[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1443519240223.jpg (132.81 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Politically-Correct-Libert….jpg)

 No.10156

Anyone familiar with this guy? Stumbled over him in the thread about r/militantancaps. Never heard of him before, and now I'm curious.

 No.10166

>>10156

>anarchist


 No.10175

>>10156

Fuck. I need to un-subscribe from him, thanks for reminding me OP.


 No.10176


 No.10178

>>10176

I dug up my long-abandoned reddit account just to tell this guy how huge of an idiot he is.


 No.10180

>>10178

Thanks faggot. I hope you die.

> sorry I lost all my pic relateds


 No.10184

File: 1443593539791.jpg (186.55 KB, 882x666, 49:37, militantancaps confirmed f….jpg)

I guess this ban was about my harsh words about Christoper Cuntwell. Fuck me, I wasn't even trying that hard. As far as I can tell, Cuntwell is high on nootropics and STILL unable to come up with anything worthwhile. Seriously, I have yet to hear a single word from him that was not preaching to the choir or just being as fanatical as possible. So apparently, he's not that smart or creative. He's not very charismatic, either. He's pulling the angry-guy-shtick that we all know so well from Video Game Reviewers, and this shouldn't impress anyone anymore. He's also fat, an alcoholic and doesn't seem to exercise. He made a blog post on how he's going to live healthier in the future, and yet, almost a year later, he still looks the fucking same and has yet to write the second part of that blog post.

So, what has this guy going for himself? I guess his zero-tolerance bullshit can be beneficial to the movement, once in a while. Sometimes, you need someone who decries everyone and everything. There's a reason why holocaust scholars - and I do mean actual scholars - appreciate the efforts of holocaust deniers: They point out flaws in their theories, and likewise, Cantwell may point out flaws in the thinking of fellow ancaps, simply because he's hypersensitive to them.

However, I doubt many people watch him for this reason. In any movement, someone is always trying to be the extremist who's more dedicated and consistent in his thinking than his fellow comrades/brothers/buddies/whatever. I think that Cantwell is preaching to these guys, the fanatics who are actively trying to get pissed off and have little interest in actually advancing their movement, or finding flaws within it. If anybody wants to prove me wrong, go ahead. I'd actually appreciate that. As much as I dislike Cantwell - and I doubt this will change - I'd like to know if he had written something worth reading, or, I don't know, helped a cat mother give birth.


 No.10185

>>10176

You fucked CapitalJusticeWarior real nice, man. Wicked debating skills.


 No.10193

File: 1443601860602.jpg (34.18 KB, 1089x125, 1089:125, militantancaps confirmed f….jpg)

>>10184

Kek. CapitalJusticeWarrior confirmed for even bigger pussy.


 No.10257

>>10185

thanks m'lord *tips fedora*


 No.10258

>>10180

you're welcome bby


 No.10274

File: 1443875064642.jpg (46.86 KB, 620x350, 62:35, mfw a young gentleman thin….jpg)

>>10257

>Still using the tipping meme unironically


 No.18543

It's refreshing to see an ancap going on the offensive instead of being a perma-pussy like most. Yes, commies deserve to be thrown from fucking helicopters. Don't think for a moment they wouldn't kill you if they could.


 No.18545

File: 1456884846600.jpg (21.15 KB, 280x278, 140:139, 1432183952411.jpg)

>>18543

NAP doesn't justify preemptive strikes like that. If someone raises an axe to chop your at you, okay, sure you can fire before it comes down, but merely existing with shitty beliefs justifies you killing them?

To be clear, I love the helicopter meme, it doesn't offend me, I just don't see it as a consistent option…


 No.18548

>>18545

anacaps are just closet fascists my friend


 No.18553

File: 1456886715390.jpg (106.31 KB, 574x500, 287:250, conductor.jpg)


 No.18558

File: 1456887615705.jpg (32.58 KB, 324x319, 324:319, 1425619580543.jpg)

>>18553

fuking kek, that image is 10/10


 No.18570

>>18548

Then mutualists are just closet Marxist-Leninists, my friend.

Everything comes down to the left-right spectrum in the end, in a time of crisis. You won't be able to escape picking a side.

As a non-anarchist this pleases me greatly and gives me a large erection.


 No.18573

>>18570

>Everything comes down to the left-right spectrum in the end, in a time of crisis.

Citation needed and all that, please fuck off.


 No.18580

>>18573

Take a look at the Spanish civil war, there were plenty of groups who were moderates but all got annihilated or were absorbed by the (right-wing German-backed) Fascists or (left-wing Communist-backed) Anarchists.

