:512, Pink Anarchist-1.png)

>Pink Anarchist

>Supports the rights for LGBT individuals

>Condemns homophobia, etc

>Also condemns pedos posing as MAPs.

Posted this on a wrong thread.


File: 2129144bc1a27ce⋯.jpg (65.33 KB, 640x721, 640:721, snph6g2te6g21.jpg)


File: a77113972535e3b⋯.png (42.16 KB, 318x237, 106:79, Sabotabby.png)

R8 please



cute :3. How about antgirl?


File: 50e232990ca26fa⋯.jpeg (99.22 KB, 600x600, 1:1, C8F14BF0-BA21-443B-A1B0-8….jpeg)


File: d4347d64cbc4cf7⋯.jpg (189.2 KB, 500x694, 250:347, declarepresidency.jpg)

i made this meme in 20 minutes with Photoshop pls no bully



Okay but what the FUCK did he mean by this


File: 5ad6a91caaee4b1⋯.jpg (816.77 KB, 1800x1376, 225:172, ocasio_cortez_bar.jpg)

this has potential



>Reason and logic liqueur

So does this mean that Benny boy thinks AOC is actually reasonable and logical?




So Benny can make a good pun if he wants.


File: 8d6f0b300aeb99c⋯.png (694.95 KB, 1381x442, 1381:442, clownworld2.png)


Don't know why I bothered.

This is so unfunny to begin with that it kind of defeats itself.



Call this one "The Origin of Stonetoss" btw.



Wait, really?




Oh yeah, Antgirl. Antgirl would probably be a friend of Luika even though Antgirl is a proud fascist, since I don't think ants bother wasps at all I don't think.

Luika would probably be a communist in all honesty.



I also drew antgirl with one pen and some markers as well.



Iike this meme.



Yeah, he got raped by Nazi clowns and that's why he be like that.


File: bc0eaf7acd530aa⋯.jpg (71.14 KB, 600x500, 6:5, freeaintfree2.jpg)



That still sounds like some weird right-wing fanfic.


File: 50e111d236709fd⋯.png (1.81 MB, 1932x3550, 966:1775, Teal Anarchist.png)

Teal Anarchist

>Was figuring out if I could make her green or teal, so I ended editing her hair color and cloths to look teal instead

>Just finished this drawing today.

>Should've added "Me and only me" in the background.



>stalin stale ale




File: e472c8514f1c0f5⋯.png (64.99 KB, 1798x848, 899:424, commiedoomer1.png)

I made this commie doomer weeks ago and I don't know what to put so here's the template.


File: d1be719832e1206⋯.png (170.94 KB, 680x680, 1:1, commiedoomer.png)



>ruins friendship with REDpills

>Lost youth


>reads books daily to stay sane

>follows stock market to watch collapse

>goes on rants

>no social media

holy fuck this one is on the mark



this is almost 1:1, nice


File: 5ec39ee18aaade6⋯.png (171.49 KB, 680x680, 1:1, commiedoomer.png)


I had to fix his headphones, they weren't connected to anything.



I'd go to this bar tbh



no need to get personal mate.


File: 3bfb0a27e657f55⋯.png (804.21 KB, 1688x873, 1688:873, ben shapiro final draft.png)

File: c843eaaa64dea65⋯.png (694.57 KB, 1688x873, 1688:873, chopy boi.png)

File: 338f1e3bb8c0cb1⋯.png (942.31 KB, 1688x873, 1688:873, nazi furry.png)

File: 11105c5022bb55b⋯.png (1.24 MB, 1688x873, 1688:873, incel.png)

File: 96f37d472c75d11⋯.png (990.32 KB, 1688x873, 1688:873, mike pence.png)

OC of mine. Not really sure where to have even posted these. Hope you like.


File: 35617f84437a791⋯.png (84.98 KB, 500x499, 500:499, the-24-year-old-radical-un….png)



love it


File: e80957a4f506b5d⋯.png (206.61 KB, 928x666, 464:333, ahoy.png)


File: 4a58355c6eade4b⋯.png (180.36 KB, 480x360, 4:3, muh_meme.png)

anti glasses and nasserist tbh.




