it's something to consider, but i'll go ahead and define some basic Nietzschean terms for you if want to start reading into it
>Active vs. Passive Nihilism
a lot of Nietzsche’s concepts center around nihilism, but he makes a distinction between two types of nihilism. Both start from the premise that there is no extrinsically-defined value to existence – there is no real meaning to life. Passive nihilism is when we accept that there is no meaning to life, we resign ourselves to that fact and become devoid of emotion, etc. However, with active nihilism, when we accept that there is no meaning to life we then create our own values – we become gods to fulfill the space left open by the death of God.
>the Will to Power
The Will to Power is the drive towards attaining a higher position in life or becoming stronger. This, according to Nietzsche, is the driving factor in life that controls our decisions – at the core, our root desire is to become more powerful. This can be a positive force or a negative force – the Will to Order can sometimes manifest from the Will to Power.
>the Will to Order/Truth
Essentially, the Will to Order is the drive to control the world around us and to eliminate suffering – this is a phenomenon that generates ressentiment.
>the Real World/Apparent World
The Real World is perfect, with no suffering whatsoever, while the Apparent world is imperfect and needs to be controlled and made into the Real World.
>Ressentiment
Ressentiment is the hatred for the Apparent World engendered by the impossibility to make it into the Real World. When someone is consumed by ressentiment they have no desire to live in the Apparent World because it can never match up to the perfection of the Real World. The key distinction to understand is that the Apparent World is naturally imperfect – to put it simply, shit happens. We can never fix everything.
>the Ubermensch
The Ubermensch is the figure who embraces active nihilism – he/she accepts life as it is, without compromise, without change. Zarathustra is the epitome of the figure of the Ubermensch – Zarathustra transcends morals and values to become a figure who affirms life in its whole.
most nihilists center around the idea of affirming life (love of life and all its parts) and amor fati (we should love fate and accept what life throws at us regardless of the outcome)
Deleuze has a rather good example of amor fati
He wrote a bit about the metaphor of a gambler throwing dice, and how a bad player will repeat his throw (he has calculated the probability) with a certain end in mind and he knows that his way there is the necessity of causality. However Deleuze argues that because there is no cause/reason in the world, this makes the gambler a bad player. So for the bad player, the final goal lies at the end of the causal chain instead of the event itself. But the good player affirms (Nietzschean) his single throw and realizes that his throw is not a piece in a grander picture/fate, but that the throw is an expression of the whole fate in itself.
It's up to you to decide whether to take the grey pill or not, anon. honestly a lot of the lit is hard to understand, so I don't blame you for not taking the plunge