Crisis tend to radicalize all groups involved in them to further differentiate themselves from their enemy as a measure to prevent people switching sides and potentially recruit those who are on the fence.


 No.18581

>>18570

>mutualism

>lenininism

>mutualism

>having a vanguard

lel


 No.18582

File: 1456915658895.jpg (123.97 KB, 2048x1047, 2048:1047, 1453335037676-0.jpg)

>>18545

> but merely existing with shitty beliefs justifies you killing them?

I'm only saying they deserve it, regardless of whether it would be wise or even moral to do it. Communists are estopped from complaining about political terror because they believe in it when suits them.

I'm not saying it should be done, I'm saying it should be SAID by someone to make the rest look moderate in comparison. When commies complain about the "hate speech", we can point out to abundant examples of communist commentators, even currently active politicians around the world, defending all kinds of left-wing political violence. It's all about moving the Overton window to the right.

Helicopter rides would not exactly a preemptive strike, more lke a ruthless form of self defense during open war. You do realise that was the Chilean situation, right?

The main effect of ruthless punishment is self deportation of the enemy support base. You kill a few, the rest flee the country like the scoundrels they are. Overall, violence is minimized compared to most alternatives, and the people who are killed can't object to this strategy from a moral standpoint. Communists use this strategy whenever they get a chance. That's not a reason to do just like them, but don't let them give you morality lessons. Even with helicopter rides, we STILL would hold the high moral ground over them.

IOW, don't sweat it, just relax and enjoy the memes ;)


 No.18584

>>18573

Weimar Republic. There were "burgeois" parties (like Hitler called them) who hated NatSoc, but eventually they had to pick sides or let the commies win by remaining neutral.


 No.18586

>>18581

>ancap

>fascism

>ancap

>having a totalitarian corporate state

lel


 No.18587

>>18580

The Spanish Civil War is a good example of why NOT doing this gets you ass rekt. The commies deciding to attack the anarchists meant that the falangists had more unity and won.


 No.18589

File: 1456917911529.png (170.36 KB, 811x960, 811:960, WhMPCVG.jpg.png)


 No.18593

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>10156

I found him after he was yelling about Larken Rose.

I agree that leftist infiltration into the libertarian movement is going to kill it.


 No.18596

File: 1456933382282.jpeg (49.25 KB, 400x400, 1:1, dude legal weed nice.jpeg)

>>18593

A lot of libertarians are pussies who just want legal weed and think the Iraq war was a bad idea

Sometimes they will be against the excesses of Bullshit Sanders but they still want 'basic income'' and shit like that. As if that has ever been a good idea


 No.18602

>>18589

>Ironically, this limited definition of "anarchism" ensures that "anarcho"-capitalism is inherently self-refuting. This can be seen from leading "anarcho"-capitalist Murray Rothbard. He thundered against the evil of the state, arguing that it "arrogates to itself a monopoly of force, of ultimate decision-making power, over a given territorial area." In and of itself, this definition is unremarkable. That a few people (an elite of rulers) claim the right to rule others must be part of any sensible definition of the state or government. However, the problems begin for Rothbard when he notes that "[o]bviously, in a free society, Smith has the ultimate decision-making power over his own just property, Jones over his, etc." [The Ethics of Liberty, p. 170 and p. 173] The logical contradiction in this position should be obvious, but not to Rothbard. It shows the power of ideology, the ability of mere words (the expression "private property") to turn the bad ("ultimate decision-making power over a given area") into the good ("ultimate decision-making power over a given area").

What a fucking retard. States never homestead and voluntarily purchase land, their "claim" is completely illegitimate.

>>18596

I'm not willing to help end the drug war until welfare recipients are regularly drug tested/welfare is abolished and socialized healthcare is abolished.

I'd rather have parasites go to jail for a victimless crime that they would not be able to commit (and survive on charity) in a free society than literally pay them to sit on their ass and be degenerates.


 No.18605

>>18602

>[o]bviously, in a free society, Smith has the ultimate decision-making power over his own just property

>ultimate decision-making power over a given area

These are two different statements, with two distinct meanings. That I have ultimate decision-making power over my property means that I can burn it, sell it, change it, or throw it into a blackhole, as I see fit given that the blackhole is not the property of somebody else, which begs the question of how you homestead a blackhole; someone write a short story about that.

Now, if you want to kick an intruder off your property, then you are free to do so. This is just an exercise of your power over your property. What you can't do is imprison or torture that person. And this is where property rights are distincts from the territorial sovereignty of a state: Your property rights grant you merely ultimate decision-making power over your property, whereas the territorial sovereignty of a state extends to everything on a certain area.