Man, I wish I had a radical unionist friend



do you have a separate pic of the chinese cartoon chick on the bottom?


File: aa7a32bc4484bae⋯.jpg (33.71 KB, 219x521, 219:521, dovberborochov.jpg)


Three panel meme idea:

1. Nazi in /leftpol/ either hanging out normally with the rest of the board or hiding in plain sight like a nazbol that actually just wants to redpill the board into actual nazism.

2. Nazi in /leftypol/ is called out on his shit almost instantly and shitposts for a lack of arguments.

3. Nazi in /marx/ getting his ass fucked or one of those soviet propaganda of killing fascists.




Not quite.

between 1928 and 1934 there were 7 million estimated deaths due to famine from the Great Depression. 80% of farm property was lost, this was called de-farming. US farmers, seeking to produce as much as possible to keep up with their bank payments over-used the land and created dustbowls, that left them without food or money, then banks would force them off the land, trying to collect money all the more aggressively to stave off their inevitable bankruptcy. Many people starved to death or died. People sold their children as indentured servants (a nice way of saying slave) to get enough money to survive. Except that unlike the USSR, they didn't have a blockade on them, and had an established industrial economy. The USA was a major economic power in the world, the USSR, in 1932 was not, yet somehow capitalist USA dropped to the same crisis conditions as one in an unestablished country.

Also there are always hungry and starving people in the USA with over 1/10 of the population struggling off of food stamps.





It was just due to the continuation of mortality trends from the 1920s. Life expectancy in the USSR rose dramatically in its first 3 decades… INCLUDING during the 1932 famine. Does that mean that people didn't starve? No.

Statistics show no significant increase in mortality rates, in either the USA or the USSR… the reason being both the 7 million that I cited above, and the X millions claimed about the Famine of 1932 was calculated through rounding the deaths per year and predicted mising of birthes by birth rate. Or in other words, anyone who died in the period, regardless of whether it was of old age or disease and the supposed number of people who weren't born is how these numbers are acquired.

Yes, suicide rates and homocide rates were what primarily rose during the great depression. BUT It's quite reasonable that lack of food caused this increase. The question is literally, "How many starved to death?", but if it was intended to be, "How many died due to lack of food?", it would have to look into the causes of those suicides. Both because suicide and depression can be causally linked to hunger, but also because people know starving to death is unpleasant and for some, suicide might be preferable if they know they are out of food, or maybe Grandpa deciding to stop being a mouth to feed so the rest of the family can make it through and survive



>expectancy in the USSR rose dramatically in its first 3 decades… INCLUDING during the 1932 famine

What's your source for this? I couldn't easily find it.

>the reason being both the 7 million that I cited above, and the X millions claimed about the Famine of 1932 was calculated through rounding the deaths per year and predicted mising of birthes by birth rate

This was argued against in the previous section of the thread.

>"No, it's not. Leaving aside the fact that these were different organisations in different countries, nobody was simply guessing in the USSR. The infamous 'Kurman gap' of 8m in the 1937 Soviet census wasn't a simple guess or unfavourable comparison to predictions. What the census takers discovered was that the product of the registered number of births and the registered number of deaths did not match the actual population total. Their conclusion being that there must be 8m unregistered deaths somewhere (which they tried, and failed, to handwave away with various crude modifiers)

>In contrast, there is no such hole in the US census. The figures simply add up in a way that the Soviet ones didn't. There is no missing 7-10 million US citizens who have supposedly vanished off the books

>As far as I can make out, this joker Borisov seems to have started from the assumption that the "previous demographic tendency was preserved" throughout the Depression, ie that the birth rate remained constant. Not only is this baseless, it's nonsense - we know that the fertility rate fell during this decade. But by using this false assumption our friend Boris has suddenly conjured into existence an extra 7-10m people who never existed in the first place. No wonder their disappearance left no traces"

In any case, the USA seems to have much better records and thus methodology for revealing actual death rates, even if the death rates in the USSR were inaccurate in the way that you claim. There'd be no reason, except as a reproach against the methodologies for the USSR, to use the same methodology for the USA.