Hope that was clear. The difference is admittedly fine, but it is there.


 No.18607

>>18605

Exactly. In fact, I would add, from the premise that you can do with your property whatever you like it does NOT follow that you have ultimate decision making over ANYTHING. In an ancap society, no one has ultimate decision making. Your homesteaded and/or bought property is yours BY GENERAL CONSENSUS, NOT because YOU DECIDED it is. That's what makes it an ancap society.


 No.18618

Cuckwell? Yeah, he's an asshole.

Even a broken clock is right two times a day though. His methods are idiotic, but he's right about bleeding heart libertarians destroying the movement with their open borders policies.


 No.18632

>>18586

>ancap

>having a totalitarian corporate state

yeah


 No.18635

>>18632

>not realizing that corporations have only become as big as they are because of government intervention into the marketplace

Corporations aren't people, in a free market they don't have the rights of the individual


 No.18674

>>18632

How would it be totalitarian? It could only sell things to people. It couldn't do any violence

>inb4 roving bandit gang corporation


 No.18708

>>18674

>tfw Globocorp's hired goons break your kneecaps for not buying enough Soylent Green


 No.18710

>>18708

I'm glad that would be illegal :3

Also we will all have guns :3

And no one will buy from globocorp any more XP


 No.18711

If you mongoloids can't write in complete sentences, then I will just ignore what you say.

Putting "<" before sentence fragments is imbecilic and I would thank you to maintain a reasonable level of discourse on this board.


 No.19462

>>18711

Lork moar you fucking newfaggot


 No.19468

>>19462

This was the worst necrobump ever.


 No.19469

>>19468

Why? He's a faggot, and probably also a raider. If he doesn't understand imageboard culture, he should fuck off.


 No.19481

File: 1458558133900.gif (635.99 KB, 636x358, 318:179, giphy.gif)

>>18635

they are too people

this here contract registered at my local private court says so

so goodluck pressin' charges, motherfucker, I'm behind 7 limited liability fronts


 No.19647

File: 1459054757719.jpg (99.94 KB, 736x736, 1:1, the nap doesn't apply to c….jpg)

>>18548

DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOU ARE, MOTHER FUCKER?


 No.19648

>>18548

Do whatever you want. I know for a fact that anarchosyndicalism is such a weak movement worldwide even moderately conservatives have more guns and training in working as a semi-organized militia than you guys ever will have.

You got so many vegans, pacifists and other supercucks in your ranks that a simple hunting party made up of men who just don't like leftists and blame rightfully and some not rightfully things on you would if the state collapsed basically string you chickenlegged and chickendarmed faggots in the nearest lamp post with a noose around your neck.

I have never understood why you leftists and commies try to smash the liberaldemocratic state so much and with such ineffective means. A fucking hunting party with fat men who need armrest when shooting a boltaction could take you hippy treehugging vegans down.

And then we got military personnel who hate your guts, ex-military, COPS (they really hate your shit) and business men.

If the liberal state falls, more people want you dead than the white power retards want to hang niggers.


 No.19684

>>19647

>filename

lol

Commies aren't people anyway (people have agency, commies done) so even if they decided to be reasonable the NAP still wouldn't apply to them.


 No.19685

>>19684

>commies done

dont*


 No.19689

>>19684

I must say it's the best libertarian meme I have seen in a long while.

THE NAP DOES NOT APPLY TO COMMIES

SHOOT THEM ON SIGHT


 No.19691

>>19689

PRIVATIZED DEATH CAMPS


 No.19692

>>19689

Well considering that their very ideology violates the NAP (we are going to violently steal redistribute your wealth at gunpoint through voluntary meant and if you disagree we are going to murder send you away for 'political reeducation' because you are obviously mentally insane) its perfectly alright to shoot them on sight because doing so is inherently defense of your life liberty and property.


 No.19693

>>19692

>voluntary meant

god dammit

voluntary means*


 No.19703

>>19647

>>19684

>>19685

>>19689

>>19691

>>19692

>>19693

FBI GET OUT

>>19692

Wanting to commit an unspecified crime sometime in the future is not enough to warrant being shot, neither to protect yourself (as whether they will commit the crime is still not clear) nor as retribution (as they haven't fucking committed the crime yet).

I hope a cop shoots you in the dick, you slanderous piece of goddamn motherfucking shit.


 No.19708

File: 1459198546799.jpg (358.27 KB, 750x500, 3:2, thatcher_pinochet.jpg)

>>19703

THE NAP DOES NOT APPLY TO COMMIES


 No.19709

>>19708

FBI GET OUT




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]