> the USA seems to have much better records and thus methodology for revealing actual death rates, even if the death rates in the USSR were inaccurate in the way that you claim. There'd be no reason, except as a reproach against the methodologies for the USSR, to use the same methodology for the USA.


>What's your source for this?



File: 752a83f8eafa4ad⋯.png (149.36 KB, 1080x1091, 1080:1091, 752a83f8eafa4ad0e4a30e2659….png)

cursed image



Your source doesn't seem to include any data before 1938. Could you quote the section of the article that references data that includes 1932? Or if that article does not contain data encompassing 1932 link an article that does contain 1932? I already knew that life expectancy rose in general across the USSR throughout its history, just not that Ukrainian life expectancy rose when it had a famine.


Do you have a response to what ComradeOm wrote (and I quoted)? Is your response that the gap was somehow caused by errors in reporting the birthrate (i.e. over-representing births in the statistics) rather than by errors in the death-rate?


File: 43942d82e181e5e⋯.png (70.03 KB, 733x478, 733:478, ClipboardImage.png)


> Is your response that the gap was somehow caused by errors in reporting the birthrate (i.e. over-representing births in the statistics) rather than by errors in the death-rate?

The point is that the 7 million number in the USA is found through methods similar to how people like Conquest got 6-8 million dead Ukrainians - statistical manipulation along with speculation.

The source I used isn't available online anymore, so I'll retell the basics, essentially the populations in Ukraine didn't rise but dropped slightly during the famine, however the main reasons for this were

A) Populations moving

B) Deaths due to sickness (there were typhus and Dysentry epidemics)

C) Lower birth rates due to less food (thus less people allowing themselves to get pregnant. However in all aspects of life outside the actual famine, things were improving. And over-all in the USSR population was still growing and living quality improving, thus life expectancy along with it.

Leaving aside crisis years, between 1927 and 1964 Ukraine experienced considerable improvement in life expectancy – up 24.8 years for males and 27.5 years for females. The improvement, in fact, was so significant that, by the mid-1960s, Ukrainian life expectancy had reached the level of the most advanced countries. In 1964, life expectancy for males/females in Ukraine was 68.1/74.4, which was higher than in Japan (67.6/72.8) and the US (66.8/73.7) (World Bank, WDI).

Source: F. Meslé and J. Vallin (2003) for 1927-1991, State Statistics Committee of Ukraine for 1992-2013

As the infographic shows, there was a dip in 1932, however this dip was for 1 year and was almost instantly rose back up within the 1932-34 period.

I think there may be graphs on leftybooru, but at this moment I have a stack of papers to write so I suggest you try and do some research yourself if this is not enough.



I'm pretty skeptical that the famine wasn't extreme, but I'll do some research later, yeah (I've also got papers).

>Deaths due to sickness

I don't really have a problem with the idea that deaths due to sickness can be attributed to famine. Obviously you can't count all of the deaths due to disease due to famine, but deaths above the norm (i.e. the deaths you are talking about) aren't necessarily out of consideration.

>Lower birth rates due to less food

As I was saying, it would seem like this explanation would require for the government to have over-reported births (if it explains the Kurman gap) I don't know how it would have unintentionally done this or why it would have intentionally done this.

<continuously talking about how the USSR is good

I have no extreme disdain for the USSR, the things you have said just seem a bit crank-ish (especially how you did not initially state that the 7 million american deaths was just a "by your logic/methodology", but rather seemed to imply that it actually happened)

I've been thinking of starting by readingThe Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture 1931-1933 (it says the famine wasn't a genocide but killed roughly 6 million in mostly Ukraine and Kazakhstan), any thoughts or warnings on it?


File: 00cc2cce1b1492d⋯.png (313.63 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, 326e59be0c7e398a4faabae04b….png)


here ya anon


File: b8678482b195d31⋯.png (499.95 KB, 1200x600, 2:1, Me in socio-politics discu….png)


>you did not initially state that the 7 million american deaths was just a "by your logic/methodology"

Because its blatantly fucking obvious in the sources posted that this is achieved through the same fraudulent methodology used to find deaths during the 1932 famine in Ukraine. I sort of assumed that repeating the obvious isn't necessary.

>starting by reading The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture 1931-1933

That's a good idea. No caveats, the only one I guess is that Wheatcroft isn't pro-soviet but as his works are objective there isn't much to say.

>continuously talking about how the USSR is good

Because it's an argument with right-wing twat, if we were discussing the USSR's good and bad sides then it would be a different discussion, pic related.

For a detailed analysis of the 1932 famine over-all I suggest starting with link related, and then reading the sources; https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1109532





File: f5214b3e82d6c87⋯.png (462.5 KB, 2760x1818, 460:303, tankiedoomer.png)

here's my piece of shit version. Feel free to edit it if you want to.


File: 018fff9f8f1d976⋯.jpg (108.58 KB, 1080x1080, 1:1, 841723_asykes_weaponized-t….jpg)

"Weaponized Tinnah"

>Tinnah wearing camo and holding weapons.

>Tinnah has zero trust towards humans ever since her and her friends escaped and defeated the circus host.



File: 6001caf4e5eef3e⋯.jpg (222.05 KB, 3273x1528, 3273:1528, virgintranny.jpg)


NazBol traps > Asser trannies


File: db30f3fb6fb3253⋯.png (948.14 KB, 1920x1020, 32:17, ClipboardImage.png)

We need a socialist edit


File: 8c0ec604f19dfe3⋯.png (117.19 KB, 1299x1494, 433:498, ClipboardImage.png)


pic related is a better template IMO, just put a NKVD hat instead of the cowboy hat



Thanks a lot anon!


File: bb92742d227d107⋯.jpg (112.92 KB, 530x901, 10:17, milk.jpg)


this exists



seize the means of working class reproduction.


File: 0e8f0f2eee8bf6f⋯.jpg (58.44 KB, 955x960, 191:192, it's so big isn't it.jpg)


true but that's a different position and more edits are always fun.


File: 4a45912aba4cb9f⋯.png (251.7 KB, 1200x837, 400:279, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 18f535883057009⋯.png (1.17 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, ClipboardImage.png)

Can anyone do a color for pic 1? Pic 2 is a reference if you don't want to use actual MiG-15s and F-86s for reference. Feel free to make a background.


File: 865beb36da08a1e⋯.jpg (162.07 KB, 1112x482, 556:241, virginreformist.jpg)


File: 09dd44fd7a175c1⋯.jpg (228.05 KB, 2047x819, 2047:819, VkUU4RO.jpg)



I mean the bolsheviks and the workers in Russia were probably starving and malnourished so i guess ur wrong stupid dumbo



>be in Africa


>nothing changes

Multiple factors act upon things and it's not a good look to be fucking over workers



Nechayev though.



Depressed means starving now?


File: 762fb9d75c29a6d⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 817.66 KB, 893x1200, 893:1200, usa futa 2.png)

File: 5b021f654a88705⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 819.46 KB, 893x1200, 893:1200, usa futa 2 example.png)

Can Someone write (and edit on), something about US imperialist foreign policy on the penis? Picture 2 is a 'sort of' example of the idea.



Ok I created another OC thread on /leftyb/ for lewd and other content. Please post there as well as here. Inb4 pointless/spam /leftypol/ is technically SFW so NSFW requests are often spoilered and generally ignored except for comedic shit-posting so that's why I created another one.



File: df178a6b12065ba⋯.jpg (103.98 KB, 750x1334, 375:667, D1RTDD4XgAAOPVW.jpg:large.jpg)


File: 3c56494eb391617⋯.png (154.41 KB, 539x761, 539:761, slepe stalin.png)

have a fresh edit lads


Quick question, hope you don't mind: were the OC before the cycle "ends" were saved? Would be a big shame if it wasn't

Also I had a few OCs but was baleted in /leftpol/



We should have a board or site where we store OC, memes, any leftist media and resources



General leftist media and resources, a storage where you can easily access it


File: 76161010c45e0fb⋯.png (4.44 MB, 2013x4096, 2013:4096, Nassine.png)



>supports a contradictory ideology

>also loves reading fascist books

>and likes wearing yellow, black and sometimes grey

>hates bright pink girly stuff.




Dude, leftybooru exists.



Yeah, but it's not active and it's not site where you store resources there. leftybooru is an image archive site


File: 1c201c2027e186f⋯.png (820.62 KB, 893x1200, 893:1200, usa_futa_3.png)


I tried



looks really nice, would suck it dry



thanks anon


File: c1e8767f3cc7e59⋯.jpg (216.14 KB, 525x813, 175:271, WoodyGuthrie_525.jpg)

Posting OC then tucking in anons.


what do you guys think of the philosophers meme mk24 on instagram.

the dude seems to be somewhat based but with liberal tendencies.

i am pretty sure he lurks here


File: 48fa8ffcd29ad51⋯.png (2.77 MB, 2717x3642, 2717:3642, Sazirrah.png)


>A socialist girl who was born in Bootstring in 1998. She always wished Bootstring was a socialist city.

>Just wanted to make another Socialist drawing.



This is below ZUN tier. Figure out pose and proportions first before you throw colors at it. Shading can't fix big mistakes. Make photos of yourself in poses you want to draw for reference and work with that.



File: 55c2baf8d6bdd89⋯.jpg (59.6 KB, 480x480, 1:1, 46355300_1864608303666276_….jpg)

For Chapo



why do you make it look attractive though



I'll definitely do that more.



>What is done is done, there is only forwards

>A man is the sum of his actions

Feel like these two statements are contradictory in essence



>Feel like these two statements are contradictory in essence

Once you make those dumb actions you ignore them and move forward while incorporating what you've learned.




Pose is fine TBH, the head and neck is the problem.



I agree, the head and neck looks a little off.



Also what I meant is that it should be more mainstream and known by the public, not obscure and hiding in some corner


File: 3e627f0b7c17bbb⋯.png (720.44 KB, 540x960, 9:16, Screenshot_2019-03-17-22-2….png)

Was the situationalist internationale leftcom? Here's my situ-leftcom cat yuri please enjoy its my only pleasure in macroecon lectures (extremely painful)


File: 26fe475a84ffdc9⋯.png (13.13 KB, 255x255, 1:1, e9f02eb029002f8ea00ff29849….png)


Really good shit anon


File: ac6a7d4851a2ce1⋯.png (47.78 KB, 1187x823, 1187:823, AJcomic.png)

i made some garbage strawman comic



Ayy, that's really nice!



Doesn't seem that different aside from better looking font



Kinda reminds me of mine, it even has copypasted panels

May not be that obvious, but it's pretty obvious to me






>Pose is fine

Nobody holds a flag like that unless they are five minutes away from dying of AIDS.


File: aa25624a06b9947⋯.png (140.9 KB, 721x590, 721:590, 5466574..PNG)

I'm just gonna leave this here, if someone wants to use it.






lol the climate change part doesn't really fit there, i don't know about islamists fundamentalists but some white supremacists like to say climate change exists but it's only whites who are trying to combat it.


File: 135fad298b6bfaf⋯.png (135.8 KB, 710x558, 355:279, 465968.PNG)


I just eliminated that.



Are fundamental islamists really against capitalism? or so they claim?



I mean, I think.

Even then, I don't really know how was the economic basis of the Islamic State, to put an example, if they had some type of capitalism going on or just resorted to loot from the civilians and the goverment.

Even then, if we saw an actual state led by this people, how much would the economy change, from one that's based in capitalism?




dude have you read anything about islam that isn't a sam harris or a cnn article?

islam is similar to Christianity in terms of the like a thousand schools of thought.

fundamental islam based only on the quran is actually a lot moderate than even some self proclaimed "moderates". it doesn't require hijab (it only says decency of both females and males) it only directly allows killing in form of self defense and it doesn't require the killing only forbids homosexuality, adultery, fornication, indecency, etc

there was a caliph who literally replaced all of his harem for a trap (a man who looked feminine) and he wrote poems about how he is mind taking and how traps are more good at it, dangerous and deceiving than woman.


File: c2da4e1f42f4529⋯.png (68.89 KB, 867x653, 867:653, 563146546.PNG)


Ok how about this.



>deny climate change


also isis claims to want to revive the golden age of islam similar to how poltards want to revive western culture "golden age"

you should probably replace the cultures integrating ones with the fact that both reject all other cultures and view them as inferior

overall good one just change the correction language or disable it because those red line are ruining it



which one is yours?


File: f04734f90985e87⋯.png (260.11 KB, 722x909, 722:909, Definitive edition.PNG)


File: 34a2960ea171e51⋯.png (1.19 MB, 1438x1146, 719:573, patchy venom.png)

Why isn't anyone making pirate gang memes? Where is the pirate OC? Pirates were ancom illegalists.


File: ab6485ca22160d5⋯.jpg (2.04 MB, 4904x3324, 1226:831, syria roman salute.jpg)

File: 34214eb559ef272⋯.jpg (64.38 KB, 876x493, 876:493, hezbollah 0.jpg)

File: e47c9319ac2b940⋯.jpg (86.37 KB, 958x634, 479:317, pflp salute.jpg)

File: 1238711e599d263⋯.jpg (102.12 KB, 960x540, 16:9, pflp salute 2.jpg)

File: 8f478e70f5c9692⋯.jpg (1017.72 KB, 3504x2336, 3:2, j0eOcPXJaSr0Av1OcLvUWXiejV….jpg)


>Nazi salute

It is not associated with Nazis in that region. The SAA does it, Hezbollah does it, even the PFLP does it.




>backed by US intelligence



File: 5214a881405b9ea⋯.png (1.71 MB, 2000x1340, 100:67, redflag.png)

Not an anime girl


File: 6ef6a5859532383⋯.jpg (49.68 KB, 960x756, 80:63, C0NzuosXcAA-UhR.jpg-large.jpg)


pflpfag here, has nothing to do with nazis in the middle east just like how flicking the bird doesnt mean anything here either. we are marxists



>Nobody holds a flag like that unless they are five minutes away from dying of AIDS.

How does that make any sense you dopy ass.



I just put the words another anon supplied the pic



I thought the PFLP were wiped out? I also wonder, what's the deal between the regular PFLP and the PFLP-GC, did Hafez al-Assad try to take over the PLO and turn it into an arm of the Syrian state or is that just a lie from butthurt LNM guys?


File: 4811595ddf73825⋯.png (220.03 KB, 500x468, 125:117, omegle-talk-to-strangers-y….png)

File: f84f76c2ff88bdb⋯.jpg (53.57 KB, 752x501, 752:501, 9qz25i3hopk21.jpg)

File: 89c2ba5c11da6b8⋯.jpg (27.66 KB, 445x442, 445:442, t23ekukpbpm21.jpg)


IRA memes in low supply


File: cc6b7eaa7fe6625⋯.jpg (494.49 KB, 946x1360, 473:680, MARXsweep.jpg)

File: c23e4f75da191bc⋯.png (472.3 KB, 640x640, 1:1, porkyseason.png)

File: 5d2056d74b8447c⋯.png (13.59 KB, 1152x256, 9:2, hammerandsickleminecraftre….png)

File: c23e4f75da191bc⋯.png (472.3 KB, 640x640, 1:1, porkyseason.png)

File: 238c2ba534d0af0⋯.png (185.64 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, gadsenbird2.png)

Can someone add something interesting for Marx to be sweeping away? I want him to be cleaning the fascist filth or something but don't have any ideas.

And we need an official Minecraft hammer and sickle. You know, for revolting gamers. Here are a few variations but I can't decide which one works best.



Fuck, I posted porky season twice.


File: 2250507baec8da3⋯.jpg (37.95 KB, 392x315, 56:45, thinkingmushroom.jpg)

New meme. I made it.


File: 6ef6a5859532383⋯.jpg (49.68 KB, 960x756, 80:63, you both love guns.jpg)


File: 7bf95d6b2d4e6a2⋯.jpg (108.62 KB, 640x640, 1:1, 0k7m3yjgz7k21.jpg)


Not an OC but found on Redbubble somehow


File: 8b605d0c0ec902b⋯.png (75.49 KB, 844x470, 422:235, b62d94b251768346bd8378855d….png)

The comments on yellow vest videos can be extremely entertaining


File: a1f0ed1cd5697dd⋯.png (1.71 MB, 1964x3426, 982:1713, Nk-821.png)


>North Korean Tankgirl

>friends with Rb-33 Dancer

>Always patriotic to her home country

>fellow communist


I'm confused about the stance of /leftypol/.

Do you guys think Jews run everything like regular /pol/?



We believe classes are an obsolute tool in society, rich and unemployed people included, we believe everyone should work and wealth hoarding shouldn't be a thing to the point 10% of a country's population own the majority of its wealth. Jewish, white or black, the existence of the rich is not something we approve of.





File: 1d3b37ba76aa7f1⋯.png (19.84 KB, 501x677, 501:677, 1d3b37ba76aa7f19ad7df9fb11….png)


Yes we absolutely do my sassanach friend. The Jews are the ennemy AND NO ONE ELSE!



Unlike fascists, we don't deem people worthy/unworthy over such stupid things. There's a night and day difference between blaming societal problems on the rich vs on a general group of people. The rich can be anybody, and you can hate them indiscriminately. Hating Jews/blacks/Muslims indiscriminately is idiotic and backwards.


File: 83b1b4187194e1c⋯.webm (3.97 MB, 648x360, 9:5, fixed.webm)


I made this enjoyable for here



thanks compadre



i don't hate jews as a race, i hate zionists and cappie jews which is like majority of jews but i am against the holocaust because it only targeted innocent workers class jews for the most part while leaving the bankers and high class ones alive, even bringing them close to the state.

also you have all these unironic nazbols here who think jews stole their aryan trad wife




Have you ever held a flag like that?



Me personally? No, Other people? Yes.


File: 2f467bb7862fc02⋯.png (177.69 KB, 622x589, 622:589, guillotine3.png)

File: 6cdb84aed9b4916⋯.png (531.9 KB, 2218x2167, 2218:2167, BE GAY-1.png)


File: d486a1586968c39⋯.png (732.89 KB, 1062x1167, 354:389, thankyouforyourservice.png)



I never held a flag, and I probably would hold it against my shoulder.



I am a dopy ass tbh.


File: 9405de3313222c2⋯.jpg (178.6 KB, 1125x2001, 375:667, f6aGZRc.jpg)

File: fd4c37772a29d79⋯.jpg (13.66 KB, 255x191, 255:191, b006ba0ad5dd2aadb47baeda02….jpg)

Can somebody edit second pic in a similar fashion to the first? Gimp breaks my PC for some reason


File: 13f099ae1d2e2eb⋯.jpg (66.84 KB, 640x620, 32:31, D26-oOGX0AEcC46.jpg:large.jpg)



where do you make these in?


File: ba1015a901748d8⋯.png (4.22 MB, 1734x1220, 867:610, ClipboardImage.png)

File: f81cb06b437371b⋯.png (76.69 KB, 980x1024, 245:256, ClipboardImage.png)

File: c9454cafffa2e8b⋯.png (947.21 KB, 1200x1420, 60:71, ClipboardImage.png)

File: b5b3e01a5a4a49a⋯.jpg (240.75 KB, 2000x2000, 1:1, interkosmos.jpg)

can the NASA symbol be replaced for based interkosmos?


File: 84bec27dee06750⋯.png (654.42 KB, 980x1024, 245:256, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1a16690b9cd9a6f⋯.png (1.76 MB, 1200x1420, 60:71, ClipboardImage.png)


2 images failed to load, as usual.


File: f610a30867b9cfb⋯.jpg (350.17 KB, 1075x2048, 1075:2048, 56400380_10156782956359340….jpg)

Could some anon edit this to have it say: Despite my appearance i am constantly worried, We live in a dying world being eaten away by the rich, Yet people seem to not want to fight for their survival against them.



hows this?


File: a477d6095bd4f93⋯.png (2.98 MB, 1075x2048, 1075:2048, 018747482819190.png)



minor adjustment, had a misplaced comma.


File: ccfed1c6cb3748f⋯.png (3.9 MB, 1734x1220, 867:610, e32a1b48f2cef742.png)

File: d2ee31b7249cedc⋯.png (582.95 KB, 980x1024, 245:256, 87dee067b5131e1e1955f6815e.png)

File: d8c83400b9ccf8d⋯.png (1.57 MB, 1200x1420, 60:71, 1748399173739101.png)



oof, first one didnt come out so good. i dont think i have a tool that can warp the emblem around her breasts.



>first one didnt come out so good

That's alright, your efforts are still good.



thanks anon.



I made these with Ibispaint on my phone using a stylus. Samsung note 8.



who said that Anon?


File: 2867b184064da51⋯.jpg (985.25 KB, 1400x929, 1400:929, leftypol on Marx.jpg)



File: 87f59e0179171f8⋯.png (836.86 KB, 1325x829, 1325:829, ClipboardImage.png)


File: fa798ccaa9585bb⋯.jpg (7.93 KB, 275x183, 275:183, download.jpg)




Good shit


I'm doing a different pic now, but how the fuck do I convert GIMP files to .png?




Somebody made a banner with pic 1, can they post it here?



>I'm doing a different pic now, but how the fuck do I convert GIMP files to .png?

File - Export as - select png as format - click export


File: 1c2a89740dc5532⋯.mp4 (Spoiler Image, 1.71 MB, 640x360, 16:9, AmazonBlimp.mp4)

This is what Nick Land actually believes


File: 92f09591e5415df⋯.png (812.34 KB, 793x753, 793:753, ClipboardImage.png)




File: 5f1e9684983419c⋯.png (1.19 MB, 1060x824, 265:206, 155466976491305272.png)

Here's the pic since i'm a dopy ass who cant find the font in most vaporwave



Pics from a Gilets Juanes anon btw .



good job, i like that


File: 3387128a1da4112⋯.png (305.03 KB, 640x466, 320:233, You are not immune to ideo….png)

File: 46730e0c3ff0a74⋯.png (79.54 KB, 183x239, 183:239, Zizek.png)

File: ec3b176b0474e64⋯.png (18.58 KB, 254x36, 127:18, Ideology.png)

File: 47a89cf6e118bb2⋯.png (120.86 KB, 640x466, 320:233, Blank2.png)

Here's my OC. I will appreciate it if someone made it in better quality.



*better quality from scratch.


I've always thought a meme where Steven Pinker is talking about how the standard of living increased a ton after the Soviets were in power would be good. I have no idea how you'd make it though. I was thinking of just having him in front of a graph showing something like life expectancy increasing or child mortality decreasing when Russia was still the USSR. I don't really know what to make him say though or where I could find a graph like that.



this is great. What is interkosmos and do you do commissions?


File: c263df2b320b42c⋯.jpg (138.21 KB, 900x675, 4:3, blessedimage.jpg)


File: b5663e401195036⋯.jpg (26.77 KB, 165x225, 11:15, Bill_haywood_headshot.jpg)

>when you spot a succdem


File: e5085b314228c58⋯.png (948.36 KB, 800x714, 400:357, readingrainbowlevar_custom….png)


File: ebb0a138f075dd0⋯.jpg (121.5 KB, 922x786, 461:393, vn6qjvhvcfr21.jpg)

I picked it up from reddit but it's unironically good



F. It's called the little red book for a reason.


File: 215c0edbf9d3f76⋯.png (466.35 KB, 920x1140, 46:57, Nazi.png)

File: 63739166fa0b5fb⋯.png (218.05 KB, 2516x1176, 629:294, nazzz.png)


File: e9cfb59fad75413⋯.png (93.8 KB, 540x516, 45:43, engels letter 1887 04 26.png)


What did Engels mean by this?



he was happy affirmative action gave that nigger a degree in botanical gardens

[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / choroy / dempart / jenny / leftpol / magali / mde / mewch / strek ]